Sign up for the Today newsletter
Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.
Another storm comes in today bringing the snow, especially from late morning through this evening.
A coastal storm passing just offshore will bring a widespread, wet snowfall to much of southern New England.
Here’s what’s in the forecast:
Most of Southern New England is looking at 2–5 inch accumulations, with localized spots near 6 inches possible in southeastern Massachusetts and Rhode Island where the snow falls the steadiest and will have the most intensity.


Snow begins moving into Connecticut late morning, then spreads northeast into eastern Mass. after lunchtime.
It starts light, but the heaviest snow arrives late afternoon into the evening, when rates could reach ½ to 1 inch per hour, and even higher near the South Coast if temperatures cool just enough. Temperatures will be close to freezing, so this will be a heavy, wet snow, which can still accumulate even with readings hovering near or just above freezing.

Snow tapers off from west to east late tonight, generally between 10 p.m. and 2 a.m..
Expect slippery roads, reduced visibility during heavier bursts, and slushy travel near the coast. Travel could be hazardous.
A winter weather advisory is in effect from 7 a.m. today through 7 a.m. Monday for much of southern New England, plus parts of Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine.
Click here for active weather alerts

Looking ahead, colder air rushes in behind this system Monday night as an arctic front sweeps through. Tuesday into early Wednesday will be the coldest stretch, with well-below-normal temperatures and wind chills near or below zero at times. The cold eases a bit by Wednesday afternoon into Thursday, with quieter weather overall, but passing front could bring a brief chance for light snow or rain showers, mainly near the coast. Below normal temperatures may return later in the week.
President Trump holds up an executive order to limit mail-in voting as Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick looks on in the White House’s Oval Office in March.
Alex Wong/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Alex Wong/Getty Images
President Trump’s executive order to limit voting by mail has hit a legal hurdle.
On Thursday, a Boston-based judge blocked parts of the order that, at least so far, has not directly affected mail-in voting for this year’s midterm primary elections.
The legal fight, however, is likely to continue. The order pushes the boundaries of Trump’s authority under the Constitution, which gives state legislatures and Congress — not the U.S. president — the power to set the rules for federal elections.
The Trump administration is expected to appeal the new ruling by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, a nominee of former President Barack Obama, as a separate appeal of an earlier ruling by another federal judge moves forward in a similar set of lawsuits based in Washington, D.C.

Among other directives, Trump’s order from March calls for the Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Postal Service to create lists of adult U.S. citizens or eligible voters in each state. It also calls for USPS, which is independent of a president’s administration, to deliver mail-in ballots only to people on those lists.
In response, USPS has proposed using information from state election officials to create voter lists. Postmaster General David Steiner told lawmakers Wednesday that under the proposal, the Postal Service would not deliver the mail ballots of any states that refuse to turn over their absentee voter lists to the federal government.
For the D.C.-based cases, the judge found in late May that it was too early for an emergency ruling that would block directives that the Trump administration has yet to carry out. Democrats are appealing that judge’s ruling to the U.S. Appeals Court for the District of Columbia.
Editor’s note: USPS is a financial supporter of NPR.
Edited by Benjamin Swasey
Local News
A 13-year-old boy was flown to a Boston hospital after he was found unresponsive in a swimming pool at a home in Beverly on Wednesday afternoon, police said.
Police and firefighters were called to a home on Parramatta Road after bystanders pulled the boy from the pool, the Beverly Police Department wrote in a press release.
Bystanders administered CPR until first responders arrived, according to police. First responders continued CPR and other “life saving measures,” police said.
An ambulance took the boy to Beverly Hospital where he was stabilized. He was then taken by medical helicopter to a Boston hospital, police said.
The incident is currently being investigated by Beverly police, the department said.
Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.
Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.
A federal judge on Wednesday permanently barred President Donald Trump’s administration from implementing most of his first executive order on elections, part of which sought to require people to show documentary proof of citizenship when they register to vote.
The ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Denise Casper in Boston effectively converts a preliminary injunction she issued a year ago, in which she temporarily blocked many of Trump’s efforts to overhaul elections, into a permanent ban.
Casper rejected the administration’s argument that the lawsuit to block the changes brought by Democratic state attorneys general was premature because the rules had yet to be implemented. Instead, she agreed that the Constitution gives states and Congress the authority to regulate elections, and that Trump’s requirements violated the separation of powers.
The Constitution “does not grant the President any specific powers over elections,” she wrote.
Among other proposed changes, Trump’s order would have required people to provide documentary proof of citizenship when registering to vote, prevented mail ballots from being counted if they arrive after Election Day, even if they were postmarked by then, and punished states that failed to comply by withholding certain federal money.
It was the latest in a string of rulings against the elections executive order Trump signed just months after taking office for his second term. He has since signed another executive order on elections, seeking to create a national voter list and limit mail balloting. That directive also faces multiple legal challenges.
Last fall, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., overseeing a separate challenge to the first election executive order by civil rights and Democratic Party-aligned groups blocked the government from taking steps to include the proof-of-citizenship requirement on the federal voter registration form. That judge later barred the Secretary of Defense from requiring documentary proof of citizenship when military personnel register to vote or request ballots.
In an apparent nod to the difficulty of implementing a proof-of-citizen requirement by executive order, Trump is pushing legislation in the Republican-controlled Congress to create such a mandate. The SAVE America Act has passed the House but has stalled in the Senate, leading Trump to advocate for eliminating the filibuster that is blocking the legislation.
On Wednesday, he abruptly cancelled the expected signing of a bipartisan housing bill, saying he won’t sign legislation until Congress passes his proof of citizenship requirement for voting.
Person hospitalized after shed fire in Harpswell
Navy ship USS Marinette arrives in Maryland for Sail250:
Michigan president has strong words for college sports after Dusty May exit
Mass. lawmakers prioritizing 100 high-risk locations to implement wrong-way driving prevention measures – Boston News, Weather, Sports | WHDH 7News
Rationalizing Charlotte’s Shocking Decision to Trade LaMelo Ball to Minnesota
Mississippi Legislature will talk school choice, redistricting in 2027
Missouri Highway Patrol investigating KCPD officer involved shooting
Montana DEQ works toward impairment designation for Big Hole River