Culture
Coaching confidential: Opposing coaches' thoughts on Michigan-Washington
Alabama, Ohio State, Clemson and Georgia’s run of dominance in college football’s signature event might not be over, but it is on hiatus this year. Instead, there’s new blood after Michigan and Washington advanced to the national title game.
Since the BCS began in 1998, neither team has played for a national title.
“This is probably the first time I’ve ever been fired up for a national championship game,” said one coordinator who faced Washington earlier this year. “I’m so fascinated with this game because they’re like two polar opposites going against each other.”
Michigan’s bruising play along the lines and run-heavy offensive style will square off with Washington’s high-flying, pass-first attack at NRG Stadium in Houston on Monday night. The Athletic spoke with 10 head coaches, coordinators and assistants who have faced either Michigan or Washington this season to gauge their thoughts on the matchup, granting them anonymity to discuss both teams candidly.
No coaches leaned toward Michigan or Washington winning big, but a majority picked Washington to win as an underdog. One coach was shocked to learn Michigan was a four-point favorite. But another assistant said Michigan may be the better team in all aspects.
“It’s hard to go against Michigan, but I just think Washington is more battle-tested, and they find a way to do it one more time,” said one head coach.
When Washington has the ball
One place there was no debate: the brilliance of Washington quarterback Michael Penix Jr., who finished second in the Heisman Trophy voting and followed it up with a masterful 430-yard, two-touchdown performance to carry the Huskies to a semifinal victory against Texas.
“Man, you watch enough of the tape on a whole season of his throws, and you’re blown away with the (tight) windows and the touch he throws with,” one head coach said. “It’s rare because to know when and how to throw it with touch like that is remarkable. It’s as accurate as you’ve ever seen.”
Added another head coach, “Penix makes some amazing throws. Some ‘holy smokes’ throws. His ability to decipher and read coverages is pretty special and he’s got that quick release to get it. That is a gift.”
Every coach The Athletic spoke with raved about Penix, even coaches who faced Penix when he wasn’t at his best.
What makes Washington’s offense so effective is the chemistry between Penix and his trio of receivers: Rome Odunze, Jalen McMillan and Ja’Lynn Polk. They were targeted 20 times in the win against Texas and combined for 19 completions, 353 yards and two touchdowns.
“His trigger is so quick,” said one assistant who faced Washington this year. “Offseason seven-on-seven must be insane. The rhythm and chemistry those guys have? Man. This guy has so much trust in these receivers it makes no sense. If you watch the film and you watch it when the ball is released, the receiver isn’t open. He throws guys open. He throws with a bunch of trust. I told our guys we have to stay in phase with them the entire game, all the way down the field. There won’t be indicators the ball is coming.”
GO DEEPER
Michael Penix Jr.’s journey isn’t only about football — it’s overcoming fear
Odunze has 87 catches for 1,553 yards and 13 touchdowns this year, including six catches for 125 yards in the win over Texas. He was a finalist for the Biletnikoff Award, given annually to college football’s best receiver.
“He’s just different. His body control and the way he and Penix are synced up, whether it’s gonna be back-shoulder or over the top, they’re just in such a rhythm,” one head coach said.
Multiple coaches also raved about Washington’s tight sets, which create difficult angles to defend and unique route combinations to scheme receivers open downfield.
Washington is second in the FBS with 39 passing plays longer than 30 yards this season, but it runs the ball just 27.9 times a game. Only six FBS teams, and just two from the Power 5, run it less often.
“I would try to force them to hand the ball off,” said one coordinator who faced the Huskies this season. “But they will throw the ball in man with two high safeties or if you drop eight and still dice you up.”
Added another assistant, “They’ll throw the ball when they shouldn’t throw the ball. I think their game management is suspect, but they find ways to win.”
Two coaches pointed to Oregon as the game when Washington was most committed to its run game. If that happens, they said, an already elite offense becomes truly unstoppable.
Washington’s skill at receiver allows it to often lean on max protect schemes with six or seven blockers, so even if teams blitz, the experienced unit that won the Joe Moore Award this year as the nation’s best offensive line can keep Penix’s pocket clean and allow him to deliver the ball downfield.
“Their offensive tackles, to me, are incredible,” said one head coach. “If you’re gonna beat ’em, I think it’s gotta be on the interior, but you’ve got to be willing to take chances.”
Texas’ defense managed zero sacks against the Huskies in the semifinal win.
Outstanding pocket movement by Michael Penix Jr. to avoid the pressure. Finds Rome Odunze for a chain mover. pic.twitter.com/REN72eNsGa
— Justin M (@JustinM_NFL) January 2, 2024
“(Byron Murphy II) beat his guy so many times, but Penix would side-step and get the ball out. He’s such a good player. Texas couldn’t just play man, and then when they did cover their guys perfectly, they didn’t play the ball. That’s where Michigan will probably be at an advantage, because their DBs play the ball better,” said one assistant.
Another assistant agreed.
“Michigan’s defense is basically just Texas with better DBs,” he said. “Washington’s strength was Texas’ kryptonite. If Washington is going to win this game, they have to do it throwing down the field.”
The Wolverines rank third nationally in opposing passer rating. Texas ranked 49th.
“I think Michigan is gonna win. They just don’t give up big plays,” said one coordinator who faced Michigan this season. “Washington exposed Texas’ DBs. They are not elite DBs playing elite wide receivers. Michigan has elite DBs and an elite D-Line. (Mike Sainristil) is such a good player. He’s everywhere. They’re elite at all three levels. Michigan’s linebackers don’t miss a lot of tackles.”
Pressure is the simplest way to limit any passer’s effectiveness, but doing that against Washington’s front has proven difficult all season. The Huskies have given up just 11 sacks in 14 games. Only four teams have surrendered fewer.
“The other thing I laugh at is, they’re one of the only O-lines along with Oregon State who don’t wear knee braces, and those are the two best offensive lines in the conference,” said one head coach. “I wonder if there’s something to this? These guys are athletic and powerful and can really move.”
Pressuring Penix without leaving the secondary vulnerable is almost impossible. That leaves defenses with one other option, said multiple coaches: Confuse him.
“If I’m Michigan, I’m utilizing a lot of disguises in my coverages. Pre-snap, I want Michael to see Cover 2 but really I’m Cover 3. I want him to see man but at snap, we’re getting into Cover 3, Cover 4. You press those corners, you disguise and you send pressure. That’s what Arizona State did. They were in his head a little bit. He didn’t have time to go through his reads, and it wasn’t as clean as he wanted it to be.”
That 15-7 win over the Sun Devils was the only game this season in which Penix threw more than one interception and one of two games in which he was held without a touchdown pass, and the Huskies didn’t have a pass play longer than 21 yards.
“Michigan is so tough on defense,” said one coordinator who faced the Wolverines this season. “They made Alabama one-dimensional. Their D-line is that good. They made Bama look like an average O-line.”
If Penix, in his sixth year playing college football, can sniff out coverages clearly before the snap and check into a different play, it’s a disaster for defenses.
“They have more Cover 3 zone beaters than you’ve ever seen,” one head coach said. “Schematically, these guys are incredible. I have the utmost respect for them.”
Washington has nine sixth-year players and has now won its last 10 games by 10 points or less. Multiple coaches pointed to a complete lack of panic from the Huskies in tight games this year.
“I do think (Michigan) is physical enough up front to get (Penix) off his spot and good enough on the back end to at least hold disguises and play multiple things, but Washington keeps finding a way,” said one coordinator who faced Washington this season.
GO DEEPER
Washington has spent its season of destiny dancing with late-game disaster
When Michigan has the ball
Coaches agree on one thing: The road map to Michigan’s success on offense is nothing fancy. It’s the skill that has kept them undefeated all season and the strength they turned to on the last 32 plays of their win against Penn State in November:
Run the ball.
It’s not just the Wolverines’ best offense. It’s their best defense against Washington’s best player.
“Michigan should just run it down their throats and just keep Penix off the field,” said one assistant.
Another assistant said it was clear Michigan was physically and mentally tougher than Alabama in the Rose Bowl.
“I don’t think there are many teams in football that are patient enough running the football, but Michigan is,” said one head coach. “They keep proving that. They keep running it at you. No one else in the Pac-12 will do that other than maybe Oregon State. If Texas would’ve (Monday) night, they’d probably have been better off. They were ripping off runs on them.”
Two other coaches said Texas didn’t lean heavily enough on its running game in the loss. The Longhorns ran for 180 yards on 28 carries with three touchdowns.
“You can run the ball on Washington. Texas could. If their backs didn’t fumble, they probably win that game.”
Washington ranks 86th in the FBS in yards per carry allowed.
“Michigan wants to run the ball and get downhill on you,” said one head coach who faced Michigan this year. “They gotta run the ball against Washington and keep (Penix) off the field. Michigan’s defense is really good — their secondary is better than Washington’s — but their offense is gonna be their best defense.”
Michigan quarterback J.J. McCarthy was a divisive topic of discussion among coaches. His play this season left coaches less than fawning, but most were impressed with what he did to help Michigan beat Alabama.
“J.J. hadn’t played that well in a long time, but he played really well against Alabama. I was more scared about him on the move than in the pocket. We tried to keep him in the pocket. He is very fast, and he really throws well on the run,” said one head coach who played Michigan this year. “He can make all these accurate throws from different arm angles. He’s better going to his right but can still hurt you going to his left. He’s deadly to his right.”
McCarthy earned Heisman buzz during the season and was No. 16 in Dane Brugler’s most recent list of the top 50 NFL Draft prospects.
“They have explosive playmakers, but chunk plays? J.J. McCarthy ain’t that guy. I don’t know what Harbaugh is talking about. He’s out of his mind. If you’re freakin’ Kyle Shanahan you might like him, but in college football, I don’t know if he’s gonna get the job done,” said one assistant.
GO DEEPER
Michigan Rose Bowl final thoughts: Blake Corum the receiver, punt return anxiety
Washington’s defensive scheme, led by co-coordinators Chuck Morrell and William Inge, could confuse McCarthy, multiple coaches The Athletic spoke with said.
“They put everybody up at the line and make the quarterback think a little bit. Then he’ll drop everybody into coverage and you don’t know if he’s playing zone or man. He can get creative with disguising,” said one coordinator who faced Washington this year. “He makes it look like a zero pressure where you have to have a lot of conversations as a staff on how you’re going to handle it. He may bluff and drop out. He was making it look like Cover Zero but it was Cover 3 and he’d shoot guys out. He had our QBs in a tough look at times. If you can keep McCarthy guessing, I thought that’s what they did to Ewers. Even when it’s on the (13)-yard line in the last two plays of the game. He was mugged up and made him throw hot. Quinn was throwing fade balls the entire time because he didn’t know if it was a hot pressure or not.”
One assistant pointed to Michigan’s third-down packages with three tight ends as a place the offense has thrived this year. The Wolverines could continue to do so against the Huskies’ defense by bringing the beef.
“They do some really good stuff. They bring (tight end Max Bredeson) in and he creates problems. He’s a stud. We treated him like a fullback. He’s the difference-maker in those packages, and they do some unique stuff with him and all the pre-snap movement they do,” the assistant said. “He’s a great weapon for them. He explodes through contact and is able to keep his feet moving and displace guys.”
So, who’s going to win?
Overall, coaches weren’t certain how the game would play out, though more leaned toward Washington than Michigan. It’s a product, they said, of the contrasting styles the two teams play.
One coach said if Washington can hit big plays early and jump out to a double-digit lead, Michigan’s lack of explosiveness would mean the Wolverines could break their game script and struggle to rally.
Michigan has just 19 plays of longer than 30 yards this season, which ranks 112th nationally.
Georgia and Alabama, facsimiles of one another, are easier to predict. But with the Huskies’ skill position talent going up against Michigan’s dominance on both lines, multiple coaches expected a more fun national title game than some SEC-heavy games in the past where teams had similar schemes.
“It’s one people are going to want to watch,” said one assistant. “There’s a lot of variables.”
(Top photo: Jonathan Bachman / Getty Images)
Culture
Nick Kyrgios and Alex de Minaur, the two poles of Aussie tennis at the Australian Open
MELBOURNE, Australia — Here on the island that was once the center of the men’s tennis world — the land of Laver and Rosewall, Emerson and Newcombe and other gods of the game — the strangest of dynamics has emerged.
The rest of the globe obsesses about Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz. Down here, it’s all about their own tennis yin and yang.
One is a top-10 player who will do whatever he can to avoid controversy, while dedicating every ounce of his energy to the sport. The other is an unranked unicorn, most at home in the middle ring of a three-ring circus. One has ground his way to the edge of the sport’s elite. The other, according to just about every other player and some big names of the past including Goran Ivanisevic and Andy Roddick, has more natural tennis gifts flowing through his veins than anyone on Earth.
The 2025 Australian Open is abuzz with the latest doings of both.
Alex de Minaur, the world No. 8, and Nick Kyrgios, who is back after a two-year battle with knee and wrist injuries, are the headliners for their country at Melbourne Park. Kyrgios emceed the night session on John Cain Arena Monday, before De Minaur headlines Rod Laver Arena, the pantheon of Australian tennis Tuesday night.
They are both celebrities of the moment; they could not be less alike.
Kyrgios has returned to the center of the tennis world as only he can, toting his confidence like a broadsword and swinging it in the direction of anyone he encounters, whether they want to duel or not. He doesn’t even have a ranking after so long out through injury.
Yet although he is at the bottom of the pecking order among his countrymen when it comes to numbers, there is no doubting who fills stadiums. He’s spent much of the past months trolling Sinner, the world No. 1, about his doping case, plastering lurid allegations about conspiracy on social media and filling comments sections with needle emojis. That included posting them in the comments of a fellow Aussie, and son of Lleyton Hewitt, Cruz, who put a photo up of him and Sinner which likely represented the best moment of his tennis life.
Sinner is none too pleased about this, if indirectly. “I don’t think I have to answer this,” he bristled when Kyrgios’ jabs came up in a news conference Friday.
For Kyrgios, wildly talented but always ambivalent about life as a tennis professional — and always willing to turn matches into spectacles with rants at umpires, officials and those seated in his own player box, and taunts towards opponents — it was business as usual.
He has sought more nuance in other areas of his life. In early 2023, Kyrgios pleaded guilty to assaulting his then girlfriend Chiara Passari in 2021, but was not convicted. He has been open about living through depression, and has said that his mental health contributed to his behavior.
“We watch sport because we want personalities,” Kyrgios said Friday. “Every time I step out on court, I don’t know if I’m going to be super-controversial in a good or bad way. Throughout my career, it hasn’t always been good, but it’s added a lot of excitement to the game. I think it’s important.
“There’s so many good players on the tour now. I think there’s not so many contrasting personalities.”
How big a star is Kyrgios around here? He lost his first-round singles match to Jacob Fearnley of Great Britain (like Andy Murray, a Scot) Monday night in straight sets. He was carrying an injury throughout, which made much of the action provisional — and for him, coming back from 18 months out, it may well have been a warm-up act.
He will want to pack stadiums for the doubles, which he will play with his close friend Thanasi Kokkinakis. The duo — known as the “Special Ks” — won the title here in 2022, a run that played to raucous, beered-up crowds that turned the doubles competition into a national happening.
In his post-match news conference after being beaten by Fearnley, Kyrgios made a stronger admission: “I don’t see myself playing singles here again.”
His contrast with de Minaur could not be more stark. Kyrgios is 6 feet 4 inches (193cm) tall, a master of trick shots and creativity with one of the best serves in the world. De Minaur is a good half-foot shorter, and given how slight he is, he presents smaller than that.
Always envied for his unmatched speed, de Minaur spent the first post-pandemic years lurking in the world top 20. He carried the hopes of his country into a fourth-round match against Novak Djokovic here in 2023. Djokovic said he used the moment to take some revenge on Australia for deporting him the previous year, over his refusal to get vaccinated against Covid-19. He annihilated its favorite tennis son, 6-2, 6-1, 6-2.
Then, last May, de Minaur’s career arc veered upwards.
He is half-Spanish and spent much of his childhood there, but has never had much use for clay-court tennis events. He can run like a deer; he can switch directions like a scrambling puppy dog; he has a massive engine. He is ideally suited to the physical, intense game that the surface demands, and he has never relied on a big serve that a clay court might neutralize for his success.
He beat Daniil Medvedev — who hates clay — to make the 2024 French Open quarterfinals in a miasma of rain and cloud, screaming to his friends and coaches, “I love the clay. I love it here. I can’t get enough.”
GO DEEPER
‘English weather’ in Paris: How a rainy French Open changes everything on and off court
He got a slew of ‘I told you sos’ from those coaches. Then he made the quarterfinals of both Wimbledon and the U.S. Open, forced out of the former by a cruel stroke of bad luck when he got injured at the end of his fourth-round win. Balky hip and all, he battled his way into the year-end finals, entering the elite company of the top eight.
He was already a massive star in Australia. Beyond his homeland, he was best known as a star boyfriend, the guy who caught the next flight out of Acapulco, Mexico after winning the ATP event there last March to see his partner, English top-30 WTA player Katie Boulter, play her own final the next night in San Diego, California. The effort set the bar for all boyfriends, sports and otherwise, and crossed over from sports coverage into the television morning shows. He proposed to Boulter during the off-season. She said yes.
At the French Open last May, on a walk through the corridors underneath Court Philippe Chatrier at Roland Garros, he explained that he wanted to evolve from a grinder into someone with the extra oomph to hit the ball through the court occasionally. Maybe even get some easy points on serve. He was too easy to push around.
“I would get exposed and kind of bullied a little bit,” he said.
When de Minaur arrived on the ATP Tour six years ago, he was a little more than 150 pounds (68kg) dripping wet. He’s now up to about 167lb after some gym work, and during the past year, his weight and strength hit a tipping point. Finally, he could push the best players in the world back onto their heels with a combination of newfound power and more revs on his groundstrokes.
“It’s always been about getting stronger, putting a little bit more weight on me,” he said. “My weight of ball is also a little bit bigger and ultimately that’s what I needed to compete against the top players in the world.”
He couldn’t win a match at those end-of-year finals. Still, he believed he had arrived.
“I’ve crossed a big barrier in my career, and now it’s about making use of my position,” de Minaur said.
Kyrgios doesn’t disagree. In his news conference Friday, he recalled the first time he hit with de Minaur, when the latter was a teenager tagging along to a Davis Cup tie as a training partner. Kyrgios decided to play some balls with him late one day. He brought a beer to the court, thinking it wouldn’t be too serious.
“I was like, ‘I’ll go out there and teach this little kid a lesson’. (But) It was a really close set. I was in my prime. He was only 17,” he said. “To see how well he’s taken it upon himself to be our No. 1 player for the last three, four years — he’s grown.
“ I was there. I didn’t always deal with it the best.”
No, he did not. Can he do it now? Can he again be the player that reached a Wimbledon final?
Kyrgios will never approach a match with much humility. He has said his sport requires a certain amount of delusion.
“If I’m playing my style of tennis, my unpredictability, I have a chance against anyone. That’s the mindset you need to have,” he said Friday. “If I walked out on the court for the first time against Nadal, Djokovic, Federer, and was realistic, I probably wouldn’t have won. A kid from Canberra going out there, and beating them… You can’t be realistic. You have to think, ‘I’m the best tennis player in the world.’ Is that realistic? Probably not. But I think that when I’m out there.”
Here lies perhaps the lone similarity between the two, even if de Minaur expresses the sentiment somewhat differently. He has said that with passing each Australian Open, he’s arrived as a better version of himself. He’s learned plenty. Winning has bred confidence.
“If it was strictly based on rankings, it would be quite a boring sport, but anything can happen at this stage,” he said. “We’ve seen opportunities arise, lots of doors opening up.
“There’s always a chance. Every time you step out for a tournament, you always got to think that there’s a chance.”
(Top photos: Getty Images; design: Will Tullos)
Culture
Art Once Divided Father and Son. Could It Now Bring Them Together?
Charles Santore was in the middle of illustrating the children’s book he did not know would be his last when he began to feel weak.
The book was “The Scroobious Pip,” Edward Lear’s nonsense poem about an uncategorizable creature: part beast, part bird, part fish, part insect. The man bringing it to visual life was a beloved illustrator, a master of realism whose versions of “The Night Before Christmas,” “Peter Rabbit” and “The Wizard of Oz” have sold hundreds of thousands of copies.
Over the course of his career, Charlie, as he was known, rarely missed a day in his studio, two blocks from Rittenhouse Square in Philadelphia. But suddenly, he found himself in so much pain that he was unable to work.
On Aug. 11, 2019 — only six days after he was admitted to Pennsylvania Hospital — Charlie died. He was 84.
Soon after, his friend and agent Buz Teacher called a meeting with Charlie’s three adult children to discuss their father’s work. Among the most pressing questions was how to proceed with “The Scroobious Pip,” which was under contract with Running Press, a Philadelphia-based imprint of Hachette. Charlie had made nine drawings for it — each one an incredibly detailed menagerie — and three watercolor paintings. But there was an enormous amount of work left.
Charlie’s daughter Christina had an idea. What if her younger brother, Nicholas — Nicky — finished illustrating the book? After all, Nicky was the Santore who had followed most closely in his father’s footsteps: He’d gone to the Rhode Island School of Design and then to Yale for an M.F.A. in painting. According to those around him, Nicky really had a gift.
Charlie’s youngest brother, Joe Santore, a fine artist who teaches at the New York Studio School, recalled Nicky’s early drawings as “very impressive, very quiet — like him, very beautifully drawn and gentle.” “There was a beautiful light in them, a real feel for the quality of line and the touch,” he said.
Nicky’s first reaction to the suggestion that he complete “The Scroobious Pip” was skepticism. He didn’t know if he could do the project justice. Even if he could, the role of art in his life had long been a source of tension with his father.
Growing up, Nicky admired his father’s skill. “I remember always smiling when he would draw something, because he was so good,” Nicky said. “He was such a good draftsman.” As a child, Nicky took to drawing quickly, eagerly completing visual exercises his father assigned him.
But despite his talent, Nicky had many other interests. After his first year at Yale, he spent his summer at home, surfing and playing music. His father disapproved. Charlie was a perfectionist and a professional, someone who would never miss a deadline. He was deeply focused on his art, family members said, and he couldn’t understand why Nicky, who had such obvious artistic talent, wasn’t tending to it.
The day Nicky was due to depart for New Haven, Conn., Charlie took him aside for a talk. “You need to focus if you want to be serious,” Nicky recalled his father saying. But for a very long time, Nicky resisted. “Our ideals were at odds. … It turned me off, in a way. It wasn’t what I wanted to hear.”
By the time of his father’s death, Nicky had been drifting away from visual art for nearly a decade. He had participated in a couple of studio shows, but had lately become something of a jack-of-all-trades, taking on carpentry work, playing in a band and helping to raise his two young daughters. In other words, doing a little of everything — except painting.
Aside from the philosophical disconnect between father and son, two technical differences separated Nicky’s art from Charlie’s. For his children’s books, Charlie had mainly used watercolor — a notoriously unforgiving medium — whereas Nicky mostly painted in oil. And if Nicky’s relationship to visual art in general was fraught, his relationship to the art of illustration was even more so.
At Yale, Nicky had been encouraged to move away from anything deemed commercial. His education was unlike the one his father had received, which amounted to “draw well and you’ll be a good artist,” Nicky said. After Yale, Joe recalled, Nicky’s “work became much more geometrically oriented, structurally oriented.” It caught the attention of some gallerists; Nicky now feels he might not have made the most of the opportunities that arose.
“I’m bad at follow-through,” he said.
And so, characteristically, Nicky assumed the question of whether he could finish “The Scroobious Pip” was one he could return to after he had more time to think.
But two days after their initial meeting, Buz called again. He had mentioned the idea to Running Press — which Buz and his brother Lawrence founded in 1972, before selling it in the early 2000s — and had received an enthusiastic response.
“I was like, well, wait,” Nicky said. “You haven’t even seen anything I’ve done. I don’t even know if I could do it.”
He decided to spend several months in his father’s longtime studio, surrounded by Charlie’s art, files and photo references. There, he would try to dust off the dormant technical skills he had developed as a younger artist, including some he had learned directly from his father. Running Press would take a look at the results whenever Nicky felt ready; collectively, they would agree on whether to proceed with “The Scroobious Pip.”
The pressure on Nicky to live up to the family name came not just from his father. In some ways, it could be said to come from the city of Philadelphia, where, in certain circles, the Santore name is renowned.
Charlie’s father, another Charles, was a boxer and union organizer who now has a branch of the Free Library of Philadelphia named in his honor. That Charles and his wife, Nellie, had four sons: Charlie was the oldest; then came Bobby and Richie, twins who founded the Saloon, a fabled Philadelphia restaurant (worth visiting for its décor alone, which was largely overseen by Charlie); and then came Joe, the contemporary artist.
The next generation proved equally interesting: Nicky’s oldest brother, Charles III, is — almost unbelievably — a professional safecracker; his sister Christina is a writer and editor who lives in Amsterdam.
Looking at the highly varied accomplishments of the Santores, one might imagine a sort of Philadelphian version of the Royal Tenenbaums: children of privilege, or at least of intellectuals. But the four Santore brothers and their descendants, according to Joe, were pulled toward creative fields not because of their upbringing, but in spite of it.
Their part of Philadelphia — now called Bella Vista and then known by its parish name, St. Mary’s — was “kind of a wild neighborhood,” Joe said. And Charlie was a neighborhood guy. Known for his street fighting and his pool playing, “he didn’t take any nonsense from anybody.” “But on the other hand, he was interested in art, music,” Joe said.
Asked whether it could have been their parents who encouraged the Santore brothers creatively, Joe thought for a bit. “It wasn’t my dad who was interested in art,” he said, though their father was proud of their abilities and took commissions from the neighborhood for his sons’ hand-drawn Christmas cards. Nor, Joe said, was their mother, though she was known to draw a little.
Mainly, he credits two Philadelphia public schools: the James Campbell School, where they went for their elementary education — “it was the kind of school that encouraged you to do what you were good at,” Joe said — and Edward Bok Technical High School, where Charlie studied design. When Charlie was awarded a full scholarship to the Philadelphia Museum School of Art for an undergraduate degree, it was a big deal. “Nobody went to college,” Joe said.
But Charlie did. It would become the first step toward a career in art that included a long chapter in commercial illustration, a lifelong passion for antiques (he wrote the definitive texts on Windsor chairs) and ultimately a career as a children’s book illustrator. And Charlie’s higher education would become an important step for the rest of the family, too: It was Charlie who pushed Joe, then two years out of high school and feeling adrift, to consider a college degree. “He said to me, ‘What are you doing with your life?’” It wasn’t long before Joe was enrolled at the Philadelphia College of Art.
In life, and even after death, Charlie seemed to have a way of bringing the other artists in his family back to the work he felt sure they should be doing. Some of his final words to Nicky had been: “Just paint. You’ll find your way.”
So in 2020, Nicky sat down in Charlie’s studio, regarded his father’s work in progress and set out to do exactly that — paint, but not without trepidation.
“The first meeting we had with him, he looked very nervous,” said Julie Matysik, editorial director of Running Press Kids.
Frances Soo Ping Chow, vice president and creative director of Running Press, offered some simple advice. “You don’t have to live up to anyone,” she said. “This is your project now.”
The work was slow at first. For Nicky, it was challenging to abide by his father’s singular rules. Any white in the picture had to be the white of the paper: Charlie thought it was cheating to add white paint after the fact.
Nicky took nearly three years to finish the book. But by 2023, the artwork for “The Scroobious Pip” was complete — and remarkable. On one page, the translucent wings of a dragonfly refracted the green of tall grass in the background. On another, sea creatures breached a blue-and-gray ocean.
“It’s been amazing to watch,” Matysik said.
Next to her, Soo Ping Chow looked over Nicky’s finished portfolio in the offices of Running Press. It was possible to discern a slight difference in style between Charlie’s three paintings and the rest, which were Nicky’s: Charlie’s palette was brighter, Nicky’s more subdued; Charlie’s technique was dryer, Nicky’s more liquid. But rather than feeling accidental, the effect seemed intentional, and moving. A son and his late father, still and always in conversation with one another: There was something nearly supernatural about it.
“You can see it,” Soo Ping Chow said. “This book is really beautiful.”
Did Nicky agree? Characteristically, he hesitated. “I think we pulled it off,” he said, at last.
As for what’s next: Nicky is making his own paintings again. He is also at work on another children’s book for Running Press, “The Three Witches,” inspired by MacBeth and by Henry Mercer’s Tile Works in Bucks County, Pa. He is returning to the geometric style that characterized his solo work; he is also using the lessons he learned from finishing “The Scroobious Pip.” For “The Three Witches,” he will use watercolor again, he said — the medium his father loved so much.
Only this time, Nicky said, he’ll do it his way.
Culture
Chargers’ Justin Herbert falls short to remain winless in postseason: ‘I let the team down’
HOUSTON — Justin Herbert sat in a chair at his locker, motionless, hands on his knees, a blank stare on his face. It did not look like it, but he was listening.
Defensive lineman Morgan Fox was sitting on the floor to Herbert’s right. Fox was talking in a hushed tone to the Los Angeles Chargers quarterback.
“I just told him I’m proud of him,” Fox said. “No one else I’d rather go to war with. That he’s probably the best quarterback I’ve ever played with. He’s great. He’s incredibly talented. Just told him to keep his head up.”
After about a minute, Fox popped up, gave Herbert a hug and walked to his locker on the other side of the room.
Then Herbert was alone. Left with his own thoughts. Left with the irrepressible stinging of another early playoff exit.
The Chargers lost to the Houston Texans 32-12 on Saturday at NRG Stadium. A dramatic turnaround engineered by coach Jim Harbaugh ended with a whimper in the wild-card round. Herbert threw four interceptions. He had never turned the ball over more than twice in any game in his professional career.
“I let the team down,” Herbert said.
GO DEEPER
Texans pick off Herbert 4 times in 32-12 wild-card blowout: Takeaways
Herbert always takes the blame after losses. Most times, he is just being a good teammate. This time, his assessment is accurate.
He played the worst game of his career in the biggest game of his career.
“No one feels worse than I do,” Herbert said.
What awaits is an unavoidable avalanche of questions and criticism. It is the nature of the position he plays. It is the nature of the immense contract he signed.
He will hear the noise for at least another 12 months, until his next potential chance at a playoff win.
Herbert is outrageously talented. No quarterback in NFL history has thrown for more yards through five seasons. He does things on a football field that few humans, if any, have ever been able to do. But athletes are ultimately judged on how they perform when the lights are brightest, when a championship hangs in the balance. Herbert wilted on the grand stage, and he is now 0-2 in the playoffs.
Herbert’s last postseason appearance came in 2022. He helped build a 27-0 lead over the Jacksonville Jaguars in the wild-card round. The Chargers collapsed. Herbert missed a wide-open Keenan Allen in the end zone late in the first half of that game. But Herbert played well enough for the Chargers to win. They could not run the ball in the second half. They committed backbreaking penalty after backbreaking penalty as part of a defensive unraveling.
Saturday was different. No amount of nuance or context can explain this one away. Herbert looked tight. He made uncharacteristically bad decisions. He made uncharacteristically inaccurate throws.
Herbert had thrown three interceptions on 504 attempts in the regular season. His four interceptions against the Texans came on 32 attempts. He completed just 14 passes. His 43.8 completion percentage was the worst of his career. He averaged minus-0.59 expected points added per dropback, according to TruMedia, the lowest mark of his career in any game he started and finished.
Harbaugh said Herbert played “like he always does.”
“Complete beast,” Harbaugh added.
But that is just not true.
Early in the second quarter, the Chargers led 6-0. Texans quarterback C.J. Stroud floated a throw down the left sideline to no one in particular. Cornerback Deane Leonard was waiting and came down with the interception, tapping both toes inbounds along the sideline.
The Chargers took over at the Texans’ 40-yard line. On the first play of the possession, the Chargers rolled Herbert out to the right on a designed bootleg. There was pressure in Herbert’s face, as there was all game long. He threw off balance to receiver Quentin Johnston on a corner route, all the way across the field. It was an unnecessarily risky throw. It was underthrown. Texans cornerback Kamari Lassiter picked it off. The Chargers needed fewer than five yards to get into Cameron Dicker’s field goal range. This throw took points off the board.
“Got to be better about that, throw the ball away, throw it further,” Herbert said. “Got to do a better job of not putting it in harm’s way.”
The @HoustonTexans take it right back! Kamari Lassiter with the pick.
📺: #LACvsHOU on CBS/Paramount+
📱: Stream on #NFLPlus pic.twitter.com/Up3GcnjfrY— NFL (@NFL) January 11, 2025
The Chargers were on the right hash for this snap. Harbaugh said after the game that this play should have been called only if the Chargers were on the left hash, shortening the throw.
“I take accountability for that one,” Harbaugh said, even though it is offensive coordinator Greg Roman calling the plays.
Late in the third quarter, the Chargers took over at their 28-yard line, trailing 13-6. Herbert took the shotgun snap. He looked left at receiver Ladd McConkey, who ran a comeback route out of the slot. Herbert double-pumped. He did not fully reset his feet. And Herbert’s throw sailed high and through McConkey’s hands. Texans safety Eric Murray picked it off and returned it for a touchdown.
“That’s on me to make a better throw,” Herbert said.
Took it to the crib! @HoustonTexans extend their lead.
📺: #LACvsHOU on CBS/Paramount+
📱: Stream on #NFLPlus pic.twitter.com/FZbCiIeG7u— NFL (@NFL) January 12, 2025
Herbert was intercepted again on the next drive, though this was not his fault. Will Dissly dropped a ball that was in his hands. It squirted through, and Texans cornerback Derek Stingley Jr. intercepted it.
Herbert threw a fourth interception late in garbage time. Receiver DJ Chark was open on a go route. Herbert did not put enough on the pass. Stingley, an All-Pro, came down with his second pick of the game.
“It’s on me as a quarterback to be able to deliver the ball,” Herbert said.
The Chargers offense was given opportunity after opportunity through the first three quarters. The unit squandered every one.
Most of these were on Herbert, but not all of them. The Chargers were overmatched on the line of scrimmage. The Texans defensive line, including edge rushers Will Anderson Jr. and Danielle Hunter, dominated the game. Right tackle Joe Alt played one of his worst games of the season. Right guard Jamaree Salyer was bullied on multiple pass-blocking snaps. Herbert was running for his life or taking shots on many of his dropbacks.
“We can’t let Justin get hit that many times,” left guard Zion Johnson said.
But Herbert has weathered this kind of pressure before. He did it as recently as Week 16 against the Denver Broncos, when he was pressured on 54.1 percent of his dropbacks.
The Chargers were desperate for playmaking from their best playmaker. And Herbert fell disastrously short. He did not have a rushing attempt. The game was begging for a scramble to keep the Houston pass rush off balance.
“He’s got to be able to finish a throwing motion,” Harbaugh said. “We didn’t put him in the position to do that enough.”
Herbert needs more weapons. McConkey caught nine passes for 197 yards and a touchdown. No other Chargers player caught more than two passes. That must be a focus for the organization this offseason. It has to add receivers and a tight end.
Dissly had a commendable season, but he had two crucial drops. The interception was his second drop. The first came on a second-and-19 in the first quarter. Safety Alohi Gilman had just forced a fumble on the Texans’ opening offensive play, setting the Chargers up in opposing territory.
Herbert escaped pressure and found Dissly near the left sideline. Dissly would have been close to first-down yardage. A catch would have at least made the ensuing third down more manageable. The Chargers settled for a field goal.
“We got to score,” said J.K. Dobbins, who had nine carries for 26 yards, including only one carry in the second half.
There were other missed opportunities, in all three phases. The Texans trailed 6-0 late in the first half and faced a third-and-16, backed up inside their own 20. Stroud dropped the shotgun snap. The ball was loose. But Stroud was able to pick the ball up, escape to his right and find receiver Xavier Hutchinson for a 34-yard gain. That sparked a 99-yard touchdown drive, capped off by a Nico Collins touchdown reception. Collins had seven catches for 122 yards. Cornerback Kristian Fulton struggled to match up with the big-bodied receiver.
Safety Derwin James Jr. said the coverage was “a little off” on Stroud’s scoop-and-sling because of the fumbled snap.
“It kind of turned the game,” James said.
“It went his way,” Gilman said.
“JUST LIKE THEY DREW IT UP!”
C.J. Stroud makes things happen after the bad snap 😱
📺: #LACvsHOU on CBS/Paramount+
📱: Stream on #NFLPlus pic.twitter.com/II2oMnkbM1— NFL (@NFL) January 11, 2025
Early in the second half, the Chargers faced a fourth-and-2 from the Texans’ 34-yard line. They had gotten the ball back on another turnover, this one a forced fumble and recovery from safety Tony Jefferson. Harbaugh went for it. Herbert took an under-center snap and faked a handoff to running back Hassan Haskins. Johnston was running a whip route to the right side, feinting to the inside before cutting to the flat. Herbert threw to Johnston, who was jammed at the line by Stingley. The pass fell incomplete. Johnston did not run his route to the first-down marker.
Harbaugh said the design of the play called for Johnston “to be deeper.”
“Sometimes the release, the coverage affects that,” Harbaugh added. “I would have liked to have called a different play or kicked the field goal there.”
It was a game littered with missed opportunities. The Chargers had a punt blocked and an extra point blocked on special teams. The extra point was returned for a Texans two-point conversion, turning a McConkey 86-yard touchdown into just a four-point swing.
The end result was Herbert missing the biggest opportunity of his career so far.
“He’s the best quarterback I’ve ever played with,” Alt said.
“Our heart beats through 10,” center Bradley Bozeman said. “He’s the leader of this team. He’s a damn good football player.”
Herbert is now following the early career trajectory of Peyton Manning, the player he passed for most passing yards through his first five seasons.
Manning made the playoffs three times in his first five seasons. He went 0-3. In his fifth season, his Indianapolis Colts lost 41-0 to the New York Jets in the wild-card round. Manning completed 14 of 31 passes for 137 yards and two interceptions.
The next season, Manning won the MVP. The Colts won two playoff games and made it to the AFC Championship Game.
There is precedent for an ubertalented quarterback struggling early in his career before getting over the hump.
But just like Manning, Herbert will face questions and criticism.
Until he shows up.
“I put the team in jeopardy,” Herbert said. “That’s on me to get better and keep pushing forward.”
(Photo: Brandon Sloter / Getty Images)
-
Politics1 week ago
Who Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?
-
Health1 week ago
Ozempic ‘microdosing’ is the new weight-loss trend: Should you try it?
-
Technology5 days ago
Meta is highlighting a splintering global approach to online speech
-
Science2 days ago
Metro will offer free rides in L.A. through Sunday due to fires
-
News1 week ago
Seeking to heal the country, Jimmy Carter pardoned men who evaded the Vietnam War draft
-
Technology6 days ago
Las Vegas police release ChatGPT logs from the suspect in the Cybertruck explosion
-
Movie Reviews7 days ago
‘How to Make Millions Before Grandma Dies’ Review: Thai Oscar Entry Is a Disarmingly Sentimental Tear-Jerker
-
News1 week ago
Trump Has Reeled in More Than $200 Million Since Election Day