Wisconsin
Wisconsin football: Three questions for Week 3 vs. New Mexico State
Following a setback final week versus Washington State, the Wisconsin Badgers need to get again on monitor this Saturday towards the New Mexico State Aggies.
Wisconsin is a heavy favourite once more this weekend, and the Badgers are hoping to make use of the competition as a confidence builder with Ohio State looming on the schedule for Week 4.
With that in thoughts, here’s a have a look at three key questions for Wisconsin’s matchup with New Mexico State.
Can the Badgers clear up the penalties on offense?
One of many major storylines that emerged from final week’s loss to Washington State was the variety of vital penalties Wisconsin had.
General, the Badgers had 11 complete penalties for over 100 yards. Much more obtrusive, the offense was the responsible get together on 9 penalties, with six by the offensive line alone.
The penalties constantly wiped away massive performs for Wisconsin and had been one of many key causes the Badgers had been unable to transform over 400 yards of offense into greater than 14 factors.
After every week of apply and a concentrate on remedying the difficulty, it will likely be fascinating to see if Wisconsin can put collectively a comparatively clear recreation.
New Mexico State is among the lower-tier groups within the FBS, that means that is the kind of contest the place Wisconsin would want to make a number of errors to finally lose the sport. With harder opponents upcoming, taking part in a much less sloppy recreation would go a great distance in serving to the crew transfer on from the Washington State loss and assist construct higher habits for the long run.
What’s going to the kicking recreation appear to be this weekend?
Up so far, Arkansas switch Vito Calvaruso has dealt with all the sector aim kicks, whereas Jack Van Dyke has been the kickoff specialist.
Nevertheless, after final weekend, it will likely be fascinating to see how the Badgers method the kicking recreation.
Calvaruso missed each of his makes an attempt towards Washington State and neither kick was near correct. After lacking most of fall camp, Wisconsin has a succesful backup in Nate Van Zelst, who was the No. 1 kicker all through many of the spring and fall with Calvaruso out with a quad harm. Van Zelst is only a redshirt freshman and doesn’t have practically as sturdy of a leg as Calvaruso, but when there are continued struggles early towards New Mexico State, Van Zelst might get a chance.
Scroll to Proceed
After shedding a detailed recreation wherein two missed discipline objectives might have been the distinction, the stress is on Calvaruso to kick the ball effectively this Saturday.
Kickoff specialist Jack Van Dyke can be seeking to kick the ball a bit higher this weekend after solely recording one touchback on three kickoffs versus Washington State. The Cougars had a 73-yard return on the opening kickoff of the second half, which performed an enormous position in swinging momentum of their favor. Van Dyke beforehand booted 5-of-7 by means of the top zone towards Illinois State, so he has the leg to drive touchbacks on a extra constant foundation.
General, particular groups should be higher on the entire, however the kicking recreation could be an amazing begin.
Will the offensive line put all of it collectively?
The Wisconsin offense has been well-balanced this yr, with the dashing assault (197.5 yards per recreation) and passing recreation (223 yards per recreation) equally impactful by means of the primary two video games.
Nevertheless, exterior of Braelon Allen’s 96-yard run towards Illinois State, the Wisconsin operating recreation has not been all that sturdy. As an alternative, the passing recreation discovered extra success towards Washington State, because the Cougars packed the field to cease the run.
By means of two video games, if Allen’s lengthy landing run is eliminated, Wisconsin is averaging solely 3.74 yards per rush try, a far cry from what’s historically anticipated in Madison.
Whereas beginning proper deal with Riley Mahlman’s absence probably performs a task within the struggles, the actual fact stays that the offensive line must generate extra push up entrance to get the dashing assault going. Moreover, as acknowledged earlier, the group additionally wants to chop down on penalties and errors.
Towards an inferior opponent, the offensive line ought to come out and push New Mexico State round. The Badgers must get again to a spot the place the offensive line dictates the sport, and this weekend might act as a confidence builder earlier than Massive Ten play kicks off.
Associated hyperlinks:
You may maintain updated on every part at All Badgers by liking + following our Fb web page and Twitter account:
Fb – @AllBadgers
Twitter – @All_Badgers
You too can observe Web site Writer Matt Belz at @savedbythebelz on Twitter.
Wisconsin
WR Trech Kekahuna Talks Leaving UW, Felt Underappreciated By The Staff
MADISON, Wis. – Trech Kekahuna’s ears perked up when the University of Wisconsin sold him on the Air Raid. Once excited about developing into the Badgers’ top receiver in a pro-style offense, the former four-star prospect dreamt about the possibilities he could achieve in UW’s aerial attack with his ability as a pass catcher and natural speed to generate yards after the catch. That didn’t turn out to be the case.
“I just didn’t like how things were going,” Kekahuna told BadgerBlitz.com. “I wanted to try something new.”
Wisconsin
Here is the 2025 recruiting class that has signed with Wisconsin football
Wisconsin football coach Luke Fickell says season took toll on players
The Badgers football coach met with reporters following their 24-7 loss to Minnesota Friday at Camp Randall Stadium in Madison.
MADISON – Wednesday, Dec. 4, is the first day of the early signing period for college football. Here are 24 players who signed with Wisconsin on Wednesday morning. The early signing period ends Friday, Dec. 6.
Hometown: Charlotte, North Carolina.
Height: 6-1. Weight: 180.
Carter Smith, quarterback
Hometown: Fort Myers, Florida.
Height: 6-3. Weight: 185.
Jaylen Williams, defensive lineman
Hometown: Palatine, Illinois.
Height: 6-6. Weight: 250
Emmett Bork, tight end
Hometown: Oconomowoc, Wisconsin.
Height: 6-6. Weight: 245.
Drayden Pavey, defensive tackle
Hometown: Cincinnati, Ohio
Height: 6-3. Weight: 294.
Xavier Ukponu, defensive tackle
Hometown: Denton, Texas.
Height: 6-3. Weight: 300.
Hardy Watts, offensive lineman
Hometown: Brookline, Massachusetts.
Height: 6-5. Weight: 305.
Nicolas Clayton, defensive end
Hometown: Gainesville, Florida.
Height: 6-5. Weight: 215.
Eugene Hilton Jr., receiver
Hometown: Zionsville, Indiana.
Height: 6-1. Weight: 175.
Mason Posa, inside linebacker
Hometown: Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Height: 6-3. Weight: 210.
Torin Pettaway, defensive lineman
Hometown: Middleton, Wisconsin.
Height: 6-5. Weight: 285.
Nizyi Davis, tight end
Hometown: Indianapolis.
Height: 6-6. Weight: 210.
Jahmare Washington, defensive back
Hometown: Chicago.
Height: 6-2. Weight: 170.
Nolan Davenport, offensive lineman
Hometown: Massillon, Ohio.
Height: 6-6. Weight: 280.
Logan Powell, offensive lineman
Hometown: Phoenix.
Height: 6-5. Weight: 290.
Luke Emmerich, safety
Hometown: Monticello, Minnesota.
Height: 6-1. Weight: 195.
Cam Clark, offensive lineman
Hometown: Dexter, Michigan.
Height: 6-7. Weight: 290.
Grant Dean, safety
Hometown: Neenah, Wisconsin.
Height: 6-1. Weight: 190.
Sam Lateju, outside linebacker
Hometown: Lagos, Nigeria.
Height: 6-5. Weight: 230.
Jaimier Scott, defensive back
Hometown: Cincinnati.
Height: 6-1. Weight: 179.
Cooper Catalano, inside linebacker
Hometown: Germantown, Wisconsin.
Height: 6-2. Weight: 215.
Michael Roeske, offensive lineman
Hometown: Wautoma, Wisconsin.
Height: 6-8. Weight: 295.
Remington Moss, defensive back
Hometown: Fredericksburg, Virginia.
Height: 6-3. Weight: 192.
Landyn Locke, quarterback
Hometown: Rockwall, Texas.
Height: 6-4. Weight: 185.
Wisconsin
Takeaways from No.11 Wisconsin's 67-64 Loss to Michigan
Takeaways from No.11 Wisconsin’s 67-64 Loss to Michigan
MADISON, Wis. – Michigan 7-footers Vlad Goldin and Danny Wolf were working on creating a nickname for their tandem, a partnership that could potentially cause matchup nightmares throughout the Big Ten schedule.
Here’s one they can workshop – Badger Bashers.
Goldin and Wolf controlled the low post, picked apart Wisconsin’s defensive mistakes, and made Wisconsin center Steven Crowl a non-factor in a 67-64 victory at the Kohl Center.
It was a disappointing setback for the Badgers (8-1, 0-1 Big Ten), which shut down Michigan guards but struggled to hit open shots consistently against the Wolverines’ top-10-rated defense. It doesn’t get any easier for the Badgers considering No.5 Marquette has a defense that is rated five spots better than the Wolverines.
“I think we’re going to respond great,” guard John Blackwell said. “We have a great group of vets who have been through this. You’re not going to win every game. We’re going to be just fine. We’re going to build off this loss, take it on the chin, and keep moving forward.”
Here are my takeaways from the Kohl Center.
Goldin and Wolf were superior to Crowl and Winter
In a battle of teams with 7-foot frontcourts, it was no contest.
Wolf is described as a 7-foot point guard because of how he handles basketball. Goldin is all muscle in the low post. Together, they pummeled Wisconsin relentlessly in the second half once Crowl got into foul trouble and created a mismatch problem.
Wolf was active early with nine points, six rebounds, and five blocks. Goldin struggled around the rim in going 2-for-7. Both players exploited UW’s interior with Wolf going 4-for-6 with five assists and Goldin going 7-for-9, mostly on dunks at the rim. The duo scored 28 of Michigan’s 41 second-half points and 44 of its 67, as Crowl and Winter got lost guarding the pick-and-roll or not creating enough resistance on the player rolling toward the basket.
That was evident late as Goldin got behind Wisconsin’s defense for easy baskets at the rim to allow Michigan to answer UW’s offense and take control over the final three minutes.
“We weren’t physical enough,” forward Nolan Winter said. “We weren’t intent on the ball screen with what we were doing. It’s on both of us as bigs. We know it. We know we’ve got to be better, and Steven knows he’s got to be out of foul trouble. We need him out there and the presence he brings us. It’s poor communication.
“They’re two great 7-footers coming off ball screens. They know what they’re doing, but we got to handle that a lot better.”
Crowl and Winter were hoping Tuesday would be their big coming-out party. The end of the first half showed some promise. With John Tonje on the bench because of foul trouble for the final 6:02, Crowl and Winter helped the Badgers go on a 13-6 run entering the half largely by creating and finding space.
Blackwell drew a double team on the low block and split with a bounce pass to Crowl for an easy finish off the glass. Kamari McGee successfully probed the double team as well, drawing Goldin away from the basket to stop dribble penetration before bouncing a pass to Winter. With guard Tre Donaldson late on the switch, Winter had an easy dunk at the rim. With Blackwell leading the break on the next possession, the sophomore attacked the right block, drew the double team, and passed to Winter for another slam.
That allowed Wisconsin to take a six-point lead in the locker room, even though the Badgers shot 32.3 percent in the first half. A lot of those actions were cut off in the second half, as the Badgers went 4-for-14 around the rim and UW’s duo was only 1-for-4 from the floor.
The defensive miscues don’t all fall on the forwards. Wisconsin guards struggled at times guarding rollers and winning individual matchups. The Badgers held Michigan to 6-for-25 from three-point range, but the 18-9 run to start the second half was created by Michigan attacking the paint and converting, wiping out UW’s six-point halftime lead.
“They’re both vets and have been around this for a while,” said Winter, as Michigan shot 61.5 percent in the second half. “Their games really complement each other well. The ball screens created some issues for our defense. They executed really well and they’re both really talented, find one another and finish.”
Blackwell’s Leadership Emerging
Tonje led Wisconsin in scoring for the seventh time with 18 points (12 in the second half), but the senior didn’t play in control as he’s done in many games throughout the season. Blackwell was a different story with 16 points and nine rebounds, including his work creating off the offensive glass
Blackwell had four offensive rebounds through the first seven games of the season and equaled that total against Michigan, including two on a stretch that showed he’s on his way to becoming the future of Wisconsin’s program.
On consecutive second-half possessions, Blackwell boxed out guard Roddy Gayle Jr. on three-point attempts, secured the loose ball, and finished at the rim. When he hit a step-back jumper on the next trip, Blackwell’s 6-0 run gave UW a 47-44 lead.
UW finished with 16 offensive rebounds that led to 12 second-chance points, a big boost for a team that entered the night 291st nationally in offensive rebounding (9.0 per game).
“His ability to gobble up offensive rebounders and finish in there,” head coach Greg Gard said. “He played a lot of minutes. We needed him on the floor. He did a lot of good things in the second half.”
Blackwell didn’t play perfectly, which his season-high five turnovers would indicate. UW was well under the 17.3 turnovers Michigan forced a game, but the 10 UW turnovers led to 13 Michigan points.
Klesmit in A Deep Freeze
Gard vividly remembered how Max Klesmit drove into the lane and made a play in the paint with a turnaround jumper, putting the Badgers up 64-61 with 2:37 remaining. He likely remembers it because it was the last point UW scored or because it was Klesmit’s only second-half field goal.
Klesmit went 3-for-14 from the floor and 1-for-9 from three, numbers that aren’t pretty but better than his second-half stat line of 1-for-9 and 0-for-6.
The senior missed shots on three consecutive possessions that would have tied the game or put Wisconsin ahead. He badly missed one and barely drew iron on another.
“I think they are good shots, honestly,” Blackwell said. “Max, Kamari, JT, keep shooting the ball. They are great looks. They are going to fall sooner. I was fine with our looks. We just got to get back in the gym and get more reps.”
Wisconsin shot a season-worst 18.8 percent (6-for-27) on threes, a lack of perimeter success that prevented the Badgers from spreading the floor. Not spreading Michigan out prevented the Badgers from attacking gaps and getting to the free throw line, where they went 14-for-19 (the third-fewest makes of the season).
Gard thought Wisconsin forced at least one possession down the stretch, but that Klesmit had open looks. Klesmit’s three-point miss with 22 seconds left was originally supposed to be a possession where the Badgers went for two, but Blackwell drew two defenders and kicked the ball out to the senior.
“Max has made those shots before,” Gard said. “He’s in a slump right now. We got to help him get out of it.”
Gard also bemoaned Winter’s missed free throw with UW down three in three seconds left. With the plan to make the first and miss the second, Gard said UW practiced the exact scenario on Monday and executed the drill.
But the bigger worry is Klesmit, who is shooting career-worst overall (32.6 percent) and from three-point range (25.4). Over the last four games, Klesmit is 9-for-39 from the floor (23.1 percent) and 5-for-28 from the perimeter (17.9).
“You got to keep shooting,” Gard said. “Work on it. You can’t be hesitant, can’t be gun shy. You got to keep working stuff in practice, getting extra shots, just got to work your way out of it.”
By The Numbers
21.2 – Michigan’s first-half shooting percentage. The Wolverines finished at 39.0 percent after going 16-for-26 in the second half.
7:42 – Number of minutes the Wolverines went without a field goal to end the first half
3:02 – Longest field goal drought for Michigan in the second half
19 – Fast break points for Michigan, which outscored the Badgers by 15 in transition
5 – Shot attempts by Crowl, only three of which came from two-point range.
3 – Michigan’s winning streak in the series, tied for the longest against the Badgers since 2000.
_________________________________________________
*Chat about this article in The Badgers’ Den
*Check out our videos, interviews, and Q&As on our YouTube channel
*Subscribe and listen to the BadgerBlitz.com podcast (as seen on Apple, Google, Spotify and wherever you listen to podcasts)
*Follow us on Twitter: @McNamaraRivals, @TheBadgerNation, @RaulV45, @seamus_rohrer, @DonnieSlusher_
*Like us on Facebook
-
Science1 week ago
Despite warnings from bird flu experts, it's business as usual in California dairy country
-
Health1 week ago
CheekyMD Offers Needle-Free GLP-1s | Woman's World
-
Technology1 week ago
Lost access? Here’s how to reclaim your Facebook account
-
Entertainment7 days ago
Review: A tense household becomes a metaphor for Iran's divisions in 'The Seed of the Sacred Fig'
-
Technology6 days ago
US agriculture industry tests artificial intelligence: 'A lot of potential'
-
Sports5 days ago
One Black Friday 2024 free-agent deal for every MLB team
-
Technology4 days ago
Elon Musk targets OpenAI’s for-profit transition in a new filing
-
News3 days ago
Rassemblement National’s Jordan Bardella threatens to bring down French government