Connect with us

News

Why Stacey Abrams Isn’t Embracing Her Democratic Stardom (So Far)

Published

on

Why Stacey Abrams Isn’t Embracing Her Democratic Stardom (So Far)

CUTHBERT, Ga. — As Stacey Abrams started her second marketing campaign for Georgia governor with a speech this week about Medicaid growth in entrance of a shuttered rural hospital, the gang of about 50 peppered her with questions on points like paving new roads.

However Sandra Willis, the mayor professional tem of this city of roughly 3,500 individuals, had a broader level to make. “When you get elected, you gained’t neglect us, will you?” she requested.

The query mirrored Ms. Abrams’s standing as a nationwide Democratic celeb, who was extensively credited with serving to to ship Georgia for her social gathering within the 2020 elections and has made her identify synonymous with the battle for voting rights.

However she has proven little want to place poll entry on the heart of her bid. Her first days on the marketing campaign path have been spent largely in small, rural cities like Cuthbert, the place she is extra excited about discussing Medicaid growth and assist to small companies than the flagship problem that helped catapult her to nationwide fame.

Ms. Abrams’s technique quantities to a significant guess that her marketing campaign can survive a bleak election 12 months for Democrats by capitalizing on Georgia’s fast-changing demographics and successful over on-the-fence voters who need their governor to largely keep above the fray of nationwide political battles.

Advertisement

“I’m a Georgian first,” she stated in an interview. “And my job is to spend particularly these first few months anchoring the dialog about Georgia.”

In Cuthbert, the place Ms. Abrams was pressed on Monday by Ms. Willis on her dedication to Georgia’s small communities, she reminded onlookers that this was not her first go to to city — and she or he promised it could not be her final. The city sits in Randolph County, considered one of a handful of rural, predominantly Black counties that had been essential to Democrats’ victories in Georgia within the final cycle. Upward of 96 % of Black voters who solid ballots right here within the 2020 presidential election voted within the 2021 Senate runoff elections.

Randolph has additionally been held up for instance of the state’s neglect of its low-income, rural residents: The county’s solely hospital shut down in October 2020.

“I’m right here to assist,” Ms. Abrams stated in her Monday speech in entrance of the closed hospital. Itemizing the names of seven counties surrounding Randolph, she promised to be a “governor for all of Georgia, particularly southwest Georgia.”

Ms. Abrams’s give attention to state and hyperlocal points displays an understanding that to win Georgia, any Democrat should seize votes in all corners of the state. That additionally means figuring out the problems closest to voters in each nook.

Advertisement

“The whole lot both occurs in Atlanta, or outdoors of Atlanta within the suburbs,” stated Bobby Jenkins, the mayor of Cuthbert and a Democrat. “However because the election in November confirmed, you’ve received quite a lot of Democrats, lots of people in these rural areas, and you can not overlook them. There aren’t many on this county. However while you band all of those counties collectively in southwest Georgia, then you possibly can create some impression.”

Ms. Abrams has additionally used visits just like the one to Cuthbert and a later meet-and-greet within the central Georgia city of Warner Robins to criticize Gov. Brian Kemp, a Republican who beat her in the identical race in 2018, over what she known as his weakening of the state’s public well being infrastructure throughout the pandemic and his underinvestment in rural communities.

“If we should not have a governor who sees and focuses on how Georgia can mitigate these harms, how Georgia can bolster alternative, then the nationwide surroundings is much less related, as a result of the deepest ache comes from nearer to house,” Ms. Abrams stated within the interview.

Nonetheless, that nationwide surroundings stays unfriendly to Democrats. Lower than eight months earlier than the November midterm elections, the social gathering is staring down a document variety of Home retirements, a failure to cross the majority of President Biden’s agenda and a pessimistic citizens that’s driving his low approval scores.

But Democrats see causes for hope in Georgia. The state continues to develop youthful and extra racially numerous, in a boon to the community of organizations that helped prove the voters who flipped Georgia blue in 2020. Lots of these teams stay well-staffed and well-funded. And whereas Ms. Abrams is working unopposed within the Democratic main, Mr. Kemp faces 4 challengers, together with a Trump-backed candidate, former Senator David Perdue.

Advertisement

All of for this reason, whereas Ms. Abrams’s public picture has expanded, she has not deviated a lot from the marketing campaign technique she employed in 2018. Throughout her first run for governor, she visited all 159 of Georgia’s counties and aimed for surges in turnout in deep-blue metro Atlanta counties at the same time as she sought to prove new voters in rural areas that Democrats had traditionally ceded to Republicans. A number of of her 2022 marketing campaign workers members shaped her 2018 mind belief.

Voting rights activists within the state — lots of whom say their relationship with Ms. Abrams and her marketing campaign stays heat — hesitate to query Ms. Abrams’s diminished give attention to poll entry, particularly since it’s so early within the marketing campaign and her technique may but shift.

“She has a sure star, nationwide highlight high quality that you simply not often see with Southern candidates,” stated LaTosha Brown, a co-founder of the group Black Voters Matter in Georgia. She expressed confidence that Ms. Abrams’s candidacy would “proceed to maintain the voting rights problem from dying.”

Ms. Abrams’s organizing for voting rights has its roots in her years because the minority chief within the Georgia Statehouse. She based the voter enfranchisement group New Georgia Mission in 2013 to prove extra younger and rare voters — a method she pitched to nationwide Democrats forward of the 2020 election amid efforts to steer white average voters.

Then, a 12 months in the past, after Georgia’s Republican-led legislature handed a sweeping invoice of voting restrictions, poll entry once more turned a central problem for nationwide Democrats. Amid the social gathering’s uproar concerning the invoice and others prefer it, Ms. Abrams targeted on the coverage implications of the laws over the political. Throughout testimony to Republican senators in Washington shortly after the regulation’s passage, she laid out a laundry checklist of criticisms of the measure, denouncing its limits on drop packing containers and a discount in election precincts that would deter working individuals from voting.

Advertisement

For his or her half, Republicans are desirous to painting Ms. Abrams as an influential nationwide determine — however a harmful, radical one, whom they are going to attempt to beat in any respect prices.

Her critics on the correct have additionally aimed to color her as a sore loser, citing her yearslong insistence that Mr. Kemp’s 2018 victory over her owed to voter suppression ways that he employed because the Georgia secretary of state. Some have even in contrast her to former President Donald J. Trump in her unwillingness to just accept unfavorable election outcomes.

“Stacey Abrams spent the final 4 years chasing style-magazine covers, championing the nationwide Democrats’ harmful far-left agenda, and waging shadow campaigns for president and vice chairman,” stated Tate Mitchell, a spokesman for Mr. Kemp. “For her, this marketing campaign for governor is about attaining extra money and energy — not placing hardworking Georgians first.”

However she has been cautious to counter that narrative, making clear in her latest marketing campaign speeches that she didn’t win in 2018.

“4 years in the past, after I utilized for this job of governor, I had my software declined,” she instructed supporters in Atlanta on Monday. “That’s OK. I’ve had 4 years to work on issues. I’ve had 4 years to dwell as much as what I instructed of us I might do after I was working for workplace.”

Advertisement

Throughout her speech in Atlanta, Ms. Abrams talked about voting rights solely briefly, alluding to the state’s new voting regulation as she warned of a Republican backlash to Democrats’ inroads in Georgia in latest election cycles.

Within the interview, she stated that in 2018, she had underestimated the extent of limits on entry to the poll.

“I used to be conscious of the final structure,” Ms. Abrams stated. “I used to be not conscious of simply how deeply embedded it had grow to be within the conduct of our elections. And that isn’t one thing that may shock me once more.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

RFK Jr. Would ‘Significantly Undermine’ Public Health, a Group of Experts Says

Published

on

RFK Jr. Would ‘Significantly Undermine’ Public Health, a Group of Experts Says

A new national coalition of health professionals and scientists, mobilizing to oppose Senate confirmation of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to be the United States’ next health secretary, released a public letter on Monday warning that his “unfounded, fringe beliefs could significantly undermine public health practices across the country and around the world.”

