Connect with us

Finance

Finance expert reveals simple trick to avoid inheritance battles for divorcees who meet new partners later in life

Published

on

Finance expert reveals simple trick to avoid inheritance battles for divorcees who meet new partners later in life

Legal and financial experts have revealed how couples who meet and remarry later in life can avoid nasty inheritance battles. 

Advertisement

Americans 65 and older are increasingly getting remarried following the death of their spouse or a divorce, according to research from the National Center for Family and Marriage Research at Bowling Green State University. 

But those finding love in their golden age may need to work out how they would split their assets – including real estate and retirement accounts.

They may also have disagreements over whose adult children inherits what.

To avoid these issues, Lee Meadowcroft, of Skinner Law in Portland, Oregon, told the New York Times he advises couples to simply keep their bank accounts separate – though he noted that it is difficult to maintain separate accounts.

‘Keeping everything separate seems to work the best, but it’s a rare couple who can actually do that for a long time,’ Meadowcroft admitted.

Advertisement

‘Although there are ways of protecting finances and keeping things very clear, practically, those things fall apart.’

In those cases, Meadowcroft suggested it may be better for older couples to simply stay together but not remarry.

Lee Meadowcroft, of Skinner Law in Portland, Oregon suggested older couples keep their assets separate

Americans 65 and older are increasingly getting remarried following the death of their spouse or a divorce

Americans 65 and older are increasingly getting remarried following the death of their spouse or a divorce

Advertisement

‘It can get so messy and it can cause so many problems,’ he said.

Michael Fiffik, a managing partner at Fiffik Law Group in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania agreed – noting that marriage triggers inheritance rules for certain retirement assets.

If one spouse has a retirement account, for example, they may be required to name the other as a beneficiary.

But if the spouse with the account wanted to bequeath the asset to someone else – say a child – he or she would have to get their new spouse to legally cede their right to it.

For some widows and widowers, remarriage may also mean forfeiting pension or Social Security benefits.

Advertisement

To avoid these issues, Meadowcroft recommended what one of his client couples, who were both in their 80s did and have a ceremonial marriage – but never actually obtain a marriage license.

‘They said, in the eyes of God, they’re married,’ Meadowcroft recounted. 

‘The state’s purpose for marriage doesn’t have anything to do with that. It’s simply who gets your stuff when you die.’ 

Sometimes it may make more sense for an older couple to not remarry

Sometimes it may make more sense for an older couple to not remarry

But for those who do decide to remarry, experts recommend taking a number of precautions – including getting a prenuptial agreement, life insurance and putting assets in a trust.

Advertisement

‘Having a prenup is important because it forces a conversation of what happens if this marriage ends because of death,’ Ginger Skinner, a colleague of Meadowcroft’s who works as a founder of an estate law practice in Portland, explained.

She noted that the discussion in itself can bring to light assumptions or differences between spouses, even if it is uncomfortable.

Life insurance, meanwhile, allows people to allocate assets intended to be inherited by spouses or children from previous relationships.

And for those who have significant assets, trusts can protect their financial legacy. 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Finance

Norway faces dilemma on openness in wealth fund ethical divestments, finance minister says

Published

on

Norway faces dilemma on openness in wealth fund ethical divestments, finance minister says
When Norway’s $2.2 trillion wealth fund — the world’s largest — sells a company’s shares over ethical concerns, should it explain why? This seemingly simple question has ​become a dilemma for its guardians, the finance minister told Reuters, as a government commission reviews the rules that have made the fund a ‌global benchmark for ethical investing.
Continue Reading

Finance

Morgan Stanley sees writing on wall for Citi before major change

Published

on

Morgan Stanley sees writing on wall for Citi before major change

Banks have had a stellar first quarter. The major U.S. banks raked in nearly $50 billion in profits in the first three months of the year, The Guardian reported.

That was largely due to Wall Street bank traders, who profited from a volatile stock exchange, Reuters showed.

But even without the extra bump from stock trading, banks are doing well when it comes to interest, the same Reuters article found. And some banks could stand to benefit even more from this one potential rule change.

Morgan Stanley thinks it could have a major impact on Citi in particular.

Upcoming changes for banks

To understand why Morgan Stanley thinks things are going to change at Citi, you need to understand some recent bank rule changes.

Advertisement

Banks make money by lending out money, which usually comes from depositors. But people need access to their money and the right to withdraw whenever they want.

So, banks keep a percentage of all money deposited to make sure they can cover what the average person needs.

But what happens if there is a major demand for withdrawals, as we saw during the financial crisis of 2008?

That’s where capital requirements come in. After the financial crisis, major banks like Citi were required by law to hold a higher percentage of money in order to avoid major bank failures.

For years, banks had to put aside billions of dollars. Money that couldn’t be lent out or even returned to shareholders.

Advertisement

Now, that’s all about to change.

Morgan Stanley thinks Citigroup could see an uptick in profit. Getty Images

Capital change requirements for major banks

Banks that are considered globally systemically important banking organizations (G-SIBs) have a higher capital buffer than community banks as they usually engage in banking activity that is far more complicated than your average market loan.

The list depends on the size of the bank and its underlying activity, according to the Federal Reserve.

Current global systemically important banks

A proposal from U.S. federal banking regulators could drastically reduce the amount that these large banks have to hold in reserve.

Changes would result in the largest U.S. banks holding an average 4.8% less. While that might seem like a small percentage number, for banks of this size, it equates to billions of dollars, according to a Federal Reserve memo.

Advertisement

The proposed changes were a long time coming, Robert Sarama, a financial services leader at PwC, told TheStreet.

“It’s a bit of a recognition that perhaps the pendulum swung a little too far in the higher capital requirement following the financial crisis, making it harder for banks to participate in some markets,” he said.

Citi’s upcoming relief  

Citi is a G-SIB and as such, is subject to the capital requirement rules. And the fact that it could get 4.8% of its money back to spend elsewhere is why Morgan Stanley is so optimistic about the bank.

In a research note, Morgan Stanley analysts said they expect Citi’s annualized net income to be better than expected due to the upcoming capital relief.

Advertisement

While Citi stated its return on average tangible common equity (ROTCE), a type of financial measure, to be close to 13% by 2028, “the fact that Citi’s near-term and medium-term targets excluding capital relief were only marginally below our expectations including capital relief actually suggest upside to our numbers if Citi can deliver,” the note said.

More bank news

In fact, Citigroup’s own projections are likely conservative and it’s likely to show improvement each year, the analysts expanded.

“We have high conviction that the proposed capital rules will be finalized later this year and expect Citi can eventually revise the medium-term targets higher, suggesting further upside to consensus,” the Morgan Stanley analysts wrote.

Related: Citi just added an AI agent to your wealth management team

Advertisement

This story was originally published by TheStreet on May 11, 2026, where it first appeared in the Investing section. Add TheStreet as a Preferred Source by clicking here.

Continue Reading

Finance

Couple forced to live in caravan buy first home as ‘stars align’ in off-market sale

Published

on

Couple forced to live in caravan buy first home as ‘stars align’ in off-market sale
Natasha, 34, and Luke, 45, settled on their new home last month. (Source: Supplied)

Natasha Luscri and Luke Miller consider themselves among the lucky ones. The couple recently bought their first home in the northwest suburbs of Melbourne.

It wasn’t something they necessarily expected to be able to do, but some good fortune with an investment in silver bullion and making use of government schemes meant “the stars aligned” to get into the market. Luke used the federal government’s super saver scheme to help build a deposit, and the couple then jumped on the 5 per cent deposit scheme, which they say made all the difference.

“We only started looking because of the government deposit scheme. Basically, we didn’t really think it was possible that we could buy something,” Natasha told Yahoo Finance.

RELATED

Last month they settled on their two bedroom unit, which the pair were able to purchase in an off-market sale – something that is becoming increasingly common in the market at the moment.

Advertisement

Rather perfectly, they got it for about $20-30,000 below market rate, Natasha estimated, which meant they were under the $600,000 limit to avoid paying stamp duty under Victoria’s suite of support measures for first home buyers.

“They wanted to sell it quickly. They had no other offers. So we got it for less than what it would have gone for if it had been on market,” Natasha said.

“We didn’t have a lot of cash sitting in an account … I think we just got lucky and made some smart investment decisions which helped.”

It’s a far cry from when the couple couldn’t find a home due to the rental crisis when they were previously living in Adelaide and had to turn to sub-standard options.

“We’ve managed to go from living in a caravan because we were living in Adelaide and we couldn’t find a rental with our dogs … So we’ve gone from living in a caravan, being kind of tertiary homeless essentially because we couldn’t get a rental, to now having been able to purchase our first home,” Natasha explained.

Advertisement

Rate rises beginning to bite for new homeowners

Natasha, 34, and Luke, 45, are among more than 300,000 Australians who have used the 5 per cent deposit scheme to get into the housing market with a much smaller than usual deposit, according to data from Housing Australia at the end of March. However that’s dating back to 2020 when the program first launched, before it was rebranded and significantly expanded in October last year to scrap income or placement caps, along with allowing for higher property price caps.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending