Connect with us

Connecticut

CT Republicans to seek laws regarding trans students, athletes

Published

on

CT Republicans to seek laws regarding trans students, athletes


A number of Republican lawmakers and advocates on Wednesday came out in favor of legislative proposals that would require schools to notify parents when their children want to be referred to by a new set of pronouns and that would require student athletes to compete in sports based on their assigned gender at birth.

Members of the Let Kids Be Kids coalition, an organization formed to “encourage legislators to protect children,” according to its website, argued that these bills were necessary to protect the rights of children.

The first bill would force schools to disclose to parents if their child were being addressed with different pronouns than what they were given at birth.

“Kids are best protected when parents are involved,” said Peter Wolfgang, the president of the Family Institute of Connecticut, a group that has also advocated for restrictions on abortion in Connecticut. “The state should not come between parents and their children.”

Advertisement

The coalition of elected officials, religious leaders and parents who support the bill argue that schools should not have the option to hide information pertaining to their child’s gender identity, and they claimed that under the current guidelines from the Department of Education, schools are encouraged to hide the status of children’s identities.

These bills are similar to the efforts of Republican legislators across the country to pass legislation regarding transgender youth. In 2023, Republicans across the country introduced more than 500 bills regarding LGBTQ youths, with 48 passing.

There are at least six states with legislation requiring schools to disclose if their child goes by a different identity than what they were assigned at birth. At the start of the 2023 legislative season, more than 150 bills in 25 states had been proposed regarding transgender youth.

“This is merely a parental notification bill. That’s all we’re asking for at this point,” Rep. Anne Dauphinais, R-Killingly, said. “All kinds of things are going on with your children, and parents have no idea.”

Current guidelines say that “there is no law that specifically requires districts or schools to inform parents or guardians of a student’s gender identity or expression.” The guidelines also emphasize the importance of open communication between parents and school districts.

Advertisement

Opponents of the bill argue that it would increase the presence of the government in raising children and raised concerns about the potential harm that could come with forcing school districts to disclose gender identity to parents.

“As a parent, and like any parent, I want my child to share things with me, and to know what’s happening in their life. And I want to know that, even when they may not be ready to share with me, that they have the support they need at school,” Melissa Combs, founder of the Out Accountability Project, said in a statement.

“Outing students without their consent forces schools to intrude on family relationships like mine, taking away opportunities for important family conversations. Who invites the government to their dinner table? No one,” Combs added. Outing is when someone’s sexual identity is shared without their consent.

The second bill, titled “Save Women’s Sports,” would make athletes participate in sports teams for the gender they were assigned at birth. Twenty-five states have laws banning transgender athletes from participating in high school sports consistent with their gender identity.

“It’s about protecting women and girls.” Rep. Mark Anderson, R-Granby, said. “If you’re for women’s rights, then you must be for protecting women’s sports”

Advertisement

Combs disagreed.

“If Connecticut truly wants to support girls’ sports, they would be providing more funding, creating more opportunities to play, and enacting stronger laws that protect female athletes from harassment and abuse — not banning transgender youth from participating in school sports with their peers.”

Each proposed bill has five cosponsors, all House Republicans: Anderson, Rep. Joe Hoxha of Bristol, Rep. Brian Lanoue of Griswold, Rep. Donna Veach of Southington and Dauphinais. The bills will be referred to the education committee, but they are unlikely to gain traction in the legislature, which is dominated by Democrats.

“I have not examined them in detail, but we are not looking to enact anything in Connecticut which is part of a right wing agenda nationally,” said Senate President Pro Tem Martin Looney, D-New Haven, when asked about the two bills.

Advertisement





Source link

Connecticut

I-95 in Connecticut fully reopens after fiery petroleum tanker crash damages road

Published

on

I-95 in Connecticut fully reopens after fiery petroleum tanker crash damages road


NORWALK, Conn. (WFSB/Gray News) – Interstate 95 in Connecticut fully reopened Sunday morning following a fiery petroleum tanker crash last week.

The crash involved three vehicles, including the tanker and another tractor-trailer in Norwalk around 5:30 a.m. Thursday morning. Police say a car was merging onto 95 South when it collided with a tanker truck.

The tanker truck then collided with a tractor-trailer before bursting into flames under the Fairfield Avenue overpass.

Officials said no one was injured.

Advertisement

However, the crash shut down the highway and slowed traffic in lower Fairfield County and around Connecticut.

The Connecticut Department of Transportation and its contractors got the highway fully reopened in less than 80 hours.

Governor Ned Lamont and Connecticut Transportation Commissioner Garrett Eucalitto made the announcement Sunday morning.

“It is truly amazing that in less than 80 hours from that fiery crash Thursday that shut down traffic in both directions, the highway again is fully open,” Lamont said.

The bridge was heavily damaged when a tanker truck caught fire after it was involved in a crash Thursday morning.

Advertisement

The governor said southbound lanes of the highway would remain closed to vehicles through the day on Sunday, May 5, to allow those lanes to be milled and repaved.

To view camera footage of the demolition, click here.

“Completely removing that bridge in less than 36 hours is an impressive feat and is credit to the hard work and dedication of the contractors and Connecticut Department of Transportation crews, who are pushing to get the entire highway fully reopened in both directions by Monday morning,” Governor Lamont said.

Governor Lamont declared a state of emergency to speed up reconstruction.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Is CT’s economy ‘growing’? It depends on how you define it

Published

on

Is CT’s economy ‘growing’? It depends on how you define it


“We have more people employed” is one of the many things Gov. Ned Lamont touted earlier this week in response to a claim that Connecticut’s economy is continuously weakening.

The criticism came from Fred Carstensen, a professor and economist at the University of Connecticut who heads the Connecticut Center for Economic Analysis, and it was asked during a one-on-one interview on Tuesday between The Connecticut Mirror and Lamont.

“Right now, we have the fastest growing economy in the northeast by a little bit,” Lamont continued.

But what makes an economy “grow” and be “fast”? It depends on whom you ask, and it’s often more complicated than looking at one single measure. One might consider inflation, income distribution, cost-of-living, total output, exports and many other factors, each of which paints a different picture of the state’s economy.

Advertisement

One common way to look at it, though, is by considering employment — how many people are working, how many are eligible, how many are looking to work and so forth.

Lamont said that there are more people employed now than before. Is that true? According to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, it depends on the time frame. The average number of people employed in 2023 in Connecticut was 1.822 million, which is a:

• 0.63% decrease from the 2022 average (1.833 million → 1.822)

• 2.16% decrease from 2019 (1.862 million → 1.822)

• 6% increase from 2013 (1.718 million → 1.822)

Advertisement

• 5.7% increase since 2000 (1.723 million → 1.822)

More people are employed in Connecticut than decades ago, but that’s normal of any state that’s seeing an increase in population.

While the number of employed people grew in the state by 5.7% since 2000, the 16-and-over population increased by 12% — a difference not unexpected, as Connecticut’s population is aging, along with other factors.

Another measure that shows this relationship is the employment to population ratio. In 2000, the ratio of employed people to the total population was 65%. In 2023, it was 61.8%. Decreases were seen for every other New England state as well.

Shorter-term, there were fewer people employed last year than before the pandemic in 2019, when Connecticut saw a record number of workers at 1.862 million. All New England states except Rhode Island experienced a decrease in the number of workers since 2019.

Advertisement

The portion of the population that isn’t working could be either not part of the labor force or unemployed. The number of people that are unemployed or looking for a job out of the entire labor force makes up the unemployment rate.

The 2023 unemployment rate for Connecticut was 3.8%, the highest in New England, but any “unemployment rate around 4% would be considered low by historic standards,” writes a researcher from the state’s Department of Labor in the March 2024 edition of the Connecticut Economic Digest.

The unemployment rate has been falling since 2020, a sign of recovery from the pandemic, but the rate is still slightly higher than before the pandemic, a trend also seen for Massachusetts but not for any other New England state. In 2019, the unemployment rate in Connecticut was 3.6% while in 2023 it was 3.8%.

The 2023 unemployment rate is not as low as levels seen in 2000, when it reached 2.1%, but it’s still lower than the 4.9% rate seen in 1990.

Some argue that an increasing unemployment rate can be a good thing, despite its negative connotation. In a September 2022 national analysis, a time when the unemployment rate rose, the chief economist at the U.S. Department of Labor at the time wrote that, “The unemployment rate rose for a positive reason — more unemployed workers began seeking jobs.”

Advertisement

If more people are joining the labor force by looking for a job, the unemployment rate will go up, since there will be more people classified as “unemployed.”

There’s also a measure known as the labor force participation rate, which combines both measures discussed above: The employed plus the unemployed as a share of the total working age population.

In 1990, Connecticut’s labor force participation rate was 70.6%, but last year it sat at 64.2%. This decades-long decreasing trend is also seen for other New England states and is associated with an aging population and a decrease in participation from certain groups of men, as explained by researchers from the U.S. Census Bureau and the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.

In recent years though, the 2023 participation rate has recovered from a historic low in 2021, but it is not yet back to levels seen in 2019 before the pandemic, where the rate was 66.3%, just 2.1 percentage points higher than last year’s rate.

So what does this all mean? Lamont was right in that there are more workers now than decades ago, but that’s expected if the population of a state is growing. But when taking that into account, the number of workers is not increasing as fast as the 16-and-older population. As of last year, employment numbers and labor force participation rates for the state are still not at pre-pandemic levels, and the unemployment rate is higher, although decreasing.

Advertisement

And among New England states, Connecticut last year had the highest unemployment rate and the third-lowest labor force participation rate, but it wasn’t the only New England state to see decreases.



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Must Connecticut subsidize more illegal immigration?

Published

on

Must Connecticut subsidize more illegal immigration?


Connecticut’s state government seems to think that illegal immigration isn’t a problem here, just – maybe – in other states. The other day state officials gathered with advocates of illegal…

Purchase a Subscription and Register

Advertisement
Previous articleProtests should target issues close to home
Next articleFormer residenttrooper lays out case for hiring a 2nd trooper in Kent



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending