Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Luca Guadagnino – 'Queer' movie review

Published

on

Luca Guadagnino – 'Queer' movie review

Luca Guadagnino – ‘Queer’ review

Nobody has had a better year than Luca Guadagnino – the commercial success of Challengers simultaneously revitalised the erotic thriller and made tennis seem like a vaguely appealing sport. However, I had several qualms with the film (for reasons that I won’t get into), but mostly because it felt like a story with no substance, which is very much in contrast to the nuanced emotional layers present in his earlier work. And when I saw that Queer was being sold as a ‘new love story’, I felt tepidly intrigued and wary. But after a less immediate and underwhelming gush of praise towards Queer, I wondered whether that pointed towards a less commercial or palatable story, and after seeing it at the London Film Festival, I felt both disturbed, relieved and thrilled by what I had seen. My theory had been confirmed – Guadagnino had redeemed himself.

As an adaptation of the William Burroughs novel, Queer tells the story of William Lee, a middle-aged expat living in New Mexico whose monotonous and lonely existence is disturbed by the presence of a much younger man called Eugene. While Guadagnino is undoubtedly a master at voicing the many heartaches and pains that come with actually being in a relationship, Queer is the first that explores the deep loneliness of unreciprocated love as someone who is queer, painting it as this deeply fracturing and out of body experience, with William yearning for intimacy but unable to openly express this. 

Advertisement

William spends his time in seedy bars and clubs, sitting in deserted corners as he scans the room for bodies and other silently longing men, searching for validation and scraps of love that could temporarily lift him from the shackles of being unseen. As someone who has built a career on the image of hyper-masculinity, there could be no better man than Daniel Craig to play the William; completely transformed from his usual aura of effortless charm to being haunting and pitifully desperate as he skulks the streets in search of human connection and everything that lies between the cracks. He awkwardly tries to meet the gaze of the men around him; looking for an unspoken acknowledgement of attraction as he locks eyes with each stranger, painfully viewing every loaded glance and gesture as the one to finally save him. He intensely pines for anything that vaguely resembles attention, with his eyes burning holes into everyone that meets his gaze.

It captures the suffocating loneliness of being queer in a place where your identity has to be discreet, trying to communicate your humanity through a lingering touch and hoping that someone will silently understand while most recoil and are repulsed by the implications of your existence.   

After meeting Eugene, William becomes completely infatuated by the idea of being close to him, meek and unsure of himself as he tries to express his desires through coded glances and awkward gestures, anxiously asking for reassurance from his one queer friend on whether or not Eugene is one of them. “I want to talk to you, without speaking”, he finally says, mustering the courage to boldly express the feeling that is usually silenced.

Despite Eugene’s cryptic response that reveals little about the hidden depths William suspects they both share, the two begin spending time together, even when it is clear that Eugene doesn’t care for him in the same way. Drew Starkey is hypnotic in the role, drawing you in with his stoic demeanour and sinister silence, leaving you feeling as mesmerised and frantic as William, whose feverish infatuation only grows the longer it goes unreciprocated. His obsession slowly becomes an addiction, unable to tell between healthy and unhealthy desires, and he loses himself in a delusional hope that engulfs him entirely. Through the use of eerie and slightly grotesque dream sequences, we see William’s inner world as the line between fantasy and reality fades, dreaming of a hand that will graze his knee or lightly brush over his ribcage, wanting something so pure and simple that it feels cruel when you realise it isn’t possible.

Queer is perhaps Guadgnino’s most experimental film to date, and he masterfully uses this jarring tonal style to explore queerness as a surrealist experience that slowly twists you into a disembodied figure, with William’s image being likened to that of a centipede, with nauseating sequences of bugs that crawl across bed sheets and skin, comparing his existence to that of an insect. The surrealism comes from the intense alienation of being treated as ‘other’ by the people around him for daring to express his need of wanting to be loved/seen, becoming a discombobulated and ghost-like figure that has been dehumanised as a result of his queerness.

Advertisement

The Italian director goes against the lush romanticism he is known for by creating a grimy and uncomfortable visual style in his portrait of loneliness and desperation, which is only slightly hindered in some scenes by the slightly dodgy visual effects. However, whatever is lacking in the visual effects is made up for in the incredibly visceral and unnerving sound design, with a horror-like score being used during the love scenes to play on the idea that William’s sexuality is perverse and something to be feared, with a raw undercurrent of danger pulsing through each interaction with Eugene. The needle drops are no exception, with Sinéad O’Connor’s ‘All Apologies’ setting the tone during the opening credits, with one mesmerising use of Nirvana’s ‘Come As You Are’ while Craig haunts the streets.

William hides his lack of fulfilment behind a facade of joviality, but despite this, he continuously tells people that he feels ‘disembodied’. After watching Guadagnino’s haunting odyssey of delusion and dehumanisation, you too will feel fragmented and broken, devastated by Wiliam’s innocent pursuit of connection as he turns himself inside out to be accepted, going to each far corner of the world to make himself worthy for the one he loves.

Related Topics

Subscribe To The Far Out Newsletter

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Film Review: “Pitfall” – MediaMikes

Published

on

Film Review: “Pitfall” – MediaMikes

Starring: Marshall Williams, Richard Harmon and Alex Essoe
Directed by: James Kondelik
Rated: NR
Running Time: 108 minutes

Our Score: 1.5 out of 5 Stars

Survival horror is the ultimate guilty pleasure because you can amplify any life-or-death situation into the paranormal, horrific, thrilling, or cruelly dramatic extremes it finds itself in. So why doesn’t “Pitfall” come close to tickling “The Ritual,” “The Blair Witch Project,” or “Wolf Creek” vibes?

Woods and grief feel like a ritualistic trope at this point as “Pitfall” opens on Scott (Marshall Williams) and Ashley (Alex Essoe) mourning the death of their parents. For reasons that may or may not be revealed later, they join three friends on an ominous trip that quickly introduces the titular pitfall, a massive trap designed to kill prey.

The movie constantly battles convention with unpredictability. The problem is that at more than 100 minutes long, there’s plenty of time to sit around and wonder where the story is heading. If “Pitfall” moved with the frantic pace of a Tuesday afternoon soap opera on meth, maybe I’d be swept up in the chaos. Instead, I found myself waiting for reveals that felt more eye-rolling than shocking.

Advertisement

I really wanted to like “Pitfall” because of how invested it is in physical violence, emotional trauma, and psychological brutality. Unfortunately, the movie never convinced me it knew what to do with those ideas. By the time it arrives at its revelations and ultimate purpose, “Pitfall” feels less like a title and more like a review.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

The Breadwinner (Christian Movie Review) – The Collision

Published

on

The Breadwinner (Christian Movie Review) – The Collision

About the Film 

Advertisement

On the Surface

For Consideration

Advertisement

Advertisement

Beneath The Surface

Engage The Film

Family Dynamics

Advertisement

  • Daniel holds a PhD in “Christianity and the Arts” from The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. He is the author/co-author of multiple books and he speaks in churches and schools across the country on the topics of Christian worldview, apologetics, creative writing, and the Arts.

    Advertisement

    View all posts


Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Blast’ movie review: An unlikely family packs a punch in this largely gripping but patchy film

Published

on

‘Blast’ movie review: An unlikely family packs a punch in this largely gripping but patchy film

A Karate master father, a homemaker mother, and a pharmacist uncle. The life of IT professional Nila (a fantastic Preity Mukundhan) seems quite simple and benevolent — she goes to her office, plays video games on her mobile, and spends time in her uncle’s medical shop, grudgingly looking at an old television set he refuses to let go. Nila’s life, to an unassuming viewer, may not seem anything too extraordinary. Still, one key piece of information reveals that perhaps this must be the kind of ‘family life’ backdrop that most assuredly camouflages a superhero origin story. Nila isn’t just any other ordinary human, and neither is that Karate master, homemaker, or pharmacist. Blast, directed by Subash K Raj, is a martial arts actioner pegged around one very potent Drishyam-esque idea — what if a family of martial arts pros is forced to step out of their normal lives to fight against injustice when nefarious men find their door? And director Subash comes off in flying colours by conceptualising a terrific set-up that makes use of this idea.

The beating heart of the story is Preity Mukundhan’s Nila, who avoids becoming a merely gender-swapped routine action hero. There’s real moral and emotional backing to why Preity is the way she is, and Subash allows her the time to make her case. Nila’s quest started when she was a child. As she fumed with rage due to a ragging incident, her father, Rajaram (Arjun), told her, “fight back if you are in the right” and “fight against injustice even if the victims are strangers.”

Preity Mukundhan in a still from ‘Blast’

Preity Mukundhan in a still from ‘Blast’
| Photo Credit:
Special Arrangement

And the introductory scene to the now-grown-up Nila’s bravado is inherently gripping. A goon is sent flying into a rowdy’s den, and a perplexed henchman walks out to find the “man who hit” his colleague, urging Nila to step aside, because it can’t be a woman, isn’t it? Nila enters, and so does mayhem. In fact, one of the smartest choices Subash makes is in how he retains this inherent, normalised sexism in how the men see Nila throughout. In a later instance, a villain looks past Rajaram and Nila because they seem like an ordinary father and daughter. Where Subash takes a misstep is in how he treats a sexual harassment arc featuring Nila and her abusive manager; it makes way for a good masala cinema moment, but Subash laces it with humour, and it neither reveals anything new nor does it seem to care to extend the idea that the world Nila lives in is already calibrated to look down on women and feast on their vulnerabilities. Also, you begin to get slightly impatient as the film keeps revelling in the idea that a woman is bringing all the action — when will the conflict arise?

Blast (Tamil)

Director: Subash K Raj

Cast: Preity Mukundhan, Arjun, Abhirami, Vivek Prasanna

Runtime: 144 minutes

Advertisement

Storyline: A fiercesome woman, along with her martial artist parents, vows to take down a corrupt syndicate

Nila constantly gets into trouble as she refuses to bow down in the face of injustice, to the pride of her father, but to the dismay of her mother, Neelaveni (Abhirami, too, can kick some bottoms). And it doesn’t take much to guess where the setting is headed. We simultaneously begin to follow the making of a Black Opal mining scam that an evil businessman, Varun Dhayalan (John Kokken), is spearheading. The project, which puts the hillside village of Keelakadu in danger, would bring in ₹7000 crores worth of minerals, of which a minister (PL Thenappan) takes ₹1000 crores. This whole arc operates like a rather convoluted spiral of villainy — helping Varun move the money needed to bribe the minister is a dreaded assassin named Abraham (Arjun Chidambaram), and helping Abraham is a gangster named Kirubhakaran (Pawan), and under him works a henchman whose friend is a low-life chain snatcher, Toby (Vinod Sagar), and Toby gets caught in a station where Inspector Arunagiri (Dileepan) is investigating Abraham’s identity, and under Arunagiri works a corrupt cop who wants Kirubha’s help to save his job. I guess you could already see where Blast might have derailed.

A lion’s share of screentime is accorded to explain each step in this often yawn-inducing villain saga, all while you are patiently waiting to see the tip of the whirlpool land on Nila’s doorstep and suck her martial arts family in. When it does, it is as explosive as you expect, at least until the intermission mark. While these unidimensional villains test your patience — only Arjun Chidambaram is written and presented with flair — you are left waiting for the next high moment, especially since Subash seems to have a knack for staging such mass-y scenes. But again, how much can Preity and Arjun do when the writing begins to dip into cliches and conveniences? After a point, Blast turns out to be quite tedious in the final act, making you wonder how a leaner, crisper, and more anchored screenplay could have been.

Arjun and Abhirami in a still from ‘Blast’

Arjun and Abhirami in a still from ‘Blast’
| Photo Credit:
Special Arrangement

All that aside, however, what truly fascinates one is how, despite Blast being helmed by a male director and starring an action star like Arjun, it moves around its female protagonist, Nila, and every major decision is made keeping the two central women as opposing but counterbalancing poles — Neelaveni’s moral anchor prioritising the family’s peaceful life above all, and Nila’s moral anchor pushing them to be knights of justice. In fact, even in one of the most pivotal moments of the film, the choice to decide a villain’s fate is placed rightfully on Nila’s shoulders. It is great to see Arjun take a step back to let Abhirami and Preity shine, while Vivek Prasanna, as Nila’s pharmacist uncle, gets a Jailer-esque moment that is sure to become a highlight in his career. Helping all of them are the able technicians, be it the sharp, slick cinematography, innovative and adrenaline-pumping action choreography, and Ravi Basrur’s assured music choices.

That said, Blast is a Preity Mukundhan show all along, and the Star-actor knows how to pack a punch, alright! In a different film, where more ingenious ideas are spring-loaded for mass elevations, Blast would have truly become her career-defining big bang.

Advertisement

Blast is currently running in theatres

Published – May 29, 2026 02:50 pm IST

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending