Connect with us

Indiana

Indiana softball tournament: Scores, schedule, updated pairings

Published

on


Under are schedules, scores and pairings for the 2022 Indiana highschool softball sectional tournaments. 

The sectional event is scheduled for Could 23-28, adopted by regionals on Could 31. Semi-States are June 4. The state finals are June 10-11 at Bittinger Stadium (Purdue College). 

CLASS 4A

Sectional 1. Lake Central (7)

G1: Hammond Morton vs. Hammond Central.

Advertisement

G2: Merrillville vs. Lake Central.

G3: Highland vs. Munster.

G4: East Chicago Central vs. G1 winner.

G5: G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Sectional 2. Chesterton (7)

Advertisement

G1: Michigan Metropolis vs. Lowell.

G2: Crown Level vs. Hobart.

G3: Portage vs. Chesterton.

G4: Valparaiso vs. G1 winner.

G5: G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Advertisement

Sectional 3. Mishawaka (5)

G1: Mishawaka vs. Penn.

G2: LaPorte vs. South Bend Riley.

G3: South Bend Adams vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 4. Warsaw Neighborhood (5)

Advertisement

G1: Goshen vs. Northridge.

G2: Harmony vs. Warsaw Neighborhood.

G3: Elkhart vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 5. Carroll (Fort Wayne) (5)

G1: Fort Wayne Snider vs. Fort Wayne Northrop.

Advertisement

G2: DeKalb vs. Carroll (Fort Wayne).

G3: East Noble vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 6. Columbia Metropolis (6)

G1: Fort Wayne South Aspect vs. Columbia Metropolis.

G2: Fort Wayne North Aspect vs. Homestead.

Advertisement

G3: Fort Wayne Wayne vs. G1 winner.

G4: Huntington North vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 7. McCutcheon (5)

G1: Logansport vs. McCutcheon.

G2: Kokomo vs. Harrison (West Lafayette).

Advertisement

G3: Lafayette Jefferson vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 8. Fishers (6)

G1: Hamilton Southeastern vs. Carmel.

G2: Noblesville vs. Westfield.

G3: Zionsville vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Fishers vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 9. Pendleton Heights (6)

G1: Richmond vs. Pendleton Heights.

G2: Greenfield-Central vs. Mt. Vernon (Fortville).

G3: Anderson vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Muncie Central vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 10. Ben Davis (6)

G1: Pike vs. Ben Davis.

G2: North Central (Indianapolis) vs. Lawrence Central.

G3: Indianapolis Arsenal Technical vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Lawrence North vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 11. Franklin Central (6)

G1: Southport vs. New Palestine.

G2: Warren Central vs. Roncalli.

G3: Perry Meridian vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Franklin Central vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 12. Plainfield (6)

G1: Terre Haute North Vigo vs. Plainfield.

G2: Avon vs. Terre Haute South Vigo.

G3: Brownsburg vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Decatur Central vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 13. Mooresville (6)

G1: Mooresville vs. Middle Grove.

G2: Franklin Neighborhood vs. Greenwood Neighborhood.

G3: Martinsville vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Whiteland Neighborhood vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 14. Bloomington North (6)

G1: Columbus North vs. East Central.

G2: Bloomington South vs. Shelbyville.

G3: Bloomington North vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Columbus East vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 15. Floyd Central (6)

G1: New Albany vs. Jeffersonville.

G2: Floyd Central vs. Seymour.

G3: Jennings County vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Bedford North Lawrence vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 16. Evansville North (6)

G1: Evansville Reitz vs. Evansville Central.

G2: Evansville North vs. Fort.

G3: Evansville Harrison vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Jasper vs. G2 winner.

CLASS 3A

Sectional 17. Griffith (5)

G1: Gary West Aspect vs. Calumet.

G2: Hanover Central vs. River Forest.

G3: Griffith vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

Sectional 18. Kankakee Valley (5)

G1: Knox vs. Plymouth.

G2: Glenn vs. Culver Academies.

G3: Kankakee Valley vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 19. Mishawaka Marian (5)

Advertisement

G1: South Bend St. Joseph vs. New Prairie.

G2: South Bend Washington vs. Mishawaka Marian.

G3: South Bend Clay vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 20. Twin Lakes (7)

G1: Western vs. Peru.

Advertisement

G2: West Lafayette vs. Benton Central.

G3: Maconaquah vs. Twin Lakes.

G4: Northwestern vs. G1 winner.

G5: G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Sectional 21. Wawasee (5)

Advertisement

G1: West Noble vs. NorthWood.

G2: Jimtown vs. Lakeland.

G3: Wawasee vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 22. Garrett (6)

G1: New Haven vs. Angola.

Advertisement

G2: Leo vs. Fort Wayne Concordia Lutheran.

G3: Garrett vs. G1 winner.

G4: Fort Wayne Bishop Dwenger vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 23. Bellmont (5)

G1: Heritage vs. Bellmont.

Advertisement

G2: Norwell vs. Marion.

G3: Mississinewa vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 24. Delta (6)

G1: Hamilton Heights vs. Yorktown.

G2: Jay County vs. New Fort.

Advertisement

G3: Delta vs. G1 winner.

G4: Guerin Catholic vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 25. Lebanon (5)

G1: Tri-West Hendricks vs. North Montgomery.

G2: Crawfordsville vs. Lebanon.

Advertisement

G3: Frankfort vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 26. Cardinal Ritter (5)

G1: Shortridge vs. Brebeuf Jesuit.

G2: Crispus Attucks vs. Danville Neighborhood.

G3: Cardinal Ritter vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

Sectional 27. Bishop Chatard (5)

G1: Bishop Chatard vs. Beech Grove.

G2: Cathedral vs. Herron.

G3: Christel Home vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 28. Owen Valley (6)

Advertisement

G1: West Vigo vs. Owen Valley.

G2: Northview vs. Indian Creek.

G3: Edgewood vs. G1 winner.

G4: Brown County vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 29. Franklin County (7)

Advertisement

G1: Lawrenceburg vs. Franklin County.

G2: South Dearborn vs. Batesville.

G3: Connersville vs. Greensburg.

G4: Rushville Consolidated vs. G1 winner.

G5: G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Advertisement

Sectional 30. Corydon Central (8)

G1: Silver Creek vs. Brownstown Central.

G2: North Harrison vs. Corydon Central.

G3: Scottsburg vs. Madison Consolidated.

G4: Charlestown vs. Salem.

Advertisement

Sectional 31. Gibson Southern (5)

G1: Vincennes Lincoln vs. Princeton Neighborhood.

G2: Washington vs. Pike Central.

G3: Gibson Southern vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 32. Heritage Hills (5)

Advertisement

G1: Evansville Bosse vs. Mt. Vernon.

G2: Boonville vs. Evansville Memorial.

G3: Heritage Hills vs. G1 winner.

CLASS 2A

Sectional 33. Wheeler (6)

G1: Andrean vs. Whiting.

Advertisement

G2: Hammond Bishop Noll vs. Lake Station Edison.

G3: Illiana Christian vs. G1 winner.

G4: Wheeler vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 34. North Judson-San Pierre (7)

G1: Boone Grove vs. Winamac Neighborhood.

Advertisement

G2: North Newton vs. North Judson-San Pierre. G3: Rensselaer Central vs. Pioneer.

G4: Hebron vs. G1 winner.

G5: G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Sectional 35. Westview (6)

G1: LaVille vs. Westview.

Advertisement

G2: Central Noble vs. Prairie Heights.

G3: Fairfield vs. G1 winner.

G4: Bremen vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 36. Eastside (7)

G1: Eastside vs. South Adams.

Advertisement

G2: Fort Wayne Bishop Luers vs. Bluffton. G3: Woodlan vs. Churubusco.

G4: Adams Central vs. G1 winner.

G5: G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Sectional 37. Wabash (6)

G1: Rochester Neighborhood vs. Tippecanoe Valley.

Advertisement

G2: Manchester vs. Lewis Cass.

G3: Whitko vs. G1 winner.

G4: Wabash vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 38. Southmont (5)

G1: Seeger vs. Delphi Neighborhood.

Advertisement

G2: Clinton Prairie vs. Southmont.

G3: Western Boone vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 39. Oak Hill (7)

G1: Madison-Grant vs. Taylor.

G2: Tipton vs. Jap (Greentown).

Advertisement

G3: Oak Hill vs. Eastbrook.

G4: Blackford vs. G1 winner.

G5: G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Sectional 40. Lapel (7)

G1:  Alexandria Monroe vs. Lapel.

Advertisement

G2:  Winchester Neighborhood vs. Frankton.

G3:  Wapahani vs. Monroe Central.

G4:  Elwood Neighborhood vs. G1 winner.

G5:  G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Sectional 41. Union County (5)

Advertisement

G1: Union County vs. Shenandoah.

G2: Northeastern vs. Centerville.

G3: Hagerstown vs. G1 winner. 

Sectional 42. Jap Hancock (5)

G1: Jap Hancock vs. Knightstown.

Advertisement

G2: Triton Central vs. Indianapolis Scecina.

G3: Heritage Christian vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 43. Cascade (5)

G1: Monrovia vs. Covenant Christian (Indianapolis).

G2: Cascade vs. Park Tudor.

Advertisement

G3: Speedway vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 44. South Vermillion (6)

G1: Greencastle vs. Cloverdale.

G2: Parke Heritage vs. North Putnam.

G3: South Putnam vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: South Vermillion vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 45. Switzerland County (6)

G1: Southwestern (Hanover) vs. North Decatur.

G2: Austin vs. South Ripley.

G3: Switzerland County vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Milan vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 46. Mitchell (6)

G1: Crawford County vs. Windfall.

G2: Clarksville vs. Jap (Pekin).

G3: Mitchell vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Paoli vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 47. South Knox (6)

G1: North Knox vs. Southridge.

G2: Jap Greene vs. South Knox.

G3: Linton-Stockton vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Sullivan vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 48. Forest Park (6)

G1: Inform Metropolis vs. Evansville Mater Dei.

G2: Perry Central vs. South Spencer.

G3: North Posey vs. G1 winner.

Advertisement

G4: Forest Park vs. G2 winner.

CLASS A

Sectional 49. Kouts (7)

G1: Kouts vs. Marquette Catholic.

G2: Morgan Township vs. Westville.

G3: Washington Township vs. Hammond S&T.

Advertisement

G4: Covenant Christian (DeMotte) vs. G1 winner.

G5: G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Sectional 50. LaCrosse (7)

G1: LaCrosse vs. South Central (Union Mills).

G2: Oregon-Davis vs. Argos.

Advertisement

G3: South Bend Profession vs. Culver Neighborhood.

G4: Triton vs. G1 winner.

G5: G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Sectional 51. Fremont (5)

G1: Elkhart Christian vs. Hamilton.

Advertisement

G2: Fort Wayne Canterbury vs. Fremont.

G3: Lakewood Park Christian vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 52. North Miami (6)

G1: West Central vs. Northfield.

G2: Southwood vs. Caston.

Advertisement

G3: North Miami vs. G1 winner.

G4: North White vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 53. Riverton Parke (7)

G1: North Vermillion vs. Lafayette Central Catholic.

G2: Attica vs. Riverton Parke.

Advertisement

G3: Covington vs. Fountain Central.

G4: Religion Christian vs. G1 winner.

G5: G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Sectional 54. Rossville (7)

G1: Frontier vs. Carroll (Flora).

Advertisement

G2: Rossville vs. Sheridan.

G3: Clinton Central vs. South Newton.

G4: Tri-County vs. G1 winner.

G5: G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Sectional 55. Daleville (6)

Advertisement

G1: Liberty Christian vs. Cowan.

G2: Southern Wells vs. Daleville.

G3: Wes-Del vs. G1 winner.

G4: Tri-Central vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 56. Tri (5)

Advertisement

G1: Blue River Valley vs. Randolph Southern.

G2: Tri vs. Union Metropolis.

G3: Cambridge Metropolis Lincoln vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 57. White River Valley (6)

G1: Eminence vs. White River Valley.

Advertisement

G2: North Central (Farmersburg) vs. Bloomfield.

G3: Clay Metropolis vs. G1 winner.

G4: Shakamak vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 58. Bethesda Christian (7)

G1: Windfall Cristo Rey vs. Riverside.

Advertisement

G2: College vs. Bethesda Christian.

G3: Irvington Preparatory vs. Merchants Level Christian.

G4: Indiana Deaf vs. G1 winner.

G5: G2 winner vs. G3 winner.

Sectional 59. Indianapolis Lutheran (5)

Advertisement

G1: Indianapolis Lutheran vs. Edinburgh.

G2: Greenwood Christian vs. Morristown.

G3: Waldron vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 60. Rising Solar (5)

G1: Hauser vs. Oldenburg.

Advertisement

G2: Jac-Cen-Del vs. Rising Solar.

G3: South Decatur vs. G1 winner.

Sectional 61. Borden (6)

G1: Lanesville vs. Orleans.

G2: Christian Academy of Indiana vs. West Washington.

Advertisement

G3: Borden vs. G1 winner.

G4: South Central (Elizabeth) vs. G2 winner.

Sectional 62. Henryville (4)

G1: Rock Creek vs. New Washington.

G2: Trinity Lutheran vs. Henryville.

Advertisement

Sectional 63. North Daviess (4)

G1: North Daviess vs. Loogootee.

G2: Shoals vs. Barr-Reeve.

Sectional 64. Northeast Dubois (5)

G1: Cannelton vs. Springs Valley.

Advertisement

G2: Tecumseh vs. Wooden Memorial.

G3: Northeast Dubois vs. G1 winner.

Comply with Brian Haenchen on Twitter at @Brian_Haenchen.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Indiana

Jack’s Take: Battle 4 Atlantis a Chance to Learn About Indiana, Pick Up Much-Needed Wins

Published

on

Jack’s Take: Battle 4 Atlantis a Chance to Learn About Indiana, Pick Up Much-Needed Wins


PARADISE ISLAND, The Bahamas – The slate of marquee nonconference games surrounding Thanksgiving has become known as Feast Week.

Tournaments in Maui, the Bahamas, Las Vegas and elsewhere generate top-25 matchups on a daily basis. Monday, Memphis upset back-to-back national champion No. 2 UConn. No. 4 Auburn erased a 16-point halftime deficit to take down No. 5 Iowa State. And No. 12 North Carolina came back from 21 points down to defeat Dayton.

That was just the start of a week that makes November feel a bit like March. No. 14 Indiana will compete in the eight-team Battle 4 Atlantis tournament in the Bahamas, along with No. 3 Gonzaga, No. 24 Arizona, West Virginia, Oklahoma, Providence and Davidson.

Indiana is off to a 4-0 start and rose two spots in the latest AP Top 25 poll. Three wins have come against mid-major foes Southern Illlinois-Edwardsville, Eastern Illinois and UNC Greensboro. Indiana also handled South Carolina in a 16-point win, but the Gamecocks have taken a step back from last year’s second-place SEC finish.

Advertisement

And with a nonconference slate that features just one high-major opponent outside its three opportunities in the Bahamas, the Hoosiers must eat up all the opportunities Feast Week offers. 

That starts with a matchup against Louisville, a team Indiana defeated 74-66 last year in the Empire Classic. But the new-look Cardinals are a completely different unit now, led by former College of Charleston head coach Pat Kelsey, 13 new transfers and one freshman. Louisville failed its biggest test of the season so far, a 77-55 home loss to Tennessee, but it’s shaping up to be a far more competitive team than those that went 12-52 in two years under former head coach Kenny Payne.

Analytics site Bart Torvik favors the Hoosiers by 3.6 points and ranks them 30th nationally, compared to the No. 57 Cardinals. With a win, Indiana would likely advance to face Gonzaga, which moved up to No. 3 in the latest AP Top 25 poll and is ranked No. 4 by Torvik.

That’s when the big challenge could come, one that Indiana vitally needs to meet as it builds an NCAA Tournament resume. Its best win so far is South Carolina, currently a bubble team at best. The Hoosiers may end up with wins against mid-major teams that reach the NCAA Tournament, but none that they can hang their hats on come Selection Sunday. 

And once they return to Bloomington, they won’t get another chance to pick up a quality win until Big Ten play. That’s part of the risk that came with Indiana scheduling lighter than normal in the nonconference and relying so much on what it can gain in the Bahamas.

Advertisement

The other factor is that beyond Louisville, Indiana doesn’t know exactly who it’ll play this week. Upsets happen in college basketball all the time, and Indiana could end up facing a lighter slate this week by no fault of its own. Or it could lose to a capable Louisville team Wednesday and head to the loser’s bracket, where wins over certain opponents may not significantly strengthen its profile. 

This Indiana team has enough talent that reaching the NCAA Tournament shouldn’t be in question, but its schedule lacks frequent opportunities at resume-boosting wins. 

The other question going into the Battle 4 Atlantis is, how much do we really know about the Hoosiers so far? In terms of its Big Ten and national title aspirations, almost nothing. We can speculate how Indiana might fare against premier programs, but this tournament in the Bahamas represents the first time we’ll actually see it.

Indiana’s 4-0 start has mostly provided optimism, as the Hoosiers have defeated each team by 11 points or more. But there have been several moments of concern, or ones that at least reveal a team with six transfers and one freshman still getting to know each other. That was expected going into the season, but Indiana can’t afford it to last much longer.

The clear difference between the 2024-25 Hoosiers and last year’s group that missed the NCAA Tournament is guard play. Point guard Myles Rice is averaging 14.8 points and shooting 46.2% from 3-point range so far, a dynamic Indiana simply didn’t have last season. Sophomore wing Mackenzie Mgbako appears to have taken another step in his game, leading Indiana with 18.8 points per game and connecting on 8-of-15 3-point attempts. 

Advertisement

Woodson also has much more capable depth to work with, with veterans like Trey Galloway and Luke Goode, along with budding freshman Bryson Tucker, coming off the bench. That’s all said without mentioning Malik Reneau and Oumar Ballo, who could comprise the Big Ten’s best front court.

So where does the hesitation come from? Woodson has been unhappy with several aspects of the Hoosiers’ play this season. After a 90-55 win over Eastern Illinois, which featured a 37-36 halftime deficit, Woodson called out his team’s readiness. 

“I thought we were still home in bed asleep,” Woodson said. “It was awful.”

Indiana jumped out to a 21-5 win over UNC Greensboro, only to be tied 40-40 with 15:57 left in the second half. Indiana shot just 41.7% from the field and 26.3% from 3-point range, allowed 13 offensive rebounds and committed 13 turnovers in the win. That left a lot to be desired from Woodson, and some of the frustration stems from knowing how much talent he has on this team.

“As a team we had 16 assists. That’s awful. I mean, it’s awful. With this team, we should average between 20 and 30 assists. So the play tonight, the way we played offensively tonight was selfish as hell to me,” Woodson said.

Advertisement

“That’s something that just can’t be because we have enough guys on this team that can make basketball plays,” Woodson continued. “We’ve just got to be unselfish and sacrifice the ball for the sake of the team and good things will happen.”

Woodson and the Hoosiers have a chance to ease those concerns and pick up several quality wins. Good, bad or somewhere in between, this week will reveal a lot about this Indiana team, which needs to return to Bloomington with something to show for this trip.



Source link

Continue Reading

Indiana

Purdue vs Indiana Prediction: Odds, Expert Picks, QB Matchup, Betting Trends and Stats

Published

on

Purdue vs Indiana Prediction: Odds, Expert Picks, QB Matchup, Betting Trends and Stats


Indiana is coming off its first loss of the season and welcomes Purdue to town for Senior Day.

The Indiana Hoosiers are 10-1 with its first loss of the season coming at Ohio State (38-15). Indiana dropped to No. 10 in the AP Poll and will likely be on the backend of the teams in for the latest College Football Playoff rankings, but a convincing win here would help. Indiana has been one of the best against-the-spread (ATS) teams in the country and as a -29 point home favorite, all signs point to Curt Cignetti and company rolling.

Not much has gone right for the 1-10 Purdue Boilermakers. After the 49-0 win over FCS Indiana State, Purdue has lost 10 straight games with seven out of 10 losses coming by 17 or more points. Purdue lost to Michigan State 24-17 last week and has two OT losses this year, but this road game seems out of reach for the Boilermakers.

NBC Sports has all the latest info and analysis you need, including how to tune in for kickoff, odds from BetMGM, player news and updates, and of course our predictions and best bets for the game from our staff of experts.

Advertisement

Listen to the B1G Talk podcast with Todd Blackledge and Noah Eagle for the most compelling storylines across all ofcollege football, with the biggest teams on the rise and the latest rankings!

Game Details and How to watch Purdue @ Indiana

  • Date: Saturday, November 30, 2024
  • Time: 7:00 PM EST
  • Site: Indiana University Memorial Stadium
  • City: Bloomington, IN
  • TV/Streaming: Fox Sports 1

Want to check out the other games on the College Football schedule this week? We’ve got you covered right here on NBC Sports with all the matchup, venue, game-time and TV/streaming info so you won’t miss any of the action!

Game odds for Purdue @ Indiana

The latest odds as of Tuesday afternoon:

o Moneyline: Indiana (-6500), Purdue (+2000)

o Spread: Indiana -29 (-110)

o Total: 56.5 points

Advertisement

*odds courtesy of BetMGM

The spread opened at Indiana -25.5, so heavy money is pouring in on the Hoosiers. That is no surprise since Indiana is on the cusp of a College Football Playoff. The total has no movement.

NBC Sports Bet Best Bet

Vaughn Dalzell (@VmoneySports) has the following best bets between Purdue and Indiana:

“The Indiana Hoosiers suffered the first loss of the season last week at Ohio State (38-15) and need to bounce back dominantly to secure a College Football Playoff berth.

Indiana’s First Half Team Total is 23.5, which might seem mighty lofty, but it’s certainly within range and so is a 50-point game for the Hoosiers. At home, Indiana has scored 17, 17, 14, 31, and 21 first-half points versus DI opponents this season for 20.0 first-half points per game.

Advertisement

Purdue’s defense hasn’t taken any steps forward this season. In the last seven games, the Boilermakers have allowed 24, 21, 21, 17, 21, 24, and 21 first-half points, so this number is nothing Indiana cannot do.”

BetMGM College Football Insights: National Championship

Line movement (Last Week to Now)

  • Ohio State +320 to +275
  • Georgia +500 to +400
  • Texas +500 to +450

Highest Ticket%

  • Ohio State 13.4%
  • Texas 11.1%
  • Georgia 10.5%

Highest Handle%

  • Ohio State 15.9%
  • Georgia 14.9%
  • Alabama 12.1%

Biggest Liabilities

  • Colorado
  • Ohio State
  • Alabama

College Football talk is taking over Bet the Edge every Thursday throughout the season. Bet the EDGE is your source for all things sports betting. Get all of Vaughn Dalzell, Eric Froton, and Brad Thomas’ insights Thursdays at 6AM ET right here or wherever you get your favorite podcasts.

Quarterback matchup for Boilermakers @ Hoosiers

  • Purdue: Hudson Card threw for a season-high 342 passing yards against Michigan State last week on 26-of-47. Card has nine touchdowns to six interceptions on the year and 1,606 passing yards.
  • Indiana: Kurtis Rourke has had a phenomenal season that has begun to be derailed slightly by injury. Rourke has 274 combined passing yards in the past two games and had zero touchdowns to zero interceptions last week. On the season, Rourke has 21 touchdowns to four interceptions for 2,478 passing yards and a 69.6 completion percentage.

Boilermakers @ Hoosiers player news & recent stats

  • Purdue is 3-8 ATS this season, ranking tied for fifth-worst.
  • Indiana is 8-3 ATS this season, ranking tied for seventh-best.
  • Indiana is 8-3 to the Over this season, ranking third-best.
  • Indiana is 5-2 ATS this year at home and 4-3 to the Over.
  • Purdue is 2-3 ATS this season as the road team and 3-2 to the Over.
  • Kurtis Rouke threw for zero touchdowns and zero interceptions last week.
  • Hudson Card threw a season-high 342 passing yards last week.

Please bet responsibly. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call the National Gambling Helpline at 1-800-522-4700.

Follow our experts on socials to keep up with all the latest content from the staff:

  • Vaughn Dalzell (@VmoneySports)
  • Brad Thomas (@MrBradThomas)
  • Drew Dinsick (@whale_capper)
  • Jay Croucher (@croucherJD)
  • Eric Froton (@CFFroton)





Source link

Continue Reading

Indiana

IU trip to Bahamas will reveal a lot about Hoosiers, who can’t come home empty-handed

Published

on

IU trip to Bahamas will reveal a lot about Hoosiers, who can’t come home empty-handed


BLOOMINGTON – Indiana heads to The Bahamas this week with plenty to gain — and plenty to prove.

The Hoosiers placed virtually all their nonconference emphasis on their first-ever trip to Battle 4 Atlantis, and they cannot afford to come home without some quality wins pocketed from a Thanksgiving spent on Paradise Island.

What makes this a successful holiday tournament trip? Five thoughts …

Advertisement

Greater consistency

Through four wins in four games, we’ve seen the idea of Indiana burst through the clouds. Stretches when the Hoosiers’ array of talent and experience makes them virtually unplayable at both ends of the floor, when even a high-major opponent like South Carolina looked simply overwhelmed.

We haven’t seen it often enough, though.

In a way, that’s fine. No basketball team should be fully formed in November. Anyone playing their best right now is in big trouble come March.

But IU needs it this week. A reasonable path through this tournament will see games against top-50 competition at least once, probably multiple times. That means opportunity, but it also means the hot-and-cold performances thus far need to be smoothed over a little more. Those windows into what Indiana can be need to open a little wider this week.

Advertisement

Point guard play

Myles Rice has been outstanding through these first four games. Trey Galloway has had moments, as he continues his steady progress back to full fitness following offseason knee surgery. Indiana will need their best this week.

In settings like these, players with their creativity and experience, are crucial. Sightlines are weird. The whole environment can make shooting difficult. The teams that can force the ball to the rim and either finish or draw fouls (or both) have an added advantage.

The axiom in basketball that guards win games generally always applies. But in neutral venues, when certain elements of a team’s offense might be stunted, the ability to force action and either score or create moving downhill — something both Galloway and Rice have shown proficiency in doing — becomes invaluable. Both players must deliver in The Bahamas.

Advertisement

Rebound the ball

It was too often a problem last season, and it’s been too often a problem this season.

Yes, Indiana is playing smaller. And yes, games like UNC Greensboro can go a little sideways in this department when an overmatched opponent chucks and chases because it knows there’s little point in trying to attack the rim.

But a team with IU’s size and athleticism cannot be a sub-200 team in opponent offensive rebound rate. The Hoosiers cannot afford to be so poor in closing out possessions. This team will undermine its offensive improvement and its athletic advantages if it continues to be so poor on the glass.

Indiana doesn’t need to be (and probably won’t ever be) dominant here. That’s not how the Hoosiers are constructed. But they are and must be better than they’ve been so far in this area, and three games in three days against demanding competition will require immediate improvement.

Advertisement

Mackenzie Mgbako’s continued growth

Indiana’s leading scorer had his quietest game of the season Thursday, scoring just nine points on 2-of-11 shooting and seeing his second-half playing time eaten into by Bryson Tucker’s bench performance. Everyone’s allowed a bad day at the office.

But Mgbako would do well to ensure he leaves those at home this week. IU’s most dynamic offensive player early in the season, Mgbako has flashed three-level scoring potential the likes of which few players with his size and athleticism can claim.

Few teams, even good ones, have adequate cover for a 6-8 wing who can shoot from multiple levels and finish around the rim the way Mgbako does. Couple that to improved rebounding and defense, and when he’s on, Mgbako is perhaps this team’s biggest individual game changer.

A microcosm of his team’s task this time of year, Mgbako needs to strive for consistency in those areas. Make the off nights few and far between. Find ways to impact games in multiple ways, and shift the way he scores to suit what his opponent struggles against.

Advertisement

This week is a good test for Indiana, and it’s certainly a good test for Mackenzie Mgbako. Both will get a better look at their ceiling in Atlantis.

Quality wins

It’s the simplest and most important storyline following Indiana to the islands.

The Hoosiers put all their faith in this tournament, in terms of being able to add quality to their NCAA tournament in nonconference play. Barring a surprise breakout from South Carolina, IU isn’t likely to beat anyone of meaning from a NET perspective anywhere but in Atlantis.

That represents a calculated gamble for Mike Woodson, whose program learned the hard way how far behind the eight ball an empty-calorie nonconference resume can set a team from an NCAA tournament perspective. The Hoosiers cannot repeat that this year.

Which means they need to make hay in the sunshine in Atlantis. Louisville might stand up as a decent win, somewhere between Quads 1 and 2. Gonzaga and/or Arizona would be worthwhile scalps. Oklahoma, Providence and West Virginia all might be in time.

Advertisement

Whatever its performances, Indiana needs to leave The Bahamas with some wins, or it will leave itself with a lot to do in conference play to ensure Selection Sunday isn’t a stressful experience.

Listen to Mind Your Banners, our IU Athletics-centric podcast, on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending