South Dakota

Does North Dakota support mental health days for students?

Published

2 years ago

July 14, 2024

Does North Dakota support mental health days for students?

BISMARCK, ND (KXNET) — In recent times, the education system has experienced crises on many different ends — ranging from, according to the American Enterprise Institute, 26% of all public school attendees in the US were labeled “chronically absent” (missing at least 10% of the school year, or roughly 18 days of classes) in the last school year, a tremendous jump from the pre-pandemic rate of 15%. This leads some to wonder: what can be done to keep students in class?

In a comprehensive study by Test Prep Insight, 3,000 parents (including representatives from ND), parents were polled on whether or not they believe parents of absentee children should be fined, citing money as a major motivator for many. According to the results, 25% of North Dakotans support the idea of using financial penalties as a way to deter student absences, with an average suggested fine of $22 per day. The 44% who oppose this idea, meanwhile, say that it has the potential to be extremely unfair to parents from poorer backgrounds. The survey respondents continued to note that steps could be taken to help aid students outside of forcing another burden on their parents. 70% say that schools or authorities should provide extra support for those who may be struggling in classes, 20% suggest offering financial incentives for good attendance, and 10% say that additional communication with parents would be helpful.

It should be noted, however, that multiple causes can contribute to chronic absences among students, with mental health struggles serving as one of the most prevalent and frequently discussed. While exploring the issue of truancy, Test Prep Insight also asked their sample population about their feelings towards mental health absences.

Out of the surveyed parents, a fairly large percentage (73%) agree that children should be able to take mental health days. Unfortunately, despite interest in these programs, several obstacles make properly implementing them fairly difficult — the most common of which are unsupportive school policies (47%), social stigma (27%), and the fear of falling behind academically (26%). Luckily for those concerned about the last hurdle, the respondents also shared how they believe schools can support students who may need to take time to collect themselves: most notably through catch-up sessions (33%), regular check-ins from counselors (30%), flexible deadlines (25%), and providing assignments in advance (12%).

When asked about the changes they would like to see in handling childhood mental health issues, 39% of all surveyed parents called for better teacher training, 3% approved implementing mental health education in the school curriculum, 21% expressed an interest in improved communication between schools and parents, and 17% stated more on-site mental health professionals on-site.

Most also agreed these days should not be thrown around lightly, and that higher officials should be able to determine when mental health breaks are appropriate. 66% of parents say they should have the final say on whether or not a student can take one. An additional 17% believe the child’s therapist or physician is responsible for doing so, and 3% suggest that the school should decide.

To view the full study — including a detailed infographic showcasing how parents across the United States view the topic of being fined for absences — visit this page on TestPrepInsight.com.

Source link

Click to comment

South Dakota

Feeding South Dakota

Published

5 hours ago

February 27, 2026

Press Room

State

Zip Code

Country

Source link

South Dakota

SD Lottery Millionaire for Life winning numbers for Feb. 26, 2026

Published

17 hours ago

February 27, 2026

Press Room

The South Dakota Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.

Here’s a look at Feb. 26, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from Feb. 26 drawing

03-14-22-50-57, Bonus: 04

Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your prize

Prizes of $100 or less: Can be claimed at any South Dakota Lottery retailer.
Prizes of $101 or more: Must be claimed from the Lottery. By mail, send a claim form and a signed winning ticket to the Lottery at 711 E. Wells Avenue, Pierre, SD 57501.
Any jackpot-winning ticket for Dakota Cash or Lotto America, top prize-winning ticket for Lucky for Life, or for the second prizes for Powerball and Mega Millions must be presented in person at a Lottery office. A jackpot-winning Powerball or Mega Millions ticket must be presented in person at the Lottery office in Pierre.

When are the South Dakota Lottery drawings held?

Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
Mega Millions: 10 p.m. CT on Tuesday and Friday.
Lucky for Life: 9:38 p.m. CT daily.
Lotto America: 9:15 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
Dakota Cash: 9 p.m. CT on Wednesday and Saturday.
Millionaire for Life: 10:15 p.m. CT daily.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a South Dakota editor. You can send feedback using this form.

Source link

South Dakota

SNAP soda ban headed to desk of South Dakota governor, who’s concerned about costs

Published

1 day ago

February 26, 2026

Press Room

SNAP soda ban headed to desk of South Dakota governor, who’s concerned about costs

State Sen. Sydney Davis, R-Burbank, speaks in the South Dakota Senate at the Capitol in Pierre on Feb. 10, 2026. Davis is sponsoring a bill that would ban the use of SNAP benefits for soda purchases. (Photo by Makenzie Huber/South Dakota Searchlight)

By: John Hult

PIERRE, S.D. (South Dakota Searchlight) – The question of whether South Dakota moves to ban the use of government food assistance for sugary drinks is in the hands of Republican Gov. Larry Rhoden, who has signaled his opposition to the bill all through the 2026 legislative session.

The state Senate voted 27-6 on Wednesday to endorse House Bill 1056, after the House passed it earlier 58-11. Assuming the same levels of support, both margins are wide enough to overcome a Rhoden veto, should he choose to issue one.

The bill directs the Department of Social Services to ask for a federal waiver to allow the state to bar the use of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits for the purchase of soft drinks.

SNAP is a federal program, managed by the state, through which people with low incomes get a monthly allowance for food through a debit-like card that can be used at most stores to buy nearly any consumable grocery item save alcohol and prepared foods.

Representatives from Rhoden’s office testified against the bill in House and Senate committees, arguing that the administrative costs would be too high. A fiscal note attached to the bill between its passage in the House and its appearance on the Senate’s Wednesday calendar estimated that implementation would cost $310,000 through the first two years. Those costs would come from hiring an extra employee and contracting for software to track sales, file reports and help retailers determine which drinks are banned.

Backers see long-term savings to the state, though. A high percentage of SNAP recipients are also on Medicaid, a taxpayer-funded health insurance program open to disabled and income-eligible people.

On Wednesday, Burbank Republican Sen. Sydney Davis noted the connection between excess soda consumption and health problems like obesity, diabetes and tooth decay. Medicaid dental costs alone add up $51 million a year, she said.

Mitchell Republican Sen. Paul Miskimins, a retired dentist, told the body he once counted 32 cavities and seven abscesses in the mouths of 2-year-old twin boys who were covered by Medicaid.

He attributed the tooth decay to sugary beverages.

“I don’t know if that first visit was more traumatic on the boys or on my dental staff and myself,” said Miskimins.

Tamara Grove, R-Lower Brule, was the lone senator to speak in opposition on the Senate floor. She argued that some stores might stop accepting SNAP payments due to the administrative burden of sorting barred products from the rest of their inventories, and pointed out that the bill wouldn’t do a thing to prevent SNAP recipients from loading up on sugary foods like ice cream or snack cakes.

“It gives this look as if there’s going to be this big, huge change in the way that people buy products, but it’s really not going to be,” Grove said.

Some surrounding states, including Nebraska, have moved to ask for a waiver to ban soda sales through SNAP. Such waivers are now an option, as President Donald Trump’s administration is willing to consider granting them. Former President Joe Biden’s administration was not.

Rep. Taylor Rehfeldt, the South Dakota bill’s prime sponsor, got a letter last week from Trump administration officials expressing support for her proposal.

In response, Rhoden spokeswoman Josie Harms told South Dakota Searchlight that the governor “has always been supportive of the Trump Administration’s efforts to Make America Healthy Again,” using a reference to the policy agenda branding used by U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

“We have met directly with his Administration on this issue, and at no point has our opposition been directed at President Trump or his efforts to reform SNAP,” Harms said. “Our focus has always been on ensuring the implementation of SNAP reform works effectively for our state.”

Harms said Wednesday that Rhoden would answer questions about the bill at a Thursday press conference.

Source link