Connect with us

World

Police, UK pm accused of double standard as suspect indicted for killing 3 girls faces terror related charge

Published

on

Police, UK pm accused of double standard as suspect indicted for killing 3 girls faces terror related charge

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

LONDON—The Merseyside police department in England was forced to admit last month that the force is “restricted” from sharing key information about the July Southport attack that killed three young girls at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class, as the alleged attacker now faces terror-related charges.

Axel Muganwa Rudakubana, 18, is facing the new charges under the country’s Terrorism Act in addition to the existing three murder charges, ten counts of attempted murder and one count of knife possession, authorities said last week. Rudakubana allegedly committed the July 29 stabbing spree that killed three girls – Alice Dasilva Aguiar, 9, Elsie Dot Stancombe, 7, and Bebe King, 6 – and injured several others.

Advertisement

The police said that the suspect produced the deadly poison ricin and had al Qaeda training materials titled “Military Studies in the Jihad Against the Tyrants: The al Qaeda Training Manual” during a search of the suspect’s property. The police have not declared the events a terror incident as no motive has been determined, authorities added.

UK STABBING SUSPECT IN DEATHS OF 3 GIRLS FOUND WITH RICIN, AL QAEDA MATERIAL AND CHARGED UNDER TERRORISM ACT

Bebe King, Elsie Dot Stancombe, Alice Dasilva Aguiar (left to right) were killed during a Taylor Swift-themed dance event. The teen suspect faces numerous charges related to the slaying.  (Merseyside Police)

“We have been given extensive guidance by the CPS [Crown Prosecution Service] in relation to what we can say publicly to ensure the integrity of the court proceedings are protected, and therefore we are restricted in what we can share with you now, whilst the proceedings are live,” Merseyside Police said in a statement to dispel the criticism that the force is “deciding to keep things from the public.”

These revelations of the terror-related charges ignited a firestorm over the police and government’s secretive and double-standard approach in the aftermath of the deadly attack in Southport, a town north of Liverpool, back in July.

Advertisement

“I think the rationale was that they didn‘t want to prejudice the trial. And I think motive will be an important issue in the trial, and they didn’t want to release information about the suspect that spoke to his motive,” said Toby Young, the director of the Free Speech Union in the U.K. told Fox News Digital.

But Young added that there was a “kind of double standard when it comes to the information that’s released about attackers in these circumstances,” as the government and authorities would likely have been more forthcoming if the attacker had been “a far-right white supremacist.”

Bonfire during a riot

Anti-immigration activists hold an ‘Enough is Enough’ protest on August 2, 2024, in Sunderland, England. After the murders of three girls in Southport earlier this week, misinformation spread via social media and fueled acts of violent rioting from far-right actors across England. While they prefer to be called ‘concerned parents’, their actions point to racial hatred with a particular focus on Islamophobia thus targeting mosques.  (Drik/Getty Images)

The killing spree led to widespread rioting across England amid speculation about the attacker’s background and the nature of the attack. In response, multiple individuals have been charged and jailed over comments made online that the court perceived as inciting the riots. 

Last month, Lucy Connolly, the wife of a local Conservative Party politician, was jailed for over 31 months after making what the authorities claimed were inflammatory posts on social media directed against asylum seekers. 

Wayne O’Rourke, who had an X account with over 90,000 followers, was jailed for three years for fueling the arrest after he alleged that a Muslim had carried out the Southport attack. “You were not caught up in what others were doing, you were instigating it,” the judge said during the sentencing. “The flames fanned by keyboard warriors like you.”

Advertisement

UK GOVERNMENT ACCUSED OF CRACKING DOWN ON FREE SPEECH: ‘THINK BEFORE YOU POST’

Police van on fire at riots in Southport, England, left, Smoke separates members of the police and the rioting public in Southport, England, right

Citizens of the normally ‘quiet’ town of Southport have gone into an uproar against police after at least three girls were killed in a mass stabbing yesterday. (Richard McCarthy/PA via AP)

But while the police remained tight-lipped on the grounds of not prejudicing the trial, issuing only a few details about the incident, British left-wing Prime Minister Keir Starmer was quick to slam the people participating in the unrest as “far right.”

Winston Marshall, Host of The Winston Marshall Show, told Fox News Digital, “Prime minister Starmer has been painstakingly careful not to prejudice the court proceedings of Axel Rudakubana after the new charges of possession of Islamist literature and Ricin were made.” 

The British podcaster host noted, “But we the British public remember clearly how Starmer branded the August rioters as “far-right thugs” almost immediately and before any of them were convicted. It is precisely this behavior for which he is rightly and bitterly mocked as “Two-Tier Keir.”

“Keir Starmer unhesitatingly referred to the rioters, some of whom had been arrested and were in custody, as far-right, so he had no hesitation in speculating about the motives of people who’d been arrested for rioting, even though that could easily prejudice their trials, too, and not all of them had pleaded guilty,” Young said.

Advertisement

“To describe someone who’s been arrested and charged, but pleaded not guilty, as a criminal is to potentially prejudice the outcome of their trial, too. It’s to not extend the presumption of innocence to them . . . signaling to potential jurors that the Home Office and, by implication, the Home Secretary believe them to be guilty,” he added.

Right-wing Reform Party Leader Nigel Farage was subject to a barrage of condemnation from a bipartisan group of senior Conservative and left-wing figures and accusations of inciting riots after questioning the lack of information being released to the public.

“I just wonder whether the truth is being withheld from us. I don’t know the answer to that, but I think it is a fair and legitimate question,” Farage said following the attack, asking further whether the suspect had been known and monitored by the country’s security services. Farage also questioned why the incident had not been treated as terror-related. 

UK RIOTS PLUNGE COUNTRY INTO WORST UNREST IN YEARS, PRIME MINISTER VOWS TO APPLY ‘FULL FORCE OF LAW’

Keir Starmer

Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer listens to the speech of Britain’s Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves at the Labour Party Conference in Liverpool, England, Monday, Sept. 23, 2024. (AP Photo/Jon Super)

Neil Basu, a former counter-terrorism police chief between 2018 and 2021, suggested that Farage could be subject to an investigation over these comments and accused the politician of “undermining the police, creating conspiracy theories, and giving a false basis for the attacks on the police.”

Advertisement

Conservative party peer Lord Barwell, a former MP who serves as former Prime Minister Theresa May’s chief of staff, called Farage “utterly shameful” for spreading “misinformation” on social media after the attack.

“He is an MP. If he has questions, he could have asked them in the House of Commons yesterday – but he wasn’t there. Instead, he prefers to encourage those spreading misinformation on here [social media]. Utterly shameful.”

But the latest police statement and the new terror-related charges somewhat exonerated the critics. “Perhaps I was right all along,” Farage said last week in a video posted on X.

Tidy up your tech: Spring-cleaning tips for safeguarding your data

A man typing on a laptop (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)

Farage wrote in the Daily Telegraph that he and his party colleagues were barred from raising questions about the Southport attack in Parliament because of fears that it may prejudice the public amid the suspect’s trial.

Farage said the authorities had told him he was not allowed to raise the matter in Parliament after he had submitted a written question to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper asking whether the accused attacker had ever been referred to the country’s counter-terrorism initiative.

Advertisement

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“It is impossible to infer anything other than that the apparatus of state are being used to manage this situation,” Farage said. “For now, therefore, it seems that nobody is allowed to ask in the proper forum when the government first knew that the accused was to face the ricin and terror material charges.

He added: “Likewise, nobody can know whether this man was known to the authorities in any way. Do we really want to live in a society where such crucial information is kept from the public? Who decided these details should remain secret?

Police and prosecutors still have not issued information to the public about whether the accused attacker was ever known to the country’s security and counter-terrorism authorities.

The alleged attacker was born in Wales to Rwandan parents, police said later. British media reported that he was raised Christian. The trial for murder charges is provisionally scheduled for January.

Advertisement

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

‘Yellowstone’ Season 5 Episode 13: Craziest Moments and Burning Questions, From Beth’s Strip Poker Gamble to Kayce’s Risky Tax Scheme

Published

on

‘Yellowstone’ Season 5 Episode 13: Craziest Moments and Burning Questions, From Beth’s Strip Poker Gamble to Kayce’s Risky Tax Scheme

SPOILER ALERT: This post contains spoilers from the Season 5, Episode 13 episode of “Yellowstone,” “Give the World Away” which premiered Sunday, Dec. 8 on Paramount Network.

It sure looks like “Yellowstone” is gearing up for one last rodeo, but the show keeps on giving to its audience: Jamie (Wes Bentley) is sniveling to another woman! Show creator Taylor Sheridan is ripped, shirtless and yammering about corndogs! Beth (Kelly Reilly) is angrily playing strip poker! Read on for our pithy rundown of the night’s events:

  • I’ve never understood if the Duttons are rich as hell or debtors with wild loans. The economics of ranch life don’t make any sense to me!
  • Jamie sitting around depressed in his underwear and yelling at the TV … shouldn’t you be running around scheming or shredding more documents?
  • Of course Beth has her brother saved in her phone as something profane.
  • Going back to the finance issue, Beth is flying private. How do they have the money to afford that?
  • I want Walker (Ryan Bingham) to comfort me after any future losses I have. His chat with Teeter (Jennifer Landon) is so soothing!
  • OK so with the fire sale of everything at the Yellowstone and Rip (Cole Hauser) telling Ryan (Ian Bohen) that everyone should find new work, I guess this really is the penultimate episode. Sadly, this show is ending with bit of a whimper.
  • Sheridan shows us a little more of his character Travis’ private life and he’s … a drinkin’, gamblin’, moderately irresponsible horndog? He seemed to be all business every other time we’ve seen him…
  • Oh, Travis’ girlfriend is played by Bella Hadid. How did she get mixed up in this show?
  • Beth has a lot of nerve asking Travis to help them without commission. I get that they’re on hard times, but you need to pay people for their work…
  • C’mon, Beth — at least stay for corndogs!
  • Welcome back, Christina (Katherine Cunningham). Long time no see.
  • Wow, Christina’s plan for Jamie to go on the offensive is actually pretty smart.
  • I’d definitely watch a prequel series following Young Rip and Young Travis.
  • These announcers are stars. Have them cover other events immediately, like the Olympics or Jake Paul’s fights.
  • Turnpike Troubadours? Great band! This sale is netting some real talent…
  • So the season finale (and final episode?) will be John Dutton’s funeral, right?
  • Beth’s solution to grief doesn’t sound too effective, but it’s very Beth!
  • Episode highlight: Beth’s brutal takedown of Aaron at the bar.
  • Poor Teeter. She did her best!
  • It’s hard to believe that Kayce (Luke Grimes) came up with this loophole idea. Isn’t it tax fraud of some kind?

Until next week, “Yellowstone” fans!

Continue Reading

World

South Korea imposes a travel ban on President Yoon over martial law declaration

Published

on

South Korea imposes a travel ban on President Yoon over martial law declaration

The South Korean Justice Ministry imposed an overseas travel ban against President Yoon Suk Yeol on Monday amid an investigation into allegations of rebellion and other charges over his short-lived martial law declaration.

Yoon had declared martial law last Tuesday, leading to special forces troops being deployed into the streets of Seoul and resulting in political protests.

On Saturday, Yoon escaped an opposition-led effort to impeach him, but the opposition parties pledged to issue a new impeachment motion against him this week.

Bae Sang-up, a Justice Ministry official, said at a parliamentary hearing that it banned Yoon from leaving the country after requests by police, prosecutors and an anti-corruption agency as they expand their investigations into the circumstances surrounding Yoon’s declaration.

SOUTH KOREA’S PRESIDENT YOON SURVIVES IMPEACHMENT ATTEMPT AFTER HIS PARTY BOYCOTTS VOTE

Advertisement

South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol speaks at the presidential office in Seoul, South Korea, Saturday, Dec. 7, 2024. (AP)

A senior National Police Agency officer told local reporters on Monday that police could also detain Yoon if conditions are met.

A sitting South Korean president has immunity from prosecution while in office, but that does not include protecting him from allegations of rebellion or treason.

Former President Park Geun-hye was thrown out of office in 2017 after being impeached by parliament over a corruption scandal. Prosecutors failed to search her office and ended up receiving documents outside the compound because presidential officials refused them entry.

After refusing to meet with prosecutors during her time in office, Park was questioned and arrested after the Constitutional Court approved her impeachment and ruled to dismiss her as president in March 2017.

Advertisement

SOUTH KOREAN PRESIDENT APOLOGIZES FOR DECLARING MARTIAL LAW AHEAD OF IMPEACHMENT VOTE

candlelight vigil

People hold candles during a candlelight vigil against South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol in Seoul, South Korea, Wednesday, Dec. 4, 2024. (AP)

The main opposition Democratic Party called Yoon’s martial law declaration “unconstitutional, illegal rebellion or a coup.” The party has filed complaints with police against at least nine people, including Yoon and his former defense minister, over the rebellion allegations.

South Korean prosecutors detained former Defense Minister Kim Yong Hyun on Sunday for allegedly recommending that Yoon declare martial law, making him the first person detained in the martial law case.

The Defense Ministry last week separately suspended three top military commanders over their alleged involvement in imposing martial law.

Yoon, a conservative, apologized on Saturday for the martial law declaration, saying he will not seek to avoid legal or political responsibility for the motion. He said he would allow his party to lead the country through its political turmoil, including matters related to his term in office.

Advertisement
South Korea's Yoon

South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol speaks during an interview at the presidential office in Seoul, South Korea, Tuesday, Jan. 10, 2023. (AP Photo/Lee Jin-man)

In his martial law announcement on Tuesday night, Yoon called parliament a “den of criminals” bogging down state affairs and vowed to eliminate “shameless North Korea followers and anti-state forces.”

Yoon’s martial law decree only lasted six hours because the National Assembly, including some members of Yoon’s governing People Power Party, voted to reverse it, forcing Yoon’s Cabinet to lift it.

Governing party leader Han Dong-hun said Sunday his party will push for Yoon’s early and orderly exit from office in a way that minimizes social confusion and that Yoon will not be involved in state affairs, including foreign policy.

During a Monday briefing, the Defense Ministry said Yoon maintains control of the military, which the constitution explicitly reserves for the president.

Advertisement

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

World

Did toxic algae kill hundreds of elephants in Botswana?

Published

on

Did toxic algae kill hundreds of elephants in Botswana?

An investigation into the sudden deaths of at least 350 elephants in Botswana in 2020 has revealed the cause was almost certainly a “toxic brew” of open water tainted by a species of cyanobacteria that released cyanotoxins, essentially contaminating the elephants’ watering holes.

According to researchers, approximately 20 watering holes in Botswana’s Okavango Delta had been contaminated across roughly 6,000sq km (2,316 square miles).

So what happened, and how?

What is cyanobacteria and how does it harm elephants?

Although not all cyanobacteria, commonly referred to as blue-green algae, is toxic, some cyanobacteria can produce a type of deadly algal blooms (HABs) in standing water. This is the type which was discovered in the investigation carried out by researchers at King’s College London.

The study showed that the African elephants (Loxodonta africana) died in May and June 2020 after drinking from water holes contaminated with these toxic algal blooms.

Advertisement

“Scientists believe that the production of cyanotoxins is related to certain environmental triggers, for example, sudden rise in water temperature, nutrient loading, salinity,” Davide Lomeo, Earth observation scientist at King’s College London, a collaborator with Plymouth Marine Laboratory and the Natural History Museum in London, and lead researcher in the recent study, told Al Jazeera.

How did the elephant deaths come to light?

In early to mid-2020, a series of routine aerial surveys conducted by helicopter by the conservation organisation, Elephants Without Borders, revealed multiple elephant carcasses scattered across the landscape of the Ngamiland district of northern Botswana.

The aerial survey showed 161 elephant carcasses and 222 sets of bones, while also counting 2,682 live elephants throughout the eastern region of the Okavango Panhandle. In addition, the distance between the dead elephants indicated the deaths had been sudden, rather than gradual.

“The strong clustering of carcasses also suggests that the event was sudden, with limited dispersal of elephants prior to death,” the authors of the study said.

A combination photo shows dead elephants in Okavango Delta, 2020 [Handout via Reuters]

How did researchers identify toxic algae as the cause of death?

Before researchers confirmed it was toxic algae which killed the elephants, they had to rule out several other probable causes.

Advertisement

“Although this area is a known poaching hotspot in Botswana, this was ruled out since elephant carcasses were found with tusks intact,” the authors of the study said.

Other initial theories included virulent and bacterial causes, such as encephalomyocarditis virus or anthrax, but the evidence taken from the field – such as the age of the dead elephants and the absence of any clinical signs of disease, meant the researchers ruled these out as the cause.

The distribution of carcasses and bones suggested a unique “spatial pattern”, which indicated that localised factors may have played a role in the mass die-off. This led to further exploration of specific environmental and ecological conditions in the affected areas.

There were several other factors that served as evidence that the elephant watering holes were to blame. Using satellite photos, researchers measured the distance the elephants walked after they drank from the watering holes – an average of 16.5km (10.2 miles). Many of the elephants died shortly thereafter, roughly 3.6 days (88 hours), after they drank from the nearby contaminated water holes.

The report states that 88 hours aligned with previously reported toxicological timelines for other large mammals which have died from blue algal poisoning.

Advertisement

In addition, Lomeo’s previous body of doctoral work investigating the history of mass-mortality events and water quality in waterbodies in Africa served as evidence to further look into the theory of water hole contamination.

“This event was what led to this idea, since it was a well-covered news at the time, but no one really knew why they died. I then applied my skills in geospatial and computational data science to investigate the event under a well-known set of methods typically applied in epidemiological investigations (eg COVID-19),” explained Lomeo.

algae
Blooming blue-green algae caused by cyanobacteria in water bodies, rivers and lakes can be poisonous for animals [Shutterstock]

What is still unknown about the elephant deaths?

It is impossible to measure the level of toxicity for each waterhole from aerial photos. In addition, it is unclear whether elephants drank from one watering hole or several, according to researchers.

“It is highly likely that they drank from multiple pans before their death. It cannot be established if the fatal intoxication occurred in a single drinking event, but it seems more plausible that if cyanotoxins were present and were the cause of the die-off, this was through toxins bioaccumulation in elephants’ organs,” stated the study.

Although it is clear that the toxic waterholes were the likely source of the elephants’ mass mortality, there remains some uncertainty about the findings due to the timing of the mass die-off.

“The event occurred during the COVID-19 movement restrictions, and timely intervention was not possible. Therefore, tissue samples [which would have confirmed the presence/ absence of cyanotoxins] were not collected. Post-mortem investigations also need to be done within a certain timeframe, beyond which samples would be too degraded. Additionally, cyanotoxins cannot be detected from satellites, so the links can only be but indirect,” Lomeo explained.

Advertisement

As the aerial data was collected considerable time after the deaths in March and May 2020 – researchers could not definitively rule out the involvement of other animals in the elephant deaths.

Furthermore, smaller creatures may have been missed in the aerial survey, potentially limiting scientists’ understanding of the full scope of the incident.

“The area is well-known for very high predation rates, meaning that animal carcasses disappear quickly because of scavengers like hyenas and vultures. Hence, the involvement of other animals cannot be ruled out,” Lomeo said.

The specific conditions that would produce the level of toxicity in a watering hole that would be lethal to surrounding animal species are also still unknown.

“There is still uncertainty. We know that certain cyanobacteria species are more likely to produce cyanotoxins, and we know which toxins each species typically produces,” said Lomeo.

Advertisement

According to the research, cyanotoxins exhibit significant variations in their potency and effects. Certain types are extremely toxic, capable of causing death even in very small concentrations. Others, while less immediately dangerous, may still pose health risks at higher levels without necessarily being lethal. The field of cyanotoxin research remains active, with many aspects yet to be fully understood and explored.

Despite this, the overall findings of the study have been widely accepted. “The cause of the die-off has been officially attributed by the Government of Botswana to environmental intoxication by cyanobacterial toxins, also known as cyanotoxins,” the study’s authors said.

Could this happen again?

Although mass deaths of elephants are rare, researchers cannot be certain it will not happen again and that it will only affect elephants or land animals.

“[In] all arid systems where animals are dependent on stagnant water in lakes/ponds are susceptible to this [mass die-offs], the aquatic life in lakes also can be harmed in this same manner. We have even seen this in rivers and oceans where high nitrification from agricultural run-off combined with warming temperatures leads to disastrous bacterial blooms,” George Wittemyer, a behavioural ecologist at Colorado State University, one of the institutes involved in a study in Kenya that revealed that elephants use individual names, told Al Jazeera.

While it was relatively easy for researchers to identify the elephant carcasses from the air due to their size, the sudden deaths of smaller animals might not be so easy to identify.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending