Connect with us

Minneapolis, MN

Buss: Response to Minneapolis shooting a moral failure

Published

on

Buss: Response to Minneapolis shooting a moral failure


If another civil war were to break out in the United States, I imagine it would begin with an altercation similar to what took place in Minneapolis on Wednesday.

That’s what made the instantaneous and pejorative response to it by the Trump administration so jarring.

In an incident that recalls the National Guard shooting of student anti-war protesters at Kent State University in 1970, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer shot Renee Good, a 37-year-old U.S. citizen and a mother of three. She had seemingly interjected herself into a major immigration enforcement operation that dispatched 2,000 federal agents to Minneapolis at the direction of Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.

There is a dispute over whether the shooting was in self-defense, and the Trump administration has doubled down on defending the actions of the ICE officer, labeling Good a “domestic terrorist.” Vice President JD Vance alleged on Thursday that Good was part of a left-wing network.

Advertisement

But it’s hard to see the incident as anything other than a complete breakdown in moral clarity about responsibility and the limits of force by the government — and how it is discussed publicly before information could even be known.

Video shared online of the incident, allegedly taken by the officer involved, indicates the confrontation was already off to a bad start. Is filming, easily interpreted as a form of intimidation by law enforcement, standard training for ICE officers?

The ICE removal officer has been identified as Jonathan Ross, a former Army National Guard machine gunner and ex‑Border Patrol agent with extensive experience. He had been dragged by a suspect during a 2025 arrest.

Perhaps he should not have returned to active duty so quickly. The impetus is on law enforcement, whether police officers or ICE officers, to preserve life and contain an unruly and even reckless situation to the best of their ability.

Advertisement

Filming a potential suspect before a government-sanctioned interaction and then physically circling her vehicle to put oneself in danger calls his judgment into question.

Many questions remain about the confrontation, and no doubt instinctual psychology played a larger role in Good’s actions and in Ross’s than we will ever know.

But the immediate, callous response of Noem and Vance to this tragedy is part of a growing pattern of disregard for the collateral damage caused by implementing difficult, controversial policies. This cowboy culture that is causing serious division and violence on the nation’s streets needs to be called out and off.

Sometimes the government has to kill; it doesn’t appear that Good’s death was necessarily one of those instances. No death should ever be celebrated, or the victim castigated as a “deranged leftist,” as Vance called Good, an activist who was reportedly trained to aggressively confront ICE agents.

Despite the immediate escalation, it’s clear that while Good was driving in the opposite direction from Ross, the officer continued to shoot at her. Good lay in the driver’s seat, dying, while onlookers scream in horror. 

Advertisement

Such a staunch and certain defense of the totality of his actions is indefensible. 

No one — U.S. citizen or otherwise — should be gunned down on America’s streets this casually by agents of the government.

It also points to why perhaps immigration operations at the scale Noem directed in Minneapolis shouldn’t be deployed so provocatively. Such a confrontation was bound to occur.

Public safety requires restraint as much as it requires the enforcement of law and order. 

When that restraint fails, it is the duty of the heads of government to call for patience, calm and the truth — and if necessary, take some responsibility.

Advertisement

Americans on all sides should demand accountability for Good’s death and a renewed commitment by the Trump administration to policies and practices that were written to prevent exactly this kind of tragedy.

Kaitlyn Buss’ columns appear in The Detroit News. Reach her at kbuss@detroitnews.com and follow her on X @KaitlynBuss.



Source link

Minneapolis, MN

Jarren Duran Says Fan Crossed Line Before Middle Finger in Minneapolis

Published

on

Jarren Duran Says Fan Crossed Line Before Middle Finger in Minneapolis


When Jarren Duran flipped up the middle finger on his left hand in the direction of fans at Target Field on Tuesday night, he was responding to someone who allegedly told him to kill himself.

In the fifth inning, and the Twins leading the Red Sox 5-0, the Boston outfielder grounded out to second base. As he jogged back towards the dugout, the television cameras caught him using his middle finger to allegedly respond to the fan.

“Somebody told me to kill myself,” Duran explained. “I’m used to it at this point. S*** happens. I’m going to flip somebody off if they say something to me. It is what it is. I shouldn’t react like that, but that stuff is still kind of triggering. It happens.”

The motive behind the fan’s alleged verbal abuse is unknown, but Duran has been public about his past mental health struggles, including battling depression and contemplating suicide. In April 2025, Netflix released “The Clubhouse: A Year With the Red Sox,” and the fourth episode of the series, titled “Still Alive,” focused on Duran and his mental health journey.

Advertisement

A few weeks after the series was released, a fan in Cleveland was ejected after saying “something inappropriate” to Duran.

Advertisement

“When you open yourself up like that, you also open yourself up to the enemies. But I have a good support staff around me, teammates, coaches. There were fans that were supporting me, so that was awesome,” Duran said after the Cleveland incident.

After the Twins beat the Red Sox 6-0 on Tuesday night, the Twins’ submitted a victory post on social media with the tease, “Kept it classy.”

Advertisement

Duran, 29, was suspended by Major League Baseball for two games in 2024 forshouting a homophobic slur at a fan. That fan was accused of criticizing Duran’s batting. Duran wound up donating the amount he would’ve been paid in the two games to Greater PFLAG Boston, an organization that advocates for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer people.

“I feel awful knowing how many people I offended and disappointed,” Durran said after the 2024 incident. He admitted that what he said was “horrific,” and acknowledged that “young fans are supposed to be able to look up to me as a role model.”

If you or someone you know is struggling with thoughts of suicide, call or text 988 to reach the Suicide and Crisis Lifeline or reach the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 800-273-TALK (8255). You can also text MN to 741741. 

Advertisement

Add us as a preferred source on Google





Source link

Continue Reading

Minneapolis, MN

Minneapolis man dies after neighbor assaulted him

Published

on

Minneapolis man dies after neighbor assaulted him


A man has died days after he was assaulted by his neighbor in Minneapolis. 

Minneapolis deadly assault

What we know:

Advertisement

According to Minneapolis police, on April 5, officers responded to an apartment building on the 300 block of Hennepin Avenue. 

Officers found a man in his 70s unconscious. He was then taken to the hospital. 

Advertisement

Police learned through surveillance video that the victim had been hit by another 61-year-old man after a verbal argument. 

The 61-year-old man was found to also be a resident in the apartment building and was later arrested. 

Police announced Tuesday that the victim died at the hospital from his injuries. 

Advertisement

The suspect was initially charged with first-degree assault, but those are expected to be amended to include homicide, police said. 

What we don’t know:

Advertisement

Police did not say what led up to the altercation between the two men. 

The Source: A press release from the Minneapolis Police Department. 

Crime and Public SafetyMinneapolis
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Minneapolis, MN

Minnesota Cost Of Living: Most And Least Expensive Places Ranked

Published

on

Minnesota Cost Of Living: Most And Least Expensive Places Ranked


MINNESOTA — The cost of living varies widely across Minnesota, with new data from Niche highlighting a sharp divide between Twin Cities neighborhoods and smaller communities across the state.

The Niche rankings are based on a mix of housing costs, income levels, taxes, and everyday expenses like groceries and gas, using data from the U.S. Census, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and Tax Foundation.

Many of the highest-cost areas are concentrated in Minneapolis, St. Paul, and nearby suburbs, while the most affordable places are largely found in rural and small-town Minnesota.

15 Most Expensive Places To Live In Minnesota

Niche places several Twin Cities neighborhoods and suburbs in its second-highest cost-of-living tier. No Minnesota locations ranked in the highest tier.

Advertisement

Among them:

  • Macalester-Groveland (St. Paul)
  • King Field (Minneapolis)
  • St. Anthony Park (St. Paul)
  • Downtown East (Minneapolis)
  • East Harriet (Minneapolis)
  • Summit Hill (St. Paul)
  • Bryn Mawr (Minneapolis)
  • North Loop (Minneapolis)
  • King Field (Minneapolis)
  • Edina
  • Linden Hills (Minneapolis)
  • Fulton (Minneapolis)
  • Lowry Hill (Minneapolis)
  • East Isles (Minneapolis)
  • Lynnhurst (Minneapolis)

15 Most Affordable Places To Live In Minnesota

At the other end of the spectrum, Niche identified a number of towns with significantly lower costs of living.

These communities are spread across southern, western, and northern Minnesota and tend to have smaller populations and lower housing costs.

Among the most affordable places:

  • Luverne
  • International Falls
  • Pipestone
  • Caledonia
  • Jackson
  • Windom
  • Redwood Falls
  • Ely
  • Breckenridge
  • Blue Earth
  • Lake Crystal
  • Austin
  • Sleepy Eye
  • Mountain Iron
  • Thief River Falls

The data underscores a familiar pattern in Minnesota: higher costs in the metro area and more affordable living in smaller towns, often with trade-offs in access to jobs, amenities, and services.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending