Connect with us

Business

Warren Hoge, Who Covered Wars and World Crises for The Times, Dies at 82

Published

on

Warren Hoge, Who Covered Wars and World Crises for The Times, Dies at 82

Warren Hoge, a former correspondent for The New York Times who covered civil wars in Latin America, the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, and numerous global crises before rising to the top ranks of the paper’s newsroom leadership, died on Wednesday at his home in Manhattan. He was 82.

His wife, Olivia Hoge, said the cause was pancreatic cancer, which was diagnosed early last year.

In a 32-year Times career, Mr. Hoge (pronounced hoag), was a versatile reporter and a vivid writer. In Rio de Janeiro, his first foreign assignment, he chronicled a visit by Pope John Paul II and the conundrums of that sprawling Brazilian city of beautiful beaches and hillside slums, which had been terrorized for a decade by vigilante death squads that had slain 3,000 suspected killers and rapists.

Covering political turmoil and guerrilla warfare in South and Central America from 1979 to 1983, Mr. Hoge wrote hundreds of articles on the civil wars that had ebbed and flowed in red tides for years in Nicaragua, Guatemala and El Salvador.

“No cadaver is ever pleasant to look upon,” Mr. Hoge wrote in 1983, in a laudatory review of Joan Didion’s recent book, “Salvador.”

Advertisement

“In my own experience,” he added, in The New York Times Book Review, “the horror of the notion came not when I was staring down at a culvert piled with the morning’s grisly harvest of corpses but when, after many weeks of doing so, I pondered that in a country so small the sheer number of such deaths meant that killing had to have become a daily occupation of many Salvadorans.

“It was a mathematical certainty,” he wrote. “It meant that there were hearths where a father bounced his baby on his knee and asked what was for dinner and spread his arms wide in his favorite chair to stretch from his body the rigors of another day spent torturing, mutilating and killing people.”

Returning to New York, where he had been the product of a privileged Manhattan upbringing, Mr. Hoge became The Times’s foreign news editor for four years beginning in 1983, directing worldwide coverage by scores of staff correspondents, part-time reporters and a cadre of specialized editors in New York.

In 1987, he was named assistant managing editor in charge of administrative and personnel matters. He kept his masthead title when he edited The Times’s Sunday Magazine from 1991 to 1993 and, until 1996, when he oversaw the Sunday Book Review and the culture, style, sports and travel news sections.

As the London bureau chief from 1996 to 2003, Mr. Hoge played key roles in covering the death of Diana in a Paris car crash on the night of Aug. 31, 1997. He wrote 5,000 words virtually overnight: her obituary and articles on Prince Charles returning the body to a grieving British nation, the plans for her funeral, and the royal family, traumatized by its loss and criticism of its tight rein on feelings.

Advertisement

“I saw people sobbing in the streets and surging out of subway stations clutching floral tributes,” Mr. Hoge said in a 2017 round-table retrospective with other Times reporters who had covered Diana’s death. “Mourners thronged the grounds outside her Kensington Palace residence, virtually carpeting the field with flowers and pushing bouquets through the wrought iron gate. Many stood in stricken silence; others knelt, prayed, made the sign of the cross, and slumped to the ground in tears.”

He covered the Labour Party government of Prime Minister Tony Blair and wrote an 8,000-word Times magazine profile of him. He also covered the cultures of Britain and Scandinavia and the 1998 Good Friday Agreement in Belfast, Northern Ireland, which ended most of the conflicts between Ulster Catholics and Protestants that had left thousands dead.

As chief United Nations correspondent from 2004 to 2008, Mr. Hoge wrote some 1,300 articles, many for the front page, on conflicts in Central Africa and the Middle East and on relief efforts in natural disasters. That included the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami, the deadliest in recorded history, which took 230,000 lives in a matter of hours.

By the time his journalism career was over, Mr. Hoge had reported from more than 80 countries.

Warren McClamroch Hoge was born in Manhattan on April 13, 1941, the third of four children of James Fulton and Virginia (McClamroch) Hoge. His father was a New York trademark lawyer, and his mother a socially prominent patron of the Metropolitan Opera, the New York Philharmonic Orchestra and Carnegie Hall. Warren and his siblings — his older brother, James, and his sisters, Barbara and Virginia — grew up in an eight-room apartment on Park Avenue.

Advertisement

James, the eldest, became publisher of The Chicago Sun-Times and later of The Daily News of New York. Warren, five years younger, followed James into the Buckley School in Manhattan and Phillips Exeter Academy in New Hampshire, where Warren was expelled for gambling. He transferred to Trinity School in Manhattan and graduated in 1959. Warren, like James, attended Yale, graduating in 1963 with a bachelor’s degree in English.

He was in the Army for six months in 1964 and in the Army Reserve until 1970. He took graduate courses at George Washington University while working as a reporter for the old Washington Star in 1964 and 1965, then became The New York Post’s Washington bureau chief for four years. In 1970, he moved to The Post’s New York office, where he soon rose to city editor and assistant managing editor.

A.M. Rosenthal, the managing editor of The Times and soon to be the executive editor, hired Mr. Hoge in 1976 as a metro reporter. A year later, he was named deputy metropolitan editor; by 1979, after only three years on the staff, he became the bureau chief in Rio de Janeiro.

In 1981, Mr. Hoge married Olivia Larisch in Rio. She was the daughter of Count Johann Larisch of Marbella, Spain, and Countess Wilhelmine Larisch.

In addition to his wife, he is survived by their son, Nicholas; two stepdaughters, Christina Villax and Tatjana Leimer; his brother, James; his sister Virginia Verwaal; and six step-grandchildren. His other sister, Barbara Hoge Daine, died in 2001.

Advertisement

After leaving The Times in 2008, Mr. Hoge was named vice president for external affairs of the International Peace Institute, a New York-based lobbying and research organization with close ties to the United Nations. He became the institute’s senior adviser in 2012.

In 1991, when Mr. Hoge was appointed editor of The Times Sunday Magazine, congratulatory notes poured in from many political and media leaders who were his friends. Avenue, a New York society magazine, ran a profile detailing his stylish sartorial tastes and listing a constellation of actresses and fashion models he had dated in a bachelor life that lasted until he was 40.

But it was a largely flattering portrait. “He’s in the Social Register, he’s married to an Austrian countess,” the article said. “His friends say only nice things about him. ‘Warren’s middle name is charm,’ declares one. ‘He’s the Fred Astaire of dance partners,’ says another. He gets high marks for politeness and civility. ‘Warren has a fundamental decency,’ says a Times editor. ‘He’s ambitious, but he’s nice to people over and under him.’”

William McDonald contributed reporting.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Business

Cleveland-Cliffs Signals a Possible New Bid for U.S. Steel

Published

on

Cleveland-Cliffs Signals a Possible New Bid for U.S. Steel

A possible new takeover bid for U.S. Steel emerged on Monday, teeing up more turmoil over the once-dominant company’s future after President Biden’s decision to block its acquisition by a Japanese company.

Lourenco Goncalves, the chief executive of an American competitor, Cleveland-Cliffs, said his company had “an All-American solution to save the United States Steel Corporation,” stressing that acquiring U.S. Steel was a matter of “when,” not “if.” But he offered no details of the bidding plans.

The renewed expression of interest from Cleveland-Cliffs comes less than two weeks after Mr. Biden blocked a $14 billion takeover of U.S. Steel by Nippon Steel, arguing that the sale posed a threat to national security. Cleveland-Cliffs tried to buy U.S. Steel in 2023, an offer that was rejected in favor of Nippon’s higher bid.

CNBC reported on Monday morning that Cleveland-Cliffs would seek to take over U.S. Steel and sell off its subsidiary, Big River Steel, to Nucor, another American producer. But Mr. Goncalves, at a news conference later in the day, would not confirm any partnership with Nucor on a bid.

U.S. Steel and Nucor did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Advertisement

Investors seemed pleased by the potential bid, sending shares of U.S. Steel up as much as 10 percent on Monday when CNBC reported the potential offer. Shares of U.S. Steel finished about 6 percent higher on Monday but are down 23 percent over the past year, including Monday’s spike.

But the fate of Nippon’s proposed takeover remains in limbo. U.S. Steel and Nippon sued the United States government last week in the hopes of reviving their merger, accusing Mr. Biden and other senior administration officials of corrupting the review process for political gain and blocking the deal under false pretenses.

The companies filed a separate lawsuit against Cleveland-Cliffs, Mr. Goncalves and David McCall, international president of the United Steelworkers union. They argue that Cleveland-Cliffs and the head of the union illegally colluded to undermine the Nippon deal, assertions that both defendants called “baseless.”

On Saturday, the companies said the Biden administration had delayed enforcement of its executive order blocking Nippon’s takeover until June, to give the courts time to review the lawsuit.

“The problem is, we can’t make anything happen until the current management and the current board of U.S. Steel make the decision to abandon the merger agreement with Nippon Steel,” Mr. Goncalves said at a news conference in Butler, Pa., on Monday.

Advertisement

Given this rancor, it is unclear how receptive U.S. Steel would be to a new bid by Cleveland-Cliffs. If U.S. Steel does not engage, one option would be for Cleveland-Cliffs to take an offer to shareholders.

U.S. Steel was once the world’s largest steel producer, but the company has fallen in global rankings in recent years. Concerns about its long-term future are rooted in a failure to quickly adopt alternatives to traditional mills that are more energy-efficient and cost-effective. Nippon, U.S. Steel has argued, is the only buyer that can make substantial investments in multiple steel mills and protect jobs.

The United Steelworkers, which represents 11,000 U.S. Steel employees, has voiced strong opposition to the proposed merger with Nippon. The powerful union has said the Japanese company engaged in illegal trade practices and dealt with the union in bad faith. Previously, the union expressed its preference for a merger with Cleveland-Cliffs, which is unionized.

A new bid by Cleveland-Cliffs, if it materializes, risks antitrust scrutiny from federal antitrust regulators, though regulators in the Trump administration are widely expected to take a less aggressive approach to merger enforcement than their Biden administration predecessors.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Supreme Court denies oil industry plea to block climate lawsuits filed by California, other blue states

Published

on

Supreme Court denies oil industry plea to block climate lawsuits filed by California, other blue states

The Supreme Court dealt a major setback to the oil industry Monday, refusing to block lawsuits from California and other blue states that seek billions of dollars in damages for the effects of climate change.

Without a comment or dissent, the justices turned down closely watched appeals from Sunoco, Shell and other energy producers.

In Sunoco vs. Honolulu, the oil industry urged the justices to intervene in these state cases and rule that because climate change is a global phenomenon, it is a matter for federal law only, not one suited to state-by-state claims.

“The stakes could not be higher,” they told the court.

But none of the justices said they wanted to hear their claim, at least not now.

Advertisement

The decision clears the way for more than two dozen suits filed by states and municipalities to move forward and try to prove their claim that the major oil producers knew of the potential damage of burning fossil fuels but chose to conceal it.

“Big Oil companies keep fighting a losing battle to avoid standing trial for their climate lies,” said Richard Wiles, president of the Center for Climate Integrity. “With this latest denial, the fossil fuel industry’s worst nightmare — having to face the overwhelming evidence of their decades of calculated climate deception — is closer than ever to becoming a reality.”

Two years ago, California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit in San Francisco County Superior Court against five of the largest oil and gas companies — Exxon Mobil, Shell, Chevron, ConocoPhillips and BP — and the American Petroleum Institute for what they described as a “decades-long campaign of deception” that created climate-related harms in California.

“For more than 50 years, Big Oil has been lying to us — covering up the fact that they’ve long known how dangerous the fossil fuels they produce are for our planet,” Newsom said in announcing the suit.

In recent days, California officials have blamed climate change for the devastating weather conditions that contributed to the deadly wildfires that destroyed thousands of homes and other structures, leading to what many experts expect to become the costliest natural disaster in U.S. history.

Advertisement

California’s suit followed the pattern set by similar claims from the cities of Baltimore, New York, Chicago and San Francisco as well as blue states including Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New Jersey and Minnesota.

These suits argue that the oil producers used deceptive marketing to hide the danger of burning fossil fuels. Under state law, companies can be held liable for failing to warn consumers of a known danger.

In June 2024, the court asked the Justice Department to weigh in on the issue. In December, lawyers for the Biden administration urged the court to stand aside for now because the suits are at an early stage.

Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. said he took no part in the decision to deny the appeals, presumably because he owns stock in companies affected by the dispute.

The climate change lawsuits were patterned after the successful mass lawsuits filed by states and others against the tobacco industry over cigarettes and the pharmaceutical industry over opioids.

Advertisement

Cigarettes and opioids were sold legally, but the suits alleged that industry officials conspired to deceive the public and hide the true dangers of their highly profitable products.

Under state law, plaintiffs can seek damages for broad and open-ended claims such as a failure to warn of a danger, false advertising or creating a public nuisance. All three claims are cited in California’s lawsuit. Federal law, by contrast, is usually limited to damage claims that are authorized by Congress.

Had the Supreme Court agreed to hear the oil industry’s appeal in the Hawaii case, it “would have frozen the cases for a year or more and could have resulted in a death blow for all of them,” said Patrick Parenteau, an environmental law expert at the Vermont Law School.

Los Angeles lawyer Theodore J. Boutrous Jr., who represents Chevron, said the company “will continue to defend against meritless state law climate litigation, which clashes with basic constitutional principles, undermines sound energy policy.”

Meanwhile, Alabama and 20 red states urged the court to throw out these blue-state lawsuits. They said liberal states and their judges should not have the power to set the nation’s policy on the energy industry. The court has not ruled on that claim yet.

Advertisement

The case dismissed Monday began five years ago when the city and county of Honolulu sued Sunoco and 14 other major oil and gas producers, alleging a failure to warn and creating a nuisance.

The Hawaii Supreme Court last year rejected the industry’s motion and refused to dismiss the suit.

“Simply put, the plaintiffs say the issue is whether defendants misled the public about fossil fuels’ dangers and environmental impact. We agree …. This suit does not seek to regulate emissions and does not seek damages for interstate emissions,” the state court said in a unanimous opinion. “Rather, plaintiffs’ complaint clearly seeks to challenge the promotion and sale of fossil-fuel products without warning and abetted by a sophisticated disinformation campaign.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

How the NFL Moved the Vikings-Rams Playoff Game Away From the L.A. Fires

Published

on

How the NFL Moved the Vikings-Rams Playoff Game Away From the L.A. Fires

Matthew Giachelli got the call he anticipated on Thursday morning: The N.F.L. was moving the Rams’ playoff game to Arizona because of the wildfires raging in Los Angeles, and the league needed 200 gallons of paint pronto.

The game on Monday between the Rams and the Minnesota Vikings would now be held at State Farm Stadium outside Phoenix, and it had to look and feel as if it were being played in the Rams’ usual home, SoFi Stadium. That included painting the field with the team’s and league’s logos and colors. The hometown Cardinals, though, did not have some of the needed hues on hand, including the Rams’ blue and yellow.

Giachelli’s company, World Class Athletic Surfaces in tiny Leland, Miss., provides paint to most N.F.L. and top college teams. Within hours, he and his co-workers had loaded five-gallon buckets of nine custom paint colors, as well as stencils for the N.F.L. playoff logos, onto a truck that left Thursday afternoon on a 1,500-mile journey to Arizona.

“I definitely regret what’s going on in California, but I’m glad we could meet their needs,” said Giachelli, the vice president of production and distribution.

Getting the right paint was just one of hundreds of details that the league, the Rams, the Vikings, the host Arizona Cardinals and ASM Global, which operates State Farm Stadium, have juggled since the N.F.L. decided to move the wild-card round game.

Advertisement

The N.F.L. has canceled preseason games and postponed and moved regular-season games over the years because of hurricanes, snowstorms and other calamities. But it had not moved a winner-take-all playoff showdown since 1936, when the site of its championship game was changed from Boston to New York to drum up ticket sales.

A battalion of people — from the front-office workers to the training staffs to the thousands of game-day workers — have been mobilized on short notice. Each game, particularly in the playoffs, generates tens of millions of dollars for television networks, advertisers and stadium operators, and with the season coming down to its last few weeks, there was little margin for error.

“If it can be played, they play it, and in this case, it can be played in Glendale,” said Joe Buck, who will call the game for ESPN on Monday. “We’re in the playoffs now, and you’ve got all this pressure to get this first round finished before Kansas City and Detroit,” which had first-round byes, “get back in.”

A big reason the N.F.L. is the world’s most valuable league is scarcity. There are just 272 regular-season games and 13 playoff games, so each one is of critical importance to the 32 teams. (By contrast, there are about 400 Major League Baseball games every month during the season.) They are also critical to the owners of those teams and the league, as well as broadcast networks, sponsors and other companies that spend billions of dollars a year to attach their businesses and brands to the N.F.L.

It has not escaped notice that one of those businesses, State Farm, will have its name attached to Monday night’s broadcast less than a year after it announced that it would not renew 30,000 homeowner policies and 42,000 policies for commercial apartments in California. (The N.F.L. has donated $5 million to Los Angeles relief efforts.)

Advertisement

With so much riding on each contest, the N.F.L. does everything it can to play every game every year. When the league creates its season schedule each spring, it prepares contingency plans including an alternate site for each game. In 2022, when a massive snowstorm hit western New York, the Buffalo Bills played a home game at Ford Field in Detroit.

During the pandemic, outbreaks in locker rooms forced the league to postpone several games, though none were canceled. When pandemic conditions in Santa Clara County, Calif., deteriorated, the San Francisco 49ers moved to Arizona for a month, playing three home games in State Farm Stadium. Arizona was also a backstop in 2003 when the Chargers moved their home game against the Miami Dolphins because of fires in San Diego.

This time, the fires spread so quickly, the league decided to move the game five days before kickoff. Kevin Demoff, the president of the Rams, said the team had been in constant contact with officials in Los Angeles, who initially thought the game could be held at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, which was unaffected by the fires.

But that changed midweek, when fires broke out close to the team’s training facility in Woodland Hills, forcing some players and staff to evacuate their homes and for one practice to be cut short. Demoff said he did not want the players and staff to be distracted, nor did he want city and county resources to be diverted for the game when they could be used to help others in need.

Moving the game is “just a recognition that there’s some things bigger than football and we owe this to our community to make sure that this game can be played safely and not be a distraction,” Demoff said Friday.

Advertisement

ESPN was on hold as well. Four of its production trucks were en route to Los Angeles from Pittsburgh when the league told the network on Wednesday night that the game could be moved to Glendale. The crews spent the night in Kingman, Ariz. On Thursday, the plan was to set up in both stadiums in case the league waited until Saturday to decide where to play. So the trucks continued on to Los Angeles while another set of trucks left for Glendale. When the N.F.L. said Thursday that the game had been moved, the first set of trucks, which had reached Ontario, Calif., turned around and arrived in Glendale with time to spare.

The Cardinals also helped out the Rams in ways beyond just lending their stadium. The team’s owner, Michael Bidwill, sent two team planes to Los Angeles to help the Rams get their entourage and equipment to Arizona.

Continue Reading

Trending