Connect with us

North Dakota

North Dakota Land Prices Rise Faster Than Cash Rents

Published

on

North Dakota Land Prices Rise Faster Than Cash Rents


Sustained excessive commodity costs have pushed cropland costs larger throughout North Dakota, growing 10.9% from 2021 to 2022. Nonetheless, the statewide money rental fee improve was a lot decrease at roughly 3.1%, says Bryon Parman, North Dakota State College Extension agricultural finance specialist.

The 2021 survey performed by the North Dakota Division of Belief Lands reveals rents had elevated solely 0.77% from 2020 to 2021 and land values had been up 1.74% throughout the identical time interval. In actual fact, from 2015 although 2021, rents and values throughout North Dakota had principally remained flat, and even declined to some extent, when inflation changes had been made to the yearly reported charges, says Parman.

“The very best improve in land values statewide from 2015 to 2021 was only one.74% with 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 all displaying small declines in statewide common land values,” Parman provides. “We now have to return to 2014, the place land costs elevated 8.5%, to search out a rise as excessive as that proven from 2021 to 2022.”

Statewide cropland rental charges had been reluctant to extend on the identical fee as values. With charges growing 3.1%, we want solely return to the interval from 2018 to 2019 to discover a comparable improve the place throughout that interval, statewide common charges elevated 3.61%, he provides.

Advertisement
Source: NDSU Extension

 

With important decreases in rental charges in 2016 and 2018 and a slight lower in 2020, the three.1% improve from 2021 to 2022 primarily helps maintain charges regular statewide during the last seven years. If accounting for inflation, rental charges in “actual {dollars}” have declined considerably in comparison with the place they had been in 2015.

With respect to land values, six NDSU Extension areas noticed double-digit good points in land values. The very best regional improve for 2022 occurred within the southeast the place land values elevated 22.25%. The following highest was the east-central area, growing 17.22%. The northwest, northeast and southwest areas all elevated between 11% and 12%. The north-central, north Purple River Valley and south Purple River Valley all elevated between 6% and seven% whereas the south-central NDSU area elevated the least at almost 5%.

The south Purple River Valley stays the costliest farmland at $4,521 per acre on common. The second costliest areas stay the southeastern NDSU Extension area and the north Purple River Valley area. The least costly areas stay the northwest area and the north-central NDSU Extension areas.

Advertisement

Rental fee will increase had been a lot smaller with three NDSU areas close to or under a 0% improve and no areas growing greater than 5%. The most important improve in money rents occurred within the north-central, southwest and southeast areas, all growing almost 5%. The south-central and south Purple River Valley areas each elevated roughly 3.5% whereas the northeast elevated 2.85%. Nonetheless, the north Purple River Valley elevated solely 0.6% whereas the east-central didn’t improve in any respect. The northwest really decreased 1.1%, Parman says.

The very best cropland rental charges stay within the south Purple River Valley area at a median of $132.80 per acre with the southeast and the north Purple River Valley coming in second and third at $99.30 and $92.60 per acre, respectively. The bottom charges stay within the northwest at $34.60 per acre and the southwest at $38.90 per acre. The remaining areas sit at $54-70 per acre.

“Whereas excessive commodity costs and maybe inflation seem to have pushed up the value of farmland, it additionally seems that prime manufacturing prices and presumably the flexibility to safe new or used gear has muted a rise in rental charges,” Parman says. “Certainly, low rates of interest, and robust internet farm incomes in 2020 and particularly 2021 have inspired farmers to pay extra for farmland coming in the marketplace.”

“Land consumers even have the fairness and time element on their facet and are keen to miss excessive manufacturing prices for a yr or so,” Parman provides. “Nonetheless, potential renters should give attention to what’s going on this yr, and there seems to be a reluctance to pay considerably extra in money rents than was paid from 2020 to 2021. Moreover, 2022 will probably be following a drought over a lot of North Dakota, limiting the urge for food for paying larger rents. Nonetheless, the 2021 drought doesn’t seem to have been sturdy sufficient to negate the influence of excessive commodity costs and low rates of interest influence on land values.”


Click on right here for extra No-Until Information.

Advertisement



Source link

North Dakota

Trial continues over North Dakota’s underaged transgender care law

Published

on

Trial continues over North Dakota’s underaged transgender care law


BISMARCK, N.D. (KFYR) – Testimony continued Tuesday as plaintiffs seek to overturn North Dakota’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors.

Medical experts for the plaintiffs seek to explain the harmful repercussions that could affect minors affected by gender dysphoria and going through transgender health issues. They will also spend part of the week talking with parents and kids directly impacted by the ban.

The state argues the ban is constitutionally sound and is something the legislature can legally do.

The state is expected to make its case later this week.

Advertisement

The trial is scheduled to last through Feb. 5.



Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

North Dakota bill looks to dissolve gambling oversight commission

Published

on

North Dakota bill looks to dissolve gambling oversight commission


BISMARCK — North Dakota may eliminate its Gaming Commission and place all authority to regulate gambling with the state Attorney General’s Office if a proposed bill moves forward.

The Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday gave a do-pass recommendation on

Senate Bill 2224

by a vote of 4-3. The bill seeks to streamline the gambling regulation process by eliminating the state Gaming Commission. Several legislators questioned what benefit the Commission provides, but the gambling industry warned the bill would remove key checks on the attorney general’s power.

Advertisement

The Gaming Commission is an independent entity whose members are appointed by the governor. The Commission acts as an added buffer between the Attorney General’s Office and the Administrative Rules Committee comprised of legislators.

“Gov. Armstrong mentioned all the boards and commissions and things that we have in our state, and how we need to look at which ones are pivotal for the functioning of our government and which ones are not,” Sen. Janne Myrdal, R-Edinburg, the primary sponsor of the bill, said in committee.

Sen. Janne Myrdal, R-Edinburg, asks a question during a hearing on Senate Bill 2224, which focuses on the abolition of the state Gaming Commission, at the North Dakota State Capitol on Tuesday, Jan. 28, 2025.

Tanner Ecker / The Bismarck Tribune

Advertisement

“This came to me from some concerned entities that felt like this particular commission in its duties — which they faithfully execute, obviously — is really a step that we can eliminate in the gaming industry.”

Charitable gambling generated roughly $220 million in revenue in North Dakota as of 2022, and $35 million in tax revenue for the state.

The current flow of gambling regulation in North Dakota starts with the state Attorney General’s Office, which crafts administrative rules regulating the gambling industry. Any proposed rule changes must be looked at by the Gaming Commission, which approves or denies and sends the rules back to the Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office then sends the proposed rules to the Administrative Rules Committee where they are finalized and adopted.

North Dakota Director of Charitable Gaming Deb McDaniel said the removal of the Commission would not impact the amount of work the state Attorney General’s Office is responsible for.

“I’ve always worked with the Gaming Commission, and their role is to promulgate the administrative rules … by law,” McDaniel said. “I would just be able to promulgate them without them (the Commission.)”

Advertisement

McDaniel said that while the Commission itself does not hinder the work of her office, it can create situations that do. The Commission must have all five commissioners to meet and approve rules from the Attorney General’s Office. The last time they were able to do so was Jan. 1, 2023.

Since then, there has been at least one vacancy on the Commission — there are currently two — that Gov. Doug Burgum did not fill before leaving office and Gov. Kelly Armstrong has yet to fill.

Until the vacancies are filled, McDaniel is stuck in limbo, unable to make administrative rule changes to regulate the gambling industry.

The gambling industry expressed concern about the elimination of the Commission, saying it provides a beneficial check on the attorney general’s power to govern the industry.

“Our founders knew that it would be a bad idea to give too much power to one single body,” Scott Meske, a lobbyist for the North Dakota Gaming Alliance, said. “That’s kind of what Senate Bill 2224 does; giving 100% of the oversight and regulation to one office. We think the attorney general has done a fine job in overall regulating this industry as it’s grown and changed and morphed over the past few years. But taking away this level of checks and balances is — just sets a very precarious precedent.”

Advertisement

McDaniel said even without the Commission the rules would still need to be finalized by the Administrative Rules Committee, and statute guarantees opportunities for the public — and industry — to provide comment on proposed rule changes.

The bill is expected on the Senate floor Wednesday.





Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

Requiring Public Comment Period at Local Meetings Debated in North Dakota State Legislature

Published

on

Requiring Public Comment Period at Local Meetings Debated in North Dakota State Legislature


State Sen. Bob Paulson, R-Minot, testifies in support of a bill during a public hearing at the Capitol on Jan. 24, 2025. (Michael Achterling/North Dakota Monitor)

 

(North Dakota Monitor,  Michael Achterling ) -North Dakota school boards pushed back on a Senate bill that would require public comment periods during regular meetings of local subdivisions.

Sen. Bob Paulson, R-Minot, said he is sponsoring Senate Bill 2180 in response to complaints he’s heard from around the state. Complaints include public comment being limited to once per year at local government meetings or requirements that comments be approved ahead of time or limited to agenda items.

Advertisement

“These things are currently happening in North Dakota and I believe it is incumbent upon us as legislators to protect our constituents’ ability to redress their government at all levels of our state,” Paulson told members of the Senate State and Local Government Committee last week.

An amended version of the original bill would mandate local subdivisions offer a public comment period during regular meetings at least once per month.

The bill states the local subdivision may only limit the public comment period to the time of each speaker or total time of the comment period, but it may not limit the topic of public comments to agenda items of the current meeting.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending