Michigan
Rick Haglund: Michigan needs to face facts in boosting population and economic competitiveness ⋆ Michigan Advance
Foundation and other philanthropy executives aren’t generally known as firebrands. But veteran foundation leader David Egner recently served up a scorching assessment of Michigan’s protracted economic decline and why it happened.
“All indicators are that other states like Wisconsin and Ohio are surpassing Michigan on a number of measures,” Egner said in a recent webinar. “Our ability to stay competitive in comparison to other states is in serious jeopardy. Unfortunately, it’s becoming more attractive to live in other places than it is in our beloved Michigan.”
Egner, who heads the Ralph C. Wilson Foundation in Detroit, continued, “Michigan’s “challenges are complex. They’re not simple, and they result from years of ignoring the facts. In many respects we’re victims of our own success; 75 to 100 years of unparalleled economic success.
“And as conditions changed, we sought to protect our position instead of adjusting to the circumstances,” he continued. “Then we blamed others for our fall. And we stubbornly called for a return to the glory days by repeating the actions that stopped working. And that’s how we’ve spent the last few decades.”
Egner’s harsh assessment of Michigan’s competitive position came in an online discussion about one of the most comprehensive studies of the state’s standing in recent memory, produced by the nonpartisan Citizens Research Council of Michigan and Altarum, an Ann Arbor-based research group.
“Michigan’s Path to a Prosperous Future: Challenges and Opportunities” is a five-part series of reports on Michigan’s demographics, economy and workforce, infrastructure, environment and public services.
Egner didn’t cite specifics, but they’re not much of a mystery to those of us who have lived in Michigan for a few decades.
We’ve stubbornly clung to the hope that we can somehow recreate a 1960s manufacturing economy by subsidizing new factories, while other, more successful states have adapted to an increasingly knowledge-based, services economy.
That’s not to say manufacturing is no longer important — it is — and United Auto Workers-represented workers recently achieved gains in a new labor contract with Detroit automakers that will restore a middle-class lifestyle for many of them.
But it’s unlikely that manufacturing will again employ nearly 1 million workers, as it did more than 30 years ago. Currently, there are about 600,000 manufacturing workers in the state, only about 14% of the state’s total employment.
Meanwhile, we’ve ignored or short-changed investments in the things other states have done to grow their populations and economies, including improving K-12 education, building transit and making communities more attractive to new residents.
During the past 30 years of mostly Republican control of the Legislature and governor’s office, tax cuts and improving the business climate were the centerpieces of Michigan’s efforts to grow jobs and population.
Those policymakers were successful in the first part of the equation. Michigan residents benefit from the fifth-lowest state and local tax burden in the country, according to the conservative Tax Foundation.
But being a low-tax state hasn’t prompted people to flock here or boosted incomes of its residents above those living in competing states.
Michigan’s population has been stuck at about 10 million people for more than 20 years. And the state has fallen from 11th in the country in personal per capita income in 1950 to 39th last year, according to the CRC/Altarum study and census data.
Michigan’s low-tax strategy “has not been a winning proposition,” said CRC President Eric Lupher.
Yet some continue to believe that more tax cuts are the path to a larger population and increased prosperity.
The West Michigan Policy Forum, a group of West Michigan business leaders, has proposed eliminating the personal income tax to boost the state’s population. And a group called “AxMITax” is trying to put a measure on the November 2024 ballot that would abolish all property taxes in the state.
What’s that cliché about doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result?
Michigan instead needs to take difficult, and likely unpopular steps to grow and restore its economic fortunes.
What’s that cliché about doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result?
There are a lot of troubling trends in Michigan’s population demographics. Too many young people are leaving the state, which is getting older and less able to support the state’s economy.
In 2020, there were 4.5 working-age people per retiree in that state. Over the next 12 years, the ratio is expected to fall to 2.5, according to the CRC/Altarum study.
But there is some good news, should we choose to see it as that. The one component of the state’s population that is growing is international immigration, projected to add 22,000 people through 2050. Michigan can build on that growth by becoming a more welcoming state.
Policymakers, in promoting growth policies, must deal with the fact that Michigan is becoming more diverse and regard it as a positive. By 2050, 40% of the state’s working population will be people of color, according to the CRC/Altarum study.
“Now is the time to be relentlessly inclusive,” said Javon Dobbs, communications manager at the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, who is African American and adds he’s seen too many of his college friends and family leave Michigan for better opportunities and an improved quality of life.
And state leaders need to face reality in crafting a new approach to revitalize the state, Egner said.
“Until we can build a coalition that actually believes and accepts the facts and realities of where Michigan is, we won’t be able to build solutions that work,” he said.
Michigan
WATCH: Ohio State trolls Michigan with halftime show
Michigan and Ohio State won’t meet on the football field for another few weeks, but it’s never too early to troll your biggest rival. During Saturday’s matchup against Purdue, Ohio State’s marching band used its halftime performance as an opportunity to take a shot at ‘that team up north.’
The theme of the halftime show was “A Day At The Zoo”, and the band formed into various animals throughout the performance. Another part of the performance included the Michigan block M flag making an appearance, in which the animal formations would do everything from stomp on it to…well…you’ll see.
The last time the two heated rivals clashed in Columbus, there was also a notable moment relating to Michigan’s block M flag – and it was the moment that Mike Sainristil planted it on the 50-yard line after the Wolverines bullied the Buckeyes 45-23.
Although Michigan has had the upper hand in the rivalry over the last three seasons, there’s no question that the circumstances surrounding this year’s game feel much different. At 8-1, the Buckeyes have their sights set on playing for a conference championship and a shot at the national championship. On the other side, the Wolverines are still fighting to become bowl eligible with a brutal 5-5 record through 10 games.
– Enjoy more Michigan Wolverines coverage on Michigan Wolverines On SI –
Michigan
Indiana football quarterback Kurtis Rourke on thumb injury: ‘I feel back to 100%’
BLOOMINGTON — The only evidence of Indiana football quarterback Kurtis Rourke’s thumb injury was a bit of tape.
He ditched the splint and glove he wore against Michigan State in IU’s 20-15 win over Michigan on Saturday at Memorial Stadium.
Rourke underwent surgery on his throwing hand two weeks ago after breaking a bone in his right thumb. He made a quick recovery for the No. 8 Hoosiers (10-0; 7-0 Big Ten), but protected the thumb in his return to the lineup against MSU.
He didn’t wear anything on his throwing hand while preparing for the Wolverines. He felt some mild discomfort at the end of a full week of practice, but the rest he got during an off day on Friday had him feeling “100 percent.”
“I had no issues going into today,” Rourke said, after the game.
Indiana QB Kurtis Rourke and offense ‘near perfect’ in first half
Indiana looked like it was going to cruise to another double-digit victory on Saturday when it jumped out to a 17-3 lead with Rourke going 14 of 18 for 190 yards with two touchdowns.
“We were going against a really good defense, that first half we had to be near perfect,” Rourke said. “Made some good reads, big catches and big runs.”
With Michigan starter corner Will Johnson sidelined with an injury, Indiana leaned on the deep ball starting with Rourke’s 26-yard gain in the first quarter to Ke’Shawn Williams along the sideline to get into the red zone.
The Ohio transfer had the tiniest of windows to deliver the ball and Williams made a great individual effort by getting his feet down inbounds after making the leaping two-handed grab.
Rourke throwing a back-shoulder throw to Omar Cooper Jr. for a touchdown two plays later to give Indiana a 7-3 lead.
He extended that advantage with a 36-yard touchdown pass to Elijah Sarratt with 12:10 to go in the second quarter. Rourke didn’t flinch with Michigan’s All-American defensive tackle Mason Graham bearing down on him in the pocket and delivered one of his prettiest throws of the season to Sarratt on a pass that traveled more than 45 yards in the air.
Rourke closed out the half 3 of 4 on passes of 20-yards or more.
Indiana’s offense shows ‘good resolve’ despite struggles
The consensus after the game was that IU’s offense was just out of sync in the second half.
Michigan didn’t make any wholesale changes at halftime and didn’t do anything the Hoosiers hadn’t seen on film, but nothing seemed to work.
“For a while there, we had a hard time gaining three yards on offense.” Cignetti said.
On IU’s first offensive snap of the second half, Rourke threw the ball right into the hands of Michigan defensive back Zeke Berry at his own 7-yard line. It was only his fourth interception of the season, but the turnover acted as a wake up call for the Wolverines.
They forced three straight punts after that.
“The interception was a bad way to start, and then we had some protection issues, and then we had some opportunities, plays that we normally make, maybe a one-on-one go ball or back-shoulder throw, we fake the bubble and Sarratt down the sideline just can’t quite connect,” Cignetti said. “We had a number of those. And then the sacks. We couldn’t get anything going in the run game. It just wasn’t happening.”
Indiana finished with 10 total yards of offense in the second half and were held to less than 250 yards for the first time since visiting Ann Arbor last year, but no one panicked.
“I thought we did a really good job,” Cignetti said. “The offense is used to clicking and scoring a lot of points. I thought everybody had good resolve. We stepped up as a team and found a different way to win.”
The offense managed some critical first downs with the game on the line.
Rourke connected with Williams again late in the second half to put IU in field goal range — Nicolas Radicic hit a 41-yarder with 2:34 to go — and he ran the ball for a first down in the final minutes to prevent Michigan from getting the ball back.
“These are games that really test you as a team,” Rourke said. “We knew eventually we’d come to a game that it would be close and we’d have to see what we are made of. Really proud of how we handled it.”
Michael Niziolek is the Indiana beat reporter for The Bloomington Herald-Times. You can follow him on X @michaelniziolek and read all his coverage by clicking here.
Michigan
COLUMN: Even if he lands Bryce Underwood, can Sherrone Moore lead Michigan Football back to success?
Replacing Jim Harbaugh was always going to be a next-to-impossible task for the University of Michigan.
Harbaugh has won at every coaching stop he’s been. He led Stanford to a AP Top 5 finish, the San Francisco 49ers to three straight NFC Championship Games and a Super Bowl appearances, and the Wolverines to an average of 10.5 wins per full season, three straight Big Ten titles and a national championship. Harbaugh is one of the very best coaches at any level of football, and you don’t just replace a guy like that.
Particularly, with a guy who’s never been a head coach before.
Even before Harbaugh ultimately made the decision to return to the NFL, I had serious misgivings over Michigan’s perceived plan to promote then-offensive coordinator Sherrone Moore from within the program to replace its star head coach. Fresh off a national championship, the Michigan job should have been one of the most coveted in the country (even with all the NCAA uncertainty surrounding the program). Was a first-time head coach really the best decision?
Some of those concerns were alleviated when I heard different national college football analysts like Joel Klatt proclaim their belief that Moore was the right fit for Michigan to continue what Harbaugh had built in Ann Arbor. Fast forward 10 games into Moore’s tenure as head coach, as the Wolverines’ fall to 5-5 with Saturday’s 20-15 loss to undefeated Indiana, all of those doubts and then some have returned over Michigan’s direction as a football program.
Yes, Michigan lost a ton of outstanding players to the NFL this offseason. Yes, Harbaugh gutted the Wolverines’ coaching staff, and his late decision to depart hamstrung Michigan’s ability to add talent out of the transfer portal, particularly at quarterback. With that understood, Moore and the staff he hired at Michigan have still underachieved with the talent they do have in Schembechler Hall.
Michigan’s defense played inspired in the second half against the No. 8 Hoosiers, shutting down Indiana’s high-powered offense with a dominant run defense, a relentless pass rush and strong coverage on the back end. But, that half has been the exception this season.
Defensive coordinator Wink Martindale may be the “O.G.” of the defensive system Mike Macdonald and Jesse Minter run to great success in Ann Arbor, but the two young bucks clearly surpassed their mentor (Martindale) in their abilities to stifle opposing offenses. More often than not, Martindale has made head-scratching decisions in how he’s used NFL-ready talent like Mason Graham and others. And Martindale has mostly come up short in adjusting to young personnel who aren’t ready to execute an NFL-style system.
On the other side of the ball, offensive coordinator Kirk Campbell has been a dreadful play-caller throughout the year for the Wolverines. The quarterbacks coach has routinely stunted Michigan’s momentum with the Alex Orji packages, and/or has been inconceivably predictable and unwilling to break tendency while calling a game. Sure, not having a Power 4 level quarterback is limiting for any offensive coordinator, but Campbell has done nothing to make things easier for Davis Warren or Orji out there.
There’s one thing Moore and his staff have done very well this season — recruit. Michigan’s 2025 recruiting class ranks No. 11 in the country, and is a Top 10 haul based on average prospect rating. Moore has also found a way to unlock more of Michigan’s NIL potential, with boosters like Barstool Sports’ Dave Portnoy being willing to open their wallets in an attempt to flip five-star quarterback Bryce Underwood, among others.
Here’s the concern though: Even if Michigan flips Underwood from LSU, and/or lands a Top 10-caliber class in this cycle, can this staff be trusted to coach and develop that class to the level needed to compete for championships again?
Nothing Michigan’s staff has done this season suggests so.
Defensive backs coach LaMar Morgan is a great example of this duality on U-M’s staff. Morgan has landed big win after big win on the recruiting trail since being hired by Moore, but Michigan’s secondary has been inconsistent at best, and totally lost at worst, on the field for much of this season.
Michigan has gone from one of the most sure-tackling teams in the country to one that routinely misses tackles, in some of the biggest moments especially. That falls on the entire defensive coaching staff, whether it be the techniques being taught or the way this staff has practiced it throughout the season.
While the Wolverines played hard, battled and had themselves in position to knock off a Top 10 team against Indiana on Saturday, the same coaching shortcomings reared their ugly heads again, and some new ones have emerged as well.
Campbell’s playcalling was dreadful, particularly in the red zone. Moore made several questionable decisions, like okaying a run on 3rd-and-7, cutting the down and distance in half, but then choosing to take a delay-of-game and punt rather than going for it in Indiana territory.
How about the decision to not give Kalel Mullings — Michigan’s most effective rusher — a carry until the second quarter. Moore told CBS’ Jenny Dell at halftime that the Wolverines were “going with the hot hand” in Donovan Edwards and Benjamin Hall, despite the fact that Hall had only seven carries this season prior to today. Was Moore just giving Dell coach-speak to cover up another reason for Mullings absence? One would certainly hope, because not much else about that decision or the reason given makes a whole lot of sense.
Finally, after Michigan’s tackling issue reared its ugly head again on Indiana’s last possession, Moore looked like a deer in headlights while letting 28 seconds tick off the clock before calling the first of Michigan’s three timeouts. Sure, the Wolverines were likely cooked by that point, facing a 2nd-and-2 and needing a stop for any hope of getting one more possession, but Moore’s indecision cost Michigan nearly a half-minute.
Throughout this entire season, Moore has looked like a young head coach who’s in way over his head leading one of the most prominent programs in college football. In one offseason, this program has regressed back to the spot it was in before Harbaugh led an instant turnaround in Ann Arbor. Moore was hired with the goal of continuity, but this looks far more like Brady Hoke or Rich Rodriguez’s Michigan program than it does Harbaugh’s.
What the Wolverines’ have been able to do on the recruiting trail has brought some excitement and hope for the future under Moore, but the overall downgrade in coaching between the previous regime and this current one undermines much of that optimism.
Look, Michigan isn’t going to fire Sherrone Moore after just one season as head coach. While I understand that reality, I also believe it’s never too soon to correct a mistake, and I’ve never felt more strongly that promoting Moore from within after Harbaugh’s departure was a mistake. In my opinion, a proven head coach who can bring in a fresh, modern offensive identity is needed badly. There’s little indication that a move like that will be made this offseason, but based on what we’ve seen in 2024, it feels like a change in direction will be necessary in two or three years.
– Enjoy more Michigan Wolverines coverage on Michigan Wolverines On SI –
For additional coverage of University of Michigan athletics:
-
Business1 week ago
Carol Lombardini, studio negotiator during Hollywood strikes, to step down
-
Health1 week ago
Just Walking Can Help You Lose Weight: Try These Simple Fat-Burning Tips!
-
Business1 week ago
Hall of Fame won't get Freddie Freeman's grand slam ball, but Dodgers donate World Series memorabilia
-
Culture1 week ago
Yankees’ Gerrit Cole opts out of contract, per source: How New York could prevent him from testing free agency
-
Culture6 days ago
Try This Quiz on Books That Were Made Into Great Space Movies
-
Technology1 week ago
An Okta login bug bypassed checking passwords on some long usernames
-
Health3 days ago
Lose Weight Without the Gym? Try These Easy Lifestyle Hacks
-
Culture2 days ago
The NFL is heading to Germany – and the country has fallen for American football