Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘Thor: Love and Thunder’ Review: A God’s Comic Twilight

Published

on

‘Thor: Love and Thunder’ Review: A God’s Comic Twilight

Every now and then in “Thor: Love and Thunder,” the 92nd Marvel film to hit theaters this yr (OK, the third), the studio equipment hits pause, and the image opens a portal to a different dimension: Its star, Chris Hemsworth, embraces wholesale self-parody, a pair of large screaming goats gallop alongside a rainbow freeway and Russell Crowe flounces round in a flirty skirt and Shirley Temple curls. Because the film briefly slips right into a parallel realm of play and pleasure, you may really feel the director Taika Waititi having an excellent time — and it’s infectious.

That is the fourth “Thor” film in 11 years and the second that Waititi has directed, following “Thor: Ragnarok” (2017). That film was far and wide, however it was humorous (sufficient) and had a lightness that proved liberating for the collection and Hemsworth. “Love and Thunder” is sillier than any of its predecessors, and thinner. Rather a lot occurs in overstuffed Marvel Studios trend. However as a result of the collection has jettisoned lots of its earlier parts — its Shakespearean pretensions, meddlesome family members and, crucially, Thor’s godly grandeur — the brand new film roughly performs like a rescue mission with jokes, tears and smackdowns.

It begins with a pasty, near-unrecognizable Christian Bale, who, having been relieved of his DC Darkish Knight duties, has signed up with Marvel as a villain with the spoiler title of Gorr the God Butcher. Waititi rapidly sketches in Gorr’s background, giving it a tragic solid. Believing himself betrayed by the god he as soon as worshiped, Gorr is dedicated to destroying different deities. It’s probably wealthy storytelling terrain, notably given Thor’s stature and Marvel’s position as a recent mythmaker. However whereas Bale takes the position by the throat, as is his behavior, investing the character with frictional depth, Gorr proves disappointingly boring.

For probably the most half, Gorr merely offers Thor one other likelihood to play the hero, which Hemsworth does with a stellar deadpan and considerable suppleness. He’s all the time been enjoyable to look at within the position and never simply because, because the slavering camerawork likes to remind you, he appears awfully wonderful with or with out garments. Hemsworth is aware of how you can transfer, which is stunning given his muscled bulk, and is relaxed together with his magnificence. He’s additionally realized how you can deploy — and puncture — Thor’s inborn pomposity, though by the point the ultimate credit rolled in “Ragnarok” that haughtiness had was shtick. Thor continues to be a god, but in addition he’s now an important huge goof.

To that finish, Thor enters midfight on a battlefield washed in grayish crimson mild, preening and posing and showboating alongside characters from Marvel’s “Guardians of the Galaxy.” With Guardians (Chris Pratt, the raccoon voiced by Bradley Cooper, and so on.) on backup, Thor vanquishes the enemy together with his customary hyperbole — he strikes the bottom, reaches for the heavens, flips his hair — and a brand new hammer the scale of a backhoe shovel. He additionally destroys a temple that appears proper out of an airport present store. This synergistic foreplay isn’t fairly, and neither is the remainder of the film, however it pronounces Waititi’s sensibilities, his irreverence and style for kitsch.

Advertisement

From the beginning, the “Thor” collection has pushed and pulled at its title character, by turns enshrining and undercutting his supernatural id, elevating him up solely to deliver him crashing again right down to Earth. The films have, virtually to a fault, emphasised Thor’s frailties: He has daddy points, a sibling rivalry and romantic woes. Gods, they’re identical to us! Thor’s love life humanized him for good and unhealthy, although his romance with an astrophysicist — Natalie Portman’s Jane Foster — labored finest as ballast for the he-man motion. Jane wasn’t attention-grabbing, regardless of Portman’s febrile smiles, however, after sitting out the final film, she’s again.

Why the encore? Effectively, principally as a result of Waititi, who wrote the script with Jennifer Kaytin Robinson, doesn’t appear to know what else he can do with Thor. By the top of “Ragnarok,” the character had been repeatedly lower right down to measurement. He’d squabbled together with his brother and wittiest foil (Tom Hiddleston as Loki). His lengthy hair was chopped off and his kingdom annihilated, and gone too had been the heavyweights who had helped fill the story’s holes with their magnetism and character. Anthony Hopkins (Thor’s dad) exited, as did Cate Blanchett (sis). Thor fought, beloved and misplaced, after which he packed on the kilos and went to hold with the Avengers.

“Love and Thunder” revs up the “Thor” franchise once more with the standard quips and beats, programmatically timed blowouts, brand-extending particulars, a kidnapping and a welcome if underused Tessa Thompson. Her Valkyrie, alas, receives much less display time than Jane, who’s given a disaster in addition to particular powers, a blond blowout and muscle tissue that inflate and deflate like occasion balloons. Jane’s new abilities don’t do a lot for the story and skim as a dutiful nod to girls’s empowerment (thanks). Portman does what she will, but she’s so tightly wound that she by no means syncs up with the loosey-goosey rhythms the way in which Thompson and Hemsworth do.

Waititi’s playfulness buoys “Love and Thunder,” however the insistence on Thor’s likability, his decency and dude-ness, has turn out to be a artistic useless finish. The film has its sights, notably Hemsworth, Thompson and Crowe, whose Zeus vamps via a sequence with a butt-naked Thor and fainting minions. It’s a pleasant and cheerfully vulgar interlude, and critically, it reminds you of the sheer otherworldliness of those beings who — with their vanities, cruelties, deeds, mysteries and powers — flip actuality into fable and tales into goals. Like film stars, gods aren’t like us, which in fact is one cause we invented them.

Thor: Love and Thunder
Rated PG-13 for superhero violence. Working time: 2 hours 5 minutes. In theaters.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Arcadian (2024) – Movie Review

Published

on

Arcadian (2024) – Movie Review

Arcadian, 2024.

Directed by Benjamin Brewer.
Starring Nicolas Cage, Jaeden Martell, Maxwell Jenkins, Sadie Soverall, Samantha Coughlan, and Joel Gillman.

SYNOPSIS:

A father and his twin teenage sons fight to survive in a remote farmhouse at the end of the end of the world.

Advertisement

Finding a human story within a post-apocalyptic creature feature is typically a creative choice to appreciate. Director Benjamin Brewer’s Arcadian (from a screenplay by Michael Nilon) has a similarly intriguing concept. It focuses on how two twin teenage boys must set aside their differences and become a more cohesive survival unit following a life-threatening injury to their father, a quieter, more restrained Nicolas Cage. Played by Jaeden Martell and Maxwell Jenkins, the boys are at odds in the expected ways; one is more mature and crafty, the other headstrong and less concerned with duties in favor of visiting a nearby farmhouse to hang around his crush (Sadie Soverall), who has also yet to see much of the leveled and decayed world beyond her home.

It’s also not necessarily an issue that the filmmakers aren’t concerned with explaining much about this apocalypse or the monsters, choosing to focus on the human element and day-to-day routines, which primarily consist of scavenging during the day and locking themselves up at night in an isolated home. The family is a tightknit trio, but even with Nicolas Cage’s calm demeanor and patience as Paul, breaking up the bickering between Joseph and Thomas, it’s made clear that they would either completely unravel without him or come together stronger than ever to protect him. 

Despite the generally compelling setup and potentially complex character dynamics, Arcadian never finds much depth within any of that. As a story, it’s going through the motions and placing the brothers in other perilous situations that come across as contrived, as if the filmmakers don’t know what else to do. Even the friendship between Thomas and Charlotte feels more like a skeleton rather than something properly fleshed out. It plays out more like an obligatory love interest subplot instead of something substantially adding to the characters and the shaky sibling dynamic.

By the time Arcadian descends into a prolonged action-packed third act against agile, prehistoric-reminiscent beasts with elongated necks, quite literally chomping at the bit to devour human flesh, there is a degree of emotional investment into these characters, albeit a lingering sensation that, much like the preceding hour, there is something off and dull about all of this. 

It also has nothing to do with the gutsy decision to sideline Nicolas Cage for a sizable portion of Arcadian; that’s a subversively clever choice, but there isn’t enough on the page for the boys to elevate the material. As for the monster design, nothing is striking or unique here. However, even if there was something aesthetically nightmarish and exciting, the presentation is drowned in darkness to cover up mid-tier CGI most likely resulting from budget constraints.  Viewers are left clinging to a human story that is disappointingly shallow and generic, especially for a time and genre that has recently seen superior offerings.

Advertisement

Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ ★ / Movie: ★ ★ ★

Robert Kojder is a member of the Chicago Film Critics Association and the Critics Choice Association. He is also the Flickering Myth Reviews Editor. Check here for new reviews, follow my Twitter or Letterboxd, or email me at MetalGearSolid719@gmail.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embed/playlist

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Short Film Review: A Catholic Schoolgirl by Myra Angeline Soriaso

Published

on

Short Film Review: A Catholic Schoolgirl by Myra Angeline Soriaso

“Not everyone is meant for this life. It’s a huge commitment”

Myra Soriaso is a student filmmaker who found her knack for storytelling after discovering microcinema in 2018. In 2021, her first short documentary Panambi, co-created with her besties Jane and Katya, premiered internationally at Ji.hlava International Film Festival. She debuted as a fiction filmmaker in 2023 at Qcinema International Film Festival with “A Catholic Schoolgirl”, which won the QCShorts Gender Sensitivity Award.

The film begins setting the tone, with a black screen where we hear the sound of girls praying. The next shot focuses on the protagonist, Kaya, a young girl who is following the prayers of the nuns in an all-girls Catholic school, although she also seems deep in her thoughts while doing so. Another nun, Sister Agnes, works with her on her chanting, with the girl being evidently disappointed that her teacher will be leaving by the end of the semester.

Sister Agnes then introduces the girl to some other nuns, praising her singing voice and her overall performance in the school. The nuns are working in the kitchen and Kaya offers to help, with Sister Agnes showing how to slice mangoes this time. A cut finger results in a more intimate discussion, with Kaya asking about love and the lack of romance the particular path holds for those who pledge themselves to God. Sister Agnes opens up about herself in order to guide her student. One more ‘episode’ follows though.

Myra Angeline Soriaso shoots a film that deals with the concept of LGBT love within a catholic setting, in an effort to highlight both how difficult the particular path can be, and how teenagers can experience their newfound sentiments and their effort to become of the cloth. The combination works quite well, creating an atmosphere that is secretive, intimate and mysterious, with the voyeuristic aspect in particular working well in that regard.

Advertisement

Considered that the short essentially deals with temptation, having a model such as Sharon Idone playing Sister Agnes definitely hits the spot, with her presence justifying what Kaya feels. The scene between the two close to the end brings the whole thing down to reality, while another one, with the jam on the report card adds a very meaningful and visually impressive metaphor about what happened, and what will probably happen in Kaya’s future.

Check also this video

Lastly, that the ‘confession’ takes place in a space where another kind of confession is supposed to happen, adds a very appealing note to the movie, which is both intelligent and quite smart. Some scenes could have been handled a bit better regarding what is happening, but overall, the context here is rich and well-presented.

Ora Palencia as Kaya highlights her sentiments, eagerness, and inner turmoil in eloquent fashion, even if her role is quite laconic. Martika Ramirez Escobar captures all the aforementioned with artistry, with the voyeuristic scene being the apogee of her work. Maria Estela Paiso’s editing results in a mid-tempo that works well for the style of narrative here, allowing a full story to unfold in less than 16 minutes.

“A Catholic Schoolgirl” is another excellent short film from the Philippines, which highlights that we are bound to see even more interesting things from the country in the following years.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Fresh Kills (2024) – Movie Review

Published

on

Fresh Kills (2024) – Movie Review

Fresh Kills, 2024.

Written and Directed by Jennifer Esposito.
Starring Emily Bader, Odessa A’zion, Jennifer Esposito, Domenick Lombardozzi, Annabella Sciorra, Nicholas Cirillo, Ava DeMary, Stelio Savante, Franco Maicas, David Iacono, Anastasia Veronica Lee, Taylor Madeline Hand, Maya Moravec, Nicole Ehinger, Luciana VanDette, Amanda Corday, Annie Pisapia, Camryn Adele Portagallo, Colleen Kelly, Beatrice Pelliccia, Charlie Reina, and Bettina Skye.

SYNOPSIS:

Follows the story of the loyal women of an organized crime family that dominated some of the boroughs of New York City in the late 20th century.

Advertisement

A film for anyone who wonders about the specifics of what goes on in the lives of the mothers, daughters, and granddaughters part of a mobster family household, writer/director/producer/star Jennifer Esposito’s Fresh Kills, for all its clunky pacing and overreaching ambition, is fresh and packs a cumulative punch about this inescapable lifestyle.

Spanning several points in time across the 1980s and 1990s while primarily fixated on tightknit sisters Rose and Connie, Fresh Kills homes in on how these girls, especially as they grow up, couldn’t be any more different from one another, especially when it comes to the privilege of wealth and the expectations of being born into a family dynamic where the women stay at home while the men are involved in the Staten Island Mafia.

Played by Anastasia Veronica Lee and Taylor Madeline Hand as young girls before turning things over to Emily Bader and Odessa A’zion upon growing up, the former, Rose, is the quiet one (you would be forgiven if you assumed she was mute during the first 15 minutes or so) whereas Connie is upbeat and playful. Connie is seen encouraging Rose to “fly” by spreading apart her hands while being boosted on top of her knees. It’s a silly game they play in front of their new home, still innocent of what their father, Joe Larusso (Domenick Lombardozzi), does for a living. Moments later, an unnerving dialogue exchange is overheard in the garage, somewhat clueing them int to different extents. Little do the girls know, it seems no women born into this type of toxic family dynamic truly get to fly, at least independently.

Then there is the matriarch Francine (Jennifer Esposito), aware and horrified by much of her husband’s actions. At one point, in hysterics, she exclaims that she needs to get away. Yet, much like Connie when she ages, she sticks up for this spoiled lifestyle, whether from fashion, a spacious home or simply being blessed with a healthy family. Once upon a time, she did dream of being something more, apparently approached to get into modeling, yet instead ended up around the arm of Joe. Naturally, Connie becomes her favorite since she is the one to embrace and carry on the more traditional roles, whereas Rose finds herself talked down to over having goals beyond marriage and motherhood.

There is the instinct to label Francine a bad mother for trying to enforce such a status quo, and even the screenplay from Jennifer Esposito never fully gets around fleshing out all of the multidimensional characters; she comes across as a complex figure. She is someone who gave up on her dreams and has not chosen to actively go against a daughter trying to make something of herself (Rose is interested in beauty just like her mother was) and escapes something that she knows has been dysfunctional, hostile, unhealthy, and traumatic for quite some time.

Advertisement

The performances from Emily Bader and Odessa A’zion are also rich, going beyond playing two characters gradually transitioning into opposites. Connie is played with such tornado-like ferocity, preaching family first and asserting that she has made the right choice in getting married and having a child, one suspects that she is trying to convince herself just as much as she is verbally tearing her sister down. Meanwhile, Rose gradually tries to come out of her shell and embark on a different path, but at every turn, she is devastatingly and tragically reminded of what she has been born into and might never escape. Naturally, Domenick Lombardozzi is wisely kept off to the side (this is not a mobster movie about the crimes themselves), but is also part of an emotional scene with Rose that ends on such a powerful note you can’t help but pity him. It’s a vicious, towering toxic masculinity takedown.

As mentioned, the pacing in Fresh Kills is sometimes off, with jumps forward in time frustratingly undercutting other developing character dynamics. One also wishes Jennifer Esposito felt more confident as a filmmaker, doing away with unnecessary needle-drops to heighten the importance of certain moments. However, she does find cohesive, full-throttle momentum for her passion project in its third act, which is riveting, heartbreaking, and empowering, retroactively shading in more depth to what comes before.  

Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ ★ ★ / Movie: ★ ★ ★ ★

Robert Kojder is a member of the Chicago Film Critics Association and the Critics Choice Association. He is also the Flickering Myth Reviews Editor. Check here for new reviews, follow my Twitter or Letterboxd, or email me at MetalGearSolid719@gmail.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embed/playlist

Advertisement

 

Continue Reading

Trending