Health
Dust at day care centers contained bacteria that could cause lung issues in kids, study found
Bacteria-containing dust found at day care centers could put children at a higher risk of asthma, a new study from the European Respiratory Society suggests.
In the study, the researchers collected dust samples from 103 different day care facilities in Paris, France.
Then they analyzed the samples in a lab to identify the bacteria found in each one.
The researchers also asked the parents of 515 children to disclose whether the children experienced any wheezing or other respiratory issues.
ASTHMA AND ECZEMA COULD INCREASE RISK OF OSTEOARTHRITIS, STUDY FINDS
Of the four types of bacteria found, one of them — which included Streptococcus and Lactococcus — was linked to a higher risk of wheezing.
That’s often a precursor to asthma in children under 3 years old, the journal entry noted.
The average age of the children in the tested day care centers was 2 years old.
The findings were presented at the European Respiratory Society International Congress in Milan, Italy, by Dr. Annabelle Bédard, a researcher at Inserm (the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research) in Paris, France.
STUFFY NOSE? COMMON OTC NASAL DECONGESTANTS WITH PHENYLEPHRINE DON’T WORK IN TABLET FORM, EXPERTS SAY
“We find mixtures of different bacteria and other microbes living everywhere — outside, inside our homes, on our skin and even inside our bodies,” Bédard said in her presentation. “These communities of bacteria, known as microbiota, can have beneficial or harmful effects on our health.”
She added, “Young children will come into contact with the bacteria living in day care centers via their skin and mouths and by breathing them in. So, we might expect this exposure to have an impact on children’s developing lungs via the different microbiota that arise in children’s airway, gut or skin.”
These findings highlight the need to further investigate indoor air quality at day care centers, Bédard said.
“We now need to understand what factors influence this bacterial community — for example, how the rooms are cleaned and ventilated, and indoor air quality,” she said.
“This, along with future findings from other studies, could help us understand how to improve conditions and inform public health strategies for preventing chronic respiratory diseases, such as asthma, in children.”
COVID-19, FLU AND RSV VACCINES ARE ALL AVAILABLE THIS FALL: SEE WHAT SOME DOCTORS RECOMMEND AND WHY
The researchers plan to follow the health of the children in the study to determine which develop asthma as they grow older.
Dr. Steven Abelowitz, founder and medical director of Coastal Kids Pediatrics in California and also medical director of Pediatric Associates, was not involved in the study but reviewed the findings.
He noted that some of the bacteria found in the study are quite common, while others are less common.
“We still have a great deal to learn about these complex bacteria types and how our bodies respond to them.”
“Per the study, at least two of the types of bacteria (Streptococcus and Lactococcus) — which were the second most common bacteria they found — showed an association of a higher risk of wheezing in the study,” Abelowitz told Fox News Digital.
“We still have a great deal to learn about these complex bacteria types and how our bodies respond to them.”
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER
While wheezing can be a sign or symptom of asthma, the doctor noted that’s not always the case.
“It really depends on how frequent and severe the wheezing is, as well as if there is a family history of allergies, asthma and eczema,” he said. “Some studies have even shown that day care attendance in early childhood has been observed to be inversely associated with wheezing and asthma.”
To minimize the risk of wheezing and other lung issues in kids who are attending day care facilities, Abelowitz recommended that all rooms be kept clean and well-ventilated, and that indoor air quality is consistently monitored.
Abelowitz reiterated the need for more studies to explore these “complex communities of bacteria” and their potential association with long-term lung issues for children.
He added, “From a pediatrician’s standpoint, it’s more important to choose childcare programs with low child-to-teacher ratios, small group sizes, well-trained staff, age-appropriate curriculum and a safe, positive environment.”
For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews/health
Health
Treating Other Diseases With Ozempic? Experts Weigh In | Woman's World
Sign Up
Create a free account to access exclusive content, play games, solve puzzles, test your pop-culture knowledge and receive special offers.
Already have an account? Login
Use left and right arrow keys to navigate between menu items.
Use escape to exit the menu.
Health
FDA bans red food dye due to potential cancer risk
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has officially banned red dye — called Red 3, or Erythrosine — from foods, dietary supplements and ingested medicines, as reported by the Associated Press on Wednesday.
Food manufacturers must remove the dye from their products by January 2027, while drug manufacturers will have until January 2028 to do so, AP stated.
Any foods imported into the U.S. from other countries will also be subject to the new regulation.
RED FOOD DYE COULD SOON BE BANNED AS FDA REVIEWS PETITION
“The FDA is taking action that will remove the authorization for the use of FD&C Red No. 3 in food and ingested drugs,” said Jim Jones, the FDA’s deputy commissioner for human foods, in a statement.
“Evidence shows cancer in laboratory male rats exposed to high levels of FD&C Red No.3,” he continued. “Importantly, the way that FD&C Red No. 3 causes cancer in male rats does not occur in humans.”
The synthetic dye, which is made from petroleum, is used as a color additive in food and ingested drugs to give them a “bright cherry-red color,” according to an online statement from the FDA.
The petition to ban the dye cited the Delaney Clause, which states that the agency cannot classify a color additive as safe if it has been found to induce cancer in humans or animals.
The dye was removed from cosmetics nearly 35 years ago due to potential cancer risk.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER
“This is a welcome, but long overdue, action from the FDA: removing the unsustainable double standard in which Red 3 was banned from lipstick but permitted in candy,” said Dr. Peter Lurie, director of the group Center for Science in the Public Interest, which led the petition effort, as reported by AP.
Dr. Marc Siegel, clinical professor of medicine at NYU Langone Health and Fox News senior medical analyst, applauded the FDA’s ban.
“It was a long time coming,” he told Fox News Digital. “It’s been more than 30 years since it was banned from cosmetics in the U.S. due to evidence that it is carcinogenic in high doses in lab rats. There needs to be a consistency between what we put on our skin and what we put into our mouths.”
“There needs to be a consistency between what we put on our skin and what we put into our mouths.”
Siegel said he believes the FDA’s decision could be tied to the incoming new head of the Department of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
“They knew it would have happened anyway under RFK Jr.,” he said. “It is already banned or severely restricted in Australia, Japan and the European Union.”
The food additive also “drew kids in” to a diet of empty calories and ultraprocessed foods, Siegel added.
“It has also been linked to behavioral issues in children, including ADHD.”
Nearly 3,000 foods are shown to contain Red No. 3, according to Food Scores, a database of foods compiled by the Environmental Working Group.
For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health
The National Confectioners Association provided the below statement to Fox News Digital.
“Food safety is the number one priority for U.S. confectionery companies, and we will continue to follow and comply with FDA’s guidance and safety standards.”
The petition to remove Red No. 3 from foods, supplements and medications was presented in 2022 by the Center for Science in the Public Interest and 23 other organizations and scientists.
Health
How Yvette Nicole Brown Lost Weight and Got Her Diabetes Under Control
Sign Up
Create a free account to access exclusive content, play games, solve puzzles, test your pop-culture knowledge and receive special offers.
Already have an account? Login
Use left and right arrow keys to navigate between menu items.
Use escape to exit the menu.
-
Technology1 week ago
Meta is highlighting a splintering global approach to online speech
-
Science6 days ago
Metro will offer free rides in L.A. through Sunday due to fires
-
Technology1 week ago
Las Vegas police release ChatGPT logs from the suspect in the Cybertruck explosion
-
News1 week ago
Photos: Pacific Palisades Wildfire Engulfs Homes in an L.A. Neighborhood
-
Education1 week ago
Four Fraternity Members Charged After a Pledge Is Set on Fire
-
Politics1 week ago
Trump trolls Canada again, shares map with country as part of US: 'Oh Canada!'
-
Technology6 days ago
Amazon Prime will shut down its clothing try-on program
-
News1 week ago
Mapping the Damage From the Palisades Fire