Connect with us

Finance

The secrets to a successful retirement? Planning, spending, and social connections.

Published

on

The secrets to a successful retirement? Planning, spending, and social connections.

Listen and subscribe to Decoding Retirement on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you find your favorite podcasts.

How might you go about having a happy, successful, and wealthy retirement?

In her new book, “How to Retire,” Christine Benz, the director of personal finance and retirement at Morningstar, interviewed many of the nation’s top retirement experts and distilled their discussions into 20 lessons for doing just that.

In a recent Decoding Retirement podcast, Benz shared some of the top takeaways from those conversations. Lesson one, she said, is to visualize your retirement lifestyle and put habits in place to make it happen.

“The point is that we’re all wired a little bit differently in terms of what we want from our retirement cash flows,” Benz said. “A broader message of this book is there’s more than one way to do this. … You should give a little thought to what you specifically are looking for.”

Advertisement

In one interview, Fritz Gilbert, the author of “The Keys to a Successful Retirement” and the Retirement Manifesto blog, emphasized the importance of taking thoughtful steps before retiring.

For her part, Benz said phasing into retirement, starting around age 50, is a best practice. And you don’t have to take concrete steps; you can just start thinking about which parts of your work you like and dislike.

“Starting early, I think, is such a valuable piece of advice from Fritz,” Benz said.

Advertisement

Consider making decisions about your work life in the years leading up to retirement, either in “stealth mode” or through candid discussions with your employer. Then, take additional steps, such as saving contact information and personal files from your work computer.

You might also consider “dabbling” in retirement activities before fully retiring, Benz said, as this can help ensure you’re “in the driver’s seat” as you move into the next phase of retirement.

Michael Finke, a professor at the American College of Financial Services, pointed out in his interview with Benz that retirement is not all about relaxation, leisure activities, and free time. After all, you need something to relax from.

Advertisement

“The best relaxation comes after you’ve actually accomplished something,” Benz said. “You need to figure out a way to have a sense that you are accomplishing something.”

His actionable advice: Find an “animating force” that provides a sense of purpose in retirement, such as volunteering, continued work in some capacity, or reengaging with family.

“The main point is that even when you step away from work, you need to look at where you will go for some of the balance and structure and purpose and identity that your work provided you with,” Benz said.

Read more: Retirement planning: A step-by-step guide

Advertisement

In her interview with Laura Carstensen, the director of the Stanford Center on Longevity, Benz learned that work is good for us in that it helps us maintain social connections.

“Social connections mean a lot to our life satisfaction,” said Benz.

Given that, you should preemptively think about where you will find day-to-day interactions after leaving work. “Make sure that you are replacing work friendships with friendships outside of work because those work friendships may not stand the test of time,” Benz said.

Two elderly men playing a board game in Aveiro, Portugal. (Photo by: Nano Calvo/VWPics/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)
Two elderly men playing a board game in Aveiro, Portugal. (Nano Calvo/VWPics/Universal Images Group via Getty Images) · VW Pics via Getty Images

Understand that social networks may shrink with age, partly due to loss and partly due to self-selection toward a closer “inner circle.”

“As we age, we tend to want to spend more time with the inner circle, that very tight network of people who totally get us where, when we walk away from being with them, we’re like walking on air because we feel so completely understood,” Benz said.

Benz also noted that men, in particular, should be proactive in maintaining and building social circles outside of work.

Advertisement

Carstensen’s point, Benz said, is that “it’s OK to have your network shrink a little bit as you age,” but “you don’t want that social network to get too small. You don’t want to be down to just, say, two or three people.”

In another interview, David Blanchett, the head of retirement research at PGIM DC Solutions, noted that retiree spending — even among high-income households — tends to trend down over time but then often flares up later due to uninsured long-term care costs.

This is often referred to as “the spending smile,” Benz said.

Given that dynamic, Blanchett “has always been a believer in people giving themselves a little bit of permission to spend more earlier on,” Benz added. But giving yourself permission to spend isn’t always easy.

“The problem is a real one,” Benz said, and it’s rarely addressed, since many retirees haven’t saved enough for retirement.

Advertisement

Read more: Here’s what to do with your retirement savings in a market sell-off

Benz noted that she often meets people who bring up this issue. They’ve seen themselves as savers throughout their working lives, and that identity has become second nature. Now, however, with their portfolios at high levels, the idea of drawing down those savings feels uncomfortable.

And many genuinely struggle with spending — often for good reason. Part of the challenge, Benz speculated, lies in the word “spending” itself, which many associate with excess.

“There is this association of spending with profligacy,” Benz said, when that’s often not the case at all. For instance, some retirees provide meaningful support to adult children or other loved ones, particularly while they’re still young and may need it most.

How one should allocate assets when entering retirement?

Advertisement

William Bernstein, co-founder of Efficient Frontier Advisors and author of “The Four Pillars of Investing,” endorsed a “safety-first” strategy in his interview with Benz. That approach focuses on securing reliable, inflation-protected cash flow to cover essential expenses.

The ideal way to achieve this is by building a laddered portfolio of Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS), a structure that helps retirees manage inflation risk while ensuring their basic income needs are met.

For Bernstein, addressing portfolio cash flows and securing inflation protection are “jobs one and two” in a sound retirement plan.

J.L. Collins, the author of “The Simple Path to Wealth,” offered another approach. Benz described his advice about keeping retirement portfolios as simple as possible, especially considering the potential cognitive decline in older age.

Collins recommended using a simple index fund-based portfolio with a bit of cash, focusing on core stock and bond market indexes, rather than overly complicated investments.

Advertisement

“[Collins] is very much on the side of trying to be as minimalist as you possibly can be when thinking about your retirement portfolio,” Benz said, “and there’s a lot to like about that idea.”

Each Tuesday, retirement expert and financial educator Robert Powell gives you the tools to plan for your future on Decoding Retirement. You can find more episodes on our video hub or watch on your preferred streaming service.

Finance

Norway faces dilemma on openness in wealth fund ethical divestments, finance minister says

Published

on

Norway faces dilemma on openness in wealth fund ethical divestments, finance minister says
When Norway’s $2.2 trillion wealth fund — the world’s largest — sells a company’s shares over ethical concerns, should it explain why? This seemingly simple question has ​become a dilemma for its guardians, the finance minister told Reuters, as a government commission reviews the rules that have made the fund a ‌global benchmark for ethical investing.
Continue Reading

Finance

Morgan Stanley sees writing on wall for Citi before major change

Published

on

Morgan Stanley sees writing on wall for Citi before major change

Banks have had a stellar first quarter. The major U.S. banks raked in nearly $50 billion in profits in the first three months of the year, The Guardian reported.

That was largely due to Wall Street bank traders, who profited from a volatile stock exchange, Reuters showed.

But even without the extra bump from stock trading, banks are doing well when it comes to interest, the same Reuters article found. And some banks could stand to benefit even more from this one potential rule change.

Morgan Stanley thinks it could have a major impact on Citi in particular.

Upcoming changes for banks

To understand why Morgan Stanley thinks things are going to change at Citi, you need to understand some recent bank rule changes.

Advertisement

Banks make money by lending out money, which usually comes from depositors. But people need access to their money and the right to withdraw whenever they want.

So, banks keep a percentage of all money deposited to make sure they can cover what the average person needs.

But what happens if there is a major demand for withdrawals, as we saw during the financial crisis of 2008?

That’s where capital requirements come in. After the financial crisis, major banks like Citi were required by law to hold a higher percentage of money in order to avoid major bank failures.

For years, banks had to put aside billions of dollars. Money that couldn’t be lent out or even returned to shareholders.

Advertisement

Now, that’s all about to change.

Morgan Stanley thinks Citigroup could see an uptick in profit. Getty Images

Capital change requirements for major banks

Banks that are considered globally systemically important banking organizations (G-SIBs) have a higher capital buffer than community banks as they usually engage in banking activity that is far more complicated than your average market loan.

The list depends on the size of the bank and its underlying activity, according to the Federal Reserve.

Current global systemically important banks

A proposal from U.S. federal banking regulators could drastically reduce the amount that these large banks have to hold in reserve.

Changes would result in the largest U.S. banks holding an average 4.8% less. While that might seem like a small percentage number, for banks of this size, it equates to billions of dollars, according to a Federal Reserve memo.

Advertisement

The proposed changes were a long time coming, Robert Sarama, a financial services leader at PwC, told TheStreet.

“It’s a bit of a recognition that perhaps the pendulum swung a little too far in the higher capital requirement following the financial crisis, making it harder for banks to participate in some markets,” he said.

Citi’s upcoming relief  

Citi is a G-SIB and as such, is subject to the capital requirement rules. And the fact that it could get 4.8% of its money back to spend elsewhere is why Morgan Stanley is so optimistic about the bank.

In a research note, Morgan Stanley analysts said they expect Citi’s annualized net income to be better than expected due to the upcoming capital relief.

Advertisement

While Citi stated its return on average tangible common equity (ROTCE), a type of financial measure, to be close to 13% by 2028, “the fact that Citi’s near-term and medium-term targets excluding capital relief were only marginally below our expectations including capital relief actually suggest upside to our numbers if Citi can deliver,” the note said.

More bank news

In fact, Citigroup’s own projections are likely conservative and it’s likely to show improvement each year, the analysts expanded.

“We have high conviction that the proposed capital rules will be finalized later this year and expect Citi can eventually revise the medium-term targets higher, suggesting further upside to consensus,” the Morgan Stanley analysts wrote.

Related: Citi just added an AI agent to your wealth management team

Advertisement

This story was originally published by TheStreet on May 11, 2026, where it first appeared in the Investing section. Add TheStreet as a Preferred Source by clicking here.

Continue Reading

Finance

Couple forced to live in caravan buy first home as ‘stars align’ in off-market sale

Published

on

Couple forced to live in caravan buy first home as ‘stars align’ in off-market sale
Natasha, 34, and Luke, 45, settled on their new home last month. (Source: Supplied)

Natasha Luscri and Luke Miller consider themselves among the lucky ones. The couple recently bought their first home in the northwest suburbs of Melbourne.

It wasn’t something they necessarily expected to be able to do, but some good fortune with an investment in silver bullion and making use of government schemes meant “the stars aligned” to get into the market. Luke used the federal government’s super saver scheme to help build a deposit, and the couple then jumped on the 5 per cent deposit scheme, which they say made all the difference.

“We only started looking because of the government deposit scheme. Basically, we didn’t really think it was possible that we could buy something,” Natasha told Yahoo Finance.

RELATED

Last month they settled on their two bedroom unit, which the pair were able to purchase in an off-market sale – something that is becoming increasingly common in the market at the moment.

Advertisement

Rather perfectly, they got it for about $20-30,000 below market rate, Natasha estimated, which meant they were under the $600,000 limit to avoid paying stamp duty under Victoria’s suite of support measures for first home buyers.

“They wanted to sell it quickly. They had no other offers. So we got it for less than what it would have gone for if it had been on market,” Natasha said.

“We didn’t have a lot of cash sitting in an account … I think we just got lucky and made some smart investment decisions which helped.”

It’s a far cry from when the couple couldn’t find a home due to the rental crisis when they were previously living in Adelaide and had to turn to sub-standard options.

“We’ve managed to go from living in a caravan because we were living in Adelaide and we couldn’t find a rental with our dogs … So we’ve gone from living in a caravan, being kind of tertiary homeless essentially because we couldn’t get a rental, to now having been able to purchase our first home,” Natasha explained.

Advertisement

Rate rises beginning to bite for new homeowners

Natasha, 34, and Luke, 45, are among more than 300,000 Australians who have used the 5 per cent deposit scheme to get into the housing market with a much smaller than usual deposit, according to data from Housing Australia at the end of March. However that’s dating back to 2020 when the program first launched, before it was rebranded and significantly expanded in October last year to scrap income or placement caps, along with allowing for higher property price caps.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending