Connect with us

Finance

Social bonds: the human side of sustainable finance

Published

on

Social bonds: the human side of sustainable finance

After we take into consideration “ESG”, what most likely involves thoughts are ideas like “inexperienced finance” (due to the “E” for “environmental”). However this widespread acronym additionally refers to social motion. We’ll inform you about it right here.

Lately, the private and non-private sectors have modified like by no means earlier than. Services and products alone received’t minimize it for shoppers: they nonetheless need their wants for meals, clothes, transport and different issues coated; however extra of them are moved by considerations about social progress. Subsequently, extra corporations need to undertake “ESG” requirements — “E” for atmosphere, “S” for social and “G” for governance — of their dealings with stakeholders (i.e. staff, companions and clients, suppliers and broader society) to assist the planet (e.g. decreasing or neutralizing carbon emissions, recycling and preserving biodiversity); to follow institutional transparency and integrity; and to advertise social welfare.

In finance, issuing special-purpose bonds is without doubt one of the some ways ESG is being embraced in finance. Like “inexperienced bonds” (debt devices to fund eco-friendly initiatives), establishments partaking in sustainable finance can situation “social” bonds. Social bonds are debt devices used to finance or refinance social initiatives whose objective is to handle a typical drawback and assist these most susceptible.

To be nicely structured and yield outcomes, social bonds must have a set and measurable objective. If a social bond is issued to avoid wasting jobs, patrons might want to know what number of jobs it’s going to assist create (or save) and different details. That is one thing that units it aside from generic securities.

This text by Openbank (in Spanish) explains how inexperienced and social bonds are comparable and completely different. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Hong Kong finance chief urges Cathay to raise service quality to boost status

Published

on

Hong Kong finance chief urges Cathay to raise service quality to boost status

“We hope Cathay Pacific Airways will continue to improve service quality and support and enhance Hong Kong’s status as an international aviation hub,” Chan wrote in his weekly blog.

“Looking forward, local airlines should actively expand their route networks in response to the needs of economic development, business connections and public travel and facilitate the country’s Air Silk Road strategy.”

The “Air Silk Road” is the aviation connectivity part of President Xi Jinping’s Belt and Road Initiative, a China-centred trade network covering more than 100 countries.

Chan said the aviation corridor would spur bilateral trade with these countries.

Xia urged the authority, which manages the international airport, to leverage its unique advantages under the “one country, two systems” governing principle and to continue contributing to national development.

Advertisement
Financial Secretary Paul Chan Chan says Cathay’s ability to fully take back preference shares marks the “steady return of Hong Kong’s aviation industry to full normality”. Photo: May Tse

The financial secretary said he also expected more business exchanges and closer ties between Hong Kong and the Middle East after Cathay relaunched a direct flight to the capital Riyadh in October.

The relaunch will come months after a connection between the kingdom and Shenzhen, which got its first non-stop flights to the city on June 3 via China Southern Airlines, while Guangzhou also has direct services to Kuwait and Riyadh.

“More convenient transport between the two places will definitely strengthen closer exchanges between the two markets, bring together more new funds and create more new opportunities for Hong Kong’s financial market,” he said.

Cathay announced on Friday that it would buy back the remaining half of preference shares issued to the government, worth around HK$9.75 billion, and pay remaining dividends amounting to HK$2.44 billion up to July 31.

The shares were part of a government-led bailout in 2020 with a HK$39 billion recapitalisation package for Cathay, as the airline financially struggled amid a collapse of the global travel market.

Advertisement

The first half was bought back in December last year.

Chan said in his blog Cathay’s ability to fully take back the shares “marked the steady return of Hong Kong’s aviation industry to full normality”.

The finance chief said that, in 2020, the government had taken into account the overall interests of Hong Kong society, especially the need to maintain the city’s status as an international aviation hub, before investing HK$27.3 billion, comprising HK$19.5 billion for preference shares and HK$7.8 billion in bridging loans, in Cathay.

“This special investment arrangement made under such an extraordinary period achieved win-win results,” he said.

“On the one hand, Cathay gained financial liquidity, was able to survive its difficulties, and restore capacity fairly quickly.

Advertisement

“At the same time, this investment brought a return of nearly HK$4 billion to our coffers.”

Cathay in March reported a net profit of HK$9.78 billion last year, its first since 2019, after a net loss of HK$6.62 billion in 2022.

The company earlier pushed back its original plan to return to 100 per cent passenger capacity from the end of 2024 to the first quarter of 2025.

The Post has contacted Cathay for comment.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Finance director Steve Charelian retires after 35 year career with the City of MB

Published

on

Finance director Steve Charelian retires after 35 year career with the City of MB

by Mark McDermott 

Finance Director Steve Charelian is retiring after a 35 year career with the City of Manhattan Beach. His final day is July 5. 

Charelian has served as the head of the Finance Department since 2018, taking over after his predecessor, Bruce Moe, was named City Manager. He had big shoes to fill. Moe was lauded locally and regionally for his stewardship of city finances and particularly in helping Manhattan Beach earn its much-vaunted AAA bond rating, the highest credit rating possible for a city. 

Charelian proved more than up to the task. During his tenure, the City faced one of the biggest financial challenges in its history, the COVID-19 pandemic. Charelian provided a steady, experienced hand, and the City emerged from the pandemic on strong footing. Charelian was instrumental in helping the City make some critical course corrections, such as seizing on historically low interest rates to issue $91 million in pension obligation bonds, saving an estimated $31.8 million over the next 25 years in retirement costs. Likewise, Charelian played a key role in addressing gaps in City funding, including an increase to its transient occupancy tax that generated $1.25 million annually and helped pay for 10 additional police officers; and the passage of a ballot measure last fall that provided $2.1 in annual revenue, replacing a subsidy of the City’s Storm Water Drain enterprise fund that had already bled the City’s General Fund of $6 million and threatened to take another $11.6 million over the next five years. 

Moe, at the June 4 council meeting at which Charelian introduced his final budget, took a moment to praise the finance director for the vital, time-consuming, and often thankless tasks he undertook. 

Advertisement

“Steve has just been a tremendous asset to the City,” Moe said, referencing Charelian’s accomplishments over the last six years. “The one thing I’ll say about Steve, is he’s kind of like that song, ‘Put me in coach, I am ready to play.’ It didn’t matter how much was on Steve’s plate, he would always come to me and say, ‘How can I help you?’ And that was true with the TOT, the pension obligation bonds, any of those projects. Steve was the first one to step up and say, ‘I know I’ve got a lot of shrimps on my barbie,’ as he would say, but he was always willing to take on additional. I want to publicly thank Steve for that.” 

Charelian said the he as not a “maestro with words” like Moe, but offered a few words to mark the occasion. He began his career with Manhattan Beach in July, 1989, he noted, which was only two months after Moe was hired by the city. 

“So we kind of had that career path together and grew together and learned and everything together,” he said. “My 35 year tenure has been filled with wonderful professional opportunities. I really want to express my gratitude to Bruce for entrusting me with the role of finance director. For nearly the last six years together, we achieved significant milestones of fortifying the city’s financial framework.” 

Charelian and Moe were both devotees of former City Controller Henry Mitzner, the no-nonsense municipal philosopher who worked for the City of Manhattan Beach for 48 years before retiring in 2020. Charelian learned early in his career, by observing Mitzner, that that traditional 9 to 5 workweek meant nothing —  weekends, early mornings and late nights, he’d see Mitzner come to City Hall when there was work that needed to be done. Through the years, Mitzner peppered him with words of wisdom from his own heroes —  the likes of football coach Vince Lombardi and basketball coach John Wooden. Charelian recalled one of those Wooden quotes at the time of Mitzner’s retirement: “Success comes from knowing that you did your best to become the best that you are capable of becoming.” 

At this week’s meeting, Charelian’s last, the City Council held a brief ceremony recognizing his contributions. Moe recalled an instance in which Charelian did just what that Wooden quote advised, although in a uniquely Charelianesque way. In 2008, the City’s revenue service director was retiring, Moe said, and Charelian applied for the position. Moe was hesitant, because he just didn’t think Charelian was “quite ready.”  

Advertisement

“And Steve, being the social guy that he is, and the closer that he is, invites me to Il Fornaio for a happy hour,” Moe recalled. “So we sit there, and by the end of 45 minutes and a couple glasses of wine and a few margherita pizzas, Steve had me convinced, because he brought so many qualities… that gave me a nice runway. He was just always there, on the spot, to get things done. But it was that enthusiasm, that intangible thing that you can’t necessarily learn. It’s just part of Steve’s personality that really sold it, and I never looked back.” 

Mayor Pro Tem Amy Howorth went through the many notes of recognition sent by neighboring cities as well as MBUSD, State Senator Ben Allen, U.S. Congressman Ted Lieu, and even more unusually —  particularly for a finance director —  the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department and State Treasurer Fiona Ma. 

“So you have touched not just all of us and the residents in our town, but obviously been a presence in the county and have been recognized by state leaders,” Howorth said. “It is so well deserved and well earned. You have done excellent work with your whole heart, and you’ve even convinced some of my colleagues that they were wrong, I’ve been told…. [which speaks to] how much we have trusted your judgment and how much that has meant to all of us in our community. Because there’s numbers on a page, but they tell a story, and you have helped us understand that story, and write the story for our community.” 

Councilperson Steve Napolitano, who was first elected to council in 1992, three years after Charelian began his career, said he was among those sometimes convinced to change his mind by Charelian’s arguments. 

“I want to say, Steve, as a friend, we’ve shared a lot of thoughts together and dedication to this city,” Napolitano said. “And you know that thing about being wrong and changing gears? We’ve had so many great discussions over the years where I think we’ve pushed each other to get outside the norm and our comfort zones. We’ve gotten —  you’ve gotten —  a number of things passed that have put this city on a financial foundation that is going to keep us in good stead, especially our recent vote on storm drains. You’ve helped get us 20 years of good budgets, and now we need to address our CIP [Capital Improvement Projects] and you’ve set us up for that.” 

Advertisement

“The good folks who work in any institution, especially here in the City, are the ones who leave the place better than how they found it,” Napolitano said. “And Steve, you’ve done an amazing job here. You’re leaving Manhattan Beach in a better place than you found it…As a dedicated employee who bleeds Manhattan Beach, you can’t look for a better employee than someone who just believes in what they’re doing.” 

Councilperson Richard Montgomery, who worked closely with Charelian as mayor during the Great Recession and then again as mayor at the onset of the pandemic, said that so much of what Charelian has done is work that is essential but unknown to the general public, such as successfully “clawing” for federal reimbursement for funds needed during the pandemic. 

“All these things you don’t see behind the scenes, this is the guy who made it happen,” Montgomery said. “Along with Bruce, and learning from Howard Fishman in Risk Management, and Henry Mitzner from the old Finance days. It’s a long succession of leaders here, and in finance you don’t see them all, and all the work goes unheralded. But we know what they do.” 

Mayor Joe Franklin presented a gift from the City, a green street sign that said, “Charelian Way.” 

“We are going to add that to Google Maps, right?” Franklin said. 

Advertisement

Charelian closed with some brief remarks, thanking his wife, RC, and his sons Knox and Chase, as well as the council and the City employees he worked alongside. Charelian, a Manhattan Beach resident whose unconventional professional journey began at El Camino College, vowed to remain steadfast in his dedication to the community. 

“I leave with a profound sense of gratitude for the privilege of serving a City of Manhattan Beach employee for the past 35 years,” he said. “The lessons learned and relationships forged will forever hold a special place in my heart. Thank you all for this incredible opportunity and for being part of my remarkable journey. This isn’t goodbye, but I’ll see you later.” ER

Continue Reading

Finance

NYS public-campaign-finance fraud exposes state board’s utter incompetence

Published

on

NYS public-campaign-finance fraud exposes state board’s utter incompetence

New York state’s new public-campaign-funding scheme couldn’t be more ripe for fraud and abuse.

In the lead-up to the June 25 primaries, the state’s Public Campaign Finance Board doled out more than $8.6 million in matching-fund payments to 69 state legislative candidates — with no real guardrails to prevent shady candidates from ripping off the taxpayers.

The board looks to be as feckless as the Cannabis Control Board, which not-so-coincidentally was also launched under Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

In a fit of responsible local journalism, The New York Times has chronicled, how Dao Yin, a Flushing Democrat who filed to run for state Assembly, apparently used straw donors to scam the system out of $162,800 in taxpayer-financed matching funds.

Naturally, New York funds the most generous statewide public-matching-funds system in the nation: A single $50 donation nets $600 in public funds while a maximum $250 contribution garners $1,800.

Advertisement

For contributions between $5 and $250 from legislative district residents, the public match is 12-to-1 for first $50, 9-to-1 for next $100 and 8-to-1 for the following $100.

And the board’s “oversight” doesn’t seem to go much beyond sending out the checks.

The Times’ review of Yin’s contribution cards found a host of red flags:

  • At least 48 alleged donors who said they never heard of Yin denied making the alleged contributions and said their signatures were forged; some said they no longer resided at the addresses listed.
  • Almost $28,000 in cash coming from small donors.
  • Most of his his donations, 80%, came in cash — about 15 times the average cash share of contributions for Assembly candidates participating in the system.
  • Multiple “donor” records missing key required contact information or with other errors.
  • Dao Yin was the campaign treasurer, chief fundraiser and candidate.

The board liaison to the Yin campaign missed all of this — and took Yin’s word that he sent so-called “good-faith” letters to validate questionable donors.

To be fair, the city Campaign Finance Board may have been as lax: For his 2020 borough president and 2021 City Council campaigns, he got over $1 million in city matching funds.

Advertisement

(The city board also needs to complete its 2023 City Council campaign audits, too, as the 2025 election season is upon us.)

The state idiocy was baked in from the start:

An April 2018 Siena poll found that nearly two-thirds of New York voters opposed public funding of state elections when told it would cost an estimated $100 million every two years — at least.

But Cuomo and the Legislature went ahead anyway, creating a commission to devise the system in March 2019.

They stacked it with political operatives, such as election lawyer and former de Blasio fixer Henry Berger and state Democratic Party boss Jay Jacobs — for whom Cuomo suspended a state regulation that prevented political party bosses from serving in “policy making” posts in state government.  

Advertisement

Today, the PCFB chair and vice chair are former state lawmakers Barbara Lifton (D) and Brian Kolb (R): That is, bipartisan patronage posts.

But the geniuses also left basic guardrails missing, such as:

  • Mandatory post-election audits of every campaign.
  • Sufficient staff to review and monitor campaign filings.
  • The board has no independent subpoena power to pursue rogue campaigns.

Hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer money for political appointees to dole out is a magnet for the corrupt.

The state program is a boon for incumbent lawmakers and their unscrupulous challengers — and another needless drain on taxpayers’ wallets.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending