Connecticut
How will ranked-choice voting work in Connecticut?
HARTFORD, Conn. (WTNH) — A new working group convened by Gov. Ned Lamont will craft a proposal for the state legislature to introduce ranked-choice voting in some Connecticut elections.
Currently, 29 states allow for ranked-choice voting, mostly in party primaries and municipal elections.
The most common type of ranked-choice voting is a system known as instant-runoff ranked-choice voting. In an election utilizing instant-runoff ranked-choice voting, voters are able to rank each candidate in order of preference. Voters are not required to rank all of the candidates if they do not want to. If no candidate receives a majority of first choice votes, the candidate with the lowest number of first choice votes is eliminated. Voters who listed the eliminated candidate as their first choice then have their second choice counted as part of a second round of vote counting. This process repeats until one candidate has a majority.
For advocates of ranked-choice voting, the process represents something of a remedy for political polarization that they attribute largely to the current system of primary elections.
“The current system rewards factions and it rewards the fringes of a party,” said Monte Frank, an attorney and the vice chair of the working group. “So, the more polarizing you are, the better you do in a partisan, winner-take-all primary.”
Frank sees ranked-choice voting as a way to encourage candidates to court a wider base of support on the theory that being a voter’s second, third or even fourth choice gives them a better chance to win if multiple rounds of vote counting are required.
Frank is the former running mate of the late Oz Greibel, the third-party candidate for governor who captured just under 4% of the vote in the 2018 gubernatorial contest that pitted Republican Bob Stefanowski against Lamont.
“It not only drives voter participation, increases voter choice, but it produces a better candidate, a more consensus-driven candidate, and that improves our democracy,” Frank said.
The governor’s working group includes representation from both political parties and is co-chaired by one state senator from each side of the aisle. Any potential recommendation to the legislature would apply only to the use of ranked-choice voting in primaries, certain municipal elections, caucuses and conventions. Political parties and municipalities would have the choice of whether to adopt ranked-choice voting.
“My hope is that this working group will collect the information necessary to make specific recommendations and hopefully improve voter turnout in Connecticut,” Sen. Cathy Osten (D-District 19) said in a statement announcing the working group.
Osten, who also chairs the legislature’s influential appropriations committee, is sharing leadership of the ranked-choice voting working group with Republican Sen. Tony Hwang (District 28).
“We hope to learn how ranked-choice voting can give the voters of Connecticut a stronger and more representative voice in their local elections,” Hwang said in a statement.
Despite bipartisan interest in exploring the use of ranked-choice voting in Connecticut primaries and municipal elections, concerns remain about the wisdom of making major changes to the voting process.
“One of my concerns globally is that we’ve done a lot of changes to our election laws,” Rep. Vincent Candelora (District 86), the House Republican leader.
Candelora was referencing the introduction of early voting, which Connecticut is implementing for the first time this year. Local elections officials, he said, are challenged by the expanded in-person voting periods and would be further burdened if they had to adapt to the process of tabulating ranked-choice ballots.
Candelora also questioned how many races would actually draw more than two candidates.
“I just think that’s rare when it happens,” he said, “So, you know, to me it’s more of an academic exercise versus something that will really have a practical impact on Connecticut voting.”
The inaugural meeting of the Governor’s Working Group on Ranked-Choice Voting is on June 14.
Connecticut
Connecticut woman identified as longtime Jeffrey Epstein assistant
NEW CANAAN, CT (WFSB) — Additional un-redacted names came to light from Jeffrey Epstein files this week, revealing that a longtime assistant of the disgraced financier is from Connecticut.
Lesley Groff from New Canaan was Epstein’s executive assistant for almost two decades. Her name appears in the documents more than 130,000 times.
Documents show that she was served a subpoena in 2019 after Epstein’s arrest, but prosecutors declined to charge her.
She also faced multiple lawsuits by victims accusing her of facilitating his crimes. Those were also dropped.
Legal representatives say she has cooperated with the investigation in the past and was never told she was considered a co-conspirator.
Copyright 2026 WFSB. All rights reserved.
Connecticut
Advocates push Connecticut lawmakers for ‘aid in dying’ legislation
A group of advocates is pushing to make Connecticut the next state to allow the practice of aid-in-dying, also known as medical assistance in dying, but they may already be running out of time this session.
The push comes as New York became the 13th state to allow aid-in-dying after Gov. Kathy Hochul signed a bill into law late last week.
A coalition called Compassion and Choices has been airing short films around the state, followed by discussions on the topic, in hopes of winning over more support.
Advocate Deltra James is a regular panelist, talking about her experience coaching people preparing for the end of their life as a death doula.
“What I see often is not so much a fear of the act of dying, but it’s a lot of fear around suffering and how they might die,” James said.
She said she sometimes helps healthy people with estate planning, but other clients are looking for support in their final days.
Deltra was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2019 and was initially given just three years to live.
After her diagnosis, she decided to become an advocate for others and discovered being a doula.
She’s among the advocates hoping to see the legislature revisit the issue. Lawmakers have tried and failed several times to allow aid-in-dying before pausing for the last few years.
Sen. Gary Winfield (D-New Haven) supports the idea but isn’t sure the legislature will have enough time.
The co-chair of the Judiciary Committee noted the body will need to take up several judicial nominations. He also expects possible bills on hot-button issues like gun control and immigration.
“The number of days is short, and as much as I’m interested in the issue, I don’t know that we’ll have the actual time for it,” he said.
Some critics remain staunchly opposed.
“It doesn’t speak well for us as a society, we should be respecting life, we should be protecting life,” Connecticut Catholic Public Affairs Conference Executive Director Chris Healy said.
Healy remains opposed on moral grounds, but he raised concerns about Canada’s experience with medical assistance in death.
Health Canada reported just 1,018 deaths in 2016, when it was first legal, but a November report said there were 16,499 deaths in 2024. That accounts for roughly 1 in 20 deaths.
Media reports indicate most of the deaths were for patients with a terminal diagnosis, but some patients cited depression or mental health issues as their reason.
“In the goodness of our hearts, we shouldn’t be turning into this, sort of, cruel culture of death that infects our society today,” Healy said.
James and others note that past proposals in Connecticut have included strict restrictions, such as requiring that someone be a Connecticut resident, at least 21 years old, and have a prognosis of six months or less to live.
James also said people are free to live according to their moral beliefs, but she does not think that should be the basis for laws limiting other people’s choices.
“It’s deeply uncomfortable that somebody else is comfortable with my suffering, or with other people’s suffering,” she said.
Connecticut
West Hartford Restaurant Cited By State Over Loitering, Smoking Violations
WEST HARTFORD, CT — An upscale Mexican eatery in West Hartford was recently fined, and its liquor license was suspended briefly due to violations cited by the state.
The state Department of Consumer Protection’s Liquor Control Commission has suspended the liquor permit for El Santo Mezcal Tequila, located at 970 Farmington Ave. in West Hartford.
The permit, state officials said, will be suspended for one day on March 23.
This action follows a resolution concerning issues identified by the state agency.
The establishment also paid a fine of $1,000 as part of the resolution.
The suspension addresses specific violations of state statutes and regulations.
These include Section 30-90, which pertains to loitering on permit premises.
Additionally, the establishment was cited under Section zzz30-6-A24 (a), which governs the conduct of permit premises and unlawful conduct, specifically referencing smoking.
The Liquor Control Commission is responsible for regulating the sale of alcoholic beverages within the state of Connecticut.
This includes issuing permits, enforcing compliance with state laws and regulations, and investigating alleged violations.
-
Politics1 week agoWhite House says murder rate plummeted to lowest level since 1900 under Trump administration
-
Alabama6 days agoGeneva’s Kiera Howell, 16, auditions for ‘American Idol’ season 24
-
Politics1 week agoTrump unveils new rendering of sprawling White House ballroom project
-
San Francisco, CA1 week agoExclusive | Super Bowl 2026: Guide to the hottest events, concerts and parties happening in San Francisco
-
Ohio1 week agoOhio town launching treasure hunt for $10K worth of gold, jewelry
-
Culture1 week agoAnnotating the Judge’s Decision in the Case of Liam Conejo Ramos, a 5-Year-Old Detained by ICE
-
Culture1 week agoIs Emily Brontë’s ‘Wuthering Heights’ Actually the Greatest Love Story of All Time?
-
News1 week agoThe Long Goodbye: A California Couple Self-Deports to Mexico