Connect with us

Indiana

Indiana softball tournament: Scores, schedule, updated pairings

Published

on


Under are schedules, scores and pairings for the 2022 Indiana highschool softball sectional tournaments. 

The sectional event is scheduled for Could 23-28, adopted by regionals on Could 31. Semi-States are June 4. The state finals are June 10-11 at Bittinger Stadium (Purdue College). 

CLASS 4A

Sectional 1. Lake Central (7)

G1: Hammond Morton vs. Hammond Central.

Advertisement

G2: Merrillville vs. Lake Central.

G3: Highland vs. Munster.

G4: East Chicago Central vs. G1 winner.

G5: G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Sectional 2. Chesterton (7)

Advertisement

G1: Michigan Metropolis vs. Lowell.

G2: Crown Level vs. Hobart.

G3: Portage vs. Chesterton.

G4: Valparaiso vs. G1 winner.

G5: G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Advertisement

Sectional 3. Mishawaka (5)

G1: Mishawaka vs. Penn.

G2: LaPorte vs. South Bend Riley.

G3: South Bend Adams vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 4. Warsaw Neighborhood (5)

Advertisement

G1: Goshen vs. Northridge.

G2: Harmony vs. Warsaw Neighborhood.

G3: Elkhart vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 5. Carroll (Fort Wayne) (5)

G1: Fort Wayne Snider vs. Fort Wayne Northrop.

Advertisement

G2: DeKalb vs. Carroll (Fort Wayne).

G3: East Noble vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 6. Columbia Metropolis (6)

G1: Fort Wayne South Aspect vs. Columbia Metropolis.

G2: Fort Wayne North Aspect vs. Homestead.

Advertisement

G3: Fort Wayne Wayne vs. G1 winner.

G4: Huntington North vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 7. McCutcheon (5)

G1: Logansport vs. McCutcheon.

G2: Kokomo vs. Harrison (West Lafayette).

Advertisement

G3: Lafayette Jefferson vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 8. Fishers (6)

G1: Hamilton Southeastern vs. Carmel.

G2: Noblesville vs. Westfield.

G3: Zionsville vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Fishers vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 9. Pendleton Heights (6)

G1: Richmond vs. Pendleton Heights.

G2: Greenfield-Central vs. Mt. Vernon (Fortville).

G3: Anderson vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Muncie Central vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 10. Ben Davis (6)

G1: Pike vs. Ben Davis.

G2: North Central (Indianapolis) vs. Lawrence Central.

G3: Indianapolis Arsenal Technical vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Lawrence North vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 11. Franklin Central (6)

G1: Southport vs. New Palestine.

G2: Warren Central vs. Roncalli.

G3: Perry Meridian vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Franklin Central vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 12. Plainfield (6)

G1: Terre Haute North Vigo vs. Plainfield.

G2: Avon vs. Terre Haute South Vigo.

G3: Brownsburg vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Decatur Central vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 13. Mooresville (6)

G1: Mooresville vs. Middle Grove.

G2: Franklin Neighborhood vs. Greenwood Neighborhood.

G3: Martinsville vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Whiteland Neighborhood vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 14. Bloomington North (6)

G1: Columbus North vs. East Central.

G2: Bloomington South vs. Shelbyville.

G3: Bloomington North vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Columbus East vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 15. Floyd Central (6)

G1: New Albany vs. Jeffersonville.

G2: Floyd Central vs. Seymour.

G3: Jennings County vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Bedford North Lawrence vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 16. Evansville North (6)

G1: Evansville Reitz vs. Evansville Central.

G2: Evansville North vs. Fort.

G3: Evansville Harrison vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Jasper vs. G2 winner.

CLASS 3A

Sectional 17. Griffith (5)

G1: Gary West Aspect vs. Calumet.

G2: Hanover Central vs. River Forest.

G3: Griffith vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

Sectional 18. Kankakee Valley (5)

G1: Knox vs. Plymouth.

G2: Glenn vs. Culver Academies.

G3: Kankakee Valley vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 19. Mishawaka Marian (5)

Advertisement

G1: South Bend St. Joseph vs. New Prairie.

G2: South Bend Washington vs. Mishawaka Marian.

G3: South Bend Clay vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 20. Twin Lakes (7)

G1: Western vs. Peru.

Advertisement

G2: West Lafayette vs. Benton Central.

G3: Maconaquah vs. Twin Lakes.

G4: Northwestern vs. G1 winner.

G5: G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Sectional 21. Wawasee (5)

Advertisement

G1: West Noble vs. NorthWood.

G2: Jimtown vs. Lakeland.

G3: Wawasee vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 22. Garrett (6)

G1: New Haven vs. Angola.

Advertisement

G2: Leo vs. Fort Wayne Concordia Lutheran.

G3: Garrett vs. G1 winner.

G4: Fort Wayne Bishop Dwenger vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 23. Bellmont (5)

G1: Heritage vs. Bellmont.

Advertisement

G2: Norwell vs. Marion.

G3: Mississinewa vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 24. Delta (6)

G1: Hamilton Heights vs. Yorktown.

G2: Jay County vs. New Fort.

Advertisement

G3: Delta vs. G1 winner.

G4: Guerin Catholic vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 25. Lebanon (5)

G1: Tri-West Hendricks vs. North Montgomery.

G2: Crawfordsville vs. Lebanon.

Advertisement

G3: Frankfort vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 26. Cardinal Ritter (5)

G1: Shortridge vs. Brebeuf Jesuit.

G2: Crispus Attucks vs. Danville Neighborhood.

G3: Cardinal Ritter vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

Sectional 27. Bishop Chatard (5)

G1: Bishop Chatard vs. Beech Grove.

G2: Cathedral vs. Herron.

G3: Christel Home vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 28. Owen Valley (6)

Advertisement

G1: West Vigo vs. Owen Valley.

G2: Northview vs. Indian Creek.

G3: Edgewood vs. G1 winner.

G4: Brown County vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 29. Franklin County (7)

Advertisement

G1: Lawrenceburg vs. Franklin County.

G2: South Dearborn vs. Batesville.

G3: Connersville vs. Greensburg.

G4: Rushville Consolidated vs. G1 winner.

G5: G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Advertisement

Sectional 30. Corydon Central (8)

G1: Silver Creek vs. Brownstown Central.

G2: North Harrison vs. Corydon Central.

G3: Scottsburg vs. Madison Consolidated.

G4: Charlestown vs. Salem.

Advertisement

Sectional 31. Gibson Southern (5)

G1: Vincennes Lincoln vs. Princeton Neighborhood.

G2: Washington vs. Pike Central.

G3: Gibson Southern vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 32. Heritage Hills (5)

Advertisement

G1: Evansville Bosse vs. Mt. Vernon.

G2: Boonville vs. Evansville Memorial.

G3: Heritage Hills vs. G1 winner.

CLASS 2A

Sectional 33. Wheeler (6)

G1: Andrean vs. Whiting.

Advertisement

G2: Hammond Bishop Noll vs. Lake Station Edison.

G3: Illiana Christian vs. G1 winner.

G4: Wheeler vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 34. North Judson-San Pierre (7)

G1: Boone Grove vs. Winamac Neighborhood.

Advertisement

G2: North Newton vs. North Judson-San Pierre. G3: Rensselaer Central vs. Pioneer.

G4: Hebron vs. G1 winner.

G5: G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Sectional 35. Westview (6)

G1: LaVille vs. Westview.

Advertisement

G2: Central Noble vs. Prairie Heights.

G3: Fairfield vs. G1 winner.

G4: Bremen vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 36. Eastside (7)

G1: Eastside vs. South Adams.

Advertisement

G2: Fort Wayne Bishop Luers vs. Bluffton. G3: Woodlan vs. Churubusco.

G4: Adams Central vs. G1 winner.

G5: G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Sectional 37. Wabash (6)

G1: Rochester Neighborhood vs. Tippecanoe Valley.

Advertisement

G2: Manchester vs. Lewis Cass.

G3: Whitko vs. G1 winner.

G4: Wabash vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 38. Southmont (5)

G1: Seeger vs. Delphi Neighborhood.

Advertisement

G2: Clinton Prairie vs. Southmont.

G3: Western Boone vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 39. Oak Hill (7)

G1: Madison-Grant vs. Taylor.

G2: Tipton vs. Jap (Greentown).

Advertisement

G3: Oak Hill vs. Eastbrook.

G4: Blackford vs. G1 winner.

G5: G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Sectional 40. Lapel (7)

G1:  Alexandria Monroe vs. Lapel.

Advertisement

G2:  Winchester Neighborhood vs. Frankton.

G3:  Wapahani vs. Monroe Central.

G4:  Elwood Neighborhood vs. G1 winner.

G5:  G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Sectional 41. Union County (5)

Advertisement

G1: Union County vs. Shenandoah.

G2: Northeastern vs. Centerville.

G3: Hagerstown vs. G1 winner. 

Sectional 42. Jap Hancock (5)

G1: Jap Hancock vs. Knightstown.

Advertisement

G2: Triton Central vs. Indianapolis Scecina.

G3: Heritage Christian vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 43. Cascade (5)

G1: Monrovia vs. Covenant Christian (Indianapolis).

G2: Cascade vs. Park Tudor.

Advertisement

G3: Speedway vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 44. South Vermillion (6)

G1: Greencastle vs. Cloverdale.

G2: Parke Heritage vs. North Putnam.

G3: South Putnam vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: South Vermillion vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 45. Switzerland County (6)

G1: Southwestern (Hanover) vs. North Decatur.

G2: Austin vs. South Ripley.

G3: Switzerland County vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Milan vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 46. Mitchell (6)

G1: Crawford County vs. Windfall.

G2: Clarksville vs. Jap (Pekin).

G3: Mitchell vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Paoli vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 47. South Knox (6)

G1: North Knox vs. Southridge.

G2: Jap Greene vs. South Knox.

G3: Linton-Stockton vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Sullivan vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 48. Forest Park (6)

G1: Inform Metropolis vs. Evansville Mater Dei.

G2: Perry Central vs. South Spencer.

G3: North Posey vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Forest Park vs. G2 winner.

CLASS A

Sectional 49. Kouts (7)

G1: Kouts vs. Marquette Catholic.

G2: Morgan Township vs. Westville.

G3: Washington Township vs. Hammond S&T.

Advertisement

G4: Covenant Christian (DeMotte) vs. G1 winner.

G5: G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Sectional 50. LaCrosse (7)

G1: LaCrosse vs. South Central (Union Mills).

G2: Oregon-Davis vs. Argos.

Advertisement

G3: South Bend Profession vs. Culver Neighborhood.

G4: Triton vs. G1 winner.

G5: G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Sectional 51. Fremont (5)

G1: Elkhart Christian vs. Hamilton.

Advertisement

G2: Fort Wayne Canterbury vs. Fremont.

G3: Lakewood Park Christian vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 52. North Miami (6)

G1: West Central vs. Northfield.

G2: Southwood vs. Caston.

Advertisement

G3: North Miami vs. G1 winner.

G4: North White vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 53. Riverton Parke (7)

G1: North Vermillion vs. Lafayette Central Catholic.

G2: Attica vs. Riverton Parke.

Advertisement

G3: Covington vs. Fountain Central.

G4: Religion Christian vs. G1 winner.

G5: G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Sectional 54. Rossville (7)

G1: Frontier vs. Carroll (Flora).

Advertisement

G2: Rossville vs. Sheridan.

G3: Clinton Central vs. South Newton.

G4: Tri-County vs. G1 winner.

G5: G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Sectional 55. Daleville (6)

Advertisement

G1: Liberty Christian vs. Cowan.

G2: Southern Wells vs. Daleville.

G3: Wes-Del vs. G1 winner.

G4: Tri-Central vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 56. Tri (5)

Advertisement

G1: Blue River Valley vs. Randolph Southern.

G2: Tri vs. Union Metropolis.

G3: Cambridge Metropolis Lincoln vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 57. White River Valley (6)

G1: Eminence vs. White River Valley.

Advertisement

G2: North Central (Farmersburg) vs. Bloomfield.

G3: Clay Metropolis vs. G1 winner.

G4: Shakamak vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 58. Bethesda Christian (7)

G1: Windfall Cristo Rey vs. Riverside.

Advertisement

G2: College vs. Bethesda Christian.

G3: Irvington Preparatory vs. Merchants Level Christian.

G4: Indiana Deaf vs. G1 winner.

G5: G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Sectional 59. Indianapolis Lutheran (5)

Advertisement

G1: Indianapolis Lutheran vs. Edinburgh.

G2: Greenwood Christian vs. Morristown.

G3: Waldron vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 60. Rising Solar (5)

G1: Hauser vs. Oldenburg.

Advertisement

G2: Jac-Cen-Del vs. Rising Solar.

G3: South Decatur vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 61. Borden (6)

G1: Lanesville vs. Orleans.

G2: Christian Academy of Indiana vs. West Washington.

Advertisement

G3: Borden vs. G1 winner.

G4: South Central (Elizabeth) vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 62. Henryville (4)

G1: Rock Creek vs. New Washington.

G2: Trinity Lutheran vs. Henryville.

Advertisement

Sectional 63. North Daviess (4)

G1: North Daviess vs. Loogootee.

G2: Shoals vs. Barr-Reeve.

Sectional 64. Northeast Dubois (5)

G1: Cannelton vs. Springs Valley.

Advertisement

G2: Tecumseh vs. Wooden Memorial.

G3: Northeast Dubois vs. G1 winner.

Comply with Brian Haenchen on Twitter at @Brian_Haenchen.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Indiana

Pacers sign two guards to two-way contracts

Published

on

Pacers sign two guards to two-way contracts


INDIANAPOLIS (WISH) — The Indiana Pacers finalized two more deals for their roster Saturday.

This year’s second-round draft pick Tristen Newton and fellow guard Quenton Jackson both signed two-way contracts with the Blue and Gold — which will allow them to play for both the Pacers and Indiana’s G League team, the Indiana Mad Ants.

Newton comes to Indiana after winning back-to-back national titles with UConn. During the Huskies’ March domination last season, Newton averaged 15.1 points, 6.6 rebounds, and 6.2 assists a game.

Jackson played three games for the Pacers late in the season last year. The most game action he’s seen with Indiana so far is the seven minutes he played against the Atlanta Hawks on April 14. Jackson spent the previous season in Washington, appearing in nine games for the Wizards.

Advertisement

The Pacers have been ironing out the details of many deals this postseason. President Kevin Pritchard and his front office signed forward Pascal Siakam to the second-largest contract in franchise history — a four-year, $189.5 million deal. Wednesday, guard Andrew Nembhard agreed to a three-year extension worth $59 million. Nembhard is in Paris playing for Team Canada in the 2024 Summer Olympic Games.



Source link

Continue Reading

Indiana

Quenton Jackson re-signs with Indiana Pacers on a two-way contract

Published

on

Quenton Jackson re-signs with Indiana Pacers on a two-way contract


According to the NBA’s official transaction log, the Indiana Pacers re-signed guard Quenton Jackson to a two-way contract.

Jackson finished the 2023-24 season on a two-way deal with Indiana, and he played in three games for the Pacers after being signed in March. He averaged 0.7 points, 1.3 rebounds, and 0.7 assists per game.

More of his appearances with the franchise came in the G League with the Indiana Mad Ants. He was only with the club for a month, but he led the team in scoring at 22.3 points per game while adding 4.8 rebounds and 5.3 assists per outing. His ability to get to the rim and finish is impressive — he shot 55.6% from the field despite being just okay as a three-point shooter.

Because he popped somewhat, the blue and gold sent him a qualifying offer in June, which made him a restricted free agent. The Pacers had the chance to match offers from other teams, and Jackson could have signed that offer at any time.

Advertisement

On Friday, he re-signed with the Pacers on a two-way deal. Indiana had all three of its two-way slots open prior to the agreement, and they still have a pair available.

A two-way deal will make it easy for Jackson to split time between the Pacers and Mad Ants, should he remain on the contract. He just finished playing in summer league for Indiana, where he averaged 11 points and 4.2 assists per game.

The Pacers now have 16 players under contract including standard deals and two-way agreements.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

Tristen Newton struggles during summer league for Indiana Pacers, but should be able to be better in the future

Published

on

Tristen Newton struggles during summer league for Indiana Pacers, but should be able to be better in the future


LAS VEGAS — Tristen Newton had simple hopes for his first summer league: he wanted to leave an impression.

The rookie guard, who was drafted 49th overall by the Indiana Pacers in the 2024 NBA Draft, showed a little bit of everything during his college days. At UConn, where he won two national titles, he was a capable rebounder, strong passer, and effective scorer. At his best, he knocked down threes.

There was prevalent thinking that a player like him could be effective during summer league. And yet, despite his wide-ranging talent in college, it was actually totally different skills that popped for Newton during the tune-up games: his ability to draw fouls.

Newton took 28 free throws in Las Vegas, which topped the Pacers by far. Nobody else on the roster even reached 20. He was one of just two players to average more than 5.5 free throw attempts per game in under 22 minutes per night (Moses Brown of the LA Lakers was the other).

Advertisement

Indiana’s rookie point guard finished summer league with a free throw rate of 70%, far better than his collegiate figure of 46.9%. He made 89.3% of those foul shots, which kept his efficiency afloat.

Newton’s game stood out in that way. His second-best skill was his passing in traffic — he averaged 4.6 assists per game, good for second on the team, and quite a few of them came in tight spaces. As a point guard, that skill will be important.

“Tristen Newton, tremendous [growth] from game one to game five,” Pacers summer league head coach Jannero Pargo said. “Understanding our offense more, playing more confident. Being able to call plays and run our sets and be more comfortable out there.”

Unfortunately for Newton, some of his other skills from his NCAA days didn’t translate to the Vegas heat. In particular, his shot making was a disaster, and that held down his effectiveness.

The rookie guard shot 8/40 from the field across his five games, good for just 20%. He was 4/22 from long range (18.2%) and a not-much-better 4/18 (22.2%) on two-point looks. Shot distance and location didn’t matter — Newton struggled.

Advertisement

Taking 22 threes in five games in solid, and volume transfers more often from summer league than percentage. That’s the bright side for the young guard. But those field goals did not drop, and his ability to create good looks inside the arc didn’t pop.

Newton did grab 3.8 rebounds per game, a fine number for a guard, but he also had 2.8 turnovers per night. At times, he looked rushed and gave up the ball too quickly. He didn’t get all the way to the rim on his drives.

In those ways, Newton needed to be better. His defense was fine enough and he got his hands on a few steals, but the disappointing play finishing really hindered his effectiveness during summer league.

The Pacers liked that Newton was a more established player when they selected him in the draft. His play during summer league shouldn’t deter that thinking — if anything, the context around his summer outings should provide important perspective.

Newton played for a UConn team in 2022-23 that got up threes and had multiple players capable of setting the table for others. He performed well, and the team was great. In the following season, the Huskies dramatically changed their play style. There were fewer outside shots, and Newton’s playmaking burden grew.

Advertisement

He was extremely effective in both systems, which is why he was an All-Big East player and consensus All-American. He can adapt to any team when he gets time within a style and with a coaching staff.

In summer league, there is no time. Newton still hadn’t been drafted one month ago today. He went through a minicamp that was less than a week long, then was thrown into action. It didn’t always look great, though there were successes.

His free throw rate was extremely encouraging, but the shots didn’t fall. His rebounding was effective, yet the turnovers were concerning. Overall, the lack of shot making made the experience a negative.

But it is still reasonable to believe that Newton can be a capable do-it-all floor general when given time and space to figure out how his shots will come and what his teammates do well. He did it twice at UConn, and he can do it again in the NBA. He very quickly left an impression on his new teammates.

“Trsiten and Johnny [Furphy] are great guys,” Pacers rookie forward Enrique Freeman said. Newton didn’t get off to an awesome start, but he should have little trouble being more effective in future settings.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending