Connect with us

Business

Why hundreds of people in L.A. are strapping cameras on their bodies to do chores

Published

on

Why hundreds of people in L.A. are strapping cameras on their bodies to do chores

The hottest new gig-economy job in Los Angeles is performing at home to help artificial intelligence understand how humans move.

Hundreds of people from Santa Monica to Los Feliz are strapping cameras on their heads and hands as they do chores at home so bots can watch how they make coffee, scrub toilets, water plants and wash dishes.

At a corner table at Urth Caffe downtown, a woman is sitting next to a big black bag. A constant flow of visitors stops by. She slips each a package and instructions, and they move on.

“People think I am selling” drugs, she says.

She’s actually a manager for a San Francisco-based firm called Instawork that connects companies and blue-collar workers, and she’s handing out headbands with phone mounts, a simple piece of equipment that lets people record their every move — movements that will be turned into data to train robots how to act.

Advertisement

She hands Salvador Arciga a headmount and tells him to go home and do the dishes and clean his kitchen.

He has done odd jobs all over town: DoorDash delivery, handing out hats at Dodger Stadium, washing dishes at Disneyland, hanging holiday lights at the Los Angeles Zoo and more. This job seems relatively easy, and it pays $80 for two hours of footage.

“I need to do chores anyway,” he says. “Now I get a chance to get paid to do it.”

Salvador Arciga checks in for work in front of Urth Caffe to collect his headset in January.

(Ronaldo Bolanos / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

AI chatbots like ChatGPT learned to converse, make music, generate images, and write code by using all the information they could get from the internet. Now, as AI and robotics companies figure out how to do the same in the physical world, the models need much more information about real-world movements.

It is not as readily available online, so the quest to capture data on human movement has given rise to a micro-economy that supplies real-world demonstrations of what some call “physical AI” systems, such as humanoid robots.

“Humans are supplying ground truth, judgment, or structured feedback that models can’t reliably produce on their own yet,” said Jason Saltzman, head of insights at market intelligence firm CB Insights.

Some countries already have “arm farms,” dedicated facilities where hundreds of humans record first-person footage of them opening doors or folding laundry for robotics. In China, there are more than 40 state-owned training centers where humans operate robots wearing virtual reality headsets.

Advertisement

The development of robotic models is a key focus for major tech companies like Tesla and Google, as well as California startups such as Figure AI and Dyna Robotics.

Goldman Sachs forecasts the market for humanoids could reach $38 billion by 2035. Much of that will be led by China, but California is also a growing center of next-generation robotics.

This intense demand is driving significant activity among niche data providers. San Francisco-based Encord, for instance, raised $60 million in February after its physical AI operations revenue increased tenfold in the last year. In the same vein, Meta-backed Scale AI has gathered 100,000 hours of footage for robotics, while its Palo Alto-based competitor Micro1 employs 1,000 people across 60 countries to record household tasks.

The global data collection and labeling market alone could reach $17 billion by 2030, says market intelligence firm Grand View Research.

Critics argue this work is extractive and poorly compensated, especially when these AI systems are being trained to ultimately replace human labor.

Advertisement

Still, in an embattled economy, with rising inflation and growing unemployment, more workers like Arciga are turning to these jobs for quick cash. In some cases, entire families sign up to record video, speech and images for AI training to supplement their income.

“It’s one of the biggest gig economies that is going to exist in the whole world,” said Shahbaz Magsi, co-founder of Sunain, a human data capture startup.

Arciga adjusts the headset to record himself doing housework

Arciga adjusts the headset to record himself doing housework in Koreatown.

(Ronaldo Bolanos / Los Angeles Times)

Arciga fastens the headset over his black beanie and enables “Do Not Disturb” on his iPhone, before fastening the phone to his head to record.

Advertisement

As he grabs a paper towel to wipe a stain on his stovetop, he narrates what he is doing, as the manager he met at the cafe had instructed him to do. She said it didn’t matter whether he said it in Spanish or English.

“Right now, I am going to use the spray,” he says.

Each task recorded — be it plant watering or kitchen cleaning — has to last between two and 15 minutes.

Instawork, the company that hired Arciga and more than 50 others like him that day, has historically catered to stadiums, hotels, kitchens and other businesses that need temporary workers.

It has also entered the human movement data capture business to leverage its workforce to train and support robotics systems.

Advertisement

Many new startups have begun building custom hardware — cameras and bodysuits — to capture nuances of human movement, pressure, depth of touch and human pose reconstruction for their datasets.

Egyptian immigrants Azzam and Samra Ahmed are padding their savings by performing for bots in their one-bedroom apartment in Pasadena.

They put on wrist and head cameras before preparing dinner.

The wrist camera captures how every muscle moves as they chop vegetables, season and grill chicken and roll up their shawarmas. This level of detail is needed for a robotic model to learn exact hand movements that cannot be caught by the standard human point of view.

Sunain, the human data capture startup, ships these custom wrist cameras to vetted contributors in its network. It has more than 1,400 contributors in Los Angeles, from Culver City and Santa Monica in the west to Pasadena and Los Feliz in the east.

Advertisement
Arciga cleans a kitchen counter while wearing a headset

Arciga cleans a kitchen counter while narrating his actions.

(Ronaldo Bolanos / Los Angeles Times)

“The region offers unmatched diversity of homes, lifestyles and people,” said Magsi, CEO of Sunain.

Where Instawork orders scripted movements, Sunain encourages its gig workers to record natural human behavior, including jumping between tasks.

If humans hear a running tap in the bathroom while cooking, they pause cooking to go close the tap before returning to cooking. That’s how robots will be expected to behave in the real world.

Advertisement

“These robots need to understand the context switching that humans do,” Magsi said.

For the Ahmeds, who work during the day as a mechanic and a nail salon employee, life in their apartment has been reshaped by robot training. They watch Netflix, cook and play table tennis wearing their gear. Their parents are shocked to see the couple living their normal lives covered in cameras.

“We are making money off something that we do every single day,” Azzam Ahmed said. “That’s like getting paid for breathing.”

It’s not always easy work.

Some workers complain that receiving calls and messages can interrupt their recordings, and having a phone strapped to their head is uncomfortable. Some complain that their videos aren’t accepted sometimes, so it takes longer than they expect to get the right footage to get paid.

Advertisement

A recent attempt by the Ahmeds to record cooking was disqualified for payment after reviewers found that steam from the dish had blocked the video. Since then, the couple have avoided cooking steamy dishes.

Still, they each earned $1,200 by doing chores they recorded.

“That money goes directly to our savings,” Azzam Ahmed said.

Sunain has expanded its robot data capture to homes in Turkey, Singapore, Canada and Malaysia. The company has 25,000 contributors across 30 countries to work on voice, video and text completion tasks.

Arciga says some of his friends have challenged him to reconsider whether he should be training AI to do what only humans can do. “Sometimes they do tell me, ‘Well, you’re the problem,’” he said.

Advertisement

His response is that new technology always brings fear and change and it also creates new kinds of jobs, like his latest gig, and people will always demand a human connection.

“People will still need people,” he said.

Business

Anthropic’s C.E.O. Says It Could Grow by 80 Times This Year

Published

on

Anthropic’s C.E.O. Says It Could Grow by 80 Times This Year

Dario Amodei, the chief executive of Anthropic, said on Wednesday that his artificial intelligence company had planned for growing about 10 times as big this year, only to reach a growth rate that could make it 80 times as big this year instead.

Mr. Amodei, 43, made his remarks at Anthropic’s annual developer conference in San Francisco, where he and other executives gave a glimpse into the company’s plans. Anthropic is one of the world’s leading A.I. start-ups with its Claude chatbot and its popular A.I. coding tool, Claude Code, which people can pay to subscribe to. Last month, Anthropic said its annual revenue run rate had surpassed $30 billion, up from $9 billion at the end of 2025.

At the conference, Mr. Amodei said Anthropic had been overwhelmed by the rate of growth, which has increased the company’s need for computing power to deliver its A.I. products to customers.

“I hope that 80-times growth doesn’t continue because that’s just crazy and it’s too hard to handle,” Mr. Amodei said. “I’m hoping for some more normal numbers.”

To obtain more computing power, Anthropic has signed a series of deals with industry giants. At the conference, Anthropic said it had sealed an agreement with Elon Musk’s SpaceX to use all of the computing capacity from the rocket company’s Colossus 1 data center in Memphis. The move gives Anthropic access to the computing power of more than 220,000 Nvidia A.I. chips, the company said, and opens the door to working with SpaceX to create A.I. data centers in space.

Advertisement

Anthropic declined to disclose the terms of the deal. SpaceX did not respond to a request for comment.

“As you saw today with the SpaceX compute deal, we’re working as quickly as possible to provide more compute than we have in the past,” Mr. Amodei said, using an industry term for computing power. He added that his company was working every day “to obtain even more compute” for users.

With the SpaceX deal, Anthropic said, it can expand the amount of coding that some Claude Code subscribers can do before they hit a usage limit with the tool. Anthropic offers people different pricing depending on the amount of coding they want to do.

Continue Reading

Business

Merger costs add up as Warner Bros. Discovery posts $2.9-billion quarterly loss

Published

on

Merger costs add up as Warner Bros. Discovery posts .9-billion quarterly loss

Warner Bros. Discovery’s impending sale has rattled Hollywood — and the company’s balance sheet as the auction’s high costs increasingly come into focus.

The New York-based media company released its first-quarter earnings report Wednesday, which included a $2.9-billion loss. That amount includes $1.3 billion in restructuring expenses, including updated valuations for Warner’s declining linear cable television networks.

Contributing to the net loss was the $2.8-billion termination fee paid to Netflix in late February when the streaming giant bowed out of the bidding for Warner. The auction winner, Paramount Skydance, covered the payment to Netflix, but Warner still must carry the obligation on its balance sheet in case the Paramount takeover falls apart. Should that happen, Warner would have to reimburse Paramount.

Warner also spent an additional $100 million to run the auction and prepare for the upcoming transaction, according to its regulatory filing.

Stockholders late last month overwhelmingly approved Warner’s sale to Paramount.

Advertisement

The $111-billion deal faces opposition among film and television industry workers, many of whom have been sidelined after previous consolidations among the original studios and a pullback in production that has hurt the L.A. economy.

“As we prepare for our next chapter, our focus remains on executing our key strategic priorities: scaling HBO Max globally, returning our Studios to industry leadership, and optimizing our Global Linear Networks,” Warner Bros. Discovery leaders said Wednesday in a letter to shareholders.

In the January-March period, Warner generated $8.9 billion in revenue, a 3% decline from the same quarter one year ago, excluding the effect of foreign exchange rate fluctuations.

The company’s results fell short of Wall Street estimates. It posted a $1.17-per-share loss, much wider than analysts’ expectations for a loss of about 11 cents per share.

Warner’s streaming services, including HBO Max, notched milestones in the quarter and 9% revenue growth to $2.9 billion. The company launched HBO Max in Germany, Italy, Britain and Ireland during the quarter.

Advertisement

Advertising revenue for streaming was up 20% compared with the first quarter of 2025.

The streaming unit posted a 17% increase to $438 million in adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA.

Warner’s studios, primarily its TV business, had a strong quarter, in part because of those international rollouts.

Studio revenue rose 35% to $3.1 billion compared with the prior-year quarter.

Television revenue soared 58% (excluding exchange rate fluctuations) because of increased program licensing fees to support the launch of HBO Max in the international markets. The launches also propelled the movie studio, which saw revenue increase 21%.

Advertisement

Video game revenue declined 30% because of lower library revenues.

Adjusted EBITDA for the studios grew $516 million (156%) to $775 million compared with the same quarter last year.

The company’s vast linear television networks — including CNN, TBS, Cartoon Network, HGTV, Animal Planet and TLC — saw revenue fall 8% to $4.4 billion.

TV distribution revenue tumbled 7% largely because of a 10% decrease in domestic linear pay TV subscribers.

The company also felt the loss of its NBA contract for its TNT channel, which NBC picked up for its network and streaming service. Advertising revenue fell 11%. “The absence of the NBA negatively impacted the year-over-year growth rate,” Warner said.

Advertisement

The collapse of the legacy cable TV business is one of the drivers behind Paramount’s quest to acquire Warner. Both companies have long relied on their cable TV profits to shore up more volatile business segments, including their film studios. Paramount also wants Warner’s prestigious properties, including its film and TV studios and HBO Max, which now has 140 million subscribers.

But as the Paramount-Warner merger draws closer, the opposition has grown louder.

More than 4,000 artists and entertainment industry workers, including Bryan Cranston, Noah Wyle, Kristen Stewart and Jane Fonda, have signed an open letter warning about the dangers of the merger with Paramount.

“This transaction would further consolidate an already concentrated media landscape, reducing competition at a moment when our industries — and the audiences we serve — can least afford it,” according to the letter.

“The result will be fewer opportunities for creators, fewer jobs across the production ecosystem, higher costs, and less choice for audiences in the United States and around the world.”

Advertisement

The merger still needs the approval of regulators in the U.S. and abroad.

Adjusted EBITDA for the television networks fell 10% to $1.6 billion.

Warner ended the quarter with $3.3 billion in cash on hand and $33.4 billion of gross debt.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Howard Lutnick Faces Questions From Congress About Epstein Ties

Published

on

Howard Lutnick Faces Questions From Congress About Epstein Ties

Howard Lutnick, President Trump’s commerce secretary, faced questions on Wednesday in a closed-door session of the House Oversight Committee over his ties to Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender.

Mr. Lutnick is one of the highest-profile cabinet members to come under scrutiny in connection with Mr. Epstein. The commerce secretary’s name appeared in more than 250 documents in the Epstein files released by the Justice Department, a review by The New York Times found.

Asked whether Mr. Lutnick’s credibility had been undermined, Representative James Comer, a Republican of Kentucky who chairs the House Oversight Committee said Wednesday, “we’re going to ask him all these questions, and we’ll let the American people judge whether the credibility was damaged or not at the end of the day.”

Mr. Comer said that Mr. Lutnick “wasn’t 100 percent truthful with whether he or not he had been on the island.”

He added that it was the first time in the last decade that a chairman of the oversight committee had brought in a cabinet secretary of his own party.

Advertisement

During the hearing Mr. Lutnick downplayed his ties to Mr. Epstein, claiming their relationship was inconsequential, according to two people familiar with his testimony.

Mr. Lutnick lived next door to Mr. Epstein on the Upper East Side of Manhattan for over a decade. Until recently, he had claimed to have not been in the same room with Mr. Epstein after an encounter in 2005. But millions of documents that were released by the Justice Department earlier this year showed that Mr. Lutnick had traveled to Mr. Epstein’s private island in 2012.

The documents suggest Mr. Lutnick had another encounter with Mr. Epstein at his house in 2011, years after Mr. Lutnick claimed to have cut ties with him. The records also indicated that the men invested in the same privately held company together and dealt with each other on neighborhood and philanthropic issues.

Mr. Epstein, who was convicted in Florida in 2008 of soliciting prostitution from a minor, died in a Manhattan jail in 2019 while being held on federal sex-trafficking charges.

Mr. Lutnick has received questions from lawmakers about his connections with Mr. Epstein in congressional hearings on other topics, first in February and again last month.

Advertisement

All Democrats and some Republicans on the Oversight Committee signaled that they would try to force a vote on a subpoena for Mr. Lutnick. But the panel’s Republican chairman, Representative James R. Comer of Kentucky, said that Mr. Lutnick had volunteered to testify.

The Commerce Department said in a statement on Wednesday that Mr. Lutnick looked forward to “putting to rest the inaccurate and baseless claims in the media.”

Though the committee’s investigation into Mr. Epstein and the Justice Department’s handling of the case against him has sprawled to include a number of political figures, Mr. Lutnick is the first current Trump administration official to testify before the panel.

The committee also issued a subpoena to Pam Bondi, the former attorney general who Mr. Trump fired last month, before she was dismissed from her position. She has not yet appeared for a deposition.

Questions by lawmakers in the closed-door session on Wednesday could touch on Mr. Lutnick’s former nanny. The files showed that Mr. Epstein expressed an interest in meeting the nanny in 2013 and had her résumé sent to him. It is not clear if they ever met.

Advertisement

Mr. Lutnick said in February that he did not know if the nanny had met Mr. Epstein, or if she was one of the nannies Mr. Lutnick had brought to the island. Mr. Lutnick has four children.

In October, Mr. Lutnick said in a podcast interview that he had decided after a 2005 incident not to associate with Mr. Epstein, after Mr. Epstein alluded to his sexual encounters with women while giving Mr. Lutnick and his wife a tour of his house.

“My wife and I decided that I will never be in the room with that disgusting person ever again,” Mr. Lutnick said on the podcast, “Pod Force One.” “So I was never in the room with him socially, for business or even philanthropy.”

But in a congressional hearing in February, Mr. Lutnick told lawmakers that he not only met with Mr. Epstein after that encounter, but that he and his family also traveled to his private Caribbean island, Little St. James, in 2012 for lunch. Mr. Lutnick was traveling aboard his yacht, accompanied by his wife, children, nannies and another family.

The visit took place four years after Mr. Epstein had pleaded guilty in Florida to soliciting prostitution from a minor as part of a plea bargain with federal prosecutors.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending