Connect with us

News

Macron vs. Le Pen: The French presidential election runoff explained | CNN

Published

on


Paris
CNN

It’s Macron vs. Le Pen, spherical two.

France’s presidential election will probably be a rematch of the 2017 contest, when the far proper’s Marine Le Pen confronted off in opposition to political newcomer Emmanuel Macron.

Macron received that race by practically two votes to at least one.

However whereas the candidates stay the identical, the 2022 race is shaping as much as be a really totally different affair.

Advertisement

Right here’s all the pieces you have to know.

To elect their new President, French voters head to the polls twice.

The primary vote, on Sunday, noticed 12 candidates run in opposition to one another. They certified for the race by securing endorsements from 500 mayors and/or native councilors from throughout the nation.

Macron and Le Pen acquired essentially the most votes, however since neither received greater than 50%, they are going to head to a runoff on Sunday, April 24.

This isn’t the one nationwide vote France faces this 12 months – parliamentary elections are additionally as a result of happen in June.

Advertisement

Macron and Le Pen will maintain one debate on the night of April 20 that will probably be aired by French broadcasters France 2 and TF1.

The runoff election will then happen on Sunday April 24.

Candidates aren’t allowed to marketing campaign the day earlier than the vote, or on election day itself, and the media will probably be topic to strict reporting restrictions from the day earlier than the election till polls shut at 8 p.m. Sunday in France.

A a lot nearer contest than the 2017 election.

Macron and Le Pen each elevated their whole share of the vote on this 12 months’s first spherical in contrast with 2017, however surveys forward of the primary spherical on April 10 confirmed Le Pen loved a late surge of assist in March.

Advertisement

Polling by Ifop-Fiducial launched on April 10 suggests Macron would win a second-round contest in opposition to Le Pen by simply 51% to 49%. Macron’s benefit has elevated within the days because the first spherical outcomes got here in, however two weeks is a very long time in politics – and lots may change between now and election day.

Political analysts typically say the French vote with their coronary heart in spherical one, then vote with their head in spherical two – which means they select their supreme candidate first, then go for the lesser of two evils within the second spherical.

Macron noticed this play out in 2017. He and Le Pen scored 24% and 21.3% of the primary spherical vote after which 66.1% and 33.9% within the second spherical, respectively.

To be reelected, Macron will doubtless must persuade far-left candidate Jean-Luc Melenchon’s supporters to again him. Melenchon got here in third place with 22% of the vote. On Sunday, Melenchon informed his supporters “we should not give a single vote to Mrs. Le Pen,” however didn’t explicitly again Macron.

Most dropping candidates urged their supporters to again Macron to dam the far proper from profitable the presidency.

Advertisement

Eric Zemmour, a right-wing former TV pundit identified for his inflammatory rhetoric, urged his supporters to again Le Pen.

The surprising.

At the beginning of 2022, the election appeared set to be an necessary referendum on the rising reputation of the French far proper. It has been 20 years since a French President was reelected, so the vote was shaping as much as be one of many nation’s most watched political races in a long time.

Then Russia invaded Ukraine.

With Europe’s eyes mounted firmly on Russian President Vladimir Putin’s bloody warfare, priorities have rapidly shifted: Ammunition stockpiles, high-stakes diplomacy and even the specter of a nuclear strike have all entered the nationwide debate.

Macron assumed the function of Europe’s statesman, taking him away from the marketing campaign path, whereas Le Pen was pressured to backtrack on her earlier assist for Putin.

Advertisement
Russian President Vladimir Putin meets Marine Le Pen at the Kremlin in Moscow on March 24, 2017.

France’s political panorama, for one.

Macron’s election successfully blew up the normal heart of French politics. In years previous, a lot of his voters would have flocked to the normal center-left and center-right events, the Socialists and the Republicans.

However Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo, the Socialist candidate, and Valérie Pécresse, the Republican candidate, failed to influence voters to desert the centrist candidate already in workplace. Each polled below 5% within the first spherical.

Emmanuel Macron is an ex-investment banker and alumnus of a few of France’s most elite faculties. He was a political novice earlier than changing into President, and that is solely the second political election he has ever stood in.

However he’s not an upstart and should run on a blended report.

His bold plan to bolster the European Union’s autonomy and geopolitical heft received him respect overseas and at dwelling, regardless that his makes an attempt to win over Donald Trump or to forestall the AUKUS submarine deal, and his unsuccessful diplomatic efforts to avert warfare in Ukraine could possibly be thought of failures.

Advertisement

Macron’s home insurance policies are extra divisive and fewer in style. His dealing with of the yellow vest motion, one among France’s most extended protests in a long time, was broadly panned, and his report on the Covid-19 pandemic is inconclusive.

Macron’s signature coverage throughout the disaster – requiring folks to indicate proof of vaccination to go about their lives as regular – helped enhance vaccination charges however fired up a vocal minority in opposition to his presidency.

Forward of the primary spherical of this election, Macron refused to debate his opponents, and he has hardly campaigned himself. Whereas his pole place within the race has by no means actually been below risk, specialists consider his technique has been to keep away from the political mudslinging so long as doable to maintain the deal with his picture as essentially the most presidential of all of the candidates.

Marine Le Pen is essentially the most recognizable determine of the French far proper. She is the daughter of Jean-Marie Le Pen, who based the Nationwide Entrance, the predecessor to Le Pen’s present political celebration.

The youthful Le Pen has tried to rebrand the celebration, because it has lengthy been considered as racist and anti-Semitic.

Advertisement

That is her third shot on the presidency. This 12 months and in 2017, she outperformed her father within the first spherical of the vote.

In 2017, Le Pen campaigned as France’s reply to Trump: A right-leaning firebrand who vowed to guard France’s forgotten working class from immigrants, globalization and expertise that was rendering their jobs out of date.

Since then, she has deserted a few of her most controversial coverage proposals, like leaving the European Union.

However by and huge, her financial nationalist stance, views on immigration, skepticism of Europe and place on Islam in France – she desires to make it unlawful for ladies to put on headscarves in public – haven’t modified. “Stopping uncontrolled immigration” and “eradicating Islamist ideologies” are her manifesto’s two priorities.

Le Pen has, nevertheless, tried to melt her tone, particularly round Islam and the EU within the wake of Brexit.

Advertisement

As an alternative, she has campaigned arduous on pocketbook points, promising measures that she claims will put 150 euros to 200 euros ($162 to $216) within the coffers of every family, together with a pledge to take away gross sales tax from 100 family items.

The technique seems to have labored.

Le Pen’s efficiency within the first spherical of the 2022 presidential election was her finest end result within the 3 times she has run.

What function does the Ukraine warfare play within the upcoming French elections?

The price of dwelling is among the many prime points for the French citizens this 12 months. Confronted with the financial fallout from the pandemic, excessive power costs and the warfare in Ukraine, voters are feeling the pinch, regardless of beneficiant authorities assist.

Advertisement

Whereas monetary pressures could also be inadequate to whitewash some candidates’ extremism in voters’ minds, they could push some to search for unorthodox solutions to their issues.

The preventing in Ukraine is a good distance from the bistros and cafes of France, however the battle is actually on voters’ minds. Simply shy of 90% of French folks had been anxious concerning the warfare within the final week of March, based on Ifop. Given his challengers’ patchy report on standing as much as Putin, this has doubtless performed in Macron’s favor up to now.

Notably absent from the first-round debate was the environmental disaster. Though the significance of local weather protections is gaining traction globally, it’s much less of a priority in France, which sourced 75% of its electrical energy wants in 2020 from nuclear power, based on the French surroundings ministry. Most candidates within the first spherical backed the sort of nuclear growth Macron has already introduced, so there may be little divergence on this subject.

Nonetheless, Macron and Le Pen have sparred over wind and solar energy. Le Pen argues that the 2 are costly and inefficient – she additionally says wind generators have scarred the panorama of the normal French countryside – so she desires to scrap subsidies for each. Macron desires to additional put money into each applied sciences.

The Macron and Le Pen campaigns are promising two very totally different visions for the way forward for France.

Advertisement

Macron guarantees to proceed forging forward with a globalized, free market-focused France on the head of a strong EU. Le Pen desires to utterly upend the established order with protectionist financial insurance policies and a revamping of Paris’ relationship with its allies and adversaries.

However in the long run, the election could merely come all the way down to which candidate France dislikes least: The President who’s broadly seen as elitist and out of contact, or the challenger finest identified for her inflammatory rhetoric on Islam and assist for authoritarians.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Donald Trump’s trial ends with duelling portrayals of star witness Michael Cohen

Published

on

Donald Trump’s trial ends with duelling portrayals of star witness Michael Cohen

Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

Donald Trump should not be convicted on the word of “the greatest liar of all time”, the former president’s defence told a New York jury during closing statements at the former president’s “hush money” trial, while prosecutors defended the account given by their star witness.

The days-long testimony of Michael Cohen, a former Trump acolyte turned sworn enemy, is crucial to establishing that the then-presidential candidate orchestrated a scheme to buy the silence of porn actor Stormy Daniels, who alleged an extramarital affair in the lead-up to the 2016 election.

Cohen, then a lawyer for Trump, paid Daniels with $130,000 of his own money. Trump is charged with falsely recording reimbursements to Cohen as legal expenses, in order to circumvent election laws.

Advertisement

Both sides homed in on Cohen during their closing statements, which lasted for nine hours on Tuesday.

Todd Blanche, an attorney for Trump, told jurors that Cohen — who once also acted as Trump’s general purpose “fixer” — had previously lied to federal judges, to US Congress, to his family and to banks, and was therefore the “human embodiment of reasonable doubt”. Cohen pleaded guilty to a suite of federal charges in 2018 and is a convicted perjurer.

Cohen “is biased and motivated to tell you a story that is not true”, Blanche added. Cohen had revealed he has made more than $1mn from books and podcasts in which he recounts his animus towards Trump.

In response, prosecutors spent hours walking the jury through cheques, invoices, text messages, call logs and even extracts from Trump’s books that they said supported Cohen’s narrative. “Those documents tell you everything you need to know,” assistant district attorney Joshua Steinglass said. “You don’t need Michael Cohen to connect those dots.”

Steinglass emphasised that the prosecution did not “choose Michael Cohen as a witness” or “pick him up at the witness store”.

Advertisement

“The defendant chose Michael Cohen,” he said. “He was his fixer.” Trump was “frugal, immersed in the details and insists on signing his own cheques” for whom the “cardinal sin” is overpaying for a service, Steinglass claimed, casting doubt on the idea that Trump was ignorant of how the alleged reimbursement scheme was set up.

Trump is a “micromanager” who “set in motion a chain of events that led to the creation of the false business records”, Steinglass claimed. Cohen’s payment — designed to prevent a damaging story from leaking — amounted to a “campaign contribution that massively exceeded the $2,700 limit” but also violated city, state and federal tax laws, he claimed.

“The law is the law and applies to everyone equally,” he told jurors as he wrapped up his hours-long presentation.

The duelling remarks came as the trial entered its final stretch, after the testimony of 22 witnesses over five weeks, including Daniels.

A verdict could come as soon as Wednesday, when the seven men and five women who make up the jury are likely to be handed the case for deliberations.

Advertisement

If found guilty, Trump is unlikely to be jailed but would probably face financial penalties and, if he were to win November’s election, would become the first US president to be a convicted criminal. He is also likely to appeal against any conviction. The trial — which comes in one of four criminal cases he is facing — has done little to dent his standing in the presidential polls.

While closing arguments were taking place on Tuesday, the campaign team for President Joe Biden for the first time sent surrogates to speak outside the Manhattan courthouse, including Hollywood actor Robert De Niro and two former police officers who were at the Capitol during the January 6 2021 riots and are now campaigning for the incumbent president.

Robert De Niro made a surprise appearance at a Biden campaign event outside the New York courthouse on Tuesday © Brendan McDermid/Reuters

“Donald Trump wants to destroy not only this city but the country, and eventually he could destroy the world,” said De Niro, a native New Yorker. “He doesn’t belong in my city,” the actor added. “I don’t know where he belongs, but he certainly doesn’t belong here.”

Trump, who was joined in court by his sons Eric and Don Jr, and by his daughter Tiffany, once again decried the case as “election interference” in his morning remarks. “They should have brought this case seven years ago, not in the middle of a presidential election,” he said.

Additional reporting by Lauren Fedor

Advertisement

Have your say

Joe Biden vs Donald Trump: tell us how the 2024 US election will affect you

Continue Reading

News

Mormon Crickets Are Causing Crashes in Nevada

Published

on

Mormon Crickets Are Causing Crashes in Nevada


In Nevada, Mormon crickets are back—and in some areas, they’re making things extremely messy. The Eureka County Sheriff’s Office has warned drivers to beware of “Mormon cricket sludge” on the roads, NBC News reports. In a Facebook post, the sheriff’s office said the slippery remains of insects run over by vehicles caused several crashes on Interstate 80 over the weekend. The combination of smashed Mormon crickets and rain makes roadways “EXTREMELY slick and unpredictable for stopping distance,” the sheriff’s office said.


During the insects’ migration last year, road crews in Elko, Nevada had to use plows to clear the roads of squashed Mormon crickets, which gave off a stench described as “like fish or dog feces.” Last week, an elementary school in Sparks, Nevada, had to cancel outdoor activities after it was inundated with the insects. Teacher Sybella Pope-Sears told News 4 it looked like the lawn was moving. KLAS notes that despite the name, Mormon crickets are a species of katydid that “resembles fat grasshoppers that can’t fly and can be up to two inches long.” (More Mormon crickets stories.)

Advertisement

Continue Reading

News

Israeli tanks enter central Rafah

Published

on

Israeli tanks enter central Rafah

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Israel stepped up its military offensive in Rafah on Tuesday, sending tanks into the heart of Gaza’s southernmost city despite growing international condemnation of the operation.

In the wake of a lethal Israeli air strike over the weekend that killed dozens of civilians, Israel pressed farther towards Rafah’s centre with military vehicles taking positions near the Awda roundabout, according to eyewitnesses.

At least five Israeli military combat brigades were operating by Tuesday in Rafah and the adjoining frontier with Egypt, called the Philadelphi corridor, pushing westwards into more densely populated areas of the city.

Advertisement

The scale of the military deployment suggests Israel is mounting its most significant operation inside Gaza for several months.

Israel considers Rafah Hamas’s last stronghold in Gaza and launched its assault earlier this month despite widespread international concern for the 1.4mn Palestinians that had sought refuge in the city.

Humanitarian organisations have warned about the risks to civilians of an operation in Rafah, where hundreds of thousands of Palestinians are sheltering, but the US state department on Tuesday said it did not believe Israel’s offensive amounted to a full-scale military assault that would cross any red lines set by President Joe Biden.

Matthew Miller, a state department spokesperson, said the US judged Israel’s operations to be on a more limited scale than its previous operations in Khan Younis and Gaza City. “This so far is a different type of military operation,” he added.

“We will continue to emphasise to Israel their obligation to comply fully with international humanitarian law, minimise the impact of their operations on civilians, and maximise the flow of humanitarian assistance to those in need,” Miller said.

Advertisement

According to the UN, about 1mn people have fled Rafah ahead of advancing Israeli troops, to what Israel describes as humanitarian “safe zones”, but which international aid groups have criticised as lacking basic infrastructure and supplies.

“Many citizens are trapped in the middle of the city,” said one Palestinian in the area.

Local officials in the Rafah governorate said later in the day that 21 people were killed, and dozens injured, by Israeli fire in an encampment of tents for the displaced in the city’s western outskirts.

The Financial Times could not immediately establish more details relating to the incident. Israel’s military denied any such attack: “Contrary to the reports from the last few hours, the [Israel Defense Forces] did not strike in the humanitarian area in Al-Mawasi.”

A woman reacts as Palestinians inspect tents on Tuesday after an Israeli army operation on an area in Rafah previously designated by the army as safe for displaced Palestinians © Haitham Imad/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

The report came just two days after an Israeli air strike killed at least 45 people in another camp for displaced people in the north-western Tal as-Sultan neighbourhood.

Advertisement

Miller said the US had expressed its “deep concern” to Israel over the incident and added that Washington was waiting for the results of the full Israeli investigation into the incident.

He noted that the IDF’s preliminary conclusions were that the strike hit 1.7km away from the area where civilians were seeking refuge.

Israeli leaders have made clear that nothing will stop the Rafah offensive, which is a bid to dismantle the last four standing Hamas battalions in the territory as well as to rescue Israeli hostages that the IDF says are being held in the area.

The IDF has also seized at least 50 per cent of the 14km-long Philadelphi corridor, according to one Israeli official. IDF infantry and combat engineers have been working to locate and destroy tunnels connecting Gaza to Egypt’s Sinai peninsula, which Hamas has allegedly used for years to smuggle weapons and commercial goods.

IDF spokesperson Daniel Hagari said the military was working “in a precise way, more accurate, more safe and sometimes slower” than past operations in the strip over the past seven months of war.

Advertisement

Hagari added that the military investigation was ongoing into the exact cause of the massive fires that raged through the makeshift shelters in Rafah over the weekend after an Israeli strike killed two senior Hamas operatives in a nearby compound.

According to Hagari, a preliminary Israeli military investigation has found that the strike, which deployed two relatively small 17kg munitions, hit only the targeted compound. But he said “another something” caused a second compound nearby to ignite.

“Our munition alone could not have ignited a fire of this size,” Hagari added, while emphasising that the camp was almost 200 metres away from the attack site. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday called it a “tragic mistake”.

Martin Griffiths, the UN’s aid chief, said “no place is safe in Gaza”, as he described the attack at the weekend as an “abomination”.

“We have also warned that a military operation in Rafah would lead to a slaughter,” he said. “Whether the attack [at the weekend] was a war crime or a ‘tragic mistake’, for the people of Gaza, there is no debate.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending