Movie Reviews
MOVIE REVIEWS: “Now You See Me: Now You Don’t,” “The Running Man,” “Trap House” and “Keeper” – Valdosta Daily Times
“Now You See Me: Now You Don’t”
(Crime/Thriller: 1 hour, 53 minutes)
Starring: Jesse Eisenberg, Woody Harrelson, Dave Franco
Director: Ruben Fleischer
Rated: PG-13 (Strong language, violence and suggestive references. )
Movie Review:
This heist movie is the sequel to 2016’s “Now You See Me,” also directed Ruben Fleischer. It is entertaining just like his predecessor. However, more implausibility exists with “Now You See Me: Now You Don’t” than its prequel.
This outing, The Horsemen illusionists and three new young magicians, Bosco (Dominic Sessa), Charlie (Justice Smith) and June (Ariana Greenblatt), set out to take down the Vanderbilt corporation led by Veronika Vanderberg (Rosamund Pike). Their task will not be easy, but the magician’s use of sleight of hand and tricks help with their mission.
Much like the “Fast and the Furious” movies, the antics here are not always tangible, though they are enjoyable. The entertaining action scenes, mixed with the comical banter, even when juvenile, make the film worth it.
Think of this movie as a reunion for the magicians and the initiation of three freshmen. The new magicians take the lead in this film and in some ways overshadow their older counterparts. Think of this as a passing of the torch to a new generation.
The problem is that the old cast members are still dynamic and not just generational cookie-cutter characters. Jesse Eisenberg and Woody Harrelson’s comedic repartee is still a highlight of this movie. While the younger cast is talented, the older cast members are the reason moviegoers return, and that is the razzle dazzle that makes “Now You See Me: Now You Don’t” inviting.
Grade: B- (It is not as magical as it once was, but it still charms.)
“The Running Man”
(Action/Science-Fiction: 2 hours, 13 minutes)
Starring: Glen Powell, Colman Domingo and Josh Brolin
Director: Edgar Wright
Rated: R (strong violence, some gore, and strong language)
Movie Review:
“The Running Man” is a remake of the 1987 film with Arnold Schwarzenegger and directed by Paul Michael Glaser. Both screenplays feature a future dystopian America based on the novel by Stephen King. The 1987 movie was much more plausible than the current one, yet this version is still very entertaining thanks to the performance of Glen Powell, the newest action hero.
Glen Powell plays Ben Richards, a husband and father to a very sick young daughter. Richards decides the easiest way for his daughter and wife to remain healthy and have a secure future is to become a competitor on The Running Man reality show. Sponsored by the state-controlled Network, the show features a person trying to survive while violently hunted by several so-called patriots. Richards realizes he may have just made one of the biggest mistakes of his life, but after signing a contract, he cannot back out so he becomes a running man.
Again, the 1983 movie maintained a realistic appeal this new version misses. The original also had better lines such as a Schwarzenegger and Richard Dawson sequence. Schwarzenegger’s Ben Richards says, “Killian, I’ll be back,” and Damon Killian, played by former Family Feud host Richard Dawson, responds, “Only in a rerun.”
This new adaptation involves contestants like Richards out in the public where bystanders are killed — sounds like lawsuits waiting to happen all over the place. But the Network is more a part of the US government in this movie, so the Network has a modus operandi where people at home watching seem to enjoy the violence.
Not all citizens appreciate the running man show in this movie, and that at least is something tangible to hold on to. If America ever gets to this point in real life, we have hit a major low point of no point of return.
That aside, the other thing that makes this movie interesting is Glen Powell . He is believable as a leading man, and he works here. And, Powell is definitely athletic because he does plenty of running here.
Grade: B- (If you are in shape, run with him.)
“Trap House”
(Crime: 1 hour, 42 minutes)
Starring: Dave Bautista, Jack Champion and Bobby Cannavale
Director: Michael Dowse
Rated: R (Strong violence and bloody imagery)
Movie Review:
“Trap House” is an interesting movie mainly because it tries something different. That difference is not realistic in several scenes, but one must compliment the writers for trying. Part of the reason this movie seems unlikely is the missed opportunities for dramatic moments, which could help viewers get to know the characters better.
Dave Bautista plays Ray Seale a single father and DEA agent supervisor. He and his team have been tracking cartel crimes in El Paso, Texas. After his son Cody (Champion) sees some of the cartel information at his father’s office, the young man gathers three of his friends to rob cartel trap houses to raise money for the son of a murdered DEA agent who was killed in the line of duty. Soon, Ray must contemplate whether he should put duty above family when he finds out about his son‘s extracurricular activities.
“Trap House” finds a way to make it itself interesting, yet it remains a trap too. Characters keep doing the same thing even when it seems unusual for their very nature. Just when it looks like some of the characters are about to do the correct action, they do not, and this script misses key moments for the dramatic development of characters. This crime photoplay does rebound with a very engaging apex.
Grade: B- (It’s a trap, but it is an entertaining one).
“Keeper”
(Horror: 1 hour, 39 minutes)
Starring: Tatiana Maslany, Rossif Sutherland and Birkett Turton
Director: Osgood Perkins
Rated: R (Violent content/gore, strong language, and sexual references)
Movie Review:
“Keeper” is a horror movie by director Osgood Perkins (“Longlegs,” 2024), the son of famed actor Anthony Perkins. For a moment, it manages to create a neat psychological thriller. It has only a few frights, but they are effective. Then, writer Nick Lepard’s script becomes something similar to a women’s empowerment movie and loses the edge it had.
Liz, a painter, travels to a countryside estate with her boyfriend Malcom, a doctor, for a romantic getaway. He tells her he thinks she is the one. Malcom‘s brother Darren (Turton) agrees and tells him that Liz is a keeper. Supernatural occurrences happen to Liz, especially after her husband goes to see one of his clients and leaves her in the big house for a lengthy period of time.
“Keeper” is a movie you have to watch very closely, or it will seem like a character or two may go missing from scene to scene. Even more, audiences must understand what is happening, which is common in psychological thrillers. Still nothing seems to happen for long periods of runtime. Then, characters explain what is happening, and it becomes a less potent fairytale with visual monsters.
Grade: C+ (do not keep it.)
Movie Reviews
‘Are We Having Fun Yet?’
Photo: Universal/Everett Collection
Like being asphyxiated in a ball pit filled with candy, the experience of watching The Super Mario Galaxy Movie is at once kaleidoscopic and nerve-wracking. It pantomimes the hallmarks of a good time, with a fast, forced cheeriness; the flashing lights, bright colors, sparkly design, and subplot-happy narrative are there to hold our attention and charm us, but they accomplish the opposite, instead making us worry about what we’re missing. At one point there’s a throwaway bit involving a roller coaster that dives into a pit of lava, eventually emerging with all its passengers transformed into happy skeletons; maybe we are supposed to be those happy skeletons, drained of life and loving it. The good news (or is it the bad news?) is that this is a kids’ movie and nobody cares what “we” think. Its predecessor, 2023’s Super Mario Bros. Movie, made more than $1.3 billion worldwide, and no one should be surprised if this one does something similar.
That first movie wasn’t particularly accomplished either, but it had a slick simplicity that one could sort of lose oneself in and some clever bits involving our heroes, Brooklyn plumber brothers Mario (Chris Pratt) and Luigi (Charlie Day), as well as a lively turn by Jack Black as the bloviating turtle-demon Bowser. The sequel, by contrast, is turbo-loaded with character, incident, themes, never pausing to let us appreciate anything. Though directors Aaron Horvath and Michael Jelenic do apparently want us to care: The Super Mario Galaxy Movie centers around families destroyed and reclaimed, a sentence I can’t believe I just typed. The film’s chief villain, the spasmodic Bowser Jr. (voiced by Benny Safdie), seeks to save his father, the now-docile Bowser, from neutered captivity. As part of his devious plan (I think?), Junior kidnaps Princess Rosalina (Brie Larson) from her space-faring observatory dominion, where she plays mother to a race of puffy, colorful star children known as Lumas. Rosalina loves to read her kids heroic stories about Princess Peach (Anya Taylor-Joy), her long-lost sister, ruler of the Mushroom Kingdom and Mario’s main object of desire. Such attempts to infuse depth into the film’s carnivalesque cacophony could have been something, but corporate flatness consumes all. The ideas about family aren’t explored or developed, merely repeated.
But like I said, it’s a kids’ film, and younger children will be distracted by the aforementioned cute little star-baby things, by the cute little mushroom-head guys, by the frantic speed at which everything comes at us, and by the film’s vision of the universe as a series of amusement parks, with each world in this galaxy seemingly its own funfair. If only all this chaos didn’t feel so strained, so polished and programmed, so, so … unchaotic. The movie is also filled with Easter eggs from many decades’ worth of Mario video games, which will surely reassure devoted fans of those games that all is right with the world and someone loves them. (Full disclosure: I haven’t played any of them. Back when I was a kid and had to cold turkey myself from video games entirely, I’m pretty sure Donkey Kong was as far as I got in the incipient Mario universe.) The best of these aforementioned callouts is the appearance of the Han Solo–like Star Fox (voiced by Glen Powell), a character from a different set of Nintendo games, who arrives accompanied by his own hand-animated, hyper credit sequence. More of that, please.
Of the rest of the star-laden voice cast, Safdie and Black are the only others who make an impression. As before, Bowser has been realized with an eye (and an ear) for Black’s own grandiose, mock-operatic mannerisms, and Safdie seems to have appropriated them for the character’s offspring. Black, of course, was also the star of last year’s entertaining hit A Minecraft Movie, which got a ton of mileage out of the actor’s unique mix of irony and roaring sincerity, using him to hold together its ramshackle, faux-DIY vibe. That film was a good example of this type of material handled with something resembling charm. We could also point to something older like The LEGO Movie as a model of a brand-management enterprise that managed to be irreverent and thoughtful (and, indeed, brilliant) at the same time. All The Super Mario Galaxy Movie has, unfortunately, is the messianic fervor with which it throws everything at us. Well, that, and the mountains of money it will surely make. Me, I’ll take my travel stipend and go home.
Movie Reviews
Blaming Reviews Won’t Save a Film – Gulte
At the success meet of Band Melam last night, several actors and the director voiced strong complaints about film reviews. Some said reviews are damaging films badly, while other actor even questioned producer satirically why reviewers were not “managed.” One speaker even suggested that critics should wait a few days before sharing their opinions.
However, the bigger issue seems to be something else. The team successfully brought back the hit “Court” pair, expecting that their previous popularity would automatically pull audiences to theatres. While the chemistry between the lead pair still works to an extent, that alone cannot guarantee success. Audiences today expect a strong story and engaging narration, not just familiar faces.
This argument about reviews also misses a basic point. Reviews, whether positive or negative, are usually based on how the film actually feels to the viewer. Audiences along with reviews, They also check trailers, songs, and public talk before making a decision.
If a film truly connects with people, no amount of negative reviews can stop it. Social media quickly reflects genuine audience reactions, and strong content always finds support.
When a film fails to create that impact, blaming reviews becomes an easy excuse. Instead of targeting critics, filmmakers need to focus on delivering better content.
At the same event, producer Bekkem Venugopal made a sensible point that everyone should do their own job. Filmmakers should focus on making good films, and critics should share honest opinions.
Related
Tags Band melam
Movie Reviews
The Super Mario Galaxy Movie First Reviews: Flashy, Fun, and Made For Fans
Mario, Luigi, Princess Peach, Toad, Bowser, and more Nintendo favorites are back in The Super Mario Galaxy Movie, which opens in theaters this week. The first reviews of the animated video game adaptation are now online and mixed. Some say it’s even better than the previous feature, 2023’s The Super Mario Bros. Movie, while others say it’s so much worse. Of course, either way, the fans will still eat it up, and it’s made specifically for them.
Here’s what critics are saying about The Super Mario Galaxy Movie:
Does it live up to expectations?
If the first film got you on the train, just know this sequel isn’t losing any passengers anytime soon; it’s simply picking up speed.
— David Gonzalez, The Cinematic Reel
I was surprised, like anyone, to enjoy The Super Mario Galaxy Movie…The sequel levels up.
— M.N. Miller, InSession Film
It never stops feeling like the product of someone mashing lifeless action figures together.
— Wilson Chapman, IndieWire
It’s more a loud, overstuffed reel of loosely connected comedy and action beats presented in mind-boggling onslaughts of color and detail.
— Eli Friedberg, Slant Magazine
How does it compare to the first movie?
It’s a far superior sequel to The Super Mario Bros. Movie.
— M.N. Miller, InSession Film
The operative word for this sequel to 2023’s smash hit The Super Mario Bros. Movie is “more,” as in more action, more characters, more Easter eggs, more everything.
— Frank Scheck, The Hollywood Reporter
The Super Mario Galaxy Movie offers a similar mind-numbing experience.
— Wilson Chapman, IndieWire
The first movie… was one of the best animated films in years. The Super Mario Galaxy Movie is one of the worst.
— Owen Gleiberman, Variety
Is it mostly for the fans?
The sequel hits the sweet spot in terms of what its target audience wants.
— Frank Scheck, The Hollywood Reporter
It may feel like more of the same to some, but anything that takes me back to a CRT TV and SNES is a feeling I’ll take 100 out of 100 times.
— David Gonzalez, The Cinematic Reel
While the film leans into “newer” character tendencies to attract younger viewers, it honors the original enough to embrace both the old and the new with enjoyable results.
— M.N. Miller, InSession Film
Will anyone else enjoy it?
Adult non-aficionados will find little of interest other than the starry vocal cast.
— Frank Scheck, The Hollywood Reporter
This isn’t a film that’s going to win over its skeptics.
— David Gonzalez, The Cinematic Reel
How is the animation and world-building?
This may be one of the studio’s best-looking efforts yet, with The Super Mario Galaxy Movie feeling even more visually alive than its already stunning predecessor.
— Frank Scheck, The Hollywood Reporter
Featuring some of the most beautiful and dazzling animation you will ever see, it is, at times, truly jaw-dropping.
— M.N. Miller, InSession Film
There’s no sense of discovery when it comes to these planets, meticulously created to resemble the games without nary a wrinkle of surprise to be found.
— Wilson Chapman, IndieWire

Are there plenty of Easter eggs?
Even though the Star Fox character is nothing more than a way to introduce a sequel, the other supporting characters and easter eggs throughout are richly rewarding.
— M.N. Miller, InSession Film
It’s as if it exists only for us to pick out the game-referencing background details in panoramic action shots… and to threaten us with us with a Super Smash Bros. cinematic universe, given the multiversal cameos by non-Super Mario Nintendo characters.
— Eli Friedberg, Slant Magazine
The film keeps throwing things at you. It’s an orgy of video-game Easter eggs.
— Owen Gleiberman, Variety
Is the action worthy of the source material?
The action is exciting and inventive.
— M.N. Miller, InSession Film
The film’s surplus of action and chase scenes follows the same rigid formula of swooping camera movements and game power-up deus ex machinas that no sequence ever proves particularly exciting.
— Wilson Chapman, IndieWire
Does the movie’s pace seem to have gotten a mushroom boost?
The Super Mario Galaxy Movie doesn’t leave you time to catch your breath.
— Frank Scheck, The Hollywood Reporter
Most of the time, the film exists to speed-shuttle audiences to the next visually overwhelming set piece.
— Eli Friedberg, Slant Magazine
If anything, the film only loses energy as it goes on, with the final confrontation proving particularly anemic and rushed, as if the film is hurrying along to avoid having to delve into its storylines with more than a surface skim.
— Wilson Chapman, IndieWire

How is the script?
Matthew Fogel’s screenplay, which mostly pays lavish fan service to its inspiration, also weaves in a few emotional elements.
— Frank Scheck, The Hollywood Reporter
It isn’t aiming to be a grand, life-affirming story, but pure escapism. That approach doesn’t always land, but when it does, it delivers a charming, whimsical ride.
— David Gonzalez, The Cinematic Reel
The sequel’s plot is unusually heartfelt, with the villains being three-dimensional, which is welcome.
— M.N. Miller, InSession Film
The Super Mario Galaxy Movie doesn’t have a story to tell or themes to express so much as stick to a mandate of audience boxes to check.
— Eli Friedberg, Slant Magazine
Does it do a good job adapting the game?
It has a story that embraces the simplicity of the original game.
— David Gonzalez, The Cinematic Reel
While [it’s] all clearly designed to appeal to young gamers, I don’t mean that the film replicates the experience of playing one of the Super Mario Bros. games. The first movie actually did.
— Owen Gleiberman, Variety
Somehow on screen, it all registers as flat, imagination packaged into the most cleanly corporate and focus-group approved form possible.
— Wilson Chapman, IndieWire

Is it funny?
Most of the jokes land, ranging from cute to amusing to downright funny.
— M.N. Miller, InSession Film
There’s a funny visual gag revolving around Mario’s inability to draw. And there are some amusing lines that seem designed to make us feel like we’re in on the jokes.
— Frank Scheck, The Hollywood Reporter
One of the most successful gags in the movie is essentially a reskin of the famous Sloth DMV bit in Zootopia.
— Wilson Chapman, IndieWire
How’s the voice cast?
The voice cast delivers across the board.
— David Gonzalez, The Cinematic Reel
It’s an embarrassment of vocal riches… Many of the stars’ contributions here, especially those of Black and Glover, are outstanding.
— Frank Scheck, The Hollywood Reporter
Is Yoshi a great addition?
Donald Glover taps into a Groot-like tone for Yoshi, and it works surprisingly well.
— David Gonzalez, The Cinematic Reel
Don’t expect him to get that much to do, though: he’s here because he’s an iconic character rather than as a part of the story.
— Wilson Chapman, IndieWire

Are the villains still the best characters?
I found myself relating to the bratty Bowser Jr. way more than the lead heroes.
— Wilson Chapman, IndieWire
The real standout is Jack Black and Bennie Safdie as Bowser and Bowser Jr.
— David Gonzalez, The Cinematic Reel
Somehow, two Bowsers add up to less of a wowser than one.
— Owen Gleiberman, Variety
Does it have any other major problems?
The Super Mario Galaxy Movie doesn’t necessarily fix the frustrations that held the first film back. The story still leans thin, certain characters feel underutilized, and those looking for something deeper won’t suddenly find it here.
— David Gonzalez, The Cinematic Reel
Charlie Day offers nothing to the Luigi character other than, to put it politely, a distinct voice that brings a beloved character down, which is grating.
— M.N. Miller, InSession Film
Will it leave us wanting more?
There’s a distinct romantic vibe between Mario and Princess Peach (which I can’t wait to be explored in the next installment).
— Frank Scheck, The Hollywood Reporter
The Super Mario Galaxy Movie is a fun placeholder while we wait for a Super Mario Bros. film worthy of the titular characters that fans deserve.
— M.N. Miller, InSession Film
The Super Mario Galaxy Movie opens in theaters on April 1, 2026.
Thumbnail image by ©Amazon MGM Studios
Find Something Fresh! Discover What to Watch, Read Reviews, Leave Ratings and Build Watchlists. Download the Rotten Tomatoes App.
-
South-Carolina4 days agoSouth Carolina vs TCU predictions for Elite Eight game in March Madness
-
Miami, FL6 days agoJannik Sinner’s Girlfriend Laila Hasanovic Stuns in Ab-Revealing Post Amid Miami Open
-
Culture1 week agoDo You Know the Comics That Inspired These TV Adventures?
-
Education1 week agoVideo: Trader Joe’s Dip Head-to-Head Taste Test
-
Minneapolis, MN6 days agoBoy who shielded classmate during school shooting receives Medal of Honor
-
Tennessee1 week agoTennessee Police Investigating Alleged Assault Involving ‘Reacher’ Star Alan Ritchson
-
Vermont4 days ago
Skier dies after fall at Sugarbush Resort
-
Culture1 week agoWil Wheaton Discusses ‘Stand By Me’ and Narrating ‘The Body’ Audiobook