Connect with us

Minnesota

Minnesota housing reform proponents remain hopeful for movement

Published

on

Minnesota housing reform proponents remain hopeful for movement


ST. PAUL — A bipartisan group of Minnesota lawmakers working on housing reform remains motivated and hopeful despite hitting another roadblock this session.

One of the major bills in the overall housing reform effort, the “Starter Home Act,” stalled in committee on March 23, just before a key March 27 deadline that says committees must advance bills in their house of origin. The bill,

HF3895/SF4123

, hits on several reforms, including limiting the zoning authority of local governments, incentivizing more multifamily housing, and streamlining administrative reviews.

Advertisement

Although the bill didn’t meet that deadline, there is a chance a version or pieces of the bill will show up later in the session. Last session, smaller pieces of the housing reform, such as limiting aesthetic mandates, traveled solo and further than the bigger zoning reform bills.

Proponents of the reforms, including authors of the Starter Home Act in the Senate and House Rep. Spencer Igo, R-Wabana Township, and Sen. Jordan Rasmusson, R-Fergus Falls, remained hopeful that something could be done this session.

“I am still highly confident,” Igo said in an interview Wednesday, April 1. “Anything worth doing is never easy, and change is really hard, but the fact that we all know … whether you support land use and zoning reform or you’re against it … everything we’ve done in Minnesota in the past 10, 15 years hasn’t moved the needle yet, and it’s on us as legislators and as a state to start making changes that could make a difference, because we can’t afford to wait any longer.”

Rasmusson said that regardless of outcomes this session, “this issue isn’t going away.”

“A lot of Minnesotans, especially younger Minnesotans, are concerned about their ability to afford a home, and that’s why we’re working to make starter homes legal again here in Minnesota by reducing government overreach that’s preventing these types of homes from being built,” he said.

Advertisement
Rep. Jordan Rasmusson, R-Fergus Falls

Contributed

It’s the

third push at the Legislature

for the housing reform; its first official appearance was at the end of the 2024 session. Igo said there have been roughly 30 different versions of the bill as a result of weekly meetings with stakeholders and opponents.

Advertisement

Daniel Lightfoot, senior intergovernmental relations representative at League of Minnesota Cities, said that while cities are always opposed to local preemption, the League of Minnesota Cities has taken a more neutral stance this session as a result of some changes made in the interim to accommodate flexibility for cities.

“Previous iterations of this bill were much more sweeping, and they applied statewide, forced density everywhere, without accounting for infrastructure and things like that, and because cities stayed engaged, the current bill certainly is more targeted … and ultimately, better reflects how cities actually operate,” he said.

One of those changes is a “menu-based option,” Igo said, where, based on population, cities can pick changes that work for them to meet the new land use and zoning requirements.

The Starter Home Act is a policy bill, meaning it comes without state funding — the Legislature also isn’t in a budget-building session — but cities note that the reforms could cost them instead.

Igo said it’s “probably true” that the reforms could cost cities, but pointed to potential long-term returns, such as community growth or a larger tax base, should affordable housing become available.

Advertisement

“I think it’s really easy to look short-sighted and freak out about why that would hurt in the early phases, but think about what’s going to happen in the long run,” he said.

Lightfoot argues that it remains to be seen whether these reforms would actually result in more affordable housing. During the hearing on March 23, Rep. Patty Acomb, DFL-Minnetonka, said she’s concerned the Starter Home Act would not address affordable housing, but only housing supply.

“There is nothing in here that is going to ensure affordable units are built,” she said. “I encourage that we allow our communities who have elected officials who represent and are accountable to our constituents be allowed to continue to do the good work cities are doing.”

Opponents have also argued that the bill is another overreach on local government. But lawmakers in support are pushing back on that. Rasmusson said there are several occasions where it might be better for the state to step in, and pointed to how local units of government used to have their own building codes before the state stepped in.

“It created a lot of confusion for builders and for the marketplace. We don’t allow local units of government to have their own gun laws, right? They’re preempted on that,” he said.

Advertisement

Rep. Nathan Coulter, DFL-Bloomington, said during the March 23 hearing for the bill that “government overreach is very much a thing on the local level.”

“It is absolutely possible for local governments to overreach, and I have seen it happen time and time again,” he said. “And the result is, when it comes to housing, that not only are we punishing the communities that want to do the right thing, but we are punishing the people.”





Source link

Minnesota

Minnesota congressman says he suffered from ‘long COVID’

Published

on

Minnesota congressman says he suffered from ‘long COVID’


In a letter last month urging federal officials to fund research into “long COVID,” U.S. Rep. Pete Stauber revealed he dealt for years with the chronic condition, which can leave patients with debilitating symptoms well after a coronavirus infection.

In a March 9 letter to National Institutes of Health Director Jay Bhattacharya, the northeastern Minnesota Republican said he struggled with symptoms like vertigo, carpal tunnel syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, hearing and sight deterioration before a diagnosis of long COVID. But a treatment protocol that followed helped symptoms subside within six weeks, he said.

“I truly believe that this diagnosis and treatment saved my life,” Stauber said.

Now, he’s urging the NIH to continue funding research and trials into long COVID and its potential treatments.

Advertisement

“I stand ready to work with you to address Long COVID and help the millions of Americans who have suffered from this devastating disease,” Stauber wrote.

Stauber’s office declined an interview with the Duluth News Tribune and did not respond to a list of emailed questions about his experience with long COVID and his advocacy for treatment.

The letter represents the most the congressman has shared about his experience with COVID-19, a respiratory virus.

Stauber’s public messaging on the 2020 pandemic largely criticized Democrats’ response, and he has so far refused to answer whether he’s been vaccinated.

Billy Hanlon, a 37-year-old Robbinsdale man who has long COVID and is an advocate for research of the condition, said he applauds Stauber for sending the letter and hopes it prompts others, regardless of political affiliation, to share their experiences.

Advertisement

“We know a letter doesn’t solve a problem,” Hanlon said, “but it does help create momentum and accountability that our community desperately does need.”

There’s no diagnostic test or biomarkers for the diagnosis and, therefore, no path for therapeutics. The Food and Drug Administration has not approved a treatment specifically for long COVID.

But with proper funding into research, Hanlon and others are hopeful that can change.

“My life’s work now is really involved in advocacy and trying to expedite and fast track research to be able to get to answers of, physiologically, what’s happening in the body? How does that lead to FDA-approved treatment so that millions of Americans can get back to their lives that they once recognized and the futures that they once envisioned?” Hanlon said.

In his letter, Stauber called on NIH to continue investing in research through programs like the RECOVER Initiative, which specifically investigates long COVID, or the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health, which funds “high-potential, high-impact” research, according to its website.

Advertisement

Last year, the Trump administration cut, but later reversed, some research grants under the RECOVER Initiative. It also cut the Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Long COVID and Office of Long COVID Research and Practice.

Asked how NIH plans to invest in long COVID research and if Americans could trust the funding will remain stable, NIH, in an emailed statement to the News Tribune, pointed to its RECOVER Initiative, noting it received more than $650 million in congressional funding in 2024.

“The program continues to accept applications for pathobiology studies to advance the understanding of long COVID,” NIH said. “Just last month, the initiative expanded a clinical trial arm, creating new opportunities to participate in long COVID research.”

NIH did not say whether it responded to Stauber’s letter.

President Donald Trump’s proposed 2027 budget request released last week calls for a $5 billion cut, or nearly 11%, in NIH’s budget.

Advertisement

Hanlon hopes disruptions to funding are over and commitments to more funding for long COVID come through.

As noted in Stauber’s letter, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. held a roundtable in September on long COVID, so the administration is thinking about the condition, Hanlon said.

But now Hanlon wants action — specifically, boosted and consistent research funding.

“The ones that will suffer when there are these different dynamics that slow down research, the ones that are hit the hardest are the millions of Americans that are depending on rapid progress,” Hanlon said.

In his letter, Stauber said he hoped more treatment options became available.

Advertisement

“I shudder to think of those who are still suffering in silence,” Stauber wrote.



Source link

Continue Reading

Minnesota

Where to watch Tampa Bay Rays vs Minnesota Twins: TV channel, start time, streaming for Apr. 5

Published

on

Where to watch Tampa Bay Rays vs Minnesota Twins: TV channel, start time, streaming for Apr. 5


play

Baseball is back and finding what channel your favorite team is playing on has become a little bit more confusing since MLB announced plans to produce and distribute broadcasts for nearly a third of the league.

We’re here to help. Here’s everything you need to know Sunday as the Tampa Bay Rays visit the Minnesota Twins.

Advertisement

See USA TODAY’s sortable MLB schedule to filter by team or division.

What time is Tampa Bay Rays vs Minnesota Twins?

First pitch between the Minnesota Twins and Tampa Bay Rays is scheduled for 2:10 p.m. (ET) on Sunday, Apr. 5.

How to watch Tampa Bay Rays vs Minnesota Twins on Sunday

All times Eastern and accurate as of Sunday, April 5, 2026, at 10:03 a.m.

  • Matchup: TB at MIN
  • Date: Sunday, Apr. 5
  • Time: 2:10 p.m. (ET)
  • Venue: Target Field
  • Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • TV: Twins.TV and Rays.TV
  • Streaming: MLB.TV on Fubo

Watch MLB all season long with Fubo

MLB regional blackout restrictions apply

MLB scores, results

MLB scores for Apr. 5 games are available on usatoday.com . Here’s how to access today’s results:

Advertisement

See scores, results for all of today’s games.



Source link

Continue Reading

Minnesota

Morning Skate Wrap Up: Wild at Senators | Minnesota Wild

Published

on

Morning Skate Wrap Up: Wild at Senators | Minnesota Wild


The Wild and Senators meet for the final time this season today at 12:00 p.m. CT on FanDuel Sports Network and KFAN FM 100.3. Minnesota earned a 3-2 win over Ottawa in the first meeting back on December 13, that saw Tyler Pitlick, Ryan Hartman and Joel Eriksson Ek (GWG) all score. Jesper Wallstedt stopped 34-of-36 shots faced in the win. Minnesota clinched a spot in the Stanley Cup Playoff with its win over Vancouver on Thursday night, while Ottawa is clinging onto the eighth spot in the Eastern Conference with 88 points on the season, tied with Detroit, Columbus and Philadelphia.

Wallstedt will get the start for Minnesota today, looking to earn a sweep over Ottawa this season. In his last start, Wallstedt earned a 3-2 win over Florida, stopping 18-of-20 shots faced. He owns a 15-8-6 record on the season with a 2.73 GAA, a .911 SV% and four shutouts. Linus Ullmark is the expected starter for Ottawa today—he comes in off a 4-1 win over the Buffalo Sabres where he stopped 21-of-22 shots faced. On the season, Ullmark is 24-11-8 with a 2.81 GAA, a .887 SV% and two shutouts.

Vladimir Tarasenko will skate in his 900th career NHL game today. He’s had a resurgent season with the Wild, tallying 21 goals and 42 points (21-21=42), after scoring 11 goals in 80 games with Detroit last season. He ranks third on the Wild in goals and fifth in shots (135) this season. Through his first 899 games, Tarasenko has recorded 704 points (325-379=704) and 75 power-play goals. If he scores today, it will mark his 12th career goal against Ottawa in 23 career meetings.

Players to Watch:

Advertisement

Quinn Hughes: After becoming the fastest player in franchise history to reach 50 points (43 games), Hughes will look to extend his point-streak (0-3=3) to three games. He has collected 21 points (2-19=21) in 19 career games against the Senators.

Kirill Kaprizov: He comes into today’s game after scoring his 40th goal of the season on Thursday night against Vancouver. Like Hughes, he will also look to extend his point-streak (2-1=3) to three games. Kaprizov owns eight points (3-5=8) in seven games against Ottawa.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending