Connect with us

Movie Reviews

SINNERS Review

Published

on

SINNERS Review
(PaPaPa, PCPC, RHRH, OO, C, B, LLL, VVV, SS, AA, D, M):

Dominant Worldview and Other Worldview Content/Elements:

Very strong mixed worldview with politically correct liberal/leftist revisionist history making false accusations against white people to build racial animosity, some strong occult elements featuring vampires and rural superstitions, mitigated slightly by positive Christian references to sacrifice, to a possible heavenly afterlife, and to a gospel song, “This Little Light of Mine,” which is based on something Jesus says in the Bible;

Foul Language:

At least 82 obscenities (including at least 25 “f” words), one profanity using the name of Jesus, six GD profanities, and four light exclamatory profanities;

Advertisement

Violence:

Extremely bloody violence involves vampire attacks, and people fighting vampires to survive;

Sex:

Briefly depicted fornication scene, a briefly depicted adulterous sex scene that turns out to be a vampire attack from the woman (she emerges with blood on her face and down her front and the man is dead), a married woman flirts with her ex-lover when he returns home after years away, and some suggestive sultry dancing;

Nudity:

Advertisement

No nudity, but some women are wearing slinky low-cut dresses at a rural nightclub;

Alcohol Use:

Lots of alcohol use and some drunkenness and one character seems to be an alcoholic;

Smoking and/or Drug Use and Abuse:

Smoking; and,

Advertisement

Miscellaneous Immorality:

Vampires try to use deceit to sneak into rural nightclub, and two brothers earned their fortune working as gangsters for Al Capone.

SINNERS turns out to be a bloody vampire movie about two black brothers in rural Mississippi in 1932 who, after earning lots of money working for Al Capone in Chicago, find their new juke joint invaded by three white vampires singing Irish folk ballads who are trying to snag the soul of their cousin, a blues player with a great future. SINNERS is a metaphorical, racist horror movie claiming that white people always steal black folk music, with lots of strong foul language, bloody violence and two sex scenes.

Michael B. Jordan stars in the movie as two twin brothers, Smoke and Stack. The brothers left their rural town to serve in World War I, then lived in Chicago, where they became part of Al Capone’s alcohol bootlegging outfit. They’ve returned home in 1932 to start a juke joint. They buy a large barn and some land from a white businessman. They also recruit their young cousin, Sammie, an amazing blues guitarist, to play at their place.

With Sammy in tow, Stack also recruits Delta Slim, an alcoholic harmonica player. Meanwhile, Smoke visits an old girlfriend, Annie, and the gravesite of their son who died in childbirth.

Advertisement

That night, the grand opening of the juke joint is going extremely well, with drinking and lots of music. However, the revelry gets interrupted by three white Southern vampires singing Irish folk ballads and asking to be invited into the place. Violent chaos ensues.

SINNERS is a weird genre smashup. It starts off as a rural drama about black empowerment in the Segregationist South, with a subplot about the local Asian grocer who’s become part of the community. Then, it turns into a crazy horror movie about white vampires.

The one thread that runs through both is the movie’s musical theme, which focuses on Sammie. In the movie’s beginning, Sammie’s father, admonishes him before the father’s church congregation for opening himself up to the Devil for singing the blues. However, during the movie’s vampire section, the movie’s musical premise shifts from the condition of Sammie’s soul to a political premise about white people, represented by the singing white vampires, appropriating and even stealing black people’s music. For example, at one point, the white leader of the vampires tells the people inside the juke joint that, if they give Sammie to them, they will let the other people go free. Also, the movie reveals that, when the vampires take a victim, they absorb the victim’s memories, knowledge and abilities.

Ultimately, therefore, SINNERS is a metaphorical story about the liberal/leftist claim that white people immorally appropriated or stole black people’s music to get rich. In this revisionist history, white people are always stealing black folk music, such as ragtime, blues and jazz. Rock and Roll is actually just a marketing term, but white rock singers and bands, from Elvis Presley and the Rolling Stones to Led Zeppelin and Eric Clapton, are particularly accused of stealing black rhythm and blues, aka R&B. Writer/Director Ryan Coogler of SINNERS seems to be promoting this claim with this movie.

However, this claim is based on some major lies. First of all, for example, rock music is actually a combination of different kinds of folk music, not only black blues and R&B but also country blues, bluegrass music, country and western music, Elizabethan and English musical harmonies and structures, and Celtic folk music. There’s a good argument, in fact, that the first recorded rock song was actually “Move It On Over” by country music star Hank Williams in 1947. Also, the famous black singer Chuck Berry, often considered the Father of Rock and Roll, had his first big hit in 1955 with “Maybelline,” but the tune he used is from a western swing song! Elvis Presley was discovered by the founder of Sun Records, Sam Phillips, in 1954, but Sam’s personal goal with his record company was to unite popular white music and popular black music. So, when Elvis took the country by storm in 1955 and 1956, it opened the door to many black artists singing blues, R&B and pop songs, getting recording deals and seeing their songs hit the top crossover charts too instead of just being confined to black communities. Also, many later rock artists like the Rolling Stones and Eric Clapton publicly acknowledged their debt to black R&B and blues artists like Muddy Water and BB King. It should also be noted that “country rock” and “Southern Rock” continue to be among the most popular kinds of rock music. Many male artists on the country charts today sing in that style. Finally, regarding earlier black folk music like ragtime, which developed into jazz, it should be noted that ragtime was popularized in the 1890s by a white vaudeville artist named Ben Harney. Now, Harney was a minstrel performer and often performed in blackface. However, he died destitute when ragtime music faded, even though he wrote many of his own ragtime songs with another man. The most famous black ragtime artist was, of course, Scott Joplin, but he also died destitute in 1917 after suffering the effects of a sexually transmitted disease contracted in 1903 or so and being committed to a mental institution. Black ragtime artists like Irving Jones and W. C. Handy fared better, however. Also, the most influential jazz concert was performed by white artist Benny Goodman and his band at Carnegie Hall in 1938. That concert helped make jazz popular throughout the whole United States. So, it helped both white and black jazz artists. Finally, if you go back to the apparent origins of ragtime music, the pre-slavery South, you’ll find out that plantation slaves held dance events called “rags.” The dances included reels, jigs and Scottish folk dances, which are primarily European, but were probably at least partly filled with African dances and sounds. However, the instruments used in these dances consisted of a banjo and a fiddle. All that said, ragtime is not considered a purely black music but a combination of African music and classical European music, with a Spanish tango rhythm sometimes added.

Advertisement

So, there’s no massive “stealing” happening here. Just an often beautiful and wonderful combination of cultural integration, developed in a capitalist, free market system that benefitted many people of different ethnicities.

Aside from its racist historical revisionism, SINNERS also has lots of strong foul language and lots of extreme bloody violence. It also has a depicted fornication scene and a depicted adulterous sex scene, plus some suggestive dancing.

However, one scene at the end of SINNERS acknowledges some kind of heavenly afterlife when a dying Smoke has a vision of his dead girlfriend reunited with their baby son who died in childbirth. Also, a post-credit scene shows Sammie singing the Christian hymn, “This Little Light of Mine,” a song that uses something that Jesus said in the New Testament. Also, one character sacrifices his life and soul to save two other people. So, the movie’s politically correct paganism is slightly mitigated by light Christan, biblical content.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

‘Balaramana Dinagalu’ review: A restrained look at the gangster mind

Published

on

‘Balaramana Dinagalu’ review: A restrained look at the gangster mind

In K M Chaitanya’s Aa Dinagalu (2007), actor Atul Kulkarni, playing gangster Agni Sreedhar, says man is the biggest weapon in the underworld. “The rest are just properties,” he adds. The yesteryear Kannada crime drama, based on the real incidents from a big chapter of the Bengaluru underworld, stood out for its understated storytelling.

In Balaramana Dinagalu, which has the skeleton of a sequel to Aa Dinagalu, weapons are seen in the first scene. As the film progresses, we encounter an arsenal of knives, razors, machetes, and guns — each an extension of the gangsters’ identities and an indispensable tool in their quest to remain feared and lethal. Chaitanya attempts to make the movie a mix of reality and entertaining tropes.

Balaramana Dinagalu (Kannada)

Director: K M Chaitanya

Cast: Vinod Prabhakar, Priya Anand, Atul Kulkarni, Ashish Vidyarthi, Ramesh Indira

Runtime: 151 minutes

Advertisement

Storyline: Balarama, an ordinary young man from a remote village in Karnataka, becomes a dreaded gangster who rules Bengaluru

The director has roped in the same cast, who played the dreaded gangster trio of Kotwal Ramachandra (essayed by Sharath Lohitashwa), Jayaraj (Ashish Vidyarthi), and Agni Sreedhar (Atul) in Aa Dinagalu. That’s what makes one instantly curious about Balaramana Dinagalu. The only difference in the latest movie from the previous one is the fictionalised names of the real dons. Jayaraj becomes Jayaram, Sreedhar is Shashidhar, and Muthappa Rai is called Monnappa Rai (played by Ramesh Indira).

Even if these characters are the big draw in the movie, the plot revolves around the journey of Balarama, a character with a small yet significant presence in Aa Dinagalu. Vinod Prabhakar’s portrayal of the titular role is the film’s biggest takeaway. He makes us feel for the character, and is quite impressive in the final portions of the movie, where Balarama struggles to break free from the underworld’s trap.

Balaramana Dinagalu is impressive when it reflects the psychology of a gangster. Jayaram is shown helping the needy while Balarama urges young boys to focus on education. It’s as if these men who commit heinous acts, have a heart as well. Shashidhar is often called “intellectual gangster”, as the film reflects how the underworld fears well-read men in the field. Politicians and policemen, the supposedly the protectors of people being part of the crime nexus, strengthen the movie’s world-building.

The film falters in its inability to rise above the plot’s predictability. Balarama’s journey is no different from the often-seen life of an innocent man from a small town who becomes a gangster owing to uncontrollable circumstances. I wish the film had delved a bit more into Balaram’s personality. Why does he not resist becoming a gangster? What dreams did he have when he moved to Bengaluru from a small town?

Advertisement

“My hands speak louder than my words,” says Balarama. This signals that he is someone who settles conflicts with fists rather than conversations. Despite this detail, Balaram’s entry into the underworld feels too sudden. The predictability strips the sheen away from the well-shot action sequences, as the result of every fight is known beforehand.

Chaitanya is careful not to glorify the act of violence. He wants to portray the negative effects of violence on the children in a family, as the movie ends with a hard-hitting frame. It’s impressive that the actor-director duo has delivered a non-hero-worshipping gangster saga.

That said, the movie could have benefited from a couple of gripping episodes. While it’s important not to romanticise the life of a gangster, there is no harm in delivering moments of peak tension, the biggest plus of the genre. 

The assassination of Jayaram, the impact of Kotwal’s elimination on the underworld, or the Sakleshpura incident involving Monnappa Rai, had the potential to offer edge-of-the-seat, high-stakes portions, but they are rushed. The love story is simple, but it lacks emotional intensity between the lead couple. Santhosh Narayanan’s dance numbers are forgettable (despite it being his forte) while his montage melodies are beautiful.

Balaramana Dinagalu adopts a restrained, almost clinical approach to the gangster genre. While that keeps it from glorifying violence, it also leaves the narrative feeling a touch too neat and emotionally muted.

Advertisement

Balaramana Dinagalu is currently running in theatres

Published – June 28, 2026 07:58 pm IST

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

A New Dawn Anime Film Review

Published

on

A New Dawn Anime Film Review

Perhaps there’s a certain irony in a story about a fireworks factory mostly keeping away from explosive drama. Yoshitoshi Shinomiya‘s lowkey feature directorial debut A New Dawn is at the very least visually captivating, comprised of lush and rather hypnotic production design. The story is small scale focusing on a trio of friends who try to save a fireworks factory in their hometown, but the imagery feels expansive and lush. A New Dawn begins with a beautiful and vaguely familiar display of this beauty: the flowing, painterly imagery of its opening sequence recalls Shinomiya’s work on the flashback sequence in Makoto Shinkai‘s your name., immediately showing that the film’s visuals might transcend its small town drama.

A background artist himself on films by Makoto Shinkai as well as the similarly resplendent Pompo: The Cinéphile, it makes sense that this history would be felt in the background works of A New Dawn. They’re dense with detail, rich with almost luminous color and illustrative texture. Shinomiya, who also wrote and storyboarded the film, veers away from the photorealism associated with someone like Shinkai through some impressionist touches – like the splotches of green paint which represent treelines – which sometimes turns into outright abstraction like when a character begins to run through the space. Sometimes there are swaying, morphing textures in the background as splotches of paint subtly shift around. On a more intimate level, the cluttered and characterful interior spaces tell a story too. This is a long-winded way of saying A New Dawn looks really, really good.

It’s not just in the tableaux of its countryside habitats and ramshackle living spaces carved out of abandoned warehouses, but there’s a sense of invention permeating through A New Dawn‘s various experiments with visual languages of animation. The most prominent is an incredibly charming stop motion animated sequence using a cardboard diorama and real human hands invading the shot in a creative reflection of a drunken character’s perspective. Even though it broadly still looks “anime” through its character design, there are also smaller details which work to set A New Dawn apart from its contemporaries, touches like its occasional lineless artwork or the way rain is defined through smudged black brushstrokes.

It’s in the screenwriting where A New Dawn begins to feel more run of the mill. Its story about the constant chasing of the majesty of a fabled firework “Shuhari” feels both familiar in its premise but also a little bit alienating in its structure. The importance of the firework itself never feels clear – the moment its mystery is unravelled hardly feels like a revelation as a result, something amplified by how the writing often obfuscates what anyone is talking about. The whole story feels a little distancing, and despite the allure of the background art and design of the spaces the characters inhabit, the people themselves feel constantly at arms length.

It almost pulls things back with its climax – the detonation of the “Shuhari” goes a long way in justifying the circular conversations about its nature and origins – a painted streak of light launches into the sky before turning into something otherworldly, suddenly tripling down on the film’s captivating exaggerations.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Hollywood Pariah Kevin Spacey Opens in a Straight to Video Movie with 25 Producers, 1 Review, No Theaters, No Press – Showbiz411

Published

on

Hollywood Pariah Kevin Spacey Opens in a Straight to Video Movie with 25 Producers, 1 Review, No Theaters, No Press – Showbiz411
★ Make Showbiz411 your Preferred Source on Google

As we know, Kevin Spacey is a pariah in Hollywood.

He’s in a rare club with Mel Gibson, Armie Hammer, Nate Parker, Jonathan Majors, and James Franco.

Spacey has managed to avoid jail time by reaching settlements with various accusers of sexual malfeasance, all men.

His film career — which included two Oscars and a Tony Award — has been destroyed.

Advertisement

Spacey has been reduced to appearing in straight to video films, made for whatever reason the various producers involved know only to themselves.

On Friday, a new Spacey movie surfaced against its will, but not in theaters. It also went straight to video. “1780” is a period piece set during the Revolutionary War. Spacey plays a toothless Pennsylvania country trapper.

There is no rating on Rotten Tomatoes, largely because there is only one review. The review by Alan Ng of Film Threat is positive. Ng recently reviewed “World War Bigfoot,” which he also liked. He seems to specialize in reviewing films no one has heard of.

“1780” does boast 25 producers who will probably not see a return on their investment. But they can say they made a movie with Kevin Spacey.

Advertisement

Donate to Showbiz411.com

Showbiz411 is now in its 13th year of providing breaking and exclusive entertainment news. This is an independent site, unlike the many Hollywood trades that are owned by one company. To continue providing news that takes a fresh look at what’s going on in movies, music, theater, etc, advertising is our basis. Reader donations would be greatly appreciated, too. They are just another facet of keeping fact based journalism alive.
Thank you

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending