Pittsburg, PA
The Future is Growing at Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens | Pittsburgh Magazine
PHOTO BY BECKY THURNER BRADDOCK
Richard Piacentini, president and CEO of Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens, will never forget his initial glimpse of the grand, glass venue as he rounded the corner in Oakland on his way there for a job interview in 1993.
“I was totally blown away,” he recalls. “From that moment on, I wanted that job.”
At the time, he was serving as executive director of Leila Arboretum in Battle Creek, Mich., and wasn’t seeking a new position. Yet when he received a call from the head of Phipps’s search committee, he became intrigued.
PHOTO BY PAUL WIEGMAN
The New York native had never heard of Phipps, which surprised him as someone incredibly active in the botanical garden world. He quickly learned that, while many folks in Pittsburgh cherish this institution, those in the greater botanical garden world weren’t in the know about Phipps — yet.
Piacentini arrived in 1994, almost a year after Phipps had transitioned from city to private, non-profit management (known as Phipps Conservatory, Inc.). There had been an interim manager before he arrived. Around that same time, the Pittsburgh Zoo, Aviary and Citiparks also shifted to nonprofit status.
During that original interview, the search committee expressed great interest in Phipps remaining a typical botanical garden, according to Piacentini. And it wasn’t long before Piacentini’s conversations with Pittsburghers crystalized how families here treasure their personal, multi-generational history.
As he soon discovered, Phipps holds a pivotal place in locals’ hearts due to childhood excursions with parents and grandparents.
“You cherish those memories,” Piacentini says. “It’s ingrained in a lot of people’s minds.”
PHOTO BY PAUL WIEGMAN
He decided it would be a big mistake to get rid of the venue’s beloved flower shows. Instead, Piacentini saw the need to encourage attendance at the conservatory throughout the entire year. While still keeping the shows, Phipps has since greatly expanded its offerings.
By 1997, the motto “Something’s always blooming at Phipps” took flight — a promise of enticing programming in any season. Today, the verdant property encompasses 15 acres, including a 14-room glasshouse and 23 distinct gardens.
Beyond the ever-changing seasonal flower displays, Phipps is home to permanent collections that showcase orchids and ferns, palms and cacti. Loyal fans covet the vibrant Spring Flower Shows, renowned bonsai collections and modern traditions such as the glowing Winter Light Garden.
The venue also prides itself on educational programming for all ages, with the goal to inspire in fields such as gardening, botanical craft, healthy living and the culinary arts.
With Piacentini’s arrival, Phipps changed how its exhibits were installed, too. Before, a couple-week gap may have lingered between shows, often leaving spaces empty. (Piacentini even remembers guests asking for their money back.) Now, visitors can experience the flower exhibits while in progress.
“How fun is that?” Piacentini says. “We really changed the whole concept and mentality.”
When Piacentini began there, the venue received about 110,000 visitors a year; they now get more than 450,000 annually. He emphasizes the uniqueness of the offerings, since only a few conservatories in the country do flower shows like Phipps — one other being Longwood Gardens in Eastern Pennsylvania.
PHOTO BY PAUL WIEGMAN
Honoring History, Changing with the Times
The venue has been an important local landmark since 1893, when Henry Phipps presented Phipps Conservatory as a gift to the city. His initial aim was to “erect something that will prove to be a source of instruction as well as pleasure to the people.”
Ever since, visitors have been welcomed to the Schenley Park oasis. Throughout the decades, it’s remained a destination where folks can connect with nature and find a respite from city pollution — something especially desired during the Industrial Revolution.
Yet while holding onto its treasured history, the conservatory is constantly being reinvented. Market research showed that Phipps needed to focus on improving visitor services, so administrators began a multi-phase expansion after Piacentini’s 1994 arrival. At the time, the Welcome Center didn’t have a cafe or gift shop, but it was clear people wanted on-site options for both.
“We realized if we wanted to be the kind of place that draws people from outside the region, we needed to increase visitor stay time,” Piacentini says.
Prior to the addition of the Tropical Forest Conservatory, many visitors remained on property for an hour or less. (Research studies have suggested that guests need to stay for a minimum of 1.5 hours to be satisfied.) What nobody realized, however, was that the expansion project would ultimately transform the conservatory into an internationally recognized leader in sustainability.
In a letter celebrating “125 years of wonder,” Piacentini wrote, “But even as we broke ground on this complex of revolutionary buildings — including the first LEED-certified visitor center in a public garden, a Tropical Forest Conservatory that eliminates the greenhouse effect, the world’s only LEED Platinum-certified Production Greenhouses and one of the greenest buildings in the world, the Center for Sustainable Landscapes — the melding of instruction and pleasure has remained at the core.”
PHOTO BY PAUL WIEGMAN
Going Green
Over time, climate change has become an increasing concern and focus at Phipps. Piacentini notes that, when this venue was developed in 1893, people had very different mindsets, as many believed they were going to “conquer” nature.
The focus on sustainability — now a crucial Phipps pillar — didn’t emerge until officials started considering the master plan for the future. In the process of interviewing architects for the Tropical Forest Conservatory, the venue’s leaders talked to Bill McDonough, who introduced them to a then-new certification program called LEED.
They realized if they truly cared about the environment, their actions and designs must align with their values. In 2003, work began on the new Welcome Center; it opened in 2005. The LEED-certified building features an inviting beacon of warmth, Dale Chihuly’s Goldenrod, Teal and Citron Chandelier, which was designed and created exclusively for Phipps.
The year 2006 introduced both the Production Greenhouse and Tropical Forest Conservatory, a multi-level exhibit with exotic plants, rushing waterfalls and a tranquil fish pond that made its debut as the most energy-efficient structure of its kind. Every three years, it showcases a different part of the world, and experiences no greenhouse effect, thanks to elements such as high-efficiency, double-pane glass, six underground earth tubes, and a radical roof design where half can open.
When designing the Production Greenhouse, staff and board members were told they couldn’t get a greenhouse LEED-certified. The team later went back and got it deemed Platinum in 2012 under the LEED-EBOM (Existing Buildings Operation and Maintenance) rating system. It took a few years to identify other greenhouses for a comparative study in order to prove their greenhouses were much more efficient.
Piacentini says the Phipps team has “upped the ante” with each new development. On the lower campus alone, they’ve erected three zero-energy buildings: the Center for Sustainable Landscapes, opened in 2012; the Nature Lab at Phipps, opened in 2015; and the Exhibit Staging Center, opened in 2019.
PHOTO BY PAUL WIEGMAN
Current + Future Endeavors
In discussing their most meaningful accomplishments, Piacentini highlights the complete renovation of the original conservatory to make it look as it did back in 1893. This includes the replacement of the ogee (the distinctive architectural molding and arch curve formation) at the top of the Victorian-inspired Palm Court, which had been missing since a devastating storm in 1938.
Phipps has now turned its attention to the glasshouse decarbonization project, which will transform the glasshouse and additional facilities into a net-zero energy campus powered by 100% renewable energy while simultaneously preserving the historic character of the building. The project will serve as a global model for others wanting to retrofit historic structures — and inspire large institutions to transition from fossil fuels.
“It’s the biggest challenge yet, but we’re very excited,” Piacentini says. “We have a plan, and we think we can do it.”
Last spring, Phipps announced it had acquired the former Irish Centre site in Squirrel Hill. Although the project is still pending funding — and is contingent on the timing of the nearby Commercial Street Bridge demolition over the summer — it is intended to be used for the growth of both plants and communities.
The satellite site will serve as headquarters for Phipps’ Homegrown program, an incubator for new community greening projects that has expanded to more than 250 city-wide gardens (primarily in areas without access to fresh food), a nursery for plants for upcoming flower shows and a laboratory for research projects. Over time, Phipps plans to transform the property into a green building as well.
Piacentini also is proud of the Sustainable Landcare Program, developed to teach landscapers how to care for properties without the use of toxic chemicals.
“This is very important for people with children and grandchildren, in addition to schools, daycares and others,” he says.
Leaving a Better World
Phipps’ leaders seem to understand that humans are naturally compelled to understand and protect the things they find beautiful. In this way, they see how a place like Phipps can “help demonstrate important lessons about how to live, work and build in harmony with the natural world.” They’re happy to share knowledge gained along the way.
In 2019, Phipps created The Climate Toolkit — a collaborative program for museums, gardens, zoos, science centers, nature centers, field stations and related institutions that also want to learn how to “aggressively address climate change.” Since its inception, the initiative has grown to reach 254 institutions in 30 different countries; they’ve even started one for nonprofits in Pittsburgh.
Of all the team’s accomplishments at Phipps, Piacentini says, “the most exciting thing is the mindset we’ve been able to develop.”
He credits regenerative thinking as the single most important reason they’ve been able to build some of the greenest buildings in the world. In using regenerative systems-based nested thinking, he explains, “We see ourselves in relation to everything in nature.”
This means working to enhance the whole versus isolated components, ensuring that human and environmental health are prioritized over profit, and understanding that success needs to be measured in the long term.
Throughout Phipps’ many evolutions as one of the city’s most generous gifts, the venue’s leaders have never lost sight of its true purpose: connecting people to nature.
“We’re still doing the same, but seeing it from different angles 130 years later,” Piacentini says. “I think we’re really lucky to have Phipps here in Pittsburgh.”
Pittsburg, PA
Pittsburgh Bureau of Fire Chief Darryl Jones placed on administrative leave
Pittsburgh Bureau of Fire Chief Darryl Jones is on paid administrative leave pending the outcome of an internal review, Pittsburgh Public Safety confirmed on Monday.
Sources say the allegation isn’t criminal in nature. The internal review stems from allegations against the chief involving his management of the fire bureau, sources say.
Assistant Chief Matt Davis will now step up as acting chief.
There is no timeline yet for how long Jones will be out on paid leave, but Pittsburgh’s Office of Municipal Investigations will conduct the internal review.
Pittsburg, PA
Kozora: In 2027, Pittsburgh’s Wallet Will Open Wide For Its Offensive Line
Like the offseasons that have preceded it, 2027 will be about the quarterback. Do the Pittsburgh Steelers bank on Will Howard or Drew Allar as the future? Is the answer in the 2027 draft? Is there another door to open? Until there’s a long-term solution, it will always dominate the conversation.
Putting aside the obvious, the other top storyline centers on the men asked to protect the quarterback. Pittsburgh’s 2027 offseason will be defined by paying its offensive line, a good but expensive problem to have.
Even knowing Broderick Jones isn’t likely to receive a new deal, Omar Khan will have discussions with virtually everyone else. The 2023 draft class all could be in line for summer extensions: OT Troy Fautanu, C Zach Frazier and OG Mason McCormick. None will hit free agency until 2028, and Fautanu has the fifth-year option, but all three will be first-time eligible for a deal, and deserving of one. The longer teams wait, the more they pay.
McCormick might be the cheapest, but even that is a relative term. The guard market’s heated up the past two offseason cycles. His going rate could be $20 million per season.
Robert Hunt signed a five-year, $100 million deal with the Carolina Panthers in 2024. This past offseason, Will Fries inked a five-year, $87.72 million, that’s $17.5 mil per year, with the Minnesota Vikings.
Given the salary cap’s projected increase, McCormick could be looking at a similar figure. Perhaps a slightly shorter deal, a four-year extension with his final rookie year rolled into the agreement, but a big money pact all the same.
Although McCormick hasn’t received the fanfare of Frazier or Fautanu, he broke out in 2025. His run and pass blocking improved. He was durable and didn’t miss a single snap.
Frazier’s market has spiked. Thank Tyler Linderbaum for that. He didn’t just reset but shattered the center market this offseason, leaving the Baltimore Ravens for the Las Vegas Raiders on a three-year, $81 million deal. His $27 million APY blows away second place Creed Humphrey and his $18 million mark. Now, every center next to get paid will want to get near that figure.
Unless Frazier truly has an All-Pro seasons, he probably won’t surpass him. Something in the 20-million range, say $22 million per year, is realistic. Frazier’s been steady and solid in the middle, and Pittsburgh won’t want to start its pivot search again.
Then there’s Fautanu. Flipping and likely staying at left tackle, he’s playing a premium position. Even if the thinking is antiquated, blindside protectors still get paid more than their right side counterparts. The Colts’ Bernard Raimann signed a four-year, $100 million contract in July, 2025. In January, Charles Cross went for an average of $26.1 million.
Fautanu will be looking for the same if not more. He’ll definitely want more than whatever Frazier commands at center. Fautanu could push for upwards of $30 million per year if his season is good enough.
There is a caveat. Fautanu’s fifth-year option is due next May, and it’s likely to get be exercised. If so, he’ll be the first by a homegrown Steeler since T.J. Watt. But that also could extend out the timeline of an extension by one season. Minkah Fitzpatrick and Watt had to wait one year from their option due dates to receive their extension. If Fautanu follows the same, his contract won’t come until 2028.
It would be rare for Pittsburgh to get a deal done with Fautanu two years out, but the longer the team waits, the more he’ll cost. And if he has a great year, Pittsburgh, under Omar Khan and Mike McCarthy, who have never been in charge of a fifth year option situation in Pittsburgh before, might think about things differently. Age is a factor, too. Fautanu was an older prospect coming out of school. If Pittsburgh waits until 2028, Fautanu will be 27-going-on-28. Hardly old but the sooner he plays out an extension, the better the odds are for the Steelers to get good return on the deal.
Either way, there will be at least some level of financial component to Fautanu next offseason. Either just his fifth-year option, an amount likely worth over $20 million, and the chance of a long-term pact.
Naturally, this all presumes McCormick, Frazier, and Fautanu stay healthy and play well this season. Health is unpredictable, but it’s reasonable to think all three will continue thriving on the field. Pittsburgh’s invested so much in its offensive line and deserves credit for it. Soon will come the time to keep the group together. The “retain” part of draft, develop, retain.
Fautanu and McCormick are shifting back to their college homes. Frazier has been nothing but excellent out of the gate. Pittsburgh won’t want to break the band up.
In average value, the deals could look like this:
Mason McCormick: $20 million per season
Zach Frazier: $22-23 million per season
Troy Fautanu: $28 million per season (potentially $30 million-plus if his timeline waits another season).
Big, big money.
They aren’t the only ones to think about. Dylan Cook might be one of the most interesting debates next year. He’s slated to become a restricted free agent that can pay him the first substantial money of his NFL career.
A refresher: teams can place a tender on a RFA: first, second, or original round. The other 31 teams can still submit a contract offer. If Pittsburgh declines to match, they lose the player but gain the pick corresponding to the tender.
Here’s 2027’s tender projections:
First Round: $8.735 million
Second Round: $6.261 million
Original Round: $3.822 million
Because Cook went undrafted, the original round tender would only give Pittsburgh the right of first refusal and the opportunity to match the contract. If not, they won’t receive a draft pick back.
That puts the team in an interesting position. Apply the original round tender and the team could save money. But it also opens themselves to teams submitting an offer for a still-young tackle without getting any compensation in return.
Applying the second round tender makes more sense. But it will cost more. Likely behind Max Iheanachor and Fautanu, he’ll be an expensive backup.
What’s the right answer? Hard to say. But paying for good offensive linemen is worth it, and the money “saved” by declining Broderick Jones’ fifth-year option can be applied to Cook.
There’s other names to consider. Spencer Anderson is in the final year of his rookie deal. Gennings Dunker appears to be the long-term hope, but what if Anderson wins the starting right guard job and holds onto it? It won’t be so easy to just let him walk. Brock Hoffman signed a one-year deal and will be a free agent next year. Will Pittsburgh re-sign him for depth? They could.
Then, there’s Jones. His future with the team looks bleak, but is there a scenario in which he returns? As Dave Bryan outlined on the podcast, Jones’ contract, in theory, could toll and roll over into 2027 if, and it’s a big if, he spends the entire 2026 season on Reserve/PUP due to his neck injury.
If not and he becomes a free agent, would Pittsburgh sign him back as a swing tackle? Probably not, but if Jones walks, and Cook gets poached on the tender, the team’s depth will have taken a big hit.
Pittsburgh’s 2027 offseason could be similar to 2014. That June, Maurkice Pouncey signed a five-year extension to become the NFL’s highest-paid center. Two months later, Marcus Gilbert signed his own five-year deal. It was part of an effort to keep the group intact.
This time around, Pittsburgh could pay three players and for substantially more money. Combined, Pouncey and Gilbert’s contracts amounted to about $74 million. Any one of Frazier’s, McCormick’s, or Fautanu’s deals could surpass that.
These aren’t complaints. Having talented draft picks to pay is welcome news for a team who has missed far too often. Only one selection of the 2020 class, EDGE Alex Highsmith, saw a multi-year second contract.
Ditto with the 2021 group – TE Pat Freiermuth. The 2022 class had none. Opening up the wallet for these names is what a team wants. But it’s a storyline and projection that hasn’t been discussed much, and one worth getting in front of.
It’s also relevant for national talking heads like Colin Cowherd who criticize the team for spending so much on defense. Those scales will tip back if these deals get done.
McCormick. Fautanu. Frazier. Cook. Anderson. Jones. Hoffman. All offensive line decisions to work through.
Answers will come in time. There’s an entire season to play, and what we expect now versus next year’s reality are often different things. But the last time we did this, we noted George Pickens’ future would come into focus in the 2025 offseason. It did by Pittsburgh trading him to Dallas.
General managers have to be forward-thinking, especially with these large contracts that will impact the cap. Having a quarterback on a cheap contract will help, and Pittsburgh should have the money to sign whoever they want.
Next offseason will be a busy one. Quarterback will grab the national headlines, but the offensive line will be where the money, and important decisions, will be made.
Pittsburg, PA
Pirates Shockingly Place Carmen Mlodzinski on Restricted List
PITTSBURGH — The Pittsburgh Pirates made a recent move to their rotation, which has resulted in a surprising move from one player.
The Pirates announced that they placed right-handed pitcher Carmen Mlodzinski on the restricted list and recalled right-handed pitcher Cam Sanders from Triple-A Indianapolis ahead of their series finale vs. the Minnesota Twins at PNC Park on May 31.
A player going on the restricted list means that they either left the team without a valid reason, or could be announcing retirement, but may consider returning in the near future to play later on.
It is a shocking decision, as there was no indication something like this was happening and makes a big change to the Pirates pitching staff moving forward.
Why Pirates May Have Placed Mlodzinski on Restricted List
This case with Mlodzinski is likely the former, although not confirmed, as he was in the clubhouse ahead of the game, so something may have happened closer to first pitch.
Pirates manager Don Kelly announced postgame in the 10-9 win on May 30 that Mlodzinski would follow right-handed starting pitcher Braxton Ashcraft in the series finale.
Mlodzinski was a part of the Pirates starting rotation for the first two months of the season, but Jared Jones recently came off the injured list and took his role in the rotation, with the Pirates sending Mlodzinski back to the bullpen.
He said following the decision that he would talk with his agency and those close to him, so he may have decided to depart the team after this.
“Obviously just excited to have Jared back with us,” Mlodzinski said. “I can honestly say I’m just still communicating with the organization and the people in my corner, whether that’s my family or my agency, about what is next. I really don’t have any comments after that.”
How This Changes Pirates Pitching Staff
Mlodzinski has been an effective relief pitcher with the Pirates, with a 2.63 ERA over 140.1 innings pitched and 94 appearances.
The Pirates had plans for Mlodzinski as a bulk reliever, but someone that can also fill any role, including in high-leverage situations and as a middle reliever, something the team has seriously needed.
His departure hurts a Pirates bullpen that has really looked for consistent arms that can get outs, preserve leads and give the team a chance to make a comeback late.
Sanders has struggled in his time in MLB with the Pirates, with a 9.26 ERA over 11 appearances, a .300 batting average allowed and a 2.20 WHIP.
The Pirates can make a few decisions on Mlodzinski, who could technically still comeback, but it looks like they will trade him at this point.
Make sure to visit Pirates OnSI for the latest news, updates, interviews and insight on the Pittsburgh Pirates!
Follow
-
Detroit, MI14 seconds agoFrankie Valli cancels tour. Why Four Seasons won’t be back in Detroit
-
San Francisco, CA12 minutes agoLive From Microsoft Build 2026 San Francisco
-
Dallas, TX15 minutes agoDallas Cowboys Full OTA Schedule Ahead Of 2026 NFL Season
-
Miami, FL20 minutes agoThese Miami pizza spots rank among America’s best
-
Boston, MA27 minutes agoNew England’s most welcoming towns and best summer escapes
-
Denver, CO30 minutes agoA Writer Goes Down the Rabbit Hole at Denver’s First Microdosing Cafe
-
Seattle, WA35 minutes agoMan injured during stabbing attack in Seattle’s University District
-
San Diego, CA42 minutes agoMore Thoughts on ‘Yes on A’