Connect with us

News

What’s Next for D.E.I. With Trump Back in Office?

Published

on

What’s Next for D.E.I. With Trump Back in Office?

President Trump had barely reacquainted himself with the Oval Office after his second inauguration when he began shredding the D.E.I. initiatives of the Biden administration, fulfilling a cause célèbre for conservatives that had helped power his political comeback.

On his second day back in power, Mr. Trump ordered that agency heads place those officials who had been responsible for overseeing diversity, equity and inclusion programs in the federal government on paid administrative leave and that their offices be shuttered.

Part of an executive action signed one day earlier, it was the first step in rolling back the D.E.I. policies that had been a hallmark of the administration of his Democratic predecessor, President Joseph R. Biden Jr.

This is how we got here:

D.E.I. stands for diversity, equity and inclusion. A page on the U.S. Department of Labor website, which was removed two days into the president’s new term, defined diversity as acknowledging all the ways that people differ. That can include race, sex, gender, age, sexual orientation, disability, socioeconomic status, religious beliefs and more.

Advertisement

“Organizations that respect diversity can come up with new ideas, solve problems, grow and run more efficiently,” the deleted entry on D.E.I. read on the agency’s website, which later read, “Page not found.”

While the three-letter abbreviation has become a hot topic in recent years, the principle has been around for decades in both the public and the private sectors. It developed as a result of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibited employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin.

Beyond the federal government, private companies, universities and nonprofit groups have put D.E.I. principles into practice.

The 2020 murder of George Floyd, an unarmed Black man who was killed by police officers in Minneapolis, ushered in a national reckoning over racial discrimination that brought sweeping changes to many powerful institutions and a renewed emphasis on D.E.I. initiatives, including actions by the Biden administration. (Mr. Biden unveiled a “racial equity agenda” on his first day in office in January 2021.)

A nonprofit made up of several of the largest U.S. companies asked its members to pledge to hire and promote Black workers based on skills instead of college degrees. An increasing number of brands such as Chick-fil-A, Bud Light and Target — through policies and advertising campaigns — adopted a mantra of being more inclusive.

Advertisement

Having lost the presidency in 2020 to Democrats, who also controlled the House and Senate when Mr. Biden entered office, Republicans latched onto an emerging wedge issue, one that became a flashpoint in the 2024 election: D.E.I.

Those three letters became a staple of Mr. Trump’s campaign speeches, guaranteed to draw jeers from arenas full of his supporters in battleground states as he argued that the federal government and many companies had become “woke.” A 2023 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court further emboldened conservatives by rejecting affirmative action at colleges and universities.

And when Mr. Biden was replaced as the Democratic presidential nominee in July by Vice President Kamala Harris, some of Mr. Trump’s allies in Congress disparagingly referred to her as a “D.E.I. hire.” In front of an audience of Black journalists in Chicago, Mr. Trump refused to disavow his supporters’ remarks and questioned Ms. Harris’s racial identity as a Black woman.

“She was Indian all the way, and then all of a sudden she made a turn and she became a Black person,” he said of Ms. Harris, whose mother was Indian American, whose father is Black and who has always embraced both her Black and South Asian identity.

One day after Mr. Trump declared in his inaugural address that he would “end the government policy of trying to socially engineer race and gender into every aspect of public and private life,” his administration began purging D.E.I. staff members from federal agencies.

Advertisement

Those agencies were ordered to take down any language or advertisements about their D.E.I. initiatives and to withdraw any pending documents or directives that would undermine the new orders. The Trump administration threatened federal employees with “adverse consequences” if they failed to report on colleagues who had defied orders to eradicate D.E.I. efforts from their agencies.

Mr. Trump urged the private sector to take similar steps and directed agencies to investigate compliance by corporations and foundations. Companies working as contractors or subcontractors for the federal government could also find themselves bound by the new rules.

After Mr. Trump’s victory in the 2024 election, several prominent companies started rolling back their D.E.I. initiatives. Among them were Walmart, McDonald’s, Amazon and Meta.

Still, some corporations have forged ahead with their racial and gender equity programs, including Costco and Microsoft.

Erica L. Green, Zolan Kanno-Youngs, Nell Gallogly, Steve Lohr, Mike Isaac, Sheera Frenkel, Kate Conger and Jordyn Holman contributed reporting.

Advertisement

News

Former Olympian pleads not guilty in reflecting pool vandalism charges

Published

on

Former Olympian pleads not guilty in reflecting pool vandalism charges

Former U.S. Olympian David Hearn (left) walks with his attorney Norman Eisen to speak to reporters and protesters gathered after his arraignment at the Superior Court of the District of Columbia in Washington, D.C. on Thursday.

Finn Gomez/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Finn Gomez/Getty Images

Former U.S. Olympic canoeist David Hearn pleaded not guilty to damaging the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in D.C. Superior Court Thursday morning.

Federal prosecutors charged Hearn with a single count of destruction of property causing more than $1,000 in damage to the pool.

Hearn has previously claimed, which his attorneys repeated during a short press conference outside the court, that he simply touched the water in the pool out of curiosity.

Advertisement

The Trump administration had just completed a $14 million renovation of the pool.

But shortly after the work finished, peeling paint and algae gathered in the water. The remodel has been largely criticized as a massive failure and waste of taxpayer dollars.

Superior Court Judge Carmen McLean released Hearn on his own recognizance. His next hearing is scheduled for Aug. 5.

Norm Eisen, one of Hearn’s attorneys, spoke to reporters outside of court following the hearing. He said the administration is using Hearn as a “scapegoat … for their own failures.”

“It is not a crime to touch the reflecting pool, to touch water in the United States of America,” he said.

Advertisement

Prosecutors say there is a host of evidence against Hearn.

This is a developing story.

Continue Reading

News

Three more people charged with damaging Reflecting Pool after Trump’s multimillion-dollar restoration | CNN Politics

Published

on

Three more people charged with damaging Reflecting Pool after Trump’s multimillion-dollar restoration | CNN Politics

Three more people have been criminally charged with destruction of property at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool.

Officers say they detained Cameron Thiers, Sophie Dennison-Gibby and Justin Carreno one Saturday afternoon in June and described in court documents witnessing them peeling and removing pieces of blue paint from the Reflecting Pool.

One officer “witnessed Carreno reach down into the reflecting pool and pull up a piece of the blue paint,” according to the court documents.

The officer who detained Dennison-Gibby “found 1 additional piece of the reflecting pool liner” in her purse, the documents said.

All three incidents were recorded on the officers’ body worn cameras, they said in the court documents.

Advertisement

Several “partnering law enforcement agencies assigned to the Reflecting Pool” working with US Park Police were involved in detaining the two men and one woman — including officers from Texas, Oklahoma, Montana and California.

One of the officers said in court documents that Thiers “admitted to removing a piece of blue sealant from the Reflecting Pool and still had it in his hand when I made contact with him.”

The three defendants were arraigned in court Wednesday and pleaded not guilty to the misdemeanor charges of destruction of property with a value less than $1,000. The judge ordered them to stay away from the Reflecting Pool.

Lawyers for Thiers and Dennison-Gibby declined to comment. CNN has reached out to Carreno’s attorney.

If found guilty of destruction of property, the defendants could be fined up to $1,000 and face a maximum of 180 days behind bars.

Advertisement

The New York Times first reported that three additional people had been charged with damaging the Reflecting Pool.

President Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that vandals caused major damage to the pool by gashing the lining after his administration spent more than $14 million on renovations, though he has not provided evidence to support that claim. The officers who charged Carreno, Thiers and Dennison-Gibby did not accuse them of gashing the lining.

Former Olympic canoeist David Hearn was indicted by a grand jury in Washington, DC, last week for allegedly damaging the Reflecting Pool. Hearn — unlike Carreno, Thiers and Dennison-Gibby – was charged with destruction of property with a value of more than $1,000 which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison, if convicted. He is set to be arraigned in court Thursday.

Crews began draining the Reflecting Pool over the weekend to make repairs, according to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, for the second time in three months.

The move comes after weeks of problems – algae blooms, green-hued water, a chipping bottom and the administration’s allegations of vandalism – that have plagued the iconic landmark, making its woes the subject of national interest.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court financial disclosures reveal how their books add to their income

Published

on

Supreme Court financial disclosures reveal how their books add to their income

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett speaks at the Reagan Library on Sept. 9, 2025, in Simi Valley, Calif. Barrett discussed and signed copies of her new book, Listening to the Law: Reflections on the Court and Constitution.

Mario Tama/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Mario Tama/Getty Images

Even as the Supreme Court was handing down one legal thunderbolt after another last week, the justices were quietly releasing their annual financial reports. Justice Samuel Alito was the only sitting justice to request an extension, which he has done for 15 years. The disclosures do not give a complete account of the justices’ total income and wealth, but they give insights into their concertgoing, guest professorships and even their involvement in youth sports.

In addition to their salaries, much of the justices’ reported income came from their book deals. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson led the pack earning more than $1.1 million last year for a total of roughly $4 million since her memoir, Lovely One, was published in 2024.

Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett and retired Justice Anthony Kennedy also reported income from published books. Earnings from their books ranged from $849,000 for Barrett, to $300,000 for Gorsuch and $88,000 for Sotomayor, whose books include her 2013 autobiography and five children’s books. Justice Clarence Thomas, who previously earned $1.5 million for his 2007 memoir, listed no publisher payments last year, and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, one of 13 co-authors of a 2016 legal treatise, also received no payments last year. Kavanaugh is said to be working on a memoir but he listed no payments for the anticipated book. Alito does have a book coming out in the fall, but with his financial report still outstanding, there is no data on how much he was paid for the work in 2025.

Advertisement

The only two sitting justices who have not written books are Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Elena Kagan.

Many justices also earned income from teaching at law schools. Roberts reported income from New England Law, located in Boston, and Gorsuch reported teaching income from George Mason University in Virginia. Thomas taught classes at Catholic University in Washington, D.C., and Barrett and Kavanaugh taught at Notre Dame Law School. Barrett graduated from the school and began teaching there 23 years ago; Kavanaugh has family connections to Notre Dame.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending