Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘Doin’ It’ Review: Lilly Singh’s High-School Sex-Ed Comedy Gets an Incomplete

Published

on

‘Doin’ It’ Review: Lilly Singh’s High-School Sex-Ed Comedy Gets an Incomplete

Doin’ It revolves around surely the most literal interpretation imaginable of the old saying “those who can, do; those who can’t, teach.” Lilly Singh stars as Maya, who stumbles almost by accident into a job teaching sex ed, despite still being a virgin. As she schools her kids on everything from consent to gender identity to orgasms, Maya sets out to unlearn the shame that she herself internalized at that age — and maybe even to get laid for the first time.

Good intentions practically drip off the premise, which makes a convincing case for dismantling the fear and ignorance around adolescent sex ed. And Doin’ It puts its money where its mouth is — its jokes eschew pearl-clutching or coyness in favor of in-your-face crassness. But the comedy never quite settles into a comfortable rhythm, and eventually backs itself into a corner so far away from any recognizable reality that it threatens to undermine the very message it wants to send.

Doin’ It

The Bottom Line

Good intentions, uneven execution.

Advertisement

Venue: SXSW Film Festival (Narrative Spotlight)
Cast: Lilly Singh, Ana Gasteyer, Sabrina Jalees, Trevor Salter, Sonia Dhillon Tully, Stephanie Beatriz, Mary Holland, Utkarsh Ambudkar
Director: Sarah Zandieh
Screenwriters: Lilly Singh, Sara Zandieh, Neel Patel

1 hour 30 minutes

Doin’ It‘s NSFW sensibility is front and center from the very first scene, in which a 15-year-old Maya has semen squirted in her face twice in five minutes by a friend who cannot control his excitement at getting to see her boobs. Her curiosity turns to humiliation, however, when a mishap involving a stage curtain reveals the moment to an entire auditorium of students and parents. Horrified, Maya’s mother (Sonia Dhillon Tully’s Veena) sends her packing to India, where her urges are further disciplined out of her: When she’s caught playing MASH in class, she’s made to stand outside in the heat “until all your dirty thoughts melt away.” By the time Maya returns to the States as a 30something software engineer shilling for a teen-oriented app, she’s hardly more experienced than she was as a teen. But in an effort to research her target demo, she picks up the teaching job and simultaneously tries to catch up on all the adolescent experiences she missed way back then.

Doin’ It is at its brightest in Maya’s personal journey of self-liberation, which yields one comically mortifying situation after another. While the actual gags are hit or miss (running bits frequently overstay their welcome, and too many jokes are built on formats so hoary we can see the punchline coming from three miles away), the frankness with which they’re presented is refreshing: Maya may blush at seeing her first vibrator, but her movie has no qualms about showing us that same vibrator messy with recent use. Its playful attitude toward sex is most fully embodied by Sabrina Jalees as Maya’s BFF Jess, a scene-stealer whether she’s fingerbanging papayas at the grocery store or crowing about how her DJ girlfriend “remixes my pussy like fucking Tiësto.”

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the film extends sincere empathy toward Maya’s struggle to internalize in private the sex-positive values she espouses in public. “I’m confident with everything else but when it comes to this stuff, it’s like I’m broken,” she cries after a date with a cute fellow teacher (Trevor Salter) ends with her cruelly projecting her own fears about being “weak” and “prudish” onto him.

Her arc is neatly complemented by her mother’s. When Veena insists she couldn’t possibly date because she’s not that kind of woman — even while she laps up storylines about middle-aged romance on Never Have I Ever — we see how repression gets handed down the generations. In that light, Maya’s determination to break the cycle with her own students feels all the more noble.

The problem is that Doin’ It‘s idea of Maya’s work is so underbaked, it’s practically raw. “Maybe I have an opportunity here,” she muses when Jess mentions that half the schools in the state don’t even have sex ed, and that’s all it takes for Maya to decide to throw out the abstinence-only curriculum mandated by the district. On her first day, she’s so green she doesn’t know the difference between an IUD and a UTI. Seemingly overnight, she’s playing Betty Dodson videos and breaking down the best woman-on-top sex positions without so much as batting an eye. In doing so, she’s framed as an inspirational teacher in the Dead Poets Society mold, meeting her students at their own level in defiance of the oppressive standards that define the world around them. But the script, by Singh, director Sara Zandieh and Neel Patel, is never very clear about the challenges or the stakes she faces.

The opposition to her teachings is strangely toothless — none of the other parents or teachers even notice how drastically she’s strayed from the lesson plan for weeks, and once they do, the ensuing pushback plays out with more confusion than venom. It’s outside the scope of any one movie, let alone a lighthearted comedy like this one, to fix the state of sex ed in America. But as high-school students in the real world deal with book bans, limited contraception access and parental notification bills, Doin’ It‘s reluctance to touch on those weightier topics has the effect of minimizing the problem. In this fantasy, all you need to transform an entire generation’s relationship with sex is for a single teacher to decide that she wants to do it.

“We need a sexual revolution, and it starts in this place, today,” Maya declares in a dramatic speech, and she’s not wrong — her own storyline in Doin’ It serves as a warning of how the damage wrought by shame can take years or decades or entire lifetimes to move past. But if today’s youth indeed deserve honesty, the film might start by being a bit more candid about what the sex-positivity movement is really up against.

Advertisement

Full credits

Venue: SXSW Film Festival (Narrative Spotlight)
Production companies: Likely Story, Unicorn Island Productions, Camelback Productions
Cast: Lilly Singh, Ana Gasteyer, Sabrina Jalees, Trevor Salter, Sonia Dhillon Tully, Stephanie Beatriz, Mary Holland, Utkarsh Ambudkar
Director: Sara Zandieh
Screenwriters: Lilly Singh, Sara Zandieh, Neel Patel
Producers: Anthony Bregman, Erica Matlin, Polly Auritt, Lilly Singh, Anita Verma-Lallian
Executive producers: Sara Zandieh, Neel Patel, Jawad Ahsan
Cinematographer: Jason Oldak
Production designer: Peter Cosco
Costume designer: Georgia Yarhi
Editor: Jon Philpot
Composer: Tom Westin, Zachary Greer
Casting directors: Jeanne McCarthy, Nicole Abellera Hallman, John Buchan, Jason Knight
Sales: WME

1 hour 30 minutes

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

Adam MacDonald’s ‘THIS IS NOT A TEST’ (2026) – Movie Review – PopHorror

Published

on

Adam MacDonald’s ‘THIS IS NOT A TEST’ (2026) – Movie Review – PopHorror

By and large, the zombie subgenre has bitten off more than it can chew in modern times. Between George Romero survival films and camp comedies, the well has become pretty infected. But once in a while, along comes a movie like This Is Not A Test.

Let’s sink our teeth into this new release and see how it stacks up against the classics.

This Is Not A Test was directed by Adam MacDonald (Pyewacket 2017, read our review here), and written by MacDonald and Courtney Summers (in their debut credit). It stars Olivia Holt (Heart Eyes 2025) as Sloane and Froy Gutierrez (The Strangers: Chapter 1 2024) as Rhys. This is a standard zombie outbreak faire that sees a girl on the verge of ending her life, suddenly join a group of kids that are striving to survive a zombie apocalypse.

The tone and tenor of this film represent the classic survival movies like Night Of The Living Dead. But the thing that grabs the audience about This Is Not A Test is the trauma of the characters. Holt shines as a withdrawn survivor of an abusive home, trying to cut through the wreckage to reunite with her sister. Each of the main characters have standout traits, and they bathe in strongly acted moments as the stress of the situation changes who they are.

The gore in This Is Not A Test is pretty strong. The attacks spring quickly and when they do, the special effects team does a good job showcasing the battle scars. The camera work is also frenetic in a good way, because the chaos of the chase scenes puts the viewers in a first-person perspective. This film lets you feel like a part of the survivors, so their journeys are interactive.

Advertisement

Longtime fans may say that there’s nothing new in This Is Not A Test, and maybe they’re right. There’s no fresh take on the monsters here, no crazy origin, nothing that we haven’t seen in the past fifty-eight years. But the pacing nails a great balance between getting to know the characters and getting the zombie splatter fest. The mental meltdowns of the characters feel well earned, and the arc of Sloane and her sister brings a lot of heart and investment to the story. Even the most jaded zombie horror fans will find something to appreciate here, even as a background movie.

Adam MacDonald has made another intense hit here, and This Is Not A Test is currently available to stream on Shudder.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Film Review: “The Odyssey” – MediaMikes

Published

on

Film Review: “The Odyssey” – MediaMikes

 

  • THE ODYSSEY
  • Starring:  Matt Damon, Tom Holland and Anne Hathaway
  • Directed by:  Christopher Nolan
  • Rated:  R
  • Running time:  2 hrs 45 mins
  • Universal

 

Our score:  4.5 out of 5

 

EPIC.  If I was asked to describe Christopher Nolan’s latest film, that is the word I would use.  He has mounted a film that rivals the greatest achievements of filmmakers like Cecil B. DeMille or David Lean.  And, like the films of those mentioned, it’s runs a tad too long.

Advertisement

 

I was shocked, but pleased, to see that my 12-year-old granddaughter recently did a school paper on King Agamemnon.  Thank goodness they’re still teaching History in our schools.  Based on Homer’s “The Odyssey,” the film tells the story of King Odysseus (Damon) and his adventures which, if you’ve read “The Odyssey,” include the Trojan Horse, the Cyclops and assorted angry Greek gods.  The film covers each of these adventures in great detail, sparing nothing in the production design department.  While Odysseus is away – and he’s gone for a l-o-n-g time, his wife Penelope (Hathaway) has to endure a never ending string of “suitors,” men lining up in the hopes of replacing the King should he not return.  The men are nothing more then scavengers, taking advantage of the law of Zeus, which decrees no one should be turned away.  This angers the Queen’s son, Telemachus (Holland), who must control his temper when the men try to bait him into a fight, the idea being if Telemachus is killed, the new husband would become the King.  It’s all very interesting and complicated.  And long.

 

Director Nolan is one of the rare filmmakers who, in my opinion, has never made a bad film.  From “Memento” to the “Dark Knight” trilogy to the Oscar-winning “Oppenheimer,” he has proven himself a true master of cinema.  “The Odyssey” only adds to that distinguished resume’

 

Advertisement

The cast is a tribute to Nolan himself who, like Woody Allen, can pretty much get anyone he wants for his films because, as an actor, why wouldn’t you want a credit in one of his films.  Besides the three stars named above, the cast includes Robert Pattinson, John Leguizamo, Zendaya, James Remar, Jon Bernthal, Oscar nominees Samantha Morton and Elliot Page as well as Oscar winners Charlize Theron and  Lupita Nyongo.  As MGM used to advertise, “more stars than there are in heaven.”

 

The script and story are pretty faithful to the source material, though for some reason it bothered me whenever Telemacus referred to Odysseus as “dad.”  Never father.  The weird things you notice.  Visual.y the film is stunning and the Trojan Horse and battle of Troy are worth the price of admission alone.  I will add that I did see the film in 70 mm and, if that format is playing in your town, I urge you to see it in that format.

 

On a scale of zero to five, “The Odyssey” receives ★★ ½

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Saari Review: Memory, Betrayal and Identity Converge at River Valley Film Festival – Hollywood Times

Published

on

Saari Review: Memory, Betrayal and Identity Converge at River Valley Film Festival – Hollywood Times

Premiering at the 2026 River Valley Film Festival, Saari uses fragmented memories, Finnish landscapes and restrained performances to explore betrayal, identity and reconciliation.

By Valerie Milano

Palm Springs, CA (The Hollywood Times) 7/14/26 – In the visually striking short film Saari—Finnish for “island”, a peaceful family retreat becomes the setting for the slow collapse of a relationship.

Co-written by Justin Seegmueller, Corey L’Esperance and Suvi Härkönen, the film follows Daniel, played by Seegmueller, as he reflects on the choices that damaged his relationship with Liina, portrayed by Ilona Karppanen. Told through fragments of the past, present and future, Saari gradually reveals how secrecy and betrayal can transform a place of safety into one of emotional confinement.

Advertisement

The nonlinear structure was not simply a stylistic choice. The project was developed and filmed over more than a decade, with footage captured in Finland, Boston and the desert. L’Esperance explained that the filmmakers divided the story into “past, present and future,” allowing audiences to experience the relationship from both characters’ perspectives.

Click below for our exclusive interview: 

He described Daniel and Liina as two people who are “stuck in these moments in time,” making the fragmented narrative especially appropriate.

Seegmueller said Daniel’s internal struggle is rooted in the questions, “Am I that person? Am I still that person?” His restrained performance captures a man attempting to reconcile his current identity with the damage caused by earlier decisions.

Advertisement

For Seegmueller, the film is fundamentally about choice.

“It’s all about decision-making,” he said. “Are you an accumulation of all your decisions?”

Finland’s lush island scenery contrasts sharply with Daniel’s later isolation in the barren desert. Seegmueller described the progression as “lush and then dead,” a simple but effective visual representation of a relationship moving from intimacy and possibility to emotional aftermath.

For Liina, the island represents family history, comfort and security. By inviting Daniel there, she welcomes him into her sanctuary. His secrets, however, begin to contaminate that protected space.

“You let me into your life,” Seegmueller explained, “and now I’m here almost ruining your sense of security.”

Advertisement

Because the couple reaches the island by rowboat, the setting also creates a sense of entrapment as suspicion and resentment begin to surface. L’Esperance noted that once they are there, “there’s not really anywhere you can go.”

The film’s cross-cultural perspective was strengthened by the collaboration between American co-director L’Esperance and Finnish co-director Härkönen. Their responsibilities shifted according to which character dominated a scene. L’Esperance generally led sequences centered on Daniel, while Härkönen took a stronger role when Liina’s experience was at the emotional forefront.

That approach helps prevent Liina from existing only as a reaction to Daniel’s behavior. Her journey eventually becomes more compelling than his guilt.

Karppanen traveled to the United States for the first time to film the Boston scenes, which were completed approximately three years after the original Finland footage. Seegmueller said the friendship they developed during production can be seen in the warmth between their characters during the relationship’s happier moments.

The filmmakers deliberately avoid explaining every detail of Daniel’s betrayal. Earlier edits revealed even less, but test audiences needed additional narrative guidance.

“We do need to have some breadcrumbs,” L’Esperance said, explaining that without them, the story became “a little too lost on the audience.”

Advertisement

The challenge was to provide enough information while maintaining the film’s quiet, interpretive tone. L’Esperance said they wanted to leave room for viewers to “fill in some of the blanks.”

The lengthy production process also changed how the filmmakers viewed Daniel. L’Esperance acknowledged that they initially saw him as “this hero,” but over time recognized that “he is kind of a bad guy in some of these aspects.”

That evolving perspective gives the film greater moral complexity. Daniel is not granted an easy redemption, and his introspection does not erase the harm he caused.

Karppanen brings strength and emotional restraint to Liina, who emerges from the experience as what L’Esperance called “a completely different person.” A final city scene suggests that she is beginning to reclaim her identity and imagine a future beyond Daniel and the relationship that betrayed her.

Subtle, atmospheric and open to interpretation, Saari asks whether people are defined by their worst decisions, and what reconciliation means when the damage cannot simply be undone.

After more than 10 years of work, the film’s world premiere at the River Valley Film Festival is especially meaningful. Both L’Esperance and Seegmueller attended film school in Philadelphia, making the Pennsylvania premiere a return to the state where their filmmaking journeys began.

Advertisement

Seegmueller hopes the film encourages audiences to examine their own choices and personal histories.

“What does that say about you?” he asked. “What does that say about your story and your own narrative?”

Saari will have its world premiere at the 2026 River Valley Film Festival. Seegmueller will attend the premiere in person, while members of L’Esperance’s family are expected to represent him at the festival.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending