Boston, MA
Jacob Wirth, the Bierhaus That Burned Down. Twice.
Longform
Will the 150-year-old Jacob Wirth collapse under the heat, or can it rise from the ashes once again?
It was a total loss from the start.
On June 24, Boston fire crews rushed over to Jacob Wirth, a restaurant on Stuart Street about a block from the Common. News footage showed red-hot flames shooting toward the sky as geysers of thick black smoke choked the night air, transforming the Theater District landmark, known for its old-school German fare and lively atmosphere, into a scene of destruction.
They arrived just before 11 p.m. to battle the four-alarm blaze engulfing the 180-year-old structure, aiming “big lines” and “blitz guns,” according to the Boston Fire Department report. After firefighters were ordered out of the three-story building due to holes in the floor, multiple fire companies stationed on the upper levels of a next-door parking garage and on the street below beat back the flames in both directions.
More than an hour later, the worst of the blaze was over, but firefighters stayed on the scene until 8 a.m. to extinguish hot spots throughout the building, and Stuart Street remained closed to traffic until the early afternoon. When the fire was finally out, the destruction was almost inconceivable. “The bar was pretty much charred from the top down,” said Jamison LaGuardia, vice president of sales and operations at Royale Entertainment Group, who, along with several others, purchased the restaurant in early 2023. The building’s roof was also destroyed—a social media post from the Boston Fire Department on June 25 showed four gaping holes and cracked tiles on the building’s roof—while inside, water from the sprinklers and fire hoses drenched the floors, which then sat damp and moldy for weeks in the summer heat, LaGuardia said. Early estimates put the damage at some $3 million. Though the fire’s cause remains under investigation, one thing was clear: Jacob Wirth had been destroyed.
Oddly enough, this wasn’t the first devastating fire at the property: Shortly after it was put up for sale in June 2018, the iconic German restaurant had burst into flames. (The cause of that fire was listed as “undetermined,” though human involvement was not suspected.) At the time of the second fire, LaGuardia and the rest of the new ownership team were in the process of readying the restaurant for a comeback. In fact, they say, Jacob Wirth was less than three months from reopening—a general manager had been hired, kitchen equipment had been scheduled for delivery, and a new logo had been designed.
Now, it might not be ready for a number of years. “I don’t want to give the impression that we’ve given up. Quite the opposite,” says Jacob Simmons, the vice president of project management at City Realty, another Jacob Wirth owner. Yet speaking in early fall through a palpable sense of frustration and grief, LaGuardia and Simmons struggled to articulate a path forward. Which begs the question: What will become of this celebrated throwback to a Boston long gone?
An immigrant from the Rhineland, Jacob Wirth arrived in the United States during the 1830s and opened a bar on Eliot Street (now Stuart Street) in 1868. After a decade, he moved his business across the street to its current location. The restaurant drew a diverse clientele, including families, and served unpretentious, steam-cooked German favorites—think herring and sauerbraten—without hurting patrons’ wallets, wrote urban planning scholar James O’Connell in his book Dining Out in Boston. In its early years, the restaurant, operated by Wirth’s relatives until 1965 and purchased by the Fitzgerald family in 1975, offered a male-dominated social environment and appealed to Boston beer drinkers as the city’s first Anheuser-Busch distributor.
German restaurants were particularly attractive to diners searching for new flavors, says Andrew Haley, a cultural historian and author of Turning the Tables, which recounts the story of American restaurants in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. “After the Civil War in the late 1860s and 1870s, we were increasingly seeing some interest among the general population in culinary adventurism,” Haley notes. “German restaurants became one of the first places that people ventured out to try something a little exotic.”
These were not fine-dining establishments frequented by wealthy city-dwellers, but they offered a rustic experience for open-minded working people who did not mind sometimes eating in a basement. Haley writes about a New York Times journalist who found that in the 1870s, a hearty five-course meal cost just 35 cents at a German restaurant (a little more than $8 today).
Like other cities in the latter half of the 19th century, Boston saw an increase in ethnic and immigrant-owned restaurants that catered to diners willing to expand their palates. A database developed through the Boston College history department shows 13 German-run restaurants in Boston by 1895. “The city [was] becoming more cosmopolitan, not some Yankee port town,” O’Connell says.
But trouble lay ahead for German restaurants in the later half of the 19th century and beyond, as large waves of immigrants from around the world settled in the United States with their culinary traditions in tow, providing American diners with more options for a night out. Between 1870 and 1900, according to the Library of Congress, the United States welcomed almost 12 million newcomers—primarily from Germany, England, and Ireland, but also a sizable population from China. “German food [was] not so much in decline but losing its distinctive spot almost from the moment it became popular,” says Haley, noting that the increasing ubiquity of other cultural foods diminished its popularity.
In the first half of the 20th century, the national ban on alcohol and two world wars dealt three successive blows to German dining. During and immediately following World War I, anti-German sentiment in the United States led German immigrants—at that time the largest non-English-speaking minority group in the nation—to hide their heritage for fear of retribution. American propaganda targeted Germany (“Beat back the Hun with Liberty Bonds”) through posters and flyers; the names of German foods were changed. This virulent strain of nativism included at least one public execution when, in 1918, Robert Prager, a German immigrant and bakery worker who was falsely accused of being a German spy, was hanged on a hackberry tree by a large crowd in southwestern Illinois.
Just two years later, the start of Prohibition dealt a financial blow to German restaurants by depriving them of beer imports. And by the early 1940s, anti-German attitudes were reignited by American involvement in World War II, which led many German Americans to assimilate rather than publicly embrace their heritage.
Here in Boston, though, Jacob Wirth survived, even as it suffered during the 1970s and 1980s due to skyrocketing crime and flourishing adult entertainment in the nearby Combat Zone. As Boston’s de facto red-light district, the heavily patrolled enclave offered prostitution, illegal drugs, and porn theaters while scaring away tourists and families. Sex and stabbings were the currency down Washington Street, and sordid tales of unchecked corruption in what resembled a police state did little to attract diners hungry for Old World cuisine. And yet Jacob Wirth found ways to keep the lights on.
By 1989, city leaders had approved plans to revitalize the Combat Zone, but it didn’t save Jacob Wirth in the long run. Shortly after the Washington Post published a death knell for German cuisine in 2018, detailing a litany of historic German restaurants that had closed their doors in recent years, former Jacob Wirth owner Kevin Fitzgerald announced he, too, was throwing in the towel, placing Jacob Wirth on the market for just north of a million dollars. While Fitzgerald initially cited his divorce as the reason for the sale, it seems as though a perfect storm of personal and financial troubles—including $1.43 million owed to more than 40 creditors—ultimately pushed Jacob Wirth onto the market. Bankruptcy court records show that, by late 2017, Fitzgerald’s Jacob Wirth Restaurant Company owed more than $68,000 in back pay to 25 employees (excluding the more than $10,000 owed to Fizgerald himself). One former restaurant worker filed an affidavit claiming he resigned in 2017 “because Jacob Wirth refused to pay me my wages.” Additionally, court filings reveal that the company owed $412,000 to the IRS, $175,130 to the Massachusetts Department of Revenue, and more than $50,000 in back rent.
Coupled with the June 2018 fire while the property was still on the market, it seemed like the end of Jacob Wirth. Then, last year, a group of six business partners and real estate investors came to the rescue, purchasing the beleaguered restaurant. City Realty, a Boston real estate firm, was charged with construction and development, while Royale Entertainment was set to run operations. The team was in the middle of renovations when the second fire tore through the property, giving it the distinction of being perhaps the unluckiest restaurant in Boston.
Even if the new ownership team does manage to rebuild, another question looms large: Could Jacob Wirth ever shake off the dust—both literally and metaphorically—to reclaim its spot as a cultural force in the city? Some food historians aren’t so sure. Haley believes that while there is some taste for more-modern German food among the public, Jacob Wirth would likely struggle trying to re-create what it once was. After all, says former Boston restaurant critic Corby Kummer, now a senior editor at the Atlantic and executive director of food and society at the Aspen Institute, “What Jacob Wirth had that made it so valuable was atmosphere. This old-time urban bar setting: rough and ready, hearty and fun.”
If, and when, it ever reopens, Jacob Wirth would not be the only game in town for German fare, though quality options remain few and far between. Bronwyn, a German and Central European–inspired eatery in Somerville’s Union Square, was opened in May 2013 by award-winning chef Tim Wiechmann and his wife, the restaurant’s namesake. Meanwhile, Karl’s Sausage Kitchen, a European grocer and Peabody institution since 1958, has weathered a national downturn in public demand for German cuisine by offering high-quality products and emphasizing authenticity, says co-owner Anita Gokey. “We have really stayed true to the German sausage-making traditions,” she explains.
Gokey, who co-owns Karl’s with her husband, welcomes regular customers from all over New England: German immigrants who still cook traditional fare, the descendants of German immigrants who remember bratwursts and frankfurters from their childhoods. But the art and labor of sausage-making is hard to pass on, she says, and a controversial Massachusetts law banning the sale of pork from pigs kept in tightly confined spaces has negatively affected food costs. “It’s like death by a thousand cuts between all of the expenses, the regulations, and the labor costs,” she says.
Despite the financial and cultural challenges, the owners of Jacob Wirth are resolute about reopening someday, believing there is still public demand for the restaurant. “People have reached out over the past year and a half to say how important [Jacob Wirth] was to them, that their grandfather was an original waiter, or that their parents had their first date there,” LaGuardia says. “People have so many memories, and it’s such a staple in the Boston scene that it’s made it more personal for us.”
Indeed, Reddit threads attest to the nostalgia many Bostonians feel for the dining institution. “NO!!! NOT JACOB WIRTH!!!” one person posted shortly after the fire. “This one hits hard.” Replied another: “I bike down Stuart Street on my way to work and was devastated to see all the windows blown out this morning. It’s such a beautiful building and an important piece of history, but I’m afraid this might be the last nail in the coffin. Feels like a stretch, but I hope it still comes back someday.”
A spokesperson from the city’s Office of Historic Preservation issued a statement that Boston is committed to rebuilding Jacob Wirth and working alongside architects, historians, and the current owners. The office described the “cherished Boston landmark” as an essential part of city history, an institution that “represents the legacy of generations who have contributed to the cultural and architectural tapestry of our city.”
Still, make no mistake: Reviving the restaurant demands deep pockets and a monumental effort—a daunting task that leaves many Bostonians hoping the elusive dream of Jacob Wirth hasn’t gone up in smoke forever.
First published in the print edition of Boston magazine’s November 2024 with the headline, “The Bierhaus That Burned Down. Twice.”
Boston, MA
Celtics News: Boston Odds On Favorite to Win NBA Cup
The Boston Celtics are off to a strong start to the 2024-25 season. They have a 9-2 record and will look to add an NBA Cup trophy to the mix.
The Celtics will kick off their quest for their first NBA Cup on Tuesday when they take on the Atlanta Hawks at home.
Boston has a lot going right for them, and to no one’s surprise, according to FanDuel, they have the best odds to win the 2024 NBA Cup.
The Celtics have the best odds of +400 to win the trophy and the $500,000 prize per player.
Boston is at the top, and it’s not close. The nearest team behind them is the New York Knicks, with +950 odds. The Minnesota Timberwolves (+1000), Cleveland Cavaliers (+1000), and Denver Nuggets (+1100) round out the top five.
The Celtics are in East Group C, which features the Cavaliers, Chicago Bulls, Hawks, and Washington Wizards. The Celtics’ road to the cup is in their favor outside of the Cavaliers, who currently have the best record in the league at 12-0.
A combination of random drawing and records from last season determined the groups. Teams within each conference were put into one of five pots: one for the teams with the three best records in that conference last season, one for the next three best teams, and so on.
Last season, the Celtics came up short in the then-in-season Tournament, but with an even better team this season, the hope is that they can be the last team standing.
Boston has all the tools to raise the trophy and win the prize money. They rank fifth in points per game, fourth in average score margin, and eighth in fastbreak points. On the defensive side of the ball, they rank eighth in opponent points per game, right in opponent fastbreak points, and 10th in opponent effective field goal percentage.
The quest for their first cup kicks off on Tuesday. Group play games will be played on Tuesdays and Fridays from Tuesday until Dec. 6.
If the Celtics are lucky enough, they will play in the quarterfinal games on Dec. 10 and 11. The semifinals and championship will be in Las Vegas on Dec. 14 and Dec. 17.
Nothing should be standing in the way of the Celtics, as the only core player they are missing in their lineup now is their big man, Kristaps Porziņģis.
More Celtics: Celtics’ Joe Mazzulla Upset by ‘Ridiculous’ Non-Call on Hard Foul Against Jayson Tatum
Boston, MA
Boston election ballot mess raises concerns about city’s ability to handle ranked-choice voting
Boston’s failures in last week’s election have prompted concerns around whether its Election Department, now under investigation by the Secretary of State’s office, would be able to handle a “dramatic” shift to a ranked-choice voting system.
Opponents of a Council proposal that seeks to overhaul the city’s election process with a ranked-choice voting system, where voters would rank their favorite candidates, have seized onto last week’s ballot shortages as proof that Boston is not equipped to handle “sweeping changes” to its electoral system.
“Ranked-choice voting is deeply flawed and should be kept far from Boston,” MassGOP spokesman Logan Trupiano said. “Before even considering sweeping changes to our electoral process, Boston must first prove it can manage a basic election.
“Mayor Wu must be held accountable for this complete failure,” Trupiano added. “With the Secretary of State’s office right here in Boston, how could such a blunder happen? Despite 766,200 ballots printed and delivered, polling locations across the city ran out of ballots. It is absolutely unacceptable.”
Secretary of State William Galvin launched an investigation into the Boston Election Department and is considering receivership after a series of Election Day snafus left polling places in multiple neighborhoods short on ballots, reflecting what he described as “incompetence” on the part of city elections officials.
Galvin placed the Boston Election Department under receivership in 2006, after similar ballot shortages hampered that year’s November state election, in which former Gov. Deval Patrick was elected.
The Secretary of State’s office did not respond to a request for comment.
Mayor Michelle Wu last week initially blamed the ballot shortages on heavy turnout. Her office later pivoted to saying there was a “miscalculation in formulas to set ballot deliveries for precincts that would be processed ahead of Election Day.”
The city’s election failures came amid a City Council push, led by the body’s President Ruthzee Louijeune, for a switch to ranked-choice voting — a process Boston Election Department officials have already said would create operational challenges, additional costs, and prolong the amount of time it would take to count ballots on election night.
A spokesperson for Mayor Wu said in a statement the “City of Boston Elections Commission will always carry out their charge to administer free and fair elections under the laws that define election procedures in the Commonwealth.”
“We continue to work closely with the Secretary of State’s office and to conduct our internal review to identify needed improvements for the most efficient and effective ways to ensure full access to the ballot,” the Wu spokesperson said.
Gregory Maynard, a political consultant and executive director of Boston Policy Institute, said, however, that the city’s handling of last week’s election “doesn’t bode well for Boston’s version of ranked-choice voting.”
“One of the major advantages of Cambridge, Massachusetts’ version of ranked-choice voting is that it doesn’t require a preliminary election, so the city can focus on just the November Election Day,” Maynard said. “The plan Boston is pursuing still has a preliminary and adds all this complexity to the actual ballot counting in November.”
Paul Craney, executive director of the Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance, said “ranked-choice voting doesn’t deliver on its promises,” and “only elects a winner by eliminating ballots.”
“Even if Boston could hold its elections without controversy, ranked-choice voting is a bad idea,” Craney said.
Larry DiCara, an attorney and former city council president, called ranked-choice voting a “very interesting idea from very well-intentioned people who do not necessarily understand how complicated voting is for a lot of people, and how even more complicated it would be.”
“I think that it’s a great thing for highly intelligent people who can figure it out, and for people, who English is not their first language … I think it’s confusing,” DiCara said. “You’ve got to be careful when you’re running elections because people’s franchise is at stake, and the simpler we make it for people, the better.”
A request for comment from the council president, Louijeune, on whether last week’s election mishaps raised concerns about the Election Department’s ability to handle ranked-choice voting was not returned.
Louijeune put forward the proposal in June as a way to “modernize how we vote and how every vote is heard in our elections.” The Herald reported last month on a similar statewide ballot push that is underway. A prior ballot question was defeated by Massachusetts voters in a 2020 referendum.
Some of her colleagues, however, did not shy away from weighing in.
“After last week’s failure in leadership by the Boston Election Department, it’s obvious Boston is unable to move forward with a dramatic shift to ranked-choice voting,” City Councilor Ed Flynn said. “I’m against a change from the current system to a more complicated and confusing ranked-choice voting.
“We need to refocus our efforts on neighborhood services and the delivery of basic city services, including conducting an effective Election Day operation,” Flynn added. “We also need a dramatic change in leadership at the Election Department, including the implementation of a state receiver, to ensure this failure never takes place again.”
Councilor Erin Murphy, who last week co-wrote a letter to Galvin’s office with Flynn pushing for receivership and co-sponsored a Council hearing order on “voter accessibility and election preparedness” with Louijeune, raised similar doubts.
“We’re a long way from ranked-choice voting being implemented in Boston, and my immediate focus is ensuring that every voter who wants to participate in our elections can do so without barriers,” Murphy said. “Right now, my priority is to address critical issues within our current system before we even consider introducing a major shift like ranked-choice voting, which I don’t believe the Election Department is equipped to handle at this time.”
Boston, MA
Pink cocaine has reportedly made its way to the Boston area
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
-
Culture1 week ago
Yankees’ Gerrit Cole opts out of contract, per source: How New York could prevent him from testing free agency
-
Culture1 week ago
Try This Quiz on Books That Were Made Into Great Space Movies
-
Health5 days ago
Lose Weight Without the Gym? Try These Easy Lifestyle Hacks
-
Culture4 days ago
The NFL is heading to Germany – and the country has fallen for American football
-
Business3 days ago
Ref needs glasses? Not anymore. Lasik company offers free procedures for referees
-
Technology1 week ago
Amazon’s Echo Spot alarm clock is on sale with a free color smart bulb
-
Sports4 days ago
All-Free-Agent Team: Closers and corner outfielders aplenty, harder to fill up the middle
-
News1 day ago
Herbert Smith Freehills to merge with US-based law firm Kramer Levin