The coalition, calling itself “Defend Public Health,” includes faculty members from some of the U.S.’s leading academic institutions, including public health schools at Yale and Havard. Its leaders said they had gathered 700 signatures on the public letter and had generated 3,500 individual letters urging senators to reject Mr. Kennedy, President-elect Donald J. Trump’s choice to lead the Department of Health and Human Services.

“Mr. Kennedy is unqualified to lead the nation’s health department with a budget of over $1.6 trillion and over 80,000 employees,” the public letter states. “He has little to no relevant administrative, policy or health experience or expertise that would prepare him to oversee the work of critical public health agencies.”

Over the past several weeks, Mr. Kennedy has made the rounds on Capitol Hill, paying courtesy calls to senators who will consider his nomination. His confirmation is not assured, with some Republicans, including Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, chairman of the Senate Health Committee, having said that Mr. Kennedy’s vaccine skepticism gives them pause.

The letter published on Monday is only the latest public push by Kennedy opponents. A separate group, the Committee to Protect Health Care, said last week that it had gathered more than 15,000 signatures on a letter opposing Mr. Kennedy.

Advertisement

But Kennedy allies in the medical field are also mobilizing. In December, not long after Mr. Trump announced his nomination, a group of 800 medical professionals released its own letter supporting Mr. Kennedy. It said his nomination “represents an unparalleled chance to restore our nation’s health and renew trust in our public health institutions.”

Continue Reading

News

Trump risks turning the US into a rogue state

Published

on

Trump risks turning the US into a rogue state

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

“I think the president-elect is having a bit of fun”. That was how the Canadian ambassador to Washington reacted to Donald Trump’s first suggestion that her country should become the 51st American state.

The menacing “joke” is one of Trump’s preferred methods of communication. But the incoming president has now spoken at such length about his ambition to incorporate Canada into the US that Canadian politicians are having to take his ambitions seriously, and reject them in public.

The Canadians have the small solace that Trump ruled out invading their country and is instead threatening them with “economic force”. But he has refused to rule out military action to achieve his ambitions to “take back” the Panama Canal and take over Greenland, which is a self-governing Danish territory.

Advertisement

More light-hearted banter? The chancellor of Germany and foreign minister of France took Trump’s threats seriously enough to warn that Greenland is covered by the EU’s mutual defence clause. In other words — at least in theory — the EU and the US could end up at war over Greenland.

Trump’s defenders and sycophants are treating the whole thing as a huge joke. The New York Post proclaimed a new “Donroe Doctrine” — the 19th-century message to Europeans not to meddle in the western hemisphere — with Greenland relabelled as “our land”. Brandon Gill, a Republican congressman, smirked that the Canadians, Panamanians and Greenlanders should be “honoured” at the idea of becoming Americans.

But the rights of small nations are not a joke. The forcible or coerced takeover of a country by a larger neighbour is the biggest alarm bell in world politics. It is a signal that a rogue state is on the march. That is why the western alliance knew it was crucial to support Ukraine’s resistance to Russia. It is also why the US organised an international alliance to eject Iraq from Kuwait in the early nineties.

Attacks on small countries triggered the first and second world wars. When the British cabinet agonised in 1914 over whether go to war with Germany, David Lloyd George, who later became prime minister, wrote to his wife: “I have fought hard for peace . . . but I am driven to the conclusion that if the small nationality of Belgium is attacked by Germany all my traditions . . . will be engaged on the side of war.”

Britain and France infamously refused to protect Czechoslovakia from Nazi Germany in 1938. But within a year, they had recognised their error and extended a security guarantee to Poland — the next small neighbour on Germany’s hit list. The invasion of Poland triggered the start of conflict.

Advertisement

Trump’s supporters bitterly resent any comparison between his rhetoric and that of aggressors from the past or present. They argue that his demands are actually aimed at strengthening the free world, for a struggle against an autocratic China and possibly Russia too. Trump has justified his expansionist ambitions for Canada, Greenland and Panama on grounds of national security.

Another argument is that Trump’s bluster is simply a negotiating tactic. His supporters sometimes claim that he is just putting pressure on allied nations to do what is necessary, for the greater good of the western alliance. And after all, they say, aren’t many of Greenland’s 55,000 inhabitants seeking independence from Denmark? Are Canadians not tiring of the incompetent “woke” elite who run their country?

But these are feeble arguments. It would be legitimate for Trump to try to persuade Greenlanders that they might be better off as Americans. But threatening to use military or economic coercion is outrageous. His claims that many Canadians would love to join the US are also delusional. The idea was rejected by 82 per cent of Canadians in a recent poll.

As for grand strategy — the reality is that Trump’s threats to Greenland, Panama and Canada are an absolute gift to Russia and China. If Trump can claim that it is a strategic necessity for the US to take over Greenland or the Panama Canal, why is it illegitimate for Putin to claim that it is a strategic necessity for Russia to control Ukraine? If Gill can claim it is America’s “manifest destiny” to expand its frontiers, who could object when Xi Jinping insists it is China’s manifest destiny to control Taiwan?

Both Russia and China have long dreamt of pulling apart the western alliance. Trump is doing their work for them. Just a few weeks ago, it would have been beyond the Kremlin’s wildest dreams to see Canada’s main news magazine running a cover story on “Why America can’t conquer Canada”. The idea of European leaders invoking the EU’s mutual-defence clause against the US — not Russia — would also have seemed like fantasy. But these are the new realities.

Advertisement

Even if Trump never makes good on his threats, he has already done enormous damage to America’s global standing and to its alliance system. And he is not even in office yet.

It does seem unlikely Trump would order an invasion of Greenland. (Although it once seemed unlikely that he would attempt to overthrow an election.) It is even less probable that Canada will be intimidated into surrendering its independence. But the very fact that the incoming president is ripping up international norms is a disaster. Any sniggering at Trump’s “jokes” is misplaced. What we are witnessing is a tragedy — not a comedy.

gideon.rachman@ft.com

Continue Reading

News

Firefighters Brace For More Santa Ana Winds As Los Angeles Palisades and Eaton Fires Continue To Burn | Weather.com

Published

on

Firefighters Brace For More Santa Ana Winds As Los Angeles Palisades and Eaton Fires Continue To Burn | Weather.com
undefined

Play

  • At least 24 have been killed in wildfires throughout Los Angeles County.
  • Red flag warnings are issued for early this week, meaning dangerous fire conditions are expected.
  • The fires combined have burned more than 62 square miles.

T​he death toll is up to 24 as wildfires continue to burn in Los Angeles County. The Palisades Fire is being blamed for eight of those deaths, while the Eaton Fire is responsible for 16 fatalities. According to the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s office, missing persons reports have been filed for 16 individuals. The number of missing and the number perished could both rise, according to officials.

F​irefighters who spent the weekend keeping four large fires in check are now bracing for more Santa Ana winds which could stoke the flames and cause new fires to flare up.

The National Weather Service has posted red flag warnings through Wednesday, meaning severe fire conditions are expected. Gusts from 45 mph up to 70 mph are expected, with the worst of the weather coming on Tuesday morning through noon Wednesday.

(​MORE: Intense ‘Firenado’ Spawned By Palisades Fire)

Homes along the Pacific Coast Highway are seen burned by the Palisades Fire, Sunday, Jan. 12, 2025, in Malibu, California.

(AP Photo/Mark J. Terrill)

Seventy additional water trucks were sent to the county to help with any surging flames in the coming days, and fire retardant dropped from the air will block fires along hillsides, officials said.

“We are prepared for the upcoming wind event,” Los Angeles County Fire Chief Anthony C. Marrone said, according to the AP.

Advertisement

About 150,000 people in Los Angeles County are under evacuation orders. Officials said that evacuation orders in the Palisades area will likely stay in place until the red flag warnings expire Wednesday evening.

In total, the four blazes have consumed more than 62 square miles, an area larger than San Francisco, The Associated Press reported. T​he Palisades Fire, which has burned more than 37 square miles, according to CalFire, has consumed more than 1,000 structures. The fire was 13% contained early Monday morning. The Eaton Fire, at 27% containment early Monday, had consumed more than 22 square miles and more than 1,400 structures.

T​he Hurst Fire is now 89% contained after burning a little over one square mile.

More than 14,000 personnel, including firefighters from California, nine other states and Mexico, have been responding to the fires.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending