Connect with us

News

What’s Next for D.E.I. With Trump Back in Office?

Published

on

What’s Next for D.E.I. With Trump Back in Office?

President Trump had barely reacquainted himself with the Oval Office after his second inauguration when he began shredding the D.E.I. initiatives of the Biden administration, fulfilling a cause célèbre for conservatives that had helped power his political comeback.

On his second day back in power, Mr. Trump ordered that agency heads place those officials who had been responsible for overseeing diversity, equity and inclusion programs in the federal government on paid administrative leave and that their offices be shuttered.

Part of an executive action signed one day earlier, it was the first step in rolling back the D.E.I. policies that had been a hallmark of the administration of his Democratic predecessor, President Joseph R. Biden Jr.

This is how we got here:

D.E.I. stands for diversity, equity and inclusion. A page on the U.S. Department of Labor website, which was removed two days into the president’s new term, defined diversity as acknowledging all the ways that people differ. That can include race, sex, gender, age, sexual orientation, disability, socioeconomic status, religious beliefs and more.

Advertisement

“Organizations that respect diversity can come up with new ideas, solve problems, grow and run more efficiently,” the deleted entry on D.E.I. read on the agency’s website, which later read, “Page not found.”

While the three-letter abbreviation has become a hot topic in recent years, the principle has been around for decades in both the public and the private sectors. It developed as a result of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibited employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin.

Beyond the federal government, private companies, universities and nonprofit groups have put D.E.I. principles into practice.

The 2020 murder of George Floyd, an unarmed Black man who was killed by police officers in Minneapolis, ushered in a national reckoning over racial discrimination that brought sweeping changes to many powerful institutions and a renewed emphasis on D.E.I. initiatives, including actions by the Biden administration. (Mr. Biden unveiled a “racial equity agenda” on his first day in office in January 2021.)

A nonprofit made up of several of the largest U.S. companies asked its members to pledge to hire and promote Black workers based on skills instead of college degrees. An increasing number of brands such as Chick-fil-A, Bud Light and Target — through policies and advertising campaigns — adopted a mantra of being more inclusive.

Advertisement

Having lost the presidency in 2020 to Democrats, who also controlled the House and Senate when Mr. Biden entered office, Republicans latched onto an emerging wedge issue, one that became a flashpoint in the 2024 election: D.E.I.

Those three letters became a staple of Mr. Trump’s campaign speeches, guaranteed to draw jeers from arenas full of his supporters in battleground states as he argued that the federal government and many companies had become “woke.” A 2023 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court further emboldened conservatives by rejecting affirmative action at colleges and universities.

And when Mr. Biden was replaced as the Democratic presidential nominee in July by Vice President Kamala Harris, some of Mr. Trump’s allies in Congress disparagingly referred to her as a “D.E.I. hire.” In front of an audience of Black journalists in Chicago, Mr. Trump refused to disavow his supporters’ remarks and questioned Ms. Harris’s racial identity as a Black woman.

“She was Indian all the way, and then all of a sudden she made a turn and she became a Black person,” he said of Ms. Harris, whose mother was Indian American, whose father is Black and who has always embraced both her Black and South Asian identity.

One day after Mr. Trump declared in his inaugural address that he would “end the government policy of trying to socially engineer race and gender into every aspect of public and private life,” his administration began purging D.E.I. staff members from federal agencies.

Advertisement

Those agencies were ordered to take down any language or advertisements about their D.E.I. initiatives and to withdraw any pending documents or directives that would undermine the new orders. The Trump administration threatened federal employees with “adverse consequences” if they failed to report on colleagues who had defied orders to eradicate D.E.I. efforts from their agencies.

Mr. Trump urged the private sector to take similar steps and directed agencies to investigate compliance by corporations and foundations. Companies working as contractors or subcontractors for the federal government could also find themselves bound by the new rules.

After Mr. Trump’s victory in the 2024 election, several prominent companies started rolling back their D.E.I. initiatives. Among them were Walmart, McDonald’s, Amazon and Meta.

Still, some corporations have forged ahead with their racial and gender equity programs, including Costco and Microsoft.

Erica L. Green, Zolan Kanno-Youngs, Nell Gallogly, Steve Lohr, Mike Isaac, Sheera Frenkel, Kate Conger and Jordyn Holman contributed reporting.

Advertisement

News

US Colleges received more than $5 billion in foreign gifts, contracts in 2025

Published

on

US Colleges received more than  billion in foreign gifts, contracts in 2025

The top 10 countries that gave contracts and gifts to U.S. colleges and universities as of December 16, 2025.

Screenshot by NPR/The U.S. Department of Education


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Screenshot by NPR/The U.S. Department of Education

U.S. colleges received more than 5 billion dollars in reportable foreign gifts and contracts in 2025, according to a new website from the U.S. Education Department. The release is part of a push by the Trump administration to make foreign influence in colleges and universities more transparent.

Among the biggest recipients, the data show, are Carnegie Mellon University, Harvard University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Stanford University.

Qatar was the largest foreign source of funds to schools, making up more than 20% — or about 1.1 billion. Other sources include the United Kingdom, China, Switzerland and Japan.

Advertisement

In a statement, Education Secretary Linda McMahon said the data provide “unprecedented visibility into funding” from countries that threaten “America’s national security.”

Under existing federal law, institutions are required to report gifts or contracts from foreign entities above $250,000. But Republicans have long raised underreporting as an issue of national security — pushing for more reporting and more transparency.

Since the start of President Trump’s second term, the administration has investigated Harvard University and the University of California, Berkeley, for allegedly underreporting their foreign gifts.

Ian Oxnevad, a senior fellow at the National Association of Scholars, a conservative advocacy organization, called the release of the new information a “step in the right direction.”

He said the data brings welcome transparency to the sometimes murky world of foreign gifts to U.S. colleges. This data sheds light on “specific countries, what universities they donate to, and the amounts.

Advertisement

Among the significant revelations, he noted, are that “Qatar and China are among the top countries that donate to our universities, and not our allies or neighbors.”

The new website includes data on what McMahon called “countries of concern,” including China, Russia and Iran. Harvard, New York University and MIT top the list of schools getting money from those countries.

It’s important, Oxnevad said, given the role that universities such as Harvard and other Ivy League schools play in shaping public policy, to be aware that they’re “getting such heavy foreign funds.”

Universities have said they are in compliance with the law.

“MIT research on campus, regardless of funding source, is open and publishable,” the university said in a statement. “We follow all federal laws in accepting and reporting any such gifts or contracts.”

Advertisement

The American Council on Education, a member organization that represents and advocates for colleges and universities, echoed that sentiment.

“This demonstrates that our institutions are doing a good job reporting this information,” says Sarah Spreitzer, vice president and chief of staff at ACE.

Both Spreitzer and Oxnevad pointed out limitations in the data on the website, including a lack of details or an ability to compare years and see trends over time. Both were critical of the government’s tracking and reporting of this information under past administrations.

But Spreitzer added that some of the information, without more context or detail, is misleading, or at best dated.

“I worry that [the administration] is trying to send a message to taxpayers that our institutions are taking a lot of money from foreign donors,” says Spreitzer. “We are all for more transparency.”

Advertisement

Her concern though, she said, is how the Trump administration will use this data in its continuing attacks on higher education.

Continue Reading

News

Video: F.A.A. Said to Have Closed El Paso Airspace Over Military’s Use of Anti-Drone Technology

Published

on

Video: F.A.A. Said to Have Closed El Paso Airspace Over Military’s Use of Anti-Drone Technology

new video loaded: F.A.A. Said to Have Closed El Paso Airspace Over Military’s Use of Anti-Drone Technology

transcript

transcript

F.A.A. Said to Have Closed El Paso Airspace Over Military’s Use of Anti-Drone Technology

The Federal Aviation Administration lifted an order to ground all flights at El Paso International Airport on Wednesday. The order was initially issued on Tuesday night. The Trump administration claimed a drone incursion caused the El Paso airspace closure. But people briefed on the situation said it was because of the military’s use of anti-drone technology.

“You cannot restrict airspace over a major city without coordinating with the city, the airport, the hospitals, the community leadership. That failure to communicate is unacceptable.” “The information coming from the administration does not add up, and it’s not the information that I was able to gather overnight and this morning. There was not a threat, and — which is why the F.A.A. lifted this restriction so quickly.”

Advertisement
The Federal Aviation Administration lifted an order to ground all flights at El Paso International Airport on Wednesday. The order was initially issued on Tuesday night. The Trump administration claimed a drone incursion caused the El Paso airspace closure. But people briefed on the situation said it was because of the military’s use of anti-drone technology.

By Jorge Mitssunaga

February 11, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Trump-Netanyahu meeting ends with no agreement on Iran strategy

Published

on

Trump-Netanyahu meeting ends with no agreement on Iran strategy

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Donald Trump said he “insisted” US talks with Iran should continue in a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday that concluded with no agreement on the strategy towards Tehran.

In a Truth Social post on Wednesday afternoon, Trump said he told the Israeli leader that his “preference” was to reach a pact with Iran on its nuclear programme even as Washington continues to weigh new military strikes against the Islamic republic.

Trump wrote: “There was nothing definitive reached other than I insisted that negotiations with Iran continue to see whether or not a Deal can be consummated. If it can, I let the Prime Minister know that will be a preference. If it cannot, we will just have to see what the outcome will be.”

Advertisement

After the meeting, Netanyahu’s office issued a brief statement on X, saying the two men had spoken about the “negotiations with Iran, Gaza and regional developments”. It added the prime minister had “emphasised the security needs of the state of Israel in the context of the negotiations and the two leaders agreed on continued co-ordination and the close contact between them”.

Ahead of the meeting with Netanyahu, Trump told Axios news on Tuesday that he was “thinking” about deploying a second aircraft carrier to the Middle East. This would be in addition to the Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group, which was sent to the region last month as part of a build-up of the American military presence in the Middle East in preparation for a potential strike on Iran.

When Washington attacked three main Iranian nuclear facilities last June, the US had two aircraft-carrier strike groups positioned in the region.

The US currently has 10 ships in the region, including the Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier — with dozens of fighter aircraft and thousands of troops on board — in the Arabian Sea. The Pentagon has also deployed two destroyers to the Mediterranean as well as sending more fighter jets and bolstering air defences in the Middle East.

Trump is widely expected to order the USS George HW Bush aircraft carrier to join the Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group in the Middle East. The George HW Bush is off the coast of Florida undergoing training exercises, according to the US Navy.

Advertisement

The Wall Street Journal on Wednesday reported the Pentagon has told an aircraft carrier strike group to prepare to deploy to the Middle East and that a deployment order could come within hours.

The navy said it could not speak to future operations and the Pentagon said it had no information. The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

Two incidents occurred last week between the US and Iran in Middle Eastern waters. American forces shot down an Iranian drone as it approached the Abraham Lincoln. Separately, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps threatened to board and seize a US-flagged tanker in the Strait of Hormuz, prompting an American warship to respond.

Additional reporting by Neri Zilber in Tel Aviv

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending