Connecticut
How will ranked-choice voting work in Connecticut?
HARTFORD, Conn. (WTNH) — A new working group convened by Gov. Ned Lamont will craft a proposal for the state legislature to introduce ranked-choice voting in some Connecticut elections.
Currently, 29 states allow for ranked-choice voting, mostly in party primaries and municipal elections.
The most common type of ranked-choice voting is a system known as instant-runoff ranked-choice voting. In an election utilizing instant-runoff ranked-choice voting, voters are able to rank each candidate in order of preference. Voters are not required to rank all of the candidates if they do not want to. If no candidate receives a majority of first choice votes, the candidate with the lowest number of first choice votes is eliminated. Voters who listed the eliminated candidate as their first choice then have their second choice counted as part of a second round of vote counting. This process repeats until one candidate has a majority.
For advocates of ranked-choice voting, the process represents something of a remedy for political polarization that they attribute largely to the current system of primary elections.
“The current system rewards factions and it rewards the fringes of a party,” said Monte Frank, an attorney and the vice chair of the working group. “So, the more polarizing you are, the better you do in a partisan, winner-take-all primary.”
Frank sees ranked-choice voting as a way to encourage candidates to court a wider base of support on the theory that being a voter’s second, third or even fourth choice gives them a better chance to win if multiple rounds of vote counting are required.
Frank is the former running mate of the late Oz Greibel, the third-party candidate for governor who captured just under 4% of the vote in the 2018 gubernatorial contest that pitted Republican Bob Stefanowski against Lamont.
“It not only drives voter participation, increases voter choice, but it produces a better candidate, a more consensus-driven candidate, and that improves our democracy,” Frank said.
The governor’s working group includes representation from both political parties and is co-chaired by one state senator from each side of the aisle. Any potential recommendation to the legislature would apply only to the use of ranked-choice voting in primaries, certain municipal elections, caucuses and conventions. Political parties and municipalities would have the choice of whether to adopt ranked-choice voting.
“My hope is that this working group will collect the information necessary to make specific recommendations and hopefully improve voter turnout in Connecticut,” Sen. Cathy Osten (D-District 19) said in a statement announcing the working group.
Osten, who also chairs the legislature’s influential appropriations committee, is sharing leadership of the ranked-choice voting working group with Republican Sen. Tony Hwang (District 28).
“We hope to learn how ranked-choice voting can give the voters of Connecticut a stronger and more representative voice in their local elections,” Hwang said in a statement.
Despite bipartisan interest in exploring the use of ranked-choice voting in Connecticut primaries and municipal elections, concerns remain about the wisdom of making major changes to the voting process.
“One of my concerns globally is that we’ve done a lot of changes to our election laws,” Rep. Vincent Candelora (District 86), the House Republican leader.
Candelora was referencing the introduction of early voting, which Connecticut is implementing for the first time this year. Local elections officials, he said, are challenged by the expanded in-person voting periods and would be further burdened if they had to adapt to the process of tabulating ranked-choice ballots.
Candelora also questioned how many races would actually draw more than two candidates.
“I just think that’s rare when it happens,” he said, “So, you know, to me it’s more of an academic exercise versus something that will really have a practical impact on Connecticut voting.”
The inaugural meeting of the Governor’s Working Group on Ranked-Choice Voting is on June 14.
Connecticut
The ranks of unaffiliated CT voters are growing
Connecticut
Undocumented immigrants do pay taxes
Setting the record straight on what undocumented immigrants do – and don’t – contribute to the communities they live in.
They have often been accused of draining resources.
Many undocumented people have been paying taxes – like a landscaping business owner we spoke with.
For some, the question is how much undocumented people pay in taxes compared to how much is spent to provide them services.
There’s a lot of things we won’t tell you about this undocumented man; name, age, where he lives…
But he’s been here for 20 years and works as a landscaper to support his wife and two American born kids.
“I came here for most of the reasons that other people come, to seek a better life,” he said.
We asked him what he thinks when he hears people say undocumented immigrants “don’t” pay taxes.
“Since I came here, since I got my first job, I always paid taxes. State tax, federal tax, have a few vehicles, pay tax,” he said.
Elizabeth Ricci, an immigration attorney, tells us yes , it’s a no brainer, you can’t say undocumented people don’t pay taxes in the U.S.
“It’s intellectually dishonest. So everyone’s paying taxes, the question is to what level,” Ricci said.
State Senator Rob Sampson (R-Wolcott) supports immigration reform and believes undocumented people cost Connecticut more than it gets in tax revenue.
“The amount of taxes paid by illegal immigrants is about half of what a lawful resident would pay. They’re not able to work lawfully. They’ve got to work under the table,” Sampson said.
A study by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP) – which some have described as left leaning – said based on estimates in 2022, undocumented immigrants paid approximately $406 million of state and local taxes in Connecticut. There’s no estimate on what they cost the state.
“Our research doesn’t really focus on the net effects, but we know that undocumented immigrants are working and paying taxes,” Marco Guzman with ITEP said.
Another study by the Federation for Immigration Reform (FAIR) – described by some as a right-leaning – looked at estimates of both how much undocumented people paid in to the system in Connecticut and how much programs for them, and their children cost. It concluded they cost Connecticut $1.3 billion in 2023.
“They have human needs, and if they can’t afford to pay for it, then somebody else is, and that is the taxpayers of Connecticut,” Ira Mehlman from FAIR said.
The undocumented man we spoke with said whatever numbers you want to quote, he believes by starting his own landscaping business to support his family, and employ others, he’s a net positive to our state.
“I’m not here to steal from the state or steal from other people, I’m just here for a better future,” he said.
The State of Connecticut’s Office of Policy and Management has hard data indicating in fiscal 2024 and 2025 combined, our state spent $80 million on Medicaid for undocumented children up to age 15 and pregnant, or postpartum mothers.
It is worth noting when undocumented people do pay taxes, they often don’t receive the services they pay for, namely, social security.
Connecticut
Connecticut House votes to add $500 million to ‘rainy day fund’
HARTFORD, Conn. (WTNH) — Shortly before 10 p.m. on Wednesday, the Connecticut House of Representatives signed off on a plan to set aside a $500 million surplus into the state’s “rainy day fund” as a temporary stopgap against cuts from Washington.
The $500 million will sit in the state’s budget reserves and be available for use at the direction of Governor Ned Lamont — who must get sign-off from the legislature’s leadership — until the legislature reconvenes for its regular session next February.
When lawmakers were crafting the legislation, they envisioned the funds being used to fill in the gaps created by the federal government shutdown, as well as cutbacks included in President Donald Trump’s signature “Big Beautiful Bill.”
Even with a deal in place to end the shutdown, the legislature’s majority Democrats held to their course and pushed for the deposit into the budget reserves. Funding for programs like SNAP food assistance, Democrats reasoned, should be guaranteed by the state in the face of uncertainty at the federal level.
“To bank on Washington not falling back into chaos or dysfunction is probably not a bet we’re willing to make when we’re talking about pretty important programs,” State Rep. Matt Ritter, the Democratic House Speaker, said.
Ritter’s Democratic caucus voted uniformly in favor of the $500 million measure and were joined by a majority of the House’s Republicans. State Rep. Vincent Candelora, the House GOP leader, helped craft the funding bill and voted in favor of it’s passage. Most of Candelora’s top lieutenants and key committee leaders also voted in favor. 21 members, mostly members of the GOP caucus’s more conservative wing, broke ranks and opposed the bill.
Candelora said that, with the shutdown over and the need to backfill programs like SNAP and the LIHEAP heating assistance program now negated, he is hopeful the money will not be spent — though some Democrats have floated using the funds to counteract cuts to Affordable Care Act subsidies that are currently set to take effect in the new year.
“I imagine most of that money will be intact and it will return to the rainy day fund,” Candelora said.
Now that it has won approval in the House, the bill heads to the State Senate, which is scheduled to convene on Thursday.
-
Nebraska7 days agoWhere to watch Nebraska vs UCLA today: Time, TV channel for Week 11 game
-
Austin, TX1 week agoHalf-naked woman was allegedly tortured and chained in Texas backyard for months by five ‘friends’ who didn’t ‘like her anymore’
-
Hawaii6 days agoMissing Kapolei man found in Waipio, attorney says
-
Vermont3 days agoNorthern Lights to dazzle skies across these US states tonight – from Washington to Vermont to Maine | Today News
-
Southwest1 week agoTexas launches effort to install TPUSA in every high school and college
-
New Jersey5 days agoPolice investigate car collision, shooting in Orange, New Jersey
-
World1 week agoIsrael’s focus on political drama rather than Palestinian rape victim
-
West Virginia4 days ago
Search for coal miner trapped in flooded West Virginia mine continues for third day