Connect with us

News

What Threats Does My Vote Really Face?

Published

on

What Threats Does My Vote Really Face?

Poll workers verify your information and accept your ballot.

Fake or illegal votes are rare. Voting machines and staff can make minor errors accepting ballots, but there are checks to catch them. The real threat is the perception that fraud is a widespread problem, officials and experts say, if it keeps voters from turning out or fuels unrest.

Will poll watchers interfere?

Local Election Workers Count Votes

Advertisement

Most use technology to count ballots and keep a paper record to audit them.

Will it be harder to vote by mail?

Most voters will have a seamless experience casting a mail ballot, but more of these ballots could be challenged in 2024. Some states adopted stricter rules after the 2020 surge in mail voting, such as tighter signature or ID requirements and shorter ballot return windows.

What about foreign interference?

U.S. security agencies say that foreign adversaries cannot alter our election results. Instead, they may spread false claims about the results that put election staff and their work at risk.

Advertisement

Are election workers in danger?

Election administrators, who have faced a rise in personal threats since 2020, are preparing for protests, some by hiring security guards and installing panic buttons. Protests could put the timely counting of votes at risk.

After local officials review and certify results, states must finalize them by Dec. 11.

What if results are contested?

Recounts are automatic in some states if the results are close, and candidates and voters can petition or sue for a recount in others. Lawsuits contesting results or alleging fraud could delay the final tally in some places, though courts must move swiftly.

Advertisement

Could officials refuse to certify?

County boards must certify their results once checks are complete. But since 2020, officials in at least 20 counties across eight states have voted to deny or delay certification, with many making false claims of fraud.

States can go to the courts to force boards to certify. It is unlikely, but a lengthy legal battle could prevent a state from certifying its results by the deadline, which could put the counting of its electors at risk.

The Electoral College chooses the president, based on state results. Electors meet on Dec. 17.

What about fake electors?

Advertisement

The Electoral Count Reform Act, passed in 2022, makes clear that the state’s top election official must certify the electors pledged to the candidate who wins the most votes.

Attempts by Trump allies in 2020 to push officials to designate alternate electors in states where he lost would be near impossible under the new law.

Election officials and experts worry that false claims about fraudulent votes and electors could spark protests and put the electors’ ability to vote at risk.

Congress Performs the Final Count

On Jan. 6, a newly elected Congress meets at the Capitol to finalize the electoral votes, overseen by the vice president.

Advertisement

Could they reject results?

It is possible that some members of Congress could object to a state’s certification of electoral votes. They would need support in both the House and Senate to challenge the results, and a majority of both chambers to reject them.

If no candidate wins a majority of electoral votes, the House would vote to choose the president.

Members of the public who object to the results could protest — as an angry mob did on Jan. 6, 2021 — to try to stop Congress from counting the electoral votes. The Department of Homeland Security has said it will ramp up security on Jan. 6.

Advertisement

News

Video: Behind the Supreme Court’s Push to Expand Presidential Power

Published

on

Video: Behind the Supreme Court’s Push to Expand Presidential Power

new video loaded: Behind the Supreme Court’s Push to Expand Presidential Power

For more than a decade, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority has chipped away at Congress’s power to insulate independent agencies from politics. Now, the court has signaled its willingness to expand presidential power once again.

By Ann E. Marimow, Claire Hogan, Stephanie Swart and Pierre Kattar

December 12, 2025

Continue Reading

News

Europe’s rocky relations with Donald Trump

Published

on

Europe’s rocky relations with Donald Trump

Gideon talks to Jens Stoltenberg, Nato’s former secretary-general, about Ukraine and Europe’s strategic priorities after recent scathing criticism from US president Donald Trump over its failure to end the war: ‘They talk but they don’t produce.’ Clip: Politico

Free links to read more on this topic:

The White House’s rupture with the western alliance

Trump pushes for ‘free economic zone’ in Donbas, says Zelenskyy

Friedrich Merz offers to host Ukraine talks so deal not done ‘above Europe’s head’

Advertisement

Ukraine’s ‘fortress belt’ that Donald Trump wants to trade for peace

Subscribe to The Rachman Review wherever you get your podcasts – please listen, rate and subscribe.

Presented by Gideon Rachman. Produced by Fiona Symon. Sound design is by Breen Turner and the executive producer is Flo Phillips.

Follow Gideon on Bluesky or X @gideonrachman.bsky.social, @gideonrachman

View our accessibility guide.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

News

Trump announces pardon for Tina Peters, increasing pressure to free her though he can’t erase state charges | CNN Politics

Published

on

Trump announces pardon for Tina Peters, increasing pressure to free her though he can’t erase state charges | CNN Politics

President Donald Trump announced Thursday he is granting Tina Peters a full federal pardon, which is likely to increase the pressure campaign to free the former Colorado clerk from state prison even though he cannot erase her state charges.

“Tina is sitting in a Colorado prison for the ‘crime’ of demanding Honest Elections. Today I am granting Tina a full Pardon for her attempts to expose Voter Fraud in the Rigged 2020 Presidential Election,” the president wrote on Truth Social.

Peters, the former Republican clerk of Mesa, Colorado, was found guilty last year on state charges of participating in a scheme to breach voting systems that hoped to prove Trump’s false claims of mass voter fraud in 2020. She was sentenced to nine years in prison and is serving her sentence at a women’s prison in Pueblo, Colorado.

Peters is currently the only Trump ally in prison for crimes related to the attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. She still believes that election was stolen, her lawyers recently told CNN. Her lawyers have also raised concerns about her physical safety and told a judge that her health is declining behind bars.

Trump’s pardon has no legal impact on her state conviction and incarceration. But the administration has been pressuring Colorado officials to set her free or at least transfer her into federal custody, where she could be moved into a more comfortable facility. The Justice Department even stepped in to support Peters’ unsuccessful attempt to convince a federal judge to release her from prison.

Advertisement

After months of hearings and legal filings, a federal judge in Denver rejected her federal lawsuit seeking release on Monday, concluding that state courts are the proper venue for her to challenger her conviction.

Democratic Colorado Gov. Jared Polis in a statement defended Peters’ conviction. “No President has jurisdiction over state law nor the power to pardon a person for state convictions. This is a matter for the courts to decide, and we will abide by court orders,” he said.

Polis has previously said he won’t pardon Peters as part of any quid-pro-quo deal.

Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser, a Democrat who is fighting to uphold Peters’ conviction and keep her behind bars, also dismissed the pardon in a statement.

“The idea that a president could pardon someone tried and convicted in state court has no precedent in American law, would be an outrageous departure from what our constitution requires, and will not hold up,” Weiser said.

Advertisement

One of her lawyers sent a letter to Trump earlier this month, making the case for a pardon. Those efforts were successful at securing a symbolic clemency action from Trump, however, only Polis has the power to pardon Peters for her state crimes and set her free.

CNN’s Kaitlan Collins contributed to this report.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending