Connect with us

Finance

Americans’ view of federal income taxes hits two-decade low

Published

on

Americans’ view of federal income taxes hits two-decade low

Americans’ view of federal income taxes hit a two-decade low with six in 10 saying they are paying too much, according to a new poll. 

The Gallup poll released on Friday showed 60 percent of respondents believe the amount in federal income taxes that they pay is too high, the most since 2001, while only 36 percent said they pay about the right amount. 

More people have said they pay too much in income tax than the right amount in most years that Gallup has asked the question, but the difference between the percentage who chose each of the options has not been quite as large.

Pollsters also found 46 percent said the income tax that they will have to pay this year is fair, the lowest since 1999. Just more than half said it is not fair, the most in the history of the poll. 

Gallup said the last time that Americans were so critical of federal income taxes came right before President George W. Bush signed his tax cut laws into effect. Income taxes have not significantly risen for low- and middle-class Americans since then, but wealthy Americans and companies have seen their taxes rise during the Obama and Biden administrations. 

Advertisement

Respondents overall indicated that they believe that the federal income tax is the worst, or least fair, tax that they pay. Just more than a third said the federal income tax is the worst, a 14-point increase from the 20 percent who said so the last time Gallup asked the question in 2005. 

The tax previously considered the worst, local property tax, fell from 35 percent in 2005 to 29 percent who chose it as the least fair now. 

The researchers also found a political component also exists when it comes to people’s attitudes about the fairness of the income taxes they pay. More than 70 percent of Republicans said their taxes are too high now, with a Democratic president in office, while only 46 percent said so in 2020 with former President Trump in office. 

Democrats’ views have remained mostly consistent, hovering around 40 percent, while the percentage of independents who view federal income taxes as too high rose from 46 percent to 62 percent in that timeframe. 

Gallup said in its analysis that the extent to which worsening views of federal income taxes are because of people paying more in total number of dollars, macroeconomic factors like inflation or misperceptions about the status of the income tax, possibly influenced by political beliefs, is unclear. 

It said most of the recent shift in views can be attributed to Republicans having more negative views of what they pay under Biden than under Trump. 

The poll was conducted from April 3-25 among 1,013 U.S. adults. The margin of error was 4 points.

Copyright 2023 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

The Biggest Finance Issues to Watch in 2025

Published

on

The Biggest Finance Issues to Watch in 2025

With a new administration in Washington and the long-expected end of federal pandemic aid, states are grappling with a new financial picture this year.

Changes to the tax code in Washington could affect revenues in states, as could increased tariffs. Medicaid is expected to be on the chopping block in Congress, to help pay for tax cuts. Serious cuts would have profound consequences for states’ bottom lines.

Still, states begin the year in pretty good financial shape. Budgets are mostly stable, with rainy-day funds remaining near record levels. A few states, however, are already seeing shortfalls — mostly blue states such as Maryland and Washington. Sales tax revenues have steadily been ticking down for months, while transportation spending has been ticking up.


Here’s a full picture of the biggest finance issues affecting states in 2025.

Budgets

After a period of rapid growth, overall state spending was flat last year. Heading into 2025, budgets are mostly in good shape, but there are several risk factors that should make lawmakers cautious. “It’ll be another year of slower spending and slower revenue growth,” says Brian Sigritz of the National Association of State Budget Officers.As has been long anticipated, extra federal aid from the pandemic era has mostly run out. State sales tax revenues have been in decline for several straight months. Expected tax and spending cuts at the federal level could have a profound effect on states, particularly if Medicaid is slashed. State and local governments receive a third of their revenues from Washington and Medicaid accounts for two-thirds of that money. “State budgets are facing significant risk with reduction of that support,” says Wesley Tharpe, a state tax expert at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a left-leaning think tank.

Advertisement

States are facing their own challenges at home. California, Maryland and Washington all face budget gaps in the billions this year and in the years to come. Although it’s mostly blue states facing big shortfalls, largely due to spending increases in recent years, red states are not immune. Some, including Iowa, Mississippi and West Virginia, enacted tax cuts that are ratcheting up with the start of the year. And the spread of school vouchers throughout Republican states is increasing costs. Half of the new spending called for in the budget proposal from Arkansas GOP Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders is devoted to vouchers.

“At first glance, most state budgets seem relatively stable, in terms of not seeing sharp declines in either revenue or spending, and rainy-day funds are sound,” Tharpe says. “Still, states are facing a set of multiple risk factors or strains.” — Alan Greenblatt

Medicaid

Medicaid has been in expansion mode in recent years, increasing payments to providers, expanding coverage and even paying, in some states, for non-medical interventions that can affect health, such as housing.

Those days are over. Medicaid is entering a new era of austerity. But just how austere is a huge, unanswerable question at this point.

As Congress considers ways to pay for tax cuts and other expenses expected in budget reconciliation bills this year, Medicaid is clearly a target. With Medicare and Social Security cuts seemingly off the table, Medicaid is the biggest remaining source of potential savings. On Capitol Hill, there’s already discussion of a variety of ways to cut Medicaid spending, including work requirements, per capita caps and lifetime limits, or converting parts of the program to block grants. “These directionally represent a future in which the Medicaid program will be attacked,” says Andrea Ducas, vice president of health policy at the Center for American Progress, a progressive think tank. “I worry about existential threats to the program.”

Advertisement

Aside from looking for savings, some conservatives object to the current imbalance in funding levels under the program. The federal government picks up 90 percent of the cost for those eligible under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), who are able-bodied adults, but less than 60 percent on average of the traditional Medicaid populations of children, adults living in poverty and nursing home residents. Medicaid is not only a strain on federal and state budgets, but delivers “substandard care” while crowding out private health insurance options, according to the conservative Heritage Foundation.

Nine states have trigger laws on the books that would end their Medicaid expansion programs if the extra spending under ACA goes away, while three more have laws in place that could ultimately have the same effect. In the 10 states that never expanded Medicaid under the ACA, the current atmosphere of likely cuts probably stops any momentum toward doing so.

Medicaid makes up an enormous share of state budgets — it’s their largest single spending item, counting federal dollars, and the second-largest expenditure of their own funds, after education. In addition to pushback from hospitals and physicians, serious Medicaid cuts will likely encounter resistance from governors worried about the enormous gap these could create both in terms of their finances and the health-care systems in their states.

So what’s going to happen? No one knows. If Medicaid is cut, it will likely be part of a second reconciliation package, centered on tax cuts, that may not pass until the end of the year — well after state budget-writing seasons are over. “We’re not going to know what could be changing in Medicaid,” says Hemi Tewarson, president of the National Academy for State Health Policy. “So states are going to have to make decisions around programs based on the facts they have before them today, which right now is uncertainty at the federal level.” — Alan Greenblatt

Insurance

Even before the fires in the Los Angeles area, insurance had emerged as a key concern for state lawmakers. More companies are pulling out of markets, leaving homeowners short on sources of protection.

Advertisement

The frequency of billion-dollar climate and weather disasters has increased nearly 250 percent in recent years. Insurers have been pulling back from disaster-prone states such as California and Florida for decades, but warmer oceans and air are causing dangerous and costly drought, rain, flood, wind and wildfire events throughout the country.

Improving resilience will be a priority following a punishing 2024, creating pressure for owner and community-based mitigation efforts. California’s new requirement that insurers offer discounts for wildfire protection is being watched by other states in the West, who want more evidence that damage will actually be reduced and claim costs go down.

New legislation in Georgia will give premium discounts to property owners who retrofit or build structures with features that help them withstand windstorms. Florida is exploring a similar strategy for condominiums. Lawmakers in Hawaii have asked the state insurance commissioner to submit a study on wildfire risk and market-based approaches to insurance before they meet in 2025.

California’s insurance commissioner believes providers will begin to come back following regulatory changes that allow insurers to set rates using catastrophe modeling that takes expected future risks into account. In exchange, they will be required to sell more policies in high-risk areas and offer safety discounts for wildfire mitigation efforts by communities and homeowners.

Since 1968, 33 states have enacted laws creating last-resort programs in which insurers share risk. Some of these state-administered, privately funded programs are in danger from recurring disasters. Federal reinsurance has been proposed for them, but might not come from an administration focused on cost cutting.

Advertisement

To keep customers and attract new ones, the National Flood Insurance Program, the largest provider of flood coverage, recently announced it would accept monthly payments as an alternative to a single yearly one. The authors of Project 2025, a governing blueprint created for the Trump administration, would like to see this taxpayer-subsidized insurance privatized. — Carl Smith

Taxes

As noted earlier, state budgets are already under considerable pressure this year. Nevertheless, there’s still a good amount of appetite for cutting taxes. But the ambitions of tax-cutters will likely be reduced from recent years, when nearly every state cut taxes.

As recently as November, Louisiana cut personal income taxes by more than $1 billion. Some governors, such as incoming Missouri Republican Mike Kehoe, are talking about eliminating income taxes altogether. Although revenues are projected to decline in Kentucky, further income tax cuts remain a priority for the legislature’s Republican majority. Last year, states including Idaho, Kansas and West Virginia passed property tax cuts. Property taxes are mostly a local matter, but states remain interested in providing relief with bills going up due to increased housing values.

All this activity comes at a time when revenue growth has slowed and significant tax legislation is expected at the federal level. President-elect Trump has proposed eliminating the $10,000 cap on state and local tax deductions imposed by the tax-cut package enacted in 2017. He wants to extend personal income tax cuts included in that bill, which would otherwise expire at the end of 2025, while offering more breaks for businesses. “That could lead to declines in corporate income tax revenues, particularly for the states that conform to the federal code,” says Lucy Dadayan of the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. “Potentially eliminating taxes on tips and Social Security can also have an impact on state tax revenues.”

Jonathan Williams, chief economist with the conservative American Legislative Exchange Council, opposes lifting the cap on state and local deductions, which he says forces the rest of the country to subsidize higher-tax jurisdictions. He favors the overall mission of extending the 2017 cuts, however. “State-level conformity with its expiring provisions, which broaden the income tax base and strengthen revenue for states, provided the ability for states to implement pro-growth tax relief in response, setting off this tax-cut revolution we’ve seen in states in recent years,” Williams says.

Advertisement

In states led by Democrats, lawmakers are considering tax hikes to help pay the bills, mostly on wealthy residents. Last month, outgoing Washington Gov. Jay Inslee prepared a budget that includes a new wealth tax to generate $10 billion over the next four years. Legislative leaders there say some sort of tax increase is likely, due to the state’s budget shortfall.

Taxes on wealth, as opposed to income, may face legal perils, but progressives around the country are still eyeing the strategy as a potential source of significant revenue. “For working people, they’re often taxed on the work that they do, and for wealthy people, they’re not very regularly taxed on the wealth that they hold,” says Jessie Ulibarri, co-executive director of the State Innovation Exchange, a consortium of progressive legislators. — Alan Greenblatt

Continue Reading

Finance

Robinhood named ‘Best Idea’ for 2025 by Bernstein team

Published

on

Robinhood named ‘Best Idea’ for 2025 by Bernstein team

Bernstein analysts named Robinhood Markets (HOOD) as the firm’s new “Best Idea” for 2025 as part of their coverage on global digital assets. Market Domination Overtime hosts Julie Hyman and Josh Lipton examine the broader analyst commentary around Robinhood’s stock.

To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime here.

This post was written by Luke Carberry Mogan.

Continue Reading

Finance

How to eliminate credit card debt: Finance expert weighs in on what steps you should take

Published

on

How to eliminate credit card debt: Finance expert weighs in on what steps you should take

January can be a tough time financially, especially if holiday spending leaves you with some debt. If you’re struggling financially following the holiday season, you’re not alone.

Eastgate resident, Atiana Anderson said she’s focusing on improving her financial fitness in 2025.

“My financial resolution this year is to save money. I’m hoping to save about 10 grand by the end of the year,” she said.

She said she plans to cut back on frivolous spending and pay off her credit card debt, but trying to build savings in today’s economy is no easy feat. Wilmington mother, Lindsay Clepper agrees.

“I’m a single mother, so I only have one income in the house, so it’s been really, really rough this year,” she said. “We’ve been in financial ruin. I’m just staying afloat.”

Advertisement

I went to financial wellness coach, Al Riddick to help find a solution. Here’s some of his advice for getting out of debt this year.

Start an emergency savings

Riddick said before you start paying down debt, you should set aside some money for emergencies.

“Hopefully people can set up an account where they can put at least $1,000 to the side,” he said. “Because something is always going to happen that’s going to impact cash flow that you don’t expect.”

Start with the smallest debt

Credit card debt can feel overwhelming. Regardless of interest rate, Riddick recommends paying down the debt with the smallest balance first.

“Because as human beings, we want to experience success as fast as possible, right? So, if you can attack that small debt, get rid of it as quickly as possible just by human nature, your self-esteem is going to go up,” Riddick said. “Your commitment to the process is going to go up as well, and the probability that you will consistently implement these behaviors is going to continue in the future.”

Advertisement

Keep track of your money

Riddick said it’s important to know how much money is coming in and out each month.

“A lot of people don’t even know what they get paid on a weekly or biweekly basis,” Riddick said. “Most people have no idea regarding how much their monthly expenses are because we don’t count money anymore. Everything is on direct deposit or automatic draft.”

Riddick said automatic payments do not mean you should ignore them. He said there’s no way to create an effective plan to get out of debt if you don’t understand where your money is going each month.

“When you implement a budget every month, you can almost see where you will be a year from now, five years from now, or even 10 years from now because it is really that simple,” Riddick said.

Once you determine your budget, you may decide the need for a secondary source of income. To better her finances this year, in addition to her current job, Lindsay Clepper said she’s considering enrolling in night school. “To start something else on the side, just to make the extra money to be able to get debt-free,” she said.

Advertisement

Pay your bill frequently

Riddick said you can take control of your finances by paying your credit card bill regularly.

“You know, there’s nothing wrong with paying your bill every week. You don’t have to wait, like, 30 days until the company sends you the bill,” Riddick said. “If you pay your bill every week, what that typically does, it heightens your level of awareness regarding what you’re doing with your money.”

When you’re paying more attention to your money, you start to notice trends or habits you may have otherwise missed.

“When you are paying more attention, more than likely, you’re like, wait a minute. I didn’t know I was spending that much money eating out or having food delivered to my home or paying this type of money on all these various subscription services,” he said. “But you know, at the end of the day, you are in control of every aspect of your financial life, but this is a power that only works when you unleash it.”

Plan for next year

Instead of repeating the cycle each year, Riddick said you should plan and save for the 2025 holiday season now.

Advertisement

“We know that on December 25, what’s going to happen, Christmas is coming, right?” he said.

He recommends setting up an automatic transfer from your checking to a savings account. He said for example, if you set aside $100 every month, you will have $1,200 by December set aside for holiday spending.

“Doing it that way is a lot easier than waiting around until November and then trying to come up with $1,200 that you don’t have, and that’s how people end up getting into debt,” he said. “If we know a certain event is coming up in the future, why not do yourself a favor and go ahead and plan in advance.”

Atiana Anderson had some words of encouragement for anyone experiencing credit card debt.

“Don’t be intimidated. Everything will work out for the best, even if you are struggling financially,” she said. “If you get a game plan, write it down in the notebook, and discuss it with financial planners, family members or an organization. Believe that you will get out of credit card debt or whatever situations that you have.”

Advertisement

“Don’t Waste Your Money” is a registered trademark of Scripps Media, Inc. (“Scripps”).

Follow John:

Follow Taylor:

For more consumer news and money saving advice, go to www.dontwasteyourmoney.com

More Don’t Waste Your Money news:

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending