Connect with us

Finance

Social Security: Readers weigh in with questions

Published

on

Social Security: Readers weigh in with questions
Americans understand when they can start receiving Social Security benefits but are less sure of their own benefit levels, according to a new <a data-i13n="cpos:1;pos:1" href="https://www.nirsonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/FINAL-Views-on-SS-July-2024.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" data-ylk="slk:research brief;cpos:1;pos:1;elm:context_link;itc:0;sec:content-canvas" class="link "></div></div></div><div class=

However, if someone is younger than full retirement age and still working while receiving Social Security benefits, it could push them above the yearly earnings limit and their monthly benefits would be temporarily reduced. This is not permanent.

Here’s how the Social Security Administration runs the math: If you are receiving a Social Security benefit and are under full retirement age for the entire year, $1 is deducted from your benefit payments for every $2 you earn above the annual earnings limit. For 2024, that limit is $22,320.

In the year you reach full retirement age, $1 in benefits is deducted from your monthly benefit for every $3 you earn, but only earnings before the month you reach your full retirement age are counted. If you reach full retirement age in 2024, the limit on your earnings for the months before your birthday is $59,520.

What counts as earnings are the wages you make from your job or your net earnings if you’re self-employed. The calculation also includes bonuses, commissions, and vacation pay. What’s not counted: pensions, annuities, investment income, interest, veterans benefits, or other government or military retirement benefits.

But you will get any deductions back. Once you reach FRA, your monthly benefit will be increased permanently to account for the months in which benefits were withheld.

Advertisement
Close-up portrait of a beautiful senior woman against blue backgroundClose-up portrait of a beautiful senior woman against blue background

Continuing to work for pay past 70 will not increase your Social Security benefit. But keep on working by all means — you can receive benefits even if you still work. (Getty Creative) (Flashpop via Getty Images)

One additional caveat to keep in mind: Premiums for Medicare Part B, which covers doctors’ visits and outpatient services, and Part D, which covers prescription drugs, could increase if you earn significantly more money. If you earn more than $103,000 as an individual or more than $206,000 if you’re a joint filer, you’ll pay an extra amount. Those premiums are typically pulled from your monthly Social Security check.

Dear Kerry, I am 62, working and receiving a spouse’s survival benefits. If I retire and file for Social Security benefits, do I have to choose one or can I get two? Silvia V.

Thanks for this great question, Silvia.

You can only choose one benefit; the larger of the two will typically become your sole benefit.

As a surviving spouse, you can receive 100% of a deceased spouse’s benefit if you had waited until your own FRA, 67, when you claimed the survivors benefit. The benefit amount, however, is reduced for ages less than FRA. The closer you are to your FRA, the greater the benefit.

Advertisement

The upside for you, though, is that it’s possible to claim a widow’s benefit, as you have, while letting your own retirement benefit grow. For example, you may claim a widow’s benefit at 60, and then shift to your own retirement benefit at age 70, if it’s a larger amount.

Meantime, while this doesn’t apply in your case, it’s important to mention for other surviving spouses that if you and your late spouse were both claiming Social Security benefits at the time of their death, then the larger of the two benefits becomes your survivors benefit.

Then too, for a surviving spouse, if you applied for your own Social Security benefit less than 12 months prior to the death of your spouse, you have the option to withdraw this application and apply for survivors benefits if it is a larger amount.

Bottom line: A surviving spouse, surviving divorced spouse, unmarried child, or dependent parent may be eligible for monthly survivor benefits based on the deceased worker’s earnings. There are myriad variables to consider, so I advise reaching out to Social Security directly.

Have a question about about retirement? Personal finances? Anything career-related? Drop Kerry Hannon a note.

Advertisement

Is it possible to will my Social Security balance to my children? — Edwin S

No. Once you start Social Security retirement benefits, you’re generally guaranteed to receive monthly checks for the rest of your life. But, Edwin, that comes to a hard stop when you die.

Lovely little girl raising her arms, looking up to the sky joyfully while her dad carrying her on shoulders in promenade.Lovely little girl raising her arms, looking up to the sky joyfully while her dad carrying her on shoulders in promenade.

When a parent, for example, receives Social Security retirement or disability benefits, and dies, their child may also receive benefits. (Getty Creative) (Images By Tang Ming Tung via Getty Images)

There are exceptions for family members who may be eligible to receive survivor benefits based on the deceased beneficiary’s earnings record starting as soon as the month they died.

When a parent, for example, receives Social Security retirement or disability benefits and dies, their child may also receive benefits. Under certain circumstances, a stepchild, adopted child, or dependent grandchild or step-grandchild may also qualify.

To receive benefits, the child must be unmarried and younger than age 18, or between ages 18 and 19 and a full-time student at an elementary or secondary school (grade 12 or below), or age 18 or older with a disability that began before age 22.

Advertisement

Thanks to my Yahoo Finance readers who felt comfortable sending along your questions. My advice for all of you trying to make sense of your Social Security benefits: Create a My Social Security account. This is a customized portal that lets you check the status of a benefits application, estimate future benefits, or manage the benefits you already receive. You can set up an account even if you don’t currently receive benefits. Do it.

Kerry Hannon is a Senior Columnist at Yahoo Finance. She is a career and retirement strategist, and the author of 14 books, including “In Control at 50+: How to Succeed in The New World of Work” and “Never Too Old To Get Rich.” Follow her on X @kerryhannon.

Click here for the latest personal finance news to help you with investing, paying off debt, buying a home, retirement, and more

Read the latest financial and business news from Yahoo Finance

Advertisement

Finance

Austin council member Paige Ellis may have violated campaign finance rules again

Published

on

Austin council member Paige Ellis may have violated campaign finance rules again

Austin City Council Member Paige Ellis listens to public testimony on Wednesday, Aug. 16, 2023 at City Hall. The District 8 representative, who is running for re-election this year, has previously faced scrutiny for campaign finance practices.

Mikala Compton/Austin American-Statesman

Austin City Council member Paige Ellis has again accepted campaign contributions that appear to exceed city limits, according to recent campaign finance reports, raising questions about compliance with local election law as she seeks a third term representing Southwest Austin.

Under current city rules, candidates for City Council or mayor may not accept more than $450 per contributor per election. The limit applies to individual donors, with exceptions only for the candidate and small-donor political committees.

Article continues below this ad

Campaign finance reports filed in July 2025 and January 2026 show Ellis accepted nearly $2,500 in contributions that exceeded the $450 individual cap. At least 12 donors gave more than the legal limit, either through single donations above $450 or through multiple contributions across the reporting period that cumulatively exceeded the cap.

Advertisement

In some cases, donors made two or more contributions during the reporting period that, when combined, pushed their total giving beyond the limit. In other instances, donors appeared to list themselves both individually and jointly with a spouse or partner in ways that resulted in total contributions exceeding what is allowed.

Ellis’ campaign manager, Mykle Tomlinson, said he was aware of the $450 cap for individual contributors. Ellis and Tomlinson both said they believed married couples could contribute up to $900 combined, based on each spouse being allowed to give $450.

“As long as the couple hasn’t given over $900, it’s within the limits,” Ellis said. She added that this interpretation applies even when one spouse gives jointly and then later gives individually, calling it a “working definition” that campaigns have followed for years.

Article continues below this ad

Read More: Austin City Council members push to ease spending rules before vote

Advertisement

Ellis said she personally knows the donors and is aware of which contributors are married, even if both spouses’ names are not listed on campaign finance forms.

However, official guidance from both the Texas Ethics Commission and the City of Austin requires contributors to list their full name on campaign finance reports.

“If a finance report listed an amount above $450 with only one name, that would be an issue for the city’s Ethics Review Commission to review,” city spokesperson Jenny LaCoste-Caputo said in a statement Wednesday.

Article continues below this ad

Central Texas-based ethics attorney Andrew Cates called it “common sense” to list contributions under two names from a married couple to clarify that those donations come from both people, adding that the whole reporting system is in place so there is no confusion about where the money is coming from.

Advertisement

“If it’s combined, then say it’s combined,” he said. “It’s not that hard.”

City rules state that the candidate is responsible for filing required reports.

Campaign finance violations are reviewed by the city’s Ethics Review Commission. Ellis’ husband, Edward Espinoza, served on the commission from July 2023 through March 2025. He also previously served as Ellis’ campaign treasurer.

Article continues below this ad

Asked whether Espinoza’s service on the commission posed a conflict of interest, Tomlinson said Ellis recused herself during Espinoza’s appointment by the mayor. He added that the commission often struggled to achieve a quorum during that period and that other council members supported Espinoza’s appointment.

Advertisement

“It doesn’t seem like anyone thought it was a conflict of interest,” Tomlinson said.

Read More: Austin’s proposed tax hike follows behind-the-scenes budget maneuvering

This is not the first time Ellis has faced scrutiny over campaign finance practices. In 2022, the Ethics Review Commission considered a complaint alleging 56 violations related to her campaign, including accepting contributions above city limits and failing to provide required donor employment information.

Article continues below this ad

Commissioners dismissed the allegations related to donor information but found that Ellis had accepted excessive contributions. Ellis acknowledged the violations and was sanctioned with a letter of notification. She later issued refunds for the amounts in question.

Advertisement

In a written statement, Tomlinson said the commission “dismissed the lion’s share of complaints” and found that seven transactions — totaling about $20 — exceeded contribution limits by small amounts. Those funds were refunded and reflected in a subsequent campaign finance report, he said.

Ellis is running for re-election to a third term representing District 8. Because city rules generally limit members to two terms, she will have to collect signatures from at least 5% of eligible voters in her district to appear on the ballot. 

Article continues below this ad

So far, Ellis has drawn one challenger: Selena Xie, a former Austin EMS Association president, EMS commander and ICU nurse, who announced her candidacy in July. 

Voters will decide the District 8 race in the Nov. 3 election. Council districts 1, 3, 5 and 9 will also be on the ballot this November.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Fake ‘ghost students’ stealing identities and financial aid money

Published

on

Fake ‘ghost students’ stealing identities and financial aid money

NEW YORK (WABC) — They’re called “ghost students” and they’re draining the resources of community colleges and stealing tax payer financial aid funds.

“You’re stealing from people who really have the least already,” said Dr. David Stout, President of Brookdale Community College in New Jersey. “It’s infuriating.”

Scammers are stealing people’s identities, often through data breaches, to apply for online college classes. Once they apply for financial aid and get the money, they disappear.

It’s a sophisticated scheme and community colleges are often targeted because of their open enrollment policies.

At Brookdale Community College, they’ve been receiving about 1,000 ghost student applications each year for the past three years.

Advertisement

“Knowing that there are individuals out there that are trying to steal from our community college students and individuals who are trying to steal from our community and from our taxpayers is infuriating,” said Dr. Stout.

Since the pandemic started, it wasn’t rare to have students across the country sign up for his college’s online courses. But three years ago, when one of his financial aid workers noticed a bump in enrollment, the president’s team investigated.

“So she dug a little bit deeper and found that there were seven students that all shared somewhat common credentials and it was at that point that we realized that we were the victims of ghost students,” said Dr. Stout.

“Of course I’m furious that we may have individuals who try to take advantage of the open door policies that community colleges have,” said Dr. Stout.

He said there’s no evidence that any of the fake students who applied at Brookdale received financial funds, they were discovered first. Since then, the college says it has put mechanisms in place to root out fake applicants.

Advertisement

Eyewitness News reached out to other colleges in the area who say they’ve also put new screening practices in place.

At the City University of New York, a spokesperson said ghost applicants make up less than 1% of its applications. In a statement, a college spokesperson said: “Thanks to our careful screening process none were accepted or provided financial aid, but we continue to strengthen our policies to reduce the number of these applications. For example, the University recently introduced CAPTCHA to screen out bots and fake applicants.”

Nassau Community College has also taken precautions.

A spokesperson said. “while we cannot disclose specific security measures, the college’s IT, financial aid, and admissions departments have been working together to protect the integrity of our admissions and financial aid processes and mitigate the risk this type of fraud poses to our institution.”

Eyewitness News partnered with ABC News to show how this is a growing problem across the country.

Advertisement

The Inspector General’s Office with the U.S. Department of Education says they have 200 open investigations nationwide.

“We see in some of these fraud schemes where people are enrolled in two or three different schools at the same time receiving aid at all of them,” said Jason Williams, the U.S. Dept of Education Assistant Inspector General for Investigation.

Some schools are now using special software to screen applicants.

“It takes a tremendous amount of administrative work to go through and verify that they’re fraudulent,” said Dr. Stout.

The Brookdale Community College President says they’re in contact with other colleges in the area on a continuous basis to share information and ways to prevent ghost applicants from getting enrolled.

Advertisement

———-
SHARE YOUR STORY

Do you have an issue with a company that you haven’t been able to resolve? If so, 7 On Your Side wants to help you!

Fill out the form below or email your questions, issues, or story ideas by filling out the form below or by emailing 7OnYourSideNina@abc.com. All emails MUST INCLUDE YOUR NAME AND CELLPHONE NUMBER. Without a phone number, 7 On Your Side will not be able to respond.

You can also contact Dan Krauth directly:

Email your questions, issues, or story ideas to 7OnYourSideDan@abc.com

Advertisement

Facebook: DanKrauthReports

Twitter: @ DanKrauthABC7

Instagram: @DanKrauth

Copyright © 2026 WABC-TV. All Rights Reserved.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Graham Price, Senior Consultant, Financial Restructuring

Published

on

Graham Price, Senior Consultant, Financial Restructuring

Graham is a senior consultant in the global special situations & private credit practice, based in the Hong Kong office. Dually qualified in England & Wales and Hong Kong, Graham focuses on both finance and restructuring matters across the Asia-Pacific region. He represents private credit funds, private equity sponsors, major institutional lenders and asset managers on a wide range of finance transactions, including cross-border leveraged financings, restructurings, special situations, direct lending, margin loans, real estate finance and corporate facilities.

Prior to joining Akin, Graham worked at leading international law firms in Hong Kong and London where he also undertook a secondment to Barclays Capital. 

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending