Health
Opposites may not attract after all: Recent study reveals the fascinating similarities between most couples
The well-known saying that “opposites attract” may not always be accurate, according to a recent report from the University of Colorado Boulder.
A group of researchers reviewed previous studies and their own original data analysis of more than 130 traits spanning millions of couples, as far back as the year 1903.
They found that partners were more likely to be similar, sharing between 82% to 89% of the traits analyzed, according to a news release from the university.
COLLEGE STUDENT BLAMES PARENTS FOR HIS SHORT STATURE AND HIS ‘INABILITY TO DATE’: ‘MY MOM STARTED CRYING’
The group also found that individuals were likely to partner with those who were different from them for only 3% of the analyzed traits.
The study was published last month in the journal Nature Human Behavior.
“Our findings demonstrate that birds of a feather are indeed more likely to flock together,” first author Tanya Horwitz, a doctoral candidate in the Department of Psychology and Neuroscience and the Institute for Behavioral Genetics, said in the release.
Political and religious attitudes, level of education and substance use were traits that showed the highest correlations, the study found.
“There may be mechanisms happening behind the scenes of which we aren’t fully aware.”
Birth year was the most shared trait.
NEW YORK WOMAN WALKS DOWN THE STREET WITH A ‘LOOKING-FOR-A-HUSBAND’ SIGN — SPARKING PLENTY OF CONVERSATION
“These findings suggest that even in situations where we feel like we have a choice about our relationships, there may be mechanisms happening behind the scenes of which we aren’t fully aware,” Horwitz said in the release.
Heavy drinkers, smokers and nondrinkers had a strong tendency to partner up with those who had similar substance use habits.
Other parallels were seen for weight and height, personality traits and medical conditions.
Even the number of sex partners a person had and whether the individuals were breast-fed as infants showed some correlation, according to the report.
Extroverts, however, did not follow a typical pattern when it came to choosing a partner who was either an introvert or an extrovert.
“Our findings demonstrate that birds of a feather are indeed more likely to flock together.”
“People have all these theories that extroverts like introverts or extroverts like other extroverts, but the fact of the matter is that it’s about like flipping a coin — extroverts are similarly likely to end up with extroverts as with introverts,” Horwitz said in the news release.
Further research is needed to explore correlations that could have an impact on the genetics of future generations, the researchers stated.
HUSBAND WANTS TO CHEAT ON AGREEMENT WITH WIFE ABOUT SLEEPING IN ON WEEKENDS: ‘I WASN’T NICE TO HIM’
If tall people are more likely to couple up with tall people and short people are more likely to partner up with short people and both groups have children, there could be more people at both height extremes in the next generation, Horwitz said in the release.
The same goes for other characteristics, including medical and psychiatric traits.
There are also potential social implications, the researchers noted. If individuals are likely to partner up with those of similar educational backgrounds, this could eventually widen the socioeconomic divide.
“We’re hoping people can use this data to do their own analyses and learn more about how and why people end up in the relationships they do,” Horwitz said.
These correlations may occur for several reasons, the authors said. Some grew up in the same area, were attracted to those similar to them, or became more similar over time, according to the report.
The study did not look at same-sex relationships because the patterns may differ significantly, the release noted.
The researchers are now exploring those separately.
MARRIED COUPLE FIGHTS AFTER 75-POUND DOG REFUSES TO LEAVE THE HUSBAND’S SIDE — EVEN IN BED
Some psychologists and relationship experts, who were not involved with the study, weighed in on the study’s findings in comments to Fox News Digital.
Dr. Jayme Albin, PhD, a cognitive behavioral psychologist in New York City who also counsels those dealing with relationship issues, said she was not surprised to see couples highly correlated for personality traits such as political and religious attitudes, level of education, certain measures of IQ, and attitudes about sex and substance use.
“These are important factors in how people lead their lives and the decisions they make when it comes to spending money and raising children, which are two topics that could heavily interfere with a marriage,” she said.
“I think many couples when dating should pay closer attention to these traits — possibly more so than other elements, such as physical attraction or hobbies,” added Albin.
‘SLEEP DIVORCE’: WHY ARE SOME COUPLES SPENDING THEIR NIGHTS IN SEPARATE BEDS?
Dr. Christine MacInnis, a licensed family therapist in Torrance, California, told Fox News Digital that the “opposites attract” notion may not prove to be a foundation for a longstanding relationship.
“Most romantic relationships are built on shared experiences and commonalities that foster connection,” she said. “Opposites may attract, but the connection will wane without being able to see something of ourselves in the other person.”
Dr. Nancy Frye, PhD, a professor in psychology and chair of the department of behavioral sciences at Long Island University in Brookville, New York, noted that many studies have found that couples who are more similar tend to be happier.
“People tend to form relationships with people they interact with, who live in their neighborhood and frequent the stores and restaurants that they do,” she told Fox News Digital.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER
“Part of this is connected to how people change over time. As a relationship progresses, people may expand their hobbies and interests to include those of their partner.”
The social psychology expert also discussed why many people believe the saying that opposites attract.
“This perception is often due to the fact that people take on complementary roles in a relationship,” she said. “One partner may be the one to organize the finances, while the other partner may be the one to dream up things to spend money on.”
She added, “But if a pool of people are compared to strangers and the people with whom they’re in a relationship, they are much more similar to their relationship partners than to the strangers.”
Health
Treating Other Diseases With Ozempic? Experts Weigh In | Woman's World
Sign Up
Create a free account to access exclusive content, play games, solve puzzles, test your pop-culture knowledge and receive special offers.
Already have an account? Login
Use left and right arrow keys to navigate between menu items.
Use escape to exit the menu.
Health
FDA bans red food dye due to potential cancer risk
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has officially banned red dye — called Red 3, or Erythrosine — from foods, dietary supplements and ingested medicines, as reported by the Associated Press on Wednesday.
Food manufacturers must remove the dye from their products by January 2027, while drug manufacturers will have until January 2028 to do so, AP stated.
Any foods imported into the U.S. from other countries will also be subject to the new regulation.
RED FOOD DYE COULD SOON BE BANNED AS FDA REVIEWS PETITION
“The FDA is taking action that will remove the authorization for the use of FD&C Red No. 3 in food and ingested drugs,” said Jim Jones, the FDA’s deputy commissioner for human foods, in a statement.
“Evidence shows cancer in laboratory male rats exposed to high levels of FD&C Red No.3,” he continued. “Importantly, the way that FD&C Red No. 3 causes cancer in male rats does not occur in humans.”
The synthetic dye, which is made from petroleum, is used as a color additive in food and ingested drugs to give them a “bright cherry-red color,” according to an online statement from the FDA.
The petition to ban the dye cited the Delaney Clause, which states that the agency cannot classify a color additive as safe if it has been found to induce cancer in humans or animals.
The dye was removed from cosmetics nearly 35 years ago due to potential cancer risk.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER
“This is a welcome, but long overdue, action from the FDA: removing the unsustainable double standard in which Red 3 was banned from lipstick but permitted in candy,” said Dr. Peter Lurie, director of the group Center for Science in the Public Interest, which led the petition effort, as reported by AP.
Dr. Marc Siegel, clinical professor of medicine at NYU Langone Health and Fox News senior medical analyst, applauded the FDA’s ban.
“It was a long time coming,” he told Fox News Digital. “It’s been more than 30 years since it was banned from cosmetics in the U.S. due to evidence that it is carcinogenic in high doses in lab rats. There needs to be a consistency between what we put on our skin and what we put into our mouths.”
“There needs to be a consistency between what we put on our skin and what we put into our mouths.”
Siegel said he believes the FDA’s decision could be tied to the incoming new head of the Department of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
“They knew it would have happened anyway under RFK Jr.,” he said. “It is already banned or severely restricted in Australia, Japan and the European Union.”
The food additive also “drew kids in” to a diet of empty calories and ultraprocessed foods, Siegel added.
“It has also been linked to behavioral issues in children, including ADHD.”
Nearly 3,000 foods are shown to contain Red No. 3, according to Food Scores, a database of foods compiled by the Environmental Working Group.
For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health
The National Confectioners Association provided the below statement to Fox News Digital.
“Food safety is the number one priority for U.S. confectionery companies, and we will continue to follow and comply with FDA’s guidance and safety standards.”
The petition to remove Red No. 3 from foods, supplements and medications was presented in 2022 by the Center for Science in the Public Interest and 23 other organizations and scientists.
Health
How Yvette Nicole Brown Lost Weight and Got Her Diabetes Under Control
Sign Up
Create a free account to access exclusive content, play games, solve puzzles, test your pop-culture knowledge and receive special offers.
Already have an account? Login
Use left and right arrow keys to navigate between menu items.
Use escape to exit the menu.
-
Technology1 week ago
Meta is highlighting a splintering global approach to online speech
-
Science6 days ago
Metro will offer free rides in L.A. through Sunday due to fires
-
Technology1 week ago
Las Vegas police release ChatGPT logs from the suspect in the Cybertruck explosion
-
News1 week ago
Photos: Pacific Palisades Wildfire Engulfs Homes in an L.A. Neighborhood
-
Education1 week ago
Four Fraternity Members Charged After a Pledge Is Set on Fire
-
Technology6 days ago
Amazon Prime will shut down its clothing try-on program
-
News1 week ago
Mapping the Damage From the Palisades Fire
-
News1 week ago
Mourners Defy Subfreezing Temperatures to Honor Jimmy Carter at the Capitol