Connect with us

Movie Reviews

LEO Telugu Movie Review

Published

on

LEO Telugu Movie Review

Release Date : October 19, 2023

123telugu.com Rating : 2.75/5

Starring: Thalapathy Vijay, Sanjay Dutt, Trisha, Arjun, Gautham Vasudev Menon, Priya Anand, Mysskin, Mansoor Ali Khan, and others

Director: Lokesh Kanagaraj

Producer: Lalit Kumar

Advertisement

Music Director: Anirudh Ravichander

Cinematographers: Manoj Paramahamsa

Editor: Philomin Raj

Related Links : Trailer

Box office emperor Thalapathy Vijay joined forces with sensational filmmaker Lokesh Kanagaraj for the action drama, Leo. The film has been making noise right since its announcement, and its hype reached unprecedented levels now. The advance bookings have indicated that Leo will create a pandemonium at the ticket windows. Let’s see if this much-hyped film lived up to the expectations or not.

Advertisement

Story:

Parthiban (Thalapathy Vijay) runs a cafe in Theog, Himachal Pradesh. He is a normal family man who lives with his wife Satya (Trisha) and two children. One day a few goons attack Parthiban’s cafe and they threaten to kill his daughter and a worker there. With no option left, Parthiban kills the gangsters, which lands his family in trouble. When Parthiban is going through all this fuss, gangsters Antony Das (Sanjay Dutt) and Harold Das (Arjun) come into his life, and they believe Parthiban is their family member, Leo Das (Thalapathy Vijay). Who exactly is this Leo Das? What happened to him? How did Parthiban manage to get out of all this turmoil? This is what the rest of the film is about

Plus Points:

The film’s first half is pretty much engaging. The pace is intentionally kept slow here. The hyena scene and the follow-up family drama take us into the world of Parthiban. There is absolutely no rush in the proceedings. The intention was to establish the characters and the protagonist’s world in a neat manner. The movie reaches its peak during the cafe fight scene.

Vijay’s vulnerability is well depicted and hence the action blocks (first hour) give a ultimate high. Vijay is not just a star, but he is a good actor too. Leo precisely showcases the acting brilliance of Thalapathy Vijay. Fight scenes in the first half are well staged, and Vijay’s performance, coupled with well-crafted action blocks, keeps the proceedings engaging.

Advertisement

The interval block is decent, and it sets up things well for the second half. Leo has some excellent action blocks and solid cinematography. Trisha is fine in her role. The movie picks up pace in the pre-climax and climax portions. Yes, the film is a part of LCU, and the franchise fans have a few moments to cheer about. There is a small surprise in the end.

Minus Points:

Advertisement

The second half is always the key as it decides the film’s range. But most of the films of late are going through this second-hour syndrome. Unfortunately, Leo also falls in the same category. What’s actually surprising is the way the flashback portions are written. One wouldn’t expect such pale writing from someone like Lokesh Kanagaraj, who delivered terrific films.

The pacing is again slow post the interval mark, with nothing much happening storywise. But a few moments keep the film going until the commencement of the flashback portion, which takes down the movie. Due to the bad writing, Sanjay Dutt and Arjun don’t don’t make much impact. As said, the writing department needs to be blamed here.

Actors like Priya Anand don’t have anything to do in the movie. A key character, which a noted actress plays in the second half, is poorly designed. The intended emotional scenes lack punch. Telugu dubbing is fine, but the Naa Ready song is a big letdown. A Tamil song plays in the background during the cafe fight scene. It would have been better had the makers used some Telugu song here for the Telugu version. The minute detailing aspects like important paper cuttings, and matter engraved on a photo frame were in Tamil. These small details also do make a difference.

Technical Aspects:

Anirudh’s background score is good in parts. However it is not that great when compared to his best works like Master and Vikram. The songs, too, didn’t leave a mark, which was due to bad translation. The cinematography by Manoj Paramahamsa is stupendous. There is an action block in the flashback sequence, and the camera movement was superb here. The editing is below-par in the second half, while it is good in the first hour. The VFX was good in the hyena scene. When it comes to the car chase sequence, the VFX works are below par as the whole portion looks cartoonish.

Advertisement

Coming to the director, Lokesh Kanagaraj, he did just an okay job with Leo. Lokesh handled the first half neatly, but he couldn’t carry the same momentum in the second half. There is no doubt that we have seen this story multiple times, but what matters the most is how it is told. Lokesh has set the bar high with his films, but he couldn’t surpass the expectations completely with Leo, and he delivers just an okay product.

Verdict:

On the whole, Leo is an action entertainer that relies majorly on the performance of Thalapathy Vijay. The first half is engaging despite the slow pacing, but the film runs into trouble once the second half starts. The flashback portions and poorly designed characters are the major drawbacks. Leo is a part of the LCU, and there are a few moments for the franchise fans to cherish. Lokesh Kanagaraj’s magic is somewhat missing in Leo, and the box office prospects of the film depend on the stardom of Vijay and the LCU factor.

 

123telugu.com Rating: 2.75/5

Advertisement

Reviewed by 123telugu Team

Click Here For Telugu Review

Articles that might interest you:

Advertisement


Ad : Teluguruchi – Learn.. Cook.. Enjoy the Tasty food



Advertisement

TAGS:  Arjun, Gautham Vasudev Menon, LEO Movie Review, LEO Review, LEO Review and Rating, LEO Telugu Movie Review, LEO Telugu Movie Review and Rating, Mansoor Ali Khan, Mysskin, Priya Anand, Sanjay Dutt, Thalapathy Vijay, Trisha

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

The Fall Guy Movie Review: Ryan Gosling, Emily Blunt's Action Romance Is A Fun Ode To Filmmaking

Published

on

The Fall Guy Movie Review: Ryan Gosling, Emily Blunt's Action Romance Is A Fun Ode To Filmmaking

The Fall Guy Movie Review: Ryan Gosling, Emily Blunt’s Action Romance Is A Fun Ode To Filmmaking

About The Fall Guy

The hero of The Fall Guy is a stuntman, Colt Seavers, played by Ryan Gosling. The action romance is a madcap adventure that kicks off summer blockbuster season and reminds you one of the reasons you got to the movies – to see stuff get blown up. Director David Leitch‘s film highlights the nameless men and women behind your favourite action scenes. Using Gosling and Oppenheimer’s Emily Blunt as the amiable leads, The Fall Guy is a delightful love story with wonderful beats of comedy.

The Fall Guy: Plot

Inspired by the 1980s American TV series, The Fall Guy is a behind-the-scenes romance between camera operator-turned director Jody (Blunt) and Colt (Gosling), stunt double to one of the top stars in Hollywood. After a stunt goes horribly wrong, Colt disappears to lick his wounds. But he is summoned back to work on Jody’s directorial debut, Metalstorm, a sci-fi cosmic love story, where the exes have an awkward reunion. But Colt finds himself involved in much more dangerous plot as a situation threatens to derail Jody’s first film as director. With the film and his career on the line, Colt does what he knows best, he gets into action mode.

The Fall Guy: Writing and Direction

Drew Pearce’s screenplay is warm, heartfelt and makes you laugh out loud more than once, even though the main plot gets a bit silly at times. This is clearly a film made by those who love the movies and what it represents. There are several inside jokes about filmmaking and the movie business that manage to translate over.

Deadpool 2 and Bullet Train filmmaker Leitch, who himself was a stunt professional before, seems to be having a blast dropping his characters in outlandish situations. The action sequences that Colt finds himself in repeatedly are situations in which he has been preparing himself all his career. The title of the film has a nice nod to the predicament Colt finds himself in for the second half of the movie.

Advertisement

The Fall Guy: Performances

Over the last few years, there’s been a lot writeups about how there are no more movie stars anymore. With The Fall Guy, I’d like to present exhibits A and B. Both A-listers Gosling and Blunt are coming off two massive hits from 2023 with Barbie and Oppenheimer respectively. In this film, they combine their star power for fantastic chemistry as reunited exes. Whether they are bantering about listening to Taylor Swift or arguing about motivation in scene, their chemistry is always entertaining. A charismatic and self-deprecating Gosling especially nails the comedic portions.

Gosling and Blunt are backed by a great supporting cast, with Hannah Waddington as the harried film producer, Aaron Taylor-Johnson as the spoilt movie star Tom Ryder and Winston Duke as Metalstorm stunt’s coordinator. There’s also a scene-stealing cute dog named Jean Claude who only responds to commands in French.

The Fall Guy: Critique

The Screen Actors Guild is one of the few mainstream awards organisations that honours stunt performers. The Oscars recently announced that they would be adding a new category for casting from 2025. The Fall Guy makes a great argument as to why stunt professionals should be next on that list. From acting, comedy, romance to meta quips about the movie business, The Fall Guy checks all the boxes for a good time at the movies this summer.

End of Article

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Film Review: 18×2 Beyond Youthful Days (2024) by Michihito Fujii

Published

on

Film Review: 18×2 Beyond Youthful Days (2024) by Michihito Fujii

A compelling romantic film, bathed in nostalgia, that will please immensely the fans of this genre.

A real viral travelogue blog by Jimmy Lai is the inspiration behind “18×2 Beyond Youthful Days”, a Japan-Taiwan co-production, directed and co-written by Michihito Fujii of “The Journalist” fame.

18×2 Beyond Youthful Days is screening at Udine Far East Film Festival

36-year-old Jimmy (Hsu Kuang-han) is back at home in Tainan, after leaving it 18 years prior. He is going through a difficult and delicate stage of his life, having been excluded by the successful game developing company he founded and developed. It is certainly time for a break and a reassessment of life priorities and Jimmy starts from his ancestral home, where it all started. Rummaging into his bits and pieces in his teenager bedroom, he finds a postcard from an old crush, a Japanese traveler called Ami he had met the summer before starting University. Remembering how she liked travelling and how important it was for her; Jimmy decides to use this moment between jobs/decisions to explore Japan and maybe head towards Ami’s hometown in the North of the country.

From this point on, the film alternates flashbacks from that summer of 18 years ago and the slow trip that Jimmy is making by train across North Japan. Radiant backpacker Ami (Kiyohara Kami) had showed up one summer day at the karaoke parlor where Jimmy was working his summer job, waiting to know the results of the university admission exams. She had lost her wallet and just needed to work for a short while in order to save enough money to carry on her journey. It had been love at first sight for clumsy and shy Jimmy and Amy had always been friendly with him but somehow distant. Memories of that bright summer until the moment they had parted, and Amy had left Taiwan, resurface while today-Jimmy travels and meets some friendly strangers on his way; It was a summer that had shaped heavily his life choices and his future.

Advertisement

Michihito Fujii attempts an interesting experiment with an unusual mix of romantic teen drama, coming-of-age, travelogue, past and present, set in Taiwan and Japan, alternating both languages. The episodic structure of the film utilizes a series of flashbacks that gradually reveal the past events, some generated by conversations that Jimmy has with his occasional travel companions in his soul-searching itinerary that unfold at the same time. The two lines will eventually collide during the final act. It is an ambitious project as the fragmented nature of the narrative in these kind of flashback-rich films is often confusing and tedious too at times. However, in “18×2”, the pieces of the jigsaw fall in place rather effectively, completing nicely an elliptic arch of narrative.

The two 18-year-apart lines of narrative are kept well separated until the last act, by a series of stylistic choices. First of all, an almost opposite palette of colors, a bright, yellowish light imbues young Jimmy’s memories, giving it a luminous feeling of youth and cheerfulness. On the contrary, adult Jimmy is set against a muted gray/blue snowy landscape, a sobriety that reflects his moment in life. Camerawork follows this stylistic line too with a net distinction between a dynamic past and a more static present. Moreover, the acting complements these technicalities, with a virtuoso performance from Hsu Kuang-han, acting restless, messy and fidgety as a clumsy teenager and beautifully restrained as a 36-year-old man.

However, despite the clever storytelling, the film suffers a bit of a lack of “pizazz” in a plot the eventually feels slightly predictable and doesn’t add much to the plethora of similar stories. A good job at overcoming this lack is carried on by the good protagonists’ chemistry and the amiable characters that populate Jimmy’s youth, Ami, of course, and the whole gang of his co-workers at the Karaoke joint, run by a charming boss.

All in all, “18×2 Beyond Youthful Days” is a compelling romantic film, bathed in nostalgia, that will please immensely the fans of this genre.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie review: Gosling/Blunt charisma rescues 'Fall Guy' – UPI.com

Published

on

Movie review: Gosling/Blunt charisma rescues 'Fall Guy' – UPI.com

1 of 5 | Ryan Gosling and Emily Blunt star in “The Fall Guy.” Photo courtesy of Universal Pictures

LOS ANGELES, April 30 (UPI) — The chemistry between Ryan Gosling and Emily Blunt powers The Fall Guy, in theaters Friday, despite a shaky script. Whenever they’re not on screen it becomes apparent the film is nothing without them, but they are in it enough to keep it fun.

Colt Seavers (Gosling) is stuntman to Tom Ryder (Aaron Taylor-Johnson). When Tom insists on a second take of a stunt, Colt sustains a back injury and quits the stunt business.

18 months later, producer Gail Meyer (Hannah Waddingham) asks Colt to come back for the directorial debut of Jody Moreno (Emily Blunt). Colt hasn’t called Jody since the accident, so their reunion is not smooth.

The ’80s TV series was about a stuntman turned bounty hunter, which makes sense for weekly adventures. The movie is more determined to showcase the profession of stunt coordinators and performers.

Advertisement

Director David Leitch was a stuntman and his production company, 87 North Productions, is the elite in the industry. So it’s okay if the plot of The Fall Guy movie is a little thin to justify having fun with its homage, but then it should get to the fun more quickly.

Gail actually called Colt to find Tom, who has disappeared, without the studio finding out. The more charming story is the tale of a stuntman and director falling back in love.

The scenes between Colt and Jody are the strongest of the film, whether Jody is using a sci-fi movie’s plot to blatantly address their relationship or whether they are fighting in a case of mistaken identity. The film spends too much time on the Tom plot when it should be about Colt and Jody.

Since The Fall Guy is a comedy, the action outside the movie set leads to more jokes than danger. The film plays Colt as a goofball, not a cool action hero, for which Gosling is totally game.

Colt does use his stunt powers while investigating Tom’s disappearance. Since he knows how to get hit by a car and survive, Colt will literally stand in the way of an escaping suspect.

Advertisement

Colt can use a staircase as a ramp to launch a vehicle during a car chase. The film’s climax on the movie set incorporates the stunt and pyrotechnic departments too.

It was a mistake to Intercut a good chase with a scene of Gail and Jody in a bar, thus ruining the energy of the action scene. But other moments, like Colt and Jody discussing the use of split screen while actually performing on split screens, are impressive.

Colt has almost as much chemistry with stunt coordinator Dan Tucker (Winston Duke) as he has with Jody. Dan helps Colt investigate the Tom mystery while they quote action movies to each other.

The fake titles of Tom’s movies sound believable, except they are apparently all originals and not based on pre-existing intellectual property such as The Fall Guy itself. The script rightfully calls out the fact that the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences still refuses to add a category for a stunt Oscar.

The Fall Guy shows audiences how productions now scan actors and their stunt people so they can put the actors’ faces on footage of their stuntmen performing dangerous feats. So it’s a little disingenuous when the film purports to show closeups of Gosling in action when it explicitly showed how modern movies can fake that.

Advertisement

A behind-the-scenes montage during the end credits does show Gosling’s double doing some of the major stunts from the film, and a few where it was actually Gosling being pulled on wires.

So, given that the mystery of Tom’s disappearance is slight and, without spoiling, only becomes more convoluted, it really should have been relegated to a background subplot. But, The Fall Guy doesn’t take itself as seriously as other movies with even more convoluted plots, so it amounts to more fun than not.

Fred Topel, who attended film school at Ithaca College, is a UPI entertainment writer based in Los Angeles. He has been a professional film critic since 1999, a Rotten Tomatoes critic since 2001, and a member of the Television Critics Association since 2012 and the Critics Choice Association since 2023. Read more of his work in Entertainment.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending