Culture
MLB’s Strange But True 2024: The team, game, inning and homer of the year — plus The Ohtani Game
I swear this all happened in the Strange But True baseball year of 2024:
A man played for both teams in the same game. … Another guy made an out on his own intentional walk. … And history was made at Coors Field, all because a pitcher did not throw a pitch.
I mention all that because it’s time once again for the end-of-year extravaganza you’ve been waiting for — and we have enough material for three parts. Happy Strange But True Feats of the Year column to all who celebrate!
Clonehead of the Year — Danny Jansen
Danny Jansen takes the field with the Red Sox on Aug. 26 after starting the game — on June 26 — as a member of the Blue Jays. (Paul Rutherford / Getty Images)
Cloning technology isn’t roaring along at the same furious rate as, say, TikTok video technology. But in baseball, we have the next best thing to cloning — the suspended-game rule.
And how great is that rule — baseball’s special little world of suspended animation? So great that it gifted us with one of my favorite Strange But True Games of all time.
Presenting … The Danny Jansen Game.
Do we need to refresh your memory of what The Danny Jansen Game was? Let’s do that. On Aug. 26, the Red Sox and Blue Jays resumed a June 26 game at Fenway Park that had been suspended by many, many raindrops in the second inning.
What made that The Strange But True Game of the Year was this: When it was halted in June, Jansen was batting for the Blue Jays. And when it resumed (one awesome Sox-Jays trade-deadline extravaganza later), Jansen was catching for the Red Sox.
So what’s so Strange But True about that? Oh, only about a billion things like this:
Wanna play catch? It makes no logical sense that a player could get taken out of a game, and then, at the same exact moment, get subbed into that game for the other team — allowing him to start an actual big-league at-bat as the hitter and then finish it as the catcher. But hey, the suspended-game rule is inventive like that.
So who else has ever batted and caught in the same at-bat in a big-league game? Nobody. Obviously. But also …
The guy who was on first base when Jansen came to bat for the Blue Jays (Davis Schneider) then stole second base … on Danny Jansen the catcher!
All in the same at-bat, Jansen swung at a pitch as a Blue Jay and caught a pitch for the Red Sox!
As the brilliant multitasker he is, Jansen managed to come to bat for both teams in the top and bottom of the same inning (the second). If you’re wondering who else in history has done that, you should know that answer would also be: Nobody!
And don’t check the video, because while we have plenty of video evidence that Jansen set foot in the batter’s box for the Blue Jays in this game … and was stuck there for the next seven weeks (not literally!) … he did not get credit for a plate appearance for the Blue Jays. What do you mean, you saw it with your own eyes? Who cares? It’s baseball!
And don’t do the math, because that’s also a problem. Jansen got credited with a game played for Toronto that day. He also got credited with a game played for Boston. But he did not get credited with two games played in the same game. Because that’s not possible. So when does one plus one equal one? Only in … baseball!
And because the baseball gods are awesome, the last batter of this game could only have been one man: Danny Jansen, who caught the first pitch of the game for one team and then made the last out of the same game for the other team.
Well, there you go. All of that happened. In real life. We saw it. Danny Jansen lived it. It was real, and it was sensational.
So how, I asked him, would he explain to his grandkids someday that it was possible to play for both teams in the same game … in the major leagues?
“Baseball is incredible,” he said. “It’s always incredible. You can’t expect that anything in baseball can’t happen. Anything’s possible.
“This game,” said Jansen, “is nuts.”
Strangest But Truest Inning of the Year
Jazz Chisholm Jr. can’t handle Anthony Volpe’s throw as Kiké Hernández is safe at third in a nightmare fifth inning for New York. (Wally Skalij / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)
Speaking of nuts, what do you say we relive the fifth inning of Game 5 of the World Series. (All you Yankees fans out there … you’re not eligible to reply to that question!) Of course, we need to relive it. It’s in the running for the Strangest But Truest postseason inning ever.
To refresh your memory …
• When that inning began, the Yankees were leading the Dodgers in this game, 5-0 …
• And their starting pitcher, a literally unhittable dude named Gerrit Cole, was out there launching Formula 1 speedballs clocked at 99 mph …
• And the Dodgers had used many more pitchers (four) than they had hits (none) …
Whereupon … stuff began happening … by which I mean stuff like this, which involved the Yankees making baseball look so much harder than we’d like to think it is …
• There was Aaron Judge clanking a routine fly ball in center field. That was one error — by a guy who has committed zero errors on any of the other 538 fly balls hit to him in the center-field portion of his career.
Judge is not able to make the grab on that one, and the Dodgers have 2 on with nobody out!
📺: FOX pic.twitter.com/S8c5QGQljm
— FOX Sports: MLB (@MLBONFOX) October 31, 2024
• There was the shortstop, Gold Glove finalist Anthony Volpe, making an unfortunate throw to third on an attempted forceout. That was two errors.
Not making an excuse for Volpe on this play. But not enough credit given to Kike Hernandez for shrinking the throwing lane. You can see his margin for error diminishing as the play develops. Perfect example of pressuring the defense, forcing them to make plays to beat you. pic.twitter.com/QOg4tDaK9y
— Gary Patchett (@gpickit25) October 31, 2024
• And then, with Cole one pitch away from escaping a bases-loaded, no-out disaster, he forgot one slight detail after Mookie Betts bounced a spinning five-hopper to Anthony Rizzo at first — the detail that involves a pitcher’s brain reminding him he’s supposed to cover first base on balls like that.
UNBELIEVABLE:
With two outs and the bases loaded, Mookie Betts drives in a run on an infield single after Gerrit Cole fails to cover first base.
Anthony Rizzo fielded the ball, but had no one to throw it to! A cautionary tale for pitchers. pic.twitter.com/fpbxnvbUHE
— Not Gaetti (@notgaetti) October 31, 2024
Technically, there was no “error” charged to Cole for that gaffe. But the magic word there is “technically,” because a zero-run inning became a five-run inning after Cole neglected to cover first.
So an inning that started with a Gerrit Cole no-hitter watch turned into an almost incomprehensible five-run inning for that team he was no-hitting. And not just any five-run inning. A five-run inning in which all five runs were unearned.
Which meant the Dodgers would go on to win the World Series … by winning a game in which they trailed by five runs. And just so we’re clear, that’s a sentence that has never before been typed in the history of the World Series. But that’s not all, because …
How many other teams have ever had a game in which they …
• Blew a five-run lead (or larger)?
• Coughed up at least five unearned runs?
• Stuffed three errors into the box score?
• And included both a balk and catcher’s interference in those festivities?
How many teams have ever done that, you ask? According to our friends from STATS Perform, exactly one team has ever done that … at least since earned (and unearned) runs became an official stat in both leagues in 1913. And that team was …
The 2024 Yankees … in the game that ended this World Series.
But you should also know that … we’re not just talking about postseason games. The Yankees are the first team ever to do that in any game — postseason or regular season — in the past 112 seasons.
In other words, before that fateful evening on Oct. 30, you could have told us it was impossible to lose a World Series in a game like that, and who could have disputed it? But now … uh, never mind!
GO DEEPER
Inside the Yankees’ grisly fifth inning that proved one of the most costly in World Series history
Special Game 5 bonus note
What’s it like to be me, the unofficial curator of Baseball Strange But Trueness, after a World Series game like that? Hey, it’s awesome, because Strange But True Max Chaos had just busted out. But also … it can take a little time to sort out just how Strange But True something actually was.
It takes so much time, in fact, that I didn’t send in my column on that game until 7:05 the next morning!
But that’s because it literally took all night for me — plus the great Sam Hovland and my friends from STATS — to research all that wackiness. There were so many wild research projects going on, it wasn’t until the next day — when my brain fog lifted — that I remembered something.
I forgot to include one of STATS’ best notes of the whole night! But thanks to the Strange But True Feats of the Year column, we can present that tidbit now. Here it comes.
It turns out that it’s not just hard for a team to lose a World Series game in which it took a no-hitter and a five-run lead (or larger) into the fifth inning. It’s hard to do that in any kind of game. It’s so hard, in fact, that the Yankees hadn’t even lost a regular-season game like that since …
Oct. 1, 1988!
A Tommy John no-hit bid went up in smoke that day. And that was nearly 6,000 games ago!
It was so long ago that 177 different pitchers have started a game for the Yankees since then … so long ago that 441 different Yankees have grabbed a bat and headed for the batter’s box since then … and so long ago that Derek Jeter, Bernie Williams and Jorge Posada alone combined to bat almost 30,000 times in between — and then spent another decade in retirement.
In other words, a loss like that never happened to Jeter, Posada or Bernie in any October baseball game, or any other kind of baseball game. But it somehow happened to the Yankees, in the last game of this World Series, because, as John Sterling would tell you — Susan, that’s …
Baseball!
GO DEEPER
Why Dodgers’ Game 5 win over Yankees was the craziest World Series clincher ever
Sneaky Pete’s Strangest But Truest Homer of the Year
Did you know that thanks to that Game 5 Yankees meltdown, this October set the all-time record for most lead changes in one postseason (with 30 of them)? My friend Katie Sharp of Baseball Reference went to way too much trouble to calculate that little nugget. So thanks, Katie!
That tidbit tells us there were far too many epic Strange But True October comebacks to fit into this column. But if I had to pick the Strangest But Truest of them all, I’m going with this one.
Oh my God. Pete Alonso just hit a go-ahead, three-run homer in the ninth inning off Devin Williams.
Pete Alonso has his Mets moment. Wow. Just wow. pic.twitter.com/WfVyxktAL4
— Anthony DiComo (@AnthonyDiComo) October 4, 2024
So what made that stunning swing of the bat by Pete Alonso so Strange But True? Thanks for asking!
Did that really happen? As the Mets came to bat in the ninth inning that night, in a winner-take-all Game 3 of their Wild Card Series in Milwaukee …
• They were trailing that game, 2-0, and were three outs from making tee-time reservations.
• None of their previous 17 hitters had gotten a hit! (They were 0-for-16, with one hit batter!)
• No Met but Francisco Lindor had gotten a hit since the seventh inning of Game 2! (His teammates were 0 for their last 29!)
• 105 Mets hitters had dug into the batter’s box in this series. They’d combined to hit zero home runs!
• Pete Alonso, who was about to bash that life-changing home run, was 5 for his past 41 (a .122 average) … and hadn’t had an extra-base hit since Sept. 19!
• The man on the mound, normally untouchable Brewers closer Devin Williams, hadn’t allowed a home run, to anyone, in 57 days — spanning 78 consecutive hitters. So since that last home run, the unfortunate humans who had to face him were batting .097, and “slugging” .153. And 36 of those 78 (46.2 percent) had struck out!
And then that closer served up a homer to that hitter in the ninth inning of that game, a winner-take-all October special? Whoa. But wait. It was even more improbable than that. Let’s talk more about …
The Devin Williams Factor — October is quite a month, isn’t it? You watch baseball, day after day, month after month, from April to September. You start to think you have a rough idea of what to expect. But if you’d spent any time watching Devin Williams, you would never have expected that.
• How many runs did the Brewers closer allow all season? That would be three, in 22 appearances. How many runs did he allow in the ninth inning of this game? That would be four. Granted, he was hurt for the first four months. But think about it. He gave up more runs in that inning than he’d given up all season? How Strange But True is that?
• This was the 116th time Williams had thrown a pitch in the ninth inning of any game, regular season or postseason, in his career. Want to guess how many times he’d allowed a lead-flipping (i.e., leading to trailing) home run in the ninth of any of those other 115 games? If you guessed “none,” you’re thinking right along with us here.
• Then there was that pitch. Until that wave of Alonso’s bat, Williams had thrown 190 of his killer changeups this season, according to Statcast. So how many of those 190 changeups had landed on the other side of the fence? Once again, “none” would be a great guess.
• And finally, there’s this: Think about how many pitchers have gone to the mound at least 150 times in the live-ball era. You know which of those pitchers had allowed the lowest slugging percentage in their whole career, when pitching with a lead? I think you do.
The answer, according to Baseball Reference/Stathead, was Devin Williams! Opposing hitters who found themselves in the position the Mets were in had “slugged” .254 against him. And then that happened.
With the odds stacked against him, Pete Alonso powered the Mets to a series-clinching win. (John Fisher / Getty Images)
Hey, but one more thing. Before we move on, you need to contemplate …
Where this fits on the list of iconic October moments – In Tim Britton’s sensational piece on this game in The Athletic, this Pete Alonso passage jumped out at me:
Did he understand Thursday night the magnitude of what he’d just achieved?
“Not right now,” he said with a smile, before a pause. “I don’t think I ever will.”
Or maybe he’ll stumble upon this edition of the Strange But True Feats of the Year column. What was the magnitude of this moment? Let’s fill him in on just how magnitudinous it really was.
A lead-flipping home run in the ninth inning of a winner-take-all game? OK, Pete. Take this in. The complete list of men who have ever hit one of those consists of … just you!
Yes, you read that right. No one in history had ever hit a home run, in the ninth inning of a winner-take-all postseason game, that turned a series loss into a series win until …
Pete Alonso hit That Homer off That Closer to leave Mets fans — and Strange But True fans — everywhere That Moment to remember him by. Amazin’.
GO DEEPER
Pete Alonso’s amazin’, improbable October home run and a Mets comeback for the ages
Strangest But Truest Team of the Year — the White Sox
Andrew Vaughn holds his head as the White Sox finish the final week of a brutal season. (Michael Reaves / Getty Images)
They lost more games than Choo Choo Coleman’s fabled 1962 Mets. Their fans tried to avoid recognition by hiding their faces under paper bags.
Their manager, Pedro Grifol, made it to 100 games under .500 (in less than two years), then got fired. They went nearly four weeks without winning a game. And when they finally won one, their stadium ran out of beer to wash it down with.
These were just the “highlights” of the Strange But True season of those 2024 Chicago White Sox. I promise I didn’t root for them to do any of this stuff. But I must admit that because they did, this portion of the column practically wrote itself.
How can there not be a major motion picture about this team? Out of the Money-ball. I’d watch it! Now here’s just some of what you’d see.
They knocked Casey Stengel out of the history books! Who said a team couldn’t lose more games than Stengel’s illustrious ’62 Mets (40-120), the longtime gold standard for futility? These White Sox proved it was totally possible. They even won five of their last six and still went 41-121.
How nuts was that? The Phillies won their 41st game on May 31. The White Sox won their 41st on the last day of the season … 121 days later!
They finished 41 games out of next-to-last place! Was 41 the ultimate White Sox magic number? The next-closest team in the AL Central (the Twins) finished 41 games ahead of them. And there was never a day all season when the White Sox were ahead of any team in their division.
The ’62 Mets only finished 18 games out of next-to-last place. The 119-loss 2003 Tigers only finished 20 games out of next-to-last. The worst team in the history of the planet, the 134-loss 1899 Cleveland Spiders, only finished 35 games out of next-to-last place. No team in the modern era had ever even finished 40 games out of next-to-last. But the White Sox were already 38 out of next-to-last before they even made it to September.
You didn’t need a web browser to find them in the standings. You needed a submarine.
They fell to 84 under .500! If you looked at the standings on Sept. 22, with a week to go in the season, I hope you wore your eclipse glasses — because the White Sox were an eyeball-shocking 84 games under .500 (36-120).
So how many other teams since 1900 have ever been 84 under at any point? None would be a good guess.
Only three other teams in the history of this sport reached 84 under — and it’s been a while: Those 1899 Spiders finished 114 under (20-134). … Kirtley Baker’s 1890 Pittsburgh Alleghenys finished 90 under (23-113). … And Toad Ramsey’s 1889 Louisville Colonels finished at exactly 84 under (27-111). Always great to walk with legends like those outfits.
They even caught Jeff Stone’s illustrious ’88 Orioles! What group of legendary losers didn’t the White Sox bring back to life this year? They even ran down the team with the longest losing streak in American League history, Jumpin’ Jeff Stone’s 1988 Orioles.
Those Orioles lost their first 21 games of the season, then spent the next three and a half decades in an orbit of their own. But here came the 2024 White Sox, to dredge up their own brand of 21-game losing-streak fun from July 10 to Aug. 5.
• You know how hard it is to go that long without winning? It’s so hard that 197 different pitchers won a game for the other 29 teams in that time when the White Sox were winning zero games. Yep, 197!
• It also takes a while to lose that many games. It took the White Sox so long that they used 38 different players during the streak. Yep, 38!
• One of those 38 was a rookie infielder named Brooks Baldwin. The really cool news was, he made his big-league debut for the White Sox on July 19. The not quite that cool news was, of the first 16 games he played in, his team lost all 16 of them.
• Oh, and one more thing: According to the Baseball Reference transactions page, since the trade deadline was going on during this run of ineptitude, an incredible 171 players got traded — all in that stretch when the White Sox never won a single freaking baseball game.
In other news, they also did all this!
• Would you believe the White Sox started the season by going 0-14 on games played on a Monday? Of course, they were 66 games under .500 on the other six days of the week, too.
• Would you believe they had a streak in the second half in which they went 1-27 at home? The Phillies only lost 26 games in Philadelphia the whole darned season. The White Sox lost 27 in their town in eight weeks.
• Would you believe that, in a related development, on Aug. 28-29, the Rangers won more games at Guaranteed Rate Field in 24 hours (three) than the White Sox had won in the previous 61 days and 13,660 hours (two)?
• Would you believe this team piled up so many losses, it was eliminated from any kind of playoff race on Aug. 17? That was Game 124, but who’s counting?
• Would you believe the White Sox were so good at losing, they lost more games before the end of August (106) than Michael Jordan’s Bulls lost in their six championship seasons combined (104)?
• And, finally, would you believe these White Sox went more than four months — from May 11 to Sept. 15 — without winning a series against a team from their own league? But what the heck? They only got to play 23 of those series in between!
These were your 2024 Chicago White Sox, chasing history — kind of in the way that “Daddy Day Camp” (Rotten Tomatoes score: 1) chased cinematic history.
GO DEEPER
An owner who ‘thinks he knows everything’ led the White Sox to historic disaster
The man from the Planet Ohtanus
Shohei Ohtani had 17 total bases on his historic night in Miami. (Chris Arjoon / Getty Images)
I got to spend a few weeks this October watching Shohei Ohtani play. Here was the best part about doing that: I learned something about this guy.
There are many things in life — and also in baseball — that we’ve always described as “impossible.” But the man from Planet Ohtanus has no idea why the rest of us even use that word.
The stuff we think of as impossible is stuff he looks at and thinks: Hey, maybe I’ll wake up tomorrow and try to do that.
So that brings us to a performance we’ll dare to call The Ohtani Game. It might go down as the greatest game any baseball player has ever had. It’s also the game that most defied our ability to imagine what a human, a member of our species, could do over nine innings.
This was Sept. 19 in Miami — when Ohtani laid out this unfathomable Mission (Not) Impossible:
6-for-6
3 home runs
5 extra-base hits
2 stolen bases
10 RBIs …
And this box-score line never before witnessed in a major-league game:
6-4-6-10
Oh, yeah. And one more thing: It was in this game that he dropped all those feats on the day he became the first man ever to join the 50-Homer, 50-Steal Club.
Seriously!
A rare curtain call for an opposing player, as loanDepot Park celebrates Shohei Ohtani and his historic achievement tonight. pic.twitter.com/93RGG6XfQo
— Marlins on FanDuel Sports Network (@FDSN_Marlins) September 19, 2024
So what are we to make of this performance of the Greatest Shoh on Earth? I’ve been thinking about that for three months. Here’s what:
Three homers, 10 RBIs and two stolen bases! Steven Kwan led off for the AL in the All-Star Game — and he never had a calendar month this year with three homers, 10 RBIs and two stolen bases. Neither did Bo Bichette. Neither did Javy Báez. But that was one day in the life of Shohei Ohtani. Unreal.
Six hits in one game. Does that seem like a lot? Let’s go with yes. Here are just some of the guys who never had a six-hit game: Ted Williams … Stan Musial … Derek Jeter … and the hit king, Pete Rose, who never did that once along the road to 4,256 hits.
Five extra-base hits in one game. Did you know that Babe Freaking Ruth never got five extra-base hits in one game? Neither did Albert Pujols. How ’bout Barry Bonds? Nope. Not him, either. And remember the artist formerly known as José Abreu? He didn’t even get five extra-base hits all season. But the amazing Shohei got five in three hours, because why the heck not?
Three homers in one game. I know it seems like lots of random dudes are running around hitting three bombs in a game these days. But just for perspective, you want to hear the names of a few guys who never had a three-homer game? Well, David Ortiz for one. And Fred McGriff. Not to mention Vladimir Guerrero — both of them.
10 RBIs in one game. I could go on for hours spitting out the names of guys who never drove in 10 runs in one game. But here are a few you may be familiar with: Willie Mays. Mickey Mantle. Henry Aaron. Ted Williams. And Miguel Cabrera.
10 RBIs and two stolen bases in one game. So … do you think anybody else ever had a game with that many RBIs and that many steals? Get a grip. Before Ohtani, only 15 players had ever had a game with just the 10-RBI part of that daily double. You know how many stolen bases those 15 men combined for in those games? That would be exactly … zero!
10 RBIs from the leadoff hitter? Richie Ashburn was a Hall of Fame leadoff man for the Phillies. In 1959, he got to the plate 427 times in the leadoff hole – and drove in a total of eight runs. Sixty-five years later, along came this superhero from Planet Ohtanus — and drove in 10 out of the leadoff hole in six trips to the plate? Yeah, he did. So how many other leadoff hitters have ever had a 10-RBI game in the 105 seasons since RBIs became an official stat? Once again, that answer would be … zero!
Yeah, but he did all of that! Let’s sum it all up. As my friends from STATS reminded us, in those same 105 seasons, only one player has had, during his entire career …
• A game with 10+ RBIs
• A game with 6+ hits
• A game with 5+ extra-base hits
• A game with 3+ home runs
• A game with 2+ stolen bases
(That’s not necessarily in the same game. That’s in any combination of games.)
That one player? Shohei Ohtani.
Who did all of it in The Ohtani Game.
Welcome to one afternoon in the life of Shohei Ohtani, who ohbytheway also once started the All-Star Game as a pitcher and was the closer in the championship game of the World Baseball Classic. But as I was saying, nothing is impossible on Planet Ohtanus.
The Year in Strange But True
GO DEEPER
MLB’s most mind-blowing hitting, pitching feats of the year — plus the 5 most ridiculous games
GO DEEPER
MLB’s weirdest injuries of 2024: Beware of water bottles, heating pads and walls
(Top photo of Shohei Ohtani hitting his 50th home run of the season: Megan Briggs / Getty Images)
Culture
Ellen Burstyn on Her Favorite Books and Her Love of Poetry
In an email interview, she talked about why she followed up a memoir with “Poetry Says It Better” — and when and why she leans on the “For Dummies” series. SCOTT HELLER
Describe your ideal reading experience.
Next to a warm fire in a house in the woods. Barring that, at home in bed.
How have your reading tastes changed over time?
When I first began reading, I read fiction. My favorite novel was “The Magic Mountain,” by Thomas Mann. Over the years I find that I am less interested in fiction and more interested in trying to learn about science and mathematics. I love the “For Dummies” series. I remember reading or hearing many years ago, maybe in high school, that the first law of thermodynamics is that energy cannot be created or destroyed; it can only change form. So, I was thrilled to learn there was such a book as “Thermodynamics for Dummies.” It was interesting reading, but I’m afraid I could not quote you anything from that book.
What’s the best book you’ve ever received as a gift?
I received the “Rubaiyat” of Omar Khayyám from someone, probably from my first husband, Bill. It stimulated my love of poetry, beautifully illustrated books and also my fascination with the East and the Mideast.
Why write “Poetry Says It Better” rather than, say, a follow-up to your 2006 memoir?
“Poetry Says It Better” has some references to my life, but I feel I wrote enough about myself in my memoir, and I include some of my personal history in this book.
You write that you’ve memorized poems your whole adult life. What’s the last poem you memorized?
I am working on “Shadows,” by D.H. Lawrence. I am trying to get that securely in my memory. Of course, at 93 I am not as good at memorizing as I used to be, or at holding on to what I have already memorized. But it is good exercise for the memory to use it.
You quote a line from Kaveh Akbar: “Art is where what we survive survives.” Why does that line resonate so much for you?
That line is so meaningful to me because I know that the difficult first 18 years of my life is the emotional library I descend into for every part I’ve ever played, and every poem that has landed in my heart.
Of all the characters you’ve played across different media, which role felt the richest — the most novelistic?
I would have to say Lois in “The Last Picture Show.” She was a character I didn’t really understand right away. I had to dig for her. She was multidimensional. I feel literary characters are like that.
What’s the best book about acting, or the life of an actor, you’ve ever read?
I have to name two. “My Life in Art,” by Konstantin Stanislavsky, and “A Dream of Passion,” by Lee Strasberg.
How do you organize your books?
I’ve collected my library for 70 years. All my classic literature is together, on two facing walls in the front of my living room. On the other end of the room, I have my art books. Facing them are my travel and music books. On the fourth wall are some of my science books.
In the large entrance hall, I have one standing bookcase of the complete Carl Jung collection, and near it another bookcase of poetry anthologies. In my kitchen office are all the books about food. Then I have a writing room that contains books of poetry and science, and my Sufi books. In my bedroom are my spiritual and religious books.
What books are on your night stand?
Currently: “Anam Cara: Spiritual Wisdom From the Celtic World,” by John O’Donohue; “Prayers of the Cosmos,” by Neil Douglas Klotz; “The Courage to Create,” by Rollo May; “Radical Love,” by Omid Safi; Pema Chödrön’s “How We Live Is How We Die”; “The Trial of Socrates,” by I.F. Stone; “Our Green Heart: The Soul and Science of Forests,” by Diana Beresford-Kroeger; and “On Living and Dying Well,” by Cicero.
What book might people be surprised to find on your shelves?
Probably Ken Wilber’s “A Brief History of Everything” and Michio Kaku’s “Physics of the Future.” These are two of my favorite books. I love to read books on science that are not written for scientists but for curious readers like me.
You’re organizing a literary dinner party. Which three writers, dead or alive, do you invite?
Oh, definitely Mary Oliver, my favorite poet of all time, and Edgar Allan Poe. The thought of those two people talking to each other. Finally, Tennessee Williams, who’s written some of the greatest plays ever.
Culture
Speculative Fiction Books Full of Real Horrors
In most cases, truth is stranger than fiction. But sometimes we need strange fiction to show us the truth. My favorite works of science fiction and fantasy take place in a world that largely resembles our own, and shine a spotlight on the issues of today by blending fantastical imagination with real-world commentary.
Take “Buffy the Vampire Slayer.” High school is hell (literally). Coming out (as a Slayer) is hard. The man you love could transform after sex into someone you no longer recognize (say, a vampire). Allusions to the speculative are common in everyday speech: The untested drug is a “magic pill,” the horrible boss is the “devil himself,” or the female politician is “possessed by a Jezebel spirit.” Taking these propositions seriously can shine a light on what ails us (corporate greed, worker exploitation, good old-fashioned misogyny — take your pick). It’s also what inspired me to play with the idea of actual monsters haunting an abortion clinic in my latest novel, “We Dance Upon Demons,” after I was called a “demon” while volunteering at Planned Parenthood.
When used well, speculative elements take a familiar concept that our brains might otherwise gloss over as familiar and make it just different and exciting enough that we can see new or deeper dimensions. In contemporary stories, they create a gateway for the reader to put herself in a character’s shoes. It’s hard to imagine, for example, how I would fare in the Hunger Games (poorly, I’m sure), but I definitely know what I would do if I started seeing demons at work (Google symptoms of a brain tumor).
Here are some of my favorite books that make a contemporary feast out of the simple question: What if?
Culture
Frank Stack, Painter Who Secretly Drew ‘The Adventures of Jesus,’ Dies at 88
Frank Stack, an art professor and painter who secretly moonlighted as Foolbert Sturgeon, the satirical cartoonist who created “The Adventures of Jesus,” a chronicle of Christ’s encounters with sanctimonious hypocrites that is widely considered the first underground comic, died on April 12 in Columbia, Mo. He was 88.
The death, at a hospital, was confirmed by his daughter, Joan Stack.
Mr. Stack taught studio art at the University of Missouri and was well regarded for his intricate drawings, etchings and watercolor paintings, which he often composed alone, sitting cross-legged on a quiet riverbank.
As Foolbert Sturgeon — a persona he concealed for two decades to protect his day job — he lampooned religion, academia and the military, among other sacred tendrils of the 1960s and ’70s, signing his acerbic broadsides with his vaudevillian nom de plume.
“His comics were funny, well drawn and smart,” his friend the cartoonist R. Crumb said in an interview. “And he was a very, very fine watercolor artist and oil painter. He was the real thing.”
Mr. Stack was especially adept at nudes, once drawing Mr. Crumb’s wife, the feminist underground cartoonist Aline Kominsky-Crumb, in a state of total undress.
“He did a very fine job,” Mr. Crumb said. “He really knew anatomy.”
Mr. Stack did not become as famous (or notorious) as Mr. Crumb, a subversive and misanthropic character in San Francisco’s counterculture scene, whose heavily crosshatched, grotesquely sexual drawings came to define underground comics during the 1960s.
In contrast to Mr. Crumb, whose roguish demeanor was immortalized in the 1994 documentary “Crumb,” Mr. Stack worked secretively in the Midwest, his only notable behavioral quirk an ability to deliver astonishingly long monologues on seemingly any subject that occurred to him.
“Frank is an incredible story,” James Danky, a historian and co-author of “Underground Classics: The Transformation of Comics Into Comix” (2009), said in an interview, adding: “He’s not who you think he is. He’s more than that.”
Mr. Stack got his start in creative flippancy as a writer and then the editor of Texas Ranger, the humor magazine at the University of Texas at Austin, whose staffers, known as Rangeroos, have included the gossip columnist Liz Smith, the screenwriter Robert Benton and the comic book artist and publisher Gilbert Shelton.
After graduating in 1959 with a degree in fine arts, he worked briefly at The Houston Chronicle, one desk over from Dan Rather, and joined the Army Reserve. In 1961, he enrolled at the University of Wyoming for a master’s degree in art, but was called into active duty the same year following the Berlin Wall crisis.
Attached to a data processing unit on Governors Island in New York, he rented an apartment on West 94th Street and spent his evenings attending gallery openings, plays and art house movies with Mr. Benton and Mr. Shelton, who were also living in New York. He had no use for the Army.
“My entire company was constantly grumbling, grousing, growling, snarling, moaning and whining with discontent,” Mr. Stack wrote in “The New Adventures of Jesus: The Second Coming” (2006). “CBS actually sent a film crew to the island, but they were only allowed to speak with delegated individuals who, naturally, were hardly discontented at all.”
One day, Army officers distributed patriotic pamphlets titled “Why Me?”
“The gist was something about drawing a line in the sand to save the free world from communism. It didn’t go down well at all,” Mr. Stack wrote, adding that most, “if not all, of us thought it was ridiculous and insulting.”
He responded by drawing a cartoon on the back of a computer card depicting Christian martyrs being handed a pamphlet titled “Why Me?” as they entered an arena of hungry lions. He posted it on a bulletin board. A half-hour later, it had disappeared.
Undeterred, Mr. Stack continued drawing Jesus in a series of absurd situations — being arrested, registering to vote, attending faculty parties.
In one scene, a military police officer asks Jesus to produce his identification. “I don’t have one!” Jesus says. “I don’t have anything!” In another scene, Jesus walks on water by becoming a duck.
In 1962, the Austin gang in New York went their separate ways. Mr. Stack returned to Wyoming to finish his graduate studies in art. Mr. Shelton moved back to Austin for graduate school and to edit Texas Ranger.
Mr. Shelton loved the Jesus comics and had made copies for himself. He printed a few in a newsletter that he published locally. In 1964, with help from a friend who had access to a Xerox machine at the University of Texas law school, he made an eight-page book titled “The Adventures of Jesus.”
Scholars consider it to be the first underground comic. The cover credit went to “F.S.” because Frank Stack was now teaching at the University of Missouri, where demeaning Jesus, especially in comic-book form, probably wouldn’t have looked great on a curriculum vitae.
“I’ve always loved to see my stuff in print, but I was on the horns of a dilemma,” he wrote. “Did I dare to publish the cartoons under my own name when my job was at risk if the university ever noticed that I worked in the most disgraceful of all media — the awful COMIC BOOK?”
Instead, he created the ridiculous-sounding pen name Foolbert Sturgeon, which reminded him vaguely of Gilbert Shelton. Rising through the ranks of academia, he continued publishing Jesus strips.
“I kind of liked the anonymity of it — there wasn’t anything respectable about it, so you didn’t have to be careful about what you said,” he told The Comics Journal in 1996. “And of course, as a university professor, and as a painter, and as an ‘authority’ — as a role model — you do have to be careful about what you say.”
Frank Huntington Stack was born on Oct. 31, 1937, in Houston. His father, Maurice Stack, was an oil field supply salesman, and his mother, Norma Rose (Huntington) Stack, was a teacher.
Growing up, he drew constantly — on scraps of paper, the backs of envelopes, anything he could get his hands on. He loved newspaper comic strips, especially “Tarzan,” “Prince Valiant,” “Alley Oop” and “Krazy Kat.”
During high school, he visited an aunt who lived in Austin and worked at the University of Texas. There, he came across copies of Texas Ranger and decided to apply to the school, majoring in journalism before switching to fine arts. After he joined the humor magazine, one of the first artists he published was his classmate Mr. Shelton.
“He had something unusual at the time — an appreciation for things that made people laugh,” Mr. Shelton said in an interview.
Mr. Stack’s other books as Foolbert Sturgeon include “Dorman’s Doggie” (1979), about his dog, Pingy-Poo, and “Amazon Comics” (1972), an indecent retelling of Greek myths. He dropped the pen name in the late 1980s when he began collaborating with the underground comics writer Harvey Pekar on his “American Splendor” series.
In 1994, Mr. Stack illustrated “Our Cancer Year,” an autobiographical graphic novel by Mr. Pekar and his wife, Joyce Brabner, recounting Mr. Pekar’s battle with lymphoma.
The “narrative is by turns amusing, frightening, moving and quietly entertaining,” Publisher’s Weekly said in its review. “Stack’s brisk and elegantly gestural black-and-white drawings wonderfully delineate this captivating story of love, community, recuperation and international friendship.”
Mr. Stack married Mildred Powell in 1959. She died in 1998.
In addition to their daughter, he is survived by their son, Robert; six grandchildren; and his brother, Stephen.
Writing in “The New Adventures of Jesus,” Mr. Stack reflected on spending so many years as Foolbert Sturgeon.
“If I’d stuck by my guns maybe I’d be out of a job, disinherited, back in New York (not Texas, for sure) and dead by now,” he wrote. “But I ain’t apologizing. Who would I apologize to? God and Jesus? Why would they care?”
-
Mississippi3 minutes agoAlyssa Faircloth’s no-hitter is Mississippi State’s first in NCAA softball tournament
-
Missouri9 minutes ago
Missouri Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 winning numbers for May 16, 2026
-
Montana15 minutes ago
Montana Lottery Powerball, Lotto America results for May 16, 2026
-
Nebraska21 minutes agoNebraska heads to Big Ten Baseball Tournament as No. 2 seed
-
Nevada27 minutes agoCommunities In Schools of Nevada hires new CEO, state director
-
New Hampshire33 minutes ago
Advocates say there is ‘no substitute’ for research at Bartlett Experimental Forest
-
New Jersey39 minutes agoWorld to run low on oil by 1980s: From the Asbury Park Press archives
-
New Mexico45 minutes agoTed Maher, convicted in billionaire’s arson death in Monaco, reinvents himself & orders hit on estranged wife