Connect with us

Connecticut

Connecticut lawmakers debate spending remaining COVID-19 funds, forgoing changes to state budget

Published

on

Connecticut lawmakers debate spending remaining COVID-19 funds, forgoing changes to state budget


HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — Facing a Dec. 31 deadline, Connecticut lawmakers were on track Tuesday to approve a Democratic plan to spend at least $360 million in remaining federal COVID-19 pandemic funds on key areas, including higher education, not-for-profit social service agencies, municipal aid and children’s mental health.

Democrats, who control the General Assembly, argued the final allotment of the approximately $2.8 billion Connecticut received through the American Rescue Plan Act, coupled with state surplus funds, was enough to address the state’s needs. Therefore, they argued, the second year of the two-year $51 billion state budget, which passed last year, should not be renegotiated.

They also said revisiting the $26 billion budget that’s already in place for the new fiscal year beginning July 1 would have proved challenging because it’s only about $1 million below the state’s mandatory cap on spending.

Advertisement

People are also reading…

“To open the budget would have led to a parade of difficult decisions,” said House Speaker Matt Ritter, who defended the unusual decision from Republican criticisms.

Advertisement

“We had a good underlying budget,” he told reporters. “If we can do really good budgets and we have to make very minor changes, that’s not a bad thing. Actually, I think it shows predictability and sustainability.”

The House of Representatives passed the legislation, which Democrats dubbed a budget “stabilization bill,” 103-48, with five Republicans joining the majority Democrats. The bill was being debated Tuesday night in the Senate, where it was expected to pass.

Republicans in the House and Senate argued the Democrats’ plan sets the state up for tax increases in the next two-year budget because it spends some of the one-time federal COVID-19 funds on continuing expenses. Republican Sen. Eric Berthel predicted future budget deficits, accusing Democrats of using “budget gimmicks” from the past to avoid caps on state spending and revenues.

“This document, I believe, is setting Connecticut up for failure next year and beyond,” he said. “And by failure, I mean deficits.”

Democratic Sen. Cathy Osten, co-chair of the legislature’s budget-writing committee, insisted the state is “not facing fiscal calamity under any circumstances,” despite the GOP’s warnings.

Advertisement

“We are not fiscally irresponsible in this state. We are not,” Osten said. “We have done a damn good job of taking care of issues, and we have paid down our debt and we have money in the bank.”

Osten pushed back on claims that tens of millions of dollars were being spent on state operating expenses. She said representatives from the University of Connecticut and the state university system have been told the $80 million each is set to receive is not intended for ongoing expenses. Also, she said the $50 million for nonprofit agencies that provide state services is not supposed to be used for operating costs.

Republicans on Tuesday also criticized the bill for including numerous budget adjustments they said should have gone through the regular legislative process.

“It’s difficult to really say with a straight face that this is not a budgetary process. It’s impacting revenue, it’s impacting spending,” House Minority Leader Vincent Candelora said. “I would hope that the governor would pause and have somebody do that analysis before he signs this document.”

The House GOP sent a letter to Democratic Attorney General William Tong, asking him to weigh in on whether the legislations constitutes a budget adjustment under the state constitution, which obligates lawmakers to maintain a balanced state budget. Tong’s office said it was reviewing the request.

Advertisement

The General Assembly is scheduled to adjourn its legislative session at midnight on Wednesday.

Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

Advertisement



Source link

Connecticut

Alicia (Plikaitis) Helen Junghans Obituary

Published

on

Alicia (Plikaitis) Helen Junghans Obituary


It is with profound sadness that we announce the passing of Alicia Helen (Plikaitis) Junghans, 80, of Ellington, Connecticut. Alicia passed away peacefully in hospice care at UCONN Health on May 7, 2026, after a courageous 15-year battle…



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Body recovered from Connecticut River near Chester-Lyme Ferry, DEEP says

Published

on

Body recovered from Connecticut River near Chester-Lyme Ferry, DEEP says


LYME — A body was recovered from the Connecticut River on Saturday, according to officials from the state Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. 

At about 1 p.m., a vessel on the river reported seeing a body in the area of the Chester-Lyme Ferry, DEEP said.

The Environmental Conservation Police, along with the Connecticut State Police Major Crimes Unit and Lyme and Cheshire fire departments, responded to the area and recovered the body, DEEP said. The body has been sent to the state chief medical examiner, DEEP said. 

Bill Flood, a media relations manager for DEEP, said the body was identified as a male and appeared to have been in the water for an extended period of time.

Advertisement

The medical examiner will determine the manner of death and EnCon is investigating, Flood said, noting there is no believed threat to the public. 

This is a developing story and will be updated.



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Sorry New York And Chicago, Connecticut Has A Pizza License Plate Now – Jalopnik

Published

on

Sorry New York And Chicago, Connecticut Has A Pizza License Plate Now – Jalopnik






Even as a born-and-raised New Yorker, I have a relatively open mind when it comes to pizza. When I’m out on the road, I’ll eat at any pizzeria as long as I can see the oven from the counter and buy pizza by the slice. However, the idea of any place outside the Big Apple proclaiming itself “the Pizza Capital of the United States” is just sacrilege. Connecticut doubled down on its ludicrous claim last weekend by approving the rollout of a special “Pizza State” license plate. This is the worst affront to the craft since Chicagoans started shilling their crust-bowl casserole as pizza.

Let’s actually take a look at this license plate. One peek, we all know the rules. “The Pizza State” plate features a similar blue-to-white gradient as on the standard Connecticut license plate. The aforementioned self-proclaimed moniker replaces the state’s official nickname, “The Constitution State,” beneath the plate number. To the right of the number is an image of a pizza slice ripped straight from Microsoft’s ClipArt library. It’s a flat image that looks nothing like what’s served in New Haven. Connecticut drivers will be able to pick up a “Pizza State” plate for $65.

Advertisement

This is a pizza war for good

The only undisputedly good aspect of the “Pizza State” license plate is that its introduction will help feed Connecticut’s hungry. According to CT Insider, the $28.6 billion budget bill approved by the Connecticut General Assembly last weekend, which authorized the plate, also directly appropriated funding to Connecticut Foodshare. The sitewide food bank will also receive $50 from each $65 license plate fee, as it continues to provide millions of free meals to food-insecure people.

Back to the pizza debate at the heart of the matter. Governor Ned Lamont declared Connecticut the country’s pizza capital back in 2024 as part of a marketing campaign to promote the state. That declaration could have grounds for war in a different century, but individual states apparently don’t fight wars against each other anymore. Connecticut had better go back to being a UConn Husky-obsessed suburb before New York makes Greenwich the next Toledo.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending