Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Challengers (2024) – Movie Review

Published

on

Challengers (2024) – Movie Review

Challengers, 2024.

Directed by Luca Guadagnino.
Starring Zendaya, Josh O’Connor, Mike Faist, A.J. Lister, Nada Despotovich, Naheem Garcia, Alex Bancila, Hailey Gates, and Jake Jensen.

SYNOPSIS:

Tashi, a former tennis prodigy turned coach is married to a champion on a losing streak. Her strategy for her husband’s redemption takes a surprising turn when he must face off against his former best friend and Tashi’s former boyfriend.

Sports-themed narratives tend to culminate in a big matchup with an accolade or some form of personal and professional redemption involved, and while it would be accurate to say that director Luca Guadagnino’s Challengers builds to something similar, the entire film is ambitiously structured around such a match. Of course, the formatting of tennis (sets and match points) fittingly lends itself to such a format, with each set telling its own part of the film’s story while allowing for flashbacks continuously reshaping what viewers know about these characters and why they are playing each other.

Advertisement

Challengers is a psychosexual relationship drama that is, simply put, on-edge absorbing, leaving one sucked in for 2+ hours and questioning aspects of the narrative, eagerly guessing and anticipating the blanks being filled in. With that said, it’s a disservice to talk about the plot, especially since so much of the film’s intensely draining success comes from form and structure, seamlessly transitioning between past years and a 2019 low-level tournament matchup between Art Donaldson (Mike Faist) and Patrick Zweig (Josh O’Connor) playing for a confidence boost and to increase their player ranking, respectively,  essentially vying for a shot in the more prestigious, nationally covered tournament.

Initially, it comes across as a standard matchup between the two, with Art on a losing streak and his wife/coach Tashi (Zendaya) choosing the tournaments and opponents. Meanwhile, Patrick has his card declined for a cheap motel room and sleeps in his car before the game. What starts as a matchup seemingly just about the sport and competition quickly and gradually is stripped and redressed throughout flashbacks into a bitter, personal rivalry where some of these people can’t stand looking at each other, let alone talking to each other

13 years ago, Art and Patrick were childhood best friends in the equivalent of Beavis and Butthead if they were charismatically horny 18-year-olds (considering one of them is blonde and the other is dark-haired, the only thing that’s missing are the band T-shirts) but talented at something. They found themselves practically drooling over Tashi, a prodigy college tennis player with the skill to become famous, make her family rich, and start a foundational charity. Their obsession also came down to polar opposite reasons; one became romantically infatuated, the other more of an open relationship type, lusting after, well, the beauty of Zendaya. As much as it is about this friendship falling apart and fighting over her affection, Challengers is also very much about the internal feelings Tashi has about those perceptions and what she wants from her life and these men across the years.

To call the dynamics between each character relationship thorny would still be an understatement, as Challengers piles layers on top of itself. Even when the flashbacks reach the pivotal career-ending injury for Tashi, her character and performance from Zendaya don’t lose a domineering edge. She is still in control, if not more so than when she was younger, slyly slipping her face away from a three-way make-out session, leaving Art and Patrick kissing each other. It is a slightly frustrating creative choice to sideline Tashi from the action on the court, although a more conventional film would turn the film and character into something supportive and sappy. Luca Guadagnino (working from a dense, rich screenplay from Justin Kuritzkes) doubles down on intricate power dynamics, scorching sexual tension, and the subtle, endlessly tantalizing psychological mind-bend of what these characters ultimately want from each other and what the endgame is for each of their actions.

It’s a no-brainer that the tennis sequences would be livened up through the score by Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross, but it is also pleasantly surprising and immensely effective that the dialogue also feels supercharged by these upbeat tempo swings, pulsating thumps, and scratchy sounds. There is a scene between Art and Patrick in a sauna, naturally drenched in sweat, but the score accomplishes that same feeling for the viewer. Not to break out the old cliché, but the score becomes a character, driving and adding context to a war of words between these characters and their shifting alignments.

Advertisement

If the seamless transitions between past and 2019, tight pacing, and kinetic depiction of tennis weren’t enough, Challengers also features an insane climactic shot following one of those balls in real time as it whacked around and upside down, similar to us watching this thorny, arguably toxic love triangle. It’s an impossible film to digest in one viewing, character-driven with some seriously dazzling style. If Tashi views the art of tennis as a relationship, perhaps Luca Guadagnino feels the same about cinema. This recent sizzling streak he is on proves him to be a modern-day great at his craft.

Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ ★ ★ ★ / Movie: ★ ★ ★ ★ ★

Robert Kojder is a member of the Chicago Film Critics Association and the Critics Choice Association. He is also the Flickering Myth Reviews Editor. Check here for new reviews, follow my Twitter or Letterboxd, or email me at MetalGearSolid719@gmail.com

Advertisement

 

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: Paul Feig’s ‘The Housemaid’ is a twisty horror-thriller with nudity and empowerment – Sentinel Colorado

Published

on

Movie Review: Paul Feig’s ‘The Housemaid’ is a twisty horror-thriller with nudity and empowerment – Sentinel Colorado

Santa left us a present this holiday season and it is exactly what we didn’t know we needed: A twisty, psychological horror-thriller with nudity that’s all wrapped up in an empowerment message.

“The Housemaid” is Paul Feig’s delicious, satirical look at the secret depravity of the ultra-rich, but it’s so well constructed that’s it’s not clear who’s naughty or nice. Halfway through, the movie zigs and everything you expected zags.

It’s almost impossible to thread the line between self-winking campy — “That’s a lot of bacon. Are you trying to kill us?” — and carving someone’s stomach with a broken piece of fine china, yet Feig and screenwriter Rebecca Sonnenshine do.

Sydney Sweeney stars as a down-on-her luck Millie Calloway, a gal with a troubled past living out of her car who answers an ad for a live-in housekeeper in a tony suburb of New York City. Her resume is fraudulent, as are her references.

Advertisement

Somehow, the madam of the mansion, Nina Winchester played with frosty excellence by Amanda Seyfried in pearls and creamy knits, takes a shine to this young soul. “I have a really good feeling about this, Millie,” she says in that perky, slightly crazed clipped way that Seyfried always slays with. “This is going to be fun, Millie.”

Maybe not for Millie, but definitely for us. The young housekeeper gets her own room in the attic — weird that it closes with a deadbolt from the outside, but no matter — and we’re off. Mille gets a smartphone with the family’s credit card preloaded and a key for that deadbolt. “What kind of monsters are we?” asks Nina. Indeed.

The next day, the house is a mess when the housekeeper comes down and Seyfried is in a wide-eyed, crashing-plates, full-on psychotic rage. The sweet, supportive woman we met the day before is gone. But her hunky husband (Brandon Sklenar) is helpful and apologetic. And smoldering. Uh-oh. Did we mention he’s hunky?

If at first we understand that the housekeeper is being a little manipulative — lying to get the job, for instance, or wearing glasses to seem more serious — we soon realize that all kinds of gaslighting games are being played behind these gates, and they’re much more impactful.

Based on Freida McFadden’s novel, “The Housemaid” rides waves of manipulation and then turns the tables on what we think we’ve just seen, looking at male-female power structures and how privilege can trap people without it.

Advertisement

The film is as good looking as the actors, with nifty touches like having the main house spare, well-lit and bright, while the husband’s private screening room in the basement is done in a hellish red. There are little jokes throughout, like the husband and the housemaid bonding over old episodes of “Family Feud,” with the name saying it all.

Feig and his team also have fun with horror movie conventions, like having a silent, foreboding groundskeeper, adding a creepy dollhouse and placing lightning and thunder during a pivotal scene. They surround the mansion with fussy, aristocratic PTA moms who have tea parties and say things like “You know what yoga means to me.”

Feig’s fascinating combination of gore, torture and hot sex ends happily, capped off with Taylor Swift’s perfectly conjured “I Did Something Bad” playing over the end credits. Not at all: This naughty movie is definitely on the nice list.

“The Housemaid,” a Lionsgate release that’s in theaters Friday, is rated R by the Motion Picture Association for strong bloody violence, gore, language, sexuality/nudity and drug use. Running time: 131 minutes. Three and a half stars out of four.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘The Spongebob Movie: Search for Squarepants’ Review: Adventure Romp Soaks up a Good Time for SpongeBob Fans of All Ages

Published

on

‘The Spongebob Movie: Search for Squarepants’ Review: Adventure Romp Soaks up a Good Time for SpongeBob Fans of All Ages

I’m convinced that each SpongeBob movie released on the big screen serves as a testament to the current state of the series. The 2004 film was a send-off for the early series run. Sponge Out of Water symbolized the Paul Tibbitt era, and Sponge on the Run served as a major transitional period between soft reboot and spin-off setup. The team responsible for Search for SquarePants, which consists of current showrunners Marc Ceccarelli and Vince Waller, as well as the seasoned Kaz, is showcasing their comedic and absurdist abilities. The sole purpose of the film is to elicit laughter with its distinctively silly and irreverent, whimsical humor. More so than its predecessor, it creates a mindless romp. Granted, there are far too many butt-related jokes, to a weird degree.

Truthfully, I am apprehensive about the insistence of each SpongeBob movie being CG-animated. However, Drymon, who directed the final Hotel Transylvania film, Transformania, brings the series’ quirky, outrageous 2D-influenced poses and expressive style into a 3D space. Its CG execution, done by Texas-based Reel FX (Book of Life, Rumble, Scoob), is far superior to Mikros Animation’s Sponge on the Run, which, despite its polish, has experimental frame rate issues with the comic timing and is influenced by The Spider-Verse. FX encapsulates the same fast, frenetic pace in its absurdist humor, which enables a significant number of the jokes to be effective and feel like classic SpongeBob.

With lovely touches like gorgeous 2D artwork in flashback scenes and mosaic backgrounds during multiple action shots, Drymon and co expand the cinematic scope, enhancing its theatrical space. Taking on a darker, if not more obscene, tone in the main underworld setting, the film’s purple- and green-infused visual palette adds a unique shine that sets it apart from other Sponge-features. Its strong visual aesthetic preserves the SpongeBob identity while capturing the spirit of swashbuckling and satisfying a Pirates of the Caribbean void in the heart.

The film’s slapstick energy is evident throughout, as it’s purposefully played as a romp. The animators’ hilarious antics, which make the most of each set piece to a comical degree, feel like the ideal old-fashioned love letter to the new adults who grew up with SpongeBob and are now introducing it to their kids. This is a perfect bridge. There’s a “Twelfth Street Rag” needle drop in a standout montage sequence that will have older viewers astral projecting with joy. 

Search for SquarePants retreads water but with a charming swashbuckling freshness.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: ‘The SpongeBob Movie: Search for SquarePants’ – Catholic Review

Published

on

Movie Review: ‘The SpongeBob Movie: Search for SquarePants’ – Catholic Review

NEW YORK (OSV News) – Cartoon characters can devolve into dullards over time. But some are more enduringly appealing than others, as the adventure “The SpongeBob Movie: Search for SquarePants” (Paramount) proves.

Yellow, absorbent and porous on the outside, unflaggingly upbeat SpongeBob (voice of Tom Kenny) is childlike and anxious to please within. He also displays the kind of eagerness for grown-up experiences that is often found in real-life youngsters but that gets him into trouble in this fourth big-screen outing for his character.

Initially, his yearning for maturity takes a relatively harmless form. Having learned that he is now exactly 36 clams tall, the requisite height to ride the immense roller coaster at Captain Booty Beard’s Fun Park, he determines to do so.

Predictably, perhaps, he finds the ride too scary for him. This prompts Mr. Krabs (voice of Clancy Brown), the owner of the Krusty Krab — the fast-food restaurant where SpongeBob works as a cook — to inform his chef that he is still an immature bubble-blowing boy who needs to be tested as a swashbuckling adventurer.

The opportunity for such a trial soon arises with the appearance of the ghostly green Flying Dutchman (voice of Mark Hamill), a pirate whose elaborately spooky lair, the Underworld, is adjacent to SpongeBob’s friendly neighborhood, Bikini Bottom. Subject to a curse, the Dutchman longs to lift it and return to human status.

Advertisement

To do so, he needs to find someone both innocent and gullible to whom he can transfer the spell. SpongeBob, of course, fits the bill.

So the buccaneer lures SpongeBob, accompanied by his naive starfish pal Patrick (voice of Bill Fagerbakke), into a series of challenges designed to prove that the lad has what it takes. Mr. Krabs, the restaurateur’s ill-tempered other employee, Squidward (voice of Rodger Bumpass), and SpongeBob’s pet snail, Gary, all follow in pursuit.

Along the way, SpongeBob and Patrick’s ingenuity and love of carefree play usually succeed in thwarting the Dutchman’s plans.

As with most episodes of the TV series, which premiered on Nickelodeon in 1999, there are sight gags intended either for adults or savvy older children. This time out, though, director Derek Drymon and screenwriters Pam Brady and Matt Lieberman produce mostly misfires.

These include an elaborate gag about Davy Jones’ legendary locker — which, after much buildup, turns out to be an ordinary gym locker. Additionally, in moments of high stress, SpongeBob expels what he calls “my lucky brick.” As euphemistic poop gags go, it’s more peculiar than naughty.

Advertisement

True to form, SpongeBob emerges from his latest escapades smarter, wiser, pleased with his newly acquired skills and with increased loyalty to his friends. So, although the script’s humor may often fall short, the franchise’s beguiling charm remains.

The film contains characters in cartoonish peril and occasional scatological humor. The OSV News classification is A-I – general patronage. The Motion Picture Association rating is PG — parental guidance suggested. Some material may not be suitable for children.

Read More Movie & TV Reviews

Copyright © 2025 OSV News

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending