Connect with us

Connecticut

CT’s public water systems may soon need to treat for ‘forever chemicals’. It will cost millions.

Published

on

CT’s public water systems may soon need to treat for ‘forever chemicals’. It will cost millions.


Public water utilities all through Connecticut might quickly be required to put in thousands and thousands of {dollars} in new therapy expertise to assist take away “perpetually chemical substances” from the faucet water that tens of hundreds of individuals drink each day.

These upgrades will likely be essential to adjust to a brand new federal regulation that seeks to restrict individuals’s publicity to the chemical substances, often called perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances — PFAS for brief.

The newly proposed rule would, for the primary time, set up an enforceable restrict on among the most typical varieties of PFAS in public consuming water programs — a step that environmental advocates have been demanding for years.

Environmental research have proven that PFAS contamination is prevalent all through america and the remainder of the world.

Advertisement

Practically each American has some stage of the compounds of their our bodies. The chemical substances have been present in rivers, ponds, soil, aquifers and plenty of consuming water programs all through the nation.

That features traces which were present in a few of Connecticut’s largest public water programs.

The chemical properties of PFAS made them helpful in lots of manufacturing processes. The person-made compounds had been used for many years to supply issues like nonstick pans, waterproof clothes, stain-resistant carpets and an industrial fireplace combating foam that was used at airports, army bases and native fireplace stations.

PFAS are sometimes called “perpetually chemical substances” as a result of they don’t break down simply within the setting, and the compounds are recognized to construct up in individuals’s blood over time.

The chemical substances don’t pose an instantaneous threat for individuals who ingest restricted quantities by means of consuming water. However public well being officers are nonetheless involved in regards to the long-term well being implications for communities that often eat even small quantities of the chemical substances over a lifetime.

Advertisement

Epidemiological research and toxicology analysis discovered potential hyperlinks between the compounds and various damaging well being outcomes, together with developmental points, immunological issues, thyroid issues and kidney or testicular cancers.

These human well being considerations prompted the U.S. Environmental Safety Company to ascertain advisory limits for a number of varieties of PFAS in consuming water programs in 2016.

However these limits had been solely suggestions. They didn’t require public water utilities to deal with for the chemical substances, even when testing discovered important ranges of the compounds within the water.

That’s now anticipated to alter.

EPA officers introduced on March 14 that the federal company plans to implement obligatory enforcement ranges for six various kinds of PFAS which were present in public consuming water programs.

Advertisement

That regulatory announcement is an enormous step for a lot of the nation, together with Connecticut.

Up up to now, solely a handful of states, together with Maine, Michigan, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Hampshire and Vermont, enacted enforceable limits for the chemical substances of their public water programs.

The EPA’s newly proposed regulation could be obligatory nationwide, and it is going to be even stricter than a lot of the present state legal guidelines. The regulation doesn’t apply to the 322,000 personal consuming water wells in Connecticut.

The 2 most typical varieties of PFAS that will likely be regulated underneath the federal rule are chemical substances often called PFOA and PFOS. The EPA stated it is going to require public water programs so as to add new filtration expertise or discover totally different sources of water if these chemical substances are present in concentrations above 4 components per trillion.

For perspective, 1 half per trillion is akin to discovering a single drop of the chemical substances in 20 Olympic-sized swimming swimming pools.

Advertisement

That extraordinarily low restrict is being put in place in an effort to defend individuals from a lifetime of publicity to the chemical substances. However it is going to imply that many public water utilities that beforehand thought their water was acceptable will now want to change their therapy crops to cope with the chemical substances.

Christopher Bellona, a civil and environmental engineering professor on the Colorado Faculty of Mines, stated the brand new EPA regulation marks a “generational shift” in water therapy in america.

The truth that PFAS contamination is so widespread all through the nation, Bellona stated, signifies that many public water programs will quickly be required to adapt to the brand new guidelines.

“It’s a really difficult drawback, and it simply appears to be getting extra difficult as time goes on,” Bellona stated.

What it means for Connecticut

It’s unclear at this level what number of public water programs in Connecticut are supplying faucet water that comprises PFAS ranges above 4 components per trillion.

Advertisement

That’s as a result of the chemical sampling that has been carried out at public water programs in recent times was voluntary.

The Connecticut Division of Public Well being, like businesses in most different states, solely has an advisory restrict in place. That public well being advisory began at 70 components per trillion in 2016 and was lowered final 12 months to as little as 10 components per trillion.

But it surely remained merely a suggestion.

That meant the operators of public water programs weren’t required to commonly report testing outcomes for the chemical substances like they do for mercury, arsenic, lead and a host of different regulated contaminants.

State officers inspired the general public programs to conduct sampling and to voluntarily share the outcomes with the state and their water prospects. However not all of them did that.

Advertisement

There isn’t any point out of PFAS testing ends in the latest water high quality experiences for the Waterbury Water Division, the Danbury Water Division, the New Britain Water Division, the Meriden Water Division, the Bristol Water Division, the Middletown Water Division, the Southington Water Division or the Metropolitan District Fee, which provides water to roughly 390,000 individuals in Hartford and 11 different surrounding communities.

However Connecticut isn’t resistant to the issue.

A few of the state’s largest consuming water suppliers have publicly shared PFAS testing outcomes in recent times, and people outcomes point out that these utilities have pockets of PFAS contamination that may should be managed as soon as the brand new federal rule goes into impact.

The Regional Water Authority, which provides 418,000 individuals in and round New Haven, discovered PFAS concentrations simply above 4 components per trillion at a few of its wells in Cheshire, which provides roughly 3% to five% of the utility’s water.

Aquarion, an investor-owned utility that delivers water to an estimated 695,000 individuals in Connecticut, reported PFAS concentrations above 4 components per trillion in water sources that offer components of Darien, Simsbury, Danbury, Woodbury, New Fairfield, New Milford, Greenwich, Newtown and various its different native programs.

Advertisement

Connecticut Water, one other investor-owned utility that serves greater than 243,000 individuals within the state, documented comparable findings at its programs in Avon, Vernon, Brooklyn, Guilford and several other different areas.

And the Manchester Water Division, which serves greater than 51,000 individuals in that city, lately reported PFAS ranges as excessive as 21 components per trillion at one in all its water consumption areas.

‘A high precedence’

Manisha Juthani, Connecticut’s public well being commissioner, stated her company and Gov. Ned Lamont’s administration are carefully monitoring the latest testing outcomes from the state’s public water programs.

“This has been a high precedence for this governor, for this administration,” Juthani advised the Connecticut Mirror.

Juthani, who was appointed because the state’s high well being official in 2021, acknowledged that Connecticut doesn’t have up-to-date testing outcomes for each neighborhood water system within the state. However she estimated that roughly 65% of the programs are reporting PFAS outcomes voluntarily to DPH, even when they aren’t sharing the outcomes publicly with their prospects but.

Advertisement

About 37% of people who reported have ranges above the 4 components per trillion threshold, she stated. She wouldn’t determine which programs these are.

In line with Juthani, federal officers lately advised her company the brand new limits for PFAS in consuming water may very well be rolled out over a three-year interval to offer state regulators and public water utilities sufficient time to adjust to the laws.

Connecticut is probably going in a greater place than many different states, Juthani argued, due to the general public consideration PFAS has acquired in recent times. She stated DPH has additionally been in communication with the general public water suppliers in regards to the potential for extra laws surrounding the chemical substances.

“I do suppose we’re forward of the sport, however we actually received’t know the total scope of the issue till we’ve got the info,” Juthani stated.

Officers with Aquarion and Connecticut Water, the 2 investor-owed utilities within the state, stated they acknowledge the necessity for enforceable limits on PFAS, which is why they’ve started voluntarily testing for the chemical substances a number of years in the past and publicly disclosing the outcomes to their prospects.

Advertisement

“Connecticut Water helps the EPA’s and Connecticut Division of Public Well being’s efforts to guard the standard of consuming water, and it’ll proceed to carefully monitor EPA’s proposal and can put money into therapy programs or take different actions as wanted, to stay in compliance with water high quality requirements,” Daniel Meaney, the corporate’s spokesman, wrote in a press release.

Aquarion additionally famous the numerous value that will likely be required to carry the entire public water programs into compliance with the brand new guidelines.

“Whereas many particulars stay to be finalized, it’s clear that sustained capital funding in infrastructure and a long-term dedication to therapy will likely be wanted to each adjust to the proposed regulatory requirements and make sure the security of shoppers’ water,” the corporate wrote in a press release.

Peter Fazekas, a spokesman for Aquarion, stated the corporate doesn’t but have an estimate of how a lot it is going to value to scale back PFAS in its consuming water programs. However he offered an instance of a latest improve the corporate accomplished at one in all its water therapy crops in New Hampshire.

That improve, which added a sophisticated filtration system to a single nicely, value the corporate $1.7 million to finish, Fazekas stated, and that doesn’t embody the price of ongoing upkeep to maintain the system working.

Advertisement

Therapy choices

There may be expertise accessible that’s able to filtering PFAS out of public consuming water provides, and people programs are already in industrial use in different components of the nation the place a lot greater concentrations of the chemical substances polluted public consuming water.

Bellona, the environmental engineering professor from Colorado, stated the 2 most typical therapy programs for PFAS require water to be run by means of giant filters containing “granular activated carbon” or “ion alternate resins.”

Each of these substances, he stated, take in PFAS because the consuming water passes by means of the filters. However each programs are moderately costly, Bellona stated, and they’re far totally different from different steps that historically happen at water therapy crops.

“I’d think about using absorbents to deal with water to be a sophisticated therapy course of,” he stated. “It’s not easy.”

Bellona has firsthand expertise in placing these superior processes to make use of. He personally helped the general public water utility in Fountain, Colo., take a look at a carbon filtration system to take away PFAS from that metropolis’s water provide in 2017.

Advertisement

These trials in the end led to town constructing a brand new multimillion-dollar therapy plant to completely clear its consuming water. That undertaking was financed, nevertheless, by the U.S. Air Drive, which was liable for polluting town’s water wells with the commercial firefighting foam.

The general public water programs in Connecticut usually are not going to have that supply of cash accessible to them. However state well being officers stated there’s more likely to be different federal cash accessible.

The federal Bipartisan Infrastructure Legislation, which was handed in late 2021, included thousands and thousands of {dollars} in funding for PFAS therapy at public water programs.

Connecticut well being officers stated there’s roughly $18.8 million accessible this 12 months by means of the state’s Ingesting Water State Revolving Fund that can be utilized to fund PFAS therapy initiatives. And state officers stated extra funding is more likely to develop into accessible within the coming years.

Juthani stated that federal funding will assist to make sure that public water programs can adjust to the brand new federal laws with out charging prospects for your entire value.

Advertisement

Andrew Brown is a reporter for The Connecticut Mirror (https://ctmirror.org/ ). Copyright 2023 © The Connecticut Mirror.



Source link

Connecticut

STORM WATCH: Heavy snow followed by deep freeze in Connecticut

Published

on

STORM WATCH: Heavy snow followed by deep freeze in Connecticut


Here’s what you need to know:

  • Snow will become heavy at times between 5-9 p.m.
  • Peak snowfall rates of 1-2 inches per hour are possible
  • Snow showers will linger through 1-3 a.m.
  • Wetter snowfall closer to the coast, fluffy in Litchfield County
  • Arctic cold moves in for snow cleanup Monday morning
  • Bright but very cold with 20s for highs and teens for lows

Tonight: Moderate to heavy snow. Colder. Breezy. Lows near 17.


Monday: AM slick spots, sunny. Cold. Highs near 24. Lows near 6.



Tuesday: Partly sunny. Arctic cold. Highs near 18. Lows near 8.

Wednesday: Mostly sunny. Very cold. Highs near 20. Lows near 10.


Thursday: Partly cloudy. Highs near 25. Lows near 21.

Friday: Mostly sunny. Not as cold. Highs near 30. Lows near 24.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

PHOTOS: Winter storm hits Connecticut

Published

on

PHOTOS: Winter storm hits Connecticut


NEW HAVEN, Conn. (WTNH) — A winter storm is hitting Connecticut Sunday afternoon, bringing the first significant snow of the season. The majority of the state will likely see 4-8 inches, while the higher terrain of northwest and northeast parts of the state may see 8+ inches.

Connecticut Weather Radar

The winter storm is expected to continue impacting the state into early Monday morning. Get the latest forecast information here.

Updated list of closings and delays

Advertisement

Share your weather photos and videos with News 8. We may feature them in newscasts! Mobile app users, click here.

Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to WTNH.com.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Face the Facts: What Prospect Medical Holdings bankruptcy could mean for you

Published

on

Face the Facts: What Prospect Medical Holdings bankruptcy could mean for you


After three years of trying to purchase three Connecticut hospitals, Yale New Haven Health is starting to walk away from a deal with Prospect Holdings.

The state tried to help broker that deal with Prospect, but it declared bankruptcy this past week.

So what does that mean for patients and their doctors? NBC Connecticut’s Mike Hydeck spoke with Senator Jeff Gordon (R-Woodstock), who is also a medical doctor by trade, to provide some perspective.

Mike Hydeck: So let’s start with this deal. Why do you think it fell through? Are any of these three hospitals in danger of closing or having to layoff staff? Where does it go from here?

Advertisement

Jeff Gordon: There’s a real danger. They can close and layoff staff if this does not get solved quickly. The bankruptcy proceedings that Prospect’s in give some protections, but I really want to see Yale, which is still interested in purchasing the hospitals, be able to do that, keep the doors open so nobody loses their jobs, people get their paychecks, and patients get the care.

Mike Hydeck: So for people who don’t know how states and the federal government are involved in this. We’re actually a creditor in Prospect Holdings, I guess, loan to try to mitigate their finances. The State of Connecticut is. We have a vested interest in trying to see this deal go through, correct?

Jeff Gordon: Oh, absolutely. We are a major creditor. They owe a lot of money in back taxes they haven’t paid, and we have a huge interest in making certain people get the care they need at each one of these hospitals, and nobody loses their job as a result.

Mike Hydeck: So are there federal regulations they have to follow, too, in a deal like this? Because healthcare is a necessity in some of those hospitals in rural areas, and if they go away, that’s a big impact.

Jeff Gordon: There are some federal laws, but it’s really up to the state of Connecticut, and this is where the state of Connecticut really needs to take action now. I believe it should have taken action earlier, but it has to absolutely now, and hopefully we’ll do that in a time frame that’s relatively short.

Advertisement

Mike Hydeck: So in Yale New Haven’s releases on this topic, they said, ‘Look, when we started digging through the finances and we walked through the facilities, we saw the facilities were poorly maintained or not maintained at all. There was mismanagement throughout the organization.’ You’ve probably read the report. Is that a fair characterization? And then how does the state help to mitigate something like this?

Jeff Gordon: I believe that’s a fair characterization. We’re learning more and more that these for-profit private equities have not been telling the truth. A huge congressional report came out this month highlighting that nationally. So we’re going to uncover a lot of the facts during this bankruptcy protection. Yale does have a very valid point, but this highlights why the state needs to take action now. We can’t let it slide any lower.

Mike Hydeck: So when you go to buy a house or you go to buy a business, you do your due diligence. Did it take three years to go through this paperwork? It seems like a long time. Maybe it’s a complex transaction, so it takes longer than your average transaction, but is that a long period of time to try to get that data and understand the circumstances of what you’re about to purchase?

Jeff Gordon: Oh, absolutely it is. In fact, in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, they get more complicated things done with hospitals in a shorter time frame than, evidently, the Office of Health Strategy was able to. And that’s why one of my bills, Putting Patients Over Profits, and another bill on certificate of need is trying to reform this, so we don’t get into these lengthy delays of approvals. And now look what happens.

Mike Hydeck: So that’ll include a timeline when a deal like this is done?

Advertisement

Jeff Gordon: A 180-day timeline, very strict. Massachusetts and Rhode Island get it done within those timelines. Why can’t Connecticut?

Mike Hydeck: Well, who’s to blame here? Is the purchaser of these three hospitals not going through the paperwork fast enough? Or is the state holding something up, in your estimation?

Jeff Gordon: I believe it’s been the state holding it up. It’s a complicated deal, but if you really talk with folks involved, sure Prospect wasn’t being forthcoming with everything it should have been, but the state really was very delaying this, and we were pushing the state very much so to approve the deal. It just took way too long, and I’ve never gotten any good answers about why, and that’s why we need to reform this, because we can’t let these things happen and then look what happens now. We’re dealing with hospitals that are on the edge.

Mike Hydeck: So does that agency need to be reformed? Do they need more accountants so they can go through everything? How do you fix it? Like if it’s their problem, how would you like to see that department changed so this doesn’t happen again?

Jeff Gordon: There needs to be very serious reform for certificate of need. I, along with some fellow senators, have a very serious proposal, once again, to reform it. Common sense, simple things we can get done, and I’m hopeful we can get it done, but we just have to fight the bureaucracy to make certain that it’s reformed in the right way.

Advertisement

Mike Hydeck: Now, at a recent news conference, Governor Lamont said, ‘Look, if this sale falls through, there are other people lining up to buy this.’ But does that start the clock at zero again?

Jeff Gordon: Yes, it could. And we’ve heard, well, we can streamline that review. Well, if it could be streamlined now, why couldn’t have been streamlined before? It’s double talk. I hope Yale will end up buying. I’ve spoken with Yale. They are interested. We have to deal with the bankruptcy court, of course, but if we have to go to somebody else, look what happened in Massachusetts with the far worse situation, with Stuart Health. That became a massive, expensive mess, and they lost two hospitals, despite the state stepping in.

Mike Hydeck: I hope that doesn’t happen here.

Jeff Gordon: I hope not.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending