Connect with us

News

Nasdaq hits record high as tech stocks rebound from summer sell-off

Published

on

Nasdaq hits record high as tech stocks rebound from summer sell-off

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Tech stocks propelled the Nasdaq Composite to a new high on Friday for the first time since July in a sharp turnaround after falling as much as 15 per cent during the summer.

The technology-heavy index rose 1.5 per cent to 18690.01, surpassing the previous intraday peak of 18671.07. It was trading 1.2 per cent higher in the early afternoon.

“Each time we panic, the market continues to rise. At some point you stop panicking,” said Luca Paolini, chief strategist at Pictet Asset Management.

Advertisement

Wall Street’s benchmark S&P 500 index, which is less heavily weighted towards tech groups, regained its record highs more quickly after the mid-summer sell-off. Tech stocks were among the worst hit in the volatility, and many analysts had predicted that falling interest rates would shift investors’ focus from big tech companies to more cyclical sectors and heavily indebted groups.

However, the Nasdaq’s return to a peak comes as the burgeoning “rotation” has lost steam, with the largest tech stocks once again outperforming the broader market since the central bank cut interest rates in mid-September.

The S&P 500 information technology sub-index has gained 8 per cent since the September rate cut, compared with around a 4 per cent gain for the broader index.

Investors have scaled back their expectations of further US interest rate cuts since the Federal Reserve made its first reduction since the pandemic in September.

Irene Tunkel, chief US equity strategist at BCA Research, said the “Magnificent Seven” large tech companies were benefiting from both stronger earnings and investor optimism over artificial intelligence.

Advertisement

In a reference to next month’s US presidential election, in which Donald Trump is facing Kamala Harris, she added that such investor enthusiasm for tech was “not especially sensitive to the economic or election cycles”.

Tunkel described investors’ stance as a “heads I win, tails you lose” bet, in which tech companies prospered in a variety of economic scenarios.

Still, not every large tech group has benefited equally from the recent rally. Only three of the so-called Magnificent Seven — Nvidia, Apple and Meta — have set new records since July.

Tesla is the only one of the seven that has yet to reach the heights it set during the mid-pandemic market boom of 2021, but was one of the biggest contributors to the index’s final push to a record this week. Shares in the electric-car maker jumped more than 20 per cent on Thursday after it reported better than expected results, and climbed further on Friday.

Some analysts expect other sectors to rejoin Big Tech in driving the market higher, as earnings improve and as political uncertainty reduces after the November 5 election.

Advertisement

Third-quarter earnings season started this month with above-consensus reports from large banks.

Mona Mahajan, senior strategist at Edward Jones, said earnings growth outside the tech sector could also lead to a “broadening” in stock performance. “We think there are opportunities elsewhere,” she added.

News

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

Published

on

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

new video loaded: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

transcript

transcript

F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

“I imagine there will be some difficult moments today for all of us as we try to provide answers to how a multitude of errors led to this tragedy.” “We have an entire tower who took it upon themselves to try to raise concerns over and over and over and over again, only to get squashed by management and everybody above them within F.A.A. Were they set up for failure?” “They were not adequately prepared to do the jobs they were assigned to do.”

Advertisement
The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

By Meg Felling

January 27, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

Published

on

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

President Trump speaks as U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth looks on during a meeting of his Cabinet at the White House in December 2025.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Relatives of two Trinidadian men killed in an airstrike last October are suing the U.S. government for wrongful death and for carrying out extrajudicial killings.

The case, filed in Massachusetts, is the first lawsuit over the strikes to land in a U.S. federal court since the Trump administration launched a campaign to target vessels off the coast of Venezuela. The American government has carried out three dozen such strikes since September, killing more than 100 people.

Among them are Chad Joseph, 26, and Rishi Samaroo, 41, who relatives say died in what President Trump described as “a lethal kinetic strike” on Oct. 14, 2025. The president posted a short video that day on social media that shows a missile targeting a ship, which erupts in flame.

Advertisement

“This is killing for sport, it’s killing for theater and it’s utterly lawless,” said Baher Azmy, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights. “We need a court of law to rein in this administration and provide some accountability to the families.”

The White House and Pentagon justify the strikes as part of a broader push to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the U.S. The Pentagon declined to comment on the lawsuit, saying it doesn’t comment on ongoing litigation.

But the new lawsuit described Joseph and Samaroo as fishermen doing farm work in Venezuela, with no ties to the drug trade. Court papers said they were headed home to family members when the strike occurred and now are presumed dead.

Neither man “presented a concrete, specific, and imminent threat of death or serious physical injury to the United States or anyone at all, and means other than lethal force could have reasonably been employed to neutralize any lesser threat,” according to the lawsuit.

Advertisement

Lenore Burnley, the mother of Chad Joseph, and Sallycar Korasingh, the sister of Rishi Samaroo, are the plaintiffs in the case.

Their court papers allege violations of the Death on the High Seas Act, a 1920 law that makes the U.S. government liable if its agents engage in negligence that results in wrongful death more than 3 miles off American shores. A second claim alleges violations of the Alien Tort Statute, which allows foreign citizens to sue over human rights violations such as deaths that occurred outside an armed conflict, with no judicial process.

The American Civil Liberties Union, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and Jonathan Hafetz at Seton Hall University School of Law are representing the plaintiffs.

“In seeking justice for the senseless killing of their loved ones, our clients are bravely demanding accountability for their devastating losses and standing up against the administration’s assault on the rule of law,” said Brett Max Kaufman, senior counsel at the ACLU.

U.S. lawmakers have raised questions about the legal basis for the strikes for months but the administration has persisted.

Advertisement

—NPR’s Quil Lawrence contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

News

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

Published

on

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

new video loaded: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

A frame-by-frame assessment of actions by Alex Pretti and the two officers who fired 10 times shows how lethal force came to be used against a target who didn’t pose a threat.

By Devon Lum, Haley Willis, Alexander Cardia, Dmitriy Khavin and Ainara Tiefenthäler

January 26, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending