Connect with us

Entertainment

Inside Christine McVie’s and Stevie Nicks’ decades-long friendship | CNN

Published

on

Inside Christine McVie’s and Stevie Nicks’ decades-long friendship | CNN



CNN
 — 

All through the varied private turmoils for which the members of Fleetwood Mac are recognized, one relationship buoyed the band for many years: the friendship between its two frontwomen, Christine McVie and Stevie Nicks.

McVie joined the band in 1970 throughout one in all its early lineup modifications and for years was its solely lady. When Nicks was added to the lineup in 1975, the 2 turned quick buddies.

Theirs was not a aggressive relationship, however a sisterly one – each girls had been gifted songwriters chargeable for crafting most of the band’s best-known tunes. Although the 2 grew aside within the Eighties amid Nicks’ worsening drug habit and the band’s rising inside rigidity, they got here again collectively when McVie returned to Fleetwood Mac in 2014.

At a live performance in London, shortly earlier than McVie formally rejoined the band, Nicks devoted the track “Landslide” to her “mentor. Large sister. Greatest pal.” And on the present’s finish, McVie was there, accompanying her bandmates for “Don’t Cease.”

Advertisement

“I by no means need her to ever exit of my life once more, and that has nothing to do with music and every little thing to do along with her and I as buddies,” Nicks informed the Minneapolis Star-Tribune in 2015.

On Wednesday, McVie, the band’s “songbird,” died after a quick sickness at age 79. Under, revisit McVie’s and Nicks’ years-long relationship as bandmates, finest buddies and “sisters.”

The story of Nicks becoming a member of Fleetwood Mac is legend now: Band founder and drummer Mick Fleetwood wished to recruit guitarist Lindsey Buckingham, who stipulated that he would solely be part of if his girlfriend and musician Nicks may be part of, too. McVie solid the deciding vote, and the remainder is historical past.

“It was vital that I received on along with her as a result of I’d by no means performed with one other lady,” McVie informed the Guardian in 2013. “However I preferred her immediately. She was humorous and good but in addition there was no competitors. We had been fully completely different on the stage to one another and we wrote in a different way too.”

Advertisement

All through the band’s many private problems – McVie married and divorced Fleetwood Mac bassist John McVie and had an affair with the band’s lighting director, whereas Nicks had rollercoaster romances with Buckingham and Fleetwood – they had been one another’s heart.

“To be in a band with one other lady who was this wonderful musician – (McVie) form of immediately turned my finest pal,” Nicks informed the New Yorker earlier this 12 months. “Christine was an entire different ballgame. She preferred hanging out with the fellows. She was simply extra comfy with males than I had ever been.”

The 2 protected one another, Nicks stated, in a male-dominated trade: “We made a pact, within the very starting, that we’d by no means be handled with disrespect by all of the male musicians in the neighborhood.

“I’d say to her, ‘Collectively, we’re a critical drive of nature, and it’ll give us the power to maneuver the waters which can be forward of us,’” Nicks informed the New Yorker.

“Rumours” was the band’s biggest success so far when it was launched in 1977. However the band’s relationships with one another had been deteriorating, save for the one between McVie and Nicks. Whereas the pair had been enduring breakups with their vital others, Nicks and McVie spent their time offstage collectively.

Advertisement

The Guardian requested McVie if she was making an attempt to offset the band’s tumult along with her songs on “Rumours,” together with the lighthearted “You Make Lovin’ Enjoyable” and optimistic “Don’t Cease.” She stated she probably had been.

As a number of members’ drug use intensified, the band’s dynamic grew tense. McVie distanced herself from the group in 1984 amid her bandmates’ addictions, telling the Guardian she was “simply sick of it.” Nicks, in the meantime, was turning into depending on cocaine.

After Fleetwood Mac was inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame in 1998, Christine McVie (third from left) quit the band.

McVie informed Rolling Stone that 12 months that she’d grown other than Nicks: “She appears to have developed her personal fantasy world, by some means, which I’m not a part of. We don’t socialize a lot.”

In 1986, Nicks checked into the Betty Ford Middle to deal with her habit, although she later turned hooked on Klonopin, which she stated claimed years of her life. She give up the prescription drug within the Nineties.

After recording some solo works, McVie returned to Fleetwood Mac for his or her 1987 album “Tango within the Evening,” and two of her songs on that file – “Little Lies” and “In every single place” – turned main hits. However Nicks departed the band quickly after, and the band’s best-known lineup wouldn’t formally reunite till 1997 for “The Dance” tour and subsequent reside album.

Advertisement

The reunion was short-lived: After the band was inducted into the Rock & Roll Corridor of Fame in 1998, McVie formally give up Fleetwood Mac, citing a worry of flying and exhaustion of life on the street.

Within the 2010s, after greater than a decade of retirement, McVie toyed with returning to performing. She formally rejoined Fleetwood Mac after calling Fleetwood himself and gauging what her return would imply for the group.

“Thankfully Stevie was dying for me to return again, as had been the remainder of the band,” she informed the Arts Desk.

In 2015, a 12 months after she’d rejoined Fleetwood Mac, McVie hit the street along with her bandmates. Touring with the group was tiring however enjoyable, the primary time they’d carried out collectively in years.

“I’m solely right here for Stevie,” she informed the New Yorker that 12 months.

Advertisement
Christine McVie (left) and Stevie Nicks perform together at Radio City Music Hall in 2018.

Nicks concurred: “Once we went on the street, I noticed what a tremendous pal she’d been of mine that I had misplaced and didn’t notice the entire penalties of it until now,” she informed the Minneapolis Star-Tribune in 2015.

Throughout that tour, McVie wore a silver chain that Nicks had given her – a “metaphor,” McVie informed the New Yorker, “that the chain of the band won’t ever be damaged. Not by me, in any case. Not once more by me.”

McVie informed the Arts Desk in 2016 that she and Nicks had been “higher buddies now than (they) had been 16 years in the past.”

Touring with Buckingham and Fleetwood may rapidly get tumultuous for Nicks, McVie stated, as a consequence of their shared historical past. “However with me in there, it gave Stevie the possibility to get her breath again and never have this fixed factor occurring with Lindsey: her sister was again,” she stated.

Their mutual reward continued: In 2019, McVie stated Nicks was “simply unbelievable” onstage: “The extra I see her carry out on stage the higher I feel she is. She holds the fort.”

Advertisement

When their 2018-2019 tour ended, although – with out Buckingham, who was fired – the band “form of broke up,” McVie informed Rolling Stone earlier this 12 months. She added that she didn’t converse with Nicks as typically as she did once they toured collectively.

As for a reunion, McVie informed Rolling Stone that whereas it wasn’t off the desk, she wasn’t feeling “bodily up for it.”

“I’m getting a bit lengthy within the tooth right here,” she stated. “I’m fairly pleased being at dwelling. I don’t know if I ever need to tour once more. It’s bloody laborious work.”

Information of McVie’s demise rattled Nicks, who wrote that she had solely discovered McVie was sick days earlier. She referred to as McVie her “finest pal in the entire world because the first day of 1975.”

On her social media accounts, Nicks shared a handwritten be aware containing lyrics from the Haim track “Hallelujah,” a few of which discusses grief and the lack of a finest pal.

Advertisement

“See you on the opposite facet, my love,” Nicks wrote. “Don’t overlook me – All the time, Stevie.”

Movie Reviews

Film offers 'Hard Truths' about why some people are happy — and others are miserable

Published

on

Film offers 'Hard Truths' about why some people are happy — and others are miserable

Marianne Jean-Baptiste, left, and Michele Austin play sisters in Hard Truths.

Bleecker Street


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Bleecker Street

In the many beautifully observed working-class dramedies he’s made over the past five decades, the British writer and director Mike Leigh has returned again and again to one simple yet endlessly resonant question: Why are some people happy, while others are not? Why does Nicola, the sullen 20-something in Leigh’s 1990 film, Life Is Sweet, seem incapable of even a moment’s peace or pleasure? By contrast, how does Poppy, the upbeat heroine of Leigh’s 2008 comedy, Happy-Go-Lucky, manage to greet every misfortune with a smile?

Leigh’s new movie, Hard Truths, could have been titled Unhappy-Go-Lucky. It follows a middle-aged North London misanthrope named Pansy, who’s played, in the single greatest performance I saw in 2024, by Marianne Jean-Baptiste.

You might know Jean-Baptiste from Leigh’s wonderful 1996 film, Secrets & Lies, in which she played a shy, unassuming London optometrist seeking out her birth mother. But there’s nothing unassuming about Pansy, who leads a life of seething, unrelenting misery. She spends most of her time indoors, barking orders and insults at her solemn husband, Curtley, and their 22-year-old son, Moses.

Advertisement

Pansy keeps a spotless home, but the blank walls and sparse furnishings are noticeably devoid of warmth, cheer or personality. When she isn’t cleaning, she’s trying to catch up on sleep, complaining about aches, pains and exhaustion. Sometimes she goes out to shop or run errands, only to wind up picking fights with the people she meets: a dentist, a salesperson, a stranger in a parking lot.

Back at home, she unloads on Curtley and Moses about all the indignities she’s been subjected to and the general idiocy of the world around her. Pansy has an insult comedian’s ferocious wit and killer timing. While you wouldn’t necessarily want to bump into her on the street, she makes for mesmerizing, even captivating on-screen company.

Leigh is often described as a Dickensian filmmaker, and for good reason; he’s a committed realist with a gift for comic exaggeration. Like nearly all Leigh’s films, Hard Truths emerged from a rigorous months-long workshop process, in which the director worked closely with his actors to create their characters from scratch. As a result, Jean-Baptiste’s performance, electrifying as it is, is also steeped in emotional complexity; the more time we spend with Pansy, the more we see that her rage against the world arises from deep loneliness and pain.

Leigh has little use for plot; he builds his stories from the details and detritus of everyday life, drifting from one character to the next. Tuwaine Barrett is quietly heartbreaking as Pansy’s son, Moses, who isolates himself and spends his time either playing video games or going on long neighborhood walks. Pansy’s husband, Curtley, is harder to parse; he’s played by the terrific David Webber, with a passivity that’s both sympathetic and infuriating.

The most significant supporting character is Pansy’s younger sister, Chantelle, played by the luminous Michele Austin, another Secrets & Lies alumn. Chantelle could scarcely be more different from her sister: She’s a joyous, contented woman with two adult daughters of her own, and she does everything she can to break through to Pansy. In the movie’s most affecting scene, Chantelle drags her sister to a cemetery to pay their respects to their mother, whose sudden death five years ago, we sense, is at the core of Pansy’s unhappiness.

Advertisement

At the same time, Leigh doesn’t fill in every blank; he’s too honest a filmmaker to offer up easy explanations for why people feel the way they feel. His attitude toward Pansy — and toward all the prickly, outspoken, altogether marvelous characters he’s given us — is best expressed in that graveside scene, when Chantelle wraps her sister in a tight hug and tells her, with equal parts exasperation and affection: “I don’t understand you, but I love you.”

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Convicted 'American Nightmare' rapist pleads guilty to two more home invasions

Published

on

Convicted 'American Nightmare' rapist pleads guilty to two more home invasions

Matthew Muller, the notorious kidnapper whose most infamous crime was detailed in the Netflix documentary “American Nightmare,” appeared Friday in court and pleaded guilty to two additional crimes.

Wearing a brown Santa Clara County jail uniform, Muller, 47, replied with a taciturn series of “yes” answers as Superior Court Judge Cynthia A. Sevely confirmed he was admitting guilt in two home invasions in 2009. In both cases, Muller broke into homes in the early hours, bound his female victims and attempted to drug and sexually assault them.

In total, Muller is now suspected or convicted in at least six violent crimes, beginning when he was 16.

“This extremely dangerous person left a trail of traumatized and terrified victims,” Dist. Atty. Jeff Rosen said. “It took the collective courage of his victims and determined law enforcement officers to stop him. This nightmare is over.”

The Santa Clara charges against Muller came about as a result of the work of an unlikely team of law enforcement officers and the two victims in the Vallejo case, Denise Huskins and Aaron Quinn. Over the last 10 months, the pair said, they obtained clues about the crimes — and even confessions — from Muller before approaching local authorities with jurisdiction in the incidents.

Advertisement

“We knew there was more to this from the beginning, and clearly how things were handled from the beginning led to a lot of errors,” Huskins said in an interview last week. “We didn’t really have anyone in law enforcement that we trusted and we felt were doing this case justice.”

The first Santa Clara County incident took place on Sept. 29, 2009, when a Mountain View woman in her 30s told police she awoke to find a man on top of her. According to a description of the case from the Santa Clara County district attorney’s office, Muller demanded she drink a medicated beverage, then tied her up and said he was going to rape her.

The woman was able to persuade him to stop his assault, according to the district attorney’s office. Before leaving, Muller allegedly told her that she should get a dog for protection.

About three weeks later, on Oct. 18, 2009, a woman in nearby Palo Alto awoke to find Muller on top of her, according to the district attorney’s office. He tied the woman up and forced her to drink Nyquil.

Again, the woman was able to persuade him to stop, according to prosecutors. And again, before leaving, he gave the woman “crime prevention advice,” according to the district attorney’s office.

Advertisement

Last week, Muller was also charged in another new case, in the Contra Costa town of San Ramon, after authorities examined evidence brought to light through Huskins’ and Quinn’s investigative efforts.

After “American Nightmare” came out, Huskins and Quinn were contacted by an unlikely ally: the police chief in the Monterey Bay town of Seaside, Nick Borges. He had seen the documentary and wanted to help.

That Borges had nothing to do with the case didn’t stop him from becoming involved. He invited Huskins and Quinn to speak to law enforcement in Seaside to share their belief that police interrogation methods that focused on Quinn’s guilt had sent the investigation down the wrong road.

Borges also persuaded the detective ultimately responsible for Muller’s arrest, Misty Carausu, to come.

The four met with El Dorado County Dist. Atty. Vern Pierson, who has jurisdiction in the county where Huskins was held captive — and the seeds of a new investigation were planted.

Advertisement

At lunch after the law enforcement conference, Huskins and Quinn told Borges about their frustrations, and a desire to reach out to Muller personally to seek answers. But the couple feared that could present risks. Borges offered to write Muller on their behalf.

Muller wrote back, giving details of other crimes and even legal declarations with confessions.

Armed with the new information, Pierson, who had been working with the FBI and other agencies, in November traveled to Tucson to interview Muller in person. Over two days, according to Pierson, Muller shared more details, including information on a Northern California attack he claimed to have committed when he was 16. That case is still under investigation, Pierson said.

Attorney Anthony Douglas Rappaport, left, speaks at a 2016 news conference with clients Denise Huskins and Aaron Quinn. The couple reached a $2.5-million settlement with the city of Vallejo after police falsely accused them of fabricating Huskins’ kidnapping.

(Sudhin Thanawala / Associated Press)

Advertisement

In Huskins’ case, which the Netflix documentary is based on, Muller broke into her Vallejo home in March 2015 and drugged and bound her and her then-boyfriend, Aaron Quinn. Muller blindfolded them with swim goggles and gave them medicine to make them sleepy. He put headphones on Quinn and played recordings designed to make Quinn think he was dealing with more than one kidnapper.

Muller then put Huskins into Quinn’s car and drove off with her, eventually taking her to his family’s cabin in South Lake Tahoe. He held her there for two days and sexually assaulted her, before driving her across California and releasing her in Huntington Beach.

Initially, Vallejo police dismissed Quinn’s account of his girlfriend being spirited away by a kidnapper — or kidnappers — who put headphones on him and made him drink a substance that made him sleepy. Officers interrogated Quinn for hours, brushing aside his story and theorizing he was behind her disappearance.

When Huskins turned up, police grew more suspicious, questioning how a kidnapping victim could reappear hundreds of miles away wearing sunglasses and carrying an overnight bag.

Advertisement

Huskins “did not act like a kidnapping victim,” retired Vallejo Police Capt. James O’Connell later said in a sworn statement.

Police tried to get Huskins and Quinn to turn on each other and admit there had been no crime, offering immunity to whoever flipped first, according to statements from their family members.

Then, police went public with that sentiment. “There is no evidence to support the claims that this was a stranger abduction or an abduction at all,” Police Lt. Kenny Park said in a statement at the time. “Given the facts that have been presented thus far, this event appears to be an orchestrated event and not a crime.”

However, less than three months later, evidence gathered from a June 5, 2015, home invasion robbery in the Bay Area community of Dublin helped authorities link Muller to the kidnapping. That case led authorities and Carausu, the detective, to the Muller family’s South Lake Tahoe cabin, where they found, among other things, Quinn’s computer, goggles and tape with a strand of long blond hair.

Huskins and Quinn, who later married, sued the Vallejo Police Department for defamation and reached a $2.5-million settlement in 2018.

Advertisement

Muller, a Harvard-educated lawyer and former Marine, pleaded guilty in 2016 to kidnapping Huskins. In 2022, he pleaded guilty to additional charges of sexually assaulting her. Until he was transported to Santa Clara County to face the new charges, he was serving his 40-year sentence at a federal prison in Tucson.

Muller is expected to return to Santa Clara County Superior Court on Feb. 21 for sentencing.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: Almodóvar Ponders Death and the Lives Preceding it from “The Room Next Door”

Published

on

Movie Review:  Almodóvar Ponders Death and the Lives Preceding it from “The Room Next Door”

In his mid ’70s, it’s only natural that the great Spanish filmmaker Pedro Almodóvar should turn his attentions to reflecting on lives lived, and questions of how one wants life to end with his latest film.

But in boiling down and adapting the Sigrid Nunez novel “What Are You Going Through” into “The Room Next Door,” Almodóvar has conjured up the blithe, arid banalities of Woody Allen at his most pretentious. He squanders two Oscar winners and an Emmy winner in a drab, lifeless story in which characters recite passages from poetry and James Joyce from memory and watch Buster Keaton’s silent classic “Seven Chances” as they ponder a planned suicide and melodramatic strings drone on in the score.

All that’s missing are a few mentions of “Mahler”and you’d have yourself a companion piece to any one of a dozen later Allen films, the ones without a laugh or a light moment to recommend them.

Julianne Moore plays Ingrid, a busy, best-selling author of “fictionalized” biographies and non-fiction who learns of an old friend’s cancerous decline from a mutual acquaintance who comes to a book signing.

Martha (Tilda Swinton) was once a combat correspondant. Now she’s in a New York hospital, longing to go home. As booked-up Ingrid — not a “close” friend — sets aside bigger and bigger chunks of her days to take Martha’s calls and visit her once she comes home to her roomy Manhattan flat to recover from her latest treatment, they reminisce over their careers — especially Martha’s.

Advertisement

They talk about “New York in the ’80s,” Martha’s daughter, flashing back to the troubled Vietnam vet father the child never knew and joke about a “shared lover,” and chuckle as they compare “enthusiastic” notes.

Martha also lets on as to how she’s prepped herself for “the end,” and how her “experimental treatment…survival feels almost disappointing.”

When things take a turn, Ingrid is who Martha confides in. She figures that her life of fame won through risk in war zones means “I deserve a good death.” Ingrid’s involvement drifts towards “the ask.” Martha wants to take a “suicide pill.” She wants to do it in Woodstock, in a posher-than-posh AirBnB. And she wants Ingrid in “The Room Next Door” when she does it — for companionship, and for dealing with the legal complexity of what comes after.

Whatever life there was in the Nunez novel seems bleached out of this meandering, claustrophobic melodrama that that Ingrid finds herself trapped in. That “shared lover” (John Turturro) is still in her life, a friend she can confide in and get advice from.

But this extraordinary situation barely takes on the gravitas demanded. Some anecdotes do nothing to illuminate character or this predicament. And the comic possibilities — this is like asking a casual acquaintance of long standing to oh, babysit, dogsit, help you move, co-sign a loan or the like.

Advertisement

Why didn’t Larry David and Jerry Seinfeld ever get around to assisted suicide as an “inconvenience?”

Moore is too good an actress to not let us feel the gut-punch of this turn of events. Swinton, who takes on a cadaverous in the later acts, easily fits our mental picture of a famous female war reporter — flinty, a little butch, blunt about her success and her failings and pragmatic about her goals.

Ingrid’s last goal is to die with dignity, with a writer she trusts perhaps taking an interest in her journals and by extension, her life story. That’s cynical, but letting Ingrid (and the viewer) figure that out had all sorts of dramatic possibilities.

It’s all perfectly high-minded and polished, but all of this could have been treated with more spark than comes across here. The epilogue that comes after a disappointing third act feels like both a stunt and one last let down that a legendary filmmaker delivers in adapting a novel he was either too serious about, or that he didn’t take seriously enough.

Rating: PG-13, suicide, profanity

Advertisement

Cast: Julianne Moore, Tilda Swinton, Alessandro Nivola and John Turturro

Credits: Scripted and directed by Pedro Almodóvar, based on a novel by Sigrid Nunez. A Sony Pictures Classics release.

Running time: 1:43

About Roger Moore

Movie Critic, formerly with McClatchy-Tribune News Service, Orlando Sentinel, published in Spin Magazine, The World and now published here, Orlando Magazine, Autoweek Magazine

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending