Connect with us

Movie Reviews

SINNERS Review

Published

on

SINNERS Review
(PaPaPa, PCPC, RHRH, OO, C, B, LLL, VVV, SS, AA, D, M):

Dominant Worldview and Other Worldview Content/Elements:

Very strong mixed worldview with politically correct liberal/leftist revisionist history making false accusations against white people to build racial animosity, some strong occult elements featuring vampires and rural superstitions, mitigated slightly by positive Christian references to sacrifice, to a possible heavenly afterlife, and to a gospel song, “This Little Light of Mine,” which is based on something Jesus says in the Bible;

Foul Language:

At least 82 obscenities (including at least 25 “f” words), one profanity using the name of Jesus, six GD profanities, and four light exclamatory profanities;

Advertisement

Violence:

Extremely bloody violence involves vampire attacks, and people fighting vampires to survive;

Sex:

Briefly depicted fornication scene, a briefly depicted adulterous sex scene that turns out to be a vampire attack from the woman (she emerges with blood on her face and down her front and the man is dead), a married woman flirts with her ex-lover when he returns home after years away, and some suggestive sultry dancing;

Nudity:

Advertisement

No nudity, but some women are wearing slinky low-cut dresses at a rural nightclub;

Alcohol Use:

Lots of alcohol use and some drunkenness and one character seems to be an alcoholic;

Smoking and/or Drug Use and Abuse:

Smoking; and,

Advertisement

Miscellaneous Immorality:

Vampires try to use deceit to sneak into rural nightclub, and two brothers earned their fortune working as gangsters for Al Capone.

SINNERS turns out to be a bloody vampire movie about two black brothers in rural Mississippi in 1932 who, after earning lots of money working for Al Capone in Chicago, find their new juke joint invaded by three white vampires singing Irish folk ballads who are trying to snag the soul of their cousin, a blues player with a great future. SINNERS is a metaphorical, racist horror movie claiming that white people always steal black folk music, with lots of strong foul language, bloody violence and two sex scenes.

Michael B. Jordan stars in the movie as two twin brothers, Smoke and Stack. The brothers left their rural town to serve in World War I, then lived in Chicago, where they became part of Al Capone’s alcohol bootlegging outfit. They’ve returned home in 1932 to start a juke joint. They buy a large barn and some land from a white businessman. They also recruit their young cousin, Sammie, an amazing blues guitarist, to play at their place.

With Sammy in tow, Stack also recruits Delta Slim, an alcoholic harmonica player. Meanwhile, Smoke visits an old girlfriend, Annie, and the gravesite of their son who died in childbirth.

Advertisement

That night, the grand opening of the juke joint is going extremely well, with drinking and lots of music. However, the revelry gets interrupted by three white Southern vampires singing Irish folk ballads and asking to be invited into the place. Violent chaos ensues.

SINNERS is a weird genre smashup. It starts off as a rural drama about black empowerment in the Segregationist South, with a subplot about the local Asian grocer who’s become part of the community. Then, it turns into a crazy horror movie about white vampires.

The one thread that runs through both is the movie’s musical theme, which focuses on Sammie. In the movie’s beginning, Sammie’s father, admonishes him before the father’s church congregation for opening himself up to the Devil for singing the blues. However, during the movie’s vampire section, the movie’s musical premise shifts from the condition of Sammie’s soul to a political premise about white people, represented by the singing white vampires, appropriating and even stealing black people’s music. For example, at one point, the white leader of the vampires tells the people inside the juke joint that, if they give Sammie to them, they will let the other people go free. Also, the movie reveals that, when the vampires take a victim, they absorb the victim’s memories, knowledge and abilities.

Ultimately, therefore, SINNERS is a metaphorical story about the liberal/leftist claim that white people immorally appropriated or stole black people’s music to get rich. In this revisionist history, white people are always stealing black folk music, such as ragtime, blues and jazz. Rock and Roll is actually just a marketing term, but white rock singers and bands, from Elvis Presley and the Rolling Stones to Led Zeppelin and Eric Clapton, are particularly accused of stealing black rhythm and blues, aka R&B. Writer/Director Ryan Coogler of SINNERS seems to be promoting this claim with this movie.

However, this claim is based on some major lies. First of all, for example, rock music is actually a combination of different kinds of folk music, not only black blues and R&B but also country blues, bluegrass music, country and western music, Elizabethan and English musical harmonies and structures, and Celtic folk music. There’s a good argument, in fact, that the first recorded rock song was actually “Move It On Over” by country music star Hank Williams in 1947. Also, the famous black singer Chuck Berry, often considered the Father of Rock and Roll, had his first big hit in 1955 with “Maybelline,” but the tune he used is from a western swing song! Elvis Presley was discovered by the founder of Sun Records, Sam Phillips, in 1954, but Sam’s personal goal with his record company was to unite popular white music and popular black music. So, when Elvis took the country by storm in 1955 and 1956, it opened the door to many black artists singing blues, R&B and pop songs, getting recording deals and seeing their songs hit the top crossover charts too instead of just being confined to black communities. Also, many later rock artists like the Rolling Stones and Eric Clapton publicly acknowledged their debt to black R&B and blues artists like Muddy Water and BB King. It should also be noted that “country rock” and “Southern Rock” continue to be among the most popular kinds of rock music. Many male artists on the country charts today sing in that style. Finally, regarding earlier black folk music like ragtime, which developed into jazz, it should be noted that ragtime was popularized in the 1890s by a white vaudeville artist named Ben Harney. Now, Harney was a minstrel performer and often performed in blackface. However, he died destitute when ragtime music faded, even though he wrote many of his own ragtime songs with another man. The most famous black ragtime artist was, of course, Scott Joplin, but he also died destitute in 1917 after suffering the effects of a sexually transmitted disease contracted in 1903 or so and being committed to a mental institution. Black ragtime artists like Irving Jones and W. C. Handy fared better, however. Also, the most influential jazz concert was performed by white artist Benny Goodman and his band at Carnegie Hall in 1938. That concert helped make jazz popular throughout the whole United States. So, it helped both white and black jazz artists. Finally, if you go back to the apparent origins of ragtime music, the pre-slavery South, you’ll find out that plantation slaves held dance events called “rags.” The dances included reels, jigs and Scottish folk dances, which are primarily European, but were probably at least partly filled with African dances and sounds. However, the instruments used in these dances consisted of a banjo and a fiddle. All that said, ragtime is not considered a purely black music but a combination of African music and classical European music, with a Spanish tango rhythm sometimes added.

Advertisement

So, there’s no massive “stealing” happening here. Just an often beautiful and wonderful combination of cultural integration, developed in a capitalist, free market system that benefitted many people of different ethnicities.

Aside from its racist historical revisionism, SINNERS also has lots of strong foul language and lots of extreme bloody violence. It also has a depicted fornication scene and a depicted adulterous sex scene, plus some suggestive dancing.

However, one scene at the end of SINNERS acknowledges some kind of heavenly afterlife when a dying Smoke has a vision of his dead girlfriend reunited with their baby son who died in childbirth. Also, a post-credit scene shows Sammie singing the Christian hymn, “This Little Light of Mine,” a song that uses something that Jesus said in the New Testament. Also, one character sacrifices his life and soul to save two other people. So, the movie’s politically correct paganism is slightly mitigated by light Christan, biblical content.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Aamar Boss Movie Review: A film about the elderly that has its heart in the right place

Published

on

Aamar Boss Movie Review: A film about the elderly that has its heart in the right place

India’s ageing population is steadily growing, and as joint families fragment and urban lives grow busier, the emotional needs of the elderly are often sidelined. Nandita Roy and Shiboprosad Mukherjee – known for their sensitive, socially aware films like Bela Seshe and Posto – tackle this shifting reality in their latest, Aamar Boss. The result is heartfelt and engaging, though occasionally uneven.
The title Aamar Boss cleverly captures the film’s essence – a role reversal where an ageing mother asserts her independence, not just as a parent, but as a person with purpose. This duality of affection and quiet rebellion sets the tone.
The story begins with Shubhra (Rakhee Gulzar), a widowed, retired nurse with too much time and too little to do. Her son Animesh (Shiboprosad Mukherjee), busy with his publishing job, struggles to be present despite his love for her. Seeking purpose, Shubhra starts interning at his office – only to dream bigger. She launches a startup to empower other seniors, stirring both admiration and conflict at home.
The first half unfolds with charm and warmth, bolstered by crisp cinematography. A standout moment features a sunset over the city skyline – a quiet, poignant exchange between mother and son that speaks volumes. However, the second half loses momentum. Comic relief, particularly from Sabitri Chatterjee, offers some sparkle but stretches a bit long. The narrative rushes key developments, leaving certain arcs underexplored. A few forced romantic subplots – and forgettable songs – distract from the core story.
Rakhee’s return is the film’s biggest win. She commands the screen with grace; her expressive silences are deeply moving. Her scenes with Shiboprosad – filled with unspoken tension and mutual respect – are some of the film’s best. While Shiboprosad is solid as the pragmatic son, his romantic track doesn’t quite land. Gourab Chatterjee and Sauraseni Maitra add youthful energy, and the supporting cast – Shruti Das, Avery Singha Roy, Uma Banerjee, and Aishwarya Sen – shine in moments of genuine camaraderie, particularly among the women.
Aamar Boss aligns well with the Roy-Mukherjee filmography. Just as Bela Seshe explored late-life love and Posto redefined parenting roles, this film asks: What does relevance mean in old age? It suggests that retirement can be a beginning, not an end. Yet, the storytelling occasionally feels crowded – multiple subplots compete for attention, diluting the impact.
Despite its flaws, Aamar Boss resonates. It’s a timely reminder that caregiving is not just about comfort, but about respect, agency, and space. Whether you’re part of the sandwich generation or an older viewer seeking representation, the film offers moments of recognition – and quiet power.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Padakkalam movie review: A college supernatural flick that’s not the fantasy comedy it wants to be

Published

on

Padakkalam movie review: A college supernatural flick that’s not the fantasy comedy it wants to be

May 10, 2025 11:30 AM IST

Padakkalam movie review: It combines college life with supernatural elements as Jithin and friends suspect a professor’s strange behavior. 

Padakkalam Movie Review
Cast: Sandeep Pradeep, Suraj Venjaramoodu, Sharafudheen
Director: Manu Swaraj
Stars: ★★

Whenever a movie is set on a college campus with a group of friends and some professors as the key players, you can expect that there will be a lot of laughs, some action and perhaps, mystery as well. Padakkalam, helmed by debutant director Manu Swaraj, aims to be just that except that it is meshed with a supernatural element, a la Indiana Jones and the desi ‘parakaya pravesha’ (body swapping).

Padakkalam movie review: Despite engaging performances, particularly from Suraj Venjaramoodu and Sharafudheen, the film’s weak writing and underdeveloped female characters hinder its overall impact.

What is the plot of Padakkalam

Jithin (Sandeep Pradeep) is in love with his engineering college classmate Jeevika (Niranjana Anoop) but she suddenly decides to break up with him citing personal differences. While a heartbroken Jithin is trying to brainstorm with his friends – Ramzad (Arun Pradeep), Kannan (Saaf) and Nakul (Arun Ajikumar) – on what do, a college strike is on with Jithin’s department demanding that their HOD be replaced as he got the job with fake documents.

Advertisement

Now, senior professor Shaji (Suraj Venjaramoodu) is eyeing the post as is a younger, student-friendly Renjith (Sharafudheen). Shaji gets elevated as HOD naturally as he is senior but Jithin and his friends discover something is amiss when Shaji starts behaving strangely and their suspicion falls on Renjith. They believe that Renjith has used some supernatural power and/or black magic to control Shaji and start to investigate this. They shockingly discover that he can control people through some means and are worried what his main objective is. And they get into a major issue. What has gone wrong? What does Renjith do? How does this situation get resolved?

What works and what doesn’t

While the premise of the story – the supernatural and body swapping element – is interesting, the entire aspect of setting it in a college and using it in the context of a professor who eyes an HOD chair is extremely flimsy. The story is weak from the beginning and while the four students, Suraj Venjaramoodu and Sharafudheen have been used to elicit laughs using situations, mannerisms and dialogues, it’s only partly effective. It is the performances of Suraj Venjaramoodu and Sharafudheen (especially after the body swap occurs) that stand out and it is thanks to them that the movie keeps the audiences engaged for the most part. However, this is just not enough to make the movie totally fun ride. The female characters in the movie – Jeevika and Shaji’s wife (Pooja Mohanraj) – hardly have no major role to play and that’s unfortunate.

On the whole, Padakkalam is a decent attempt by director Manu Swaraj to give the audiences a clean campus supernatural fantasy comedy but it is the poor writing that lets down the film.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Nonnas

Published

on

Nonnas

Movie Review

For Joe Scaravella, food means family.

Growing up in an Italian family in Brooklyn, the feasts that his family and friends would prepare—and share—were more than just meals. They were expressions of love. Of heritage.

And no one’s food had a greater impact on Joe than that of his mother and nonna (an Italian term for “grandmother”). As a boy, he would marvel as his nonna made her famous Sunday gravy. And when he would taste it—perfetto! Nothing felt more like home.

Joe’s childhood was a time of full houses, full hearts and (of course) full stomachs.

But 40 years later, things have changed.

Advertisement

Joe’s mother just passed away after a long illness. He lost his nonna some time before that. He has no wife, no children with which to share a family meal. His home, once so full, now feels very empty.

His lifelong friend, Bruno, is worried about him. He encourages Joe to do something for himself with the money his mother left him. It doesn’t take long for Joe to figure out what that might be.

He’s going to open a restaurant, in honor of his mother and his nonna.

Bruno is doubtful. Restaurants are risky ventures, and Joe doesn’t know the first thing about starting, let alone operating, one. And Joe is no professional cook. Who’s he going to hire as his chefs?

That’s easy, Joe says, he knows exactly who he wants to cook at his restaurant: Nonnas. Italian grandmothers.

Advertisement

They’ll bring the best of their own family recipes to make at the restaurant. The community can gather to enjoy their heartfelt meals. And, ultimately, Joe hopes, food will mean family again.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending