Connect with us

News

Why men should really be reading more fiction

Published

on

Why men should really be reading more fiction

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

A friend sent a meme to a group chat last week that, like many internet memes before it, managed to implant itself deep into my brain and capture an idea in a way that more sophisticated, expansive prose does not always manage. Somewhat ironically, the meme was about the ills of the internet. 

“People in 1999 using the internet as an escape from reality,” the text read, over an often-used image from a TV series of a face looking out of a car window. Below it was another face looking out of a different car window overlaid with the text: “People in 2026 using reality as an escape from the internet.” 

Oof. So simple, yet so spot on. With AI-generated slop — sorry, content — now having overtaken human-generated words and images online, with social media use appearing to have peaked and with “dumb phones” being touted as this year’s status symbol, it does feel as if the tide is beginning to turn towards the general de-enshittification of life. 

Advertisement

And what could be a better way to resist the ever-swelling stream of mediocrity and nonsense on the internet, and to stick it to the avaricious behemoths of the “attention economy”, than to pick up a work of fiction (ideally not purchased on one of these behemoths’ platforms), with no goal other than sheer pleasure and the enrichment of our lives? But while the tide might have started to turn, we don’t seem to have quite got there yet on the reading front, if we are on our way there at all.

Two-fifths of Britons said last year that they had not read a single book in the previous 12 months, according to YouGov. And, as has been noted many times before on both sides of the Atlantic, it is men who are reading the least — just 53 per cent had read any book over the previous year, compared with 66 per cent of women — both in overall numbers and specifically when it comes to fiction.

Yet pointing this out, and lamenting the “disappearance of literary men”, has become somewhat contentious. A much-discussed Vox article last year asked: “Are men’s reading habits truly a national crisis?” suggesting that they were not and pointing out that women only read an average of seven minutes more fiction per day than men (while failing to note that this itself represents almost 60 per cent more reading time).

Meanwhile an UnHerd op-ed last year argued that “the literary man is not dead”, positing that there exists a subculture of male literature enthusiasts keeping the archetype alive and claiming that “podcasts are the new salons”. 

That’s all well and good, but the truth is that there is a gender gap between men and women when it comes to reading and engaging specifically with fiction, and it’s growing.

Advertisement

According to a 2022 survey by the US National Endowment for the Arts, 27.7 per cent of men had read a short story or novel over the previous year, down from 35.1 per cent a decade earlier. Women’s fiction-reading habits declined too, but more slowly and from a higher base: 54.6 per cent to 46.9 per cent, meaning that while women out-read men by 55 per cent in 2012 when it came to fiction, they did so by almost 70 per cent in 2022.

The divide is already apparent in young adulthood, and it has widened too: data from 2025 showed girls in England took an A-Level in English literature at an almost four-times-higher rate than boys, with that gap having grown from a rate of about three times higher just eight years earlier.

So the next question is: should we care and, if so, why? Those who argue that yes, we should, tend to give a few reasons. They point out that reading fiction fosters critical thinking, empathy and improves “emotional vocabulary”. They argue that novels often contain heroic figures and strong, virtuous representations of masculinity that can inspire and motivate modern men. They cite Andrew Tate, the titan of male toxicity, who once said that “reading books is for losers who are afraid to learn from life”, and that “books are a total waste of time”, as an example of whose advice not to follow. 

I agree with all of this — wholeheartedly, I might add. But I’m not sure how many of us, women or men, are picking up books in order to become more virtuous people. Perhaps the more compelling, or at least motivating, reason for reading fiction is simply that it offers a form of pleasure and attention that the modern world is steadily eroding. In a hyper-capitalist culture optimised for skimming and distraction, the ability to sit still with a novel is both subversive and truly gratifying. The real question, then, is why so many men are not picking one up.

jemima.kelly@ft.com

Advertisement

News

Video: Air Force One Turns Around With Trump Aboard

Published

on

Video: Air Force One Turns Around With Trump Aboard

new video loaded: Air Force One Turns Around With Trump Aboard

Air Force One turned around while carrying President Trump due to a “minor electrical issue,” an official said. Trump was on his way to Davos, Switzerland, for the World Economic Forum.

By Shawn Paik

January 21, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Wall Street-backed landlords a target for both Trump and Democrats

Published

on

Wall Street-backed landlords a target for both Trump and Democrats

An aerial view of a housing development in Las Vegas on Aug. 8, 2025.

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Back in 2020, Ashley Maxwell and her husband were looking to buy their first home, near Indianapolis.

“We looked at over 80 homes in probably a span of two months,” she said.

The couple was in a tight spot. They had three kids and were forced to move because their landlord was selling their rental. That pressure made their search all the more frustrating.

Advertisement

“We would pull up to a house, our agent would get out and be like, ‘There’s 10 additional offers, sight unseen, all cash.’ Typically that means it’s an investor,” Maxwell recalled.

The couple, who eventually found a place, was one of many whose path to homeownership was stymied by a nationwide surge of institutional investors, then driven by record-low mortgage rates, snapping up single-family homes to rent out.

It’s an issue that President Trump now aims to take on. In a recent social media post, he said he wants to “ban large institutional investors from buying more single-family homes,” to help bring down housing costs.

It’s a popular idea, especially among some Democrats. But passing such laws has proved difficult, and economists say the link of investor-owned homes to high prices is not so simple.

A cap on investor rentals just took effect in this city

In Fishers, Ind., a suburb of Indianapolis, Republican Mayor Scott Fadness was taken aback when he saw new data in a housing report compiled by his team that showed the extent of investor landlords in his city.

Advertisement

“We have neighborhoods today that are now creeping up to 35, 38% of the homes have been purchased for investment purposes,” he said.

It got so bad, he recalled, that one of his employees who was house hunting sent letters to homeowners, explaining that they were going to work for the city “and would they please consider allowing them to buy the home” instead of an institutional investor.

To address the problem, Fadness last year proposed capping rentals at 10% per neighborhood to protect local homeownership.

“It’s been a source of generational wealth in our country for a very long time, particularly in the middle class,” he said. “I hate to see that go away.”

It’s also more difficult, he said, to deal with code enforcement and other issues when the property owner is an out-of-state corporation.

Advertisement

Realtor groups opposed a cap, arguing it infringed on private property rights and could deprive sellers of the highest bid, but the City Council backed the plan unanimously. The new law just took effect Jan. 1.

“It was the first time I had proposed an ordinance in our community where outside interests, business interests, came into town and spent money trying to kill the legislation,” Fadness said.

It was a rare win for such a proposal. Cities and states across the U.S. have debated restricting investor homebuyers, yet most measures have failed to pass. One proposal went nowhere in Congress, which Trump has said would need to codify any ban. California Gov. Gavin Newsom joined Trump this month in saying he’s determined to do something.

Economists say large investors are not the biggest factor driving home prices

But housing experts say it’s too easy to blame corporate landlords entirely for skyrocketing prices.

“People see the connection, but they don’t necessarily separate out the cause and effect,” said Laurie Goodman, an economist with the Housing Finance Policy Center at the Urban Institute.

Advertisement

Prices do go up where investors buy, but she said, “That is part of their strategy,” because the places they choose are already growing. And often, they buy serious fixer-uppers.

“Most of us don’t have the knowledge to do the repairs,” Goodman said. “[Even] if we did, we couldn’t get the financing.”

Nationally, the largest companies own about 3% of the single-family rental market, with larger shares in some places like the Sunbelt. And the institutional buying spree has cooled from its peak in 2022, as higher interest rates have made homes more expensive.

The main driver of rising prices is a housing shortage, Goodman said, and some investors are actually helping to ease that now, by building their own single-family houses to rent.

“The best way to make housing affordable is to simply build more of it — to increase supply,” she said.

Advertisement

The debate continues in Las Vegas

In Las Vegas, Democratic state Sen. Dina Neal still worries that the build-to-rent trend is undercutting people’s shot at homeownership. She pointed to one corporate investor near her district that built an entire neighborhood of houses to rent.

“They didn’t build the whole entire neighborhood to give it up,” she said. “They wanted to make sure they would secure rental income from 200 different families and keep it.”

What’s more, like Fadness in Indiana, Neal worries that investor rentals are priced so high it can become impossible for many people to save up for a down payment. She said her previous next-door neighbor sold to an investor believing she could trade up, but had to rent a place down the street — from a different corporate investor.

Neal has proposed a cap on corporate landlords three times, but Nevada’s Republican governor, Joe Lombardo, has blocked it, most recently last month.

Neal is surprised — and cautious — now that Trump is taking up her cause. “I am trying to figure out how I entered into a universe where I became aligned with a president who is a nemesis to the Democratic Party,” she laughed.

Advertisement

But if Trump’s interest can persuade more Republicans to join the push, she said she’ll take it.

Continue Reading

News

Video: Snowstorm Causes 100-Vehicle Pileup in Michigan

Published

on

Video: Snowstorm Causes 100-Vehicle Pileup in Michigan

new video loaded: Snowstorm Causes 100-Vehicle Pileup in Michigan

transcript

transcript

Snowstorm Causes 100-Vehicle Pileup in Michigan

More than 100 vehicles slipped and crashed into one another in a chain-reaction pileup on a Michigan interstate on Monday.

“I seen it way ahead and I had to go. I had to go out. I went off the edge.” “This guy got hit too.”

Advertisement
More than 100 vehicles slipped and crashed into one another in a chain-reaction pileup on a Michigan interstate on Monday.

By Jackeline Luna

January 19, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending