Connect with us

Wisconsin

Wisconsin is now involved in 16 lawsuits against the Trump administration

Published

on

Wisconsin is now involved in 16 lawsuits against the Trump administration


Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul has joined his 16th lawsuit against the Trump administration.

The most recent legal challenge the state signed onto focuses on cuts to congressionally approved federal funding for electric vehicle infrastructure.

“Congress set up a program to fund electric vehicle infrastructure around the country,” Kaul said Thursday on WPR’s “Wisconsin Today.” “Here in Wisconsin, we are in line to receive over $60 million in funds to support electric vehicle infrastructure. And whether or not President Trump agrees with that policy, it’s the law of the land.” 

“His administration has said that they’re not going to award the funds that were passed in the law by Congress and signed to the law by President Biden, and that’s just not how our system of government works,” Kaul added. “The president’s job is to faithfully execute the laws, and what we have Donald Trump here doing instead is disregarding those laws and attempting to, by fiat essentially, ignore them. And that is just not how our system of government works. We have a constitutional republic, and he’s ignoring that.”

Advertisement

Stay informed on the latest news

Sign up for WPR’s email newsletter.

In addition, just before the electric vehicle infrastructure lawsuit was filed, Kaul joined 19 other attorneys general in a lawsuit accusing Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. of dismantling the Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS. This comes in addition to the April lawsuit regarding the termination of federal grants for HHS. 

Kaul said in a statement that the HHS cuts “threaten Wisconsin efforts to remove lead in Milwaukee schools, reduce maternal deaths and prevent youth tobacco use.” 

Advertisement

This is now the fourth suit that we have specifically relating to actions by the Department of Health and Human Services,” Kaul said on “Wisconsin Today.” “What’s going on is deeply concerning.” 

Wisconsin is also part of lawsuits pertaining to the dismantling of AmeriCorps, a threat to withhold funding from state and local education agencies, a cap on research grant funding, and a lawsuit over the president’s executive order that seeks to change national election law. The number of similar cases the state is involved in has more than doubled since March.

On Friday, Wisconsin joined other states in a lawsuit about the Trump administration’s efforts to fast-track energy-related projects.

Kaul joined “Wisconsin Today” to discuss the state’s multiple legal challenges against the Trump administration.

The following was edited for clarity and brevity.

Advertisement

Rob Ferrett: A key part of the lawsuit for state attorneys general is showing that the case in question violates federal laws in ways that do harm here in their states. Can you spell out a little about what this means for Wisconsin? 

Josh Kaul: There are two things that I consider when I decide whether to get Wisconsin involved in a multi-state suit like this. One is: “Is there a policy that is harmful to Wisconsinites?” Secondly: “Do we have a strong legal basis for bringing a suit?”

Something we’ve really seen throughout these lawsuits is not just the Trump administration making bad policy decisions, but really flouting the laws and ignoring them — treating acts of Congress that were passed by Congress and signed into law by a president not as something that they are required to uphold, but as something they can ignore. And that’s part of the reason we had some success, and it’s the basis for a number of the suits we’ve been filing.

RF: Another suit that you joined challenges funding cuts to the Institute of Museum and Library Services, the Minority Business Development Agency and the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. This week, a preliminary injunction was issued. What does this injunction mean at this point? 

JK: A preliminary injunction is an order that blocks, in this case, the Trump administration from moving forward with what it’s trying to do. So this is a significant win for us. As you indicated, it’s preliminary. This isn’t the final ruling in the case, but …  the Trump administration is blocked from effectively dismantling these three services. There are three of them here that are at issue. 

Advertisement

And I want to highlight, in this case, some of what’s going on with these reckless DOGE-inspired cuts because the Institute of Museum and Library Services helps to fund libraries and museums in communities across the country. And libraries, of course, can be critical institutions in communities all over Wisconsin and all over the country … And so slashing them to save a few dollars that can go toward a tax cut for some of the richest people in the country, while that may seem like a good idea to Elon Musk, it’s leaving communities behind, and that’s a theme that we’re seeing throughout these attacks on our government from the Trump administration. So that’s part of the reason we’ve taken action here. And so far, we’ve received the favorable ruling on the preliminary injunction. And again, I’m hopeful that we will be successful in this case because these are agencies that were created by Congress and the president can’t unilaterally dismantle them. 

RF: We’ve seen instances where, after a federal judge rules against the Trump administration, Republican members of Congress have called for impeachment or funding cuts to the particular courts they’re in. Just talk so far, no serious action taken that I’ve seen. But are you concerned about that response and that threat to judges who don’t rule in the review of those members of Congress in the right way?

JK: Absolutely, this is fundamental to our system of government. … And it’s important to note here that the judges who have been ruling against the Trump administration, some have been appointed by Democratic presidents, but some have been appointed by Republican presidents, even some appointed by Donald Trump himself. And so this is happening with judges appointed by both political parties. And Congress’ response so far has been incredibly disappointing. 

It’s often Congress’ authority that the president is infringing on here. These are laws, in some cases, that Congress passed, and Donald Trump is ignoring those laws. It’s critical that branch of government step up and stand up for the rule of law, including the separation of powers, rather than trying to further this effort by attacking a coequal branch. And when the founders of this country created our system of government, they created these co equal branches to preserve our liberty — to protect it. And some of the most eloquent decisions on these issues come from conservative judges and justices. And so to see Republicans in Congress abandoning that idea to line up behind Donald Trump is disappointing, and I hope we will see a change in approaches as we move forward.

Editor’s note: This article was updated on Friday, May 9 to reflect Wisconsin had joined a 16th lawsuit against the Trump administration.

Advertisement



Source link

Wisconsin

How tariffs are affecting Wisconsin’s real and artificial Christmas trees

Published

on

How tariffs are affecting Wisconsin’s real and artificial Christmas trees


Nearly all artificial Christmas trees in the world today are made in China. And with that comes an up to 30 percent tariff rate on imported Christmas products — including artificial trees. 

Kris Reisdorf is co-president of the Racine- and Sturtevant-based home and garden store Milaeger’s. On WPR’s “Wisconsin Today,” Reisdorf said tariffs are affecting their prices on artificial trees, but she’s mitigating most of the rate hike through negotiations with manufacturers and by taking on lower profit margins herself. 

“We are doing our fair share in making Christmas affordable,” Reisdorf said. “When the average person is thinking 30 percent (tariffs), that’s not by any means what they’re really paying.”

News with a little more humanity

WPR’s “Wisconsin Today” newsletter keeps you connected to the state you love without feeling overwhelmed. No paywall. No agenda. No corporate filter.

Advertisement

Milaeger’s “almost real” trees range from under $100 to well over $3,000. Reisdorff said she’s raised prices for all artificial trees by only around $20 compared to last year.

Residorf said tree sales are largely stable despite the uptick in tariff pricing.

An ABC News/Washington Post poll last year found that 58 percent of Americans were buying artificial trees instead of real ones. That’s up from 40 percent in 2010. 

Advertisement

Greg Hann owns Hann’s Christmas Farm in Oregon. Hann also sits on the Wisconsin Christmas Tree Producers Association Board and is president-elect of the National Christmas Tree Association. 

Hann told “Wisconsin Today” the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 created a surge in business for real evergreen trees and that demand has been holding relatively steady ever since. That said, Hann acknowledged real Christmas tree sales are up for him and fellow growers this year. He attributed the increase in sales to the tariffs and the fact that farmers’ supplies are finally catching up to the higher demand brought on by COVID-19. Nearly all real trees come from the United States or Canada, according to Hann. 

Hann said a recent survey by the National Christmas Tree Association found 84 percent of Christmas tree growers nationwide have kept prices the same over the last two years, and that includes his own farm. Being grown locally in Wisconsin, Hann said his business is largely unaffected by tariffs.

“It’s kind of nice to have a good supply with a stable price in this economy,” he said. 

Reisdorf said that some artificial tree manufacturers are moving operations outside of China to places like Cambodia. But most other countries in the east are also facing tariff threats. 

Advertisement

Instead, Reisdorf said artificial tree importers are lobbying President Donald Trump to lower his 30 percent tariffs on Christmas products like trees and ornaments, because those kinds of goods aren’t coming back to be made in the U.S.

Meanwhile, Hann said his organization is lobbying to have tariffs on artificial trees increased to 300 percent. He said the added tariff costs help create an “even playing field” between real and artificial trees, since farmers have to pay farm staff and cover fertilizer costs. 

But it isn’t always about the cost. Reisdorf said artificial trees have the benefit of lasting “forever,” essentially.

Hann said many of his customers come to the farm looking to keep up the Christmas tradition of picking out their own family tree. 

“They’re looking for that fragrance of a real tree,” he said. “They want to start that tradition of the family together. They pick the tree, they take it into their house.” 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin loses starting offensive lineman to the transfer portal

Published

on

Wisconsin loses starting offensive lineman to the transfer portal


In a bit of a surprise, Wisconsin Badgers starting center Jake Renfro is using a medical hardship year and entering the transfer portal for his final season of eligibility.

Renfro, a sixth-year senior in 2024, battled numerous injuries this season, limiting him to only four games after having season-ending surgery. He was a full-time starter for Wisconsin in 2024 after missing the entire 2023 season except for the team’s bowl game due to injury.

Prior to his time at Wisconsin, Renfro had played for head coach Luke Fickell at Cincinnati for three seasons. He played in seven games as a freshman in 2020, making six starts at center. He then was the full-time starter as a sophomore in 2021, earning All-AAC honors before missing the entire 2022 season due to injury.

Now, he’s set to come back to college football for a seventh year, rather than turn pro, and will look to do so at another school.

Advertisement

“I want to thank Coach Fickell, the entire coaching and training staff, my teammates, and the University of Wisconsin for everything over the past three seasons,” Renfro wrote. “I am grateful for the support, development, friendships, and memories I have made during my time in Madison. After much prayer and consideration, I have decided to enter the transfer portal and use a medical hardship year to continue my college football journey. I will always appreciate my time as a Badger.”

Renfro was one of the biggest supporters of Fickell publicly, being a vocal leader on the team as the starting center.

With his departure, Wisconsin could need a new starting left tackle, left guard, and center next season, depending on whether Joe Brunner heads to the NFL or returns for another season.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin’s match vs Stanford puts Alicia Andrew across net from sister

Published

on

Wisconsin’s match vs Stanford puts Alicia Andrew across net from sister


play

  • Sisters Alicia and Lizzy Andrew will face each other in the NCAA volleyball tournament regional semifinals.
  • Alicia is a redshirt senior middle blocker for Wisconsin, while Lizzy is a sophomore middle blocker for Stanford.
  • Alicia and Lizzy Andrew have similarities on and off the court as they each contribute to college volleyball powerhouses.

MADISON — It did not take long for Alicia Andrew to text her younger sister after watching the NCAA volleyball selection show with her Wisconsin teammates in a lounge area in the south end zone of Camp Randall Stadium.

“I was like, ‘Girl!’” Andrew said. “She’s like, ‘I know! I’ll see you in Texas! And I was like, ‘I’m so excited!’”

Advertisement

Andrew will not see her younger sister in the Gregory Gym stands like any other family members, but rather on the court as an opposing player in the Badgers’ NCAA tournament regional semifinal match against Stanford.

Alicia Andrew is a 6-foot-3 redshirt senior middle blocker for Wisconsin. Lizzy Andrew is a 6-foot-5 sophomore middle blocker for Stanford. The sisters will play against each other for the first time with a spot in the NCAA regional finals on the line.

“Certainly when you’re having two high-level Division I starters on teams that are top five, top 10 in the country playing the same position, that’s pretty unique,” Wisconsin coach Kelly Sheffield said. “They’re both talented and competitive. But I also know that the players aren’t going to make it about themselves or the person that’s on the other side of the net. They’re parts of teams that are trying to move on and move forward and play great volley.”

Alicia has naturally fielded questions about the sibling rivalry, but she is “not reading too much into rivalry stuff and just playing this sport.”

Advertisement

“It’s another game,” she said after a recent UW practice. “Yes, it’s her across the net. But it’s a business. We both want to move on to the next round.”

Both players have played key parts in their respective teams’ path to this stage.

Alicia, after transferring from Baylor, is the only UW player to appear in all 98 sets this season and one of five to appear in all 30 matches. She is second on the team with 111 blocks, barely trailing fellow middle blocker Carter Booth’s 119.

“Really wants to be good for the people around her,” Sheffield said of Alicia. “Wants to do her job. Takes pride in her job. There’s a maturity, but yet there’s a playfulness that is a really good balance for her. Love coaching her. She’s wired the right way. She really is.”

Advertisement

Lizzy, meanwhile, ranks seventh in the country with a .441 hitting percentage in 2025 after earning a spot on the all-ACC freshman team in 2024. She also has experience playing with the U.S. U21 national team.

“I’m so proud of how hard she worked and her journey to Stanford,” Alicia said. “She puts in so much work, and she just loves the sport of volleyball. And I have loved watching her grow. It’s been fun to see her get better and better every year. And this past season, she’s been playing lights out.”

That pride has turned Alicia into a frequent viewer of ACC volleyball, of course whenever it has not conflicted with the Badgers’ own matches.

“We try to watch as many of each other’s games as we can, and I always just love watching her play,” she said. “I’m so proud of her. She’s just worked her tail off at Stanford, so to see her excel has been so fun.”

The Andrew sisters — Alicia, Lizzy and Natalie, who is on the rowing team at the U.S. Naval Academy — competed together in high school. (They also have a younger brother, William.) Competing against each other is a new concept for them, though.

Advertisement

“We’re not huge trash talkers, neither one of us,” Alicia said. “So I think that she’s going to play her game. I’m going to play my game. We’re going to have our heads down. There might be some looking across and smiling because we make the exact same expressions and quirky faces and reactions.”

The sisters don’t look the same – Lizzy has blonde hair and Alicia has brown hair. But Alicia quickly sees the resemblance with those on-court mannerisms.

“If there’s a silly play or if there is like a really unexpected dump or something, she’ll turn around and make the exact same face that I will,” Alicia said. “And it’s funny watching her on TV because I’m like, ‘Wow, that looks scary familiar.’”

Advertisement

They have some similarities off the court, too.

“We’re just goobers,” Alicia said. “We just like to have a good time together. Obviously she’s my little sister, but we have always been a close family — like all the siblings — so I feel like we’ve done all the things together growing up in all the sports.”

The Andrew parents are perhaps the biggest winners of the NCAA tournament bracket.

“My parents were super excited,” Alicia said. “They don’t have to split the travel plan, so they can save some frequent flyer miles there and both be in Texas. … They’re always trying to coordinate all the schedules.”

The Andrew family made T-shirts for the unique sisterly matchup. (Alicia thinks she is getting one considering they asked her and Lizzy for their shirt sizes in the family group chat.) The shirts are black, too, so there is no favoritism between Wisconsin and Stanford’s variations of cardinal red.

Advertisement

“They have a Stanford ‘S’ and a tree on it and then a Wisconsin ‘W’ and a little Badger on it, too,” Andrew said. “They’re really excited about these shirts. They’re being non-biased; they’re repping both daughters.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending