Connect with us

Connecticut

Many CT election loopholes have closed since Bridgeport investigation: official

Published

on

Many CT election loopholes have closed since Bridgeport investigation: official


Five people now face charges in the Bridgeport absentee ballot investigation we’ve been following since 2023. It’s once again bringing up concerns about the security of our elections.

Alfredo Castillo, Wanda Geter-Pataky, Maria Pereia, Jazmarie Melendez and Margaret Joyce are being charged with multiple counts of misrepresenting eligibility requirements of absentee voters and more during the 2023 mayoral primary.

For the full charges of each person, you can check out our previous coverage here.

This development to this years-long investigation is an unsettling reminder for Bridgeport residents when they reflect on this controversy from two years ago.

Advertisement

“The truth is going to come out sooner or later and it finally did,” Shalinda, of Bridgeport, said.

“I think it’s a big problem, I really do,” Anthony Lombardo, of Bridgeport, said.

Geter-Pataky is the vice chair of the Bridgeport Democrats. Castillo and Pereia are Bridgeport City Council members.

Allegations claim absentee ballots were misused for the primary election between incumbent Mayor Joe Ganim and John Gomes.

Ganim won the first primary, the re-do primary and the general election.

Advertisement

“My office, the state elections enforcement commission and the legislature have been laser focused on Bridgeport,” Stephanie Thomas, Secretary of the State of Connecticut (D), said.

Thomas said many loopholes have been closed since this unfolded, and they impact every town in the state.

She said a new law requires that drop boxes in the state have a camera with footage that is retained — to allow more cases to use video evidence.

“A number of technical changes were made that, both limit the length of time an absentee ballot application can be used, and also the length of time, in which they are available prior to each given election,” Thomas said.

In November, voters approved a new Constitutional amendment that lets them send in their absentee ballots by mail. There are bills related to this new change in the legislature now.

Advertisement

As this Bridgeport case continues, Thomas said the work to prevent it does, too, proposing a bill herself that seeks to create a bilingual election education campaign and continue using election monitors.

Castillo, Geter-Pataky, Pereia, Melendez and Joyce were released with the expectation they’ll appear in court on March 6.

NBC Connecticut has reached out to both Ganim and Gomes multiple times, but hasn’t heard back.



Source link

Advertisement

Connecticut

Immigrant advocates urge Connecticut to prepare after Supreme Court TPS ruling

Published

on

Immigrant advocates urge Connecticut to prepare after Supreme Court TPS ruling


Immigrant advocates in Connecticut are calling on state leaders to prepare for the possible loss of legal protections for thousands of people after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration can move forward with ending Temporary Protected Status, or TPS, for Haitians and Syrians.

TPS is a federal program that allows people from countries facing war, natural disasters or other extraordinary conditions to live and work legally in the United States. The Trump administration has argued that conditions in some countries have improved enough that the protections are no longer necessary.

For organizations that work with immigrants, however, the ruling has triggered fear and uncertainty.

“The Haitian community, in particular, is reeling,” said Maggie Mitchell-Salem, executive director of Integrated Refugee and Immigrant Services, commonly known as IRIS.

Advertisement

Mitchell-Salem said the number of Syrians affected by the decision is much smaller than the number of Haitians nationwide, but she argued that the impact goes beyond statistics. Her organization has led resettlement efforts for Syrian refugees in Connecticut since the federal government offered TPS status amid the Syrian civil war in 2012.

“Numbers don’t matter,” she said. “A single person being impacted by inhumane racist immigration policies is a person who’s impacted, and we should care.”

A community preparing for uncertainty

Mitchell-Salem said immigrant advocacy groups and local officials are already discussing how to help families who could face difficult decisions if the Trump administration decides to end TPS protections.

Among the biggest concerns are families that could be separated if parents lose their legal status or face deportation.

“We’re working with municipalities, with any community leaders that we can, who are coming up with plans on what to do to help individuals here,” she said.

Advertisement

She urged families whose immigration status may be at risk to create preparedness plans and designate trusted relatives or friends who could care for children if necessary.

The state of Connecticut has one on their website,” she said. “We urge everyone who has a family situation that is no longer stable to fill that out.”

Looking to Massachusetts as a model

Mitchell-Salem said Connecticut should consider following the example set by Massachusetts leaders, who responded to the Supreme Court ruling by holding a press conference, reassuring TPS holders of their rights, announcing legal clinics and creating an emergency response fund.

“What I think is beautiful about what Massachusetts did is that it signaled you are valued, you are part of our community, and we care about you,” she said. “For that, I would love to see Connecticut do something similar.”

At the same time, she cautioned that there are limits to what states can do if federal protections ultimately end.

Advertisement

“I think the state of Connecticut is right to really think about what remedies are truly possible,” Mitchell-Salem said.

Warning against scams

Mitchell-Salem said one of her organization’s biggest concerns is that desperate immigrants could become targets for fraud.

“What we’re most concerned about is that because people will be so desperate that there are those that will take advantage of them,” she said.

IRIS has been posting information in English, Haitian Creole and Arabic warning immigrants that there are “no magic solutions” and encouraging them to seek advice only from trusted legal organizations and immigration attorneys.

A call to action

Mitchell-Salem said the Supreme Court’s decision should prompt action not only from government officials but also from the public.

Advertisement

“Flood congressional phone banks, call Congress every single day, tell them what you think,” she said. “Get your friends in states that are less blue than Connecticut to do the same.”

She said public pressure has altered the course of other administration policies and could again influence federal immigration decisions.

“This isn’t an issue that’s just a blip that’s going to go away,” Mitchell-Salem said.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Lamont signs law in Norwich to stop pay to contractors violating wages

Published

on

Lamont signs law in Norwich to stop pay to contractors violating wages


Connecticut is taking a step to make sure workers are paid fairly.

On June 30, Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont signed Public Act 26-17, which enables the State Comptroller to issue a stop work order and withhold state funds to contractors that are not properly paying their employees.

The bill was signed on the construction site for Greeneville Elementary School, which is one of the four new elementary schools being built in Norwich. The State of Connecticut is reimbursing the city for 80% of the project, and the law applies to “any place where the state is making a payment,” Lamont said.

Advertisement

Wage theft can take many forms

It matters because wage theft can take many forms, from money taken from base pay, to money not given in benefits, Kimberly Glassman, director of compliance and government affairs for the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 478, said.

Local 478 also has a presence in the Norwich school building project, with 10 to 20 union members working at each site daily, Glassman said.

What do state leaders think of the Greeneville site’s progress?

Lamont is impressed with how quickly the work is going.

Advertisement

“They told me that the walls went up in the last two weeks, so a lot of progress is happening,” he said.

During the bill signing, Norwich Mayor Swarnjit Singh touted the importance of using union labor and the value of project labor agreements.

“We are on time and on budget,” he said.

After the bill signing, Singh said its possible the Greeneville School building could be complete as soon as the first quarter of 2027, he said.

Advertisement

“They’re not wasting any time,” Singh said.

State Rep. Derrel Wilson attended the original Greeneville School as a kid, and still lives in Greeneville. He was credited as being one of the driving forces for getting the workers bill passed.

“It’s exciting seeing this revitalization for our neighborhood, seeing active construction and watching individuals rebuild our community,” Wilson said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

US Supreme Court to consider challenge to Connecticut assault weapons ban

Published

on

US Supreme Court to consider challenge to Connecticut assault weapons ban


HARTFORD, Conn. (WFSB) – The U.S. Supreme Court said Tuesday it will take up an appeal challenging bans on the AR-15 and other semi-automatic firearms, including the ban in Connecticut and in the Chicago area.

Similar bans are in place in about a dozen states. The case is expected to be heard in the fall.

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong said the state’s assault weapons ban is lawful and that his office is prepared to fight the challenge in court.

“Connecticut’s assault weapon ban is lawful, lifesaving, and broadly supported. The gun lobby has flooded the courts in states across the country to get an assault weapons case up to this Supreme Court. We are prepared for this fight, and we are going to go in with everything we’ve got to keep these weapons of war off our streets, out of our schools, and away from our families,” said Attorney General Tong.

Advertisement

Copyright 2026 WFSB. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending