Connect with us

Movie Reviews

SINNERS Review

Published

on

SINNERS Review
(PaPaPa, PCPC, RHRH, OO, C, B, LLL, VVV, SS, AA, D, M):

Dominant Worldview and Other Worldview Content/Elements:

Very strong mixed worldview with politically correct liberal/leftist revisionist history making false accusations against white people to build racial animosity, some strong occult elements featuring vampires and rural superstitions, mitigated slightly by positive Christian references to sacrifice, to a possible heavenly afterlife, and to a gospel song, “This Little Light of Mine,” which is based on something Jesus says in the Bible;

Foul Language:

At least 82 obscenities (including at least 25 “f” words), one profanity using the name of Jesus, six GD profanities, and four light exclamatory profanities;

Advertisement

Violence:

Extremely bloody violence involves vampire attacks, and people fighting vampires to survive;

Sex:

Briefly depicted fornication scene, a briefly depicted adulterous sex scene that turns out to be a vampire attack from the woman (she emerges with blood on her face and down her front and the man is dead), a married woman flirts with her ex-lover when he returns home after years away, and some suggestive sultry dancing;

Nudity:

Advertisement

No nudity, but some women are wearing slinky low-cut dresses at a rural nightclub;

Alcohol Use:

Lots of alcohol use and some drunkenness and one character seems to be an alcoholic;

Smoking and/or Drug Use and Abuse:

Smoking; and,

Advertisement

Miscellaneous Immorality:

Vampires try to use deceit to sneak into rural nightclub, and two brothers earned their fortune working as gangsters for Al Capone.

SINNERS turns out to be a bloody vampire movie about two black brothers in rural Mississippi in 1932 who, after earning lots of money working for Al Capone in Chicago, find their new juke joint invaded by three white vampires singing Irish folk ballads who are trying to snag the soul of their cousin, a blues player with a great future. SINNERS is a metaphorical, racist horror movie claiming that white people always steal black folk music, with lots of strong foul language, bloody violence and two sex scenes.

Michael B. Jordan stars in the movie as two twin brothers, Smoke and Stack. The brothers left their rural town to serve in World War I, then lived in Chicago, where they became part of Al Capone’s alcohol bootlegging outfit. They’ve returned home in 1932 to start a juke joint. They buy a large barn and some land from a white businessman. They also recruit their young cousin, Sammie, an amazing blues guitarist, to play at their place.

With Sammy in tow, Stack also recruits Delta Slim, an alcoholic harmonica player. Meanwhile, Smoke visits an old girlfriend, Annie, and the gravesite of their son who died in childbirth.

Advertisement

That night, the grand opening of the juke joint is going extremely well, with drinking and lots of music. However, the revelry gets interrupted by three white Southern vampires singing Irish folk ballads and asking to be invited into the place. Violent chaos ensues.

SINNERS is a weird genre smashup. It starts off as a rural drama about black empowerment in the Segregationist South, with a subplot about the local Asian grocer who’s become part of the community. Then, it turns into a crazy horror movie about white vampires.

The one thread that runs through both is the movie’s musical theme, which focuses on Sammie. In the movie’s beginning, Sammie’s father, admonishes him before the father’s church congregation for opening himself up to the Devil for singing the blues. However, during the movie’s vampire section, the movie’s musical premise shifts from the condition of Sammie’s soul to a political premise about white people, represented by the singing white vampires, appropriating and even stealing black people’s music. For example, at one point, the white leader of the vampires tells the people inside the juke joint that, if they give Sammie to them, they will let the other people go free. Also, the movie reveals that, when the vampires take a victim, they absorb the victim’s memories, knowledge and abilities.

Ultimately, therefore, SINNERS is a metaphorical story about the liberal/leftist claim that white people immorally appropriated or stole black people’s music to get rich. In this revisionist history, white people are always stealing black folk music, such as ragtime, blues and jazz. Rock and Roll is actually just a marketing term, but white rock singers and bands, from Elvis Presley and the Rolling Stones to Led Zeppelin and Eric Clapton, are particularly accused of stealing black rhythm and blues, aka R&B. Writer/Director Ryan Coogler of SINNERS seems to be promoting this claim with this movie.

However, this claim is based on some major lies. First of all, for example, rock music is actually a combination of different kinds of folk music, not only black blues and R&B but also country blues, bluegrass music, country and western music, Elizabethan and English musical harmonies and structures, and Celtic folk music. There’s a good argument, in fact, that the first recorded rock song was actually “Move It On Over” by country music star Hank Williams in 1947. Also, the famous black singer Chuck Berry, often considered the Father of Rock and Roll, had his first big hit in 1955 with “Maybelline,” but the tune he used is from a western swing song! Elvis Presley was discovered by the founder of Sun Records, Sam Phillips, in 1954, but Sam’s personal goal with his record company was to unite popular white music and popular black music. So, when Elvis took the country by storm in 1955 and 1956, it opened the door to many black artists singing blues, R&B and pop songs, getting recording deals and seeing their songs hit the top crossover charts too instead of just being confined to black communities. Also, many later rock artists like the Rolling Stones and Eric Clapton publicly acknowledged their debt to black R&B and blues artists like Muddy Water and BB King. It should also be noted that “country rock” and “Southern Rock” continue to be among the most popular kinds of rock music. Many male artists on the country charts today sing in that style. Finally, regarding earlier black folk music like ragtime, which developed into jazz, it should be noted that ragtime was popularized in the 1890s by a white vaudeville artist named Ben Harney. Now, Harney was a minstrel performer and often performed in blackface. However, he died destitute when ragtime music faded, even though he wrote many of his own ragtime songs with another man. The most famous black ragtime artist was, of course, Scott Joplin, but he also died destitute in 1917 after suffering the effects of a sexually transmitted disease contracted in 1903 or so and being committed to a mental institution. Black ragtime artists like Irving Jones and W. C. Handy fared better, however. Also, the most influential jazz concert was performed by white artist Benny Goodman and his band at Carnegie Hall in 1938. That concert helped make jazz popular throughout the whole United States. So, it helped both white and black jazz artists. Finally, if you go back to the apparent origins of ragtime music, the pre-slavery South, you’ll find out that plantation slaves held dance events called “rags.” The dances included reels, jigs and Scottish folk dances, which are primarily European, but were probably at least partly filled with African dances and sounds. However, the instruments used in these dances consisted of a banjo and a fiddle. All that said, ragtime is not considered a purely black music but a combination of African music and classical European music, with a Spanish tango rhythm sometimes added.

Advertisement

So, there’s no massive “stealing” happening here. Just an often beautiful and wonderful combination of cultural integration, developed in a capitalist, free market system that benefitted many people of different ethnicities.

Aside from its racist historical revisionism, SINNERS also has lots of strong foul language and lots of extreme bloody violence. It also has a depicted fornication scene and a depicted adulterous sex scene, plus some suggestive dancing.

However, one scene at the end of SINNERS acknowledges some kind of heavenly afterlife when a dying Smoke has a vision of his dead girlfriend reunited with their baby son who died in childbirth. Also, a post-credit scene shows Sammie singing the Christian hymn, “This Little Light of Mine,” a song that uses something that Jesus said in the New Testament. Also, one character sacrifices his life and soul to save two other people. So, the movie’s politically correct paganism is slightly mitigated by light Christan, biblical content.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Letterboxd’s most eager reviewers are changing cinema etiquette: ‘I was excited to pull out my phone’

Published

on

Letterboxd’s most eager reviewers are changing cinema etiquette: ‘I was excited to pull out my phone’

I completely turn my phone off when I go to the movies. Not just on silent – all the way off. I say this not because I think that I’m better than you, or that by doing so the ghost of Billy Wilder will come back to shake my hand. I consider it one of life’s little luxuries: for at least an hour and 45 minutes, I am entirely unreachable. I keep my phone off for the duration of the credits, too. It feels decadent to stay put as my fellow moviegoers slowly filter out, illuminated only by rolling text.

And, lately, the glow of the Letterboxd app.

Over 26 million people use Letterboxd, a movie-cataloguing app. Like the Criterion Collection or A24, it has become industry shorthand for a certain type of tastemaker who hypes new releases and delights in rediscovering old classics. Users rate and review movies, and the funniest or most illuminating critiques rise to the top of the page, incentivizing cinephiles to put in some effort.

On a recent trip to the movies, the credits had barely started before the man in front of me began typing his review. A few seats over, a couple sat, heads down, jotting down their respective thoughts.

Advertisement

The late film-maker David Lynch had a piece of advice: write down every great idea the exact moment that it comes. If you don’t, it could slip your mind, and, as he put it: “If you forget a good idea, you want to commit suicide.” Lynch was speaking to aspiring film-makers, but the same ethos applies to Letterboxd.

Josh Stern, a 20-year-old student in New York, always writes his reviews from his movie seat.

“If I don’t get my thoughts out quickly once the movie ends, my reviews are much less coherent and articulate,” he said. “It takes some time. I’m pretty slow, and my girlfriend doesn’t like it.”

Stern goes to the movies a lot – 182 times last year – and is on a first-name basis with the theater employees, who sometimes have to kick him out so they can start cleaning the aisles. He thinks it’s fair game to milk the credits: “When you pay for a movie ticket, credits are a part of the movie.”

Letterboxd’s most enthusiastic supporters credit the app with reviving excitement around a battered film industry, where productions are down and unemployment is up. (Letterboxd also boasts the kind of demographics brands covet – its highest cohort of users is between the ages of 18 and 24, followed by 25 to 35.)

Advertisement

Hype begets hype; eagerly awaited movies see a flurry of activity on Letterboxd immediately after the first screenings. The most-liked review of Emerald Fennell’s divisive Wuthering Heights – “emily brontë died of tuberculosis 177 years ago yet this adaptation is still the worst thing that has ever happened to her” – has more thank 50,000 double taps. The Moment, Charli xcx’s fictionalized retelling of Brat summer, produced this comparison to tabloid enemy Taylor Swift’s concert film: “eras tour documentary found dead.”

“It’s a little bit of an addiction,” said Ben Glidden, a 33-year-old New Yorker who works in marketing for women’s sports. He also likes to write reviews during the credits. “Reflecting on what you just saw, immediately after you saw it, helps with the artistic experience. It helps you grasp the key messages of a film. If it makes you feel like a warm hug, that’s not necessarily something you remember five hours down the line.”

Glidden feels most compelled to review a film if it was very good – or very bad. Case in point: he recently sat through the Chris Pratt sci-fi vehicle Mercy. “I was actually so offended by how egregiously bad it was, that I was excited to pull out my phone and give it a half-star review,” he said. (Glidden’s a tougher critic than the Guardian’s film critic Pete Bradshaw, who gave the film three stars, calling it, “ingenious and watchable stuff”.)

Dakota Chester, a 28-year-old New Yorker who works in social media, saw Arco, the Oscar-nominated animated fantasy film, at an Upper West Side theater and stuck around to write the review (“it got five stars”). He’s clocked worse behavior: people taking out their phones to Letterboxd the movie they are currently watching. “That gets on my nerves,” he said.

One of film’s most enduring urban legends recounts a screening of the Lumiere brothers’ 1896 silent short that showed a train pulling into a station. Cinema was in its infancy and – according to this debunked rumor – the shot of a locomotive heading straight toward the camera shocked the crowd so much that people ran away screaming.

Advertisement

A hundred-and-thirty years later, cinema etiquette remains just as bad. No one knows how to act in public any more, especially when the lights go down: viewers take pictures of the screen, bring in smelly food, and, as was the case during Barbenheimer summer, sometimes engage in all-out brawls.

Some have taken to social media to debate the appropriateness of Letterboxding during credits. When one TikTok user posted about her “quiet little moment” writing a review in an AMC theater after the credits ended, movie theater employees chimed in. “Pls do this in your car, as soon as the credits stop rolling we have to clean in there or we get way behind in our scheduled cleans,” one wrote. “Take this to the lobby,” another added.

Courtney Mayhew, a representative for Letterboxd, wrote in a statement: “Anecdotally, we’ve heard from members who’ve struck up conversations after noticing someone nearby on the app, sometimes leading to ongoing friendships or just a great chat about what they’ve just watched. That impulse to get your thoughts down while they’re fresh is something we understand – it’s part of the ritual for many people … And obviously, phones out during the actual film is still a cardinal sin – we’re not monsters.”

Other Letterboxd users like to let a film marinate before posting. Irene Vasquez is a 22-year-old film student who joined Letterboxd in 2018 and credits the app for helping her take movies more seriously.

Advertisement

“As I’ve seen it get more popular, it’s gamified movies for people, and it feels like everyone’s in competition to watch as many movies as possible,” she said. “I get frustrated with all the people who pull out their phones immediately to rate films, because I really value sitting with a movie and letting it sink in. I treasure that experience.”

Professional critics used to be arbiters of taste, but in a fractured, post-Gene Siskel or Pauline Kael media ecosystem, Letterboxd reviews probably do more to get young people talking to each other about films than any New York Times writeup could. Raphael Martinez, 43, who manages and programs for a movie theater in Chicago that caters to a “pretty hardcore” art-house crowd, is heartened by the app’s most immediate reviewers. “Within 20 minutes of the movie ending, we have a handful of advertisements on Letterboxd for the movie,” he said. “It helps get people to the theater and gauges community reaction to what we show.”

In the 2010s, Marvel movies conditioned millennials to stay for post-credit scenes offering breadcrumbs or plot reveals for future films in the universe. Martinez found that much more annoying than the cinephiles who stay to get their thoughts down. “People weren’t doing anything, they would just wait around,” he said. “Now, people are hanging out, engaging, and it’s more of a vibe, as opposed to simply consuming.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die Movie Review (Spoiler-Free) > Fandom Spotlite

Published

on

Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die Movie Review (Spoiler-Free) > Fandom Spotlite

Claiming to be from the future, a man takes hostages at a Los Angeles diner to recruit unlikely heroes to help him save the world. The newest movie from director Gore Verbinski is not only one of the best of the year so far, but it is also one of the most fun you will have in a theatre in recent memory. 

There is honestly so much to say about this movie, but saying too much would definitely spoil things, and this is the type of movie you want to go in blind if you could. Having said that, this is going to be a shorter review. Still, there are plenty of things to acknowledge about this one.  We have seen so many movies showing us a future where technology takes over the world. That is nothing new. However, the well-written script, amazing cast of characters, and the current topic of AI really set this film apart from the rest. 

Sam Rockwell is excellent as the lead character from the future looking for a group of civilians to help save the world. The action starts right away as we realize that this guy has tried to save the world from AI several times with a different group each time, and failing each time. He has yet to find the perfect combination of help. Our cast of characters this time around includes  Michael Peña, Zazie Beetz, Juno Temple, and Haley Lu Richardson. Everyone is so good in their roles, specifically Richardson and Temple, proving that they can handle the serious moments as well as the more comedic ones. 

How Does it Make You Feel?

There are several different ways to review or critique a movie. Some movies get just about everything right from a technical angle, but still won’t please folks. Some movies get everything wrong from a technical aspect, and it will be someone’s favorite thing. When I review films, I try to be 50/50 to give them a fair chance. Is the movie well-made, and does it leave me feeling anything? While many movies lean more one way than the other, Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die manages to please on all accounts. 

Advertisement

The movie is shot well with tons of amazing set pieces. The characters are likeable and developed enough that you truly care about them, and the script is so original that it truly left me not knowing where the movie was going next. Verbinski had previously directed Pirates of the Caribbean and The Ring: two completely different movies and tones, but both very successful. Verbinski really shows his range in this new movie. He manages to capture both tones of horror and comedy in this film perfectly while sprinkling in a few other ones as well. 

The movie is so successful at making you laugh one moment, then leaving you uncomfortable and on the edge of your seat in the next. I will not spoil anything, but there are a couple of scenes in this movie that, if they were in another film, they just wouldn’t work. They are either too weird or too controversial. Current topics in real life are played for satire in this film, and these scenes pack a punch for sure. 

The movie is also very smart in how it tackles the idea of AI. The goal of this movie isn’t to completely erase technology or the use of AI. The movie is smart enough to know that AI is already here to stay, whether people like it or not. The heroes are not here to destroy it, but rather find a way to control it responsibly so that we have a world where people can be aware of what is reality and what isn’t. This was such an intelligent and fascinating way to handle things.

Overall

Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die is the best movie I have seen so far this year and probably the most entertained I have been at the movies in some time. It is an original Sci Fi comedy that has a lot to say without being preachy. It is truly a trip that feels like an old-school adventure film full of rich characters and excitement. It is truly a shame that this movie hasn’t received more screenings, but if there is one local to you, you owe it to yourself to check it out. 

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Gore Galore: Stuart Ortiz’s ‘STRANGE HARVEST’ (2024) – Movie Review – PopHorror

Published

on

Gore Galore: Stuart Ortiz’s ‘STRANGE HARVEST’ (2024) – Movie Review – PopHorror

I happen to find detective shows boring; they just never thrilled me. I have long grown apart from it, but as a kid, I studied a lot about different serial killers. None of it fit my style of seeing real crime scene photos that don’t hold back. With that in mind, Strange Harvest is several stories in one.

Let’s get into the review.

Synopsis

Detectives are thrust into a chilling hunt for “Mr. Shiny”-a sadistic serial killer from the past whose return marks the beginning of a new wave of grotesque, otherworldly crimes tied to a dark cosmic force.

With FX that would impress even Tom Savini himself, the film really grew on me. At first, I was unimpressed, thinking it was the usual cops and robbers type movie. However, the film quickly grabbed my attention. From the first few minutes, I was really excited to watch. The very first crime scene photos were life-changing in a movie or show quite like this.  Strange Harvest became even better as we got further into the film. Besides the dead bodies, the film really did make me feel as if this were a true story. The realism caught me off guard, and oftentimes, I found something to trigger me.

Though there were some really uncomfortanle scenes that broke the unwritten horror rules. The film quickly sucked me back in, however. The entire premise could easily happen to anyone; we already know the big names of serial killer history, but not the ones, such as this, that fly under the radar. They happen every day, somewhere in the world. So we already know the evil minds still exist today. Strange Harvest actually spooked me quite a bit. It was a good thing I watched it with the lights on, because some parts of the movie made me sleep with one eye open, watching the window all night.

Advertisement

The last film that got into my head was the first Paranormal Activity. Strange Harvest not only made me paranoid, but I was also afraid for days. Strange Harvest was one step away from intrusive thoughts; however, the film impressed me with fear. This wasn’t some heavy-footed steps; this was realism, and normally I hate those types of films. It was made for you to feel uncomfortable, but it also doesn’t blur the line between realism and fantasy.

In The End

In the end, I really enjoyed the film. It gave me a new view on detective-related shows and films. Strange Harvest is going into my list of movies in rotation when I work and need a great background noise; a perception that I loved this, but not too many others. I know there are some movies with masked villains chasing someone around with an array of tools and tricks. I easily recommend this film, which you can find on Hulu.

Heed my warning, however, because you are about to enter a new world. A world that should stick to the horror genre forever. Maybe I am hyping it up just a tad, but it doesn’t keep me from being a fan.

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending