Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Family Review: Don Palathara’s Film Is Mellow, Incisive And Attentively Chiselled

Published

on

Family Review: Don Palathara’s Film Is Mellow, Incisive And Attentively Chiselled

A nonetheless from Household.

Solid: Vinay Forrt, Divya Prabha, Mathew Thomas, Nilja Ok Child, Jolly Chirayath

Director: Don Palathara

Ranking: 4 and a half stars (out of 5)

Advertisement

The movie premiered on Saturday on the ongoing Worldwide Movie Competition of Rotterdam 2023

A delicate, penetrating and austere portrait of a rural group over which the Church holds sway in ways in which alternate between the important and the intense, Household, writer-director-editor Don Palathara’s sixth function movie, is an affidavit to his eager eye for element, agency grasp on the medium and talent to handle intricate, demanding themes with sensitivity.

The Malayalam movie, that includes Vinay Forrt and Divya Prabha in key onscreen roles, had its world premiere on Saturday within the Harbour part of the 52nd Worldwide Movie Competition of Rotterdam (IFFR, January 25 to February 5, 2023). That is Palathara’s second movie to make the IFFR lower. His Cinema is All the pieces was on the pageant in 2021.

Whereas Household marks a return to the Catholic setting of his first two movies, Shavam (The Corpse, 2015) and Vith(Seed, 2017), additionally it is a step ahead within the evolution of his refined craft and singular cinematic language. Within the span of eight years, Palathara has constructed a considerable physique of labor exceptional for its consistency. Household is a worthy addition to his oeuvre.

Household displays a posh actuality that doesn’t reveal itself both in its entirety or with absolute transparency. It’s a magnificently layered however minimalist depiction of the place and ethos that Palathara grew up in. His visible and narrative approach – restrained, tangential and loaded with which means – serves to deepen the drama of reality and obfuscation on the movie’s core.

Advertisement

Couched within the movie’s unerring cultural specificity are common truths about human behaviour. The underlying details and sides of the story and the characters emerge via solutions and indirect, passing references reasonably than with assistance from direct verbal means. On the floor, there may be repose, even one thing akin to stasis. Beneath it lies a posh net of ethical misgivings and manipulations.

Produced by Newton Cinema and scripted by Palathara and Sherin Catherine, Household performs out in a small village the place the minutest of transgressions are usually amplified by gossip, prurient curiosity and collective censure whereas essentially the most grievous of misdemeanours are quietly willed away by a society adept at closing ranks to guard its perception programs.

Shot in heat, muted colors, the movie focuses the ambiguities and angularities inherent within the socio-religious panorama. IT employs episodic encounters to disclose the best way the group capabilities. Innocuous conversations conceal insidious details or comprise intimations of hazard. Nonetheless, nothing that the script spells out has the texture of mere chilly data.

The movie probes the human capability to deflect consideration and activate a defence mechanism when the household faces a menace. As a girl who has devoted herself to the service of God factors out, a household is not only a organic entity. It’s a social assemble that hinges on loyalty to the parish and on the unifying energy of prayer and repentance.

The central determine in Household, apart from the Church, the nerve-centre of all exercise, is Sony (Forrt), a do-gooder and busybody who’s at all times at hand to assist the villagers. He’s a person that the village and the Church can’t appear to do with out. “He is sort of a son to all of us,” says a nun.

Advertisement

A graduate who as soon as ran a tuition centre and is now looking out for a proper job, Sony provides faculty youngsters classes in topics they’re weak in, takes the lead in voluntary initiatives, helps village ladies with their day by day chores, provides firm to the previous and ailing, attends youth league conferences and by no means misses holy mass.

Everyone – properly, nearly everyone – loves Sony. And Sony loves everyone. He’s a person who can do no improper. Or can he? Within the idyll that the village is on the face of it, there’s a leopard on the prowl. However the wild predator is not the one supply of unease and worry. The village has its share of different mishaps that set off alarm bells (however not in a literal sense as a result of the main target, in step with Palathara’s model, is on understatement).

An elopement has gone improper. The stigma triggers a dying by suicide. A rash schoolboy faces the results of a slipup. Different acts and secrets and techniques threaten to upset the fragile steadiness that has been fastidiously struck and sustained by the Church. Everyone is below scrutiny right here. Some pay the worth, others stroll free.

Because the darkness hiding beneath the floor creeps out from a void, the response from people who maintain the reins is swift and dependable. A self-willed pregnant younger lady, Rani (Divya Prabha, not too long ago seen within the 2022 Locarno title Ariyippu) is an unintended witness to what she has purpose to consider is a grave offence. However might she be imagining issues and leaping to conclusions? Gaslighting follows because the dominant forces take over.

Advertisement

Early within the movie, a cow falls right into a pit constructed to entice a leopard. The villagers swing into motion to rescue the animal. A lot later within the movie, it’s a human who’s in a metaphorical gap. It’s the flip of the Church to stage a rescue act. However who must be saved and from whom and what are questions that stay enveloped in a haze.

The pacing of the narrative and the character of the framing by director of images Jaleel Badusha recommend each detachment and intimacy. The digicam by no means will get too near the characters and views the panorama, the village and its denizens from a calculated distance. It nonetheless reveals a whole, acutely etched world in all its width and depth.

Vinay Forrt fleshes out a personality with a number of conflicting shades with numerous effort to spare. The underplaying, which an integral a part of the design and the pitching of the movie, enhances the affect of the efficiency.

Divya Prabha, whose character represents a voice of purpose in a local weather the place appearances and artifices are of paramount significance, delivers a efficiency of nice emotional depth.

Household is a mellow, incisive, attentively chiselled movie that critiques the human obsession with self-preservation it doesn’t matter what the ethical value could also be. Each as a bit of cinema and a chronicle of the leopards that lurk in our midst, it’s a powerful accomplishment.

Advertisement

Featured Video Of The Day

Reward For Shah Rukh Khan’s ‘Pathaan’ Pours In From Pakistan

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Unfrosted Movie Review: A sweet origins film which borders on the saccharine

Published

on

Unfrosted Movie Review: A sweet origins film which borders on the saccharine

Unfrosted opens with Jerry Seinfeld’s character, Bob Cabana, as he tells a young boy the fantastical tale of how Pop-Tarts were invented. We then warp back to the 1960s, a time when breakfast belonged solely to Kellogg’s and Post, locked as they are in a comical rivalry. This high-stakes competition pushes both companies to create the next breakfast revolution, resulting in the birth of the iconic Pop-Tart – and its lesser-known competitor, Post’s Country Squares.

Unfrosted is a heavily fictional reimagining of how the Pop-Tarts were invented. It is so fictional that the film even teases that one of the experiments led to the birth of a sea-monkey (brine shrimp) ravioli-like creature. Seinfeld throws in a ton of wacky historical cameos, taking some creative liberties with the past for laughs. At a point, the film teases that people like Jack LaLane, professional fitness coach, Steve Schwinn, founder of the Schwinn bicycle company, and Tom Carvel, who invented soft ice cream, were brought together to make the Pop-Tarts.In a lighter moment, McCarthy’s Donna suggests that even Albert Einstein could have been involved in the invention, if not for his passing. Seinfeld’s playful use of historical figures and his signature humour bring some hilarious punches. However, some political references and character cameos might fly over the heads of those unfamiliar with American history. The head-scratching could get in the way of the comedy.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘The Image of You’ review: Style over substance in the best way

Published

on

‘The Image of You’ review: Style over substance in the best way

Identical twins with opposite personalities are as big a part of thrillers as creepy kids are to horror. And if a romantic interest gets involved, the story becomes even more twisted. The Image of You follows Anna and Zoe (Sasha Pieterse, Pretty Little Liars), twin sisters who are close, but nothing alike. When Anna meets charismatic stock broker Nick (Parker Young, Call Me Kat), she thinks is perfect. Zoe is not so trusting and is determined to find out if he is really as great as he seems to be. 

Erotic thrillers are at their best when the focus is teasing the audience. That is certainly the case with The Image of You. The film provides plenty of titillating moments and sexy lingerie. Pieterse and Young have the smoldering looks and chemistry to make sure that anyone watching never looks away. It is a throwback to the halcyon days when the genre ruled late night cable. 

It really should not work. The plot is too derivative, the constant split screen is distracting, and the mystery lacks any tension. Yet, everything comes together thanks to some outrageous twists and the film’s willingness to never take itself too seriously. The Image of You is very much a case of style of substance, and it knows it.

Advertisement

While there are outliers, sex scenes in movies have decreased dramatically. Once a right of passage for teenagers, erotic thrillers have all but disappeared. The Image of You will not be the start of a resurgence of either, but it does stand out in today’s more sterile cinematic landscape. It is the type of entertaining fluff there is not enough of anymore.

The Image of You is out now on digital

Join the AIPT Patreon

Want to take our relationship to the next level? Become a patron today to gain access to exclusive perks, such as:

Advertisement

  • ❌ Remove all ads on the website
  • 💬 Join our Discord community, where we chat about the latest news and releases from everything we cover on AIPT
  • 📗 Access to our monthly book club
  • 📦 Get a physical trade paperback shipped to you every month
  • 💥 And more!

Sign up today

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

“Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes”: Disney's New Kingdom is Far From Magical (Movie Review)

Published

on

“Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes”: Disney's New Kingdom is Far From Magical (Movie Review)
Walt Disney Co./Courtest Everett Collection

Nearly sixty years removed, it is perhaps all too easy to forget just how radical of a work Franklin J. Schaffner’s original “Planet of the Apes” truly was. In adapting Pierre Boulle’s “La Planète des singes” novel into a feature film, Schaffner and co. maintained the book’s hard science-fiction intellectualism while also infusing it with a radical counterculturalism that resonated so deeply with younger audiences of the time. The resulting film often plays like a feature-length “Twilight Zone” episode in the best of ways, balancing more traditionally thrilling action sequences out with headier diatribes on the human condition, and fittingly so, seeing as it was co-written by Rod Serling himself.

After decades of sequels and one sensationally ill-advised attempt at a Tim Burton-helmed remake in 2001, the “Planet of the Apes” franchise half-stumbled into something remarkable in the 2010s. While “Rise of the Planet of the Apes” was a critical and commercial success, it wasn’t until that film’s sequel, “Dawn of the Planet of the Apes,” that a new legacy was truly cemented, with the addition of writer-director Matt Reeves. Reeves’ films, “Dawn” and “War for the Planet of the Apes,” brought a raw and immediate emotionality to the work that, when paired with similarly excellent elements such as Andy Serkis’ phenomenal lead performance and Michael Giacchino’s decadent musical score, truly brought “Planet of the Apes” to a new generation. In many ways, just as Schaffner’s 1968 film reflected the fears and anxieties of its era and spoke directly to audiences of the day in primal form, so too did Reeves’ films for modern audiences of the 2010s.

It is into this legacy that Wes Ball’s quasi-sequel/quasi-reboot/quasi-legacy-sequel, “Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes,” enters. And while Ball’s film is perfectly functional, competent, and resplendent in its technical achievements, “Kingdom” spends its entire runtime shouldering the burden of the franchise’s history, to its own detriment.


5. WEAK SPOT: THE OPENING

    It truly cannot be overstated what a colossal misstep “Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes” takes in its literal opening frames. Opening on the deathbed and funeral pyre of Andy Serkis’ Caesar from the previous trilogy, surrounded by characters from those films, “Kingdom” delivers a fond farewell to these characters and drops its title card, right before hard cutting to a full 300 years later. This is so bizarre for so many reasons (the in-film ‘many generations later’ text is laugh-inducing) but chief among them is that it actively works to put distance between the audience and Noa, the primary character of this film.

    Noa doesn’t know who Caesar was and is going to spend the next two-and-a-half hours of runtime finding that out as well as hearing apes debate over Caesar’s teachings and legacy. So opening with Caesar on his deathbed, surrounded by characters who mean nothing to this film, is indulgent at best and detrimental at worst. It prioritizes a quick dopamine hit of nostalgia that serves no purpose over the audience’s actual connection to the present-tense characters and story.

    Advertisement

    4. THOSE MONKEYS THOUGH

      The visual effects, spearheaded by the fantastic team at Wētā FX, continue to be absolutely incredible here. With each successive film in the previous trilogy, the bar was raised for exactly how authentically a human actor’s performance could be translated to the face of a digital ape. “Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes” proudly continues this tradition, allowing its actors’ performances to truly shine through the digital augmentation.

      In addition to this, the ape-on-ape action sequences are well-staged here, especially an early one that kicks off Noa’s Campbellian hero’s journey. There’s a visceral quality to the speed and momentum with which the Apes move, which is a fantastic blend of human movement and digital enhancement from Wētā FX. Furthermore, there’s a ton of little details throughout “Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes” that Wētā FX gets precisely right in fascinating ways, specifically in regards to artifacts and artifice of the camera and how the apes look within the frame. The delicate way in which focus shifts occur, the way lens flares react through this digital interface—it’s all exquisitely well-constructed.

      3. WEAK SPOT: REHASHING

        Director Wes Ball has spoken a lot about how “Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes” takes place 300 years after “War” to introduce audiences to an “Apes” world with exciting new story possibilities. In theory, that sounds perfect for a franchise running for nearly sixty years. However, in execution, that’s not at all what “Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes” delivers.

        For many Fox-owned properties, the Disney acquisition has led to surprisingly passionate and off-the-wall new films: Dan Trachtenberg’s “Prey,” Arkasha Stevenson’s “The First Omen,” etc. But “Kingdom” doesn’t feel like a passion project brought to fruition; it feels more like Disney looked at a spreadsheet and realized “Planet of the Apes” was among the most consistently profitable franchises in their new stable and commissioned a new one regardless. Instead of new ideas or stories, “Kingdom” mostly rehashes things audiences have seen before in this franchise.

        The sheer number of beats and story ideas that feel recycled, in whole or in part, from either “Dawn of the Planet of the Apes” or Schaffner’s original “Planet of the Apes” is staggering. Even the film’s attempt at an emotional, stakes-heightening climax sets up more conflicts we’ve already seen. Despite the lip-service to paving the way for new stories, “Kingdom” feels like someone shuffled their “Planet of the Apes” greatest hits playlist, and this is what we got.

        Advertisement

        2. THE HOOK OF RELIGIOUS THEMING

          The film’s most intriguing concept is treating Caesar like ape Jesus, despite the absurdity of the notion.

          By exploring the idea that Caesar’s ancient teachings have been distorted over centuries to serve the agendas of those with darker motives, “Kingdom” stumbles upon fertile creative territory. Like previous entries in the “Planet of the Apes” franchise, the film has the potential to offer a unique commentary on its contemporary era.

          In today’s polarized American society, we witness manipulative figures weaponizing religious texts for personal gain. The antagonist, Proximus Caesar, and his cohorts seem poised to symbolize this phenomenon, offering the beginnings of a pointed allegorical critique.

          1. WEAK SPOT: A FAILURE TO ENGAGE WITH SAID THEMING

              “Kingdom” initiates an intriguing premise but fails to delve deeper into its potential. While it deserves recognition for introducing this captivating concept, the film disappointingly fails to explore it meaningfully, merely skimming the surface.

              As the narrative unfolds, this deficiency becomes more apparent, culminating in a final conflict that feels rushed and disconnected from the central themes. Despite feeble attempts to link the religious motif with human involvement, it devolves into mundane ape versus human conflict, devoid of substance or relevance to the overarching theme.

              Advertisement

              (C)

              “Kingdom” misses a golden opportunity to parallel Caesar’s legacy with that of the “Planet of the Apes” franchise itself. The potential for a poignant reflection on how messages can be distorted over time, akin to the franchise’s impact on generations of audiences, remains largely unexplored. Instead, the film succumbs to repetitive storytelling, recycling familiar tropes and narratives without self-awareness or innovation.

              In essence, “Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes” falls victim to its own lack of originality, mirroring the very phenomenon it could have examined critically.


Continue Reading

Trending