Connect with us

Connecticut

How will ranked-choice voting work in Connecticut?

Published

on

How will ranked-choice voting work in Connecticut?


HARTFORD, Conn. (WTNH) — A new working group convened by Gov. Ned Lamont will craft a proposal for the state legislature to introduce ranked-choice voting in some Connecticut elections.

Currently, 29 states allow for ranked-choice voting, mostly in party primaries and municipal elections.

The most common type of ranked-choice voting is a system known as instant-runoff ranked-choice voting. In an election utilizing instant-runoff ranked-choice voting, voters are able to rank each candidate in order of preference. Voters are not required to rank all of the candidates if they do not want to. If no candidate receives a majority of first choice votes, the candidate with the lowest number of first choice votes is eliminated. Voters who listed the eliminated candidate as their first choice then have their second choice counted as part of a second round of vote counting. This process repeats until one candidate has a majority.

For advocates of ranked-choice voting, the process represents something of a remedy for political polarization that they attribute largely to the current system of primary elections.

Advertisement

“The current system rewards factions and it rewards the fringes of a party,” said Monte Frank, an attorney and the vice chair of the working group. “So, the more polarizing you are, the better you do in a partisan, winner-take-all primary.”

Frank sees ranked-choice voting as a way to encourage candidates to court a wider base of support on the theory that being a voter’s second, third or even fourth choice gives them a better chance to win if multiple rounds of vote counting are required.

Frank is the former running mate of the late Oz Greibel, the third-party candidate for governor who captured just under 4% of the vote in the 2018 gubernatorial contest that pitted Republican Bob Stefanowski against Lamont.

“It not only drives voter participation, increases voter choice, but it produces a better candidate, a more consensus-driven candidate, and that improves our democracy,” Frank said.

The governor’s working group includes representation from both political parties and is co-chaired by one state senator from each side of the aisle. Any potential recommendation to the legislature would apply only to the use of ranked-choice voting in primaries, certain municipal elections, caucuses and conventions. Political parties and municipalities would have the choice of whether to adopt ranked-choice voting.

Advertisement

“My hope is that this working group will collect the information necessary to make specific recommendations and hopefully improve voter turnout in Connecticut,” Sen. Cathy Osten (D-District 19) said in a statement announcing the working group.

Osten, who also chairs the legislature’s influential appropriations committee, is sharing leadership of the ranked-choice voting working group with Republican Sen. Tony Hwang (District 28).

“We hope to learn how ranked-choice voting can give the voters of Connecticut a stronger and more representative voice in their local elections,” Hwang said in a statement.

Despite bipartisan interest in exploring the use of ranked-choice voting in Connecticut primaries and municipal elections, concerns remain about the wisdom of making major changes to the voting process.

“One of my concerns globally is that we’ve done a lot of changes to our election laws,” Rep. Vincent Candelora (District 86), the House Republican leader.

Advertisement

Candelora was referencing the introduction of early voting, which Connecticut is implementing for the first time this year. Local elections officials, he said, are challenged by the expanded in-person voting periods and would be further burdened if they had to adapt to the process of tabulating ranked-choice ballots.

Candelora also questioned how many races would actually draw more than two candidates.

“I just think that’s rare when it happens,” he said, “So, you know, to me it’s more of an academic exercise versus something that will really have a practical impact on Connecticut voting.”

The inaugural meeting of the Governor’s Working Group on Ranked-Choice Voting is on June 14.

Advertisement



Source link

Connecticut

Coney Island family sells entire wall featuring Banksy mural to Connecticut brewery for big bucks

Published

on

Coney Island family sells entire wall featuring Banksy mural to Connecticut brewery for big bucks


Bye-bye, Banksy.

A Brooklyn family is about half a million dollars richer after selling a mural of a little robot that the iconic graffiti artist Banksy painted on their Coney Island building for 13 years ago.

The Ruoccos decade-long effort to cash in on “The Tagging Robot” ended last month, when an arts company took down an entire section of their Stillwell and Neptune avenues brick wall and shipped it off to a trendy brewery in Connecticut, the family said.

The “Tagging Robot” is officially gone from the Coney Island wall it sat on for 13 years. Anthony J Causi

“Brooklyn family strikes gold!” Richard Ruocco, of Bergen Beach, joked to The Post Wednesday.

Advertisement

The Ruoccos had been trying to pawn off the famous mural since they effectively hit the art world lottery, when the enigmatic graffiti legend painted the bot on their building in the middle of the night back in October 2013, shortly after Superstorm Sandy.

The piece, which the family lovingly calls “Mr. Robot,” depicted the android spray painting a barcode, and was one of several barcode murals that Banksy blanketed across the globe that fall.

The Ruoccos initially had no idea that the graffiti was by a famous artist until swarms of gawkers came to witness the viral sensation.

“Brooklyn family strikes gold!” said Richard Ruocco, seen here. Obtained by the NY Post

They immediately protected Mr. Robot behind a roll-down gate and hired a security guard — and started looking to make a bundle off the work in the arts market.

“Why not? What are we going to do with it? Leave it on the wall and lose the money,” said Ruocco, who is cousins to the Russo family behind Gargiulo’s in Coney Island.

Advertisement

Unfortunately, the hype around Banksy died down and buyers were hard to come by until Ruocco’s older brother, Anthony, read that a Connecticut beer garden had acquired another Banksy mural that was left in The Bronx during the same era as “Mr. Robot.

The robot mural is installed at Foolproof brewery in Bridgeport.
The mural was jammed into steel framing and removed as a massive piece.

Foolproof in Bridgeport last February installed a massive wall showing a young boy spray painting the words “Ghetto 4 Life” on a brick wall while a butler in formal attire stands beside him holding a tray of spray paint cans — which initially caused an unwelcome stir for “insulting the neighborhood,” CT Post reported at the time.

Anthony Ruocco called the brewery over the summer and “brokered the deal” to pass along the Robot mural, Ruocco said.

“We didn’t sell it for what we originally wanted. We lowered our price and he went for it. Not too many people were willing to buy a brick wall,” said Ruocco, adding that the buyer also had to pay about $75,000 for art shippers to remove and transport the mural.

The robot joined another formerly NYC Banksy at Foolproof Brewery in Bridgeport, Connecticut. Douglas Healey

Representatives for Foolproof did not immediately respond to The Post’s request for comment.

Advertisement

An incredible video shows Fine Art Shippers meticulously shoring up a portion of the brick wall into steel framing and jackhammering it out into one piece before shipping it off to Bridgeport, a journey first reported by Coneyologist.

Ruocco did not want to share how much cash the family received for the piece, but teased that it was for “less than half a million bucks.”

“That’s too personal. No one needs to know that, except my accountant,” he said.

Richard, left, Frank and Anthony Ruocco split the cash with their other three siblings. Obtained by the NY Post

He and his five siblings evenly split the sale, which leaves “enough to buy a nice car each.”

“We’re a very fair family. I know that’s what our parents would have wanted us to do. We shared everything right to the penny,” said Ruocco.

Advertisement

One of the siblings has already treated themselves to a cruise and Ruocco dreamed about buying a new car for his collection, though he admitted his wife would make him get rid of one before adding another.

The Ruocco siblings, now all in retirement, are planning to sell the building where the Banksy mural once lived. It had once been the site of Aiello’s catering, which the family ran from the 80s to the 90s.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Connecticut prisons in ‘sustained institutional failure,’ watchdog report finds

Published

on

Connecticut prisons in ‘sustained institutional failure,’ watchdog report finds


Systemic problems with medical care, frequent lockdowns and unsanitary conditions jeopardize the well-being of people in Connecticut prisons, according to a new report.

Correction Ombuds DeVaughn Ward on Tuesday released a detailed account of conditions inside state correctional facilities.

The 57-page document describes routine staffing shortages, poor sanitation and inconsistent access to health care, nutrition, legal services and communication.

Courtesy Office of Correction Ombudsman

Advertisement
Mold present on a shower ventilation unit at Hartford Correctional Center.

Ward, who serves as an independent watchdog for the corrections system, wrote that state prisons now operate in a state of “sustained institutional failure.”

“I did not make that finding lightly,” he said in an interview Tuesday.

“When you look at any of the metrics that you would judge a functional correctional system on, I could not think of one that … the state of Connecticut was meeting to standard,” he said.

In a statement, the Department of Correction (DOC) said it strongly objects to Ward’s findings. While there is room for improvement, the report draws wide-ranging inferences from singular occurrences, and contains unsupported allegations that “appear to serve only to foster an extremely negative perception of the agency,” the department said.

DOC plans to submit a detailed response to the report by Feb. 20.

Advertisement

‘Basic standards of sanitation’

Among its significant findings, the report describes unsanitary housing conditions across a range of facilities, including mold on showers, mice in food preparation areas and a lack of toilet paper and hygiene supplies.

Ward wrote that he personally observed black mold during visits to MacDougall–Walker Correctional Institution, and saw vents heavily coated in gray mold at Hartford Correctional Center.

A photo included in the report shows a bathroom with black and white mold spots spread across the ceiling. Another shows a dead mouse lying on the floor of the dining area at Osborn Correctional Institution.

Mouse observed in the dining area at Osborn Correctional Institution.

Courtesy Office of Correction Ombudsman

Advertisement
Mouse observed in the dining area at Osborn Correctional Institution.

“Prolonged lack of access to showers, inadequate hygiene supplies, soiled bedding, rodent infestations, and poor ventilation—especially during periods of extreme heat—pose significant health risks and undermine basic standards of sanitation, dignity, and humane treatment,” the report reads.

Delayed diagnosis and treatment

Ward, an attorney who previously represented incarcerated people who were denied adequate medical care, also described ongoing health care challenges, including delays in diagnosis and treatment.

The report notes that DOC missed an Oct. 1, 2025 deadline to develop a comprehensive health care services plan, which is still pending.

The report also includes numerous anecdotes from incarcerated people who described not receiving timely or adequate treatment.

Advertisement
Dental treatment rooms at York Correctional Institution and Cheshire Correctional Institution.

Courtesy Office of Correction Ombudsman

Dental treatment rooms at York Correctional Institution and Cheshire Correctional Institution.

In one example, Ward wrote his office received a complaint in October from the family of a person incarcerated at York Correctional Institution who experienced delayed treatment for a known ear condition, despite recognizing the signs of a recurrence. A specialist at UConn Health later determined earlier intervention could have prevented additional surgery, according to the report.

DOC’s Health Services Unit doesn’t maintain a centralized system for tracking sick-call wait times, or wait times for outpatient or specialty medical services, which limits DOC’s ability to monitor delays and identify backlogs, according to the report.

“Delayed diagnosis and treatment may increase long-term medical costs borne by the State and increase exposure to grievances and litigation,” the report said.

Lockdowns and staffing shortages

Advertisement

Staffing shortages are a significant and recurring problem, according to the report, which indicates that facilities are frequently placed in modified or full lockdowns because there aren’t enough staff on duty.

The frequency of lockdowns results in family members missing visitation, and lack of access to core activities, such as bathing, recreation, educational programming and medical care, the report said.

“These conditions affected not only incarcerated individuals but also staff, who were required to work extended hours under increasingly strained conditions,” it said.

Rudy Demiraj, a service representative of AFSCME Council 4, one of the largest unions representing DOC employees, agreed staffing is a significant concern.

Council 4 represents approximately 4,000 DOC workers, including correction and parole officers.

Advertisement

Demiraj, a retired correction officer, said the union has long advocated for the department to address staff recruitment and retention. Officers are sometimes required to work back-to-back shifts when not enough staff are available, Demiraj said.

“It’s a difficult environment to work in for eight hours, and it becomes an even more difficult environment to work in for 16 hours,” he said.

Governor: ‘DOC must do better’

In a written statement, Gov. Ned Lamont’s administration highlighted recent progress at DOC, but acknowledged the need for improvement.

The department has strengthened oversight of administrative leave, improved compliance with rules for training and documentation, and done better with asset management and medication administration, according to Rob Blanchard, a spokesperson for Lamont.

Advertisement

Nevertheless, “repeated findings across multiple audits show this is about whether our systems are built to succeed,” Blanchard said.

He added the problems highlighted in the report are systemic rather than the fault of an individual.

The governor’s administration will continue working to strengthen internal controls, clarify accountability, modernize systems and ensure clear performance metrics, he said.

“For the safety of our correctional officers, those in our custody, and Connecticut taxpayers, DOC must do better,” he said.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Report on Connecticut’s corrections facilities finds ‘sustained institutional failure,’ calls for legislative oversight

Published

on

Report on Connecticut’s corrections facilities finds ‘sustained institutional failure,’ calls for legislative oversight


“Connecticut’s correctional system is operating in a state of sustained institutional failure.”

That’s what a new report by the Office of the Correction Ombuds concluded after looking into complaints and reports across the state’s correctional facilities for over a year.

The OCO was re-established in September 2024 and submitted its inaugural 2025 report. Despite the OCO lacking a full investigative staff, they investigated reported incidents, conditions, and complaints at the state’s correctional facilities.

According to the report, the conditions they found were consistent across many facilities and underscored the “seriousness and pervasiveness of the issues confronting Connecticut’s correctional system.

Advertisement

“These are not isolated lapses or temporary disruptions,” the report stated. “They are structural deficiencies, embedded in daily operations. In many respects, [the Department of Corrections (DOC)] appears to be failing to fulfill its statutory mandates.

You can read the entire report here.

The OCO found that the DOC relied heavily on modified and full facility lockdowns when faced with staffing shortages. Lockdowns are usually limited measures that are used in genuine emergencies in facilities.

According to DOC, there were 387 reported lockdowns in 2025. When facilities go into lockdown, visitation, recreation time, educational and therapy programs, religious services, hygiene, medical needs, and access to law libraries and communications are suspended.

The OCO said they received numerous complaints that people were confined to their cells for days at a time. This caused people to miss their medical appointments, go days without showers, and lose visits with family members.

Advertisement

The report stated that the lockdowns occurred “predictably” around weekends, holidays, and other staffing-stress points. According to OCO, while they acknowledge the staffing difficulties that the DOC has, the evidence shows there are no minimum staffing standards and no limits on the frequency or duration of lockdowns.

Mental health and medical needs were also the subject of many complaints to the OCO, according to the report. The OCO cited a December 2025 report from Disability Rights Connecticut that found sexual assault and systemic safety failures at York Correctional Institution, particularly affecting people with disabilities.

Also in late 2025, the Office of the Child Advocate issued a report that found repeated, unjustified use of force against youth at Manson Youth Institution.

According to the OCO, these were due to lack of staffing, inadequate training, and “weak internal controls.”

When it comes to the living conditions at the facilities, the OCO observed unsanitary and “degrading living conditions.” This included mold-contaminated ventilation, rodent infestations, sewage backups, and prolonged denial of hygiene supplies and shower access.

Advertisement

The OCO said that the conditions also affect correctional staff who work prolonged shifts.

An investigation into the Inmate Legal Assistance Program revealed deficiencies so significant that the office had to resort to “enforcement litigation” to obtain records from a state contractor that performed the services.

“That such litigation was required to secure basic oversight cooperation is itself a serious concern,” the OCO said in the report.

The OCO also cited multiple audits done on the DOC’s operations. The audits reported repeated findings, including improper extended paid administrative leave, weaknesses in overtime and payroll controls, failures in asset management, and repeated noncompliance with statutory reporting requirements.

“The recurrence of these findings over multiple audit cycles reflects a failure to implement corrective action–failures that directly affect staffing availability, infrastructure maintenance, transparency, and public trust,” the report said.

Advertisement

The OCO said there was cooperation with the DOC wardens, staff, and central offices, who responded to inquiries and engaged with oversight efforts.

“The [OCO] submits this report as both a record and a warning: Absent decisive intervention, Connecticut risks entrenching a correctional system defined by instability, isolation, and preventable harm,” the report concluded.

NBC Connecticut has reached out to the DOC for a comment on the report and has not heard back at this time.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending