Connect with us

Milwaukee, WI

‘Top Chef: Wisconsin’ Episode 12 recap: On the final episode filmed in Wisconsin, the chefs get reflective

Published

on

‘Top Chef: Wisconsin’ Episode 12 recap: On the final episode filmed in Wisconsin, the chefs get reflective


play

Warning: Spoilers ahead for “Top Chef” Season 21, Episode 12, which aired June 5, 2024.     

Take a bow, Wisconsin. You’ve put on a good show. 

Advertisement

Twelve weeks after the chefs walked into the Top Chef Kitchen, four are leaving the state on their journey to the finals. It’s been a fun ride, and a blast to see so many familiar faces and places on the small screen.

Did you have a favorite “Top Chef” challenge set in Wisconsin? I adored the Indigenous cuisine challenge, had a blast watching the Famous Racing Sausages, and of course, I’ll always have a soft spot for the cheese festival, Restaurant Wars and fish boil challenges — all episode tapings I was lucky enough to attend. 

But Wisconsin’s time in the “Top Chef” spotlight wrapped up this week, with an Elimination Challenge that was less about the setting of the season and more about how the competition shaped the chefs along the way. 

And appropriately enough, a handful of Wisconsin chefs were in attendance to wish the contestants “bon voyage” as they head to the finals next week. Find the full list of them below, plus the final Milwaukee sites we see for the season. 

And just because “Top Chef” is leaving Wisconsin doesn’t mean these recaps are over. I’ll be here sharing the play-by-play during both episodes of the finals, until the season wraps on June 19.

Advertisement

What in MKE did we see?: The Milwaukee lakefront, the Milwaukee River, the Sixth Street Viaduct, Ristorante Bartolotta, Milwaukee Public Market, The Pfister Hotel, the ASQ Center, Harbor House, the Milwaukee Art Museum 

Celebrity sightings: Bartolotta Restaurants Owner/Co-Founder Paul Bartolotta, Bartolotta Restaurants Director of Catering Maria Bartolotta, Ristorante Bartolotta Executive Chef/General Manager Juan Urbieta, The Diplomat Chef/Owner Dane Baldwin, Birch Chef/Owner Kyle Knall, Wild Bearies Executive Chef/Founder Elena Terry, L’Etoile Chef/Owner Tory Miller, Food & Wine Editor-in-Chief Hunter Lewis, Three Brothers Restaurant Chef/General Manager Milunka Radicevic  

Where was the challenge set? Harbor House in Milwaukee 

How did Dan do? It was not his best showing. In fact, it was probably his worst. He absolutely bungled his steak-and-eggs Quickfire Challenge dish and was heavy-handed with smoke for his whitefish-centered Elimination Challenge dish. He landed in the bottom three … but, spoiler alert: He squeaked by to move on to the penultimate episode of “Top Chef.” 

Advertisement

Best Wisconsin-related quote: “Were you going with cheddar ‘cause I’m from Wisconsin? Working the judge?” —Paul Bartolotta 

During one of the last group gatherings of the season at the chefs’ residence, the final five reflected on their time in the competition, appreciating the feedback they’d received, the inspiration they’d take to their restaurants back home, and the tight bond they’d made over the season. 

“It’s cool to come here not knowing anybody and leaving with a bunch of new friends,” Dan said to the group. 

“And an uncle … or a grandpa,” Danny replied, joking. (One last “old man Dan” crack for the road.)

Soon the group would be whittled to four, and no matter how tight-knit they had become, friendship couldn’t get in the way of the competition. 

Advertisement

The Quickfire Challenge: A feast for the senses 

“Last Quickfire in Milwaukee, man. What are we doing today?” Dan asked his car-mates on their way to the Top Chef Kitchen. 

After they arrived, they got their answer with the help of Milwaukee chef and restaurateur Paul Bartolotta. For an episode about reflection, it was fitting he’d be there for the final episode taped in his city. Bartolotta was a major factor in bringing the show to Wisconsin, after all, and he appeared as a guest judge on the season’s first episode 12 weeks ago. 

Bartolotta helped reveal this week’s Quickfire Challenge, the blind taste-test challenge — a perennial favorite on “Top Chef,” and one where the chefs would attempt to identify 26 mystery ingredients while blindfolded. 

After the blindfold challenge, the chefs would then have to cook a dish in 30 minutes using only the ingredients they correctly identified, plus a limited pantry for support. 

Advertisement

The chef who guessed the most ingredients correctly would win $5,000. The chef with the best dish would receive $10,000. 

Each chef had five minutes to taste ingredients like anchovies, za’atar, okra, pork chops, quinoa, umeboshi, gooseberries, watermelon, flank steak and more. 

Should’ve been a cinch for these chefs’ refined palates, right? Well … sort of. 

“I have an incredible palate,” Dan said. “This should be pretty easy.” 

Smash-cut to every other chef correctly identifying rosemary while Dan whiffed by guessing oregano. 

Advertisement

But he wasn’t the worst. Technically, he was tied for the worst. After five minutes were up, he and Savannah both identified nine ingredients correctly. Danny was next with 13, followed by Laura’s 15. And Manny, who flew through the ingredients as he tasted, impressively identified 23 of the 26 mystery ingredients. 

He’d be able to use them all, if he wanted, in his Quickfire dish. But when it came time for Kish, Bartolotta, and judges Tom Colicchio and Gail Simmons to taste it, he failed to incorporate enough flavor in his salmon to impress them.

Even so, he fared better than Dan, who botched a sauce he’d tried to piece together from his short list of ingredients (you mean watermelon, kalamata olives, soy sauce and red wine vinegar didn’t work together?), then bailed and went with a steak and eggs dish (complete with egg shells for crunch) that he sheepishly served the judges, knowing he’d failed. 

“This was by far the worst thing I’ve probably ever made,” he said. 

But Savannah, who also had just nine ingredients, wowed with her stripped-down creation. She made a crispy fried pork chop with a faux Caesar dressing made with cheddar cheese in place of the traditional Parmesan. 

Advertisement

“Were you going with cheddar ‘cause I’m from Wisconsin? Working the judge?” Bartolotta asked with a smile.  

It worked. The judges loved her clever twist.  

“That belongs on a menu somewhere. It’s really good,” Colicchio said.  

The dish won Savannah the Quickfire Challenge — her third in a row — and brought her total cash winnings to $38,000. 

Advertisement

The Elimination Challenge Reveal: A wealth of wisdom learned in Wisconsin 

“OK, chefs, who’s ready to take a walk down memory lane?” Kish asked. 

For the final Elimination Challenge set in Wisconsin, the chefs would need to create a dish that reflected the growth they’ve made here over 12 episodes. 

No other parameters were placed on the chefs, who would have $150 to spend at the Milwaukee Public Market and $200 at Whole Foods Market to create a dish for 10 judges dining at Harbor House, Bartolotta’s restaurant on the shore of Lake Michigan in downtown Milwaukee. 

But before the chefs went shopping, Bartolotta treated them to dinner at another one of his area restaurants: Ristorante Bartolotta, which celebrated its 30th year as “Top Chef” was filming in Wisconsin last summer. 

“You feel the love in that space. It’s a special place,” Dan said of the Italian restaurant located in Wauwatosa. 

Advertisement

“Top Chef” showed it off nicely, with loads of lingering shots of the restaurant’s dishes piling up on the table. Maria Bartolotta, Paul’s sister and the restaurant group’s director of catering, met the chefs and judges, and each dish was presented table-side by Executive Chef Juan Urbieta.  

While dining, the chefs reflected on their time on the show and the growth they experienced, while Bartolotta and Kish offered advice about changing and challenging yourself as you develop as a chef. 

“For me, the biggest lesson on ‘Top Chef’ was knowing that I was good enough and that I could trust myself,” Kish said. “And that will change the way you cook.” 

Solid advice at this stage in the game from a “Top Chef” winner. 

Advertisement

The Elimination Challenge: A season of change at Milwaukee’s Harbor House 

Visits to the Milwaukee Public Market (including stops at The Spice House, the West Allis Cheese & Sausage Shoppe and St. Paul Fish Company) and Whole Foods Market helped shape the chefs’ stories for this last Wisconsin-based cook. 

Manny planned a fish dish he felt comfortable with (yet again…), hoping to redeem himself after a poor showing at the fish boil two weeks prior. Danny and Laura both aimed to show restraint in their dishes after going overboard in the past. Dan and Savannah were still trying to find their stories while shopping, but the absence of fresh lemongrass at Whole Foods meant Dan’s story would need to shapeshift a bit — he’d have to rely on turmeric-lemongrass paste to build the sauce he’d planned. 

When the chefs arrived at Harbor House, Savannah’s storyline took shape. She planned to make a potato pavé in three hours — a dish that typically needs to be pressed overnight to work successfully. But coming off her hot streak, she was confident she could pull it off. 

Everyone seemed confident for such a high-pressure cook. Danny danced up a storm in the kitchen, Manny felt good about his red snapper, Dan was loving his improvised sauce, Laura was happy to bring a taste of her Mexican heritage into her Mediterranean dish. 

They’d be serving their dishes to a number of Wisconsin chefs we’ve seen guest judge in previous episodes: Bartolotta, Baldwin, Knall, Terry and Miller. They were joined by the three judges as well as Lewis and Radicevic. 

Advertisement

First up was Savannah and her shortcut potato pavé served with burnt onion and cherry jam with a chicken sauce reduction. She explained that the heat and pressure are all that’s needed to make a potato pavé, just like how the heat and pressure of the competition were all she needed to bring out her confidence. 

The judges were all smiles, impressed by her articulate storyline and just as impressed that she managed to pull off an impressive pavé in such a short amount of time. 

“I love a potato pavé and I love it even more now that Savannah told us why she made a potato pavé,” Kish said. 

But they weren’t as impressed with Manny’s dish, a snapper a la Veracruzano with creamy potatoes and saltines. He’d said he wanted to show off his roots and honor the cuisine of his Mexican ancestry — a beautiful homage, for sure, but one that had nothing to do with his journey or time spent in Wisconsin, as Knall pointed out. 

It was a through line in much of the season for Manny, who often leaned on the same style of dishes (meat, sauce, vegetable) to present each week.

Advertisement

But more egregious were the three completely raw servings of fish. Bartolotta said his was cooked perfectly, which Colicchio raised his eyebrows at. Manny’s dish was inconsistent around the table, and raw fish — not undercooked — is a major no-no. 

Danny’s dish was meant to be a redemption of the lackluster buckwheat tea he’d created during Restaurant Wars. This time around, he made a soba cha mushroom broth with mushroom puree and cod, a dish he called “subtle” with “nuanced flavors,” which shocked the judges. 

“You think this is subtle?” Simmons asked. 

They thought the mushroom flavors were bold, so much so that the cod was completely lost in the dish, according to Radicevic. And Kish pointed out that if Danny was going for redemption, he needed to bring his tea concept to the forefront of the dish. 

Advertisement

Dan struggled finding his story as he cooked (“I feel like I’m forcing square pegs into round holes,” he said), and a misfire in the kitchen certainly didn’t help. Time got away from him and he let his whitefish smoke for longer than he’d planned. 

He served his dish anyway: smoked walleye and potato dumplings with lemongrass, turmeric and brown butter emulsion. 

“The backbone of this dish is all about Wisconsin,” he said. 

That might have been true, but there was a lot going on with it. Kish said all she could taste was smoke while Terry said it felt heavy. Lewis called it “absolute maximalist” while Colicchio said it suffered from an “identity crisis.” 

There were decent flavors there, they said, but it was a lot to take on, with Simmons summing it up by saying the “story and the dish were muddled.” 

Advertisement

But things ended on a high note with Laura’s lamb manti (a Turkish dumpling) with barbacoa sauce, a simplified (for her) dish that showed she’d gained focus as the competition went on. 

The judges had googly eyes for the stunning dish from the start. 

“The dumpling pasta is pure love,” Lewis said. 

Kish said the technicality of the dish was difficult to ignore and the plating was beautiful before thanking the guest judges for joining them throughout the season in Wisconsin. 

“We’re wrapping up our time here in Wisconsin and I just wanted to take the time to say thank you to the pillars of the community for welcoming us, for teaching us about your beautiful state and sharing all your time and talents,” Kish said to the table of guest judges. 

Advertisement

But the pleasantries wouldn’t last. It was time to select a final four. 

Who won ‘Top Chef: Wisconsin’ Episode 12? 

Back in the Top Chef Kitchen, Bartolotta and Lewis joined the judges’ table and wasted no time revealing the week’s top dish. 

“The winning chef today told a wonderful story and also executed a dish with precision,” Lewis said, before Bartolotta announced that Savannah’s hot streak would continue. 

“I’m so stoked,” Savannah said as she fought back tears upon learning she was this week’s winner. She’ll have an advantage going into next week’s finals challenge. 

Advertisement

“You had a beginning and an end and it was all right there,” Colicchio said of her story and dish. 

“Pavé in that amount of time? What were you thinking?” Bartolotta asked, smiling. “And yet, boom, you nailed it.” 

“I feel like I’m the one to beat here,” Savannah said. “I’m realizing it, and I think other people are, too.” 

Who was sent home on ‘Top Chef: Wisconsin’ Episode 12? 

Before revealing the bottom three dishes of the week, Kish announced Laura would be joining Savannah in the final four, her focused dish proving she’d grown from throwing together all the ingredients she could find.

Advertisement

That meant Danny, Dan and Manny had the least-favorite dishes. Danny’s was incongruent with his storyline of subtlety. Dan used too much smoke and his dish didn’t show growth from the stellar smoked walleye dish he’d won with at Restaurant Wars. Manny’s raw fish was unacceptable and the overall dish didn’t reflect what he’d learned in the competition. 

As the judges deliberated, it was a toss-up between Manny and Dan, especially considering Dan’s exceptionally poor Quickfire dish (it was “actually terrible,” Simmons said). 

But the judges couldn’t overlook the raw fish, which brought Manny’s journey on “Top Chef” to an end. 

“I served raw fish on ‘Top Chef.’ I’m taking ownership of what I did wrong,” he said. “Being part of ‘Top Chef’ has changed me as a person and as a chef. I cannot put it in words. You just feel it.” 

His and the rest of the chefs’ time in Wisconsin would end. But the top four — Dan, Danny, Laura and Savannah — still have a journey ahead of them. 

Advertisement

They’ll go home for a few weeks, then get together again for the first of two finals episodes, which will take place on a Caribbean cruise in Curaçao, a Dutch Caribbean island just north of Venezuela.  

Next week, in Curaçao, one chef will be eliminated, with three moving on to the final challenge to compete for the title of Top Chef.  

How to watch ‘Top Chef: Wisconsin’: TV channel, streaming    

Viewers can watch live on Bravo on Wednesday nights at 8 p.m. or stream the next day on Peacock, BravoTV.com or the Bravo app. 



Source link

Advertisement

Milwaukee, WI

MPD officer accused of using Flock cameras to monitor dating partner resigns

Published

on

MPD officer accused of using Flock cameras to monitor dating partner resigns


play

Josue Ayala has resigned from the Milwaukee Police Department days after he was charged with a crime over his alleged misuse of license plate-reading Flock technology.

Ayala, 33, pleaded not guilty to one count of attempted misconduct in public office during his initial court appearance on March 4.

Advertisement

The charge is a misdemeanor that carries a potential maximum penalty of nine months in jail and $10,000 fine.

Milwaukee is one in a growing number of communities nationally that have started using Flock cameras to help locate stolen vehicles, identify vehicles used in violent crimes, and track vehicles associated with missing persons. The technology is controversial and been criticized by civil rights and privacy advocates.

Conducting searches for personal reasons is a violation of department policies.

Prosecutors say Ayala used the Flock camera system while on duty more than 120 times to look up the license plate of someone he was dating. They believe Flock technology also was used on a second license plate, one belonging to that person’s ex, 55 times, according to a criminal complaint, filed Feb. 24 in Milwaukee County Circuit Court.

Ayala joined the Milwaukee Police Department in 2017, and his total gross pay was about $120,000 in 2024, according to the most recent city salary data available. 

Advertisement

Milwaukee police confirmed in a March 4 email to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that Ayala has resigned from the department.

Ayala and his attorney Michael J. Steinle, of Milwaukee, would not speak to reporters as they left the courtroom.

Prosecutors say the department became aware of the allegations against Ayala after a driver saw that they were the subject of searches through the website, www.haveibeenflocked.com, which collects and publishes “audit logs” of searches of the Flock system by police agencies.

The driver saw that Ayala had searched the plate numerous times, which prompted the driver to file a complaint with the Milwaukee Police Department.

Advertisement

Detectives then audited Ayala’s searches in the Flock system from March 26, 2025, through May 26, 2025.

Ayala is at least the second Wisconsin officer to face criminal charges for misuse of the Flock system. A Menasha police officer was charged in January for tracking an ex-girlfriend’s car. 

Milwaukee police began using Flock cameras in 2022. MPD has a $182,900 contract with Flock for the use of the technology. That contract is active through January 2027.

Court Commissioner Dewey B. Martin released Ayala on a $2,500 signature bond March 4.

Advertisement

Signature bonds, sometimes referred to as a personal recognizance bond, allow a defendant to leave custody without paying cash as long as they sign a promise to appear for their upcoming court dates.

Martin also ordered Ayala not to contact the two victims in the case.

Ayala also must report to the Milwaukee County Jail to be booked on March 9. If he doesn’t show up, a bench warrant will be issued for his arrest.

Ayala is scheduled to appear for a pre-trial conference on April 17. 

David Clarey of the Journal Sentinel contributed to this story.

Advertisement

Chris Ramirez covers courts for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. He can be reached at caramirez@usatodayco.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Milwaukee, WI

Why are Milwaukee-area students protesting ICE actions?

Published

on

Why are Milwaukee-area students protesting ICE actions?


Ever since the shooting deaths of Renee Good and Alex Pretti, both by federal agents in Minneapolis in January, there have been numerous student protests by high school students across the country – including several in Wisconsin and the Milwaukee area.

Students at Milwaukee Public Schools’ high schools including Milwaukee King, Ronald Reagan, and others; Wauwatosa East High School, Shorewood High School, Menomonee Falls High School, Nicolet High School, Whitefish Bay High School – even one student at Marquette University High School – have all walked out of school to protest Immigrations and Customs’ Enforcement actions in Minneapolis and nationwide.

What is it about ICE’s actions that have students walking out? How are school districts handling it, and what do students and parents think?

UW-Madison political science professor shares thoughts on what’s behind student walkouts

Advertisement

Political science professor emeritus Howard Schweber of the University of Wisconsin-Madison said several factors play into why students are protesting.

One of those factors is that ICE raids have taken place near schools. In some school districts, teachers have been arrested and students have disappeared. In some areas of Minneapolis, schools have had to switch to remote learning because students feared ICE raids, Schweber said.

Second, Schweber said the walkouts tie in to past student protests over guns in schools; high school students are feeling unsafe in their schools.

“They’re feeling threatened by forces, you know, far beyond their control, and feeling like first, it was their government wouldn’t protect them. This time it’s their government that’s doing it to them. Of course I’m only speaking from the perspective of the students who are protesting. I don’t mean to suggest that all students feel this way, but the ones who are protesting, this is, I think, what is driving them,” he said.

Advertisement

“Unlike some other issues, I think this one – like the guns in schools issues – hits very close to home, and makes them feel personally involved and threatened by the situation,” he said.

Schweber also talked about where the First Amendment applies during these situations.

He said students, particularly high school students, do have First Amendment rights. He said that schools may not punish students for expressing one viewpoint as opposed to another, and that any policy must be neutral. However, he said, students who walk out, and especially students who engage in conduct that disrupts school activities, can be disciplined.

“The legal background to this is students have a right to express themselves, but while they’re in school or while they’re supposed to be in school, that right is quite curtailed,” he said. “I noticed that in Madison, for example, there were some protests that were held after school ended in order to avoid this problem, which is certainly one way to avoid the issue, but then it’s not a walkout.”

How school districts deal with the walkouts

When it comes to walkouts, school districts typically approach them from several perspectives: attendance, neutrality, recognizing freedom of speech and safety.

Advertisement

In general, school districts will mark students who participate in walkouts as absent and unexcused unless their parents call in to excuse them. Most districts surveyed by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel also stressed that walkouts are student-sponsored and not organized or sanctioned by the districts.

For example, Pewaukee High School principal Brian Sniff said in a letter to parents that a Feb. 4 walkout at that school was student-initiated and student-led. He said that while students planning the walkout consulted with administration for clarity on the school’s expectations and potential consequences so they could make an informed decision about their plans, the district did not endorse or encourage the activity.

At the same time, some districts have acknowledged that students have free speech rights, as guaranteed by the First Amendment.

While reiterating that students who walk out are unexcused unless a parent excuses them, the Wauwatosa School District said in a letter to parents in advance of a Jan. 12 walkout that it values and encourages student self-expression and recognizes the “importance of civic engagement as part of a well-rounded education.”

“We view moments like this as opportunities for young people to explore their voices, deepen their understanding of social issues, and learn about the power of collective action in a safe and constructive way,” the letter said.

Advertisement

Safety is also another factor that districts consider.

South Milwaukee School District Superintendent Deidre Roemer, Shorewood High School principal Tim Kenney and Franklin High School principal Michael Vuolo said in their letters to parents before planned walkouts that staff would not supervise students who left school grounds.

Sniff said that if students walked out, administrators and security would monitor the situation, ensure they remained in designated safe areas on campus and prevent conflict. But he added that supervision means ensuring safety, and does not equal support.

Parent, student perspective

Jamie Esser, a parent of a child attending Pewaukee High School, said she supported the walkout there. She said teens getting involved with politics and social issues was “heartwarming” to her.

“I think our children, ever since lockdown, have been isolated and stuck in their cell phones and stuck on social media and not really interacting with each other or looking at the world at large. So I think – especially with all the controversy around ICE and around the treatment of their fellow Americans or even fellow human beings – I think it’s great that kids are taking up concerns, and as far as I’m concerned, it’s very promising for the future that today’s generation sees the injustice and just wants to be heard that they don’t agree with it,” Esser said.

Advertisement

Conversely, Joe Rivera, a parent and school board candidate for the Wisconsin Hudson School District in northwestern Wisconsin, said he was concerned about inconsistencies in how that district told parents it would handle a walkout v. what actually happened.

The walkout took place, even though the district told parents that students would not be allowed to leave campus and that classes would continue as scheduled, a Feb. 14 post on his campaign Facebook page said.

“Allowing a large, pre-planned demonstration during the school day – after communicating it would not be allowed – created confusion, undermined trust, and placed students in unnecessary danger, the post said. “We do not have to look far to see how similar situations, even nearby, have escalated quickly and turned tragic.”

“As a parent in this district, I find it unacceptable that families were told one thing and experienced another – especially when it involves student supervision and safety during the school day,” the post said.

Thomas Stilp, a Marquette University High School student, said he was among several students who were organizing a walkout at his school in February. Things looked ready to go until the night before the walkout. That’s when organizers heard concerns that the walkout might draw unwanted attention from ICE; those concerns led them to cancel the event.

Advertisement

Stilp said he thinks students fear that what’s happening in Minnesota will eventually happen in Milwaukee.

“What we really want is the whole country to be doing this, and if people are leaving schools and people are shutting down their offices and are not showing up to work, like businesses are closed; if you can’t get your coffee in the morning because of these ICE raids that are happening and businesses are calling for that to be stopped, that’s when you’re going to notice,” he said.

However, not all students support the walkouts.

One of those students is Turner Dittrich, a senior at Arrowhead High School and a founder, former president and current member of the school’s chapter of the conservative organization Turning Point. He is also the son of Terry Dittrich, the Waukesha County Republican Party chairman.

Advertisement

Turner Dittrich said that while people have the right to protest, they should not interfere with ICE, which is investigating criminal behavior.

“My whole take on it is, is why should undocumented illegal citizens get the same immunity as the ones who sacrifice to follow the law? We are America. We are a country of laws,” he said.

Dittrich said anti-ICE protests have been boosted by students who simply do not want to be in school. He also said he does not think it’s right for students to miss school for protests, out of respect for teachers.

“At Arrowhead especially, I’ve met some phenomenal teachers, some phenomenal individuals. They wake up tired and they’re really pouring out their energy into what they’re teaching students. For the ICE protests to not be done at 3:30 or 4 [after school] is just shocking to me because it’s like, what are these teachers possibly doing? Now, I understand freedom of speech. They can’t control kids necessarily, but at the end of the day, when teachers are getting paid to show up and work hard, it just unfortunately saddens me.

“It’s the same thing if there was a pro-ICE protest. I would think that during school hours, it’d be wrong, right? So I think on both sides of the aisle, the fact that we’re doing this during school hours, is wrong. It can’t be done that way,” Dittrich said.

Advertisement

Contact Alec Johnson at (262) 875-9469 or alec.johnson@jrn.com. Follow him on X (Twitter) at @AlecJohnson12.





Source link

Continue Reading

Milwaukee, WI

Milwaukee Common Council opposes We Energies’ data center rate plan

Published

on

Milwaukee Common Council opposes We Energies’ data center rate plan


play

The Milwaukee Common Council has called on state utility regulators to reject We Energies’ data center rate proposal in its current form.

The council unanimously adopted a resolution March 3 opposing We Energies’ proposal to create a separate energy rate for large-scale data centers, saying the plan does not go far enough to protect ratepayers.

Advertisement

At the same time, a group of council members led by District 14 Ald. Marina Dimitrijevic is drafting a six-month moratorium on data center development in the city of Milwaukee.

We Energies’ plan “is not a good deal for Milwaukeeans,” Dimitrijevic said during a Common Council meeting March 3.

We Energies’ proposal would create a separate energy rate for “very large” customers with an expected load of 500 megawatts or more. These very large customers, which include data center developers like Microsoft and Vantage, would pay for the massive amount of new infrastructure being built to serve them.

In October, We Energies filed plans to build more than $5 billion in new solar projects and natural gas plants to meet electricity demand brought by hyperscale data centers.

Advertisement

The utility says its rate plan protects customers from bearing costs associated with these projects, and hold data center companies responsible for costs through the life of the new assets.

“Our proposal is fair, transparent, and establishes strong safeguards — including binding agreements so data centers owners, not other customers, pay for the infrastructure they require,” We Energies spokesperson Brendan Conway said in a statement. “That means Wisconsin families are not subsidizing these projects.”

The resolution, introduced by Dimitrijevic, calls for stronger ratepayer protections, including binding service agreements that last the life of new infrastructure and include termination charges. It also wants the “very large” customer threshold lowered from 500 megawatts to prevent avoidance by data center companies.

In filings submitted to the Public Service Commission, We Energies said it would be willing to lower the threshold to 250 megawatts.

The resolution took particular issue with We Energies’ proposed cost split for the new natural gas plants. Under the current proposal, data center companies would pay for 75% of operating and maintenance, and other ratepayers would cover the remaining 25% as well as annual fuel costs.

Advertisement

We Energies says the plants will serve all customers as demand for energy is projected to rise across rate classes.

“If data centers never existed, we would’ve had to have built other plants, other power generation to meet our customers’ increasing need,” Conway previously told the Journal Sentinel.

The resolution said data center companies should pay “100% of all incremental and fixed costs required to serve them, including generation capacity, operations and maintenance, and fuel costs attributable to serving the data center load.”

Council members’ concerns echo those brought by environmental and consumer advocacy groups during a public hearing Feb. 10. The Public Service Commission will rule on the proposal by May 1.

This is not the first time the City of Milwaukee has weighed in on We Energies cases brought before the Public Service Commission. It’s intervened in opposition to previous energy rate hikes proposed by the utility, arguing they disproportionately burden thousands of low-income Milwaukee households.

Advertisement

In December, Dimitrijevic proposed a six-month moratorium on data center development in the city. The pause will give council members time to establish a regulatory framework for large-scale data center proposals, she told the Journal Sentinel.

“Sometimes the economy moves so quickly that we haven’t been able to catch up in licensing,” Dimitrijevic said. “We have to set up a careful way to regulate it and have public input.”

A group of aldermen want to require data center developers apply for a special use permit through the Milwaukee Zoning Appeals Board, a process they say creates more transparency. Should this pass, large data center proposals would be subject to public hearings, and the Zoning Appeals Board can reject a plan based on public health concerns.

The moratorium will receive a public hearing in the next few weeks.

This article was updated to include new information.

Advertisement

Francesca Pica can be reached at fpica@usatodayco.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending