Connect with us

Milwaukee, WI

‘Top Chef: Wisconsin’ Episode 12 recap: On the final episode filmed in Wisconsin, the chefs get reflective

Published

on

‘Top Chef: Wisconsin’ Episode 12 recap: On the final episode filmed in Wisconsin, the chefs get reflective


play

Warning: Spoilers ahead for “Top Chef” Season 21, Episode 12, which aired June 5, 2024.     

Take a bow, Wisconsin. You’ve put on a good show. 

Advertisement

Twelve weeks after the chefs walked into the Top Chef Kitchen, four are leaving the state on their journey to the finals. It’s been a fun ride, and a blast to see so many familiar faces and places on the small screen.

Did you have a favorite “Top Chef” challenge set in Wisconsin? I adored the Indigenous cuisine challenge, had a blast watching the Famous Racing Sausages, and of course, I’ll always have a soft spot for the cheese festival, Restaurant Wars and fish boil challenges — all episode tapings I was lucky enough to attend. 

But Wisconsin’s time in the “Top Chef” spotlight wrapped up this week, with an Elimination Challenge that was less about the setting of the season and more about how the competition shaped the chefs along the way. 

And appropriately enough, a handful of Wisconsin chefs were in attendance to wish the contestants “bon voyage” as they head to the finals next week. Find the full list of them below, plus the final Milwaukee sites we see for the season. 

And just because “Top Chef” is leaving Wisconsin doesn’t mean these recaps are over. I’ll be here sharing the play-by-play during both episodes of the finals, until the season wraps on June 19.

Advertisement

What in MKE did we see?: The Milwaukee lakefront, the Milwaukee River, the Sixth Street Viaduct, Ristorante Bartolotta, Milwaukee Public Market, The Pfister Hotel, the ASQ Center, Harbor House, the Milwaukee Art Museum 

Celebrity sightings: Bartolotta Restaurants Owner/Co-Founder Paul Bartolotta, Bartolotta Restaurants Director of Catering Maria Bartolotta, Ristorante Bartolotta Executive Chef/General Manager Juan Urbieta, The Diplomat Chef/Owner Dane Baldwin, Birch Chef/Owner Kyle Knall, Wild Bearies Executive Chef/Founder Elena Terry, L’Etoile Chef/Owner Tory Miller, Food & Wine Editor-in-Chief Hunter Lewis, Three Brothers Restaurant Chef/General Manager Milunka Radicevic  

Where was the challenge set? Harbor House in Milwaukee 

How did Dan do? It was not his best showing. In fact, it was probably his worst. He absolutely bungled his steak-and-eggs Quickfire Challenge dish and was heavy-handed with smoke for his whitefish-centered Elimination Challenge dish. He landed in the bottom three … but, spoiler alert: He squeaked by to move on to the penultimate episode of “Top Chef.” 

Advertisement

Best Wisconsin-related quote: “Were you going with cheddar ‘cause I’m from Wisconsin? Working the judge?” —Paul Bartolotta 

During one of the last group gatherings of the season at the chefs’ residence, the final five reflected on their time in the competition, appreciating the feedback they’d received, the inspiration they’d take to their restaurants back home, and the tight bond they’d made over the season. 

“It’s cool to come here not knowing anybody and leaving with a bunch of new friends,” Dan said to the group. 

“And an uncle … or a grandpa,” Danny replied, joking. (One last “old man Dan” crack for the road.)

Soon the group would be whittled to four, and no matter how tight-knit they had become, friendship couldn’t get in the way of the competition. 

Advertisement

The Quickfire Challenge: A feast for the senses 

“Last Quickfire in Milwaukee, man. What are we doing today?” Dan asked his car-mates on their way to the Top Chef Kitchen. 

After they arrived, they got their answer with the help of Milwaukee chef and restaurateur Paul Bartolotta. For an episode about reflection, it was fitting he’d be there for the final episode taped in his city. Bartolotta was a major factor in bringing the show to Wisconsin, after all, and he appeared as a guest judge on the season’s first episode 12 weeks ago. 

Bartolotta helped reveal this week’s Quickfire Challenge, the blind taste-test challenge — a perennial favorite on “Top Chef,” and one where the chefs would attempt to identify 26 mystery ingredients while blindfolded. 

After the blindfold challenge, the chefs would then have to cook a dish in 30 minutes using only the ingredients they correctly identified, plus a limited pantry for support. 

Advertisement

The chef who guessed the most ingredients correctly would win $5,000. The chef with the best dish would receive $10,000. 

Each chef had five minutes to taste ingredients like anchovies, za’atar, okra, pork chops, quinoa, umeboshi, gooseberries, watermelon, flank steak and more. 

Should’ve been a cinch for these chefs’ refined palates, right? Well … sort of. 

“I have an incredible palate,” Dan said. “This should be pretty easy.” 

Smash-cut to every other chef correctly identifying rosemary while Dan whiffed by guessing oregano. 

Advertisement

But he wasn’t the worst. Technically, he was tied for the worst. After five minutes were up, he and Savannah both identified nine ingredients correctly. Danny was next with 13, followed by Laura’s 15. And Manny, who flew through the ingredients as he tasted, impressively identified 23 of the 26 mystery ingredients. 

He’d be able to use them all, if he wanted, in his Quickfire dish. But when it came time for Kish, Bartolotta, and judges Tom Colicchio and Gail Simmons to taste it, he failed to incorporate enough flavor in his salmon to impress them.

Even so, he fared better than Dan, who botched a sauce he’d tried to piece together from his short list of ingredients (you mean watermelon, kalamata olives, soy sauce and red wine vinegar didn’t work together?), then bailed and went with a steak and eggs dish (complete with egg shells for crunch) that he sheepishly served the judges, knowing he’d failed. 

“This was by far the worst thing I’ve probably ever made,” he said. 

But Savannah, who also had just nine ingredients, wowed with her stripped-down creation. She made a crispy fried pork chop with a faux Caesar dressing made with cheddar cheese in place of the traditional Parmesan. 

Advertisement

“Were you going with cheddar ‘cause I’m from Wisconsin? Working the judge?” Bartolotta asked with a smile.  

It worked. The judges loved her clever twist.  

“That belongs on a menu somewhere. It’s really good,” Colicchio said.  

The dish won Savannah the Quickfire Challenge — her third in a row — and brought her total cash winnings to $38,000. 

Advertisement

The Elimination Challenge Reveal: A wealth of wisdom learned in Wisconsin 

“OK, chefs, who’s ready to take a walk down memory lane?” Kish asked. 

For the final Elimination Challenge set in Wisconsin, the chefs would need to create a dish that reflected the growth they’ve made here over 12 episodes. 

No other parameters were placed on the chefs, who would have $150 to spend at the Milwaukee Public Market and $200 at Whole Foods Market to create a dish for 10 judges dining at Harbor House, Bartolotta’s restaurant on the shore of Lake Michigan in downtown Milwaukee. 

But before the chefs went shopping, Bartolotta treated them to dinner at another one of his area restaurants: Ristorante Bartolotta, which celebrated its 30th year as “Top Chef” was filming in Wisconsin last summer. 

“You feel the love in that space. It’s a special place,” Dan said of the Italian restaurant located in Wauwatosa. 

Advertisement

“Top Chef” showed it off nicely, with loads of lingering shots of the restaurant’s dishes piling up on the table. Maria Bartolotta, Paul’s sister and the restaurant group’s director of catering, met the chefs and judges, and each dish was presented table-side by Executive Chef Juan Urbieta.  

While dining, the chefs reflected on their time on the show and the growth they experienced, while Bartolotta and Kish offered advice about changing and challenging yourself as you develop as a chef. 

“For me, the biggest lesson on ‘Top Chef’ was knowing that I was good enough and that I could trust myself,” Kish said. “And that will change the way you cook.” 

Solid advice at this stage in the game from a “Top Chef” winner. 

Advertisement

The Elimination Challenge: A season of change at Milwaukee’s Harbor House 

Visits to the Milwaukee Public Market (including stops at The Spice House, the West Allis Cheese & Sausage Shoppe and St. Paul Fish Company) and Whole Foods Market helped shape the chefs’ stories for this last Wisconsin-based cook. 

Manny planned a fish dish he felt comfortable with (yet again…), hoping to redeem himself after a poor showing at the fish boil two weeks prior. Danny and Laura both aimed to show restraint in their dishes after going overboard in the past. Dan and Savannah were still trying to find their stories while shopping, but the absence of fresh lemongrass at Whole Foods meant Dan’s story would need to shapeshift a bit — he’d have to rely on turmeric-lemongrass paste to build the sauce he’d planned. 

When the chefs arrived at Harbor House, Savannah’s storyline took shape. She planned to make a potato pavé in three hours — a dish that typically needs to be pressed overnight to work successfully. But coming off her hot streak, she was confident she could pull it off. 

Everyone seemed confident for such a high-pressure cook. Danny danced up a storm in the kitchen, Manny felt good about his red snapper, Dan was loving his improvised sauce, Laura was happy to bring a taste of her Mexican heritage into her Mediterranean dish. 

They’d be serving their dishes to a number of Wisconsin chefs we’ve seen guest judge in previous episodes: Bartolotta, Baldwin, Knall, Terry and Miller. They were joined by the three judges as well as Lewis and Radicevic. 

Advertisement

First up was Savannah and her shortcut potato pavé served with burnt onion and cherry jam with a chicken sauce reduction. She explained that the heat and pressure are all that’s needed to make a potato pavé, just like how the heat and pressure of the competition were all she needed to bring out her confidence. 

The judges were all smiles, impressed by her articulate storyline and just as impressed that she managed to pull off an impressive pavé in such a short amount of time. 

“I love a potato pavé and I love it even more now that Savannah told us why she made a potato pavé,” Kish said. 

But they weren’t as impressed with Manny’s dish, a snapper a la Veracruzano with creamy potatoes and saltines. He’d said he wanted to show off his roots and honor the cuisine of his Mexican ancestry — a beautiful homage, for sure, but one that had nothing to do with his journey or time spent in Wisconsin, as Knall pointed out. 

It was a through line in much of the season for Manny, who often leaned on the same style of dishes (meat, sauce, vegetable) to present each week.

Advertisement

But more egregious were the three completely raw servings of fish. Bartolotta said his was cooked perfectly, which Colicchio raised his eyebrows at. Manny’s dish was inconsistent around the table, and raw fish — not undercooked — is a major no-no. 

Danny’s dish was meant to be a redemption of the lackluster buckwheat tea he’d created during Restaurant Wars. This time around, he made a soba cha mushroom broth with mushroom puree and cod, a dish he called “subtle” with “nuanced flavors,” which shocked the judges. 

“You think this is subtle?” Simmons asked. 

They thought the mushroom flavors were bold, so much so that the cod was completely lost in the dish, according to Radicevic. And Kish pointed out that if Danny was going for redemption, he needed to bring his tea concept to the forefront of the dish. 

Advertisement

Dan struggled finding his story as he cooked (“I feel like I’m forcing square pegs into round holes,” he said), and a misfire in the kitchen certainly didn’t help. Time got away from him and he let his whitefish smoke for longer than he’d planned. 

He served his dish anyway: smoked walleye and potato dumplings with lemongrass, turmeric and brown butter emulsion. 

“The backbone of this dish is all about Wisconsin,” he said. 

That might have been true, but there was a lot going on with it. Kish said all she could taste was smoke while Terry said it felt heavy. Lewis called it “absolute maximalist” while Colicchio said it suffered from an “identity crisis.” 

There were decent flavors there, they said, but it was a lot to take on, with Simmons summing it up by saying the “story and the dish were muddled.” 

Advertisement

But things ended on a high note with Laura’s lamb manti (a Turkish dumpling) with barbacoa sauce, a simplified (for her) dish that showed she’d gained focus as the competition went on. 

The judges had googly eyes for the stunning dish from the start. 

“The dumpling pasta is pure love,” Lewis said. 

Kish said the technicality of the dish was difficult to ignore and the plating was beautiful before thanking the guest judges for joining them throughout the season in Wisconsin. 

“We’re wrapping up our time here in Wisconsin and I just wanted to take the time to say thank you to the pillars of the community for welcoming us, for teaching us about your beautiful state and sharing all your time and talents,” Kish said to the table of guest judges. 

Advertisement

But the pleasantries wouldn’t last. It was time to select a final four. 

Who won ‘Top Chef: Wisconsin’ Episode 12? 

Back in the Top Chef Kitchen, Bartolotta and Lewis joined the judges’ table and wasted no time revealing the week’s top dish. 

“The winning chef today told a wonderful story and also executed a dish with precision,” Lewis said, before Bartolotta announced that Savannah’s hot streak would continue. 

“I’m so stoked,” Savannah said as she fought back tears upon learning she was this week’s winner. She’ll have an advantage going into next week’s finals challenge. 

Advertisement

“You had a beginning and an end and it was all right there,” Colicchio said of her story and dish. 

“Pavé in that amount of time? What were you thinking?” Bartolotta asked, smiling. “And yet, boom, you nailed it.” 

“I feel like I’m the one to beat here,” Savannah said. “I’m realizing it, and I think other people are, too.” 

Who was sent home on ‘Top Chef: Wisconsin’ Episode 12? 

Before revealing the bottom three dishes of the week, Kish announced Laura would be joining Savannah in the final four, her focused dish proving she’d grown from throwing together all the ingredients she could find.

Advertisement

That meant Danny, Dan and Manny had the least-favorite dishes. Danny’s was incongruent with his storyline of subtlety. Dan used too much smoke and his dish didn’t show growth from the stellar smoked walleye dish he’d won with at Restaurant Wars. Manny’s raw fish was unacceptable and the overall dish didn’t reflect what he’d learned in the competition. 

As the judges deliberated, it was a toss-up between Manny and Dan, especially considering Dan’s exceptionally poor Quickfire dish (it was “actually terrible,” Simmons said). 

But the judges couldn’t overlook the raw fish, which brought Manny’s journey on “Top Chef” to an end. 

“I served raw fish on ‘Top Chef.’ I’m taking ownership of what I did wrong,” he said. “Being part of ‘Top Chef’ has changed me as a person and as a chef. I cannot put it in words. You just feel it.” 

His and the rest of the chefs’ time in Wisconsin would end. But the top four — Dan, Danny, Laura and Savannah — still have a journey ahead of them. 

Advertisement

They’ll go home for a few weeks, then get together again for the first of two finals episodes, which will take place on a Caribbean cruise in Curaçao, a Dutch Caribbean island just north of Venezuela.  

Next week, in Curaçao, one chef will be eliminated, with three moving on to the final challenge to compete for the title of Top Chef.  

How to watch ‘Top Chef: Wisconsin’: TV channel, streaming    

Viewers can watch live on Bravo on Wednesday nights at 8 p.m. or stream the next day on Peacock, BravoTV.com or the Bravo app. 



Source link

Advertisement

Milwaukee, WI

New book documents Violent Femmes’ rise to fame from Milwaukee roots

Published

on

New book documents Violent Femmes’ rise to fame from Milwaukee roots


Before the Violent Femmes became a world-famous band with a multi-platinum record, they started the same way any other group would in Milwaukee: playing wherever they could.

Local clubs weren’t interested in their unique musical style, so they took to playing on sidewalks and street corners until they were first discovered while performing outside of a Pretenders concert at the Oriental Theater in 1981.

They self-funded their first album, which went on to sell more than 7 million copies.

Understanding Wisconsin, Together.

WPR’s “Wisconsin Today” newsletter keeps you connected to the state you love without feeling overwhelmed. No paywall. No agenda. No corporate filter.

Advertisement

The story of the Violent Femmes’ Milwaukee origins and improbable rise to fame is the subject of a new book in the long-running music book series called “33⅓.” 

Author Nic Brown joined WPR’s “Wisconsin Today” to share the significance of the band’s self-titled debut album and what he learned from interviewing band members and producers.

The following was edited for clarity and brevity.

Advertisement

Rob Ferrett: For people who aren’t familiar with the Violent Femmes, how would you describe their music?

Nic Brown: They occupy this overlapping realm of folk, punk and jazz — which I’d call a Bermuda Triangle for anybody, but they pull it off because their songs are so great. Gordon Gano, the primary singer-songwriter, had this incredible collection of songs when the band formed, and they’re so well put together that they could have worked in any setting, really.

The Violent Femmes themselves had one of the most unique arrangements of instruments possible, and that’s the biggest surprise for people when they see them. A lot of what’s most unusual about them is often invisible on a recording, but they’re a one-of-a-kind band. Their debut record is a one-of-a-kind record. It didn’t sound like anything else then, and it still doesn’t sound like anything else today. 

RF: What were their early public performances like?

NB: They had a hard time getting gigs. They busked, and they had instrumentation that made it easy for them to do that, and that was by design, too. Victor DeLorenzo, the drummer, played standing up with brushes, with just a snare drum and then what he calls a tranceaphone, which is a metal bushel basket placed on top of another drum. Gordon (Gano) would play guitar on the street, usually an acoustic guitar. And then Brian Ritchie would play an acoustic bass guitar, which to most people sounds like stand-up bass, like what you’d see in a jazz trio. It looked more like a mariachi-style bass, and Brian’s point was, he couldn’t haul a stand-up bass around. He didn’t even have a driver’s license. 

Advertisement

They had instruments that were made to play on the street, and the fact that they spent so much time playing on the street is part of the reason the band works so well. There are few performance spaces less forgiving than a street corner in Milwaukee, or anywhere. They honed this act on the street corners so that they could make their songs work in that setting. And because of that, when they finally got into the studio to record their debut album, they were a really well-oiled machine, despite the fact they hadn’t spent much time on actual stages.

Gordon Gano (left), Brian Ritchie (right) and The Violent Femmes performs at The Sasquatch! Music Festival at the Gorge Amphitheatre on Saturday, May 24, 2014, in George, Washington. John Davisson/Invision/AP

RF: What was it like for them to try to get a record deal and record their first album?

NB: It was failure after failure, really. They tried to get a record deal before they went into the studio. They had one very small label out of New York that was interested, but that fell through, so that’s why they eventually recorded it themselves. They had a lot of pressure from some people who did recognize a spark there to do that ’80s rock ‘n’ roll production with the more processed sound and synthesizers, and they had a surprising amount of confidence at the age that they were at to stick with their sound.

Eventually, there was a label called Slash Records, a small punk label in California, and they turned the band down. But two employees at Slash loved this recording so much that they kept playing the cassette in the offices until the owner finally said, “OK, I can’t take it anymore. I’m going to sign this band, not because I want to, but because I’m so sick of hearing my employees playing it every day.” So that’s how they ended up getting their record deal with Slash Records.

They say it’s the worst record deal any band could ever have signed. But they did what they had to, the record came out, and the rest is history, right?

Advertisement

RF: It took four years before the album went gold and then another four years to go platinum. How did it pick up popularity and go viral in the pre-internet era?

NB: I describe it as going viral over eight years via cassette. Young people connected with the songs and shared dubbed cassette tapes. They say this album has sold 7 million copies, and I say you need to ask Maxwell how many blank tapes they sold between 1983 and 1991 and add in about 30 percent of that.

A lot of people don’t know what the album cover looks like. I had a guy recently tell me that the album cover is whatever guy’s handwriting wrote “Violent Femmes” on the blank tape, so it was a real organic word-of-mouth build-up over eight years. 

A young girl in a white dress peers through a weathered, partially open door of an old building. The words violent femmes appear in the top left corner.

RF: How unique was Brian Ritchie’s bass playing in what you described as a “lead bass” role in the band?

NB: This is probably the most bass-forward recording in popular music history. Brian Ritchie is an incredible musician, and so this thing happens on these songs where the melodic statements that aren’t happening with Gordon’s vocals are usually made on the bass guitar, and then Brian Ritchie takes long bass solos, unaccompanied by any other instrument.

They sound so natural and great that you actually don’t even think they’re bass solos. Often, if there’s a bass solo happening, that’s when we might skip the song. I’m sorry to say, but that doesn’t apply to Brian Ritchie’s work. He’s the lead.

Advertisement

RF: As a musician yourself, what drew you so enthusiastically into writing this book? 

NB: The book series that it’s part of, “33⅓,” is just a classic series, and guys like me were always dreaming about what record I would pitch to write about. This album had always been in my head as that record. I published a memoir about three years ago about my career as a musician, and in it I mentioned how important this album was. 

One of the members of the Femmes management read that memoir and actually reached out to me about maybe doing a project with them at some point. So this simmering dream of mine to pitch a “33⅓” book rose to the surface, and I thought, I’m gonna go for it. It was sort of a double-dream for me to have a book in the series and to be able to write it with the participation of all three members and the producer. It’s a fan’s dream come true.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Milwaukee, WI

Auburn baseball vs Milwaukee regional championship: Time, TV, how to watch

Published

on

Auburn baseball vs Milwaukee regional championship: Time, TV, how to watch


AUBURN — It’s tough enough to win an NCAA regional championship, and considering the circumstance Auburn baseball put itself in, it’s rather miraculous the Tigers will be playing for one on Monday, June 1 (5 p.m. CT, TBA).

The fourth overall seed in this year’s NCAA Tournament, Auburn dropped its regional-opener four days prior, losing to 4-seed Milwaukee and tasked with working itself out of the field’s elimination bracket.

Since then, Auburn’s rattled off three-straight victories, sending 3-seed NC State and 2-seed UCF packing before besting the Panthers in a rematch that started late Sunday and didn’t end until the early hours of Monday morning.

Advertisement

It’ll wind up being a three-game set between the Tigers and Panthers, who go to battle one last time in a winner-take-all contest, with a super regional berth on the line.

BUY TICKETS FOR AUBURN BASEBALL’S NCAA REGIONAL HERE

Here’s everything you need to tune into Auburn’s upcoming contest, including viewing options and more:

How to watch Auburn baseball vs Milwaukkee today: TV, streaming

STREAM AUBURN BASEBALL HERE

It’s not yet known where, or if, Auburn’s NCAA regional championship will be nationally televised, but it’ll stream on ESPN+, which can be accessed with an ESPN subscription.

Advertisement

Mark Neely and former Auburn pitcher Gregg Olson are expected to be on the call, handling play-by-play and color commentator duties, respectively.

Listen live to Auburn baseball vs Milwaukee on the radio

Today’s game will be broadcast live on WMSP-AM (740) in Montgomery and WGZZ-FM (94.3) in Auburn. The radio call can also be streamed online. Andy Burcham and Brad Law are expected to be on the call.

When does Auburn baseball play Milwaukee today? First-pitch time, probable starters for NCAA regional

  • Time: 5 p.m. CT
  • Date: Monday, June 1
  • Location: Plainsman Park (Auburn)

Here’s who the Tigers and Panthers will have toeing the rubber:

  • Auburn: TBA
  • Milwaukee: TBA

Auburn baseball’s 2026 schedule: Results, times, how to watch

Date(s) (Times) Opponent Results TV (Streaming)
Feb. 13-15 (5:30, 6, 2 p.m.) Youngstown State G1: 2-1, AU; G2: 2-1, AU (10); G3: 17-2 AU (7) N/A (SECN+)
Feb. 17 (6 p.m.) Cincinnati 8-0, Cincinnati N/A (SECN+)
Feb. 20 (7 p.m.) Kansas State* 5-1, Auburn N/A (FloSports)
Feb. 21 (3 p.m.) No. 14 Florida State* 8-5, Auburn N/A (FloSports)
Feb. 22 (10:30 a.m.) No. 11 Louisville* 10-3, Auburn N/A (FloSports)
Feb. 25 (6 p.m.) West Georgia 4-3, Auburn N/A (SECN+)
Feb. 27 – March 1 (6, 2, 1 p.m.) Nebraska G1: 9-8, NU (10); G2: 15-4, AU (7); G3: 12-3, AU N/A (SECN+)
March 3 (6 p.m.) Samford 6-2, Auburn N/A (SECN+)
March 6-8 (6, 6, 1 p.m.) Winthrop G1: 10-0, AU (7); G2: 6-0, AU; G3: 8-1, AU N/A (SECN+)
March 10 (6 p.m.) UAB 17-2, Auburn (7) N/A (SECN+)
March 13-15 (6, 4, 1 p.m.) at Missouri G1: 2-0, AU; G2: 4-3, AU (10); G3: 9-2, AU N/A (SECN+)
March 17 (4 p.m.) No. 3 Georgia Tech 9-2, Auburn N/A (SECN+)
March 20-22 (6, 6, 2 p.m.) No. 2 Texas G1: 4-3, AU; G2: 7-6, UT; G3: 5-0, UT N/A (SECN+)
March 24 (6 p.m.) South Alabama* 10-0, Auburn (8) TBA
March 27-29 (6, 7, 1 p.m.) at No. 23 Alabama G1: 11-1, UA (8); G2: 3-2, UA; G3: 3-1, UA SECN (G1); (SECN+)
March 31 (6 p.m.) at No. 3 Georgia Tech 13-3, Georgia Tech (8) ESPN2
April 2-4 (6, 6, 2 p.m.) No. 16 Arkansas G1: 10-2, AU; G2: 3-2, ARK; G3: 8-3, AU ESPN2 (SECN+)
April 7 (6 p.m.) Jacksonville State 15-4, JSU (8) N/A (SECN+)
April 10-12 (6, 7, 2 p.m.) Kentucky G1: 12-5, AU; G2: 5-4, UK; G3: 11-0, AU (7) SECN (G2, G3); (SECN+)
April 14 (6 p.m.) Alabama State 13-0, Auburn (7) N/A (SECN+)
April 16-18 (6, 4:30 p.m., 11 a.m.) at No. 18 Florida G1: 6-3, UF; G2: 5-3, AU; G3: 8-5, AU SECN (G1, G2), ESPN2 (G3); (SECN+)
April 21 (6 p.m.) at Samford 14-2, Auburn (7) TBA
April 24-26 (6, 6, 2 p.m.) No. 13 Oklahoma G1: 6-4, AU; G2: 2-1, OU; G3: 14-4, AU (8) N/A (SECN+)
May 1-3 (7, 2, 1 p.m.) at No. 7 Texas A&M G1: 18-5, AU (7); G2: 5-4, AU; G3: 4-3, A&M SECN (G1); (SECN+)
May 5 (6 p.m.) at UAB 10-2, Auburn TBA
May 7-9 (7, 7:30, 3 p.m.) at No. 16 Mississippi State G1: 10-3, MSU; G2: 5-4, AU; G3: 13-2, AU (7) ESPNU (G1), SECN (G2, G3); (SECN+)
May 12 (6 p.m.) at No. 25 Jacksonville State 4-1, Jacksonville State TBA
May 14-16 (6, 6, 2 p.m.) No. 4 Georgia G1: 2-1, UGA; G2: 9-7, UGA; G3: 14-4, AU (8) N/A (SECN+)
May 20 (8 p.m.) (14) LSU^ 3-1, Auburn SECN (SECN+)
May 22 (8:25 p.m.) (3) Texas A&M^ 7-0, Auburn SECN (SECN+)
May 23 (4 p.m.) (7) Arkansas^ 2-1, Arkansas SECN (SECN+)
May 29 (Noon) (4) Milwaukee% 13-8, Milwaukee N/A (ESPN+)
May 30 (2 p.m.) (3) NC State% 17-13, Auburn ESPN (ESPN+)
May 31 (2 p.m.) (2) UCF% 9-3, Auburn ESPN2 (ESPN+)
May 31 (10:10 p.m.) (4) Milwaukee% 9-1, Auburn N/A (ESPN+)
June 1 (5 p.m.) (4) Milwaukee% TBA (ESPN+)
Record: 41-20 (17-13 SEC)
All times central. Asterisks denote neutral-site contest. ^ denotes SEC Tournament. % denotes NCAA regional.

Adam Cole is the Auburn athletics beat writer for the Montgomery Advertiser. He can be reached via email at acole@gannett.com or on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, @colereporter. To support Adam’s work, please subscribe to the Montgomery Advertiser.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Milwaukee, WI

Milwaukee Panthers Putting Together a Great Run in the NCAA Tournament – World Baseball Network

Published

on

Milwaukee Panthers Putting Together a Great Run in the NCAA Tournament – World Baseball Network


The Milwaukee Panthers are in the driver’s seat in the NCAA Tournament’s Auburn regional. The Panthers have two wins over the Auburn Tigers and UCF Knights and made it to the regional final.

The Panthers are looking to make it to their first super regional in program history.

From a rocky start to a red-hot Horizon League Tournament run

Milwaukee did not have a smooth start to the 2026 college baseball season. The Panthers were 5-22 overall on April 3 and had an uphill battle to climb to end the season.

From April 3 to the end of the regular season, Milwaukee went 17-9. However, they still had a below-average overall record of 22-31. The Panthers needed to win the Horizon League Tournament to make it into the NCAA Tournament as an automatic bid.

Advertisement

The Panthers posted a solid conference record of 14-10 in 2026. This gave them the number two seed in the Horizon League Tournament, which was played at Nischwitz Stadium in Dayton, Ohio.

Milwaukee defeated Northern Kentucky and the tournament host, Wright State, twice to win the tournament title. They outscored their opponents 23-7 across those three games. The 2026 Horizon League Tournament title is the first conference tournament title for the Panthers since 2010.

Milwaukee’s wins over Auburn and UCF

An automatic bid placed Milwaukee as the fourth seed in the Auburn regional. The Panthers faced off against the Tigers on Friday, May 29.

Milwaukee got off to a huge, early lead on Auburn. Heading into the bottom of the fourth inning, the Panthers had a 10-0 lead on the Tigers. Milwaukee would go on to win 13-8.

Joey Spence, John Hadley VI, and Grant Ross led Milwaukee offensively with three hits apiece. Spence had two doubles in the game and an RBI. Hadley VI had a double and a triple against Auburn.

Advertisement

Charlie Marion and Bradyn Horn both had three-run home runs early on in the game that were huge for the Panthers. Those home runs allowed them to gain a big 10-0 lead early.

The magic did not stop on Friday for Milwaukee. On Saturday, May 30, the Panthers defeated the UCF Knights in the “1-0” game by a score of 13-6.

Ross continued his big performance in the regional. After a three-hit game against Auburn, the Milwaukee third baseman hit a home run and a double against UCF. He finished the game with two hits, three RBIs, and five runs scored.

Marion finished with a multi-hit game against the Knights. Milwaukee’s center fielder, Dylan O’Connell, had two doubles in the game that led to four RBIs.

Up next for Milwaukee

The Milwaukee Panthers will play the winner of the game between Auburn and UCF in the Auburn regional final on Sunday, May 31.

Advertisement

The Auburn-UCF elimination game is at 3 p.m. ET at Plainsman Park, and the game can be watched on ESPN2. Milwaukee’s game against the winner will be at 8 p.m. ET. That game will be on ESPN+.


WBN NCAA: https://worldbaseball.com/league/ncaa/

 

PHOTO: Via Dominic Kibler on Instagram (@dominic.kibler)

 

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending