Connect with us

News

From conviction to freedom: A timeline of the Adnan Syed case

Published

on

From conviction to freedom: A timeline of the Adnan Syed case

BALTIMORE – Adnan Syed spent greater than 20 years in jail following his conviction within the 1999 dying of his ex-girlfriend, Hae Min Lee.

Final month, after two months in jail, Syed’s homicide conviction was vacated, and he was let out.

Syed, who was a 17-year-old pupil at Woodlawn Excessive College, was charged within the dying of 17-year-old Lee, and located responsible of first-degree homicide in 2000.

The case first acquired nationwide consideration in 2014 the hit podcast “Serial” raised questions in regards to the prosecution.  

On Tuesday, prosecutors dropped all costs after DNA check outcomes got here again that excluded Syed.

Advertisement

It has been a protracted highway from conviction to freedom for Syed.

WJZ compiled a timeline of occasions from the 1999 dying of Lee to when Syed’s costs have been dropped.


Recapping the vital occasions main as much as Adnan Syed’s launch from jail

01:22

Advertisement

Timeline of Occasions

Jan. 13, 1999: Hae Min Lee was reported lacking when she did not decide up her youthful cousin from daycare. Lee was a pupil at Woodlawn Excessive College in Baltimore County. 

Feb. 9, 1999: Lee’s partially buried physique was positioned by somebody in Leakin Park in Baltimore. It was decided Lee was strangled to dying.

Feb. 1999: Police constructed a case in opposition to Syed, largely on the testimony of a person named Jay Wilds, who on the time had greater than 20 run-ins with police — together with aggravated assault in opposition to a former girlfriend.

Wilds struck a deal and claimed that Syed requested him to assist bury Hae Min’s physique. He rapidly turned the centerpiece of their case, regardless of altering his testimony a number of occasions. Whereas Wilds pled responsible to accent after the very fact, he served no time. Wilds is a free man who now lives in California.

Feb. 28, 1999: Syed was arrested and charged with first-degree homicide.

Advertisement

December 1999: Syed’s first trial began however resulted in a mistrial after three days. Jurors on the case overheard a sidebar between Syed’s protection legal professional – Cristina Gutierrez – and the decide. In response to experiences, Gutierrez interpreted a press release by the decide as tantamount to accusing her of mendacity. After studying the jury had overheard this dialogue, the decide granted Gutierrez’s movement for a mistrial.

January 2000: Syed’s second trial began and continued for six weeks.

Feb. 25, 2000: The jury discovered Syed responsible of first-degree homicide, kidnapping, false imprisonment and theft. He was sentenced to life in jail plus 30 years. Syed’s household, that day, fired his protection legal professional.

March 19, 2003: Syed unsuccessfully appealed his conviction.

Could 28, 2010: Syed made an attraction for post-conviction aid in 2010 primarily based on ineffective help of counsel primarily based on his protection legal professional Cristina Gutierrez’s failure to research an alibi witness, Asia McClain, who maintained she was speaking with Syed within the library on the precise time that prosecutors stated Syed attacked Lee in a Greatest Purchase car parking zone a number of miles away.

Advertisement

The decide dominated that Gutierrez’s determination to not name McClain as a witness was a part of her protection technique reasonably than an act of incompetence. The decide stated the letters McClain despatched Syed in jail have been weak and presumably damaging proof for the protection, since they didn’t state the time she noticed him on the library and contradicted Syed’s personal account from that day.”

The attraction was in the end denied.

Oct. 3 to Dec. 18, 2014: Syed’s case, and the homicide of Lee, prompted the first season of the favored “Serial” podcast. That podcast was downloaded greater than 100 million occasions earlier than June 2016. Episodes raised new questions in regards to the homicide conviction.

Feb. 6, 2015: The Maryland Courtroom of Particular Appeals accredited Syed’s utility for permission to attraction for a possible listening to on the admissibility of the alibi testimony of Asia McClain.

Feb. 9, 2015: Syed’s household spoke out on the “Serial” podcast after the Maryland Courtroom of Particular Appeals determined to assessment the homicide conviction. His household informed Syed over the telephone.

Advertisement

“My brother did not consider my mother, so after I grabbed the telephone and I informed him, he was so completely satisfied. He was simply laughing,” stated Syed’s brother, Yusaf Syed.

Could 18, 2015: The Maryland Courtroom of Particular Appeals gave the case to the Circuit Courtroom for Baltimore Metropolis. Syed’s lawyer, C. Justin Brown, filed a movement on Aug. 24, 2015, saying {that a} newly recovered doc confirmed that the cell tower proof utilized by prosecutors was deceptive and shouldn’t have been admitted at trial. Prosecutors beforehand stated that two different suspects arose within the case, although their names haven’t been launched.

Nov. 6, 2015: A Baltimore Metropolis decide ordered that Syed’s post-conviction aid proceedings, to find out his eligibility for a brand new trial, can be re-opened, in keeping with courtroom data. 

Early February, 2016: The post-conviction aid listening to lasted 5 days. Asia McClain testified that she talked to Syed on the library on Jan. 13, 1999, the day Lee was reported lacking,” courtroom data present.

June 30, 2016: In response to courtroom data, Syed’s request for a brand new trial was granted and his conviction was vacated, ruling that his preliminary protection legal professional, Cristina Gutierrez, “rendered ineffective help when she didn’t cross-examine the state’s professional concerning the reliability of cell tower location proof.”

Advertisement

Syed’s bail was nonetheless denied.

March 29, 2018: In response to courtroom data, the Maryland Courtroom of Particular Appeals upheld Syed’s request for a brand new trial. The Courtroom of Particular Appeals’ stated that Syed’s counsel didn’t contact a possible alibi witness who may “have raised an affordable doubt within the thoughts of at the least one juror.”

Prosecutors and Legal professional Common Brian Frosh argued to reverse the decrease courtroom’s ruling, and stated that “Syed’s protection legal professional did an intensive job and the witness, Asia McClain, wouldn’t have modified the result of the case.”

The prosecution appealed to the Maryland Courtroom of Appeals, the best courtroom within the state. 

March 8, 2019: In a break up 4–3 ruling, the Courtroom of Appeals reversed the findings of the decrease courts, denying Syed’s request for a brand new trial, courtroom data present.

Advertisement

Whereas the courtroom agreed Syed’s authorized counsel was poor, they discovered it was not sufficient to have swayed the jury to alter their determination as a result of the proof in opposition to him was so robust. 

March 10, 2019: HBO premiered a mini-documentary sequence “The Case Towards Adnan Syed.” 

In manufacturing since 2015, “The Case Towards Adnan Syed” re-examined Hae Min Lee’s disappearance, from her relationship with Syed as much as present-day, as Syed pushed for a brand new trial.  

Nov. 25, 2019: The U.S. Supreme Courtroom rejected Syed’s attraction for a brand new trial.

March 10, 2022: Baltimore Metropolis prosecutors agreed to new DNA testing that Syed’s legal professionals believed may clear his title.

Advertisement

Prosecutors agreed to DNA exams on garments, hair and different proof. These exams are way more refined than something out there on the time of Syed’s first trial.  

“To be sincere, not one of the proof listed within the petition has ever been examined, not even the rape package,” Syed’s good friend and creator Rabia Chaudry stated. “You do not truly must have the killer’s blood or semen. Something he touched may need his DNA.”

On the “Serial” podcast, Syed stated, “Nobody has been in a position to present any shred of proof that I had something however friendship in direction of her, like love and respect for her. I had no motive to kill her.”  

Sept. 14, 2022:  Baltimore prosecutors filed a movement to vacate Syed’s homicide conviction.

Baltimore Metropolis State’s Legal professional Marilyn Mosby stated Wednesday her workplace is looking for a brand new trial after a nearly-year lengthy investigation revealed two new potential suspects.

Advertisement

Sept. 19, 2022: Syed was launched from jail after his homicide conviction was vacated by a decide. This got here after the 41-year-old served greater than 23 years in jail.

Within the courtroom, officers eliminated the shackles to a cheer. At the moment, prosecutors didn’t fully dismiss the case.  

Sept. 20, 2022: Baltimore Metropolis State’s Legal professional stated that if DNA doesn’t match Syed, she was going to drop the fees.

She then criticized Frosh and investigators for his or her dealing with of the case.

“Why did they sit on this data? Why wasn’t this disclosed? Why wasn’t it found?” Mosby stated to Hellgren. “As a result of the second that we found it, we turned it over. These are questions you ought to be asking the legal professional common.”

Advertisement

Prosecutors admit cellphone proof was unreliable and a few witnesses testimony was not credible—together with that of Jay Wilds who stated Syed confessed to the homicide and he helped bury Lee.  

Frosh disputed that and issued a press release crucial of Mosby’s claims and saying there have been “critical issues” with the movement to vacate Syed’s conviction. 

Sept. 28, 2022: The household of Hae Min Lee filed a discover of attraction in an tried to reverse a Maryland decide’s determination to vacate the homicide conviction of  Syed.

Oct. 7, 2022: The Maryland Legal professional Common’s Workplace joined Lee’s household in calling for a pause to circuit courtroom proceedings for Adnan Syed.

Oct. 11, 2022: Prosecutors dropped the fees of Adnan Syed. He was cleared after DNA outcomes cleared Syed.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Colombia halts coal exports to Israel in protest against war in Gaza

Published

on

Colombia halts coal exports to Israel in protest against war in Gaza

Stay informed with free updates

Colombia is suspending exports of coal to Israel in protest over the war in Gaza, the South American country’s president announced on Saturday.

“We are going to suspend coal exports to Israel until the genocide stops,” president Gustavo Petro posted on X.

Petro shared a draft decree issued by the ministry of trade which stated that exports will only be resumed once Israel complies with orders from the International Court of Justice last month to halt its military offensive in Rafah.

Advertisement

The trade ministry said the ban will come into effect five days after publication in the country’s official gazette. Shipments to Israel that have already been approved will not be affected.

Colombia is Israel’s largest supplier of coal, according to the American Journal for Transportation. Coal exports to Israel were worth $320mn in the first eight months of last year, according to government data, while Colombia’s leading mining agency reports that taxes, royalties and other payments related to coal exports to Israel are worth around $165mn per year to the treasury.

Colombia’s announcement of trade sanctions on Israel follows a broader move by Turkey, which last month halted trade with the Jewish state until it allows an “uninterrupted and sufficient flow” of humanitarian aid to Gaza. Last Sunday, the Maldives announced a ban on Israeli tourists in solidarity with Gaza.

Despite long historical ties and collaboration on defence between the two countries, Petro — Colombia’s first leftist president — has been one of the most vocal critics on the world stage of Israel’s conduct in Gaza following the attack by Hamas on October 7. 

In May, after breaking diplomatic ties with Israel, Petro traded barbs with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who called the Colombian president an “antisemitic supporter of Hamas”.

Advertisement

Petro, a leftist former guerrilla member who took office in August 2022, has also requested that Colombia join South Africa’s case against Israel for genocide at the International Court of Justice.

The spat between Colombia and Israel breaks with decades of warm relations. Israel is a major supplier of weapons to Colombia, which are used by the Colombian military to fight drug traffickers and insurgent groups.

In 2020, during the tenure of Petro’s rightwing predecessor Iván Duque, a free trade agreement between the two countries came into effect. Petro in February suspended new Israeli weapons purchases.

Colombia’s mining association ACM warned on Thursday that suspending coal exports to Israel would hurt Colombia’s economy. “This decision would not comply with international commitments by Colombia that should be respected and puts at risk the confidence of markets and foreign investment,” ACM said in a statement.

Petro has also sought to position Colombia as a global leader on climate change, pledging to wean the country off fossil fuels despite oil and coal products together making up over half of exports. 

Advertisement

A tax reform passed in late 2022 prohibited extractive companies from deducting royalties from their taxable income, though the constitutional court ruled that provision illegal in November last year.

Speaking at a banking conference on Friday night, Petro said that the court’s decision was the reason for a recent shortfall in government tax take, necessitating spending cuts.

Sergio Guzmán, director of Bogotá-based consultancy Colombia Risk Analysis, said that the decision to suspend coal exports to Israel was “shortsighted” as the global market for the fossil fuel continues to dwindle amid a transition to greener energy sources.

“Petro is making a grandiose geopolitical move that is poised to hurt Colombia potentially more financially than Israel, the target of the action,” Guzmán said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

A Michigan man went viral for driving with a suspended license. But he never had one

Published

on

A Michigan man went viral for driving with a suspended license. But he never had one

Corey Harris went viral for driving his car during a virtual court appearance. It turns out, he was never eligible to drive in the first place.

Video courtesy Honorable Judge Cedric Simpson/Screenshot by NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Video courtesy Honorable Judge Cedric Simpson/Screenshot by NPR

A Michigan man who went viral for unlawfully driving during a virtual court meeting in May never actually had a driver’s license, adding a new twist to the bizarre story.

Corey Harris, 44, was arrested last month for driving under suspended driving privileges, according to Michigan’s Department of State, in a recorded moment that quickly spread across social media.

“Mr. Harris, are you driving?” a visibly amused Judge Cedric Simpson asks Harris on the May 15 video.

Advertisement

“Actually, I’m pulling into my doctor’s office actually, so just give me a second,” Harris confirms.

The judge says in the video that the charge for which Harris was to appear was regarding driving with a suspended license and then orders Harris to turn himself in to the Washtenaw County jail that same day.

Harris’ stunned face quickly sparked memes across social media and artist renderings of him went viral.

But since that incident made national headlines, the story has taken several turns. Following Harris’ arrest and two-day stint in jail, it was reported that his license was actually supposed to have been reinstated more than two years prior and that a clerical error was responsible for the embarrassing incident.

That, however, is not the case, Angela Benander, director of communications for the Michigan Department of State told NPR.

Advertisement

“This isn’t a clerical error. This is a failure of action,” she said.

In a new hearing this week, Judge Simpson makes clear that Harris never actually had an eligible driver’s license. And records from Michigan’s Department of State, obtained by NPR, show this as well.

In Harris’ case, it was his driving privileges that were suspended, not his license, Benander explained.

When he was eligible to have those privileges reinstated, and eventually secure a license, Benander said Harris did not follow the proper steps to make that happen.

“You can have a secretary of state driver’s record without ever having an official driver’s license. And that’s usually because, when you receive a suspension of driving privileges, we will create a record and then list it as suspended,” Benander explained.

Advertisement

“So, in this case, there was a record; it was suspended status. That doesn’t mean that he had a license, which it turns out he did not ever have a valid driver’s license,” she said.

Harris was ordered back into police custody following this week’s hearing and bailed out by his wife the same day, his attorney, Dionne Webster-Cox said.

“He just wants to be a law-abiding citizen. He wants to be. But bless his heart,” Webster-Cox said.

She said Harris is working to get his driver’s permit now and her office is dedicated to helping him getting properly registered to drive again.

“There’s just something about him. It’s that kind of, like, lovable goofball,” Webster-Cox said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Israel rescues four hostages in Gaza

Published

on

Israel rescues four hostages in Gaza

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Israel’s military freed four hostages held by Hamas in Gaza on Saturday after an operation in Nuseirat in the centre of the enclave.

The rescue of one woman and three men — Noa Argamani, Almog Meir Jan, Andrey Kozlov and Shlomi Ziv — brings the number of hostages brought back alive by Israel’s military to seven and is the largest rescue operation since the start of the war against Hamas.

The four were kidnapped from the Nova music festival in southern Israel during Hamas’s October 7 attack, in which militants killed 1,200 people, according to Israeli officials, and took about 250 hostage.

Advertisement

Roughly half of the hostages were released during a truce last year in exchange for Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails.

Yoav Gallant, Israel’s defence minister, hailed the rescue and said Israel would “keep fighting” until the 120 hostages still held by Hamas in Gaza — 43 of whom are thought to have died — were brought home.

The Hostages Families Forum Headquarters, which represents relatives of the captives, welcomed the rescue as a “miraculous triumph”, and urged the government to “remember its commitment” to bring back all the hostages — “the living for rehabilitation, the murdered for burial”.

Health officials in Gaza said that the fighting in Nuseirat had caused “many” fatalities and injuries. A spokesman for Al Aqsa hospital in Deir Al Balah in central Gaza, said that so far 55 bodies and dozens of injured people had been brought to the hospital, and that “many” more were expected.

In the wake of the rescue operation, Benny Gantz, the former general and opposition politician who joined Netanayhu’s coalition in the wake of Hamas’s October 7 attack, cancelled an address scheduled for this evening. He had been widely expected to announce his departure from the government.

Advertisement

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu released a recording of himself speaking to Argamani after her rescue.

The spokesman for Israel’s military, Daniel Hagari, said the hostages had been rescued from two locations in Nuseirat by special forces in an operation at around 11am local time. All four were “alive and well” and would undergo medical checks in Israel.

The rescue comes as Israel is under mounting international pressure over the soaring civilian toll of its offensive in Gaza, which has killed more than 36,500 people, according to Palestinian officials, as well as stoking a humanitarian catastrophe.

Last month, the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court sought arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant over the war, while the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to “immediately halt” its offensive in Rafah and allow more aid into Gaza.

On Friday it emerged that the UN had added the Israeli military to a list of countries and organisations that fail to protect children in conflict.

Advertisement

The news sparked a furious response in Israel, with its ambassador to the UN, Gilad Erdan — who published a recording of himself receiving the news — describing the decision as “shameful”.

The Palestinian Authority welcomed the decision, saying “accountability is overdue”.

Continue Reading

Trending