Connect with us

Lifestyle

On social media, Johnny Depp is winning public sympathy over Amber Heard

Published

on

On social media, Johnny Depp is winning public sympathy over Amber Heard

Actor Johnny Depp waves to the gallery as he leaves for a break Monday throughout his defamation trial in Fairfax, Va. towards his ex-wife, Amber Heard.

Steve Helber/Pool/AFP by way of Getty Pictures


cover caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Steve Helber/Pool/AFP by way of Getty Pictures


Actor Johnny Depp waves to the gallery as he leaves for a break Monday throughout his defamation trial in Fairfax, Va. towards his ex-wife, Amber Heard.

Steve Helber/Pool/AFP by way of Getty Pictures

On Monday, actor Johnny Depp is scheduled to return to the stand within the defamation trial between him and his former spouse, Amber Heard, that’s happening in Fairfax County, Va. Depp sued Heard over an op-ed she wrote in The Washington Submit in 2018 about being a survivor of home violence. Heard didn’t identify Depp within the Submit essay, however Depp says his skilled repute was harm nonetheless. Closing arguments within the case are anticipated to start this Friday.

Advertisement

On Weekend Version Sunday, sociologist Nicole Bedera, who focuses on sexual violence, spoke to NPR concerning the trial and its implications for discussions about intimate companion violence — and why social media appears to have way more sympathy for the previous Pirates of the Caribbean star than for his ex-wife.

Public opinion seems to be weighing way more closely in favor of Depp than Heard. On TikTok, as of Monday morning, #IStandWithAmberHeard has garnered about 8.2 million views, whereas #JusticeForJohnnyDepp has earned about 15 billion views. Why is there such a disparity?

“I believe there are a number of causes for that,” Bedera stated. “Certainly one of them that is actually easy, and that we can’t overlook is, in a defamation case, Johnny Depp will get to go first. And so his facet of the story has been instructed in full. And lots of people made up their minds after week one of many case or day three of the case. However the different purpose is that in on-line areas, we frequently see that males’s rights teams and different anti-feminist teams are higher organized. We all know that males’s rights activist boards, for instance, have been following the Heard case fairly rigorously.”

Might it’s doable additionally that the general public is likely to be extra sympathetic towards Depp as a result of he’s such an enormous film star, and so well-liked on display screen for many years?

Sure, Bedera responded. “That is one thing I say lots,” she continued. “All of us assume that sexual violence is unsuitable and say that we are going to consider and assist survivors, up till the perpetrator is somebody we all know and like. You do not wish to really feel such as you’re a foul individual when you proceed to love Pirates Of The Caribbean.”

Advertisement

Throughout the trial, Depp has additionally accused Heard of assaulting him, and claimed that he’s a sufferer of home violence as properly. It has been one thing of a catalyst for males’s rights teams to rally round Depp.

“In our society,” Bedera stated, “we anticipate that victims match a selected mildew. We name it the proper sufferer trope. And infrequently we confuse victims’ self-defense as a type of aggression. And that is actually widespread in instances like this, the place perpetrators will declare that they’re the true victims. They do one thing that psychologists name ‘DARVO.’ ‘DARVO’ is an acronym that stands for deny, assault and reverse sufferer and offender. And we’re seeing it on show actually clearly on this case, the place Johnny Depp is denying — not that he was violent, he really remains to be admitting that there was violence coming from him on this relationship. However he is denying that Amber Heard’s story of it’s reliable, and as an alternative saying that she drove him to violence.” (In a sequence of 2016 texts, Depp and fellow actor Paul Bettany mentioned the concept of killing Heard, which he stated on the stand was “summary humor.” He additionally claimed on the stand that it was Heard who turned their fights bodily.)

Bedera additionally says that she is anxious concerning the affect this trial might have on victims of intimate companion violence and their willingness to come back ahead.

“That is my greatest concern about this case, and I believe it is one thing that is actually gotten misplaced within the sensationalism across the trial,” she added. “Proper now, [Depp’s] workforce is alleging that if a girl comes ahead and identifies as a survivor in public, that that would rely as defamation.”

That might pose dangers to accusers who will not be as high-profile as Depp and Heard.

Advertisement

“Completely, it is already taking place,” stated Bedera. “In line with a Know Your IX report from 2021, they discovered that of the survivors that report back to their universities, 23% are threatened with defamation lawsuits by their perpetrators, and 10% face some form of a retaliatory criticism on campus.”

Depp’s repute in Hollywood has already taken successful. Final Thursday, Depp’s former agent testified that studios have been much less keen to work with him due to his “unprofessional habits” and rumored substance abuse.

“One query I’ve proper now, in our kind of post-#MeToo second,” Bedera commented, “we’re making an attempt to resolve what the implications needs to be for intimate companion violence. And the truth is that Johnny Depp is dealing with a number of penalties for committing acts of violence, not simply to Amber Heard but in addition for unstable habits on set. And individuals who work alongside him have a bit clearer of an image than any person who’s watching it on TikTok and does not know any of the individuals concerned on this case. Each Johnny Depp and Amber Heard admit that there was violence on this relationship. The query is whether or not or not there needs to be penalties for that violence. And that is the combat we’re having in public proper now.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Lifestyle

Critics hated 'The Phantom Menace.' It might be time to reconsider : Consider This from NPR

Published

on

Critics hated 'The Phantom Menace.' It might be time to reconsider : Consider This from NPR

A Jedi and a Jar Jar walk into a movie…

Maximum Film/Alamy


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Maximum Film/Alamy


A Jedi and a Jar Jar walk into a movie…

Maximum Film/Alamy

The year is 1999. Fans are lined up around theaters. News stations are treating it like a breaking news event.

On May 19, Star Wars: Episode I — The Phantom Menace hit theaters, the first movie of the franchise to be released in well over a decade. It promised to tell the origin story of how Anakin Skywalker became Darth Vader.

Advertisement

Fans were so excited some camped out for days, sometimes even weeks, to see the film on opening day.

“The original trilogy was so phenomenal,” said one eager moviegoer. “People have been waiting for this for, like, 16 years.” Another went so far as to say, “There are now eight wonders of the world, one of them being this movie.”

When one reporter asked a crowd if there was any concern the movie might be bad, they responded with a resounding “No.” Oh how wrong they were.

You’re reading the Consider This newsletter, which unpacks one major news story each day. Subscribe here to get it delivered to your inbox, and listen to more from the Consider This podcast.

The consensus? It was a huge flop

NPR sent two critics to review the film. Neither had much good to say.

Advertisement

Here’s how Tom Shales described the movie: “The new Star Wars movie Episode 1 — The Phantom Menace is a menace. It’s not about storytelling and it’s not about people … it’s about effects and technology. It’s a computer movie through and through, by computers and maybe for computers.”

NPR’s Bob Mondello took issue with the infamous Jar Jar Binks: “‘What could he have been thinking,’ you say to yourself as [George Lucas] introduces a race of idol-worshiping primitives who speak with Caribbean accents and behave like refugees from Amos n Andy.”

The trailer for Star Wars: Episode I — The Phantom Menace

Advertisement

YouTube

The backlash didn’t stop there. People hated nine-year-old Darth Vader. They didn’t like all the talk of taxes and trade embargoes.

Hating on The Phantom Menace has become somewhat of a punchline in Star Wars circles, says Erich Schwartzel, who covers the film industry for The Wall Street Journal and is writing a book about George Lucas and Star Wars.

He told NPR the hype only amplified the sting of disappointment: “It’s really, looking back I think, the first example that I have, and maybe the film industry has, of the movie almost being beside the point.”

25 years later, nostalgia has given the film new life

While the overwhelming consensus was The Phantom Menace was terrible, only a Sith deals in absolutes (sorry).

To understand how popular opinion on the film has changed, Schwartzel points to Jar Jar Binks. Schwartzel said most of the fans who grew up on the original Star Wars trilogy would have been in their late 20s or early 30s when they lined up to watch The Phantom Menace.

Advertisement

“[Jar Jar] represents the inherently childish nature of Star Wars, and how childish it can be,” Schwartzel said. “I think Jar Jar is a bit of an affront to those fans, sort of being a reminder that this is also for kids.”

Fans line up at the Ziegfeld Theatre in New York on May 6, 1999 to be the first to see the movie, Star Wars: Episode 1 — The Phantom Menace.

Stan Honda/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Stan Honda/AFP via Getty Images


Fans line up at the Ziegfeld Theatre in New York on May 6, 1999 to be the first to see the movie, Star Wars: Episode 1 — The Phantom Menace.

Stan Honda/AFP via Getty Images

Now that those kids, whose introduction to the Star Wars world was The Phantom Menace, are adults, it’s unsurprising the film is remembered more fondly. The “prequel kids,” as Schwartzel puts it, hold The Phantom Menace as dear to them as older fans revere A New Hope.

After a recent anniversary screening of the film in D.C., All Things Considered host Scott Detrow met 29-year-old Eleni Salyers, who said she’s been a fan of the prequels since she was a kid: “For me it’s nostalgic. Growing up I always preferred the prequels, which is a hot take for many Star Wars fans.”

Advertisement

To fans like Salyers, some of the best moments include the lightsaber fights, which compared to those in the original trilogy, are faster and flashier. The Phantom Menace also introduced fans to podracing, with its now iconic visual and sound effects.

The prequel trilogy has played a foundational role in building the Star Wars franchise into a “multigenerational juggernaut,” Schwartzel said. He notes that if you look at the fire hose of Star Wars content Disney has released over the last decade, you’ll see much of the themes and characters come from the world the prequels created.

This episode was produced by Marc Rivers. It was edited by Jeanette Woods. Our executive producer is Sami Yenigun.

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

L.A. Affairs: I found love in a truly hopeless place. Yes, the office

Published

on

L.A. Affairs: I found love in a truly hopeless place. Yes, the office

Heartbroken after a breakup that was long overdue, crushed by a stalled entertainment industry and depressed by my temporary day job at a dementia center, I grasped at any semblance of stability. Desperation led me to apply for an office job at a law firm in Westwood despite having zero legal experience and a unique disdain for cubicles and fluorescent lighting.

Months of hopeful waiting ended with a curt dismissal: “We’ve decided to move forward with another candidate.”

I was bitter, and my mind was overflowing with imagined shortcomings directed at the other candidate. The guy they chose was probably fluent in legal jargon and adept at being mundane as hell. He probably penciled in his laughter. He probably was awful, I thought.

Two months later, I received a phone call. The firm was expanding and wanted to hire me. I knew I would have to work with the person who got the job I had applied for, but I needed the income, so I dusted off my loafers and put my ego aside.

Advertisement

I wasn’t going to be there for the long-term and I certainly wasn’t going to make friends, I decided. Naturally the universe had other plans for my time in the office. My aloof facade crumbled upon meeting Chris.

When we were introduced, I politely asked him how he was doing, and he proudly belted out, “L-I-V-I-N!”

It was obvious why Chris was selected for the job that I had wanted. He didn’t know about statutes or precedents. He wasn’t stuffy or boring, and his laughter was far from regulated. Everyone loved him. And why wouldn’t they? I’d never met anyone like him.

His smile was like a floodlight. He repelled negative energy, and anxiety feared him. In an office that made the DMV look like Disneyland, he was everything.

Chris was training me, and we were the only people in our department. I started wearing mascara, removing my headphones and asking Chris questions I already knew the answer to. He would leave notes on my car. We exchanged screenplays, and he would text me after work, referencing inside jokes that we pretended were funnier than they were.

Advertisement

But I’ll admit that I was stubborn. I couldn’t let myself enjoy anything about this job or this phase in my life. I needed to focus on my writing. The strike would end, the clouds would lift, and this blip in time would be forgotten. I couldn’t admit that I was in love with Chris. It wasn’t part of my plan.

We would go to Barney’s Beanery together on our lunch breaks but pretend that we weren’t going on dates. We would take our 15-minute breaks together to “get fresh air.” We made a combined Spotify Blend playlist, revealing our mutual love of Green Day and the Smashing Pumpkins. Sometimes I even forgot how much I hated going to the office.

Chris had an AMC Movie Pass, and I was a good liar. He would see movies after work to beat traffic, so I bought the pass and acted like I’d always had it.

The day we planned to see a movie after work, Chris received terrible news of a death in his family. I offered my condolences at the office. I wanted to hold him but didn’t know if I could so much as pat his arm. I asked if he’d still like to see the movie, and he insisted he needed the distraction.

It was Christmas for all of December in Century City. As we drank three limoncellos each, Chris told me stories about his uncle who made Southern California feel like home, and we shared our first hug. He smelled like clean laundry, and I was drunk enough to tell him.

Advertisement

We sneaked more drinks into the theater and watched Paul Giamatti in “The Holdovers,” which made me cry. Chris held my hand. We stumbled into another movie — a private screening of a live production of “Titanic the Musical.” We didn’t want our night to end, so we went to Barney’s for a nightcap. Standing outside of our favorite bar, we shared our first kiss. It felt overdue.

Since then, we’ve met each other’s families and friends, taken road trips together and seen many more movies. (For me, the AMC Pass was a great investment.)

We also finished all of our work assignments at the law firm. Three weeks ago, the firm let Chris go. I wondered if I should quit. I wanted to. Chris was the best thing about that office, and I couldn’t bear the thought of being there without him. Thirty minutes after Chris was let go, I was let go. We were so happy to be free. The next day we went to Universal Studios to celebrate.

The maze of dead-end interviews, the drudgery of temporary gigs and the tumultuous nature of making a living as a writer don’t feel so bad anymore. We have new day jobs but still go to Barney’s Beanery. We also work on our screenplays and write bad jokes.

Occasionally I make arbitrary plans and ridiculous statements about how things ought to pan out. And I find myself laughing. Not a penciled-in laugh. An unchecked laugh. A Chris-inspired free laugh. I don’t know what the future holds for us, but for now, Chris and I are falling deeper in love and “L-I-V-I-N.”

Advertisement

The author is a screenwriter living in West Hollywood. She’s on Instagram: @mlindz

L.A. Affairs chronicles the search for romantic love in all its glorious expressions in the L.A. area, and we want to hear your true story. We pay $400 for a published essay. Email LAAffairs@latimes.com. You can find submission guidelines here. You can find past columns here.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Brian Wilson of The Beach Boys is being placed under a legal conservatorship

Published

on

Brian Wilson of The Beach Boys is being placed under a legal conservatorship

Brian Wilson, performing in Los Angeles in 2015.

Kevin Winter/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Kevin Winter/Getty Images


Brian Wilson, performing in Los Angeles in 2015.

Kevin Winter/Getty Images

Brian Wilson, one of the founders of The Beach Boys and the writer of many of their hits, will be placed under a legal conservatorship due to a “major neurocognitive disorder,” a judge in Los Angeles ruled Thursday. Wilson’s conservators will be two longtime associates: his manager, LeeAnn Hard, and his publicist, Jean Sievers. Wilson’s family pursued the conservatorship after the death of his wife, Melinda, in January.

Wilson’s situation appears to be markedly different than that of another high-profile celebrity conservatorship: that of Britney Spears, which was in place for 13 years before being lifted in 2021.

Advertisement

In his order, Judge Gus T. May of Los Angeles Superior Court noted that Wilson, now 81 years old, agrees to the conservatorship, and that the court has found “from clear and convincing evidence that a Conservatorship of the Person is necessary.”

May observed in his ruling that Wilson lacks the capacity to make his own healthcare decisions, because “the Conservatee has a Major Neurocognitive Disorder and lacks capacity to give informed medical consent for medications.” Judge May stipulated that Wilson’s seven children will be consulted by the conservators regarding major healthcare decisions and kept informed on their father’s condition.

Wilson’s family publicly announced its intention to file for a conservatorship in February, writing on social media:

“Following the passing of Brian’s beloved wife Melinda, after careful consideration and consultation among Brian, his seven children, [longtime family housekeeper] Gloria Ramos and Brian’s doctors (and consistent with family processes put in place by Brian and Melinda), we are confirming that longtime Wilson family representatives LeeAnn Hard and Jean Sievers will serve as Brian’s co-conservators of the person.

This decision was made to ensure that there will be no extreme changes to the household and Brian and the children living at home will be taken care of and remain in the home where they are cared for by Gloria Ramos and the wonderful team at the house who have been in place for many years helping take care of the family.

Brian will be able to enjoy all of his family and friends and continue to work on current projects as well as participate in any activities he chooses.

Advertisement

Although the exact nature of Wilson’s illness has not been disclosed publicly, the family’s court filing in February seeking the conservatorship also noted that Wilson suffers from “a major neurocognitive disorder.”

Wilson has experienced mental health issues throughout much of his life. He continued to record music and tour until 2022, which he credited to his late wife.

In the mid-1970s and again in the early 1980s, he became deeply entwined with psychologist Eugene Landy, who wound up exerting near-total control over Wilson’s life; as Wilson told NPR’s Weekend Edition in 2016: “He wouldn’t let me talk to my family on the phone for nine years … He had power over me.”

In the early 1990s, members of Wilson’s family filed other conservatorship petitions in bids to separate him from Landy; a 1992 restraining order forbid Landy from having any contact with Wilson.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending