Indiana
Bills to employ school chaplains, allow religious instruction move forward in Indiana legislature – Indiana Capital Chronicle
Lines between church and state blurred at the Indiana Statehouse on Wednesday as lawmakers gave the go-ahead for two education bills that seek to increase students’ access to faith leaders and religious instruction.
One proposal, House Bill 1137, would require schools to approve parental requests for students to leave school during the day for religious instruction. A separate measure, Senate Bill 50, could bring paid chaplains into Indiana’s public schools. Both bills advanced from their assigned committees and now head to the respective chambers for further consideration.
“Quite simply, this just gives the parent more control over their student,” said Rep. Kendell Culp, R-Rensselaer, who authored the House bill. “If the students can go off-site and learn character qualities, and become better students, they’re going to have a greater experience in the classroom, and I think that’s really important.”
In the opposite chamber, Sen. Stacey Donato, R-Logansport, said her bill can help traditional school counselors who are struggling to manage large caseloads and increasing numbers of students in need.
“We are just trying to provide another tool for schools to help with the production of great students … offering an option for a chaplain to come in and assist,” she said.
Guaranteed time for religious instruction
Culp’s bill aims to tighten existing Indiana law that already permits students to leave school for up to 120 minutes a week for voluntary religious instruction, as long as it takes place off school property, and private transportation is provided.
A 1952 U.S. Supreme Court ruling affirmed that“released time” programs are constitutional nationwide. As such, Hoosier parents can request religious instruction time for their child, but school administrators do not have to give approval.
Under the house bill, that “veto power” over the parent goes away, Culp said.
The bill — which passed unanimously — stipulates that when a parent of a public school student provides a written request, the principal “shall” allow the student to attend outside religious instruction that is organized by a church or religious organization.
The legislation also says a school principal must work “in a collaborative manner” with the parent to find the best time during the school day for a student to leave the school.
“That’s very important, because we don’t want to interrupt the school day with students leaving at multiple times,” Culp said. “It’s best to work together to make sure that we don’t have an interruption of that critical instruction that takes place during the school day.”
An amendment to the bill adopted on Wednesday additionally clarifies that students who are habitually truant — those who have 10 or more unexcused absences — would not automatically qualify for religious instruction release. Students must also “be in academic good standing,” though lawmakers said they could amend that language on the House floor to be more specific.
“I want to give kids this opportunity, for sure. But I want to make sure that they’re not behind — or contribute to falling further behind,” said Rep. Bob Behning, R-Indianapolis, who chairs the House education committee.
Multiple organizations around the state — mainly Christian-centered — offer out-of-school curriculum for religious teaching, Culp said.
One of those, Ohio-based LifeWise Academy, currently serves more than 80% of elementary schoolers in northwest Indiana’s West Central School Corporation.
“These programs emphasize character,” said Dennis Guttwein, who serves on the district school board. “Teaching from the Bible — it is full of character that is sorely lacking in our society today. Things like honesty, humility, integrity, patience.”
The program is now in its third year at West Central. Guttwein said students are allowed to leave school once a week, during a designated “library time.”
Joel Penton, founder and CEO of LifeWise, said the program actively serves more than 300 schools across more than a dozen U.S. cities. nationwide. Every week, nearly 30,000 public school students attend LifeWise Bible classes, he noted.
“We know that parents desperately want Bible education for their students as part of their public school day,” Penton said. “However, we’re aware that it’s simply not feasible for many, many of those families.”
He emphasized that LifeWise is “entirely voluntary,” and “zero core academic classes are missed” by students who choose to attend.
When asked why the programming couldn’t take place after school, Penton maintained that many students still need to catch the bus to get home, and others are already involved in after-school extracurriculars.
He said, too, that non-participating students and families “are not really affected in any meaningful way.”
But Chris Lagoni, executive director of the Indiana Small and Rural Schools Association, said it’s difficult to avoid disruptions in a school when dozens — even hundreds — of students are leaving for an organized program.
“We have to be careful. Let’s say the Archdiocese comes to the table and says, ‘Well, we’d like to offer our own program, and the local mosque comes forward and says, ‘Well, we’d like to own our own program,’” Lagoni said in an example. “Looking down the road, how do you implement this when you’re dealing with multiple entities that are trying to get everybody to the table to agree upon a time that works and has minimal instructional interruption?”
Lagoni also recommended an amendment to ensure students can not leave school during state standardized testing times.
Lisa Tanselle, general counsel for the Indiana School Boards Association (ISBA), said the organization representing all 290 school corporations across the state is opposed to the bill.
“We want to preserve the academic day for students. That doesn’t mean we are opposed or don’t appreciate the value of religious instruction,” she said. “This statute is designed to allow individual parents the opportunity to come to school officials and request release time for their students for up to 120 minutes. We believe that the current statute is working, and those requests are being accommodated for the vast majority of parents that make the request.”
Secular support throughout Hoosier schools
Testimony and discussion in the Senate education committee proved more tense.
Donato said her bill aims to give schools “an option to add additional resources for emotional needs of students.”
Chaplains can already volunteer at public schools. The measure makes clear they can be employed to provide “secular support” to students and school employees, given they have a master’s degree in divinity, theology, religious studies, or a related field, as well as two years of “counseling experience.”
Donato further emphasized that chaplains “must follow the same rules as school counselors,” including mandatory reporting of child abuse — although the bill does not say so, explicitly.
ISBA executive director Terry Spradlin said the bill “is structured in a good way” to give school districts a “local option” to hire or receive chaplains as volunteers.
Representing the Indiana School Counselors Association, Scott Carr said the group supports the proposal, but recommended additional language to ensure that chaplains who work with students are familiar with the developing brain counseling of adolescent children.
He pointed to similar bills that have already moved forward in states like Ohio and Texas.
Although Donato maintained that students don’t have to meet with a chaplain or traditional school counselor if they don’t want to, conservative attorney Jim Bopp — who testified in support of the bill — read the language differently.
“Children have very limited legal and developmental competency to make decisions for themselves. The vast majority of decisions are made by parents — and this is one that they are perfectly competent and capable of, and in the best interest of the children, would consent to. And it doesn’t matter that the kid doesn’t want to,” Bopp said. “The kid doesn’t want to go to church on Sunday morning. Is that child abuse to say, ‘Okay, Johnny get up, and we’re taking you into church?’”
The provision in question dictates that a student, employee or parent can additionally permit a chaplain to provide “nonsecular advice, guidance and support.”
Democrats held that could go against the wishes of a student or parents “who aren’t on the same page.”
Chris Daley, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Indiana, agreed, saying language in the bill that allows parents to direct a chaplain to provide religious counseling to the students “is a form of coercion outside of the school environment.”
“That is a liberty issue that we do believe infringes on the constitutional rights of those students,” Daley said.
“Focusing this only on chaplains and not other members of the community who would like to fill this role, certainly does implicate Establishment Clause issues,” he continued, referring to the First Amendment. “Indiana has chaplains in any number of areas of public life. We do not have them in our schools in an official capacity for exactly this reason.”
Members of the minority caucus voted against the measure in committee and said they would rather focus directly on Indiana’s ongoing school counselor “crisis.”
A ‘crisis’ of their own: Indiana school counselors detail overwhelming duties, pushing some out
Gray Lesesne, pastor at Christ Church Cathedral in Indianapolis, also pushed back, telling lawmakers he feels “no way prepared or qualified — either academically or professionally — to serve as a secular counselor or academic advisor or a chaplain in a public school.”
He said most seminaries do not require courses in counseling childhood or youth psychosocial development.
Lesesne said he worried the legislation would also make it difficult for chaplain to maintain “appropriate professional boundaries.”
“Even if I were to dispense secular advice to a young person as a chaplain, they would have a difficult time separating me from my role and calling, and could interpret that as religious counseling — whether that was intended by me or not,” he said. “I believe there is a place for clergy and people of faith in schools, and that is serving as a volunteer. … That is what chaplains are trained to do. We are not licensed, trained or called to serve in secular settings, or as mental health professionals or counselors.”
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Indiana
Nick Saban gives thoughts on Kalen DeBoer, Alabama’s blowout loss to Indiana
Nick Saban had a chance to weigh in on the state of Alabama football after 2025 on Wednesday on the Pat McAfee Show.
McAfee questioned whether Alabama should have hired a Saban disciple to replace him considering all four coaches left in the playoff once worked for Saban at Alabama.
“I think if somebody was available, I’m not sure anybody was available that they could have maybe gotten to come here,” Saban said. “I do think that Kalen DeBoer is a really good coach and doing a good job here.”
Saban highlighted the “tough transition” DeBoer underwent with all of the players coming and going.
“So that’s a lot to overcome for anybody,” Saban said. “It would have been a lot to overcome for even for one of the guys that formerly coached for me.”
Saban then said he “fully supports” Alabama athletics director Greg Byrne, what he’s done and how the administrator has done it.
“I’m hoping they get the ship going in the right direction here,” Saban said. “It’s not bad to get in the playoffs and finish you know in the final eight, but not the expectation around here, which is tough to live up to sometimes.”
During his appearance on McAfee, Saban also talked some about Indiana and what the Hoosiers did to beat Alabama 38-3 in the Rose Bow.
“Indiana man, I mean they were impressive in the game,” Saban said. “Not that Alabama played great, and they made some mistakes early on that hurt them … These cats, man. Everybody talks about their offense. They’ve got some dawgs on defense now. These guys play hard, they play fast, they play together, they don’t make a lot of mental mistakes. They’re well coached. They fit the runs. This pop they put on Ty (Simpson) right here. …. Incredible the job they’ve done at Indiana. Curt Cig has done a fantastic job there.”
Indiana
Our childhoods were awesome. Let’s legalize kids playing outside. | Opinion
We loved our free-range childhoods. Now we’re fighting to make sure Hoosier parents won’t get arrested for giving their kids the same freedom.
The link between addictive screen time and mental health
A recent study has found a link between social media addiction, phone and video game addiction, and a higher risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviors.
unbranded – Lifestyle
It’s tempting to think Democrats and Republicans can’t agree on anything these days, but the two of us wholeheartedly agree on this:
Our childhoods were awesome.
In fact, we loved our childhoods so much, we are co-sponsoring a bill that would ensure Indiana parents can let their kids enjoy their childhoods just as much. Under our bill, parents can let their kids play outside, walk to the store, romp in the woods and stomp in the rain without worrying that this wonderful independence could be mistaken for neglect.
The so-called “Reasonable Childhood Independence” bill has been passed in 11 states so far — red, blue, and purple. It is not a free pass for abusive parents. It is reassurance for all decent Hoosiers that they don’t have to worry about being investigated or arrested for giving their kids some unsupervised time.
House Bill 1035 simply says that “neglect” is when you put your child in obvious and serious danger — not anytime you take your eyes off them. This helps parents who want to give their kids a longer leash. And it helps parents in poverty who have little choice but to do so — for instance, a single mom working two jobs who lets her kid come home with a latchkey.
It also helps all the parents desperate to get their kids off screens: You take away the phone — and open the door.
Our own childhoods were as outdoors and free range as they come. Jake grew up in Michiana, running around, looking for trees to build tree houses in. Other times he’d jump on his bike and go to the ballpark with friends, or go get a burger or even, yes, some Big League Chew.
Victoria biked all over the place, too — after telling her parents where she was heading. (No cell phones back then.) There was a hill everyone loved to ride down and a 7-Eleven where she’d go with her friends for lunch, which consisted of … a Slurpee. Yes, your elected representatives made some slightly suboptimal choices as kids. That’s part of growing up. It was a magical time.
It was also foundational. Jake works in commercial construction when he’s not legislating. He credits the give-and-take of those unsupervised ballgames with building the client skills he uses to this day. (And maybe the tree houses launched his career in construction.)
Victoria went on to become an associate professor and program director in occupational therapy at Indiana University. Working with young kids, she has seen the slow decline in developmental milestones as the run-around childhood got replaced by a sedentary, screen-based one.
That’s another reason we are so keen to pass this bill. Autonomy isn’t something “nice” to have. It is crucial. We all know about the youth mental health crisis. Let’s make it at least as easy for kids to go outside as it is for them to go online.
Some people may think the reason a supervised, structured childhood has become so normal is because the crime rate is so high. But the murder rate today is lower than it was in the 1970s, ‘80s and ‘90s.
The Reasonable Childhood Independence bill allows parents to decide for themselves when their kids are ready to do some things on their own.
“As parents, you have a good understanding of where your children are on their level of responsibility,” says Rep. Ryan Lauer, Vice Chair of the House Family and Children Committee, who is also co-sponsoring this bill.
And yet we’ve all heard the stories of decent parents being investigated simply because they didn’t hover — like that mom in Georgia, Brittany Patterson, arrested in 2024 because her 10-year-old walked to town without telling her. Or that mom in South Carolina, Debra Harrell, a few years back. She let her daughter, 9, play at a popular sprinkler park while she worked her shift at McDonald’s. For this, Harrell was thrown in jail and had her daughter taken from her for 17 days.
As parents, we shudder at the thought of overreach like that. We also shudder at the thought of child abuse. By narrowing the definition of neglect, our law gives hardworking Department of Child Services personnel more time to focus on the kids who are truly in danger.
Hoosier parents deserve the freedom to take their eyes off their kids when they know their kids are ready. Hoosier kids deserve to enjoy that freedom. And if they use it to make a tree house or drink a Slurpee for lunch, well, that’s not against the law.
Rep. Jake Teshka represents Indiana’s 7th District (St. Joseph, Marshall and LaPorte counties). Rep. Victoria Garcia Wilburn represents Indiana’s 32nd District (Marion and Hamilton counties).
Indiana
Pride organizers, ACLU sue Indiana city again, saying it defied court
Supreme court declines Tennessee vanity plate free speech appeal
Lawyers for a Tennessee woman challenging the rejection of her “69PWNDU” personalized plate argued state rules have led to a “dizzying array of censorship.”
An LGBTQ advocacy group is once again suing Loogootee, Indiana, claiming the city is ignoring a recent court decision ruling its actions unconstitutional and is pushing its festival out of the public square illegally.
The Southern Indiana city of 2,600 people and festival organizer Patoka Valley AIDS Community Action Group have fought for years over LGBTQ expression on city property, specifically where the annual PrideFest would be held.
The city had enacted a special events policy that would prevent the group from holding the festival at the public square downtown. The U.S. District Court of Southern Indiana handed the city a major defeat in August, ruling that the policy was too broad and violated organizers’ First Amendment rights.
Now, Loogootee has enacted another special events policy that mirrors several measures in the one that the court struck down. In response, the Indiana chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, which represents Pakota Valley, filed a new lawsuit against the policy and filed a motion alleging the city is disobeying court orders.
“Court orders must be complied with, and Loogootee, by enacting an ordinance that contains provisions enjoined by the Court, is in contempt of its lawful orders,” ACLU Indiana legal director Ken Falk said in a news release. “Moreover, the ordinance it has adopted continues Loogootee’s pattern of attempting to unconstitutionally restrict this celebration of the LGBTQ+ community.”
The new legal twist is the most recent development in what’s been a tense local culture war between the LGBTQ+ community seeking to publicly celebrate their identity and the strong, sometimes threatening, community pushback to their efforts.
Is Loogootee’s ‘new’ policy new?
Judge Richard L. Young listed three primary factors in his August ruling as to why he found Loogootee’s old policy unconstitutional: a 45-day event permit application deadline, small group thresholds, and event location limits. He also disagreed with the city’s health and safety reasoning for such rules.
Public institutions can legally establish restrictions on the time, place and manner of free expression as long as these restrictions are narrowly tailored.
Enacted Dec. 29, the new ordinance reuses the same language regarding the permit deadline and small groups but broadens the locations where an event can be held. Instead of limiting an event to one of two places, an event can now be held anywhere except within 240 feet of the town center’s fountain.
In its complaint, the ACLU argued that the “verbatim” measures and the new location restriction are all unconstitutional.
“The ‘new’ Ordinance is therefore ‘new’ in name only and, in reality, Loogootee has simply reenacted provisions that this Court has explicitly enjoined as unconstitutional,” the ACLU’s complaint reads.
Loogootee Mayor Brian Ader previously told IndyStar that the city planned to appeal the District Court’s decision, but an appeal was never filed.
The USA TODAY Network – Indiana’s coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners.
Have a story to tell? Reach Cate Charron by email at ccharron@indystar.com, on X at @CateCharron or Signal at @cate.charron.28.
-
News1 week agoFor those who help the poor, 2025 goes down as a year of chaos
-
Detroit, MI4 days ago2 hospitalized after shooting on Lodge Freeway in Detroit
-
Georgia1 week ago
Best in Georgia: 2025 AJC Varsity high school football all-state teams
-
Dallas, TX3 days agoDefensive coordinator candidates who could improve Cowboys’ brutal secondary in 2026
-
Detroit, MI1 week agoWith 46k outages around Michigan, Metro Detroit prepares for power loss
-
Southeast1 week agoMurder in small-town America: The crimes that tore quiet communities apart in 2025
-
Miami, FL1 week agoMiami-Dade sheriff’s deputy opens fire on vehicle after altercation during traffic stop, officials say
-
Midwest1 week agoMcDonald’s locks doors to keep out individuals who present ‘a risk’ in crime-ridden Minneapolis area

