Movie Reviews
SINNERS Review
Dominant Worldview and Other Worldview Content/Elements:
Very strong mixed worldview with politically correct liberal/leftist revisionist history making false accusations against white people to build racial animosity, some strong occult elements featuring vampires and rural superstitions, mitigated slightly by positive Christian references to sacrifice, to a possible heavenly afterlife, and to a gospel song, “This Little Light of Mine,” which is based on something Jesus says in the Bible;
Foul Language:
At least 82 obscenities (including at least 25 “f” words), one profanity using the name of Jesus, six GD profanities, and four light exclamatory profanities;
Violence:
Extremely bloody violence involves vampire attacks, and people fighting vampires to survive;
Sex:
Briefly depicted fornication scene, a briefly depicted adulterous sex scene that turns out to be a vampire attack from the woman (she emerges with blood on her face and down her front and the man is dead), a married woman flirts with her ex-lover when he returns home after years away, and some suggestive sultry dancing;
Nudity:
No nudity, but some women are wearing slinky low-cut dresses at a rural nightclub;
Alcohol Use:
Lots of alcohol use and some drunkenness and one character seems to be an alcoholic;
Smoking and/or Drug Use and Abuse:
Smoking; and,
Miscellaneous Immorality:
Vampires try to use deceit to sneak into rural nightclub, and two brothers earned their fortune working as gangsters for Al Capone.
SINNERS turns out to be a bloody vampire movie about two black brothers in rural Mississippi in 1932 who, after earning lots of money working for Al Capone in Chicago, find their new juke joint invaded by three white vampires singing Irish folk ballads who are trying to snag the soul of their cousin, a blues player with a great future. SINNERS is a metaphorical, racist horror movie claiming that white people always steal black folk music, with lots of strong foul language, bloody violence and two sex scenes.
Michael B. Jordan stars in the movie as two twin brothers, Smoke and Stack. The brothers left their rural town to serve in World War I, then lived in Chicago, where they became part of Al Capone’s alcohol bootlegging outfit. They’ve returned home in 1932 to start a juke joint. They buy a large barn and some land from a white businessman. They also recruit their young cousin, Sammie, an amazing blues guitarist, to play at their place.
With Sammy in tow, Stack also recruits Delta Slim, an alcoholic harmonica player. Meanwhile, Smoke visits an old girlfriend, Annie, and the gravesite of their son who died in childbirth.
That night, the grand opening of the juke joint is going extremely well, with drinking and lots of music. However, the revelry gets interrupted by three white Southern vampires singing Irish folk ballads and asking to be invited into the place. Violent chaos ensues.
SINNERS is a weird genre smashup. It starts off as a rural drama about black empowerment in the Segregationist South, with a subplot about the local Asian grocer who’s become part of the community. Then, it turns into a crazy horror movie about white vampires.
The one thread that runs through both is the movie’s musical theme, which focuses on Sammie. In the movie’s beginning, Sammie’s father, admonishes him before the father’s church congregation for opening himself up to the Devil for singing the blues. However, during the movie’s vampire section, the movie’s musical premise shifts from the condition of Sammie’s soul to a political premise about white people, represented by the singing white vampires, appropriating and even stealing black people’s music. For example, at one point, the white leader of the vampires tells the people inside the juke joint that, if they give Sammie to them, they will let the other people go free. Also, the movie reveals that, when the vampires take a victim, they absorb the victim’s memories, knowledge and abilities.
Ultimately, therefore, SINNERS is a metaphorical story about the liberal/leftist claim that white people immorally appropriated or stole black people’s music to get rich. In this revisionist history, white people are always stealing black folk music, such as ragtime, blues and jazz. Rock and Roll is actually just a marketing term, but white rock singers and bands, from Elvis Presley and the Rolling Stones to Led Zeppelin and Eric Clapton, are particularly accused of stealing black rhythm and blues, aka R&B. Writer/Director Ryan Coogler of SINNERS seems to be promoting this claim with this movie.
However, this claim is based on some major lies. First of all, for example, rock music is actually a combination of different kinds of folk music, not only black blues and R&B but also country blues, bluegrass music, country and western music, Elizabethan and English musical harmonies and structures, and Celtic folk music. There’s a good argument, in fact, that the first recorded rock song was actually “Move It On Over” by country music star Hank Williams in 1947. Also, the famous black singer Chuck Berry, often considered the Father of Rock and Roll, had his first big hit in 1955 with “Maybelline,” but the tune he used is from a western swing song! Elvis Presley was discovered by the founder of Sun Records, Sam Phillips, in 1954, but Sam’s personal goal with his record company was to unite popular white music and popular black music. So, when Elvis took the country by storm in 1955 and 1956, it opened the door to many black artists singing blues, R&B and pop songs, getting recording deals and seeing their songs hit the top crossover charts too instead of just being confined to black communities. Also, many later rock artists like the Rolling Stones and Eric Clapton publicly acknowledged their debt to black R&B and blues artists like Muddy Water and BB King. It should also be noted that “country rock” and “Southern Rock” continue to be among the most popular kinds of rock music. Many male artists on the country charts today sing in that style. Finally, regarding earlier black folk music like ragtime, which developed into jazz, it should be noted that ragtime was popularized in the 1890s by a white vaudeville artist named Ben Harney. Now, Harney was a minstrel performer and often performed in blackface. However, he died destitute when ragtime music faded, even though he wrote many of his own ragtime songs with another man. The most famous black ragtime artist was, of course, Scott Joplin, but he also died destitute in 1917 after suffering the effects of a sexually transmitted disease contracted in 1903 or so and being committed to a mental institution. Black ragtime artists like Irving Jones and W. C. Handy fared better, however. Also, the most influential jazz concert was performed by white artist Benny Goodman and his band at Carnegie Hall in 1938. That concert helped make jazz popular throughout the whole United States. So, it helped both white and black jazz artists. Finally, if you go back to the apparent origins of ragtime music, the pre-slavery South, you’ll find out that plantation slaves held dance events called “rags.” The dances included reels, jigs and Scottish folk dances, which are primarily European, but were probably at least partly filled with African dances and sounds. However, the instruments used in these dances consisted of a banjo and a fiddle. All that said, ragtime is not considered a purely black music but a combination of African music and classical European music, with a Spanish tango rhythm sometimes added.
So, there’s no massive “stealing” happening here. Just an often beautiful and wonderful combination of cultural integration, developed in a capitalist, free market system that benefitted many people of different ethnicities.
Aside from its racist historical revisionism, SINNERS also has lots of strong foul language and lots of extreme bloody violence. It also has a depicted fornication scene and a depicted adulterous sex scene, plus some suggestive dancing.
However, one scene at the end of SINNERS acknowledges some kind of heavenly afterlife when a dying Smoke has a vision of his dead girlfriend reunited with their baby son who died in childbirth. Also, a post-credit scene shows Sammie singing the Christian hymn, “This Little Light of Mine,” a song that uses something that Jesus said in the New Testament. Also, one character sacrifices his life and soul to save two other people. So, the movie’s politically correct paganism is slightly mitigated by light Christan, biblical content.
Movie Reviews
Movie Review: ‘The Drama’ – Catholic Review
NEW YORK (OSV News) – Many potential brides and grooms-to-be have experienced cold feet in the lead-up to their nuptials. But few can have had their trotters quite so thoroughly chilled as the previously devoted fiance at the center of writer-director Kristoffer Borgli’s provocative psychological study “The Drama” (A24).
Played by Robert Pattinson, British-born, Boston-based museum curator Charlie Thompson begins the film delighted at the prospect of tying the knot with his live-in girlfriend Emma Harwood (Zendaya). But then comes a visit to their caterers where, after much wine has been sampled, the couple wanders down a dangerous conversational path with disastrous results.
Together with their husband-and-wife matron of honor, Rachel (Alana Haim), and best man, Mike (Mamoudou Athie), Charlie and Emma take turns recounting the worst thing they’ve ever done. For Emma, this involves a potential act of profound evil that she planned in her mind but was ultimately dissuaded from carrying out, instead undergoing a kind of conversion.
Emma’s revelation disturbs all three of her companions but leaves Charlie reeling. With only days to go before the wedding, he finds himself forced to reassess his entire relationship with Emma.
As Charlie wavers between loyalty to the person he thought he knew and fear of hitching himself to someone he may never really have understood at all, he’s cast into emotional turmoil. For their part, Rachel and Mike also wrestle with how to react to the situation.
Among other ramifications, Borgli’s screenplay examines the effect of the bombshell on Emma and Charlie’s sexual interaction. So only grown viewers with a high tolerance for such material should accompany the duo through this dark passage in their lives. They’ll likely find the experience insightful but unsettling.
The film contains strong sexual content, including aberrant acts and glimpses of graphic premarital activity, cohabitation, a sequence involving gory physical violence, a narcotics theme, about a half-dozen uses of profanity, a couple of milder oaths, pervasive rough language, numerous crude expressions and obscene gestures. The OSV News classification is L — limited adult audience, films whose problematic content many adults would find troubling. The Motion Picture Association rating is R — restricted. Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian.
Read More Movie & Television Reviews
Copyright © 2026 OSV News
Movie Reviews
Thimmarajupalli TV Movie Review: A grounded rural drama that works better in the second half
The Times of India
TNN, Apr 18, 2026, 3:39 PM IST
3.0
Story-The film is set in a quiet, close-knit village, Thimmarajupalli, where life follows a predictable rhythm, shaped by routine, relationships and unspoken hierarchies. The arrival of a television set marks a subtle but significant shift, slowly influencing how people see the world beyond their immediate surroundings. What begins as curiosity and shared entertainment starts to affect personal dynamics, aspirations and even conflicts within the community.Amid these changes, the film follows a group of villagers whose lives intersect through everyday interactions, simmering tensions and evolving relationships. As the narrative progresses, seemingly ordinary incidents begin to connect, revealing a layer of mystery beneath the surface.Review-There’s a certain patience required to settle into Thimmarajupalli TV. It doesn’t rush to impress, nor does it lean on dramatic highs early on. Instead, director Muniraju takes his time — perhaps a little too much, to establish the world, its people and their rhythms. The first half feels like a long, observational walk through the village, capturing its textures, silences and small interactions. This slow-burn approach may test your patience initially. Scenes linger, conversations unfold without urgency, and the narrative seems content simply existing rather than progressing. But there’s a method to this stillness. By the time the film begins to reveal its underlying tensions, you’re already familiar with the space — its people, their quirks and their unspoken conflicts.It is in the second half that the film finds its footing. The mystery element, hinted at earlier, begins to take shape, pulling the narrative into a more engaging space. The shift isn’t dramatic but noticeable, the storytelling gains purpose, and the emotional stakes become clearer. What once felt meandering now starts to feel deliberate. The film benefits immensely from its rooted setting. The rural backdrop isn’t stylised for effect; it feels lived-in and authentic. The cast blends seamlessly into this world, delivering natural performances that add to the film’s grounded tone. There’s an ease in how the characters interact, making even simple moments feel genuine.The background score works effectively in enhancing mood, particularly in the latter portions where the mystery deepens. It doesn’t overpower but gently nudges the narrative forward, adding weight to key moments. Visually too, the film stays true to its setting, capturing the quiet beauty and isolation of rural life. That said, the pacing remains inconsistent. Even in the more engaging second half, certain stretches feel slightly indulgent, as though the film is reluctant to let go of its observational style. A tighter edit could have made the experience more cohesive without losing its essence.Thimmarajupalli TV is not a film that reveals itself instantly. It asks for time and patience, but rewards it with sincerity and a quietly engaging narrative. It may stumble along the way, but its rooted storytelling and stronger latter half ensure that it leaves a lasting impression.—Sanjana Pulugurtha
Movie Reviews
‘Roommates’ Review: Sadie Sandler Navigates the Highs and Lows of Freshman Year in Chandler Levack’s Formulaic Netflix Comedy
The new Netflix comedy “Roommates” wastes no time before immersing audiences in campus co-habitation drama. We see a girl running through the quad before helplessly looking up to see her angry roommate throwing her underwear and used sanitary products out the window. A screaming match ensues, and we’re immediately left to wonder how they got here and how the feud will be resolved.
Except they’re not the eponymous roommates we’re supposed to care about. Chandler Levack‘s new film is structured like a Russian nesting doll of roommate stories, as the two girls are confronted by a guidance counselor who decides to tell them another story of freshman year roommates who didn’t get along at first. Aside from the occasional “How I Met Your Mother”-style reaction cutaway, that’s the last we see of those initial foes.
The real story is about Devon (Sadie Sandler), a soon-to-be freshman who is going through the universal experience of hoping that everything clicks for her in college after failing to find the right friends in middle school and high school. She’s cautiously optimistic when Celeste (Chloe East) agrees to be her roommate after a chance meeting at orientation, hoping the party-loving free spirit will help her come out of her shell and separate her from the nerdy image she maintained in high school.
But Devon quickly has to learn the lesson that hits so many of us sitcom and rom-com enthusiasts hard in early adulthood: the notion that opposites attract is utter nonsense, and trying to merge your day-to-day life with someone dramatically different is far more trouble than it’s worth. The two girls instantly clash, and Celeste remains a consistent thorn in Devon’s side as she tries to navigate all the familiar story beats of freshman year (parties, boys, missed homework assignments, Thanksgiving, et al).
Levack, a promising indie filmmaker with credits like “I Like Movies” and “Mile End Kicks” to her name, does serviceable work on what is clearly a director-for-hire job. There’s only so much visual wiggle room when you’re working with the all-too-familiar Netflix comedy aesthetic, but she gets distinct and compelling performances out of her two leads, executing the “Odd Couple” schtick without devolving into caricature. Jimmie Fowlie and Ceara O’Sullivan’s script relies on formulaic coming-of-age beats before drifting unexpectedly into absurdism in the third act. The film would have been stronger and more consistent by embracing that weirder tone from the beginning, but we’ll take what we can get.
While “Roommates” boasts plenty of familiar faces in supporting roles of varying consequence — Nick Kroll runs through all of the cliched “liberal dad” tropes, while Natasha Lyonne shows up as Devon’s endlessly supportive mom in a role that makes little use of her myriad talents — it’s primarily a star vehicle for its two leads. The film was produced through Adam Sandler’s Happy Madison production label, and it’s fair to assume that it exists to showcase Sadie’s talents as a performer. (Fittingly, parts of the film deal with the idea that being a nepo baby isn’t all it’s cracked up to be.) The young actress demonstrates a wide range of comedic and light drama chops, suggesting that she might be just as successful at playing approachable everywoman types as her father is.
While the comedy is hit-or-miss, “Roommates” does its best work when it shows how daunting teenage friendships can feel. Anyone who has ever defined themselves by an arbitrary social order designed by the cruelest and stupidest people on the planet (which is to say, anyone who has been a college freshman), should be able to relate to some of Devon’s struggles, and the film treats her problems with an admirable amount of empathy.
The film won’t be remembered as a campus classic, or even in the upper half of college movies, but it’s also not hard to see a world where somebody watches it at exactly the right time in their lives and proceeds to cherish it forever. “Roommates” has a real chance at being a formative experience for someone, which is more than a lot of movies can say. But those of us who have already been sufficiently formed? We can find better things to stream this weekend.
Grade: C+
“Roommates” is now streaming on Netflix.
Want to stay up to date on IndieWire’s film reviews and critical thoughts? Subscribe here to our newly launched newsletter, In Review by David Ehrlich, in which our Chief Film Critic and Head Reviews Editor rounds up the best new reviews and streaming picks along with some exclusive musings — all only available to subscribers.
-
Alabama6 minutes agoYMCA of South Alabama holds Healthy Kids Day in Spanish Fort
-
Alaska12 minutes ago
Bear injures two US soldiers during military training in Alaska | The Jerusalem Post
-
Arizona18 minutes agoNFL mock draft: 4-round projections for Arizona Cardinals
-
Arkansas24 minutes agoNo. 6 Arkansas ends top-ranked OU’s 31-game home winning streak with 3-2 decision
-
California30 minutes ago
Billionaire Steyer’s spending binge dwarfs rival campaigns in California governor’s race
-
Colorado36 minutes agoLandeskog – April 18 | Colorado Avalanche
-
Connecticut42 minutes agoOvernight Forecast for April 19
-
Delaware48 minutes agoState Police Arrest Dover Man for Assault and Aggravated Menacing in Dover – Delaware State Police – State of Delaware
